
Kinau Lanais
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kinau Lanais
Building Overview
Kinau Lanais in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1976) — concrete building with pool and mountain views.

About Kinau Lanais
Kinau Lanais is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available MLS records, it was built in 1976 and constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers on-site amenities including a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units are served by window air conditioning and some units report mountain views.
Parking is available and includes covered, assigned spaces and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS records. The management company is listed as Unknown and specific fees or association details were not provided. Buyers should verify all information, including fees, unit sizes, rules, and management, with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Some remarks reference investor suitability and tenant-occupied units, but there is no numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy rate provided. Without an explicit statement in the remarks, owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be guessed.
Remarks reference high-floor units (12th, 14th, 20th floor) and describe a high-rise building, but do not state the number of elevators. Without an explicit numeric mention in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
16 of 20 recent MLS listings list common area electricity (OTCOEX) in association_fee_includes. Public remarks for the building do not explicitly mention common-area electric billing or a change, and multiple listings reuse similar amenity language (suggesting some copy/paste), so the MLS checkbox evidence remains strong across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Despite a few MLS checkboxes for HOTWAT, the presence of in‑unit water heaters on multiple listings and the lack of any remarks saying 'hot water included in maintenance fee' point to hot water not being an association-paid utility. A single reference to a central water heater does not clearly tie it to HOA coverage. Overall, evidence supports that owners are responsible for their own hot water rather than it being included in the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate sewer is included in association fees. None of the provided public remarks state that sewer is charged separately or note a change, so the consistent MLS checkbox usage across many listings supports inclusion.
19 of 20 recent MLS listings list water as included in the association fees. While remarks note a 'central water heater,' they do not state that water is billed separately; the large, consistent number of listings with WATER checked supports inclusion despite limited explicit wording in remarks.
Strong evidence: ~15+ of the 20 current listings/public remarks explicitly state 'BBQ', 'BBQ area', or 'barbecue area' (e.g., 'BBQ areas perfect for gatherings', 'building offers ... BBQ area'). Mentions appear across many agent remarks and align with the MLS checkbox prevalence, indicating a building-level shared BBQ amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: Although only 4 of 14 MLS entries use PATDEC/COVPAT, nearly every remark emphasizes a large private lanai or balcony (often ~169 sq. ft.) accessible from living room and bedroom.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence: several listings mention 'clubhouse', 'clubhouse/rec area', or 'covered outdoor/recreation space for gathering' (roughly 4–6 listings). References are consistent across different remarks but not as pervasive as BBQ, so confidence is slightly lower but still supports including a building recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports inclusion: while explicit 'trash chute' text appears in a smaller number of the provided public remarks (one clear explicit mention), the MLS checkbox prevalence (about 15/20) and prior high-confidence history indicate the building offers a trash/garbage chute system. Multiple agents appear to have confirmed this in their listings, though some copy/paste may be present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence the building has a swimming pool: 20/20 current MLS listings include pool amenity codes and numerous public remarks reference a pool. Representative phrases include 'swimming pool', 'community pool', 'large pool', and 'resort like pool,' consistently noted across multiple agent listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry: current listings repeatedly state phrases like 'in-unit laundry', 'washer/dryer in unit', 'WASHER/DRYER IN UNIT', and 'stacked washer/dryer'. Data source indicates 18 of 20 recent listings include washer/dryer in inclusions, and multiple agents across listings mention the feature, so it is highly likely the building offers units with in-unit laundry (though agent copy/paste is possible, the volume and specificity of remarks support inclusion).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence: 16/20 recent MLS records list assigned parking and the remarks consistently state phrases like "one assigned covered parking stall", "assigned parking stall", and "assigned stall" across multiple agent listings. Evidence is consistent across many listings and unlikely to be copy-paste error.
Covered parking is consistently represented: 14 of 20 current MLS records include covered/garage parking codes and many remarks explicitly state phrases such as "assigned covered parking stall", "covered gated parking", or "secured covered parking garage." Evidence is strong and repeated across multiple listings/agents (though some language may be copy-paste), supporting that the building offers covered parking.
