Kealakai at Kapolei I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kealakai at Kapolei I
Building Overview
Kealakai at Kapolei I in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 2010; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Kealakai at Kapolei I
Kealakai at Kapolei I is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 2010. MLS-derived data does not include specific information on unit sizes or the construction type for this property.
Based on MLS data, building policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. Specific common-area amenities, utility arrangements, and on-site facilities are not listed in the available MLS information.
Management company information is recorded as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify details such as parking, maintenance fees, association rules, and any additional amenities or restrictions with listing agents or the association. This description is based on MLS data and should be independently confirmed.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no information in the remarks about the percentage of owner-occupied units. With no prior/current numeric value and no explicit statements in the remarks, owner occupancy is unknown and left null. I searched for common owner-occupancy phrases but found none.
Remarks do not mention any elevators. Because there is no prior/current numeric value and no explicit mention in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and left null. I searched the remarks for common elevator phrases but found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 listings have the OTCOEX checkbox checked in the MLS, but 0/7 public remarks mention common area electricity (no phrases like 'common area electricity' or 'building power included'). No owner/manager verifications or explicit remarks confirm this; evidence suggests checkbox was likely copied into listings without verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, but 0/7 public remarks mention 'sewer included' or similar. No corroborating language or verifications appear in the remarks, so the checkbox likely reflects agent entry rather than verified building policy.
Although the MLS shows WATER checked on all 7 listings, 0/7 public remarks reference 'water included' or 'water in HOA'. No explicit confirmation from agents/owners appears in the remarks, indicating the association_fee_includes entries are likely copy/paste rather than verified facts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS listings include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, indicating some units likely have in-unit laundry. However, none of the combined public remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer, in-unit laundry, or stacked units — suggesting agents may be relying on checkbox fields or copy/paste rather than describing the feature in remarks. Given the strong MLS checkbox signal but lack of explicit remarks or owner verification, this is included with moderate (implied) confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 MLS listings include parking feature flags and 5 of 7 public remarks explicitly mention parking (quotes: '2 assigned parking stalls', 'THREE PARKING STALLS!', 'ample street parking'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers parking.
MLS checkbox data shows 6 of 7 listings with assigned parking and 5 listings' remarks state assigned stalls (quotes: '2 assigned parking stalls', 'Enjoy the convenience of THREE assigned parking stalls'). Strong, consistent evidence that assigned parking is provided.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly reference assigned parking stalls (e.g., 'two assigned parking stalls', 'THREE assigned parking stalls'), which shows reserved/assigned spaces but not deeded ownership. Since 'deeded' is not explicitly stated in the remarks, deeded parking is assumed not indicated.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'additional parking cost' but found none. Without explicit mention, there is no evidence to state a parking fee amount or existence.
Five MLS listings include the guest-parking flag and three public remarks explicitly reference guest parking (quotes: '15+ guest parking spaces', 'lots of guest parking', 'ample guest parking'). Evidence is fairly consistent though somewhat less frequently mentioned in remarks than assigned stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms such as 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' and found none. The listings describe assigned stalls and ample guest parking but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention AC in units: 3 of the provided public remarks reference AC (two say 'AC in every room' and one explicitly says 'equipped with window A/C units'). CURRENT MLS inclusion flags show 6 out of 7 listings checked ACWIUN. The repeated remarks and widespread MLS checkbox use indicate the building offers window air conditioning units.
Only 2 of 7 MLS listings include 'CONCRE' in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention concrete or reinforced concrete. There is no prior verification and agent remarks are silent, so there is insufficient evidence to mark the building as concrete construction.
Every current MLS listing (7/7) includes the 'DOUWAL' construction_materials flag. While none of the public remarks explicitly state 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction', the unanimous MLS coding across multiple listings suggests the building offers double-wall construction (implied evidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements about short-term rental allowance (e.g., 'STR permitted', 'vacation rental allowed', '30-day minimum' language) and found none. In absence of any STR-related language, STR is marked not allowed per the remarks.
There is no reference to any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program in the remarks. Because short-term rentals are not mentioned (str_allowed=false), hotel pool participation is set to false.
The remarks contain no language about mandatory rental-pool participation or required enrollment in a hotel program. Given no STR allowance and no pool program mentions, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrasing like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', or specific years (e.g., 2050) and found no references. Because there is no explicit lease expiry year, the value is unknown.
Public remarks explicitly reference VA buyers and an assumable loan option, which indicates VA financing/VA loan availability. This is direct evidence from the listing remarks that the property supports VA-related financing.
Remarks do not state that the HOA or building is fully insured (walls-in coverage). I searched for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and found no evidence, so this is set to false with medium confidence.
Evidence that the building has fire sprinklers comes from one listing remark explicitly stating 'fire sprinkler equipped' and the MLS amenities checkbox (FIRSPR) marked in 1/7 listings. Other listings do not mention sprinklers, so the feature appears present for at least some units; the explicit phrasing and MLS flag provide reasonably strong confirmation.
Remarks reference fire sprinklers but do not state that a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) was passed. Per rules, absence of an explicit FLSE pass results in false with medium confidence. I searched for phrases like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection', and found none.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) mention sunset views or western exposure; two listings explicitly list View as NONE. Public remarks contain no phrases like 'sunset view', 'evening sun', or 'western exposure'. Given the absence of any supporting remarks and the MLS data showing no sunset view entries, there is strong evidence the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.