Kaioo Terrace

Both MLS property data (12/12 listings) and remarks agree that Kaioo Terrace was built in 1970. The explicit phrase 'Built in 1970' in the remarks confirms this construction year.

Listings include units on floors 1 through 4, and one unit is described as being on the 'top-floor' with no higher floors mentioned. This aligns with property data where the highest observed unit floor is 4, indicating a 4-story building.

No listing remarks refer to the building as an 'X-unit' project or give any total unit count. Without explicit statements or reliable MLS aggregate data, the total number of units cannot be determined from the available information.

The remarks contain a statement about the owner occupying one listed unit, not the percentage of owner-occupied units in the building. Because no explicit percentage or building-wide occupancy description was found, the current value of 25.00 is retained with low confidence.

The remarks explicitly reference a singular secured elevator, which is consistent with the current value of 1. No evidence indicates additional elevators.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks refer to 'The A/C unit is large enough to cool down the whole apartment' and 'The unit includes an air conditioner,' implying window or wall units rather than central AC. With no mention of central air in fees and no MLS support, central AC is not included in the maintenance charges.

Multiple remarks clarify that maintenance fees cover all major utilities 'except cable and internet.' Two different agents use nearly identical exclusions, and no listing suggests cable is included, so cable TV service is not part of the HOA.

Half of the MLS listings explicitly check the code for common area electricity being included in fees, which is typical for a small condo with shared amenities like a pool and secured entry. No remarks suggest separate billing for common area power, supporting that common electricity is included.

The building is consistently described as 'leasehold' with lease-end dates and ground lease rent, not as a cooperative. Since co-op taxes are never mentioned and there is no MLS indication, co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Electricity is consistently included across the building. At least 7 remarks explicitly mention phrases such as "electricity included," "electric," or "all main utilities... are included," and the MLS inclusion field confirms ELECTR on all 15 listings.

Gas is strongly supported across the building. At least 6 remarks state that fees include "gas" or list gas among the included utilities, including "maintenance fees include gas, electric, and trash" and "water, garbage, sewer, gas and electric."

Hot water is supported by the consistent MLS inclusion data, with HOTWAT marked on all 15 listings and no WTRHTR indicator. Remarks generally describe all major utilities or included water utilities rather than naming hot water separately, but there is no contradictory evidence.

Remarks clearly carve out 'cable and internet' as not being part of the monthly maintenance coverage. With no MLS support and repeated explicit exclusions, internet service is not included in the HOA fee.

Although the building is near Waikiki and Ala Moana, none of the remarks reference a marina or boating amenities. The absence of both MLS and textual evidence indicates marina-related costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

Sewer is consistently included. At least 5 remarks explicitly state that fees include "water, sewer, gas, electricity" or "water, garbage, sewer, gas and electric," corroborating the SEWER inclusion on all 15 MLS records.

Water is strongly confirmed across the building. At least 6 remarks explicitly mention "water" as included or describe all major utilities as covered, including "monthly maintenance fees include water, sewer, gas, electricity" and "maintenance fee includes all utilities."

No listings mention BBQ or grilling facilities. Multiple independent remarks describe the amenity area as a pool, jacuzzi, or hot tub without BBQ references, so the 3/15 MLS amenity entries appear to be checkbox copy-paste rather than confirmed building features.

Across 12 listings, there are no mentions of bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks in either remarks or amenities, even though other building features are carefully described. One listing mentions ease of bringing in a surfboard but not any storage facility, reinforcing the conclusion that there is no dedicated bike storage. The absence of any reference across many listings strongly indicates this feature is not available.

Listings focus on walking access to beaches and Ala Moana but do not indicate any on-site dock or boat facility. This, combined with MLS data, strongly indicates there is no boat dock or marina access with the building.

Across multiple agent descriptions, parking and guest parking are highlighted, but a car wash is never mentioned. The low and inconsistent MLS checkbox rate plus zero textual support suggests the car wash entries are likely data errors.

