Kaioo Terrace

Both MLS property data (12/12 listings) and remarks agree that Kaioo Terrace was built in 1970. The explicit phrase 'Built in 1970' in the remarks confirms this construction year.

Listings include units on floors 1 through 4, and one unit is described as being on the 'top-floor' with no higher floors mentioned. This aligns with property data where the highest observed unit floor is 4, indicating a 4-story building.

No listing remarks refer to the building as an 'X-unit' project or give any total unit count. Without explicit statements or reliable MLS aggregate data, the total number of units cannot be determined from the available information.

Scanned for explicit statements like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. Per numeric rules, if a current value exists and remarks do not specify the field, the current value is retained. Kept 25.00 with low confidence due to lack of corroborating remarks.

Multiple remarks mention the presence of an elevator (e.g., "secured elevator"), but no listing explicitly states the number of elevators. Per rules, numeric counts cannot be changed without an explicit numeric remark, so the current value of 1 is retained. Confidence is moderate because elevator presence is confirmed but quantity is not specified.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks refer to 'The A/C unit is large enough to cool down the whole apartment' and 'The unit includes an air conditioner,' implying window or wall units rather than central AC. With no mention of central air in fees and no MLS support, central AC is not included in the maintenance charges.

Multiple remarks clarify that maintenance fees cover all major utilities 'except cable and internet.' Two different agents use nearly identical exclusions, and no listing suggests cable is included, so cable TV service is not part of the HOA.

Half of the MLS listings explicitly check the code for common area electricity being included in fees, which is typical for a small condo with shared amenities like a pool and secured entry. No remarks suggest separate billing for common area power, supporting that common electricity is included.

The building is consistently described as 'leasehold' with lease-end dates and ground lease rent, not as a cooperative. Since co-op taxes are never mentioned and there is no MLS indication, co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

All 13 listings explicitly or implicitly confirm electricity is included in the monthly maintenance (quotes include 'Monthly maintenance fees include electricity' and 'all main utilities ... electric are included'). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings (likely some copy/paste), supporting high confidence that electricity is included.

All 13 listings mention gas as part of the included utilities (examples: 'maintenance fees include gas' and 'Gas, electric and water'). Multiple agent remarks corroborate this across listings, indicating strong, building-level inclusion of gas.

All 13 listings have HOTWAT in association fee includes and remarks repeatedly state 'all main utilities' or 'water' are covered (e.g., 'Monthly maintenance fees include ... water'). No listings mention individual unit water heaters, and the MLS coding is consistent across agents, supporting high confidence that hot water is included.

Remarks clearly carve out 'cable and internet' as not being part of the monthly maintenance coverage. With no MLS support and repeated explicit exclusions, internet service is not included in the HOA fee.

Although the building is near Waikiki and Ala Moana, none of the remarks reference a marina or boating amenities. The absence of both MLS and textual evidence indicates marina-related costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

All 13 listings mention sewer as an included utility (quotes: 'water, garbage, sewer, gas and electric are included' and 'maintenance fees include ... sewer'). Consistent agent remarks across listings indicate strong building-level inclusion of sewer.

All 13 listings mention water among the included utilities (examples: 'Monthly maintenance fees include electricity, water, sewer, gas, and trash' and 'maintenance fee covers all major utilities'). Multiple agent remarks consistently corroborate that water is included, giving high confidence.

Multiple agents describe the amenity area as having just a pool and jacuzzi/hot tub, with no mention of BBQ or grills. Given the lack of textual support and only 2/12 MLS checkboxes, BBQ facilities likely do not exist or are being mis-entered.

Across 12 listings, there are no mentions of bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks in either remarks or amenities, even though other building features are carefully described. One listing mentions ease of bringing in a surfboard but not any storage facility, reinforcing the conclusion that there is no dedicated bike storage. The absence of any reference across many listings strongly indicates this feature is not available.

Listings focus on walking access to beaches and Ala Moana but do not indicate any on-site dock or boat facility. This, combined with MLS data, strongly indicates there is no boat dock or marina access with the building.

Across multiple agent descriptions, parking and guest parking are highlighted, but a car wash is never mentioned. The low and inconsistent MLS checkbox rate plus zero textual support suggests the car wash entries are likely data errors.

