Kapiolani Townhouse
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Townhouse
Building Overview
Kapiolani Townhouse in Ala Moana-Kakaako: 1965 concrete building with ocean and mountain views, pool and resident manager on site.
About Kapiolani Townhouse
Kapiolani Townhouse is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1965 and is of concrete construction. Listed features include ocean and mountain views.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided data.
Parking is available and is noted as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and management information, with official documents or the managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators like a percentage (for example, "80% owner occupied") or descriptions such as majority owner-occupied. The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy statistic or comparable language. Because this is a numeric field and no evidence is present, the value cannot be determined from the remarks.
I searched the remarks for an explicit number of elevators or wording like "multiple elevators." The listings confirm elevator access, but none state how many elevators the building has. Because this is a numeric field and no count appears in the remarks, the exact value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included or billed through the association in this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "$55/month cable fee" and one notes it as a line item on the maintenance fee statement, which is stronger than a copied checkbox. Historical MLS data also supports this with CABTV marked in 7 of 15 listings.
Common-area or other common expenses are consistently shown as included. The current remarks explicitly mention the fee covers "other common expenses," and the MLS checkbox data is also strong, with OTCOEX present in 12 of 15 listings. This looks like building-level information repeated across agents rather than a one-off claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS history is strongly negative for HOTWAT and instead often lists WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that the building is not supplying hot water centrally. Current remarks also mention water heaters being replaced or installed in-unit, reinforcing that conclusion.
Internet service is included through the building/cable package. Several remarks explicitly state that the cable fee includes internet service through Spectrum, which is a direct confirmation rather than an inference. The MLS data also supports this with INTSER checked in 7 of 15 listings.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Multiple recent listings explicitly say the fees cover "water, sewer" or "water, sewer, cable, internet," which strongly confirms the MLS data rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. Evidence is consistent across several remarks, so confidence is very high.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Several listings explicitly mention water being covered alongside sewer and other common expenses, which strongly supports the feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears reliable rather than speculative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are strongly supported for Kapiolani Townhouse. At least two remarks explicitly list "car wash area" / "carwash area" among the building amenities, which aligns with the high current MLS checkbox rate. This appears to be a real shared building amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for patio/deck features. At least 11 listings in the provided remarks reference outdoor areas such as 'balcony,' 'lanai,' 'covered lanai,' 'open lanai,' and 'two enclosed lanais.' The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a real and recurring building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence suggests Kapiolani Townhouse has a shared recreation/amenity area. One listing explicitly says "Amenities: Pool, rec area, community laundry," and another describes a "lounge area" with resident manager and community herb garden. The repeated amenity-style wording across listings supports this as a building feature rather than a one-off unit detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: 5/11 MLS listings show storage in amenities and 4/11 in unit_features, and multiple remarks mention 'additional storage,' 'extra storage ~8'x4'x2',' 'exclusive extra storage shared with only one other unit,' and 'Amenities include, pool, storage, trash chute...' indicating building-provided storage areas tied to units.
I searched for dedicated surfboard storage or combined bike-and-surf storage. The remarks only mention general storage and extra storage, not surfboard-specific storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is well supported for this building. One listing explicitly says "Amenities include, pool, storage, trash chute, community laundry and carwash area," and the MLS data shows TRACHU in a strong majority of listings. This is consistent across the current remarks and the historical amenity pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for Kapiolani Townhouse. Multiple current listings explicitly mention a "swimming pool" or "pool" as a building amenity, including phrases like "Amenities include, swimming pool" and "Amenities: Pool, rec area, community laundry." The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect an actual shared building amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
I checked for any indication that the pool is salt water, including phrases like "saltwater pool" or "salt pool." The building has a pool, but the remarks do not specify the water type.
Strong evidence that Kapiolani Townhouse has some units with in-unit laundry. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it, using phrases such as 'washer and dryer are included in the unit,' 'legal, permitted new full-size washer/dryer was installed,' and 'WASHER/DRYER COMBINATION JUST INSTALLED!!!' The consistency across multiple remarks supports that this is a genuine feature rather than copy-paste MLS data.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms the building has shared laundry facilities. At least 5+ remarks explicitly mention "community laundry" or "laundry facilities," and the MLS amenity checkbox is frequently set to COMLAU, indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
I looked for signs that shared laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or a laundry fee. The public remarks mention community laundry and in-unit washer/dryer options, but nothing indicating paid laundry.
