King Kalani

All 5 MLS records agree on 1968 as the construction year, with no alternative year mentioned in remarks. This consistent data supports using 1968 as the building’s year built.

One listing notes 'Only 44 units in the building, you share the floor with only 3 neighbors', giving 4 units per floor. Combined with an 11xx unit number (1101), this strongly supports an 11‑story building despite the erroneous '1102' floor entry in MLS data.

One agent explicitly describes 'Only 44 units in the building', and no other listing contradicts this. This clear, direct statement provides strong evidence the building has 44 units.

No remarks reference owner-occupancy (e.g., '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied'). Per rules, when a current numeric value exists but remarks provide no evidence, the current value is retained with low confidence.

Remarks explicitly state a single elevator: "1 elevator ride up to your floor." This directly supports the current record of one elevator, so the value is set to 1 with high confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

The MLS data shows 0/5 listings with central AC included in fees. Remarks describe a unit with split AC as a rare perk, and do not mention central air or building-paid AC costs. This supports that central AC is not a utility included in the maintenance fee.

Across all 5 listings, there is no MLS checkbox for cable TV in association fee includes, and no public remarks note cable being part of the HOA. If cable were included, it would typically be highlighted alongside other utilities. This strongly suggests cable TV is not included in the building’s maintenance fees.

Every listing (5/5) shows OTCOEX in the association fee includes, indicating that general common expenses are covered by the HOA. In condo buildings, this normally includes common area electricity (hallways, elevators, shared facilities). While not spelled out in remarks, the consistent MLS coding supports that common area power is paid from maintenance fees.

All 5 listings omit the coop-tax-included checkbox and there is no language suggesting a cooperative structure. The building is marketed as a VA-approved condo, which would not involve cooperative taxes. This is strong evidence that coop taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

The MLS data consistently shows electricity not included in HOA fees (0/5 listings with the electricity-included code). Public remarks discuss reasonable HOA fees but do not say power is included, which is usually a marketing point in Honolulu. This strongly indicates individual units pay their own electric bills.

There is no MLS indication that gas is part of association fees and no listing text mentions gas appliances or gas utilities. Given building type and local norms, this supports that gas is not included in the maintenance fees. Units likely rely on electric utilities instead.

No current listings (0/6) indicate 'hot water included' while 5/6 listings explicitly include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, implying hot water is provided by individual heaters. Public remarks across listings do not mention building‑supplied hot water or that hot water is included in the HOA; evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.

Across all 5 listings, there is no MLS code for internet included and no text like “internet included” or “Wi-Fi in HOA.” Since bundled cable/internet is commonly advertised when present, its absence suggests that residents pay for their own internet service. This supports a negative for internet in fees.

The building is marketed for its proximity to Waikiki Beach, Ala Wai Golf Course, and urban amenities, with no mention of docks, boat slips, or marina facilities. No listing uses the marina-included MLS fields. This is very strong evidence that marina access or fees are not part of the HOA.

Every listing (6/6) explicitly lists SEWER in the association/HOA fee inclusions, a consistent indicator across agents. Although public remarks focus on views and unit updates, the uniform MLS checkbox evidence strongly supports that sewer is included in the HOA fees.

All listings (6/6) indicate WATER is included in the association/HOA fees, and this is consistently recorded across agents. While public remarks don't explicitly state 'water included,' the uniform MLS inclusion checkbox provides strong, corroborating evidence that water is part of the HOA fees.

The listings highlight location, parking, storage, and community laundry but never mention any BBQ or grill area. With 0/5 MLS records marking BBQ as an amenity, it is very likely the building lacks BBQ facilities.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to bike rooms, bicycle storage, or bike racks. Combined with the fact that no current MLS listings check the bike storage amenity, this strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not a feature of the building.

Remarks highlight views of the Ala Wai Golf Course and canal but do not describe any boat slips, dock access, or marina facilities. MLS data consistently omits a marina/dock amenity, indicating there is no boat dock for this building.

Parking details are given (assigned, covered, gated) but there is no mention of a car wash facility. The consistent absence of this amenity in MLS data indicates the building does not provide a car wash.