The building is described as a boutique-style condo with pool and hot tub but no shared clubhouse facility. The consistent omission in all remarks and MLS data indicates there is no clubhouse.

All 12 listings emphasize value, low maintenance fees, and basic amenities like pool, hot tub, and secured entry, but none describe concierge or front-desk services. The presence of only a Resident Manager and the absence of any concierge references strongly indicate there is no concierge service.

While pets are permitted (with verification), there is no indication of a dedicated dog park or run on-site. The combination of pet-allowance language without any dog-park reference and no MLS flags supports that this amenity is not present.

Across 12 listings, there are no references to a doorman or lobby attendant, which would be a major selling point if present. Agents instead highlight a Resident Manager and secured access, indicating there is no dedicated doorman service at this property.

Across all provided Kaioo Terrace listings there is no reference to a gym, exercise room, or fitness center. Combined with 0/12 MLS records indicating an exercise room, this strongly suggests the building does not offer this amenity.

Kaioo Terrace is presented as an affordable, boutique condo rather than a full-service luxury high-rise. The absence of any building car service mentions indicates there is no limo or house-car service.

Agents highlight amenities like secured entry, laundry on each floor, and the pool/hot tub but do not mention any community or conference room. This lack of evidence strongly suggests the building does not have a meeting room.

Across 12 listings, agents consistently highlight the pool and jacuzzi but never mention a patio, deck, lanai, or rooftop/outdoor deck feature. Combined with 0/12 MLS amenity checkboxes for PATDEC/COVPAT, this strongly indicates the building does not offer a notable patio/deck amenity that buyers would search for.

While the neighborhood is described as walkable, there is no indication of a dedicated jogging or walking path as an on-site amenity. The absence of such mentions and MLS flags supports that this feature does not exist.

The building is marketed primarily for adults (Waikiki lifestyle, pool, jacuzzi) with no references to children's play facilities. The lack of any playground mention across all listings and MLS data indicates there is no playground amenity.

None of the remarks describe any private or shared yard space; instead they emphasize a pool/jacuzzi courtyard and urban convenience. Given the building type and complete absence of yard-related language, it is very likely there is no private yard amenity.

Amenities are limited to pool, hot tub, laundry, and security, with no golf-related features described. This makes a putting green at Kaioo Terrace extremely unlikely.

While there is clearly a pool/hot-tub area, agents do not use terms like 'recreation deck' or 'amenity deck' that MLS would flag as a recreation area. Given the language used and lack of MLS indication, there is no separately recognized recreation area beyond the pool deck.

Agents consistently describe common amenities but never refer to any recreation or game room. With zero MLS flags and no textual evidence, a dedicated recreation room is very unlikely.

Dining options are clearly off-site in Waikiki and Ala Moana, not within the building itself. With no explicit mention of an in-building restaurant and no MLS indicators, the building does not offer a restaurant amenity.

Amenities are consistently described as ground-level or standard (pool, jacuzzi, laundry), with no suggestion of rooftop features. The complete absence of rooftop references in both remarks and MLS data indicates there is no rooftop amenity area.

Agents repeatedly emphasize the pool and jacuzzi/hot tub but never reference a sauna or steam room. The single MLS checkbox with no textual corroboration suggests a mis-entry rather than an actual sauna amenity.

None of the 12 listings for this building mention storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage in the remarks or MLS amenity fields. Agents repeatedly list other amenities like pool, hot tub, secured entry, laundry on each floor, and guest parking, but never storage, suggesting the building does not provide dedicated storage units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and timeframes.

While one remark notes the ground-floor unit makes it easy to bring in a surfboard, there are no statements about dedicated surfboard storage facilities. No evidence of surfboard storage was found in the public remarks.

Listings repeatedly focus on the pool, hot tub, secured entry, and laundry, with no mention of tennis. The complete absence of tennis references in both remarks and MLS data indicates there is no tennis court at Kaioo Terrace.

Amenities are described as including a trash chute along with floor-level laundry and secured entry, and most MLS records flag a trash chute. This consistent evidence supports that the building has a common trash chute system.

