Ko Olina Hillside Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ko Olina Hillside Villas
Building Overview
Ko Olina Hillside Villas in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — 2006 wood-frame condos with pool and central AC.
About Ko Olina Hillside Villas
Based on MLS data, Ko Olina Hillside Villas is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. The development was built in 2006 and is constructed with a wood frame. Size and unit count details are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the property offers community amenities including a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, and on-site personnel such as a resident manager and security guard. Units are served by central air conditioning and many homes report sunset views.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking provided. Pets are not allowed, while short-term rentals are permitted per the MLS data. Management company information is not provided in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, including rules, fees, and current policies, with the listing broker or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any numeric owner-occupancy rate or qualitative phrasing that could be converted into a percentage, but found none. Without explicit public remark evidence, the owner-occupancy level cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, including counts or phrases like multiple elevators, but found nothing. Since there is no explicit evidence in the remarks and no current numeric value provided, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is strongly supported at the building level: 19/20 historical MLS listings include OTCOEX, and multiple remarks say the HOA covers 'utilities for common area.' The evidence appears consistent across many listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building does not appear to include hot water in maintenance fees. No listings show HOTWAT, and many remarks specifically reference in-unit water heaters, which is a strong indicator that building-supplied hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong building-level evidence that sewer is included. Historical MLS checkboxes show SEWER in 18/20 listings, and at least one detailed remark directly says monthly fees include 'water, sewer.'
Water appears to be included in the association fees at the building level. The MLS history is consistent at 18/20 listings, and current remarks reinforce this with explicit mentions of water being covered.
BBQ/grilling facilities are clearly a shared amenity in this building. Remarks across many listings consistently mention 'BBQ grills,' 'BBQ area,' 'private bbq areas,' and even an 'outdoor kitchen area oasis,' indicating broad, repeated support rather than a one-off copy/paste note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building/community appears to have a clubhouse-like shared amenity through the Ko Olina Beach & Sports Club and related common facilities. Evidence is more moderate than for pool or gym, but the repeated references to a community hub and activity center support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for an exercise room/fitness center. Multiple listings repeatedly reference access to a 'fitness center,' 'gym,' and 'fitness classes,' which is consistent across agents and not limited to a single unit.
No analysis available
There is not enough public-remarks evidence to support a meeting room as a building amenity. Because the feature is mentioned in only 2 of 20 current listings and no remarks describe it directly, it is likely a copy/paste or unverified MLS entry rather than a confirmed shared space.
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'private patio,' 'lanai,' 'private covered porch,' 'wood lanai,' 'back lanai,' and 'private fenced patio,' and the current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings include PATDEC/COVPAT. The consistency across many remarks and agents makes this a high-confidence building feature.
Moderate-to-strong evidence: 14 of 20 listings include jogging/walking path amenities. Remarks mention 'walking paths', 'jogging path', and a 'trail connecting all lagoons', suggesting community paths/trails suitable for walking or jogging are present and commonly advertised.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak/absent evidence: only 3 of 20 listings have the putting green checkbox and none of the remarks mention a putting green. Listings reference nearby championship golf but do not describe an on-site putting green, so there is insufficient evidence the building/community offers this amenity.
There is solid evidence for a shared recreation area. Listings describe a 'recreation area,' 'recreation center,' and amenity space with pool/spa/BBQ features, which appears consistently in multiple remarks.
Listings consistently refer to an outdoor recreation center/area (e.g., 'recreation center with pool, spa, BBQs & cabana', 'onsite recreation area w/ a pool') but never mention an interior recreation room, game room, or multi-purpose room. While a 'party cabana' and similar outdoor structures exist, they are open-air amenity spaces, not enclosed recreation rooms. Given the detailed repetition of amenities across many agents without any reference to an indoor rec room, this feature is best treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage units/extra storage are consistently referenced across the listings, with at least 4-6 explicit mentions in the public remarks. Phrases like 'extra storage,' 'storage closet,' 'overhead garage storage rack system,' and 'extra overhead storage in garage' indicate this is a real building/unit feature, not just MLS copy-paste checkbox noise.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage and found nothing. The remarks mention paddle boarding as an activity, but no dedicated storage facility for boards.
