Kapiolani Belaire
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Belaire
Building Overview
Kapiolani Belaire in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1969) with pool and mountain views.
About Kapiolani Belaire
Kapiolani Belaire is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1969. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and has two elevators. MLS data did not provide unit count or floorplate size.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. Mountain views are listed for the property. No short-term rental use is allowed and pets are not permitted per the available MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is recorded as Unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS-derived information; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric ownership rates such as "80% owner occupied" as well as qualitative phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only say the building is suitable for owner-occupants or investors, which does not indicate actual owner-occupancy level.
Public remarks directly confirm the building has two elevators. This matches the current building context and requires no inference.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, which supports common-area electricity being part of the maintenance fee. None of the public remarks explicitly confirm or dispute it, so this appears to rely mainly on MLS checkbox data rather than narrative remarks.
No analysis available
Just 2 of 20 recent MLS listings list ELECTR in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks state 'electricity included' or 'power included in fees.' Given the low/absent historical confidence and lack of remarks, the feature is omitted (false) with high confidence.
No analysis available
16 of 20 recent listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, while only 2 list WTRHTR, which is not enough to overturn the stronger pattern. Public remarks across the listings do not explicitly mention hot water either way, so this remains a moderate-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 recent MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, making this one of the most consistent building-level fee inclusions. The public remarks do not raise any contradiction, so sewer inclusion appears to be a stable feature.
All 20 of 20 recent MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks are silent on the matter but do not contradict it, so water should be treated as definitively included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building provides storage lockers: roughly 11 listings' public remarks explicitly mention storage (phrases include "assigned storage locker for the unit", "small storage locker on the parking level", "storage locker usage", and "storage on the ground floor"). MLS amenity checkboxes also frequently list storage (15/20), and statements appear across multiple agent listings rather than a single outlier, supporting high confidence that storage units/lockers are offered.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and similar terms, but found no explicit references. The remarks only mention general storage lockers and assigned storage, which do not confirm surfboard storage.
No analysis available
12 of 20 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, suggesting the building likely has a trash chute system. However, zero public remarks mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute, so the evidence is not reinforced by agent descriptions. This looks like MLS checkbox data rather than independently verified marketing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has strong, consistent evidence of a shared swimming pool. Multiple current remarks mention it directly, including phrases like "refreshing swimming pool," "has a swimming pool," "A swimming pool for your enjoyment is on the ground floor," and "pool" in building amenities. The evidence is repeated across many listings and appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for saltwater pool wording such as salt water, salt pool, saline pool, or saltwater pool and found none. The building clearly has a pool, but its water type is not specified in the public remarks.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings shows this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple remarks explicitly say "in-unit washer and dryer" or name specific appliances like LG/Bosch front-load units, and the historical MLS data is unanimous (20/20 listings include WASHER/DRYER). This looks like a real building-level feature, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit paid-laundry wording such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, or card-operated machines and found no such mention. The public remarks instead emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of a paid community laundry facility.
I searched the remarks for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor laundry references, but found none. The listings consistently describe in-unit washer/dryer, which points away from a shared laundry setup being a highlighted amenity.
Strong evidence across the listing corpus: 20/20 current MLS listings show parking checkbox types (OPEN/COVERED/GARAGE/ASSIGNED/etc.), and numerous remarks state assigned parking stalls, "assigned covered parking stall," "assigned parking space in a secure, gated lot/garage," and "parking for TWO cars in tandem." Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating building-level parking is available.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across many listings, with multiple remarks explicitly saying "assigned parking space," "1 assigned parking," and "assigned covered parking stall." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not limited to a single listing, so this feature should be treated as available in the building.
Covered parking is well supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Multiple listings mention a "gated garage," "assigned covered parking space," "one covered parking stall," and "parking area" that is secured, indicating the building offers covered parking options.
I found multiple references to assigned and covered parking, but none that state the stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Because deeded parking must be explicitly supported by remarks, I cannot mark this true.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a separate parking cost, monthly fee, or parking rental charge and found none. The remarks describe parking as assigned or included, but do not provide a fee amount.
Weak/isolated MLS signal: only 1 of 20 listings has GUEST in parking_features, and across 20 public remarks there are no phrases like "guest parking" or "visitor parking." The lack of corroborating remarks across multiple agents suggests guest parking is not a building-level feature.
