Kapiolani Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Terrace
Building Overview
Kapiolani Terrace in Ala Moana-Kakaako (1973) — concrete building with pool and resident manager. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Kapiolani Terrace
Kapiolani Terrace is located in the Ala Moana–Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1973. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count information are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key features documented in MLS include an on-site pool and a resident manager. Units use window air conditioning. No additional common-area amenities are listed in the provided data.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The MLS indicates pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details independently with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There are no references to owner-occupancy levels in the public remarks. I searched for explicit percentages and phrases indicating high owner-occupancy but found no evidence, so the owner-occupancy percentage cannot be determined from the remarks.
Multiple listings mention elevators and that they were updated/secured/keyed, but none provide a numeric count. I searched for explicit counts (e.g., '4 elevators', 'two elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found no such phrasing, so a numeric value cannot be determined from remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 20 recent listings have OTCOEX checked in association_fee_includes, indicating many agents list common-area electricity as included. However, multiple public remarks explicitly state 'Electricity is sub-metered,' suggesting units pay their own power (agents may be inconsistently copying checkboxes). Evidence is mixed across agents, so inclusion is marked with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent MLS listings have HOTWAT checked in association_fee_includes and there are no listings showing individual water heaters (WTRHTR=0/20). Public remarks in the current batch do not explicitly state 'hot water included', so the evidence is primarily from consistent MLS checkbox data rather than agent remarks. Given the historical consistency across listings, maintain that hot water is included (high confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that sewer is included in maintenance fees: 18 of 20 recent MLS listings had SEWER checked and several public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or reference sewer work ('sewer re-piping completed'). Multiple agents across listings mention it, so the building-level feature is well supported.
Strong evidence that water is included in maintenance fees: 19 of 20 recent MLS listings had WATER checked and several public remarks explicitly state 'water included' (notably 'water, and sewer included'). The consistency across many listings and agents supports high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 listings explicitly mention a shared deck amenity, using phrases like “swimming pool deck” and “pool and large recreational deck on the fourth floor,” indicating a common recreation/pool deck area for residents. Combined with 7/20 MLS entries checking PATDEC/COVPAT, this provides strong, multi-agent evidence that the building offers a deck-style outdoor amenity accessible to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several remarks reference a shared recreation area, e.g. 'The pool and large recreation deck are located on the 4th floor' and 'a pool and large recreational deck on the fourth floor overlooking Diamond Head Crater.' At least 4 separate listings describe this amenity deck plus the MLS data (11/20 with RECARE) aligns, indicating a common recreation area for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention building storage — e.g., "bike/surfboard storage," "surfboard and Bike storage," and "storage cage on the first floor," and one unit notes an "extra movable storage unit within the unit." These references appear in several (≈7) of the provided public remarks and align with the MLS amenities checkbox (2/20) and a unit feature (1/20), indicating the building offers storage/lockers.
Multiple listings explicitly describe surfboard storage facilities (often combined with bike storage) on the first floor. I searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage' and found repeated explicit references.
No analysis available
Strong historical MLS evidence (TRACHU checked on 19/20 listings) paired with multiple current public remarks confirming a building trash chute. At least seven individual listing remarks explicitly mention 'trash chute' or 'trash chute on each floor' (phrases quoted above), appearing across different agent listings rather than a single isolated entry, supporting high confidence that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool: at least 7+ current listing remarks explicitly mention a pool — phrases include 'resident pool', 'sparkling pool', 'swimming pool deck', and 'pool and large recreation deck on the fourth floor'. This, combined with prior MLS checkbox consistency (20/20 listings), provides high confidence the building offers a common swimming pool.
No analysis available
The building's pool is repeatedly mentioned, but there is no explicit mention that it is a saltwater pool. Absence of salt-related terms in remarks suggests the pool is not confirmed salt water.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has shared laundry facilities: approximately 17–19 listing remarks explicitly state community/coin-operated laundry or 'laundry on each floor' (e.g., 'Community coin-operated laundry center is conveniently located on each floor', 'Laundry facilities located on each floor', 'clean community laundry for each floor', 'coin laundry is available on each floor'). Multiple agents reference the same building-level amenity across different listings, indicating the feature is real and widely advertised (some individual units note in-unit W/D, but building-level shared laundry is repeatedly documented).
Listings explicitly describe the community laundry as coin-operated/paid in multiple places. I searched for terms like 'coin laundry' and found clear, repeated references.
