Kapiolani Belaire
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Belaire
Building Overview
Kapiolani Belaire in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1969) with pool and mountain views.
About Kapiolani Belaire
Kapiolani Belaire is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1969. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and has two elevators. MLS data did not provide unit count or floorplate size.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. Mountain views are listed for the property. No short-term rental use is allowed and pets are not permitted per the available MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is recorded as Unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS-derived information; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy figures or clear descriptors (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') and found none. Several ads address both investors and owner-occupants as potential buyers, but that language does not indicate the current percentage of owner-occupied units, so owner_occupancy remains unknown.
Multiple listings explicitly reference 'two elevators' (e.g., 'two elevators' in the remarks). This directly confirms the current elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings include OTCOEX (common-area electric) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar phrases, so evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and may reflect copy/paste by agents rather than explicit mention in remarks.
No analysis available
Just 2 of 20 recent MLS listings list ELECTR in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks state 'electricity included' or 'power included in fees.' Given the low/absent historical confidence and lack of remarks, the feature is omitted (false) with high confidence.
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate HOTWAT included in association fees, while 3 listings list WTRHTR (in‑unit water heater), suggesting mixed unit situations. Public remarks do not clarify hot-water inclusion, so the evidence is moderately strong from MLS checkboxes but inconsistent across some listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 recent MLS listings list SEWER as included in association fees; remarks across multiple listings do not contradict this and there is a consistent pattern across agents, supporting strong confidence that sewer is included.
All 20 of 20 recent MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not dispute this and historical listings show consistent, building-wide inclusion of water in the HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building provides storage lockers: roughly 11 listings' public remarks explicitly mention storage (phrases include "assigned storage locker for the unit", "small storage locker on the parking level", "storage locker usage", and "storage on the ground floor"). MLS amenity checkboxes also frequently list storage (15/20), and statements appear across multiple agent listings rather than a single outlier, supporting high confidence that storage units/lockers are offered.
I searched for phrases indicating surfboard/board storage but found only general references to assigned or small storage lockers. There is no explicit mention of dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
12 of 20 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, but zero public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. The MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings suggests the building likely has a trash chute, however the lack of any agent remarks describing it indicates the evidence is moderate and may reflect checkbox copy‑paste rather than consistent agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence the building has a shared pool: multiple current public remarks state the building offers a pool (quotes include "private pool", "has a swimming pool", and "sparkling pool"). Historical MLS data also had the pool amenity checked on all current listings (previously high confidence), and the pool is referenced by different agents across listings, indicating the amenity is real and building-wide.
No analysis available
Although the building amenities repeatedly mention a pool, the public remarks do not specify that the pool is saltwater. I searched for 'salt water', 'saltwater', and similar terms and found no references.
Strong evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry: all recent MLS data (20 of 20 listings) reference washer/dryer in the unit with phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer," "new Bosch washer/dryer," and "LG front-load washer & dryer." Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and listings, indicating the feature is widespread rather than an isolated or copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', and 'quarters' and found no references. The remarks emphasize in-unit washers/dryers and do not indicate paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' but found none. Remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe community laundry facilities on every floor.
Strong evidence across the listing corpus: 20/20 current MLS listings show parking checkbox types (OPEN/COVERED/GARAGE/ASSIGNED/etc.), and numerous remarks state assigned parking stalls, "assigned covered parking stall," "assigned parking space in a secure, gated lot/garage," and "parking for TWO cars in tandem." Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating building-level parking is available.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: MLS data lists ASSIGN in 15 of 20 listings and many remarks explicitly state "assigned" (examples: "1 assigned covered parking space in gated parking garage", "assigned covered parking stall"). Multiple different listings/agents reference assigned stalls, suggesting this is a building-level offering rather than isolated copy/paste error.
Evidence is strong that covered parking is available: 14 of 20 MLS entries flag covered/garage parking and multiple public remarks state "covered" or "gated parking garage" (e.g., "assigned covered parking stall", "1 assigned covered parking space in gated parking garage"). The coverage across listings and agents supports inclusion.
Many listings note '1 assigned covered parking space' or 'assigned parking stall', e.g. '1 assigned covered parking space in a gated parking garage' and 'assigned covered parking stall'. However, there is no explicit language indicating the parking is deeded/owned with the unit, so deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rent' and found none. The remarks describe assigned parking included with units, so no separate parking fee is mentioned.
Weak/isolated MLS signal: only 1 of 20 listings has GUEST in parking_features, and across 20 public remarks there are no phrases like "guest parking" or "visitor parking." The lack of corroborating remarks across multiple agents suggests guest parking is not a building-level feature.
