Kaioo Terrace

Both MLS property data (12/12 listings) and remarks agree that Kaioo Terrace was built in 1970. The explicit phrase 'Built in 1970' in the remarks confirms this construction year.

The MLS floor fields and unit-number-derived floors agree through floor 4, and both county records and the state registration report 4 floors.

The county parcel records 40 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 40 units for the single-building registration.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1034. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks support one elevator through the singular phrase "a secured elevator." No remarks mention multiple elevators or a different elevator count, and the current value of 1 is consistent with the building context.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks refer to 'The A/C unit is large enough to cool down the whole apartment' and 'The unit includes an air conditioner,' implying window or wall units rather than central AC. With no mention of central air in fees and no MLS support, central AC is not included in the maintenance charges.

Multiple remarks clarify that maintenance fees cover all major utilities 'except cable and internet.' Two different agents use nearly identical exclusions, and no listing suggests cable is included, so cable TV service is not part of the HOA.

At least 8 current listings mention electricity, electric, or all major utilities being included, including phrases such as “Monthly maintenance fees include electricity” and “all main utilities... are included.” The evidence is reinforced by OTCOEX appearing in 9 of 18 MLS records and by the building’s historically high-confidence status.

The building is consistently described as 'leasehold' with lease-end dates and ground lease rent, not as a cooperative. Since co-op taxes are never mentioned and there is no MLS indication, co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

All 16 listings identify electricity as included in the association fees. At least seven remarks explicitly use phrases such as "electricity included," "electric," or "all main utilities," providing strong confirmation across listings.

All 16 listings include GAS in the MLS association-fee data. At least six remarks explicitly mention gas as included, with several listing gas alongside water, sewer, electricity, and trash.

All 16 listings identify hot water as included, and none indicate individual water heaters. Several remarks state that all major utilities are covered, while the consistent HOTWAT coding provides the strongest evidence.

Remarks clearly carve out 'cable and internet' as not being part of the monthly maintenance coverage. With no MLS support and repeated explicit exclusions, internet service is not included in the HOA fee.

Although the building is near Waikiki and Ala Moana, none of the remarks reference a marina or boating amenities. The absence of both MLS and textual evidence indicates marina-related costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

At least 5 current listings explicitly mention sewer being included in the monthly maintenance fees, often as part of the full utility package. The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and is fully consistent with SEWER appearing in all 18 MLS records.

At least 6 current listings explicitly mention water being included in the maintenance fees, with several describing the complete group of included utilities. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and fully supported by WATER appearing in all 18 MLS records.

No listings mention BBQ or grilling facilities. Multiple independent remarks describe the amenity area as a pool, jacuzzi, or hot tub without BBQ references, so the 3/15 MLS amenity entries appear to be checkbox copy-paste rather than confirmed building features.

Across 12 listings, there are no mentions of bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks in either remarks or amenities, even though other building features are carefully described. One listing mentions ease of bringing in a surfboard but not any storage facility, reinforcing the conclusion that there is no dedicated bike storage. The absence of any reference across many listings strongly indicates this feature is not available.

Listings focus on walking access to beaches and Ala Moana but do not indicate any on-site dock or boat facility. This, combined with MLS data, strongly indicates there is no boat dock or marina access with the building.

None of the 18 provided listing remarks mention a car wash or similar facility. The feature appears in only 3/18 MLS records, with no independent agent descriptions supporting it, so the checkbox data is likely copy-paste or erroneous rather than evidence of a building amenity.

The building is described as a boutique-style condo with pool and hot tub but no shared clubhouse facility. The consistent omission in all remarks and MLS data indicates there is no clubhouse.

All 12 listings emphasize value, low maintenance fees, and basic amenities like pool, hot tub, and secured entry, but none describe concierge or front-desk services. The presence of only a Resident Manager and the absence of any concierge references strongly indicate there is no concierge service.

While pets are permitted (with verification), there is no indication of a dedicated dog park or run on-site. The combination of pet-allowance language without any dog-park reference and no MLS flags supports that this amenity is not present.

