Kaiolu Sunrise

The dominant MLS value is 1961 (16 of 17 listings), with a lone outlier at 1963 that is likely a data entry error. Remarks consistently describe the building as renovated/converted in 2006, not newly built then, which supports an early-1960s original construction date; therefore 1961 is the best-supported year built.

Remarks call the building a high-rise and one listing notes it is 'just 1 floor below the penthouse,' while MLS unit floor data shows units up to floor 11. Together this strongly indicates an 11-story building, with the penthouse level on the 11th floor. No evidence suggests additional higher floors.

Across all provided Kaiolu Sunrise listings, no agent mentions the building’s total unit count, referring instead only to it as a 'boutique building.' Because the MLS unit-total field is unusable here and there are no corroborating remarks, the actual number of units remains unknown.

The remarks describe the property as suitable for an "owner occupant" or primary residence, but those statements refer to individual buyer suitability rather than the building-wide owner-occupancy rate. No explicit percentage or qualifying occupancy language was found, so the current value of 23% is retained with low confidence.

The remarks were searched for an elevator count, including phrases such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators," but none were found. Because a current value exists and no remarks confirm or deny it, the value of 2 is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly describe window AC units and never mention central AC, and the MLS fee-includes data never checks central AC. This strongly indicates there is no central AC cost included in the maintenance fees.

Across 17 listings for this building, just one lists cable TV in the association fee and none of the remarks note cable as an included utility. This strong skew and lack of narrative support suggest cable is not a standard inclusion in the maintenance fee.

Current MLS data supports inclusion in 16 of 19 listings, consistent with the prior high-confidence finding that common area electricity is included. Public remarks mostly describe building amenities and management but do not specifically quote common-area electricity, so the strongest evidence is the repeated MLS inclusion code across listings.

All remarks and data portray Kaiolu Sunrise as a fee-simple condo with no cooperative structure. With 0/17 listings including co-op taxes and no narrative support, co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

MLS data uniformly omits electricity from the fee-includes field, and remarks only highlight water and sewer as included utilities. This supports that individual unit electricity is billed separately, not through the maintenance fee.

No listings in the provided remarks explicitly say gas is included in the maintenance fee, and the narrative evidence is consistently silent on gas. With only 1 of 18 MLS records checking GAS in association_fee_includes, this looks like an agent/data-entry anomaly rather than a real building feature.

Hot water is marked included in 12 of 19 current MLS records, with no WTRHTR entries indicating individual water heaters. Although the public remarks do not explicitly state “hot water included,” the repeated HOTWAT coding and absence of water-heater indicators provide strong support.

Across all reviewed listings, internet is never marked as included and is never promoted in the remarks. This strongly indicates internet service is not part of the maintenance fee for the building.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of any marina or boat-slip amenity, and no fees related to a marina are ever mentioned. Marina costs are therefore not included in the maintenance fee.

Sewer inclusion is uniformly supported across all 19 listings in the current MLS data. One remark explicitly confirms that the maintenance fee covers sewer, while the 19/19 checkbox pattern strongly corroborates the building-level feature.

Water inclusion is firmly supported by all 19 current MLS listings. The explicit remark that the maintenance fee covers water, together with the consistent 19/19 MLS coding, indicates strong agreement across listings rather than an isolated agent entry.

At least 9 current remarks explicitly mention building BBQ or grilling facilities, using phrases such as "BBQ area," "pool and BBQ deck," "community BBQ," and "barbecue." The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents and strongly confirms a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste-only checkbox.

Multiple listings (at least 5–6) clearly describe building bike storage, including phrases like “surfboard and bike storage,” “3 surfboard storage areas, bike storage,” and “Secured storage area for surf board and bike.” Despite the BSTORAG checkbox being unchecked in all 17 MLS entries, the consistent, specific wording from different agents makes it highly certain that Kaiolu Sunrise offers dedicated bicycle storage areas.

Remarks focus on walking distance to beaches rather than direct waterfront or boating access. Given the location and MLS data, there is no boat dock or marina amenity associated with this building.

Even in units that come with parking, agents do not promote any car wash amenity. Given how thoroughly other building features are described, this strongly indicates there is no car wash facility on-site.

While there is a small amenity/wet bar room, agents never describe a larger clubhouse or community center. The MLS data and repeated remarks both support that there is no formal clubhouse at this property.

