Kings Gate
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kings Gate
Building Overview
Kings Gate in McCully-Moiliili (1981) — concrete building with ocean and Diamond Head views; on-site pool and BBQ area.
About Kings Gate
Kings Gate is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1981 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property offers ocean, mountain and Diamond Head views and includes on-site amenities such as a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. The listing notes the building does not allow short-term rentals and pets are not permitted.
Parking is available and described as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on the available MLS information; buyers should verify details, fees, rules and unit-specific attributes with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks focus on renovations, views, parking, and amenities, with no occupancy ratio information. Since there is no evidence in the listings, the value cannot be determined from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count, including phrases like '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' and 'multiple elevators.' The listings only reference an elevator generically, so there is not enough evidence to determine the number. Because no count is stated, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee for this building. MLS data is highly consistent at 19/20 listings showing OTCOEX, and there are no contrary remarks suggesting a change. This looks like a reliable building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 19 listings have HOTWAT checked and a public remark explicitly says 'The monthly HOA includes water, hot water, and sewer.' Three listings show WTRHTR (units with water heaters), which suggests some unit-level variation, but the majority MLS data and the explicit remark provide strong evidence that hot water is included in the HOA for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is unanimous at 20/20, and a public remark explicitly confirms it: "The monthly HOA includes water, hot water, and sewer." This is strong, building-level evidence with no sign of a change.
Water is included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is unanimous at 20/20, and a public remark explicitly says the HOA includes "water, hot water, and sewer." The evidence is strong across listings and appears to be consistent copy/paste only in the sense that the checkbox data is uniformly supported.
BBQ is strongly confirmed for King’s Gate. Current remarks explicitly cite a 'BBQ area' and 'BBQ areas,' and the MLS data shows BBQ in 16 of 20 listings. This appears to be a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are confirmed by a current remark that names 'car wash' directly. The MLS history shows 10 of 20 listings with CRWSH, which supports that this is a real amenity offered by the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 2/18 MLS listings check EXEROO, and none of the many detailed remarks mention a gym, fitness center, or exercise room despite thoroughly listing amenities like pool, whirlpool, sauna, and BBQ.
No analysis available
Meeting room/community room is moderately suggested by the MLS data, with 12 of 20 listings checking MEEROO. The remarks do not directly confirm it, so this is a probable but not fully explicit building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 9/20 listings include RECARE. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'recreation area' but multiple listings reference shared amenities such as BBQ areas and a spacious lobby/resort-style amenities, implying a communal recreation space. Evidence is moderate — MLS checkbox prevalence supports inclusion, but the lack of explicit phrasing in agent remarks keeps confidence below high.
Recreation room is not supported by the public remarks, and the MLS signal is weak at only 2 of 20 listings. Because there are no explicit references like 'rec room' or 'game room,' this feature appears unconfirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is clearly a building amenity. It is named in multiple remarks, often alongside the pool and hot tub/whirlpool, and the MLS data is very strong at 16 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage or related storage amenities such as board storage or surf storage. The listings mention general storage in some units, but nothing specifically for surfboards. There is no public-remarks evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building-level amenity based on the MLS checkbox data, with 17 of 20 listings including TRACHU. The public remarks are silent, but the consistency of the MLS signal suggests this feature is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is strongly confirmed. Current remarks repeatedly use direct language such as 'whirlpool,' 'hot tub,' 'jacuzzi,' and 'spa,' and the MLS data shows this amenity in 10 of 20 listings.
Pool is strongly supported and appears to be a shared building amenity at Kings Gate. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like "resort-style amenities including a pool, whirlpool, and sauna," "Amenities include a pool, sauna, hot tub, BBQ areas," and "building amenities includes pool, sauna, BBQ area." The evidence is consistent across many different listings/agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for saltwater-pool wording such as salt water pool, saltwater pool, or saline pool. The listings do confirm a pool, but they do not describe its water type. Without any salt-related mention, this feature is not supported by the remarks.
Very strong evidence that Kings Gate offers in-unit laundry. At least 15 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including multiple variations such as 'stack washer/dryer in-unit,' 'washer and dryer in the unit,' and 'own washer and dryer.' The consistency across many listings and agents supports this as a true building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to paid shared laundry, including coin-operated machines, card payment, or laundry fees. The public remarks only mention in-unit laundry and even note no community laundry in one listing. There is no evidence that the building has paid community laundry.
I looked for language indicating shared laundry rooms on each floor, such as floor-by-floor laundry or laundry rooms on every level. The remarks instead consistently emphasize in-unit washers and dryers, and one listing directly states there is no community laundry. That makes this feature very unlikely for the building.
Parking is clearly available for the building. Across the remarks, many listings reference parking in multiple forms—assigned, covered, secured garage, gated parking, and open stalls—so this is strongly supported and not likely a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is very well supported. Multiple agents explicitly describe 'assigned' stalls, including covered, secured, and right-by-the-elevator examples, and the current MLS checkbox data aligns with that pattern.
Covered parking is strongly evidenced throughout the listings. Remarks mention 'covered parking stall within the secure garage,' 'covered, secured parking space,' and 'secure garage,' and the MLS data supports this with multiple covered/garage codes. This appears to be a real and recurring feature of the building.
