Kapiolani Belaire
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Belaire
Building Overview
Kapiolani Belaire in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1969) with pool and mountain views.
About Kapiolani Belaire
Kapiolani Belaire is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1969. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and has two elevators. MLS data did not provide unit count or floorplate size.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. Mountain views are listed for the property. No short-term rental use is allowed and pets are not permitted per the available MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is recorded as Unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS-derived information; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe units as suitable for 'owner-occupants or investors,' but this does not indicate the percentage of owner-occupied units. Searches for explicit percentages and terms such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied' found no qualifying evidence.
The remarks directly confirm two elevators, matching the current building context. No contrary statements were found.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
OTCOEX appears in the association fee inclusions for 16 of 20 recent listings. No public remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity, so the evidence is primarily MLS-based, but the pattern across many listings supports that it is generally included.
No analysis available
Just 2 of 20 recent MLS listings list ELECTR in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks state 'electricity included' or 'power included in fees.' Given the low/absent historical confidence and lack of remarks, the feature is omitted (false) with high confidence.
No analysis available
Seventeen of 20 current listings identify HOTWAT as included in the association fee, compared with only two listings mentioning WTRHTR. The remarks do not independently confirm hot water inclusion, suggesting the checkbox data may be partly copied forward, but the strong multi-listing pattern supports that hot water is generally included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed as included in 19 of 20 recent listings. Although none of the provided remarks explicitly mention sewer inclusion, the near-universal MLS consistency and previously high confidence make this strong building-level evidence.
Water is listed in the association fee inclusions for all 20 recent listings. No remarks explicitly state that water fees are included, but unanimous data across the listings provides definitive support for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many listings for Kapiolani Belaire/Kapiolani Bel-Aire. Roughly 10+ remarks explicitly mention a storage locker or additional storage space, including details like a locker that can fit luggage or an assigned locker for the unit. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
The remarks refer to assigned storage lockers and general storage spaces. None identify storage intended for surfboards or boards.
No analysis available
The trash chute amenity appears in 12 of 20 current listings, but 0 listings explicitly mention a “trash chute,” “garbage chute,” or “refuse chute” in their remarks. This provides moderate, building-level evidence, though the absence of supporting remarks means the feature is not strongly independently confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly confirmed across multiple independent remarks, with at least 14 listings explicitly mentioning a pool or swimming pool. Key phrases include 'residents can relax and cool off in the on-property swimming pool,' 'building amenities include a refreshing pool,' and 'a swimming pool for your enjoyment is on the ground floor.' This is consistent with the previously high-confidence evidence and is not merely unsupported checkbox data.
No analysis available
The building pool is repeatedly referenced. Its water type is not described as saltwater.
At least 12 of the provided remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, using phrases such as 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer and dryer in unit,' and 'front-loading washer and dryer.' This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings and is fully consistent with the current MLS data showing washer/dryer inclusions in all 20 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe in-unit washers and dryers rather than shared laundry. No paid community laundry arrangement is identified.
The remarks consistently mention in-unit washers and dryers. They do not describe community laundry facilities being available on every floor.
Strong evidence across the listing corpus: 20/20 current MLS listings show parking checkbox types (OPEN/COVERED/GARAGE/ASSIGNED/etc.), and numerous remarks state assigned parking stalls, "assigned covered parking stall," "assigned parking space in a secure, gated lot/garage," and "parking for TWO cars in tandem." Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating building-level parking is available.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. Remarks explicitly cite dedicated or assigned stalls, including stall numbers and descriptions such as "assigned parking stall (A-18)" and "1 assigned covered parking space," consistent with the current MLS data.
Covered parking is very strongly evidenced across the building. Multiple listings reference covered stalls or garage parking, including "assigned covered parking stall," "gated parking garage," and parking that is "covered, secure," demonstrating support beyond checkbox data.
Multiple listings mention an assigned, covered, secure, or gated parking stall, including "assigned parking stall" and "1 assigned covered parking space." None explicitly says the parking is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for monthly parking fees, parking charges, rental costs, and additional parking costs. No parking fee or monthly parking charge was stated.
Weak/isolated MLS signal: only 1 of 20 listings has GUEST in parking_features, and across 20 public remarks there are no phrases like "guest parking" or "visitor parking." The lack of corroborating remarks across multiple agents suggests guest parking is not a building-level feature.
Secured parking entry is strongly supported by repeated remarks from multiple listings. Key phrases include "secured gate," "secure, gated lot with security monitoring," "gated parking garage," and "secured lobby / parking area," confirming that parking access is gated or monitored.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned and covered parking but do not mention a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for a stall. No evidence of a building parking waitlist was found.
