Kapiolani Townhouse
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Townhouse
Building Overview
Kapiolani Townhouse in Ala Moana-Kakaako: 1965 concrete building with ocean and mountain views, pool and resident manager on site.
About Kapiolani Townhouse
Kapiolani Townhouse is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1965 and is of concrete construction. Listed features include ocean and mountain views.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided data.
Parking is available and is noted as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and management information, with official documents or the managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy indicators, including numeric percentages and qualitative phrases like majority owner-occupied or highly owner-occupied. None of the listings provide that information. Since no explicit percentage is available, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit number of elevators, including phrases like "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators." The listings confirm the building has elevator access, but none state how many elevators are in the building. Because no count is provided, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: 6/11 MLS listings check cable included, and multiple remarks describe a building-wide cable package, e.g. '$55/month cable fee applies and includes internet service' and 'maintenance fee covers ... cable, internet, and other common area expenses.' This indicates a bulk cable service arranged through the association, even if itemized separately on statements.
MLS checkbox data is consistent: 11 of 13 listings list other common expenses as included. Several remarks explicitly state "maintenance fee covers ... other common area expenses," which supports inclusion of common-area utilities. One listing says "electricity is billed separately," likely referring to unit electricity, but overall evidence from multiple agents and the MLS flags is strong that common-area electric is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to hot water not being included. Across the supplied listings, none of the MLS records mark HOTWAT as included, while many mention individual water heaters or a newly installed washer/dryer, which is consistent with unit-level hot water equipment rather than building-provided hot water. There are no remarks explicitly stating that maintenance fees cover hot water.
Confidence 95%: 6/11 MLS entries include internet, and remarks explicitly tie internet to a building package: '$55/month cable fee applies and includes internet service through Spectrum' and 'maintenance fee covers water, sewer, cable, internet, and other common area expenses.'
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence shows sewer is included. The MLS data has SEWER in 12/14 listings, and remarks directly say things like “the maintenance fee covers water, sewer” and “maintenance fees include water, sewer.” The consistency across multiple listings and agents makes this highly reliable.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows WATER in 12/14 listings, and several remarks explicitly state that the fees cover water, including phrases like “maintenance fee covers water” and “maintenance fees include water.” This is consistent across multiple listings and does not appear to be a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows CRWSH in 8 of 14 listings, and multiple current remarks explicitly mention 'car wash area' or 'carwash area' among building amenities. This looks consistent across several listings, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Agent remarks across the portfolio repeatedly reference lanais and covered lanais—phrases include 'two enclosed lanais', 'spacious private lanai', 'another huge open lanai', and 'covered lanai'. At least 8–10 separate listing remarks explicitly mention a lanai or covered lanai, indicating multiple units (and thus the building) offer patio/deck space; the evidence is consistent across different listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mentioned explicitly in at least 2 listings: 'Amenities: Pool, rec area, community laundry' and other remarks reference a lounge/amenity area. Evidence is moderate — a few agents explicitly list a rec area, but the MLS amenity checkbox is only checked on 2 of 13 listings, suggesting implied/partial support rather than building-wide confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: 5/11 MLS listings show storage in amenities and 4/11 in unit_features, and multiple remarks mention 'additional storage,' 'extra storage ~8'x4'x2',' 'exclusive extra storage shared with only one other unit,' and 'Amenities include, pool, storage, trash chute...' indicating building-provided storage areas tied to units.
I looked for dedicated surfboard storage or combined bike-and-surf storage references. The listings mention general extra storage and community amenities, but nothing specific to surfboard storage.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: 10 of 13 current MLS entries list TRACHU and several public remarks explicitly include 'trash chute' ('Amenities include... trash chute, community laundry and carwash area'). Historical analysis also rated this feature highly, and current remarks and checkboxes strongly confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly say "swimming pool" or "Amenities include, pool," and at least several remarks pair it with other shared amenities like secured entry, lounge area, and community laundry. The MLS amenity checkbox is uniformly set across 14/14 current listings, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I checked for wording like salt water pool, saltwater pool, saline pool, or salt pool. The building has a pool, but the public remarks do not identify the pool type.
Strong evidence that Kapiolani Townhouse has some units with in-unit laundry. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it, using phrases such as 'washer and dryer are included in the unit,' 'legal, permitted new full-size washer/dryer was installed,' and 'WASHER/DRYER COMBINATION JUST INSTALLED!!!' The consistency across multiple remarks supports that this is a genuine feature rather than copy-paste MLS data.