Despite detailed descriptions of amenities and staffing, none of the listings use terms like 'concierge' or 'front desk service.' The consistent focus on a site/resident manager without concierge-like duties strongly supports that there is no concierge service.

Several remarks explicitly note 'PET FRIENDLY' rules but stop at that, with no on-site pet exercise area described. Given the detailed amenity descriptions, the absence of any dog-park reference suggests such a facility does not exist.

All listings that discuss staffing refer only to a site/resident manager and do not mention any door or lobby attendant. In a small boutique Waikiki building, the lack of any doorman reference across 17 listings makes it highly likely this feature does not exist.

Across all remarks, amenities are consistently described as pool, BBQ, deck, storage, and laundry, with no reference to any gym or fitness facility. MLS amenity data also shows no agents checking an exercise room, so buyers should not expect a fitness center in this building.

Listings emphasize walkability and nearby bus routes rather than chauffeured services. The complete lack of any car or limo service language confirms this amenity is not offered.

I found no evidence of a meeting room or conference room in the remarks. The amenity language focuses on pool, BBQ, storage, laundry, and a wet bar room, which does not support a true meeting-room feature.

Outdoor patio/deck amenities are strongly confirmed across the listings, with approximately 16 of 19 remarks mentioning a lanai, balcony, patio, deck, or related outdoor space. Multiple agents also describe shared amenities such as a pool deck, patio seating, BBQ/patio areas, and entertaining space, so the evidence is broad and not limited to copy-pasted checkbox data.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki streets, beaches, and the Ala Wai Canal but never note a designated jogging or fitness path on the property. This suggests buyers can run nearby but there is no dedicated jogging path as a building amenity.

Agents thoroughly list family-relevant features but never reference any kids' play structure or playground. This, along with the MLS amenity data, indicates there is no playground at this building.

All listings describe lanais and common pool/BBQ/patio areas, but none reference any private or fenced yard space for units or the building. Given the high-rise, boutique Waikiki condo context and absence of any yard terminology, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas. This corrects any assumption that might arise from generic MLS checkboxes with no supporting remarks.

Marketing focuses on urban Waikiki living with pool/BBQ amenities, not golf-related facilities. The complete absence of putting-green references in remarks and MLS supports that this amenity is not present.

Around 7 listings highlight common outdoor recreation spaces, using phrases such as 'pool and BBQ deck', 'patio & entertaining area', 'amenities area', and 'pool and deck to relax with guests'. These consistent references show the building offers a shared recreation/amenity deck for residents.

At least 3 listings reference interior amenity spaces like a 'shared kitchenette', 'kitchenette area', and 'community wet bar room' associated with the pool/BBQ zone. These descriptions match a multi-purpose recreation/entertainment room available to residents.

Phrases like 'located near restaurants' and 'minutes from...top-rated restaurants' always refer to neighborhood options, not an in-building dining facility. The consistent language and MLS data confirm there is no restaurant within the building itself.

Agents repeatedly refer to 'Ground Floor' recreational amenities, poolside relaxation, and patios without any rooftop references. This consistent pattern strongly indicates there are no rooftop amenities for residents.

Agents give detailed amenity lists without any reference to sauna or steam facilities. The consistent absence of this term suggests the building does not have a sauna.

At least 5–6 recent listings mention dedicated secured or extra storage areas in the building, using phrases like “extra storage for surfboards and bicycles,” “Additional secured surfboard storage,” and “Secured storage area for surf board and bike.” Although only 3/17 MLS records check a storage-related amenity box, the consistent, detailed remarks across multiple agents strongly support that Kaiolu Sunrise offers shared storage areas for residents.

Multiple listings consistently identify surfboard storage as a building amenity. The repeated explicit references provide overwhelming evidence that this feature exists.

Agents repeatedly detail the limited amenity set (pool, BBQ, deck, storage, laundry) without ever mentioning tennis. Combined with the absence of the tennis-court checkbox in MLS, this indicates there is no tennis court at this property.

At least 3 current remarks explicitly identify a building trash-chute system, including "trash chutes" and "trash chute on each floor." The repeated floor-by-floor descriptions across separate listings, combined with the high historical confidence, provide strong confirmation that the feature exists.

Parking is repeatedly characterized as secure, deeded or covered stalls and a gated garage, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. In a small 'boutique' Waikiki condo, valet would be a notable selling point yet is never mentioned. Combined with MLS data showing no VALET amenity, this strongly indicates there is no valet service at the building.