No analysis available
The building has several security-related features, including gated entry and a secured lobby. No card- or fob-based access system is explicitly identified.
Multiple recent listings explicitly mention building security: phrases include "on-site security," "gated parking garage with security guard monitor," "security guard and secured lobby / parking area," and "secure, gated lot with security monitoring." At least several (many) different agent remarks reference secured entry or security monitoring, matching historical MLS checkbox data and indicating strong, consistent evidence that the building provides security guard/monitoring service.
Listings mention a security guard, security monitoring, secured entry, and a resident manager. These remarks do not specifically establish a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported: 19 of 20 current listings report CONCRE in the construction materials, consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment. One listing explicitly mentions "solid cement walls," while the broad MLS agreement across many listings indicates this is a building-level feature rather than an isolated copy-paste error.
Evidence for double-wall construction is weak: only 6 of 20 MLS listings currently check DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks (0 of the provided listings) reference 'double wall' or similar phrasing. This pattern suggests the DOUWAL flag may be an inconsistent/agent-entered checkbox rather than a widely-documented feature.
No analysis available
There is no supporting language in the remarks for masonry and stucco construction. The listings repeatedly describe the building in concrete/cement terms, while MASSTU appears in only 7 of 20 MLS entries, suggesting copy-paste or unverified data rather than a true building characteristic.
No analysis available
Construction on a concrete slab is not supported by the public remarks. The feature appears in only 2 of 20 MLS records and is never described in the listing remarks, so it looks unverified and likely absent from the building description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, STR, NUC, TVU, and legal rental language. Although some listings refer to owner-occupants and investors, none explicitly permits short-term rentals, so STR allowance is not supported.
The remarks were searched for hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel-managed, Hilton, Trump, Ritz, and similar terms. No such language was found, and the prerequisite of confirmed STR allowance is not met.
The remarks were searched for mandatory rental-pool terms such as required participation, must rent, cannot opt out, or required hotel operations. None was found, and mandatory participation cannot be true without confirmed STR allowance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease renewal, and related terms with a specific four-digit year. No applicable lease-expiry or extension year was found.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA approval or financing language, including "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None was found, so VA approval is not supported by the available public remarks.
The phrase 'full hurricane insurance' is strong evidence of comprehensive building insurance by the association. No remarks contradict fully insured status.
At least 5–6 separate public remarks in the current dataset explicitly mention building fire sprinklers (phrases include 'recent addition of a fire sprinkler system', 'Note this building has fire sprinklers for your protection', and 'installation of a modern sprinkler system'), matching prior high-confidence MLS history. Multiple agents reference the system across different listings, indicating a building-wide feature rather than a single-unit note.
The remarks mention fire sprinklers and a backup generator, but these do not establish that a fire/life safety evaluation was passed. Searches for FLSE approval, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection found no explicit confirmation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are consistently advertised: 6 of 20 current MLS listings list mountain-related views and multiple unit remarks explicitly say phrases like 'green mountain views' and 'breathtaking views of majestic mountains.' Evidence is strong across several different listings and agents, indicating the building offers mountain views.
Diamond Head is not mentioned in the public remarks despite 2 of 20 MLS view_descriptions marking it; there are no quotes or multiple-agent confirmations referencing 'Diamond Head' or 'DH view.' Given the lack of corroborating remarks, Diamond Head view is omitted for the building.
City views are strongly supported across the building: 18 of 20 listings identify CITY in the view descriptions. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention the city skyline, city lights, or city views, including "city skyline," "twinkle city lights at night," and "views to the mountains & city," so the evidence is not merely an MLS checkbox pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise/eastern exposure is suggested in at least one clear remark describing an "east-facing position" that captures morning trade winds and avoids afternoon sun. The evidence is weaker than for city views because most listings do not mention sunrise specifically, but the directional language supports the feature at a building/unit level.
Only 1 of 20 current listings has SUNSET in the MLS view field, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset or western/exposure phrases (remarks mention 'mountain', 'city lights', 'peek of the ocean', 'evening twinkling city lights' or 'east-facing' but not 'sunset' or 'western'). Given the absence of explicit sunset references across multiple agent remarks and the very small MLS checkbox count, the evidence suggests the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
The remarks mention mountain, city, skyline, and limited ocean views. They do not state that units or the building have a fireworks view.
No analysis available
The building has a resident manager, supported by the historical 17/20 RESMAN amenity count and several current remarks. Explicit references include 'Resident manager on site,' 'an on-site Resident Manager,' 'long-standing resident manager,' and managers serving the property for 50+ years, indicating strong multi-listing confirmation rather than a single checkbox entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.