Kapili at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapili at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kapili at Hoopili in Ewa — 2025 building with steel/wood frame construction and on-site pool; split air conditioning.
About Kapili at Hoopili
Kapili at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2025. According to available records, the building is constructed with a combination of steel frame and wood frame. Unit count and individual unit sizes are not provided in the MLS-derived data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and units feature split air conditioning. No additional amenities or interior feature details are listed in the provided records.
Parking is listed as available and covered. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. These statements are based on MLS-sourced information; buyers should verify all details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that maintenance fees include hot water. Across the reviewed listings, 0/20 show HOTWAT while 20/20 include WTRHTR, and the remarks consistently describe in-unit appliances rather than building-provided hot water. This is strong, repeated evidence across many listings and appears consistent rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is not supported by the remarks, and only 1/20 listings currently checks SEWER. Because the rest of the listings are silent and the descriptions are highly repetitive/copy-paste, this appears to be an unverified MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
Water inclusion is not substantiated by the public remarks, and just 1/20 listings currently shows WATER in the fee inclusions. The repeated listing language suggests copy-paste behavior, so the single checked box is likely not a reliable indicator that water is truly included.
No current listing remarks clearly describe a shared BBQ or grilling amenity for the building. The only references are to unit/private-yard use like “perfect for ... BBQs,” which reads as a private-space suggestion rather than a common facility. Current MLS checkbox evidence is very weak at 1 of 20 listings, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park/pet area is strongly confirmed for this building. The MLS data shows DGPRK on 20 of 20 listings, and at least one public remark explicitly says "dog park" as part of the community amenities. The evidence is consistent across listings and appears to be a real shared building/community amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listings explicitly state 'From the living room, step out to the covered balcony' and 'step out to the covered lanai... in your own private yard area,' while many others mention a 'private yard area for you to enjoy the outdoors.' These repeated phrases across numerous units, combined with prior MLS flags (PATDEC/COVPAT), confirm that some homes in the building offer patios, lanais, or decks. Buyers seeking outdoor living space would reasonably consider this building for that feature.
There are no public remarks in the supplied listings that explicitly reference a jogging or walking path. While 3 of 20 current listings show WAJOPA, the lack of corroborating language across the remarks makes this feature unconfirmed and likely inconsistent MLS entry data.
No analysis available
Private yard is strongly supported. Dozens of current remarks mention it in similar language across multiple listings, with explicit phrases such as 'private yard area,' 'your own private yard area,' 'straight through to your private yard,' and 'huge private fenced yard.' The consistency across many listings and models confirms this is a real building/unit feature, not just an unchecked MLS box.
No analysis available
No public remarks in the provided listings explicitly describe a building recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity deck. The lone RECARE checkbox on 1 of 20 current listings looks isolated and is not reinforced by agent descriptions, so confidence that this is a true shared building amenity is low.
Across the building, 4 of 20 current MLS listings include the RECROO recreation-room amenity code. None of the many public remarks explicitly mention a rec or game room, but they consistently omit all common-area details, suggesting the amenity data (rather than remarks) is the primary source; therefore a shared recreation/multi-purpose room likely exists. There is no text indicating that such a facility has been removed or does not exist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage appears in only 1 of 20 current listings, and none of the provided remarks mention a storage locker or extra storage space. Because the only evidence is an MLS checkbox rather than repeated agent descriptions, this is a low-to-moderate confidence feature and may apply only to select units rather than the whole building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building. The current remarks mention it directly in multiple listings, and the MLS data shows pool-related amenity codes on all 20 of 20 listings, which suggests this is a consistent building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly. There is no conflicting evidence indicating the pool was removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is confirmed extremely strongly. Dozens of current listings explicitly say 'washer/dryer' or 'modern appliances including ... washer/dryer,' and this appears across multiple unit types and agents. Combined with the existing MLS data showing 20/20 inclusions, confidence is effectively certain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported throughout the building. Across many listings, remarks explicitly mention parking in multiple forms—"2-parking home," "attached garage," "single-car garage," "second open stall," and "additional parking space." This is consistent across many agents and not just a single copy-paste phrase.
Assigned parking is supported by the current remarks and prior data. Several listings explicitly say "one assigned stall," while others describe a garage plus a second open/assigned stall, indicating reserved parking is available in at least some units. The evidence is consistent enough to include at the building level.
Covered parking is very strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "attached garage," "single-car garage," and garages as part of the unit setup, indicating covered parking is available in the building. The evidence is consistent across many listings and aligns with the MLS data.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in the deed." The listings confirm parking exists, but they never state that the parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or any extra cost for parking. The remarks describe parking arrangements, but no parking fee is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "join the waitlist," or "waiting list for parking." The remarks describe assigned stalls and garages, but do not mention a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, the A/C described is consistently split-system only: phrases like 'split AC throughout' and 'Whole house split air conditioning' appear many times. None of the remarks explicitly mention central air conditioning or a building-wide HVAC system, and the current MLS data does not show central AC checked in unit features. This is strong evidence that the building has split AC in units, not central AC.
Split AC is strongly confirmed for this building. The current public remarks mention it in many listings—phrases like "Whole house split air conditioning" and "split A/C throughout" appear repeatedly across multiple floor plans and agents, including some newer/resale listings. This is consistent with the historical high-confidence MLS data showing ACSPL in 19/20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the remarks provided, 0 listings explicitly say "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls." The current MLS data shows DOUWAL in 7 of 20 listings, but that is not strong enough to outweigh the lack of supporting remarks, especially given the repeated agent-style template language. This feature appears unconfirmed and likely copied into some listings rather than verified building construction.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current listings includes MASSTU, and the public remarks do not explicitly mention masonry or stucco construction. This is a weak signal and may reflect agent checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified building feature.
Steel-frame construction is also strongly supported at the building level by current MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings showing STEFRA. The public remarks do not discuss structural materials, so there is no basis to treat this as an agent error or recent change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is strongly supported at the building level by current MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings showing WOOFRA. The public remarks are repetitive unit descriptions and do not mention construction type, so there is no evidence of a change or correction.
There are 0 explicit mentions of above-ground construction in the remarks, and the only MLS signal is 1 of 20 listings checked for ABOGRO. That is too sparse to support inclusion, and the surrounding remarks read like repetitive developer copy rather than site-verified construction details. This feature is currently unsupported by the public remarks and should be treated as absent until confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "STR permitted," "NUC," "TVU," or vacation-rental language. Nothing in the remarks suggests short-term rentals are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for hotel-rental-pool language such as "hotel pool," "managed by hotel," or branded programs like Hilton/Trump/Ritz. There is no such mention, and without evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out." The remarks do not describe any rental program at all, so there is no evidence that participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," or a specific expiry year, but found nothing. The remarks do not mention land tenure or any lease expiration date.
The listings provide direct evidence of VA-related financing through an assumable VA loan. That is strong public support that VA financing is available/accepted for this building.
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers appear to be a confirmed building feature. Historical MLS data shows FIRSPR on 19 of 20 listings, which is strong evidence of a building-wide system, while the current public remarks simply omit any mention of sprinklers rather than contradicting them. The repeated MLS pattern suggests this is likely consistent across the building and not just a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A small subset of recent listings indicates mountain views: 2 of 20 MLS records list MOUNTA in the view field. No public remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so the evidence comes from MLS field data rather than agent descriptions. This supports that some units in the building offer mountain views, but not consistently across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the current MLS set mention sunset views, and the reviewed public remarks are silent on any sunset/evening-sun/western-exposure language. With 0/20 view descriptions showing SUNSET and 18/20 showing NONE, this appears to be a consistent absence rather than a copy-paste agent pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.