Marketing remarks emphasize the secure building, storage, and laundry but not any clubhouse or community center. MLS data uniformly leaves the clubhouse amenity unchecked, so the building almost certainly has no clubhouse.

There are zero references to concierge or front desk services in any of the 5 public remarks, and the CONCIE amenity is never selected. This consistent pattern across multiple agents strongly indicates there is no concierge service in the building.

Pet-related amenities like a dog park or dog run are never discussed in the remarks. All MLS entries omit a dog park amenity, making it very likely the building has no dedicated dog park.

None of the marketing remarks or MLS amenity fields indicate a doorman or lobby attendant. Given the strong incentive to highlight such a feature, this consistent omission strongly supports that the building does not have a doorman.

Across five King Kalani listings, there is no reference to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. MLS amenities consistently leave the exercise room box unchecked, indicating the building does not offer this feature.

Despite highlighting convenience and location, none of the listings mention any chauffeured or house car service. All MLS entries omit limo service, so the building almost certainly does not offer limousine or car service.

No listing advertises a meeting room, conference room, or hospitality room. With 0/5 MLS records marking this amenity, it is very likely the building does not provide a meeting room.

Multiple independent listings describe a lanai, including a 'large lanai' and a '104 sf lanai' with Diamond Head views. This recurring lanai description across different units shows that the building offers balcony/patio-style outdoor space in at least some units, even though agents did not use the patio/deck checkbox.

Remarks reference a nearby public jogging path along the Ala Wai Canal rather than a private jogging path belonging to the building. Since MLS data does not list a jogging/walking path amenity, the building itself does not offer a dedicated path.

The building is marketed for its Waikiki location, views, and convenience rather than family play amenities. With no references to a playground and all MLS data leaving this amenity unchecked, the building almost certainly lacks a playground.

No listing mentions a private or fenced yard, only lanais and views from a high-rise setting. Given the small 44-unit Waikiki condo configuration and lack of any yard references, this building is very unlikely to offer private yard space to units.

Although the building is near the Ala Wai Golf Course, no listing claims an on‑site putting green. MLS amenities consistently omit a putting green, strongly indicating the building does not have one.

Listings do not reference a recreation deck or common recreation area in the building. The consistent absence of this amenity in MLS data across all listings supports that the building lacks a recreation area.

The building descriptions focus on in‑unit upgrades, parking, storage, and community laundry only. With all MLS entries omitting any recreation room amenity, it is very likely none exists.

The marketing emphasizes proximity to Waikiki restaurants, not an in‑building restaurant or café. With 0/5 MLS entries marking a restaurant amenity, it is very likely the building has no on‑site restaurant.

Remarks highlight views from lanais and the building’s corner orientation but do not mention any shared rooftop access. MLS data shows no rooftop amenity selected, indicating there is no common rooftop deck.

Listings focus on storage, parking, community laundry, and unit upgrades but do not mention a sauna or steam room. With no MLS record indicating a sauna amenity, the building almost certainly lacks one.

Multiple recent remarks and MLS data confirm building storage: 4 of 6 MLS listings previously checked storage-related amenities, and the current public remarks repeatedly state 'storage lockers,' 'a dedicated storage locker,' and 'storage locker' (also noting 'tons of storage' and a 'dedicated space in the parking garage'). Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and aligns with historical checkbox data, supporting high confidence that the building offers storage units/lockers.

The building provides storage lockers/lockers per the listings, but there is no specific mention of surfboard storage facilities. Without explicit mention, surfboard storage cannot be confirmed.

No listing remarks mention tennis courts or related facilities. Every MLS record leaves the tennis court amenity unchecked, strongly indicating the building does not have tennis courts.

All 6 current MLS listings for King Kalani list 'TRACHU' (trash chute) as an amenity. None of the public remarks explicitly mention or deny a trash/garbage/refuse chute (0 remarks include phrases like 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute'), but the uniform checkbox across multiple agent listings suggests the building offers a trash chute; evidence is consistent across agents and thus strong.

Listings consistently mention assigned or gated parking stalls but never valet or valet parking. In a modest 44-unit Waikiki condo, the absence of any valet references across multiple agents strongly indicates there is no valet service.

