Kapiolani Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Terrace
Building Overview
Kapiolani Terrace in Ala Moana-Kakaako (1973) — concrete building with pool and resident manager. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Kapiolani Terrace
Kapiolani Terrace is located in the Ala Moana–Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1973. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count information are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key features documented in MLS include an on-site pool and a resident manager. Units use window air conditioning. No additional common-area amenities are listed in the provided data.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The MLS indicates pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details independently with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or similar wording, but found none. The remarks provide no usable evidence to estimate the owner-occupied share.
I looked for an explicit count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but the remarks do not provide one. The listings mention elevator access and updated elevators, which confirms the presence of elevators but not how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 20 recent MLS listings have OTCOEX checked. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'common area electricity included' and several listings note 'Electricity is sub-metered,' suggesting agents may be inconsistent, but the MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings implies the building commonly lists common-area electric as included.
No analysis available
Evidence points strongly to electricity not being included: multiple listings explicitly say "Electricity is sub-metered." Only 3 of 20 recent MLS listings checked ELECTR, which is weak support and conflicts with the remarks. This looks more like inconsistent agent data than a building-wide fee inclusion.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included at the building level. Recent MLS data is strong at 17 of 20 listings checked HOTWAT, and there are no WTRHTR indicators in the listings. Public remarks do not contradict this, so the pattern is consistent with a shared building expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported. MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with SEWER checked, and at least one remark explicitly states "water, and sewer included." The repeated pattern across listings suggests this is a building-level expense rather than an agent-specific entry.
Water inclusion is very well supported. MLS data shows 19 of 20 recent listings checked WATER, and public remarks also explicitly mention "water ... included." The consistency across listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 listings explicitly mention a shared deck amenity, using phrases like “swimming pool deck” and “pool and large recreational deck on the fourth floor,” indicating a common recreation/pool deck area for residents. Combined with 7/20 MLS entries checking PATDEC/COVPAT, this provides strong, multi-agent evidence that the building offers a deck-style outdoor amenity accessible to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several remarks reference a shared recreation area, e.g. 'The pool and large recreation deck are located on the 4th floor' and 'a pool and large recreational deck on the fourth floor overlooking Diamond Head Crater.' At least 4 separate listings describe this amenity deck plus the MLS data (11/20 with RECARE) aligns, indicating a common recreation area for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention building storage — e.g., "bike/surfboard storage," "surfboard and Bike storage," and "storage cage on the first floor," and one unit notes an "extra movable storage unit within the unit." These references appear in several (≈7) of the provided public remarks and align with the MLS amenities checkbox (2/20) and a unit feature (1/20), indicating the building offers storage/lockers.
Surfboard storage is clearly and repeatedly documented in the listings, often paired with bike storage. This is strong evidence that the building provides surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows 19/20 listings with TRACHU checked, and many current remarks explicitly mention it across multiple listings and agents. The repeated phrasing "trash chute on each floor" / "trash chute on every floor" suggests this is a shared building amenity, not a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool. Multiple listings explicitly mention it across many agents/remarks, including phrases like "resident pool," "sparkling pool," and "pool and large recreational deck"—well beyond copy-paste noise. Historical MLS checkbox data is also consistent at 20/20, so this feature is highly reliable.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater-pool language including salt water pool, saltwater pool, saline pool, or salt pool. The building has a pool, but the remarks do not specify that it is salt water.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports shared/community laundry in the building. At least 10+ current remarks explicitly mention laundry on each floor or coin/community laundry, which aligns with the historical MLS COMLAU checkbox appearing in 17 of 20 listings. This looks like consistent building-level amenities rather than copy-paste error.
Several listings describe the laundry as coin-operated, which clearly indicates a paid laundry setup. I looked for coin-op, coin laundry, quarters, and similar payment language, and found direct matches.
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly state that laundry facilities are available on each floor. This is strong, consistent evidence across several listings, so the feature is confirmed with high confidence.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly supported across many listings, with repeated phrases like "one assigned covered parking stall," "1 assigned parking stall," and "assigned, secured and covered parking." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off remark, matching the high-confidence MLS pattern.
Covered parking is confirmed in many remarks, including "one assigned covered parking stall," "full-size covered parking stall," "1 covered parking stall," and "parking garage is secured and stall is covered." The evidence is broad and repetitive across listings, so this feature is highly reliable.
I searched for deeded, owned, or parking-in-deed language and did not find any. The repeated wording indicates assigned covered stalls in a secured garage, which is different from deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate parking charge, monthly parking rent, or added parking cost and found none. The remarks consistently describe parking as assigned or included, but do not state a fee.