Across 12 listings, there are no references to a doorman or lobby attendant, which would be a major selling point if present. Agents instead highlight a Resident Manager and secured access, indicating there is no dedicated doorman service at this property.

Across all provided Kaioo Terrace listings there is no reference to a gym, exercise room, or fitness center. Combined with 0/12 MLS records indicating an exercise room, this strongly suggests the building does not offer this amenity.

Kaioo Terrace is presented as an affordable, boutique condo rather than a full-service luxury high-rise. The absence of any building car service mentions indicates there is no limo or house-car service.

Agents highlight amenities like secured entry, laundry on each floor, and the pool/hot tub but do not mention any community or conference room. This lack of evidence strongly suggests the building does not have a meeting room.

Across 12 listings, agents consistently highlight the pool and jacuzzi but never mention a patio, deck, lanai, or rooftop/outdoor deck feature. Combined with 0/12 MLS amenity checkboxes for PATDEC/COVPAT, this strongly indicates the building does not offer a notable patio/deck amenity that buyers would search for.

No listing confirms a dedicated jogging or walking path at the building. Several remarks call the surrounding Waikiki area walkable or mention nearby activities such as running, but none describe an on-site path, so the 1/15 MLS entry is not supported by the remarks.

The building is marketed primarily for adults (Waikiki lifestyle, pool, jacuzzi) with no references to children's play facilities. The lack of any playground mention across all listings and MLS data indicates there is no playground amenity.

None of the remarks describe any private or shared yard space; instead they emphasize a pool/jacuzzi courtyard and urban convenience. Given the building type and complete absence of yard-related language, it is very likely there is no private yard amenity.

Amenities are limited to pool, hot tub, laundry, and security, with no golf-related features described. This makes a putting green at Kaioo Terrace extremely unlikely.

While there is clearly a pool/hot-tub area, agents do not use terms like 'recreation deck' or 'amenity deck' that MLS would flag as a recreation area. Given the language used and lack of MLS indication, there is no separately recognized recreation area beyond the pool deck.

Agents consistently describe common amenities but never refer to any recreation or game room. With zero MLS flags and no textual evidence, a dedicated recreation room is very unlikely.

Dining options are clearly off-site in Waikiki and Ala Moana, not within the building itself. With no explicit mention of an in-building restaurant and no MLS indicators, the building does not offer a restaurant amenity.

Amenities are consistently described as ground-level or standard (pool, jacuzzi, laundry), with no suggestion of rooftop features. The complete absence of rooftop references in both remarks and MLS data indicates there is no rooftop amenity area.

No current listing remarks mention a sauna, steam room, dry sauna, or wet sauna. Across the provided remarks, agents consistently describe the building’s pool and hot tub/jacuzzi amenities instead, which suggests the sauna checkbox is likely erroneous rather than a missed amenity.

None of the 12 listings for this building mention storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage in the remarks or MLS amenity fields. Agents repeatedly list other amenities like pool, hot tub, secured entry, laundry on each floor, and guest parking, but never storage, suggesting the building does not provide dedicated storage units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and timeframes.

Surfing and transporting a surfboard are referenced in the remarks. The listings do not identify dedicated building storage, so surfboard storage is not supported.

Listings repeatedly focus on the pool, hot tub, secured entry, and laundry, with no mention of tennis. The complete absence of tennis references in both remarks and MLS data indicates there is no tennis court at Kaioo Terrace.

Multiple listings explicitly mention the building has a 'refuse chute' or 'trash chute,' while other remarks also refer to trash service being included. The evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and aligns with the historical MLS data, so this feature should be treated as present.

Multiple listings mention unassigned parking, guest parking, and convenient access from parking, but never valet or valet parking. For a small boutique Waikiki condo, valet would be a major selling point, so its total absence in remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates it is not offered.

No listing uses terms like gated, fenced, or walled; instead agents market a "secured building" and "secure entrance," which typically means locked lobby doors, not an enclosed compound. With only a small minority of MLS entries checking GATED/WALFEN and no supporting remarks, this is most likely not a truly gated or walled property.