At least 1 of 5 listings states the unit includes a 'gated, assigned parking stall,' showing that access to the parking area is controlled by a physical gate. Buyers seeking gated or fenced property access would reasonably consider this building to offer a gated feature.

The only whirlpool‑type reference is to a private jacuzzi tub inside a unit, not a common area amenity. Since MLS records do not list a whirlpool/hot tub for the building, it likely has no shared whirlpool facility.

None of the 5 listings reference a pool (no mentions of 'pool', 'swimming pool', or similar) and MLS amenity checkboxes for pool are consistently unchecked. Agents highlight other features such as community laundry on each floor, storage lockers, parking, and views, which suggests that if a pool existed it would likely be mentioned. Evidence strongly indicates this building does not offer a shared pool.

All 5 listings omit any reference to a heated pool, and MLS data shows no heated pool features checked. Given the clear absence of even a basic pool and no textual hints of a heated facility, it is highly likely the building does not have a heated pool.

There is no reference to a pool or a saltwater pool in the public remarks. Given the building context indicates no pool, we keep pool_salt as false but with low confidence since remarks simply do not mention a pool.

No listings mention in-unit laundry or a washer/dryer inside any unit, and 0/5 MLS entries check washer/dryer in the inclusions. Instead, agents consistently describe floor-by-floor laundry rooms/community laundry as the available laundry option, indicating the building does not offer in-unit laundry in its units.

Multiple listings (all 6/6 in MLS checkbox data) and the public remarks explicitly state there are shared laundry rooms on each floor (quotes include 'laundryrooms are located on each floor' and 'community laundry on each floor'). The consistency across multiple agent remarks and prior MLS checkbox data provides strong, corroborating evidence that the building has community laundry facilities.

The remarks confirm community laundry on every floor but provide no information about whether machines are coin- or card-operated. Because there is no mention of payment, we cannot confirm paid laundry and return false with low confidence.

Multiple public remarks explicitly state community laundry rooms on each floor, indicating floor-by-floor laundry availability. This is direct, repeated evidence from the listings.

All 6 MLS listings include parking in the checkbox fields, and at least five of the public remarks explicitly mention assigned or covered parking (quotes: "1 assigned parking space," "gated, assigned parking stall," "assigned, covered parking stall"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS parking_features, supporting high confidence that the building offers parking.

Remarks repeatedly highlight assigned parking: “1 assigned parking space,” “gated, assigned parking stall,” “assigned, covered parking stall,” and “Assigned parking on the lower floor.” With 4/5 MLS entries also checking ASSIGN, assigned stalls are a well-established building feature rather than a one-off.

One listing states “assigned, covered parking stall,” and another describes “a dedicated space in the parking garage,” indicating at least some stalls are covered. Combined with 3/5 MLS listings showing covered/garage options, the building clearly offers covered parking even if not every stall is covered.

Listings consistently reference an assigned/covered/dedicated stall, but nowhere do the public remarks state the stall is deeded or owned. Based on the language present, deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.

Across five separate listings, neither agents’ checkboxes nor remarks mention EV charging, Tesla chargers, or any kind of station—something that would typically be marketed if available. Given this consistent absence, it is very likely the building does not offer EV charging at this time.

I searched for terms like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', 'parking rental', or dollar amounts tied to parking. The remarks only reference an assigned stall and do not state whether any separate fee applies.

Agents discuss assigned stalls, covered parking, and a garage but never reference guest or visitor parking, despite otherwise selling the building’s conveniences. The total lack of MLS and narrative mentions across multiple listings strongly suggests the building does not provide designated guest parking.

One unit is marketed with a “gated, assigned parking stall,” and another remarks on a “secure building,” aligning with 2/5 MLS entries that mark secured entry for parking. This repeated reference to gated/secure access supports that the building’s parking area has secured entry.

Listings consistently describe just “1 assigned parking space” or “an assigned, covered parking stall,” with no mention of tandem or shared back-to-back arrangements. Combined with 0/5 MLS TANDEM selections, this strongly indicates the building does not offer tandem parking stalls.

