Kapili at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapili at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kapili at Hoopili in Ewa — 2025 building with steel/wood frame construction and on-site pool; split air conditioning.
About Kapili at Hoopili
Kapili at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2025. According to available records, the building is constructed with a combination of steel frame and wood frame. Unit count and individual unit sizes are not provided in the MLS-derived data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and units feature split air conditioning. No additional amenities or interior feature details are listed in the provided records.
Parking is listed as available and covered. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. These statements are based on MLS-sourced information; buyers should verify all details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that maintenance fees include hot water. Across the reviewed listings, 0/20 mention HOTWAT, while 20/20 include WTRHTR, and the remarks consistently focus on in-unit features and appliances instead of building-supplied hot water. This looks like consistent MLS usage rather than a copy-paste indicator of hot water inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is not supported by the remarks, and only 1/20 listings currently checks SEWER. Because the rest of the listings are silent and the descriptions are highly repetitive/copy-paste, this appears to be an unverified MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
Water inclusion is not substantiated by the public remarks, and just 1/20 listings currently shows WATER in the fee inclusions. The repeated listing language suggests copy-paste behavior, so the single checked box is likely not a reliable indicator that water is truly included.
No current listing remarks clearly describe a shared BBQ or grilling amenity for the building. The only references are to unit/private-yard use like “perfect for ... BBQs,” which reads as a private-space suggestion rather than a common facility. Current MLS checkbox evidence is very weak at 1 of 20 listings, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park/pet area is strongly confirmed for this building. Historical MLS data shows DGPRK on 20 of 20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly mention "dog park" alongside other community amenities. This appears to be consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listings explicitly state 'From the living room, step out to the covered balcony' and 'step out to the covered lanai... in your own private yard area,' while many others mention a 'private yard area for you to enjoy the outdoors.' These repeated phrases across numerous units, combined with prior MLS flags (PATDEC/COVPAT), confirm that some homes in the building offer patios, lanais, or decks. Buyers seeking outdoor living space would reasonably consider this building for that feature.
There are no public remarks in the supplied listings that explicitly reference a jogging or walking path. While 3 of 20 current listings show WAJOPA, the lack of corroborating language across the remarks makes this feature unconfirmed and likely inconsistent MLS entry data.
No analysis available
Private yard is strongly supported. Dozens of current remarks mention it in similar language across multiple listings, with explicit phrases such as 'private yard area,' 'your own private yard area,' 'straight through to your private yard,' and 'huge private fenced yard.' The consistency across many listings and models confirms this is a real building/unit feature, not just an unchecked MLS box.
No analysis available
No public remarks in the provided listings explicitly describe a building recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity deck. The lone RECARE checkbox on 1 of 20 current listings looks isolated and is not reinforced by agent descriptions, so confidence that this is a true shared building amenity is low.
Across the building, 4 of 20 current MLS listings include the RECROO recreation-room amenity code. None of the many public remarks explicitly mention a rec or game room, but they consistently omit all common-area details, suggesting the amenity data (rather than remarks) is the primary source; therefore a shared recreation/multi-purpose room likely exists. There is no text indicating that such a facility has been removed or does not exist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage appears in only 1 of 20 current listings, and none of the provided remarks mention a storage locker or extra storage space. Because the only evidence is an MLS checkbox rather than repeated agent descriptions, this is a low-to-moderate confidence feature and may apply only to select units rather than the whole building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building/community. It is explicitly mentioned in the current remarks across multiple listings, including phrases like 'Enjoy Ho‘opili amenities including the pool' and 'Close to parks, pool, playgrounds,' which confirms the amenity rather than a checkbox-only entry. The evidence is consistent and appears across multiple listings/agents, so this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is confirmed extremely strongly. Nearly every listing remark explicitly includes 'washer/dryer' or equivalent language, and the pattern is consistent across many repeated listings/models, suggesting copied but still reliable amenity text. Current MLS data also shows 20/20 listings with washer/dryer in inclusions, reinforcing this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention parking in the remarks, including phrases like 'attached garage,' '2-parking home,' and 'single-car garage and a second open stall,' indicating this is not just checkbox noise. Current MLS data is fully consistent with the remarks.