At least 10/18 listings check WHIRLP, and multiple independent remarks explicitly state “hot tub,” “pool/hot tub,” “pool/jacuzzi,” or “jacuzzi & pool on site.” This consistently confirms a shared building whirlpool amenity across many agents and listings.

The building's pool is strongly confirmed across multiple listings and agents: at least 14 remarks mention a "pool," "swimming pool," "poolside," or "Jacuzzi & Pool on site." Examples include "Kaioo Terrace offers... a swimming pool," "Unwind by the poolside," and "Amenities include a pool, hot tub." The consistent remarks align with the current MLS data showing pool amenities on 18/18 listings, so this is not merely an isolated checkbox or apparent copy-paste error.

Evidence for a heated pool is limited compared with the general pool feature. One of 15 current listings carries the HEAPOO code, but no listing explicitly says "heated pool" or "heated swimming pool"; most remarks mention only a pool with a hot tub or jacuzzi.

A swimming pool is clearly present, consistent with the building context. No saltwater terminology was found, so a salt pool is not supported.

Across 12 listings, none include washer/dryer in the inclusions, and no remarks mention in‑unit laundry. Instead, agents describe shared facilities (e.g., 'convenient laundry on each floor' and 'a community laundry area on the same floor as unit'), suggesting the building relies on common laundry rather than in‑unit machines. This pattern across multiple listings and agents supports that in‑unit laundry is not available in this building.

At least 6 current public remarks explicitly mention shared laundry facilities, with several describing laundry on every floor or on the same floor as the unit. This aligns with the strong MLS evidence (COMLAU in 9/18 listings) and confirms that community laundry is a building-level amenity rather than an isolated or copied checkbox.

The listings establish that shared laundry is available but do not establish that it requires payment. No paid-laundry terminology was found.

Multiple remarks consistently confirm laundry facilities on every floor. The repeated explicit wording provides very high confidence.

Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: 18/18 current listings contain parking-related MLS features, and at least 11 remarks explicitly mention parking. Key phrases include "parking stall is included," "one unassigned parking stall," "guest parking," and multiple descriptions of units "with parking," indicating consistent evidence across listings rather than a single copy-pasted claim.

One listing clearly states '1 unassigned parking stall', and no remarks mention assigned, reserved, or deeded parking. With 0/12 MLS records checking the assigned box, the evidence points to generally unassigned stalls rather than assigned parking.

Remarks consistently describe proximity to 'parking' without mentioning a garage or cover, and units emphasize easy access from a surface-style space. Given the complete absence of covered/garage indicators in MLS data, covered parking is unlikely for this building.

Although a parking stall is available or included with several listings, the remarks consistently describe it as unassigned or first-come, first-served. No statement indicates that the parking is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.

None of the listings mention electric vehicle charging or related amenities. With all MLS records also omitting EV charging, it appears the building does not offer dedicated EV charging stations.

The remarks do not identify a monthly parking fee. The explicit statement that there is no additional monthly cost supports a parking fee of $0.

At least one agent highlights 'GUEST PARKING' as a notable feature, emphasizing that residents need not hunt for street parking. Combined with multiple MLS records checking the guest parking feature, this strongly supports the existence of guest parking at the building.

Security descriptions focus on the building and elevators rather than the parking area itself, and no agent notes a gated or controlled parking entry. With SECENT unchecked in all MLS records, there is no solid evidence of secured-entry parking for this building.

Listings refer to 'parking' or a 'parking stall' without describing tandem or back-to-back arrangements. The complete absence of tandem references in remarks and MLS suggests the building does not offer tandem parking as a standard feature.

All marketing focuses on self-park stalls and convenience of direct access from the parking area, with no hint of valet operations. Given the building type and MLS data, valet parking can be safely ruled out.

The listings describe unassigned, first-come, first-served parking but do not mention a waitlist system. Because there is no direct confirmation or denial of a waitlist, this is assigned low confidence.