There is strong evidence the parking has secured entry: 11 of 20 MLS entries list SECENT and many remarks reference secured or gated parking and security monitoring (examples: "secure, gated lot with security monitoring", "gated parking garage", "secured lobby / parking area"). Multiple agents mention gated/secured access, supporting this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed listings for phrases such as 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. Remarks describe assigned parking but do not reference any waiting-list system.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit terms like 'key card access', 'fob access', or 'card reader' and found none. While the building has secured entry and on-site security, there is no mention of a card/fob electronic access system in the remarks.
Multiple recent listings explicitly mention building security: phrases include "on-site security," "gated parking garage with security guard monitor," "security guard and secured lobby / parking area," and "secure, gated lot with security monitoring." At least several (many) different agent remarks reference secured entry or security monitoring, matching historical MLS checkbox data and indicating strong, consistent evidence that the building provides security guard/monitoring service.
I searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', and similar terms; while exact phrasing varies, several listings explicitly reference security guard presence and security monitoring. This constitutes strong evidence of a security/patrol service or on-site guards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building is concrete: 18 of 20 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' in construction materials and at least one public remark explicitly notes 'solid cement walls for privacy and comfort.' Multiple agents consistently mark concrete construction across listings, indicating a building-level concrete structure.
Evidence for double-wall construction is weak: only 6 of 20 MLS listings currently check DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks (0 of the provided listings) reference 'double wall' or similar phrasing. This pattern suggests the DOUWAL flag may be an inconsistent/agent-entered checkbox rather than a widely-documented feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', '30-day minimum', and related phrases and found none. In absence of explicit STR-permission language, STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is set to false with medium confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or branded hotel management and found no references. Because STRs are not indicated, hotel-pool participation is set to false with high confidence.
Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar phrases and found none. Given the absence of STR/rental-pool language, mandatory participation is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed remarks for explicit lease/leasehold language and 4-digit years (e.g., 'lease expires 20xx', 'land lease to 2065'). No references to a lease expiry year or leasehold status were found.
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no explicit mention in any listing, VA approval cannot be confirmed.
At least one remark explicitly cites 'full hurricane insurance,' indicating the association carries comprehensive/walls-in style coverage. This supports a high-confidence true for fully insured.
At least 5–6 separate public remarks in the current dataset explicitly mention building fire sprinklers (phrases include 'recent addition of a fire sprinkler system', 'Note this building has fire sprinklers for your protection', and 'installation of a modern sprinkler system'), matching prior high-confidence MLS history. Multiple agents reference the system across different listings, indicating a building-wide feature rather than a single-unit note.
I searched all public remarks for explicit phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', or 'life safety compliant' and found none. Several listings note installation or existence of a sprinkler system, which is a safety upgrade, but there is no direct mention that a formal FLSE has been passed. Because there is no explicit FLSE pass language in the remarks, I cannot mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are consistently advertised: 6 of 20 current MLS listings list mountain-related views and multiple unit remarks explicitly say phrases like 'green mountain views' and 'breathtaking views of majestic mountains.' Evidence is strong across several different listings and agents, indicating the building offers mountain views.
Diamond Head is not mentioned in the public remarks despite 2 of 20 MLS view_descriptions marking it; there are no quotes or multiple-agent confirmations referencing 'Diamond Head' or 'DH view.' Given the lack of corroborating remarks, Diamond Head view is omitted for the building.
City views are well-supported: 9 of 20 current MLS listings include city in view_descriptions and numerous remarks state 'city skyline,' 'twinkle city lights,' or 'city view,' consistently across listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise/eastern exposure is suggested by 2 of 20 MLS listings and an explicit remark describing an 'east-facing position' that captures morning breezes and avoids afternoon sun. Evidence is moderate and implies some units/building orientations provide sunrise views.
Only 1 of 20 current listings has SUNSET in the MLS view field, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset or western/exposure phrases (remarks mention 'mountain', 'city lights', 'peek of the ocean', 'evening twinkling city lights' or 'east-facing' but not 'sunset' or 'western'). Given the absence of explicit sunset references across multiple agent remarks and the very small MLS checkbox count, the evidence suggests the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements about viewing fireworks from the unit or building and found none. The remarks describe mountain, city, and occasional ocean views but do not mention fireworks-viewing from the building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has an on-site resident manager: historical MLS data had RESMAN checked in 17 of 20 listings, and at least 6 current public remarks explicitly state a resident or on-site manager (quotes include "resident manager on site" and "long-standing resident manager"). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings rather than a single isolated post, supporting a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.