Multiple agents note a 'gated parking garage' and secured parking, suggesting the property includes gated or fenced components around the parking area. This consistent description across separate listings supports treating the building as having a gated/walled perimeter feature relevant to buyers seeking gated access.

One listing notes a 'heated pool', but no unit mentions a hot tub or whirlpool feature alongside it. This pattern, plus MLS data, indicates there is only a pool and no whirlpool/spa amenity.

The building pool is strongly confirmed: 19/19 current MLS listings include the pool amenity, and about 11 listings explicitly reference a pool or pool area. Multiple remarks describe it as a shared building amenity alongside BBQ, patio, or recreation areas, with one specifying a heated pool; this is consistent across numerous listings and not merely unsupported checkbox copying.

Among 17 current listings, 2 mark a heated-pool amenity and one agent’s remarks clearly state the building has a 'heated pool' as part of its common amenities. No remarks contradict this, and the feature is described as a shared building pool, not a unit-specific upgrade. Given the explicit wording and supporting MLS checkboxes, it is likely the building’s pool is heated.

A pool is clearly present, consistent with the building context. No remarks identify it as a saltwater pool, and no qualifying saltwater terminology was found.

Across all provided remarks, no listing claims an in-unit washer/dryer, even for highly upgraded and fully renovated units where such a feature would normally be emphasized. Multiple listings instead highlight shared or coin-operated laundry on each floor, suggesting the building relies on common laundry facilities and likely does not offer in-unit laundry in its units.

At least 13 listings explicitly mention community laundry, including “on-site laundry,” “washer and dryer are available on each floor,” “laundry on each floor,” “shared washer and dryer on every floor,” “community laundry on every floor,” and “coin-operated laundry.” The repeated descriptions across multiple agents strongly corroborate the current MLS amenity data and indicate building-wide shared laundry rather than in-unit facilities.

The remarks explicitly identify the laundry as coin-operated. Coin-operated laundry requires payment, and this is directly supported by the listing language.

Multiple listings explicitly confirm laundry facilities on every floor. The repeated, consistent wording provides overwhelming evidence that this feature exists.

On-site parking is clearly present in the building: several listings reference included or rentable stalls (e.g., “Dedicated parking is included,” “Parking is available to rent after a short wait on the list”). Although some units have no stall, buyers can obtain parking in the building, so it should be treated as a building feature. The MLS pattern (only some units with parking checked) is consistent with limited but existing parking inventory.

At least 6 listings explicitly mention assigned, reserved, dedicated, or deeded parking. The repeated descriptions across multiple agents strongly confirm that Kaiolu Sunrise offers assigned parking, although not every unit includes a stall.

At least 5 listings explicitly describe covered parking or garage parking, including “covered, secured parking” and “gated parking garage.” The evidence from multiple listings confirms that the building offers covered parking, though availability varies by unit.

Several listings directly confirm deeded, dedicated, reserved, or included parking for particular units. Although some units lack parking or use rentable stalls, the building's public remarks establish that deeded parking exists.

Across all provided listings, there is no reference to EV charging, and MLS data never flags EVCHRG. Given how consistently agents market other amenities, this absence strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging stations.

Parking is variously described as deeded, included, unavailable, or rentable after a waitlist. No monthly parking fee, rental price, or additional parking charge was found in the remarks, so the fee is unknown.

Listings emphasize the scarcity and value of regular stalls but never mention any guest or visitor parking, and MLS data is consistent with that. This pattern suggests the building does not offer formal guest parking stalls. Buyers should not expect on-site guest parking here.

At least 6 listings mention secure or gated parking/entry, with specific references to a “gated parking garage” and “covered, secured parking.” These consistent descriptions across multiple agents strongly confirm secured parking access at the building.

Across all listings, parking is described as deeded, covered, or secure, but never as tandem. The MLS data similarly does not show any tandem designation. This makes it very likely that tandem stalls are not a notable or common feature in this building.

The building is marketed as secure and well-managed but never as offering valet or attended parking. Both remarks and MLS checkbox data consistently omit any reference to valet service. This strongly indicates that valet parking is not available at this property.

The remarks directly identify a waiting list for rental parking stalls. This is strong evidence that the building operates a parking waitlist system, even though some units have deeded or assigned parking.

Remarks reference secure entry at the building level but never mention a keyed or fob-access elevator. Given the complete absence of this feature in marketing and MLS checkboxes, a secure/keyed elevator system is very unlikely.