Multiple listings mention unassigned parking, guest parking, and convenient access from parking, but never valet or valet parking. For a small boutique Waikiki condo, valet would be a major selling point, so its total absence in remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates it is not offered.

No listing uses terms like gated, fenced, or walled; instead agents market a "secured building" and "secure entrance," which typically means locked lobby doors, not an enclosed compound. With only a small minority of MLS entries checking GATED/WALFEN and no supporting remarks, this is most likely not a truly gated or walled property.

At least six different listings describe a jacuzzi or hot tub alongside the pool, and MLS data strongly supports a whirlpool amenity. This consistent, detailed language from multiple agents confirms the building has a common whirlpool/hot tub.

All available listings (13/13) and prior MLS data indicate a building pool. Public remarks repeatedly reference a shared pool and hot tub/jacuzzi with phrases like "swimming pool," "pool and hot tub," and "Unwind by the poolside," confirming strong, consistent evidence across multiple agent remarks (likely a building shared amenity).

Across all reviewed listings, agents describe a 'pool and jacuzzi' or 'pool and hot tub' but never a 'heated pool' or 'heated swimming pool.' MLS checkbox data for heated pool features is uniformly unchecked (0/12), so the evidence points to a standard, unheated pool with a separate spa rather than a heated swimming pool. Given the repeated omission of 'heated' in otherwise detailed amenity descriptions, it is highly likely the pool is not heated.

Remarks repeatedly mention a pool and jacuzzi but contain no references to a saltwater/saline pool. Without explicit wording, there is no evidence the pool is salt water.

Across 12 listings, none include washer/dryer in the inclusions, and no remarks mention in‑unit laundry. Instead, agents describe shared facilities (e.g., 'convenient laundry on each floor' and 'a community laundry area on the same floor as unit'), suggesting the building relies on common laundry rather than in‑unit machines. This pattern across multiple listings and agents supports that in‑unit laundry is not available in this building.

Evidence is strong: 8 of 13 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity and several public remarks explicitly mention shared laundry—phrases include 'convenient laundry facilities on each floor' and 'community laundry area on the same floor as unit'. Multiple listings from different agents consistently reference on-site/shared laundry, indicating this is a building-level amenity rather than a single-unit feature or checkbox error.

I searched the remarks for terms like 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'card operated', and 'paid laundry' but found no references. Absence of evidence in public remarks suggests community laundry is not described as paid, but the listing does not explicitly state that laundry is free.

Multiple public remarks explicitly state there are laundry facilities on each floor (e.g., "convenient laundry facilities on each floor" and "convenient laundry on each floor"). This directly supports that community laundry is available floor-by-floor.

All 13 listed units reference on-site parking (13/13). Remarks repeatedly note 'one parking stall' or 'one unassigned parking stall', 'guest parking', and phrases like 'Easy parking accommodates a car or scooter' and 'steps to PARKING!'. The consistency across multiple agent remarks and the MLS parking checkbox data provides strong, corroborating evidence that the building offers parking.

One listing clearly states '1 unassigned parking stall', and no remarks mention assigned, reserved, or deeded parking. With 0/12 MLS records checking the assigned box, the evidence points to generally unassigned stalls rather than assigned parking.

Remarks consistently describe proximity to 'parking' without mentioning a garage or cover, and units emphasize easy access from a surface-style space. Given the complete absence of covered/garage indicators in MLS data, covered parking is unlikely for this building.

Parking is described as unassigned/guest parking and included with the unit in the remarks; there is no language indicating parking is deeded to the unit.

None of the listings mention electric vehicle charging or related amenities. With all MLS records also omitting EV charging, it appears the building does not offer dedicated EV charging stations.

Public remarks indicate parking is included with the unit and explicitly note there is no additional monthly parking cost, so monthly parking fee is $0 per the remarks.

At least one agent highlights 'GUEST PARKING' as a notable feature, emphasizing that residents need not hunt for street parking. Combined with multiple MLS records checking the guest parking feature, this strongly supports the existence of guest parking at the building.

Security descriptions focus on the building and elevators rather than the parking area itself, and no agent notes a gated or controlled parking entry. With SECENT unchecked in all MLS records, there is no solid evidence of secured-entry parking for this building.

