Kings Gate
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kings Gate
Building Overview
Kings Gate in McCully-Moiliili (1981) — concrete building with ocean and Diamond Head views; on-site pool and BBQ area.
About Kings Gate
Kings Gate is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1981 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property offers ocean, mountain and Diamond Head views and includes on-site amenities such as a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. The listing notes the building does not allow short-term rentals and pets are not permitted.
Parking is available and described as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on the available MLS information; buyers should verify details, fees, rules and unit-specific attributes with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for ownership mix clues such as percentages, "owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks focus on renovations, amenities, insurance, plumbing, and location, but provide no ownership-rate information. Since there is no explicit evidence, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "4 elevators," "four elevators," "multiple elevators," and any direct elevator count. The listings only mention an elevator in passing (e.g., parking near the elevator), but never state how many elevators the building has. Because there is no explicit count, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee for this building. Current MLS data shows OTCOEX on 19 of 20 listings, suggesting a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry. No public remark explicitly mentions it, but the MLS pattern is strong enough to support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 19 listings have HOTWAT checked and a public remark explicitly says 'The monthly HOA includes water, hot water, and sewer.' Three listings show WTRHTR (units with water heaters), which suggests some unit-level variation, but the majority MLS data and the explicit remark provide strong evidence that hot water is included in the HOA for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is unanimous at 20 of 20 listings, and at least one remark explicitly confirms it with the phrase 'HOA includes water, hot water, and sewer.' This is strong, consistent evidence across the listing set.
Water is included in the maintenance fee across the building. MLS data is unanimous at 20 of 20 listings, and the public remarks reinforce this with explicit wording about the HOA including water. The evidence is consistent and appears to be building-wide rather than copy-paste error.
Multiple listings explicitly confirm BBQ facilities, including phrases like "BBQ area," "barbeque area," and "BBQ areas." This is consistent with the already high-confidence MLS history, so the evidence strongly supports a shared building amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows car wash in 10/20 listings and at least one agent remark explicitly lists 'car wash' among building amenities. Historical data previously indicated high confidence and multiple listings/remarks corroborate this; evidence is strong across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 2/18 MLS listings check EXEROO, and none of the many detailed remarks mention a gym, fitness center, or exercise room despite thoroughly listing amenities like pool, whirlpool, sauna, and BBQ.
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: 11/18 MLS listings include MEEROO in amenities, suggesting a meeting or community room, though no remarks explicitly call out a 'meeting room' or similar space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 9/20 listings include RECARE. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'recreation area' but multiple listings reference shared amenities such as BBQ areas and a spacious lobby/resort-style amenities, implying a communal recreation space. Evidence is moderate — MLS checkbox prevalence supports inclusion, but the lack of explicit phrasing in agent remarks keeps confidence below high.
Confidence 90%: Only 1/18 MLS listings include RECROO and none of the remarks mention a recreation/party room, even in detailed amenity lists that cover pool, whirlpool, sauna, BBQ, and lobby.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is explicitly referenced in many listings, including combinations like "pool, whirlpool, sauna" and "pool, hot tub, and sauna." The repeated, consistent references across multiple remarks reinforce the strong MLS evidence that this building offers a sauna.
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage and related storage amenities. The remarks discuss general storage and building amenities, but nothing about surfboard-specific storage. There is no evidence this amenity exists.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building amenity based on the MLS checkbox data: 17 of 20 listings have TRACHU checked. The public remarks do not explicitly say "trash chute" or similar, so the support comes mainly from the repeated MLS selections rather than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings confirm this amenity with direct language such as "whirlpool," "hot tub," "jacuzzi," and "spa." The repeated mentions across different agents align with the strong MLS history, making this a reliable shared building feature.
Pool is strongly supported by the current MLS and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a pool, including phrases such as "pool, whirlpool, and sauna," "pool, hot tub, and sauna," and "swimming pool," across numerous King’s Gate remarks. This is consistent building-level amenity evidence, not just isolated unit descriptions.
No analysis available
I checked for saltwater-pool wording such as salt water, saltwater, or saline pool. The building clearly has a pool, but the public remarks do not specify the water type. So salt pool status is unconfirmed and not supported.
Very strong evidence that Kings Gate offers in-unit laundry. At least 15+ of the remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including multiple variations like 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'stack washer/dryer in-unit,' and 'no community laundry.' The consistency across many listings and agents suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste MLS noise.
No analysis available
I searched for any public mention of coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. Nothing in the remarks indicates a paid shared laundry setup, and the listings point to in-unit laundry instead. So there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I looked for laundry rooms on each floor or floor-by-floor community laundry facilities. The public remarks instead repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, and one listing explicitly says there is no community laundry. That is strong evidence the building does not have community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available for the building. Across the remarks, many listings reference 'one assigned parking stall,' 'gated parking,' 'secured garage,' 'covered parking,' and '2 parking stalls (tandem).' The MLS data is consistent with this, showing parking-related codes on all current listings.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Many agents explicitly describe 'one assigned' or 'assigned parking stall,' suggesting this is a standard building feature rather than a one-off. The consistency across listings makes this a high-confidence building-level feature.