The listings consistently describe assigned parking, and one explicitly ties tandem parking to fee simple ownership, which supports deeded/owned parking. While the word "deeded" is not used verbatim, the ownership language is strong evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, additional stall cost, or parking rental, but found none. The remarks only mention assigned, covered, gated, or tandem parking.
No public remarks reference guest or visitor parking, and only 4 of 20 MLS records flag GUEST. Given the lack of corroborating remarks across listings, guest parking does not appear to be a documented building-wide amenity.
Secure parking/entry is frequently mentioned: numerous listings note 'secure garage', 'gated parking', 'keyed entry', 'secured lobby and parking entry', and similar phrases. MLS checkbox data (13/20) and multiple independent remarks support that the building offers secured parking entry.
Tandem parking is clearly available for at least some units. Multiple listings explicitly state tandem stalls, often with details like 'assigned open tandem' or '2 parking stalls (tandem),' which makes this a strong building-level feature for buyers searching for tandem parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist wording like join the waitlist or parking waiting list and found no evidence. Because there is no indication of a waitlist system in the remarks, this is set to false with low-to-moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for card, fob, keycard, or electronic access language. The remarks explicitly state keyed entry and fob/key entry, which is strong evidence of card/fob access security. This feature is well supported by the public remarks.
Confidence 90%: Only 1/18 MLS listings include SECGUA, and remarks consistently describe 'secure building', 'keyed entry', and 'gated parking' but never mention a staffed security guard or 24-hour security.
I looked for any evidence of security patrol or roving security coverage. The remarks focus on keyed access, resident manager, and secured parking, but do not mention patrol service. Based on the available remarks, there is no support for security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by overwhelming MLS consensus, with 19/20 listings showing CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the current remarks dispute this, and the repeated consistency across many listings suggests this is a stable building characteristic rather than copy-paste noise.
Confidence 75%: 6/18 MLS listings include DOUWAL in construction_materials, suggesting some double-wall construction, although remarks do not comment on wall type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough support to treat slab foundation as a confirmed building feature: only 3 of 20 listings include SLAB, and no remarks corroborate it. The pattern looks more like sporadic checkbox data than a verified property characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR allowance indicators such as short-term rental allowed, NUC/TVU, vacation rental, or hotel program language, but found none. There is also no mention of 30-day minimums or owner-occupant-only restrictions, so the safest read from the remarks is that STR is not evidenced as allowed.
I searched for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation, but found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must also be false.
I looked for language indicating a mandatory rental pool, required participation, or cannot-opt-out arrangement and found none. With no STR or hotel-pool evidence in the remarks, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, renewed through, or lease end year, but found nothing. Since no specific lease expiry date appears in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly identify the building as VA approved, which strongly supports VA financing being accepted. I found direct mentions in several listings, so this is high-confidence.
I searched for wording like 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' and 'comprehensive building insurance.' The strongest repeated language is '100% hurricane insurance coverage,' which strongly supports that the HOA/building carries full insurance coverage, though the exact walls-in phrase is not used. Confidence is high because the coverage language appears in multiple listings.
Very strong evidence supports fire sprinklers: about 10+ listings explicitly mention 'fire sprinklers,' 'sprinklers,' or 'sprinkler system.' The phrasing appears consistently across multiple agents and listings, which makes this look like real building-level safety infrastructure rather than copy-paste noise. Historical high confidence is reinforced by repeated current mentions.
I looked for direct confirmation such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'passed fire inspection,' or similar certification wording. While the remarks do not use that exact phrase, they repeatedly note sprinklers, fire alarm systems, and fire safety improvements, which is strong supporting evidence that the building meets fire/life safety requirements. This is inferred from the remarks, not explicitly stated as FLSE passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported: several listings explicitly mention 'mountain and Manoa Valley views,' 'Ko'olau Mountains,' and 'lush mountain views.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single copied description, so this feature should be considered a reliable building-level offering.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported by numerous public remarks, with multiple listings using phrases like 'stunning Diamond Head views,' 'direct views of Diamond Head,' and 'diamond head views.' The repetition across many listings suggests this is a real and marketable feature of the building, not an MLS checkbox artifact.
Strong building-level evidence supports city views. At least 14 of 20 current MLS listings include CITY in the view field, and several public remarks explicitly reference "city views," "urban core," and "downtown" proximity, which is consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off mention. No conflicting remarks suggest this is a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Cemetery views appear to be available in some units based on MLS view data showing CEMETA in 8 of 20 listings. No current public remarks explicitly call out cemetery views, so the evidence is more moderate and may reflect unit-by-unit differences rather than a universally advertised feature.
I looked specifically for wording that residents can see fireworks from the building or from lanais/windows. While several listings discuss scenic views, none reference fireworks views or watching fireworks from the units. Based on the remarks, this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is clear evidence of an onsite resident manager, with at least 2 listings explicitly saying 'onsite resident manager' and related wording. Combined with the previously high-confidence MLS data, this is strong building-level confirmation. The repeated direct phrasing suggests consistent listing knowledge rather than an isolated or accidental mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.