Assigned parking is supported by the current remarks and prior data. Several listings explicitly say "one assigned stall," while others describe a garage plus a second open/assigned stall, indicating reserved parking is available in at least some units. The evidence is consistent enough to include at the building level.
Covered parking is very strongly supported. The remarks repeatedly call out an 'attached garage' or 'single-car garage,' and several listings also mention a garage paired with an additional open stall, confirming covered parking is available in the building. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears reliable rather than copy-paste error.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed," but found none. The remarks only describe parking configuration (garage, assigned stall, open stall), which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking fee," "monthly parking charge," "parking rental," or any added cost for parking, but found nothing. The remarks describe the number and type of stalls, but they do not mention any separate parking expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar language, but there was no evidence of any waitlist system. The listings instead emphasize included parking options such as garages and assigned stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, the A/C described is consistently split-system only: phrases like 'split AC throughout' and 'Whole house split air conditioning' appear many times. None of the remarks explicitly mention central air conditioning or a building-wide HVAC system, and the current MLS data does not show central AC checked in unit features. This is strong evidence that the building has split AC in units, not central AC.
Split AC is very strongly confirmed for this building. The remarks mention it in many listings—phrases like 'Whole house split air conditioning' and 'split AC throughout' appear repeatedly across multiple floor plans and agents, which looks like consistent copy-paste but still confirms the feature. Historical MLS data also supports it, with 19/20 listings showing ACSPL.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction has weak MLS support at only 7 of 20 listings, and the public remarks across the available listings do not mention double wall, double-wall construction, or similar wording. This looks more like unconfirmed checkbox drift than a verified building feature, so it should not be relied on.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current listings includes MASSTU, and the public remarks do not explicitly mention masonry or stucco construction. This is a weak signal and may reflect agent checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified building feature.
Steel-frame construction is also strongly supported at the building level, with 18 of 20 listings showing STEFRA. The public remarks do not mention construction materials, so this likely reflects repeated MLS data rather than remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 18 of 20 listings coded WOOFRA. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type, so this appears to be a consistent MLS attribute rather than something copy-pasted from remarks.
There are 0 explicit mentions of above-ground construction in the remarks, and the only MLS signal is 1 of 20 listings checked for ABOGRO. That is too sparse to support inclusion, and the surrounding remarks read like repetitive developer copy rather than site-verified construction details. This feature is currently unsupported by the public remarks and should be treated as absent until confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for short-term rental indicators like STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay language, but found none. With no explicit permission shown in the remarks, STR is treated as not allowed based on the available public text.
I searched for hotel rental pool language such as "hotel rental program," "managed by hotel," or branded pool references and found none. Since STR is not supported from the remarks, this must also be false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," "cannot opt out," or similar restrictions and found nothing. With no STR allowance evidenced in the remarks, a mandatory hotel pool is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms like "leasehold," "ground lease," "lease expires," "lease ends," and any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. The listings focus on unit layouts, parking, and completion timing, not land tenure details, so the lease expiry cannot be determined from these remarks.
The remarks directly reference VA financing via an assumable VA loan, which is strong evidence of VA-related financing availability in the public listing remarks. This is the clearest supported feature in the dataset.
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers appear to be a confirmed building feature. Current MLS data shows FIRSPR in 19 out of 20 listings, which is very strong evidence and consistent with prior high-confidence data. The public remarks do not mention sprinklers directly, but the near-universal MLS amenity flag across many listings suggests this is likely a standard building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A small subset of recent listings indicates mountain views: 2 of 20 MLS records list MOUNTA in the view field. No public remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so the evidence comes from MLS field data rather than agent descriptions. This supports that some units in the building offer mountain views, but not consistently across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the current listing set, none of the remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, evening sun, or Friday night fireworks. The MLS view data is also overwhelmingly NONE (18/20), with 0/20 explicitly showing SUNSET. Evidence is strong across many repeated, likely copy-pasted listing remarks, but there is no supporting mention of sunset-oriented views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.