The most detailed listing states the complex "boasts a Resident Manager... and a secured elevator & building," which directly matches keyed or restricted elevator access. Additional listings reference "secured entry" and a "secure entrance," supporting the existence of building-level controlled access to the elevator.

The building has secured access, but the access technology is unspecified. No card- or fob-based security system was identified.

None of the 12 listings mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel; instead, they reference a Resident Manager and general secured access. MLS amenities also show no security-guard box checked (0/12), which strongly indicates there is no dedicated guard service at this building.

The listings mention secured entry, CCTV, and a resident manager, but none of these confirms patrol coverage. No explicit security-patrol evidence was found.

About 7 of 12 listings describe a "secured building," "secure entrance," or "secured entry" but none mention cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring, which agents typically highlight if present. With MLS also showing 0/12 for security systems, the evidence points to physical access control without a formal video surveillance system.

No listings describe central air or HVAC, and 0/12 MLS records mark any central AC feature. Remarks consistently highlight individual room/unit A/C rather than a building-wide system, indicating the building does not offer central AC.

None of the 12 listings indicate split or ductless systems, and there are no textual mentions of mini-splits or similar equipment. The only specific type called out is a window AC, so split AC is very likely not present in this building.

Window or unit-style air conditioning is strongly supported across the building: approximately 8 listings explicitly mention an AC, A/C unit, or window AC. Key phrases include "window AC," "new AC," and multiple descriptions of an apartment-sized A/C unit; this is consistent with the current MLS data showing ACWIUN in 17 of 18 listings and is not limited to a single copied remark.

Concrete construction is supported by 15 of 18 current MLS listings selecting CONCRE as the construction material. The public remarks do not explicitly use phrases such as “concrete building” or “reinforced concrete,” but the strong, repeated MLS data across many listings supports retaining this building-level feature.

Agents do not mark double-wall on any listing, and instead identify concrete/hollow-tile construction. This makes double-wall wood construction very unlikely for this building.

Three separate MLS listings explicitly mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) along with concrete, with no conflicting entries. This pattern across multiple agents strongly indicates the building incorporates hollow-tile construction.

No listing selects the masonry/stucco checkbox and no remarks reference stucco or masonry walls. In the absence of explicit evidence, this feature is not confirmed for the building.

No MLS entries indicate steel-frame construction, and agents instead mark concrete/hollow tile. With no textual references to steel framing, it is very unlikely this is a steel-frame building.

Neither the MLS checkboxes nor the remarks identify a slab foundation. In the absence of explicit statements, slab construction cannot be reliably confirmed from the available data.

No analysis available

No listings select wood frame construction and instead overwhelmingly mark concrete (and sometimes hollow tile). There is no mention in any remarks of wood framing, so the building is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

No MLS entries or remarks reference an above-ground foundation or raised under-structure. Because there is no direct evidence either way, this feature cannot be confirmed for the building.

Two of 16 current listings mark BRICK in the construction materials, but no public remarks mention a "brick exterior," "brick construction," or "brick-and-mortar" building. Because most listings identify concrete and the brick entries may be copied or inconsistent MLS data, support for brick is materially weaker than for concrete.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and all available data instead point to concrete/hollow-tile. Given the building type and era, single-wall construction can be confidently ruled out.

The remarks repeatedly prohibit short-term rentals and specify a minimum rental term of six months. This is direct evidence that short-term rentals are not allowed.

The building does not permit short-term rentals, so participation in a hotel rental pool is not applicable under the prerequisite rules. Searches found no references to a hotel rental program, Hilton pool, or similar arrangement.

Because STRs are not allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false. The remarks also contain no indication that owners must place units in a hotel rental program.

All observed listings describe their units as leasehold and explicitly note that the 'fee interest is not currently available', with no references to any fee simple units in the building. Given multiple independent agents echo this and no FS listings are seen, it is very likely the building currently has no fee simple units.

