Kaualana Manor 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaualana Manor 1
Building Overview
Kaualana Manor 1 in McCully-Moiliili: concrete building (1969), pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Kaualana Manor 1
Based on MLS data, Kaualana Manor 1 is a concrete building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1969. The provided MLS information does not include unit count or building height/size details.
Key policies reported in MLS data include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. Construction is listed as concrete. The management company is not identified in the available MLS records.
Additional specifics commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking availability, homeowner association fees, maintenance assessments, utilities, or detailed amenity listings — are not included in the MLS data provided. Prospective buyers should verify parking, fee, and management details with the listing agent or seller, and confirm all information independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit percentages or descriptive phrases indicating owner-occupancy in the public remarks and found no information. Because there is no numeric/current value and no evidence in the remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be estimated.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like 'four elevators' or 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because there is no current numeric value to retain and no explicit statement in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is covered, but none of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing. Evidence primarily comes from repeated MLS checkbox entries and appears possibly copy-pasted by agents, so inclusion is retained with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes indicating sewer is included in fees, but none of the public remarks mention 'sewer included' or similar. The conclusion is driven by consistent MLS checkbox entries across listings (which may be copy-pasted), so sewer is marked included with moderate confidence.
All 8 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes indicating water is included in maintenance fees, but none of the public remarks mention 'water included' or related language. The evidence relies on consistent MLS checkbox data across agents (potentially copy-pasted), so water is retained as included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks make no reference to surfboard storage or similar amenities. I searched for relevant terms and found nothing indicating dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings for this building list TRACHU in the amenities (previously 7/7), but none of the public remarks contain the phrases 'trash chute', 'garbage chute' or 'refuse chute'. MLS checkbox consistency supports the feature, but lack of any public-remarks confirmation across multiple agents suggests possible copy/paste; included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no pool at the property per the building context and the remarks contain no pool-related information, so a saltwater pool does not exist.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared/community laundry: MLS amenities indicate COMLAU in 7 of 8 current listings and at least three public remarks explicitly state shared laundry (quotes include "laundry facilities conveniently located on the same floor," "laundry facilities on each floor," and "Community Laundry on each floor"). Multiple agents/remarks and consistent MLS checkbox data provide high confidence that the building offers community laundry facilities.
Remarks repeatedly note laundry facilities but do not specify whether they are coin-operated or require payment. I searched for terms like 'coin', 'quarters', 'card', 'paid', and 'coin-op' and found no indication of paid laundry.
Public remarks explicitly state laundry facilities are located on each floor in multiple places. This is direct evidence that the building has community laundry on every floor.
All 8 current MLS listings include parking features and none list 'NONE'. Agent remarks repeatedly mention parking (e.g., '1 parking', '1 covered parking stall'), showing strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings rather than isolated or copy-pasted entries.
All 8 listings indicate assigned parking in the MLS checkbox and agent remarks commonly state '1 assigned parking stall', 'deeded parking stall', or 'assigned and covered parking'. This is strongly supported across multiple agent remarks and MLS data, consistent with prior high confidence.
Some units have covered stalls: 2 listings explicitly state covered parking ('1 covered assigned parking stall' and 'One assigned and covered parking located near entry'). Other listings mention parking without specifying covered; evidence indicates covered parking exists for at least some stalls but is not universal across all units.
Several remarks explicitly state the parking is deeded or assigned (e.g., 'deeded parking stall' and 'assigned parking stall'), supporting that parking is owned/associated with the unit.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and similar terms; nothing in the remarks references any parking fee. Because parking is described as deeded/assigned, no fee is indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrasing; found no references. Absence of any mention suggests there is no parking waitlist noted in the public remarks.
No analysis available
While the property is described as secured, the remarks do not explicitly state that entry is via card/fob. I searched for terms indicating electronic card/fob access and found none.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for indications of an on-site or roving security patrol and found no references. Absence of mention suggests the building does not have a security patrol noted in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings for the building list ACWIUN in inclusions, indicating units have window air conditioning units, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'window AC' or 'window unit'. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents (8/8 MLS entries) though remarks do not confirm, so inclusion is warranted for buyers searching for window AC units.
The MLS construction_materials checkbox is set to 'CONCRE' in 8/8 current listings for this building, but 0/8 public remarks explicitly mention concrete (no phrases like 'concrete construction' or 'reinforced concrete' found). Evidence is consistent across agents' MLS data (suggesting the building is concrete), but absence of remarks and past medium confidence imply a moderate (not definitive) confidence level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms indicating STR permission or restrictions (NUC, TVU, 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', etc.) and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, STR is set to false with medium confidence.
No remarks reference a hotel rental pool or hotel management program. Because short-term rentals are not mentioned/assumed not allowed in the remarks, hotel pool participation is set to false.
No evidence that the building participates in a mandatory rental pool or requires owner participation. Given STR is not indicated, mandatory pool is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing repeatedly calls this a fee simple unit, so leasehold expiration is not applicable. Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', and 'leasehold expiring' but found no years mentioned.
Remarks explicitly state the building/unit is VA loan approved. This is direct evidence from the public remarks that VA financing is accepted.
I searched the remarks for statements about the HOA or building being fully insured (walls-in coverage) and found none. In the absence of any explicit claim and no existing true value, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification and found no references. With no explicit mention and no prior true value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence in the public remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of seven listing remarks explicitly mention mountain views (e.g., 'this unit has mountain views', 'private lanai offers mountain and city views', 'Diamond Head view from useable lanai'). Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents rather than a single copy/paste, indicating the building does offer mountain views to some units.
No analysis available
Several listing remarks explicitly advertise city views: 3 of the 8 remarks state city views (phrases include 'private lanai with city views', 'private lanai offers mountain and city views', and 'nice city view'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence data, so the building should be marked as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks mention city, mountain, and Diamond Head views but do not state that fireworks can be viewed from the building or units. I searched for phrases like 'fireworks', 'watch fireworks from lanai', and similar and found none.
No analysis available
Four of seven current MLS listings for this building include the RESMAN amenity, but none of the public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. Evidence is mixed—multiple agents checked the RESMAN box (some listings), but the absence of any explicit remarks suggests possible copy/paste; therefore the building likely offers an on-site/resident manager, but with only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.