The building is described as a boutique-style condo with pool and hot tub but no shared clubhouse facility. The consistent omission in all remarks and MLS data indicates there is no clubhouse.

All 12 listings emphasize value, low maintenance fees, and basic amenities like pool, hot tub, and secured entry, but none describe concierge or front-desk services. The presence of only a Resident Manager and the absence of any concierge references strongly indicate there is no concierge service.

While pets are permitted (with verification), there is no indication of a dedicated dog park or run on-site. The combination of pet-allowance language without any dog-park reference and no MLS flags supports that this amenity is not present.

Across 12 listings, there are no references to a doorman or lobby attendant, which would be a major selling point if present. Agents instead highlight a Resident Manager and secured access, indicating there is no dedicated doorman service at this property.

Across all provided Kaioo Terrace listings there is no reference to a gym, exercise room, or fitness center. Combined with 0/12 MLS records indicating an exercise room, this strongly suggests the building does not offer this amenity.

Kaioo Terrace is presented as an affordable, boutique condo rather than a full-service luxury high-rise. The absence of any building car service mentions indicates there is no limo or house-car service.

Agents highlight amenities like secured entry, laundry on each floor, and the pool/hot tub but do not mention any community or conference room. This lack of evidence strongly suggests the building does not have a meeting room.

Across 12 listings, agents consistently highlight the pool and jacuzzi but never mention a patio, deck, lanai, or rooftop/outdoor deck feature. Combined with 0/12 MLS amenity checkboxes for PATDEC/COVPAT, this strongly indicates the building does not offer a notable patio/deck amenity that buyers would search for.

No listing confirms a dedicated jogging or walking path at the building. Several remarks call the surrounding Waikiki area walkable or mention nearby activities such as running, but none describe an on-site path, so the 1/15 MLS entry is not supported by the remarks.

The building is marketed primarily for adults (Waikiki lifestyle, pool, jacuzzi) with no references to children's play facilities. The lack of any playground mention across all listings and MLS data indicates there is no playground amenity.

None of the remarks describe any private or shared yard space; instead they emphasize a pool/jacuzzi courtyard and urban convenience. Given the building type and complete absence of yard-related language, it is very likely there is no private yard amenity.

Amenities are limited to pool, hot tub, laundry, and security, with no golf-related features described. This makes a putting green at Kaioo Terrace extremely unlikely.

While there is clearly a pool/hot-tub area, agents do not use terms like 'recreation deck' or 'amenity deck' that MLS would flag as a recreation area. Given the language used and lack of MLS indication, there is no separately recognized recreation area beyond the pool deck.

Agents consistently describe common amenities but never refer to any recreation or game room. With zero MLS flags and no textual evidence, a dedicated recreation room is very unlikely.

Dining options are clearly off-site in Waikiki and Ala Moana, not within the building itself. With no explicit mention of an in-building restaurant and no MLS indicators, the building does not offer a restaurant amenity.

Amenities are consistently described as ground-level or standard (pool, jacuzzi, laundry), with no suggestion of rooftop features. The complete absence of rooftop references in both remarks and MLS data indicates there is no rooftop amenity area.

No current listing remarks mention a sauna, steam room, dry sauna, or wet sauna. Across the provided remarks, agents consistently describe the building’s pool and hot tub/jacuzzi amenities instead, which suggests the sauna checkbox is likely erroneous rather than a missed amenity.

None of the 12 listings for this building mention storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage in the remarks or MLS amenity fields. Agents repeatedly list other amenities like pool, hot tub, secured entry, laundry on each floor, and guest parking, but never storage, suggesting the building does not provide dedicated storage units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and timeframes.

The remarks reference surfing and convenient surfboard transport into one unit. They do not confirm dedicated building storage for surfboards.

Listings repeatedly focus on the pool, hot tub, secured entry, and laundry, with no mention of tennis. The complete absence of tennis references in both remarks and MLS data indicates there is no tennis court at Kaioo Terrace.

Multiple listings explicitly mention the building has a 'refuse chute' or 'trash chute,' while other remarks also refer to trash service being included. The evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and aligns with the historical MLS data, so this feature should be treated as present.