The building is a small, 44-unit condo with assigned stalls and a garage, and agents emphasize self-parking only. The complete absence of any mention of valet service in both MLS features and remarks makes it very clear that valet parking is not available.

I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrasing. The consistent mention of an assigned stall suggests there is not a waitlist process mentioned in the public remarks.

Remarks describe an elevator only in functional terms with no mention of key/fob access or restricted floors. With ELEVAT not selected in any MLS listing, evidence points to a standard, non-keyed elevator rather than a secure/keyed system.

While listings describe gated/secure parking and a secure building, there is no explicit mention of card/fob/keycard entry systems. Therefore card-access security cannot be confirmed from the remarks.

No listing remarks reference a security guard or staffed security presence, and SECGUA is unchecked in 5/5 MLS entries. Given that guard service is a premium amenity agents nearly always highlight, this absence across multiple listings is strong evidence there is no security guard service.

Listings do not mention any security patrol or roving security service. In the absence of explicit language, security patrol is not supported by the public remarks.

No remarks across any listing reference cameras or video surveillance, and SECSYS is consistently absent from the amenity checkboxes. While some minor unadvertised cameras could exist, available data strongly indicates there is no formal/video security system as a building feature.

Across five listings, none mention or checkbox central air, and several emphasize reliance on tradewinds and breezes for cooling. One unit calls its split AC a 'rare perk in the bldg', which would be unlikely if a central system existed. This gives strong building-wide evidence that there is no central AC system.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'split AC (a rare perk in the bldg)', matching the single MLS inclusion with split AC checked. This confirms that some units in the building have split AC, so buyers seeking split systems should consider this property.

Across five separate listings, there are zero mentions or MLS checkboxes for window AC, while agents do go out of their way to highlight a rare split AC and natural cooling. This consistent absence strongly suggests that window AC units are not present or typical in the building’s units.

All 6 current MLS listings include 'CONCRE' as the construction material, matching prior high-confidence data indicating a concrete Waikiki condo tower with structured parking. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly mention construction type (0/6 mention it), but the unanimous MLS checkbox across multiple agents provides strong, consistent evidence rather than any contradictory statements.

Most MLS listings (4/5) identify double-wall construction, with no remarks suggesting otherwise. This majority, multi-agent pattern supports that the building uses double-wall construction elements.

No listing marks hollow tile construction, and nothing in the remarks suggests hollow tile usage. This supports treating hollow tile construction as not present.

MLS data and remarks lack any indication of masonry/stucco construction, while uniformly indicating concrete. This makes masonry-stucco construction unlikely for this building.

MLS data does not list steel frame on any listing, and agents uniformly describe it as a concrete condo building. This supports concluding it is not a steel-frame building for MLS purposes.

Slab construction is indicated in only one listing and is not discussed in the remarks. Given the inconsistent MLS data, it is more reliable to treat slab construction as not an identified feature here.

No analysis available

No listings identify wood frame construction, and the building type (urban concrete condo tower) is inconsistent with primary wood-frame structure. Evidence supports treating wood-frame construction as not applicable.

The above-ground flag appears only once across 5 listings and is not supported by remarks. The strong majority absence in MLS indicates this should be treated as not an above-ground construction classification.

Zero MLS indications of brick construction and no remarks about brick, combined with the building type, strongly indicate it is not a brick-constructed building.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and the high-rise condo context is incompatible with that style. Evidence strongly supports that the building is not single-wall construction.

I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', and related terms. There is no evidence in the public remarks permitting STRs, so STR allowance is not supported.

I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', and specific hotel references. Because STRs are not indicated in the remarks and no hotel pool language appears, hotel pool participation is not supported.

I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar phrases. There is no evidence of any mandatory rental-pool participation in the public remarks, and since STRs are not indicated, a mandatory pool is not applicable.

There are no explicit references to fee simple tenure in any remarks, and no listings are flagged FS in the summarized data. However, because tenure is often under-documented in remarks, this should be treated as unknown rather than a confident exclusion.

Neither the remarks nor the summarized MLS fields indicate leasehold status or lease terms. As with fee simple, the absence of evidence means the building’s leasehold status is effectively unknown, not confidently false.