Listings refer to 'parking' or a 'parking stall' without describing tandem or back-to-back arrangements. The complete absence of tandem references in remarks and MLS suggests the building does not offer tandem parking as a standard feature.

All marketing focuses on self-park stalls and convenience of direct access from the parking area, with no hint of valet operations. Given the building type and MLS data, valet parking can be safely ruled out.

Searched remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', 'join waitlist' and similar terms; nothing was found. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist, but this is not explicitly stated.

The most detailed listing states the complex "boasts a Resident Manager... and a secured elevator & building," which directly matches keyed or restricted elevator access. Additional listings reference "secured entry" and a "secure entrance," supporting the existence of building-level controlled access to the elevator.

Listings describe secured entry and CCTV (e.g., 'secured entry, CCTV security') and a secured building/elevator, but do not specify electronic key card or fob systems. No explicit mention of card/fob access was found.

None of the 12 listings mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel; instead, they reference a Resident Manager and general secured access. MLS amenities also show no security-guard box checked (0/12), which strongly indicates there is no dedicated guard service at this building.

I searched for language indicating a security patrol or roving/dedicated patrol service and found none. Remarks reference CCTV and resident manager but not a patrol service.

About 7 of 12 listings describe a "secured building," "secure entrance," or "secured entry" but none mention cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring, which agents typically highlight if present. With MLS also showing 0/12 for security systems, the evidence points to physical access control without a formal video surveillance system.

No listings describe central air or HVAC, and 0/12 MLS records mark any central AC feature. Remarks consistently highlight individual room/unit A/C rather than a building-wide system, indicating the building does not offer central AC.

None of the 12 listings indicate split or ductless systems, and there are no textual mentions of mini-splits or similar equipment. The only specific type called out is a window AC, so split AC is very likely not present in this building.

Historical MLS inclusions showed window AC in 12 of 13 listings. In the current public remarks several listings explicitly mention A/C—phrases include "air conditioning", "the A/C unit is large enough to cool down the whole apartment", "window AC", and "new AC"—supporting that units have window/wall air conditioners across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste.

MLS checkbox data across recent listings strongly supports concrete construction—11 of 13 current listings (and previously 10 of 12) list CONCRE as the construction material. Public remarks for the building do not explicitly state construction material but also do not contradict the MLS data; evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings rather than showing signs of copy/paste correction.

Agents do not mark double-wall on any listing, and instead identify concrete/hollow-tile construction. This makes double-wall wood construction very unlikely for this building.

Three separate MLS listings explicitly mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) along with concrete, with no conflicting entries. This pattern across multiple agents strongly indicates the building incorporates hollow-tile construction.

No listing selects the masonry/stucco checkbox and no remarks reference stucco or masonry walls. In the absence of explicit evidence, this feature is not confirmed for the building.

No MLS entries indicate steel-frame construction, and agents instead mark concrete/hollow tile. With no textual references to steel framing, it is very unlikely this is a steel-frame building.

Neither the MLS checkboxes nor the remarks identify a slab foundation. In the absence of explicit statements, slab construction cannot be reliably confirmed from the available data.

No analysis available

No listings select wood frame construction and instead overwhelmingly mark concrete (and sometimes hollow tile). There is no mention in any remarks of wood framing, so the building is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

No MLS entries or remarks reference an above-ground foundation or raised under-structure. Because there is no direct evidence either way, this feature cannot be confirmed for the building.

One MLS listing marks BRICK, but the overwhelming majority mark concrete (and some hollow tile), and no remarks mention any brick construction. This points to a concrete/hollow-tile building rather than a brick structure.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and all available data instead point to concrete/hollow-tile. Given the building type and era, single-wall construction can be confidently ruled out.

Public remarks explicitly prohibit short-term rentals and reference a six-month minimum rental term, so STRs are not allowed.

Because short-term rentals are prohibited and no hotel rental pool is mentioned, the building does not participate in a hotel rental pool.

With STRs disallowed and no mention of a hotel rental program or mandatory participation, there is no mandatory rental/hotel pool requirement.

All observed listings describe their units as leasehold and explicitly note that the 'fee interest is not currently available', with no references to any fee simple units in the building. Given multiple independent agents echo this and no FS listings are seen, it is very likely the building currently has no fee simple units.