I searched for explicit wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar phrases. The remarks only mention community laundry/laundry facilities in general, not that they are available on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "assigned parking," "one prime, covered and secured parking stall," and "one assigned covered and secured parking stall," indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is very well supported by the remarks. Several listings explicitly describe covered or garage parking, including "one prime, covered and secured parking stall," "1 covered parking in secured garage," and "1 covered full size parking stall in gated garage," showing strong consistent evidence across agents.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only indicate assigned/covered/secured parking, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, monthly parking charges, or a dollar amount tied specifically to parking. The only fee mentioned is a $55 cable charge, so no parking fee can be extracted from the remarks.
No analysis available
Secured parking/access is well supported by the remarks and historical data. Listings mention "secured and secured parking stall," "secured garage," "gated garage," and building "secured entry," indicating this is a shared building feature rather than a unit-specific note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the list for parking. Nothing like that appears in the remarks, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card- or fob-based access language such as keycard entry or electronic card readers. The listings describe secured access and secured elevator access, but do not explicitly say the building uses card/fob security.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to patrol service or roving security. The remarks mention secured access and a resident manager, but nothing about a security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 16 of 16 listings checking CONCRE. No remarks suggest otherwise, so this appears to be stable building-level information rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
There is no explicit mention of double-wall construction in the public remarks, and only 5 of 14 current MLS listings check DOUWAL. That pattern suggests the flag is likely an agent-entered inconsistency or copy-paste error rather than a confirmed building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in a small subset of MLS records (2 of 16), but no public remarks mention it explicitly. This is enough to keep it as a possible building feature for buyers, though the evidence is much weaker than for concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, but found none. There is also no evidence in the remarks suggesting short-term rentals are allowed at this building.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar program references and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must also be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Because there is no evidence of STR being allowed, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, renewed through, or a specific expiry year, but found nothing. Based on the remarks provided, the lease expiry year cannot be determined.
The listings directly confirm VA financing approval for Kapiolani Townhouse. This appears multiple times in the public remarks, so confidence is very high.
The remarks explicitly describe full hurricane coverage/insurance, which is strong public-remarks evidence of comprehensive building insurance. This is consistent across multiple listings and supports a high-confidence true value. While the wording is hurricane-specific, it clearly indicates full insurance coverage being referenced by the listings.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for any fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE and fire inspection pass statements. Nothing in the provided remarks confirms that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. With no evidence present, this is treated as not confirmed in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are clearly present in the building. At least 4-5 listings explicitly mention 'beautiful mountain views,' 'panoramic mountain views,' 'breathtaking views of lush mountains,' and 'mauka-facing' units. Current MLS data also shows MOUNTA in 6/15 listings, so this appears to be a genuine feature available in some units.
No analysis available
City views are clearly present in the building. Multiple listings mention 'sweeping city views,' 'breathtaking city views,' and 'city skyline,' which aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment. With 9/15 current MLS listings showing CITY in view descriptions, this is a solid building-level amenity that buyers should know about.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly mention sunrise or morning-sun exposure, including phrases like "sunrise views from the balcony," "east-facing view," and "welcome the morning sun." This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be genuine unit/view variation rather than copy-paste noise. Include sunrise views for the building.
No listings (0/13) mention sunset or western/exposure phrases; remarks consistently describe 'east-facing' or 'mauka-facing' units with 'morning sun' and 'mountain views.' Given prior High confidence that sunset views were absent and the complete lack of current remarks indicating evening/western views, the building should be marked as not offering sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to being able to see fireworks from the building or unit. The remarks discuss city, mountain, ocean, and sunrise views, but do not mention fireworks views.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by both the MLS data and multiple current listing remarks. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention an 'on-site property manager' / 'resident manager,' and the MLS amenities checkbox is present in 13 of 16 listings, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.