Kaualana Manor 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaualana Manor 1
Building Overview
Kaualana Manor 1 in McCully-Moiliili: concrete building (1969), pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Kaualana Manor 1
Based on MLS data, Kaualana Manor 1 is a concrete building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1969. The provided MLS information does not include unit count or building height/size details.
Key policies reported in MLS data include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. Construction is listed as concrete. The management company is not identified in the available MLS records.
Additional specifics commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking availability, homeowner association fees, maintenance assessments, utilities, or detailed amenity listings — are not included in the MLS data provided. Prospective buyers should verify parking, fee, and management details with the listing agent or seller, and confirm all information independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no information in the public remarks about the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because no numeric or descriptive owner-occupancy data exists in the remarks or prior data, the owner_occupancy is unknown. If a verified percentage is available from an owner or management, it should be entered to replace this null.
No explicit elevator count is provided in the public remarks. Because there is no prior numeric value to retain and no explicit statement in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown. I searched the entire remarks for any elevator-related language and found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is covered. None of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing, so the evidence rests on consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents and may reflect copy/paste, but consistent MLS data supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes indicating sewer is included in maintenance fees. The public remarks for the listings do not mention 'sewer included' or similar; the conclusion is based on consistent MLS checkbox entries across listings.
All 7 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes indicating water is included in maintenance fees. No public remarks mention 'water included' or similar; inclusion is supported by uniform MLS entries but lacks corroborating remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or combined bike/surfboard storage. The remarks do not mention any surfboard storage facility, so this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
All 7 active MLS listings for this building list TRACHU in amenities (7/7). None of the public remarks mention a "trash chute", "garbage chute" or "refuse chute", so this appears to be an MLS-checked amenity without corroborating remarks—possibly copy/paste—warranting moderate (0.75) confidence until further verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The provided building context explicitly states there is no pool, and the public remarks contain no pool references. Therefore a saltwater pool does not exist (kept false with low confidence due to lack of any remark).
No analysis available
MLS amenities indicate community laundry in 6 of 7 listings and at least three separate public remarks explicitly mention shared laundry ('laundry facilities conveniently located on the same floor,' 'laundry facilities on each floor,' 'Community Laundry on each floor'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of building-level shared laundry.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'coin', 'quarters', 'card', 'paid', or 'coin-op' describing laundry. There is no indication the community laundry requires payment; absence of mention leads to a medium-confidence false.
Public remarks explicitly state there are laundry facilities on each floor (multiple listings/lines repeat this). This is direct evidence so the feature is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple agent remarks: at least 6-7 listings mention assigned/deeded/reserved stalls, with phrases like '1 assigned parking stall', 'deeded parking stall', and 'assigned and covered parking'. Current MLS checkbox data also indicates ASSIGN for all 7 listings, so assigned parking is very likely a building feature.
Some units have covered stalls: 2 listings explicitly state covered parking ('1 covered assigned parking stall' and 'One assigned and covered parking located near entry'). Other listings mention parking without specifying covered; evidence indicates covered parking exists for at least some stalls but is not universal across all units.
One remark explicitly states the parking stall is deeded and other remarks consistently reference an assigned/covered parking stall, which supports that parking is deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', etc. None of the remarks reference any parking fee; only assigned/deeded parking is mentioned. Therefore monthly parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrasing related to parking but found no references. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist, but this is not definitive.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', 'keycard', or similar terms. While the property is described as 'secured', there is no explicit mention of card/fob access, so this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for indications of on-site or roving security patrols. The remarks do not reference any patrol service, so this feature is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings list ACWIUN in the inclusions, indicating units have window AC units, but none of the public remarks mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or similar. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings (likely copy/paste of MLS checkbox) so inclusion is implied but not explicitly documented in remarks.
All 7 current MLS listings for this building have the construction_materials checkbox set to 'CONCRE', but none of the seven public remarks explicitly describe the building as concrete or 'reinforced concrete'. Because the only evidence is consistent MLS checkbox data (possible agent copy/paste) and no owner/site verification or explicit remarks, include the feature with moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating STR permission or restrictions (NUC, TVU, '30-day minimum', 'vacation rental', etc.) and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, STR is assumed not allowed (medium confidence).
No remarks reference any hotel rental pool or hotel management program. Because short-term rentals are not mentioned/assumed not allowed, hotel pool participation is also set to false.
No evidence in the remarks of a mandatory rental pool or required participation. Given no STR program is referenced, mandatory pool is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing explicitly calls this a fee simple unit, so leasehold expiration is not applicable. I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', or a 4-digit expiry year and found none.
Remarks explicitly state the building is VA loan approved. This is direct evidence from the public remarks indicating VA financing is accepted.
The remarks do not state that the HOA or building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. With no explicit mention and no prior value, this field is set to false with medium confidence. User/owner verification would supersede this if provided.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. Per the rules for boolean fields with no current value and no mention, this is set to false with medium confidence (absence = likely not stated). If there is verified owner/manager input or another listing that explicitly states FLSE passed, that should override this.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of seven listing remarks explicitly mention mountain views (e.g., 'this unit has mountain views', 'private lanai offers mountain and city views', 'Diamond Head view from useable lanai'). Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents rather than a single copy/paste, indicating the building does offer mountain views to some units.
No analysis available
Three of seven listing remarks explicitly mention city views (e.g., 'private lanai with city views', 'private lanai offers mountain and city views', 'nice city view above the homes below'). Multiple listings note city vistas, indicating some units in the building have city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar. The remarks describe city, mountain, and Diamond Head views but make no claims about fireworks, so this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Four of seven current MLS listings for this building include the RESMAN amenity, but none of the public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. Evidence is mixed—multiple agents checked the RESMAN box (some listings), but the absence of any explicit remarks suggests possible copy/paste; therefore the building likely offers an on-site/resident manager, but with only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.