All the provided listings refer to the units as leasehold and give consistent lease information, e.g., 'lease that runs through 2033' or 'ground lease expiring 12/31/2033'. No fee purchase option is available according to remarks, so all observed listings are LH and 0 are FS.

The public remarks explicitly state the leasehold ground lease expires in 2033 (one remark gives 12/31/2033). Use 2033 as the lease expiry year.

Listings repeatedly state the property is a cash purchase only and there are no mentions of VA approval or VA loans in the public remarks, so VA financing is not accepted per the remarks.

Searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. With no explicit mention and no existing affirmative field, set to false with medium-low confidence.

Neither the public remarks nor the amenity checkboxes provide positive evidence of a fire sprinkler system. Because older buildings may or may not have sprinklers and agents often omit this detail, the presence or absence of fire sprinklers cannot be reliably determined.

Reviewed all public remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire inspection', or 'life safety compliant' and found none. Because there is no explicit mention and no current affirmative value, the feature is assumed false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

0/12 listings are tagged with ocean views and 8/12 explicitly indicate no view (NONE), with remarks focusing on location and amenities rather than views. Given repeated absence of any ocean-view language, this is best treated as a non–ocean-view building.

MLS data show no mountain view designations and a majority of units explicitly marked as having no view. The consistent lack of any mountain-view mentions indicates buyers should not expect mountain-view units in this building.

There are no MLS view codes or remarks indicating Diamond Head views in any of the 12 listings reviewed. Repeated explicit 'NONE' view entries support treating Diamond Head view as not present for this building.

1 of 12 MLS entries specifically lists a CITY view, suggesting at least some stack/floor orientation offers a city/urban outlook. Most other listings omit views, but this single explicit city designation is enough to infer city-view units exist in the building.

No units are advertised with coastline or shoreline views despite multiple listings across time. Agents focus on walkable access to beaches rather than visual coastal outlooks, so coastline views should be considered absent.

MLS data show no garden-view designation, and units are generally described as having no view. The 'oasis' wording relates to common amenities, not a recognized garden outlook from the residences.

There are no MLS or remarks references to golf course or fairway views, with most units explicitly showing no view. This supports concluding that golf course views are not a characteristic of this building.

No listing tags a marina or harbor view, and the majority are marked with no view at all. Agents instead emphasize proximity to Ala Moana and Waikiki, not water or harbor outlooks, so marina views should not be expected.

No agent remarks mention sunrise or morning exposure, and there are no MLS sunrise view tags. Given the prevalence of 'NONE' in the view field, sunrise views appear not to be a marketed feature here.

No listings (0/13) reference sunset views and 8/13 explicitly list no view. None of the public remarks mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure', or similar language; descriptions focus on tradewinds, proximity to beaches, and pool/jacuzzi. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS fields, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building does not offer sunset views.

MLS and remarks never reference a cemetery, with the majority of units flagged as having no view. Because cemetery views are typically noted when relevant, it is highly likely there are no cemetery views associated with this building.

The remarks reference proximity to Waikiki and nearby attractions but contain no statements such as 'watch fireworks from', 'fireworks view', or 'see fireworks from the unit'. Therefore there is no evidence the building offers a fireworks view.

No analysis available

Multiple independent listings note that pets are allowed, typically with a caveat to verify house rules, and none contradict this. The repeated, explicit references across different agents provide strong evidence that the building allows pets, likely with some conditions.

MLS checkbox data is consistent: 12/13 listings include RESMAN. Public remarks explicitly state 'on-site resident manager' and 'boasts a Resident Manager' in at least two separate listings, and there is no contrary user verification or remarks indicating the manager is no longer present. Evidence across MLS fields and agent remarks is strong that the building has a resident manager.

Remarks describe the property as a leasehold condo with minimum 6‑month rentals and no short-term rentals allowed, and there is no mention of any hotel front desk, hotel program, or condotel structure. This is strong evidence that the building is not a condotel.

Listings consistently describe a leasehold condominium with an AOAO and do not use any co-op terminology such as 'cooperative' or 'shares.' The absence of COOTAX and co-op language across all listings indicates this is not a cooperative building.