Kalama Kuu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kalama Kuu
Building Overview
Kalama Kuu in Hawaii Kai — built 2002. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kalama Kuu
Kalama Kuu is a condominium building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, listed as built in 2002. Specific details on building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS records. No additional amenity information (such as a pool, gym, or on-site management) is provided in the data supplied.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and other policy details are not specified in the MLS information reviewed. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, fees, and management details with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence leans positive for common-area electricity: 4 of 6 current listings check OTCOEX, and the public remarks repeatedly reference maintenance fees covering common areas. The wording looks somewhat copy-pasted across listings, so this is supported more by MLS checkbox consistency than by explicit narrative detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing supports hot water being included, and all 6 current listings instead show WTRHTR, which is a strong negative indicator. The public remarks mention water and sewer but do not claim hot water, so the best interpretation is that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
Across recent listings, none check the MLS box for internet being included in association fees (0/2). The current remarks clearly state 'Water and Sewer Included In Maintenance Fee' but mention upgraded HawaiianTel internet only as a separate building/service feature, not a covered utility, indicating that internet is not part of the HOA dues.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed: 5 of 6 current listings check SEWER, and the remarks repeatedly say the maintenance fee includes sewer. The language is consistent across multiple listings and agents, making this a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is clearly supported: 5 of 6 current listings check WATER, and several remarks explicitly say water is included in the maintenance fee. The consistency across listings makes this a very high-confidence feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong multi-listing evidence supports patio/deck amenities. Remarks mention a "lanai," "French doors open directly to the courtyard," and an outdoor retreat/backyard, with similar language repeated across listings, suggesting this is not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across multiple listings shows private yard space. The listings repeatedly mention a "fully enclosed backyard," "enclosed landscaped yard," and "gated courtyard entry," which directly matches the private yard definition and appears in several independent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple current remarks and MLS fields. At least 3 of 6 listings show storage-related amenities/unit features, and several remarks explicitly say "Garage With Storage" or "extra storage." The evidence appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is supported by both the MLS inclusions and the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a 'dedicated laundry room' or 'large laundry room,' which aligns with the current data showing washer/dryer included in 6/6 listings. The repeated phrasing across several remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings have parking features checked and agent remarks explicitly mention a garage and an additional open stall (quotes: 'Garage With Storage and 1 Open Parking', 'attached enclosed garage plus a second nearby parking stall'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building provides parking.
Assigned parking is supported by multiple listing remarks describing an open stall and a nearby second stall, suggesting reserved/assigned parking exists in the building. Historical MLS data is mixed but still favorable (4 of 6 listings show ASSIGN), so this appears to be a genuine feature rather than an isolated agent mistake.
Covered parking is very strongly supported by both MLS checkbox data and the public remarks. Across the listings, the building is repeatedly described as having a garage, including 'two car garage,' 'garage with storage,' and 'attached enclosed garage,' matching the 6/6 MLS covered-parking data.
I searched for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only mention an attached/enclosed garage, one open parking, and a second nearby parking stall, so deeded status is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking charges, rental fees, or any extra cost for parking. The remarks do not mention a fee, so this cannot be extracted from the provided text.
Guest parking is not supported by the current public remarks. Only 1 of 6 MLS listings shows a guest-parking flag, and none of the listing narratives mention visitor parking, so this feature is likely not a reliable building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list system. None were found, so there is no evidence that this building uses one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is mentioned directly in multiple current remarks, including phrases like "central air conditioning" and "Central AC." This aligns with the existing MLS pattern, where most recent listings also checked ACCEN/CENAC or ACCEN, suggesting consistent building-level HVAC rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No supplied remark explicitly describes the building as concrete, and the only construction detail repeated in the remarks is "Steel Frame Construction." With only 2 of 6 MLS listings showing CONCRE and no matching public evidence, confidence is high that concrete construction is not a valid building feature here.
Across the supplied remarks, there are zero mentions of "double wall," "double-wall construction," or similar wording, while "Steel Frame Construction" appears directly in the descriptive text. Even though MLS currently shows DOUWAL in 6/6 listings, the lack of corroboration in multiple agent remarks makes double wall unlikely to be a reliable building feature here.
No analysis available
MLS data indicates masonry & stucco (MASSTU) on several listings (3 of 4 per data source), but 0 of the supplied public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco.' This appears to be MLS checkbox data (possible agent copy/paste), so included as implied with moderate confidence.
Strong evidence: public remarks in at least 2 supplied listings explicitly state 'Steel Frame Construction.' CURRENT MLS data also shows the majority of listings checked STEFRA. Multiple agents/remarks confirm the feature, so include with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks mention "wood frame" or similar language, while one of the repeated listing descriptions explicitly says "Steel Frame Construction." Because only 1 of 6 MLS records shows WOOFRA and the narrative evidence points elsewhere, this feature should be treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR approval terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU. The remarks contain no such language, so there is no evidence that STR is allowed.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, or similar. Nothing was found, and because STR is not evidenced here, this must be false.
I looked for mandatory rental pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in the hotel program. The remarks contain none of that, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold indicators such as lease expiry year, ground lease end date, renewal terms, or any mention of fee simple vs. leasehold. None were present, so there is no basis to extract an expiry year.
The remarks directly say the building is VA approved, which is strong public evidence that VA financing is accepted. No contrary language appears in the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be a consistent building feature in the MLS data, with 6 of 6 listings showing MOUNTA. The public remarks often describe "Koko Crater Views," which is consistent with the mountain-view designation and suggests this is not just a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/landscaped views are supported by some MLS entries and by several remarks referencing a "landscaped backyard" and "enclosed landscaped yard." The evidence is not as strong or universal as the golf course view, but it is enough to include the feature for buyers searching for garden-view units.
Golf course views are very well supported, with 5 of 6 listings showing GOLCOU in the MLS and several public remarks directly calling out the feature. The repeated phrasing across multiple listings strongly suggests this is a real building-level view feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.