Public remarks explicitly state laundry on each floor in multiple listings. I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor' and found repeated explicit mentions confirming floor-by-floor community laundry.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for assigned parking: 18 of 20 current MLS listings indicate assigned parking and multiple remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking' or 'one assigned covered parking stall.' Mentions come from multiple agent listings rather than a single copy/paste, supporting high confidence that the building offers assigned stalls.
Strong evidence for covered parking: 17 of 20 MLS records list covered/garage parking and many public remarks say 'covered parking' or 'one covered parking stall' (e.g., 'assigned covered parking stall', 'covered and secured parking'), indicating covered parking is a building feature.
Multiple listings consistently describe parking as 'assigned' or 'assigned covered parking stall', indicating allocated/assigned stalls rather than deeded (owned) parking. Therefore parking_deeded is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', 'additional parking cost' and similar phrases; none were present. Because remarks indicate assigned covered parking is provided, no parking fee amount is stated.
No analysis available
Good evidence for secured parking/entry: 12 of 20 MLS listings include secured-entry flags and many remarks reference 'secured', 'gated parking', 'keyed entry', 'fob required entry', or 'secured garage.' The repeated mentions across different listings support inclusion of secured entry as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist' and found none; remarks instead emphasize assigned covered stalls. Absence of waitlist language leads to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe key/fob/keyed access and secured entry. I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'keyed elevator' and found several clear mentions indicating card/fob-style security.
No analysis available
Listings describe secured entry, cameras, and a resident manager but do not mention any security patrol or roving patrol service. Absence in remarks indicates no confirmed security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building uses window air conditioning: the MLS ACWIUN inclusion is set in 19 of 20 listings and multiple agent remarks explicitly say 'window A/C' or 'Window-Type AC Unit'. Remarks also reference exterior A/C sleeves and uniform A/C metal crates, supporting that window units (or sleeves for them) are installed across the building rather than isolated to a single unit.
All 20 current MLS listings for this building list construction_materials=CONCRE (20/20). None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type (no phrases like "concrete construction" or "reinforced concrete"), suggesting agents didn't add material details to remarks, but the uniform MLS checkbox across multiple listings from different agents provides strong evidence the building is concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 MLS listings show construction_materials=ABOGRO and there are no remarks stating 'above ground' construction or describing a recent change. With no supporting remarks and low/absent historical confidence, the ABOGRO tag appears to be an inconsistent agent entry and is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for explicit STR-related language and programs; none were found. Without explicit authorization in remarks, set STR allowed to false with medium confidence.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed rental references and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated in the remarks, hotel pool participation is false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found no such language. With no STR program indicated, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and any 4-digit expiry year; none were found. Because there is no leasehold language, the expiry year is unknown.
Reviewed all public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. In absence of any explicit statement, set to false with medium confidence.
Multiple listings explicitly state the building has full/100% hurricane insurance coverage and refer to the building as 'fully insured', indicating walls-in/HOA comprehensive insurance coverage according to public remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state that Kapiolani Terrace passed the fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE), including a 2022 life-safety evaluation reference. This provides strong evidence that the building has passed its FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are explicitly mentioned in at least 3 listings: "panoramic city & mountain views", "preferred mauka (mountain) side", and "overlooking Diamond Head Crater." Current MLS data likewise shows 3 of 20 listings with MOUNTA in view_descriptions, indicating some units offer mountain views even though this feature was previously unrecorded.
No analysis available
City views are referenced across multiple listings (e.g., "panoramic city & mountain views", "Enjoy beautiful city views", "city views"), with MLS data indicating 6 of 20 listings mention CITY in view_descriptions. The evidence is consistent across several agent remarks, so the building should be listed as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical assessment flagged sunset views with High confidence, but in the 20 current listings reviewed 0 mention 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions and none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sunset' or 'western exposure.' Multiple remarks reference city views and views toward Diamond Head, suggesting eastern/mauka exposures; current data may reflect inconsistent agent reporting so the feature is retained with reduced (implied) confidence.
No analysis available
There are many view references (city, mountain, Diamond Head) but no explicit statement about viewing fireworks from units or building. Absence in remarks suggests no confirmed fireworks view.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence the building has an on-site resident manager: 19/20 MLS listings have RESMAN checked and multiple public remarks state phrases like 'resident manager onsite', 'on-site resident manager', and 'resident manager on site'. Mentions appear across many different listings/agents rather than isolated to a single ad, indicating the feature is genuine.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.