The building is described as secure, but the remarks do not specify a card- or fob-based access system. Generic secure-entry language is insufficient to confirm this feature.

No remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or security personnel, even in detailed amenity descriptions. Listings consistently highlight a resident/site manager and 'secure entry' but never staffed security, suggesting no guard service is provided.

The listings reference a resident or site manager and secured areas, but those do not establish a security patrol service. No qualifying patrol language was found.

Agent remarks omit any reference to cameras or video monitoring, focusing instead on secure entry and a resident/site manager. With no explicit or implied mention of video surveillance across many listings, it is very likely the building does not have a dedicated video security system.

Across 17 listings, no remarks describe central air or HVAC and the central AC checkbox is never selected. Multiple listings instead highlight room/window AC in the bedroom, indicating cooling is provided by individual units rather than a central system.

Remarks across all listings avoid any mention of split or ductless AC, and the MLS split AC checkbox is never used. Instead, agents repeatedly describe window AC or generic room AC in the bedroom, supporting the conclusion that split AC is not present.

Window air conditioning is strongly supported across the building, with at least 3 listings explicitly stating "window AC," "window AC unit," or "new window AC." Additional remarks mention "AC" in the bedroom, and the feature is checked in 15/19 current MLS listings, indicating broad confirmation rather than an isolated or likely copied claim.

None of the 19 provided remarks explicitly says “concrete construction” or “reinforced concrete,” but MLS checkbox data supports concrete in 18 of 19 listings. The strong consistency across listings indicates this is likely a building-level feature rather than a single-agent error.

Double-wall construction is not discussed in any remarks and appears in MLS data only once out of 17 listings. Given the dominant concrete designation, double-wall construction is unlikely to be a defining building characteristic.

Zero of the 19 provided remarks mention “hollow tile” or “hollow tile construction.” Only 1 of 19 MLS records is marked HOLTIL, while 18 of 19 are marked CONCRE, so there is no meaningful multi-listing or agent-confirmed evidence for hollow tile.

Masonry/stucco construction is almost never mentioned in remarks, and just 1 of 17 listings marks this field, versus near-universal selection of concrete. This suggests masonry/stucco is not a primary reported construction type for the building.

None of the listings identify steel frame construction, and agents instead consistently designate the building as concrete. This pattern makes a steel-frame structure unlikely for this property.

No listing reports slab construction or mentions a slab foundation in the remarks. Given this total absence in the MLS data, slab construction is unlikely to be a specifically recognized feature for this building.

No analysis available

No listings report wood frame construction, and all available MLS data instead identifies concrete. Given the building’s high-rise form and location, it is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

The ‘above ground’ field is inconsistently used across listings (5 of 17) and never mentioned in narrative remarks. In contrast, concrete is consistently reported, so ‘above ground’ is not treated as a confirmed construction type here.

No listing mentions brick construction or checks the brick field in MLS. The building’s style and market norms strongly indicate it is not a brick-constructed structure.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and the building is a multi-story concrete tower converted to condos in 2006. This combination effectively rules out traditional single-wall construction.

The building permits monthly or longer-term rentals but imposes a 30-day minimum. Under the defined rules, that restriction means qualifying short-term rentals are not allowed, so STR is false.

The remarks contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool. Because the building does not allow qualifying STR use, the prerequisite for a hotel pool is also not met.

Nothing in the remarks indicates that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool. Since qualifying STR use is not allowed and no mandatory program is described, this feature is false.

At least 3 of the 17 listings clearly describe their tenure as 'fee-simple' or 'FS,' while none mention leasehold, lease rent, or a land lease. This strongly indicates that Kaiolu Sunrise has fee simple units; based on the provided data, 3 of 17 observed listings are explicitly Fee Simple and 0 are Leasehold.

Across all provided remarks, agents repeatedly emphasize 'fee-simple' ownership and 'FS' pricing, but never mention leasehold terms or any lease end date. With 0 of 17 listings indicating LH while multiple stress FS, the evidence strongly suggests there are no Leasehold units in the current data set.

The remarks describe at least one unit as fee-simple but provide no leasehold expiration information. Searches for lease expiry, land lease, ground lease, and renewal dates found no specific year, so the value is unknown.

The building is repeatedly identified as VA approved, and one listing advertises an assumable VA mortgage available to qualified VA and non-VA buyers. This is strong, direct public-remark evidence that VA financing is permitted.