There is strong evidence the parking has secured entry: 11 of 20 MLS entries list SECENT and many remarks reference secured or gated parking and security monitoring (examples: "secure, gated lot with security monitoring", "gated parking garage", "secured lobby / parking area"). Multiple agents mention gated/secured access, supporting this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language such as parking waitlist, join the waitlist, or waiting list for parking and found nothing. The listings instead describe available assigned parking, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit card/fob access language like key card access, fob entry, card reader, or keycard entry and found none. The remarks do describe secured entry and enterphone access, but that is not the same as a card-based security system.
Multiple recent listings explicitly mention building security: phrases include "on-site security," "gated parking garage with security guard monitor," "security guard and secured lobby / parking area," and "secure, gated lot with security monitoring." At least several (many) different agent remarks reference secured entry or security monitoring, matching historical MLS checkbox data and indicating strong, consistent evidence that the building provides security guard/monitoring service.
There are multiple public remarks indicating active security presence, including security guard and security monitoring references. While the exact phrase "security patrol" is not used, the repeated mentions of security guard coverage support a positive reading for patrol/service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is very likely concrete. Current MLS data shows CONCRE in 18 of 20 listings, and multiple public remarks describe the property with concrete/cement construction language, including "solid cement walls" for privacy and comfort. The evidence is consistent across listings and appears to be building-level rather than unit-specific copy-paste noise.
Evidence for double-wall construction is weak: only 6 of 20 MLS listings currently check DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks (0 of the provided listings) reference 'double wall' or similar phrasing. This pattern suggests the DOUWAL flag may be an inconsistent/agent-entered checkbox rather than a widely-documented feature.
No analysis available
There is no supporting language in the remarks for masonry and stucco construction, while the building is repeatedly described with concrete/cement walls. With only 6 of 20 current listings checked and no corroborating mention from agents, the MASSTU data appears weak and likely incorrect for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators and found none in the remarks. Since STR permission must be based on public remarks here, the safest conclusion is that STR allowance is not evidenced.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded pool programs and found none. Also, because STR is not evidenced as allowed, this feature must remain false.
I searched for wording that would make rental-pool participation mandatory and found nothing. There is also no evidence that any STR or hotel-pool program exists, so this remains false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, or renewed through a specific year, but found nothing. Without an explicit 4-digit lease expiry year in the remarks, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA-loan approval language and found none. Since this feature is only determined from public remarks, there is no evidence to mark the building as VA approved.
The remarks contain direct evidence that the association carries full hurricane insurance, which supports the building being fully insured. This is strong, explicit coverage language rather than an inference.
At least 5–6 separate public remarks in the current dataset explicitly mention building fire sprinklers (phrases include 'recent addition of a fire sprinkler system', 'Note this building has fire sprinklers for your protection', and 'installation of a modern sprinkler system'), matching prior high-confidence MLS history. Multiple agents reference the system across different listings, indicating a building-wide feature rather than a single-unit note.
I searched for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection approval, or explicit life-safety compliance. The remarks mention a recent fire sprinkler system, which is a safety upgrade, but that is not the same as a confirmed FLSE pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are consistently advertised: 6 of 20 current MLS listings list mountain-related views and multiple unit remarks explicitly say phrases like 'green mountain views' and 'breathtaking views of majestic mountains.' Evidence is strong across several different listings and agents, indicating the building offers mountain views.
Diamond Head is not mentioned in the public remarks despite 2 of 20 MLS view_descriptions marking it; there are no quotes or multiple-agent confirmations referencing 'Diamond Head' or 'DH view.' Given the lack of corroborating remarks, Diamond Head view is omitted for the building.
City views are well-supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention "city skyline," "city lights," "city view," and "views to the mountains & city." Current MLS data also shows CITY in 18 of 20 listings, which strongly confirms this feature across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise/eastern exposure is suggested by 2 of 20 MLS listings and an explicit remark describing an 'east-facing position' that captures morning breezes and avoids afternoon sun. Evidence is moderate and implies some units/building orientations provide sunrise views.
Only 1 of 20 current listings has SUNSET in the MLS view field, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset or western/exposure phrases (remarks mention 'mountain', 'city lights', 'peek of the ocean', 'evening twinkling city lights' or 'east-facing' but not 'sunset' or 'western'). Given the absence of explicit sunset references across multiple agent remarks and the very small MLS checkbox count, the evidence suggests the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for statements about fireworks views from the building, lanai, or unit, but found nothing. The remarks mention mountain, city, ocean peek, and general views, not fireworks viewing.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Kapiolani Belaire/Kapiolani Bel-Aire has an on-site resident manager. The feature is explicitly mentioned in several current listings, including phrases like "resident manager on site," "on-site Resident Manager," and "long-standing resident manager," which aligns with the historical RESMAN data (17/20 listings). This appears to be a genuine building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.