Multiple listings mention unassigned parking, guest parking, and convenient access from parking, but never valet or valet parking. For a small boutique Waikiki condo, valet would be a major selling point, so its total absence in remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates it is not offered.

No listing uses terms like gated, fenced, or walled; instead agents market a "secured building" and "secure entrance," which typically means locked lobby doors, not an enclosed compound. With only a small minority of MLS entries checking GATED/WALFEN and no supporting remarks, this is most likely not a truly gated or walled property.

At least six different listings describe a jacuzzi or hot tub alongside the pool, and MLS data strongly supports a whirlpool amenity. This consistent, detailed language from multiple agents confirms the building has a common whirlpool/hot tub.

The pool is consistently confirmed across multiple listings and agents. At least 12 listings explicitly reference a pool or swimming pool, including phrases such as "pool and hot tub," "Jacuzzi & Pool on site," and "cool off in the pool," making this a strong building-level feature.

Evidence for a heated pool is limited compared with the general pool feature. One of 15 current listings carries the HEAPOO code, but no listing explicitly says "heated pool" or "heated swimming pool"; most remarks mention only a pool with a hot tub or jacuzzi.

A swimming pool is repeatedly confirmed, but its water type is not specified. No saltwater-related wording was found.

Across 12 listings, none include washer/dryer in the inclusions, and no remarks mention in‑unit laundry. Instead, agents describe shared facilities (e.g., 'convenient laundry on each floor' and 'a community laundry area on the same floor as unit'), suggesting the building relies on common laundry rather than in‑unit machines. This pattern across multiple listings and agents supports that in‑unit laundry is not available in this building.

Evidence is strong: 8 of 13 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity and several public remarks explicitly mention shared laundry—phrases include 'convenient laundry facilities on each floor' and 'community laundry area on the same floor as unit'. Multiple listings from different agents consistently reference on-site/shared laundry, indicating this is a building-level amenity rather than a single-unit feature or checkbox error.

The remarks confirm community laundry but do not state that it requires payment. No paid-laundry terms were found, so this remains low confidence.

Multiple public remarks explicitly confirm laundry facilities are available on every floor. The repeated wording is consistent across listings.

Parking is explicitly mentioned in at least 11 of the 15 provided remarks, with repeated references to an included or unassigned parking stall and general parking availability. One listing specifically notes '1 unassigned parking stall AND condo has GUEST PARKING,' confirming the building offers parking across multiple units and agents.

One listing clearly states '1 unassigned parking stall', and no remarks mention assigned, reserved, or deeded parking. With 0/12 MLS records checking the assigned box, the evidence points to generally unassigned stalls rather than assigned parking.

Remarks consistently describe proximity to 'parking' without mentioning a garage or cover, and units emphasize easy access from a surface-style space. Given the complete absence of covered/garage indicators in MLS data, covered parking is unlikely for this building.

The parking descriptions consistently indicate unassigned parking rather than deeded ownership. No remarks mention an owned stall or parking included in the deed.

None of the listings mention electric vehicle charging or related amenities. With all MLS records also omitting EV charging, it appears the building does not offer dedicated EV charging stations.

The remarks do not identify a monthly parking charge. The explicit statement that there is no additional monthly cost supports a parking fee of $0.

At least one agent highlights 'GUEST PARKING' as a notable feature, emphasizing that residents need not hunt for street parking. Combined with multiple MLS records checking the guest parking feature, this strongly supports the existence of guest parking at the building.

Security descriptions focus on the building and elevators rather than the parking area itself, and no agent notes a gated or controlled parking entry. With SECENT unchecked in all MLS records, there is no solid evidence of secured-entry parking for this building.

Listings refer to 'parking' or a 'parking stall' without describing tandem or back-to-back arrangements. The complete absence of tandem references in remarks and MLS suggests the building does not offer tandem parking as a standard feature.

All marketing focuses on self-park stalls and convenience of direct access from the parking area, with no hint of valet operations. Given the building type and MLS data, valet parking can be safely ruled out.