Covered parking is strongly evidenced throughout the listings. Remarks mention 'covered parking stall within the secure garage,' 'covered, secured parking space,' and 'secure garage,' and the MLS data supports this with multiple covered/garage codes. This appears to be a real and recurring feature of the building.
Most listings describe assigned, covered, secured, or tandem parking, and one explicitly uses "FEE SIMPLE" for the tandem parking. That is strong public-remarks evidence that the parking is deeded/owned rather than rented.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking fee, monthly parking charge, rental parking, or an additional stall cost. The listings mention assigned/secured parking, but no public remark gives a specific parking fee.
No public remarks reference guest or visitor parking, and only 4 of 20 MLS records flag GUEST. Given the lack of corroborating remarks across listings, guest parking does not appear to be a documented building-wide amenity.
Secure parking/entry is frequently mentioned: numerous listings note 'secure garage', 'gated parking', 'keyed entry', 'secured lobby and parking entry', and similar phrases. MLS checkbox data (13/20) and multiple independent remarks support that the building offers secured parking entry.
Tandem parking is clearly available for at least some units. Multiple remarks explicitly state '2 assigned (tandem)' or 'parking stalls (tandem),' and the MLS data shows tandem coding on a subset of listings. This indicates tandem parking is a genuine building feature, though not universal to every unit.
No analysis available
I searched for language such as parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. Nothing in the remarks suggests parking is waitlisted, so the feature is not supported by the public text.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry language. Multiple listings explicitly state fob/key entry and keyed entry, which strongly supports card/fob-based security access. This is well supported by the remarks.
Confidence 90%: Only 1/18 MLS listings include SECGUA, and remarks consistently describe 'secure building', 'keyed entry', and 'gated parking' but never mention a staffed security guard or 24-hour security.
I searched for any mention of patrol service or roving security. The building is described as secure and has a resident manager, but there is no public-remarks evidence of security patrol. So this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is supported by very strong MLS consensus, with 19 of 20 listings identifying the building as concrete construction. Public remarks mostly focus on unit updates and building repairs rather than the structure itself, so the evidence comes primarily from consistent MLS data rather than repeated marketing text.
Confidence 75%: 6/18 MLS listings include DOUWAL in construction_materials, suggesting some double-wall construction, although remarks do not comment on wall type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough support to treat slab foundation as a confirmed building feature: only 3 of 20 listings include SLAB, and no remarks corroborate it. The pattern looks more like sporadic checkbox data than a verified property characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR indicators like short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar language. The remarks do mention a rental opportunity in the general sense, but nothing indicates short-term rentals are allowed in the building, so this is treated as not supported and likely false.
I searched for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or Trump pool. None were found, and there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so this must be false.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required program membership or no opt-out. There is no evidence of any hotel pool program at all, so mandatory participation is not supported and is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, lease end year, renewal, or extension dates. Nothing in the remarks provides a 4-digit expiration year, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly identify the building as VA approved, which strongly indicates VA financing is accepted. This appears consistently across multiple listings, so confidence is very high.
I searched for wording like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or other comprehensive HOA insurance statements. The listings only reference hurricane insurance coverage and general building insurance, which is not the same as a clear statement that the building is fully insured. Without explicit full-coverage language, this is best treated as not confirmed.
Strong evidence the building has a fire sprinkler system: at least 9 current listing remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire sprinklers' (e.g., 'Kings Gate equipped with fire sprinkler system', 'unit is equipped with a fire sprinkler system'). Historical MLS checkbox data also consistently included FIRSPR (13/20 current listings), indicating broad agreement across agents rather than isolated copy/paste.
I looked for explicit fire/life safety approval language such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "passed fire inspection," or "fire safety certified." The remarks mention fire sprinklers, an updated fire alarm system, and added protection, but they do not say the building passed a formal life-safety evaluation. Absence of that wording means I cannot mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported: several listings explicitly mention 'mountain and Manoa Valley views,' 'Ko'olau Mountains,' and 'lush mountain views.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single copied description, so this feature should be considered a reliable building-level offering.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported by numerous public remarks, with multiple listings using phrases like 'stunning Diamond Head views,' 'direct views of Diamond Head,' and 'diamond head views.' The repetition across many listings suggests this is a real and marketable feature of the building, not an MLS checkbox artifact.
Current evidence indicates the building offers city views: 14 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions include CITY and multiple public remarks mention 'city view', 'city views', or 'urban' views (e.g., 'city view', 'waking up to city views', 'urban core'). This is consistent across many listings, so include the feature for buyers searching for city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Cemetery views appear to be available in some units based on MLS view data showing CEMETA in 8 of 20 listings. No current public remarks explicitly call out cemetery views, so the evidence is more moderate and may reflect unit-by-unit differences rather than a universally advertised feature.
I looked for explicit fireworks-view language such as seeing fireworks from a lanai or unit. The listings describe scenic views, but none connect those views to fireworks. So this is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across the remarks supports this feature. At least 3 listings explicitly mention an 'onsite resident manager' or 'on site resident manager,' which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history showing RESMAN in amenities for 18/20 listings. This looks like a real building-level feature, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.