I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or specific years (e.g., 2050). There is no indication the property is leasehold or any lease expiration year, so the lease expiry is unknown.

Remarks explicitly state the building is VA-approved, indicating VA financing is accepted. This is direct, unambiguous evidence from the public remarks.

Checked remarks for explicit statements about HOA-provided full/walls-in insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage') and found none. In the absence of explicit confirmation, set to false with medium confidence.

Remarks specifically reference upgraded 'fire alarm systems' but never mention sprinklers, and no listings check a sprinkler amenity. Given this consistent absence across all data, it is highly likely the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

Searched remarks for phrases indicating a passed FLSE (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection') and found none. While new fire alarm systems are mentioned, there is no explicit statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so set to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Across 5 listings, agents emphasize Diamond Head, mountain, city, and Ala Wai Golf Course views but never mention ocean views, and 0/5 MLS entries check OCEAN. The building is described as close to Waikiki Beach rather than having ocean views, indicating it is not marketed as offering ocean-view units.

Multiple listing remarks (3-4 of the provided segments) explicitly reference mountain/Ko'olau views: phrases include 'Mountain' and 'Ko'olau mountains' and 'breathtaking sunrise views.' Evidence is repeated across different listing remarks, indicating several units in the building offer mountain views.

Diamond Head is repeatedly called out in the public remarks (4 of the provided segments) with phrases like 'Beautiful DIAMOND HEAD VIEW' and 'Enjoy Diamond Head views right from your lanai,' showing consistent confirmation from multiple agents that some units have Diamond Head views.

City views are mentioned in several remarks (notably 2 of the provided segments) with explicit language 'City View !!!' and 'City View', indicating some units offer city/downtown vistas.

Although close to the beach, listings do not describe 'coastline' or 'shoreline' vistas, instead focusing on inland views (Diamond Head, mountains, golf course, city). This strongly indicates the building does not feature coastline views.

Listings focus entirely on Diamond Head, mountains, city, and golf course views without any reference to gardens or courtyards. The absence of such mentions across multiple agents indicates the building does not offer notable garden views.

Public remarks describe 'panoramic vistas of ... the Ala Wai Golf Course' from a northeast-facing corner unit. This direct description confirms that the building includes units with golf course views.

No listings explicitly describe marina/harbor/canal views. Remarks reference 'Ala-Wai' and nearby Ala Wai Canal or Ala Wai Golf Course (proximity), but do not state 'marina view,' 'harbor view,' 'yacht harbor,' or clear 'canal view' from the unit; combined with MLS checkbox absence, marina/harbor view is not supported.

Remarks for an end unit on the northeast side of the building highlight 'breathtaking sunrise views' as a selling point. This confirms that some units in the building offer sunrise views.

Agents repeatedly market sunrise and Diamond Head/mountain views but never reference sunsets or west-facing exposure. Given this pattern, the building is not presented as offering notable sunset-view units.

All location descriptions center on Waikiki Beach, Ala Wai Golf Course, the zoo, and Kapiolani Park, with no cemetery nearby mentioned. The complete absence of any cemetery-related comments supports that the building does not have cemetery views.

Listings describe multiple scenic views (Diamond Head, mountains, Ala Wai, city, golf course) and explicitly mention lanai views, but do not mention seeing fireworks from units. Absence of any fireworks-related view language prevents confirming this feature.

No analysis available

Across five listings, no remark or MLS restriction field says 'no pets' or similar, despite detailed discussion of other features and rules. While there is no explicit 'pets allowed' language, the consistent absence of pet prohibitions suggests the building generally allows pets, likely with standard condo restrictions.

Four of five MLS entries list a resident manager/on-site manager amenity, with no evidence to the contrary. This repeated checkbox usage across different listings strongly supports that the building has a resident manager.

The building is repeatedly described simply as a condo, including 'VA-approved move-in-ready condo,' with no references to hotel programs or front-desk operations. Given this and the lack of any CONDOT coding, it is almost certainly not a condotel.

All listings present the property as a standard condominium, not a cooperative, and there is no language about owning shares or co-op rules. Combined with the absence of COOTAX in the MLS, this strongly indicates it is not a co-op building.