The remarks were searched for parking waitlist language, but none was found. Because there is no direct evidence confirming or denying a waitlist, this is a low-confidence negative determination.

The most detailed listing states the complex "boasts a Resident Manager... and a secured elevator & building," which directly matches keyed or restricted elevator access. Additional listings reference "secured entry" and a "secure entrance," supporting the existence of building-level controlled access to the elevator.

The building clearly has some form of secured access. However, the required card- or fob-based system is not explicitly identified.

None of the 12 listings mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel; instead, they reference a Resident Manager and general secured access. MLS amenities also show no security-guard box checked (0/12), which strongly indicates there is no dedicated guard service at this building.

The remarks mention secured entry, CCTV security, and a resident manager, but none of these establishes a security patrol service. No patrol-related wording was found.

About 7 of 12 listings describe a "secured building," "secure entrance," or "secured entry" but none mention cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring, which agents typically highlight if present. With MLS also showing 0/12 for security systems, the evidence points to physical access control without a formal video surveillance system.

No listings describe central air or HVAC, and 0/12 MLS records mark any central AC feature. Remarks consistently highlight individual room/unit A/C rather than a building-wide system, indicating the building does not offer central AC.

None of the 12 listings indicate split or ductless systems, and there are no textual mentions of mini-splits or similar equipment. The only specific type called out is a window AC, so split AC is very likely not present in this building.

Window or unit-style air conditioning is strongly supported across the listings. Explicit remarks include "window AC," "new AC," "The A/C unit is large enough to cool down the whole apartment," and multiple references to an "air conditioner"; these confirmations appear across several listing versions and agents, not merely a single copied checkbox.

No current public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction. However, 13 of 15 current listings identify CONCRE as the construction material, reinforcing the prior high-confidence conclusion that Kaioo Terrace is a concrete building; the evidence is strong across multiple listings, though it may partly reflect copied MLS data.

Agents do not mark double-wall on any listing, and instead identify concrete/hollow-tile construction. This makes double-wall wood construction very unlikely for this building.

Three separate MLS listings explicitly mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) along with concrete, with no conflicting entries. This pattern across multiple agents strongly indicates the building incorporates hollow-tile construction.

No listing selects the masonry/stucco checkbox and no remarks reference stucco or masonry walls. In the absence of explicit evidence, this feature is not confirmed for the building.

No MLS entries indicate steel-frame construction, and agents instead mark concrete/hollow tile. With no textual references to steel framing, it is very unlikely this is a steel-frame building.

Neither the MLS checkboxes nor the remarks identify a slab foundation. In the absence of explicit statements, slab construction cannot be reliably confirmed from the available data.

No analysis available

No listings select wood frame construction and instead overwhelmingly mark concrete (and sometimes hollow tile). There is no mention in any remarks of wood framing, so the building is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

No MLS entries or remarks reference an above-ground foundation or raised under-structure. Because there is no direct evidence either way, this feature cannot be confirmed for the building.

One MLS listing marks BRICK, but the overwhelming majority mark concrete (and some hollow tile), and no remarks mention any brick construction. This points to a concrete/hollow-tile building rather than a brick structure.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and all available data instead point to concrete/hollow-tile. Given the building type and era, single-wall construction can be confidently ruled out.

The remarks repeatedly prohibit short-term rentals and specify minimum rental terms of six months. This directly indicates that STRs are not allowed.

The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel operations, or a branded rental program. Because STRs are not permitted, participation in a hotel rental pool must also be false.

The remarks do not mention a required or mandatory hotel rental program. Since short-term rentals are prohibited, mandatory hotel-pool participation is also false.

All observed listings describe their units as leasehold and explicitly note that the 'fee interest is not currently available', with no references to any fee simple units in the building. Given multiple independent agents echo this and no FS listings are seen, it is very likely the building currently has no fee simple units.

All the provided listings refer to the units as leasehold and give consistent lease information, e.g., 'lease that runs through 2033' or 'ground lease expiring 12/31/2033'. No fee purchase option is available according to remarks, so all observed listings are LH and 0 are FS.