Tennis facilities are well supported at the building/community level. Several listings mention 'tennis courts' or 'tennis/pickleball courts,' and the recurring language suggests this is a genuine amenity available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across many listings, agents repeatedly describe building amenities including a 'jacuzzi', 'whirlpool', 'whirlpool spa', 'spa', or 'hot tub' alongside the community pool. The volume and consistency of these independent mentions confirm that the complex has a shared whirlpool/hot tub amenity.
Pool evidence is extremely strong and consistent across the remarks: numerous listings mention a community pool, including phrases like "steps from the community pool," "recreation area with pool," "lap pool," and "private pool for community residents." This aligns with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 listings with pool-related amenities, suggesting the feature is not copy-paste error but a real shared building amenity.
No listing remarks mention a heated swimming pool, and 0/20 MLS records explicitly mark the pool as heated in pool_features despite frequent detailed amenity descriptions. Only 2/20 listings show a generic heated-pool amenity code, which is more plausibly referring to the hot tub/whirlpool, so the evidence points to an unheated main pool for this building.
I searched for salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar pool descriptions and found none. The pool is described generically as a pool, lap pool, whirlpool, jacuzzi, or hot tub, so there is no public-remarks evidence that it is saltwater.
There is overwhelming evidence that Ko Olina Hillside Villas offers in-unit laundry. Across many current remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or included with the home, and the historical MLS pattern is extremely strong at 18/20 listings. The evidence appears consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, laundry fee, or other paid-community-laundry language and found none. The only laundry references are to in-unit or garage laundry setup, not a paid common laundry room.
I searched the remarks for phrases like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry, but found nothing. One listing mentions the interior laundry room was converted to a pantry and laundry is in the garage, which points away from shared floor-by-floor facilities.
Strong building-level evidence confirms parking for this building. Across the listings, remarks repeatedly reference parking arrangements including garage, driveway parking, and guest stalls, which is consistent with the MLS parking features in all 20 listings.
Multiple listings (at least 8) specify that each unit includes its own garage and a dedicated second stall, using phrases like "attached 1-car garage plus an additional parking space" and "enclosed one car garage and designated driveway parking." This repeated pattern across different agents and listings shows that parking is reserved by unit rather than entirely unassigned or first-come, first-served. MLS data with ASSIGN in some parking_features further supports that assigned parking is a standard feature in this community.
Covered parking is very well supported and appears in essentially every listing through MLS codes and remarks. Multiple agents describe the same feature using phrases like "attached 1-car garage," "enclosed garage," and "fully covered garage," indicating consistent building-level covered parking.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, and similar wording, but found no explicit mention. The remarks describe parking arrangements, but not deeded ownership of any stall.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, and related terms, but found nothing. The listings discuss garage/driveway/visitor parking, yet no separate parking cost is stated.
Several listings (8 of 20 per MLS checkbox data) and multiple agent remarks reference guest/visitor parking — quotes include "guest stalls within steps to the unit" and "guest parking next to your unit." Evidence is consistent though not universal across all listings, indicating guest parking is available but not assigned to every unit.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is clearly present in this building, though not every unit advertises it. Several listings explicitly mention tandem parking in the remarks, and the MLS data shows 11/20 listings with tandem codes, suggesting the feature is real but unit-dependent.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking, and found none. The available remarks only discuss where cars can be parked.
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob access, card readers, keycard entry, or similar electronic access language and found none. The remarks do mention security, but only in the form of guards/patrol, not card/fob-controlled entry.
