
Kinau Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kinau Villa
Building Overview
Kinau Villa in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (1973) with ocean and sunset views; covered parking, window AC.

About Kinau Villa
Kinau Villa is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1973. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction and offers ocean and sunset views.
Key features listed in the MLS data include window air conditioning and covered parking. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the provided information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Based on MLS data analysis, these are the facts currently available; buyers should verify building details, rules, and any fees with the listing agent or building management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy statements or percentages (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no explicit numeric value in the public remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Public remarks confirm elevator access ('secure elevator access') and mention community laundry/washer-dryers on each floor, but no explicit count of elevators was provided. I searched the remarks for phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none. Without an explicit numeric statement, the exact number is unknown and cannot be changed or guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 6 MLS listings include HOTWAT in the association fee fields, while half explicitly include water heaters (WTRHTR) and one remark mentions a 'tankless water heater' in the unit. This strongly suggests hot water is provided by individual heaters, not as a building utility included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Every one of the 6 MLS entries for this building shows SEWER in the association fee inclusions, with no conflicting information in the remarks. This consistent pattern across multiple listings indicates sewer charges are covered by the maintenance fee.
The MLS data is unanimous that WATER is part of the association fee inclusions for all 6 listings, with no textual remarks contradicting this. This consistency supports that water service is included in the building's maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf lockers' or similar and found no references. There is no evidence the building offers surfboard storage.
No analysis available
A listing for this building explicitly mentions a "convenient trash chute down the hall," confirming the presence of a trash chute system. MLS data also shows 4 out of 6 listings with the TRACHU amenity checked, providing consistent multi-listing evidence. Together, this strongly indicates that the building offers a shared trash chute for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Since the building has no pool and the remarks contain no pool references, it cannot have a saltwater pool.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe shared laundry facilities, including "Washer/dryers on each floor," "Community laundry is located on each floor," and "Community laundry just outside your door." In addition, 5 of 6 current MLS entries check the community laundry amenity, indicating consistent agent reporting rather than a one-off error. Evidence strongly supports that the building offers community laundry on each floor.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'coin', 'quarters', 'card', 'paid' or 'coin-op' and found none. Listings only describe community laundry locations, with no indication a fee is required.
Multiple remarks explicitly state washer/dryers/community laundry on each floor. This directly supports that community laundry is available on every floor.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 listings, 4 have covered-type parking selected in MLS, and one remark clearly notes a '1 covered, reserved parking stall,' confirming covered parking exists in the building. Other listings either say 'Includes 1 parking' or emphasize nearby street parking, suggesting some units lack stalls but not disproving covered options. Overall evidence supports that the building offers covered parking for at least some units.
I searched for explicit language indicating deeded/owned parking (e.g., 'deeded parking', 'parking included in deed') and found none. Remarks do indicate a reserved stall is included with the unit, but there's no evidence it is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for statements like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge' or a dollar amount tied to parking and found none. Because the remarks state parking is included, no separate parking fee is indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indications of a parking waitlist or waiting list and found none. Remarks describe included/reserved parking and street parking nearby but no waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit phrases like 'key card access', 'fob', or 'card reader' and did not find them. While a new security system is mentioned, there is no explicit evidence of card/fob access.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrol service' and found none. Combined with building context (no security guard/resident manager), there is no evidence of a patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of the six current MLS listings for this building include the ACWIUN (window AC) checkbox, and one remark mentions the owners 'replacing both AC units,' implying individual room units rather than central air. While most remarks are silent on AC, the structured MLS data provides consistent evidence that at least some units in the building have window-type air conditioning. Buyers seeking buildings that allow or offer window AC units would reasonably consider this building an option.
Across the building, 5 of 6 MLS listings flag concrete construction, and none of the remarks mention any alternative primary construction type. The narrative remarks focus on location and renovations and do not contradict concrete structure, so the building is very likely of reinforced concrete construction.
No analysis available
Only 2 of 6 listings check hollow tile, compared with 5 of 6 that indicate concrete, and the public remarks never mention hollow tile walls or similar features. This inconsistent and weak signal, against a strong concrete signal, supports concluding the building is not hollow-tile construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows just 1 of 6 listings checking brick, versus 5 of 6 checking concrete, and no remarks reference brick construction or brick exterior. This pattern strongly suggests the building is not of brick construction and that the lone brick entry is a mis-click or copy/paste mistake.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for short-term rental language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental allowed', 'NUC') and found none. Absence of evidence in remarks indicates STR is not confirmed; set to false with moderate-low confidence.
I looked for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'managed by [hotel]', or hotel brand programs and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated, hotel pool participation is set to false.
I searched for language indicating a required/mandatory hotel rental pool or 'must be in rental program' and found none. With no STR or hotel pool mentioned, a mandatory pool is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit land/ground lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065') and found none. The only lease reference is a tenant lease expiration, not a land lease, so the land tenure expiry is unknown from these remarks.
I searched all remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. No evidence in remarks to confirm VA approval.
I searched the public remarks for explicit statements that the HOA or building is fully insured (walls-in/ comprehensive building insurance) and found no references. With no explicit mention, the feature is set to false with medium confidence per the rules for boolean fields when no mention and no current value exist.
No analysis available
I reviewed the public remarks for terms indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified') and found no such language. Because there is no current value provided in the remarks either, absence of mention is treated as likely not indicated; therefore set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1 of 6 listings explicitly advertises 'Enjoy OCEAN views ... from the entire condo,' indicating at least some units in the building have ocean views. This direct remark outweighs the absence of 'ocean' in the MLS view_descriptions, which agents often leave incomplete. Although another listing has 'NONE' in the view field, that only shows not all units have views, not that the building lacks ocean-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention 'city views,' but the MLS view_descriptions field shows CITY for 1 of 6 listings. Given the building’s central urban location near downtown, Kakaako, and Ward Avenue, it is reasonable to infer that some units have city/urban views, though this evidence is weaker and may reflect agent checkbox usage rather than detailed verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 6 listings explicitly says 'Enjoy OCEAN views and beautiful sunsets from the entire condo,' confirming that at least one unit enjoys sunset views, typically indicating a favorable western exposure. This direct textual evidence outweighs the lack of 'sunset' in the MLS view_descriptions and supports tagging the building as offering sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language such as 'watch fireworks from', 'fireworks view from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found no such references. The presence of ocean views does not constitute a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.