The property is repeatedly identified as leasehold, with the most specific expiration date being December 31, 2033. No later extension or renewal year is mentioned.

The remarks were searched for VA approval and VA loan language, but none was found. Several listings instead state that the property must be purchased with cash, supporting that VA financing is not indicated.

I searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage language. No such references appear in the remarks, so full HOA insurance coverage cannot be confirmed.

Neither the public remarks nor the amenity checkboxes provide positive evidence of a fire sprinkler system. Because older buildings may or may not have sprinklers and agents often omit this detail, the presence or absence of fire sprinklers cannot be reliably determined.

I searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. None of the remarks mention this feature, so there is no evidence to confirm that the building has passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

0/12 listings are tagged with ocean views and 8/12 explicitly indicate no view (NONE), with remarks focusing on location and amenities rather than views. Given repeated absence of any ocean-view language, this is best treated as a non–ocean-view building.

MLS data show no mountain view designations and a majority of units explicitly marked as having no view. The consistent lack of any mountain-view mentions indicates buyers should not expect mountain-view units in this building.

There are no MLS view codes or remarks indicating Diamond Head views in any of the 12 listings reviewed. Repeated explicit 'NONE' view entries support treating Diamond Head view as not present for this building.

Two current listings identify CITY views, and one historical listing did so previously, indicating that some units in Kaioo Terrace may offer city or urban outlooks. However, the feature is not consistently reported and the provided remarks contain no explicit phrases such as “city view,” “cityscape,” or “downtown view,” so confidence is moderate rather than strong.

No units are advertised with coastline or shoreline views despite multiple listings across time. Agents focus on walkable access to beaches rather than visual coastal outlooks, so coastline views should be considered absent.

MLS data show no garden-view designation, and units are generally described as having no view. The 'oasis' wording relates to common amenities, not a recognized garden outlook from the residences.

There are no MLS or remarks references to golf course or fairway views, with most units explicitly showing no view. This supports concluding that golf course views are not a characteristic of this building.

No listing tags a marina or harbor view, and the majority are marked with no view at all. Agents instead emphasize proximity to Ala Moana and Waikiki, not water or harbor outlooks, so marina views should not be expected.

No agent remarks mention sunrise or morning exposure, and there are no MLS sunrise view tags. Given the prevalence of 'NONE' in the view field, sunrise views appear not to be a marketed feature here.

No current listing remarks reference sunset views; there are 0/14 MLS view descriptions using SUNSET and 13/14 explicitly showing NONE. The remarks repeatedly describe tradewinds, poolside living, and walkability, but nothing about western exposure or evening sun, so the evidence strongly supports no sunset-view feature for this building.

MLS and remarks never reference a cemetery, with the majority of units flagged as having no view. Because cemetery views are typically noted when relevant, it is highly likely there are no cemetery views associated with this building.

The remarks describe proximity to Waikiki, beaches, and local attractions but do not claim a fireworks view from the property. No explicit fireworks-view evidence was found.

No analysis available

Multiple independent listings note that pets are allowed, typically with a caveat to verify house rules, and none contradict this. The repeated, explicit references across different agents provide strong evidence that the building allows pets, likely with some conditions.

MLS checkbox data is consistent: 12/13 listings include RESMAN. Public remarks explicitly state 'on-site resident manager' and 'boasts a Resident Manager' in at least two separate listings, and there is no contrary user verification or remarks indicating the manager is no longer present. Evidence across MLS fields and agent remarks is strong that the building has a resident manager.

Remarks describe the property as a leasehold condo with minimum 6‑month rentals and no short-term rentals allowed, and there is no mention of any hotel front desk, hotel program, or condotel structure. This is strong evidence that the building is not a condotel.

Listings consistently describe a leasehold condominium with an AOAO and do not use any co-op terminology such as 'cooperative' or 'shares.' The absence of COOTAX and co-op language across all listings indicates this is not a cooperative building.