Strong evidence across listings that the building has on-site security: several remarks explicitly state "resident manager and security guard", "roving aloha team security at all times", and "security patrol and video." Historical MLS checkbox data also indicated SECGUA on many listings (11 of 20), and multiple agents independently mention security rather than a single copy/paste instance.
There is strong direct evidence that the building/community has security patrol service. Multiple listings also reference security guard and resident manager, reinforcing that on-site security presence is part of the community.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms the building offers central air conditioning. Multiple agents explicitly mention it in remarks, often with upgrade details such as "central air conditioning," "Central A/C system was installed in 2024," and "Central AC HVAC system replaced in 2022," which supports that this is not just copied MLS checkbox data. This aligns with the very high historical MLS confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data previously indicated concrete construction for this building with many prior entries marking it; 7 of 20 current listings still check CONCRE. Public remarks across the sampled listings do not explicitly state construction materials (no phrases like "concrete construction" or "reinforced concrete"), so evidence is mixed — retained based on historical data but with moderate confidence because current checkbox selection is not dominant.
Strong evidence supports double-wall construction for this building. Current MLS data shows 15 of 20 listings selecting DOUWAL, and the public remarks do not show any contradiction or change. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence that some units/building records identify a concrete slab foundation, with 7 of 20 current MLS listings marking SLAB. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'concrete slab' or similar, so this is supported primarily by MLS checkbox data rather than remark text.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list wood-frame construction (WOOFRA) and prior analyses rated wood-frame as High confidence. Public remarks sampled do not state an alternate structural system or a recent rebuild, so wood-frame is strongly supported across multiple agent entries and retained with high confidence.
9 of 20 current MLS listings mark above-ground construction (ABOGRO) while historical notes flagged above-ground previously but also noted conflicts with slab design in other entries. Public remarks do not describe the building as "above ground" or reference elevation-related renovations, so evidence is ambiguous — included because some listings continue to list it, but only at moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly allow short-term/vacation rentals, usually with a 30-day minimum. This is direct evidence that STR is allowed in the building.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded hotel program references, but found none. Since STR is allowed but no hotel-pool arrangement is mentioned, this is set to false.
The listings consistently describe flexible ownership and rental use, not mandatory participation in any hotel or rental pool. I found no language requiring owners to rent through a program, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, and renewal terms, but found none. The remarks instead indicate fee simple ownership, so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
Multiple listings directly reference VA financing, including an assumable VA loan and explicit VA approval. This is strong public-remark evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
Multiple remarks directly indicate insurance is covered by the HOA/fees, which is consistent with full building insurance or walls-in coverage. The repeated language around HOA-covered insurance makes this a strong positive signal.
No analysis available
I looked for any wording indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or related safety certification, but the remarks do not mention it. In the absence of explicit public remark evidence, this should not be treated as confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from the current MLS indicates 4 of 20 listings list mountain views and at least one listing remark explicitly states "serene mountain views from the spacious primary bedroom." Mentions are present but not widespread across agents/listings, suggesting some units have mountain views though the feature is not universal.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-oriented views are well supported across multiple listings, with current MLS data showing 10 of 20 listings marked GARDEN and several public remarks explicitly describing garden/courtyard/landscaped outlooks. Examples include "view of the community garden," "quaint garden lanai," "open field (and the community garden)," and "faces beautiful tropical landscaping," which suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current public remarks (at least 6 listings) explicitly mention sunset views or enjoying sunsets from the lanai/primary bedroom — including the phrase "breathtaking sunset views from both the lanai and the spacious primary bedroom." Historical data also indicated High confidence for sunset views. Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across listings rather than a single copy/paste, so building-level sunset views remain supported.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly state fireworks can be viewed from the property, which satisfies the requirement that the view is from the building/units. This is strong direct evidence rather than just proximity to fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to have a resident manager on-site. Historical MLS data is strong, with 13 of 20 current listings showing the RESMAN amenity, and one public remark explicitly says “resident manager and security guard.” The evidence is consistent with a real building-level feature and not just isolated copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.