All the provided listings refer to the units as leasehold and give consistent lease information, e.g., 'lease that runs through 2033' or 'ground lease expiring 12/31/2033'. No fee purchase option is available according to remarks, so all observed listings are LH and 0 are FS.

The property is consistently identified as leasehold. The most specific and repeatedly stated expiration date is December 31, 2033, with no later extension mentioned.

The remarks repeatedly describe the leasehold property as cash-only, which strongly contradicts VA financing availability. Searches for VA-approved, VA financing, and VA loan language found no supporting evidence.

The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, fully covered insurance, and walls-in coverage language. No such references were found, so the listings do not establish that the building is fully insured.

Neither the public remarks nor the amenity checkboxes provide positive evidence of a fire sprinkler system. Because older buildings may or may not have sprinklers and agents often omit this detail, the presence or absence of fire sprinklers cannot be reliably determined.

The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. None of these references were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the evaluation was passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

0/12 listings are tagged with ocean views and 8/12 explicitly indicate no view (NONE), with remarks focusing on location and amenities rather than views. Given repeated absence of any ocean-view language, this is best treated as a non–ocean-view building.

MLS data show no mountain view designations and a majority of units explicitly marked as having no view. The consistent lack of any mountain-view mentions indicates buyers should not expect mountain-view units in this building.

There are no MLS view codes or remarks indicating Diamond Head views in any of the 12 listings reviewed. Repeated explicit 'NONE' view entries support treating Diamond Head view as not present for this building.

Three current listings report CITY in the view descriptions, indicating that at least some Kaioo Terrace units offer city views. The remaining 15 listings report NONE, and the remarks generally discuss location, pool amenities, and Waikiki surroundings without explicitly describing city views, so the evidence is not building-wide or strongly corroborated by agent remarks.

No units are advertised with coastline or shoreline views despite multiple listings across time. Agents focus on walkable access to beaches rather than visual coastal outlooks, so coastline views should be considered absent.

MLS data show no garden-view designation, and units are generally described as having no view. The 'oasis' wording relates to common amenities, not a recognized garden outlook from the residences.

There are no MLS or remarks references to golf course or fairway views, with most units explicitly showing no view. This supports concluding that golf course views are not a characteristic of this building.

No listing tags a marina or harbor view, and the majority are marked with no view at all. Agents instead emphasize proximity to Ala Moana and Waikiki, not water or harbor outlooks, so marina views should not be expected.

No agent remarks mention sunrise or morning exposure, and there are no MLS sunrise view tags. Given the prevalence of 'NONE' in the view field, sunrise views appear not to be a marketed feature here.

None of the provided listings mention sunset views or related phrases such as western exposure or evening sun. The current MLS data is consistently negative (0/16 SUNSET; 14/16 NONE), and the remarks across multiple listings provide no contrary evidence, supporting a strong correction/confirmation that the building should not be identified as offering sunset views.

MLS and remarks never reference a cemetery, with the majority of units flagged as having no view. Because cemetery views are typically noted when relevant, it is highly likely there are no cemetery views associated with this building.

A listing mentions fireworks visible from a walkway near the building. No remark confirms that fireworks can be viewed from a unit or building interior, so this feature is not supported.

No analysis available

Multiple independent listings note that pets are allowed, typically with a caveat to verify house rules, and none contradict this. The repeated, explicit references across different agents provide strong evidence that the building allows pets, likely with some conditions.

At least 3 listings explicitly mention a resident manager, using phrases such as "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," and "boasts a Resident Manager." The feature is also consistently reflected in current MLS data, appearing in 15 of 18 listings, indicating strong building-level evidence rather than an isolated copy-paste entry.

Remarks describe the property as a leasehold condo with minimum 6‑month rentals and no short-term rentals allowed, and there is no mention of any hotel front desk, hotel program, or condotel structure. This is strong evidence that the building is not a condotel.

Listings consistently describe a leasehold condominium with an AOAO and do not use any co-op terminology such as 'cooperative' or 'shares.' The absence of COOTAX and co-op language across all listings indicates this is not a cooperative building.