Kapili at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapili at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kapili at Hoopili in Ewa — 2025 building with steel/wood frame construction and on-site pool; split air conditioning.
About Kapili at Hoopili
Kapili at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2025. According to available records, the building is constructed with a combination of steel frame and wood frame. Unit count and individual unit sizes are not provided in the MLS-derived data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and units feature split air conditioning. No additional amenities or interior feature details are listed in the provided records.
Parking is listed as available and covered. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. These statements are based on MLS-sourced information; buyers should verify all details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the reviewed listings, there is no evidence that maintenance fees include hot water. None of the 20 listings mention hot-water inclusion, while all 20 include a water heater (WTRHTR), which strongly suggests hot water is unit-supplied rather than included in the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is not supported by the remarks, and only 1/20 listings currently checks SEWER. Because the rest of the listings are silent and the descriptions are highly repetitive/copy-paste, this appears to be an unverified MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
Water inclusion is not substantiated by the public remarks, and just 1/20 listings currently shows WATER in the fee inclusions. The repeated listing language suggests copy-paste behavior, so the single checked box is likely not a reliable indicator that water is truly included.
No current listing remarks clearly describe a shared BBQ or grilling amenity for the building. The only references are to unit/private-yard use like “perfect for ... BBQs,” which reads as a private-space suggestion rather than a common facility. Current MLS checkbox evidence is very weak at 1 of 20 listings, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park/pet area is strongly confirmed for this building. Historical MLS data shows DGPRK on 20 of 20 listings, and at least one current remark explicitly references a "dog park" as part of the Ho‘opili amenities. The evidence is consistent and appears to be building-level, not a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listings explicitly state 'From the living room, step out to the covered balcony' and 'step out to the covered lanai... in your own private yard area,' while many others mention a 'private yard area for you to enjoy the outdoors.' These repeated phrases across numerous units, combined with prior MLS flags (PATDEC/COVPAT), confirm that some homes in the building offer patios, lanais, or decks. Buyers seeking outdoor living space would reasonably consider this building for that feature.
There are no public remarks in the supplied listings that explicitly reference a jogging or walking path. While 3 of 20 current listings show WAJOPA, the lack of corroborating language across the remarks makes this feature unconfirmed and likely inconsistent MLS entry data.
No analysis available
Private yard is strongly supported. Dozens of current remarks mention it in similar language across multiple listings, with explicit phrases such as 'private yard area,' 'your own private yard area,' 'straight through to your private yard,' and 'huge private fenced yard.' The consistency across many listings and models confirms this is a real building/unit feature, not just an unchecked MLS box.
No analysis available
No public remarks in the provided listings explicitly describe a building recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity deck. The lone RECARE checkbox on 1 of 20 current listings looks isolated and is not reinforced by agent descriptions, so confidence that this is a true shared building amenity is low.
Across the building, 4 of 20 current MLS listings include the RECROO recreation-room amenity code. None of the many public remarks explicitly mention a rec or game room, but they consistently omit all common-area details, suggesting the amenity data (rather than remarks) is the primary source; therefore a shared recreation/multi-purpose room likely exists. There is no text indicating that such a facility has been removed or does not exist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage appears in only 1 of 20 current listings, and none of the provided remarks mention a storage locker or extra storage space. Because the only evidence is an MLS checkbox rather than repeated agent descriptions, this is a low-to-moderate confidence feature and may apply only to select units rather than the whole building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building/community. Multiple remarks explicitly reference the amenity, including phrases like “Enjoy Ho‘opili amenities including the pool” and “Close to parks, pool, playgrounds,” while the MLS amenities are checked in 20/20 listings. The repeated mention across listings appears consistent and not just a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is confirmed extremely strongly. Nearly every remark explicitly includes 'washer/dryer' or similar language, and the pattern is consistent across many listings and unit types, suggesting this is not a copy-paste error but a real building-wide feature available to buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Across many current listings, remarks repeatedly describe parking as an attached garage, a 2-parking home, or a single-car garage plus a second stall/open stall. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and looks like genuine building-level feature data, not a one-off agent note.