There is clear evidence of assigned/covered parking stalls and secured gated parking, but no explicit language that parking is deeded/owned with the unit—therefore not marked as deeded.
No analysis available
Listings explicitly mention an extra parking stall being rented at $150/month, indicating a monthly parking rental fee is available.
Strong evidence: 11/20 MLS records list guest parking and many remarks state "guest parking", "6 guest parking stalls", or "visitor parking/ample visitor parking." Multiple listings and agents reference guest stalls, supporting inclusion as a building amenity.
Confidence 95%: Though only 3 of 14 MLS listings check SECENT, remarks explicitly mention “secured gate building entry,” “gated covered parking,” “covered, secure garage,” and “Secure gated covered parking stall.”
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', and related phrases; none were found, so there is no evidence of a formal parking waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates 16 of 20 listings include ACWIUN and numerous public remarks explicitly reference window air conditioning (examples: 'window AC', 'window A/C', '2 window AC units', and 'AC unit in the living room'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than a single outlier, so the building should be listed as offering window AC units.
Strong evidence the building is concrete: 16 of 20 current MLS listings include CONCRE in construction_materials and historical data also supported concrete construction (11 of 14). Public remarks do not explicitly state 'concrete', but the consistent, multi-agent MLS reporting provides strong corroboration across listings.
Minimal support for double-wall construction: only 2 of 20 current MLS listings have DOUWAL checked and none of the public remarks reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' With no historical evidence and no remarks confirming the feature, it appears to be an isolated/erroneous checkbox rather than a building-wide attribute.
No analysis available
Across 20 listings for Kinau Lanais, only 3 show MASSTU in construction_materials and 17 do not, indicating agents generally do not consider this a masonry/stucco building. None of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. This pattern strongly suggests the MASSTU entries are sporadic input errors rather than a true description of the building’s construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', and related terms; no STR-related permissions or programs were mentioned, so STR is not indicated in the remarks.
Because the remarks contain no mention of short-term rentals or any hotel rental program, there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool.
No remarks indicate any rental pool participation—mandatory or optional—so mandatory hotel-pool participation is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease ends', and specific years; found no lease-expiry information, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Multiple listings explicitly reference VA approval and an assumable VA loan (including loan terms), confirming VA financing is available for this building.
Remarks describe amenities, maintenance fees, building services, and on-site management but never state that the HOA provides walls-in or full building insurance. With no explicit mention, the listing does not confirm full building insurance; marked false with medium confidence.
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings includes the FIRSPR amenity flag, and none of the public remarks (0/20) mention 'fire sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire suppression'. Given the lack of any textual confirmation across multiple agent remarks and the very low prevalence of the checkbox, it is most likely the building does not have a fire sprinkler system; the single checked listing appears to be an agent data entry error.
Listings highlight security, gated entry and a resident manager but do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. In absence of any remark indicating an FLSE pass, we mark as not stated (false) with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Many listing remarks for this building explicitly mention ocean or makai views — examples include "partial ocean and city views", "panoramic ocean, mountain and city views", and "ocean views from the lanai." These references appear across a majority of the unit listings (approximately 12–15 separate remarks), indicating several units have ocean views despite the MLS view_descriptions checkbox being unset.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City/downtown/skyline views are repeatedly cited across the listing remarks — phrases include "sweeping city and mountain views", "expansive city views", and "city and skyline views." These confirmations appear across many listings (roughly 15–18 remarks), matching prior high-confidence historical data and indicating the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no explicit mentions of 'sunset', 'western exposure', or similar phrasing in the provided remarks (mentions instead include 'sunrise' and 'city lights'). Given only 1/20 MLS listings historically included SUNSET and the lack of corroborating remarks here, evidence is weak and we mark sunset views as not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 15 listings explicitly mention a resident/on-site manager with phrases like "on-site resident manager", "Resident Mgr office in the lobby", and "EXCELLENT ON-SITE MANAGER", matching the historical MLS checkbox (15/20). The evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and listing descriptions, indicating the building does have an on-site resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.