High-confidence evidence that the building has shared laundry: historical MLS data showed COMLAU checked in the majority of listings, and in the current public remarks at least nine separate listing remarks explicitly mention 'community laundry', 'community laundry facilities', 'on-site laundry facilities', or 'laundry facilities' (e.g., 'Building amenities include ... community laundry facilities', 'Amenities include ... community laundry and carwash area', 'on-site laundry facilities'). Multiple agents and listings consistently reference the shared laundry amenity, indicating it is a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
I searched for signs that the shared laundry is paid, including coin laundry, card access for machines, quarters, or a laundry charge. The listings mention community laundry and on-site laundry, but they do not state that use requires payment.
I looked for explicit wording such as "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The remarks only mention general community laundry facilities and on-site laundry, which does not confirm that every floor has its own laundry room.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings that parking is assigned/reserved in this building. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned parking" and "one assigned covered and secured parking stall," which looks consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is repeatedly confirmed in the public remarks. Several listings mention "covered parking," "one prime, covered and secured parking stall," and "secured garage," showing this is a building-level feature available to buyers.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings consistently mention assigned or included stalls, but not deeded ownership, so this is best treated as false based on the available remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee wording, monthly parking charges, or any dollar amount tied specifically to parking. The remarks mention a cable fee and maintenance fees, but nothing indicating a parking charge.
No analysis available
There is strong multi-listing evidence that the parking area has secured access. Remarks reference "secured and secured parking stall," "secured garage," "gated garage," and building "secured entry," indicating this is not just a checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as "waiting list," "join waitlist," or similar phrasing. The public remarks only describe assigned parking stalls and do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card-based access terms such as keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access. The listings support that the building is secured, but they do not specifically indicate a card or fob security system.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related wording like security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The remarks mention secured entry and an on-site property manager, but nothing about patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building feature. Current MLS data is unanimous at 14/14 listings showing CONCRE, and none of the public remarks contradict that. The evidence is strong and looks consistent across multiple listings rather than copy-paste noise.
There is no explicit mention of double-wall construction in the public remarks, and only 5 of 14 current MLS listings check DOUWAL. That pattern suggests the flag is likely an agent-entered inconsistency or copy-paste error rather than a confirmed building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or minimum-stay rules. Nothing in the remarks supports STR use, so this is set to false based on absence of evidence.
I looked for hotel pool references like Hilton pool, hotel rental program, or managed-by-hotel wording. There is no evidence of any hotel pool participation, and since STR is not supported, this must be false.
I searched for phrasing such as must participate, required rental program, cannot opt out, or similar mandatory-pool language. None was found in the remarks, and with no STR evidence, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, lease ends, renewed through, or expires in a specific year. No such information appeared in the public remarks, so the expiry year remains unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly confirm VA approval for Kapiolani Townhouse. This is direct, explicit evidence from multiple listings, so the feature is set to true with very high confidence.
The remarks clearly indicate comprehensive insurance coverage, specifically full hurricane coverage/insurance for the building. That is strong public-remarks evidence consistent with being fully insured. Confidence is high because the wording is explicit and repeated across listings.
No analysis available
I searched for public-remarks language indicating the building passed fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection approval, such as FLSE passed, life safety compliant, or fire safety certified. Nothing in the provided remarks references that status. With no explicit evidence, this is marked false by default under the requested rules.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are clearly present in the building. Across the public remarks, at least 3-4 listings explicitly mention "sweeping city views," "city skyline," or "breathtaking city views," while other units mention mountain views instead, showing that view type varies by unit. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be genuine listing content rather than a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/13) mention sunset or western/exposure phrases; remarks consistently describe 'east-facing' or 'mauka-facing' units with 'morning sun' and 'mountain views.' Given prior High confidence that sunset views were absent and the complete lack of current remarks indicating evening/western views, the building should be marked as not offering sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for statements like seeing Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building. The remarks describe city, mountain, ocean peek-a-boo, and general neighborhood views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: 11 of 13 current MLS listings list RESMAN and several agent remarks explicitly mention an on-site/resident manager. Example quotes include "resident manager" and "A friendly on-site property manager resides in the building and takes excellent care of the property," indicating the building has a resident/on-site manager and the mentions appear across multiple listings rather than a single outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.