Repeated explicit statements that the building is "100% insured" strongly support full HOA building insurance coverage. The corroborating reference to being fully funded for hurricane insurance further supports a true value with very high confidence.

Agents consistently promote upgrades to the fire alarm system yet make no reference to fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, which would typically be advertised if present. Combined with all 17 MLS entries leaving the fire-sprinkler amenity unchecked, this is strong evidence that the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

The listings provide evidence of fire alarm systems but no explicit statement of FLSE passage, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to mark this feature true; it is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence based on the absence of qualifying language.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No listing remarks reference an ocean, water, or Pacific view, and 0/17 MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN. Multiple agents instead stress being "blocks" or "2.5 blocks" to the beach, indicating access rather than view, so it is very unlikely that any stack in this building offers a true ocean view.

While no remarks explicitly mention mountains, 1 of 17 MLS entries checked a mountain-related view, suggesting at least some exposure toward the Ko'olau or mauka side. Given the building’s Waikiki location and this MLS indication, it is plausible that some units have a mountain view.

Across all provided listings, there are zero references to Diamond Head views in either the MLS view field or narrative remarks. Because Diamond Head views are a strong selling point that agents almost always market, this strongly suggests the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

CITY appears in 9/19 current MLS view fields, indicating that some units likely offer urban or Waikiki city views. No public remark explicitly says “city view,” so the evidence is moderate and relies primarily on repeated MLS checkbox entries rather than independently verified descriptions.

Listings repeatedly emphasize being a short walk to the beach rather than showcasing any coastal or shoreline vistas. The absence of coastline language in both MLS view data and remarks indicates the building does not offer coastline views.

GARDEN appears in 4/19 current MLS listings, and one remark says the lanai is “looking over the palm trees.” Repeated references to tropical pool decks, patios, and landscaped common areas across multiple listings reinforce the high-confidence conclusion that some units have garden or landscaped views.

No public remarks describe golf course views from Kaiolu Sunrise, and there are no consistent references to fairway, greens, or Ala Wai outlooks. The MLS view fields do not support the feature either, with only 1 of 18 listings tagged GOLCOU and 6 explicitly marked NONE, which looks more like an outlier than a building characteristic.

Remarks note being near the Ala Wai Canal but never describe a canal, harbor, or marina view, and the MLS view fields are entirely absent for marina-type views. This pattern indicates the building does not provide meaningful marina or canal views.

SUNRIS appears in only 1/19 current MLS listings, and no remark explicitly describes a sunrise view, morning sun, or eastern exposure. The evidence is therefore weak and may be copy-paste or name-related, but the prior high-confidence building-level determination prevents correcting it to false under the stated rules.

An agent specifically markets "sunset views" from a spacious lanai in a unit in this building. This explicit description shows that some units in Kaiolu Sunrise offer sunset or west-facing views worth highlighting.

All marketing focuses on beaches, shopping, and urban Waikiki amenities, with no mention of nearby cemeteries or cemetery views. Given this context and the complete lack of cemetery-related MLS flags, it is virtually certain there are no cemetery views from this building.

The listings mention Waikiki, beaches, lanai areas, and general sunset or tropical views, but do not state that fireworks can be viewed from a unit or the building. No qualifying fireworks-view language was found.

No analysis available

At least six listings call Kaiolu Sunrise 'pet-friendly', 'PET FRIENDLY, boutique building', or explicitly say 'PETS ALLOWED', with no contradicting 'no pets' language. This repetition across multiple agents and listings strongly confirms that pets are allowed in the building. Buyers seeking pet-friendly properties would reliably find this building suitable.

Resident management is strongly confirmed across the building. At least 7 listings explicitly mention phrases such as “on-site resident manager,” “Resident Manager on-site,” “dedicated Site Manager,” and “full-time site manager,” with consistent references across multiple agents rather than a single isolated checkbox.

Listings frame the property as a fee-simple condominium with 30-day minimum or monthly rentals, not as a hotel-operated building. No remarks reference a hotel front desk, hotel management, or a condotel program, which would be standard language if it operated as a condotel. Combined with MLS data showing no CONDOT style, this strongly supports that it is not a condotel.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium project, not a cooperative; phrases like 'fee-simple unit' and 'converted to condos' are used, and financing discussions (VA approval, seller financing) align with condo, not co-op, structures. The complete absence of co-op language across many listings makes it highly certain that this is not a cooperative building.