No analysis available
Secured-entry parking/building access is supported by multiple explicit remarks such as "secured entry," "gated parking structure," "keyed entry building with a gated parking entrance," and "fob required entry." While not every listing mentions it, the pattern is consistent enough to confirm this feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for waitlist-related wording such as "parking waitlist" or "join the waitlist" and found nothing. The building is repeatedly described as having assigned covered parking, which suggests no waitlist issue is being raised in the remarks.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe card/fob/keyed access features for the building and elevator. This is strong public-remarks evidence for electronic access security.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit patrol-related terms such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The remarks mention secured entry, cameras, and resident management, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that Kapiolani Terrace units have window-type air conditioning. Multiple listings explicitly say 'window A/C' or 'Window-Type AC Unit,' and others mention a 'new AC unit' or 'recent exterior a/c sleeve,' which is consistent with window/wall AC installations. The MLS history is highly consistent as well, with ACWIUN checked in 19 of 20 listings, suggesting this is a building-wide copy-paste pattern that is nonetheless corroborated by remarks.
There is extremely strong building-level evidence for concrete construction: 20 of 20 current MLS listings list CONCRE. The public remarks do not explicitly say "concrete," but they repeatedly describe a substantial, well-managed condo tower with features like secured garage, elevators, and building-wide systems, which is consistent with the MLS data. This appears to be stable, not copy-paste noise, because every current listing shows the same construction material.
No analysis available
Hollow tile is not supported by the public remarks, and the current MLS pattern is weak and inconsistent at only 6 of 20 listings. In contrast, every current listing reports CONCRE, which strongly suggests the hollow tile checkboxes are copy-paste or data-entry noise rather than a real building feature. Based on the available evidence, this should be treated as not a valid building construction material for the property.
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. With absent historical confirmation and no remarks corroborating it, the evidence for masonry/stucco is weak and likely due to inconsistent MLS checkbox use.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings indicate SLAB and none of the public remarks reference 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' Without prior confirmation or remarks describing a slab foundation, the evidence is weak and likely due to MLS checkbox inconsistencies.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 MLS listings show construction_materials=ABOGRO and there are no remarks stating 'above ground' construction or describing a recent change. With no supporting remarks and low/absent historical confidence, the ABOGRO tag appears to be an inconsistent agent entry and is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR permission terms such as NUC, TVU, vacation rental allowed, or legal short-term rental and found none. References to "vacation getaway" and "investment opportunity" are not enough to confirm STR is allowed, so this is treated as not evidenced/likely not allowed from the remarks.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or participation in a rental pool and found nothing. Because the remarks do not establish that short-term rentals are allowed, hotel pool participation must be false.
I looked for phrases indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or mandatory rental-program membership and found none. With no evidence of a hotel rental pool and no STR confirmation, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as a lease expiration year, ground lease end date, or renewal/extension wording and found nothing. The remarks do not provide any 4-digit lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings discuss parking, security, pool, and renovations, but do not mention VA loan eligibility.
The listings repeatedly use direct wording that matches full/walls-in coverage, including "100% hurricane insurance coverage" and "fully insured." This is strong evidence that the HOA provides comprehensive building insurance.
No analysis available
This is directly and repeatedly confirmed in the public remarks. The language is specific and consistent, so confidence is very high that the building passed the fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are consistently supported across multiple listings and agents. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly mention them with phrases like "city and mountain views," "beautiful mountain views," and "mauka (mountain) side." The pattern appears repeatedly enough to treat mountain views as an available building feature.
No analysis available
City views are strongly and consistently documented across the listing remarks. Multiple listings mention "city views" or "panoramic city & mountain views," and the historical MLS data shows city views in 14 of 20 listings. This is strong evidence that the building offers city-view units and the remarks are not just isolated copy-paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical assessment flagged sunset views with High confidence, but in the 20 current listings reviewed 0 mention 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions and none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sunset' or 'western exposure.' Multiple remarks reference city views and views toward Diamond Head, suggesting eastern/mauka exposures; current data may reflect inconsistent agent reporting so the feature is retained with reduced (implied) confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to fireworks views, watching fireworks from lanais, or seeing fireworks from the building. The remarks mention city, mountain, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about fireworks views from units.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported across the listing history and current remarks. Multiple agents explicitly describe the building as having an "on-site resident manager" or "resident manager onsite," and the MLS amenity flag historically appeared in 19/20 listings. This looks like consistent building-level copy rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.