Assigned parking is supported by the current remarks and prior data. Several listings explicitly say "one assigned stall," while others describe a garage plus a second open/assigned stall, indicating reserved parking is available in at least some units. The evidence is consistent enough to include at the building level.
Covered parking is very strongly supported. Many current remarks explicitly mention an attached garage or single-car garage, and several listings also describe a garage plus an additional assigned/open stall. This is repeated across many listings and aligns with the existing high-confidence MLS data.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks do confirm parking is assigned/included in the unit descriptions, but that is not the same as deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or any mention of an added parking cost, but found none. The listings describe the number and type of stalls, not a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking list and found no evidence. The remarks instead describe parking as included, assigned, or attached.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, the A/C described is consistently split-system only: phrases like 'split AC throughout' and 'Whole house split air conditioning' appear many times. None of the remarks explicitly mention central air conditioning or a building-wide HVAC system, and the current MLS data does not show central AC checked in unit features. This is strong evidence that the building has split AC in units, not central AC.
Split AC is strongly confirmed for this building. The public remarks mention it in a very large majority of the listings, often using nearly identical phrasing such as 'Whole house split air conditioning' and 'split air conditioning throughout,' which appears to be consistent copy-paste but still confirms the amenity. No contrary evidence suggests the feature was removed, and the current MLS inclusions remain aligned with the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction has weak-to-moderate MLS support but no confirmation in the public remarks. None of the remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing, and the descriptions are heavily repetitive, which makes the checkbox data less reliable. Because the historical confidence is only low/moderate, this feature should be treated cautiously.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current listings includes MASSTU, and the public remarks do not explicitly mention masonry or stucco construction. This is a weak signal and may reflect agent checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified building feature.
Steel-frame construction is strongly supported at the building level. The current MLS data shows STEFRA in 19 of 20 listings, and the public remarks do not provide any conflicting construction details. The repeated listing text suggests copy-paste behavior, so the MLS pattern is the main evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is strongly supported at the building level. Current MLS data shows WOOFRA in 19 of 20 listings, while the public remarks are silent on structure and look largely templated across agents. This is high-confidence building-level evidence rather than a unit-specific mention.
There are 0 explicit mentions of above-ground construction in the remarks, and the only MLS signal is 1 of 20 listings checked for ABOGRO. That is too sparse to support inclusion, and the surrounding remarks read like repetitive developer copy rather than site-verified construction details. This feature is currently unsupported by the public remarks and should be treated as absent until confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as "STR allowed," "NUC," "TVU," "vacation rental allowed," and any 30-day minimum language, but found nothing. With no public remark support, I cannot mark STR as allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as "hotel rental program," "managed by hotel," or branded pool references like Hilton/Trump/Ritz, and found none. Because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," "cannot opt out," or similar restrictions and found nothing. Since the remarks do not support STR at all, a mandatory hotel pool is not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. The remarks focus on unit layouts, parking, and financing, not land tenure details.
The public remarks directly reference a VA assumable loan, which is strong evidence that VA-related financing is available or was used for this unit. I did not need to infer from other financing language because the VA mention is explicit.
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers appear to be a confirmed building feature. Current MLS data shows FIRSPR on 20 of 20 listings, which is extremely strong evidence, and historical data was already nearly unanimous. The public remarks do not explicitly mention sprinklers, but there is no sign of an agent correction or contradiction, so this should be treated as a reliable shared building feature.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A small subset of recent listings indicates mountain views: 2 of 20 MLS records list MOUNTA in the view field. No public remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so the evidence comes from MLS field data rather than agent descriptions. This supports that some units in the building offer mountain views, but not consistently across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, or other sunset-related phrasing. Across the MLS set, 0/20 view descriptions show SUNSET and 19/20 show NONE, so the evidence is consistent and appears to reflect building-level data rather than agent copy-paste variation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.