Kaiolu Sunrise

The dominant MLS value is 1961 (16 of 17 listings), with a lone outlier at 1963 that is likely a data entry error. Remarks consistently describe the building as renovated/converted in 2006, not newly built then, which supports an early-1960s original construction date; therefore 1961 is the best-supported year built.

Remarks call the building a high-rise and one listing notes it is 'just 1 floor below the penthouse,' while MLS unit floor data shows units up to floor 11. Together this strongly indicates an 11-story building, with the penthouse level on the 11th floor. No evidence suggests additional higher floors.

Across all provided Kaiolu Sunrise listings, no agent mentions the building’s total unit count, referring instead only to it as a 'boutique building.' Because the MLS unit-total field is unusable here and there are no corroborating remarks, the actual number of units remains unknown.

I searched the remarks for any explicit owner-occupancy statements, but found none. Since there is no direct evidence to change it, the current owner-occupancy value of 23% is retained with low confidence.

I searched the public remarks for elevator references such as a count ('2 elevators,' '4 elevators') or wording like 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Per the rules, the current value is kept because there is no explicit evidence to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly describe window AC units and never mention central AC, and the MLS fee-includes data never checks central AC. This strongly indicates there is no central AC cost included in the maintenance fees.

Across 17 listings for this building, just one lists cable TV in the association fee and none of the remarks note cable as an included utility. This strong skew and lack of narrative support suggest cable is not a standard inclusion in the maintenance fee.

The vast majority of listings (15/17) explicitly flag common area electricity as included in the association fee. Remarks about the fee covering 'amenities' are consistent with common-area power being included.

All remarks and data portray Kaiolu Sunrise as a fee-simple condo with no cooperative structure. With 0/17 listings including co-op taxes and no narrative support, co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

MLS data uniformly omits electricity from the fee-includes field, and remarks only highlight water and sewer as included utilities. This supports that individual unit electricity is billed separately, not through the maintenance fee.

No listings in the provided remarks explicitly say gas is included in the maintenance fee, and the narrative evidence is consistently silent on gas. With only 1 of 18 MLS records checking GAS in association_fee_includes, this looks like an agent/data-entry anomaly rather than a real building feature.

Most listings (11/17) explicitly indicate hot water is included in the association fee, and no units advertise individual water heaters. This pattern strongly suggests central hot water is a building service covered by the maintenance fee.

Across all reviewed listings, internet is never marked as included and is never promoted in the remarks. This strongly indicates internet service is not part of the maintenance fee for the building.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of any marina or boat-slip amenity, and no fees related to a marina are ever mentioned. Marina costs are therefore not included in the maintenance fee.

Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly state phrases like "The maintenance fee covers water, sewer, and amenities," and the MLS data is uniform at 18/18 listings checking sewer, which is consistent across the set.

Water inclusion is firmly supported. The remarks explicitly say "The maintenance fee covers water, sewer, and amenities," and this is backed by 18/18 MLS listings marking water as included, indicating stable building-level coverage.

Multiple listings across different remarks confirm shared BBQ amenities, including 'BBQ area,' 'pool and BBQ deck,' 'community BBQ,' and 'BBQ and community wet bar room.' This is consistent across many agents and not just a single copied description, so confidence is very high.

Multiple listings (at least 5–6) clearly describe building bike storage, including phrases like “surfboard and bike storage,” “3 surfboard storage areas, bike storage,” and “Secured storage area for surf board and bike.” Despite the BSTORAG checkbox being unchecked in all 17 MLS entries, the consistent, specific wording from different agents makes it highly certain that Kaiolu Sunrise offers dedicated bicycle storage areas.

Remarks focus on walking distance to beaches rather than direct waterfront or boating access. Given the location and MLS data, there is no boat dock or marina amenity associated with this building.

Even in units that come with parking, agents do not promote any car wash amenity. Given how thoroughly other building features are described, this strongly indicates there is no car wash facility on-site.

While there is a small amenity/wet bar room, agents never describe a larger clubhouse or community center. The MLS data and repeated remarks both support that there is no formal clubhouse at this property.

Despite detailed descriptions of amenities and staffing, none of the listings use terms like 'concierge' or 'front desk service.' The consistent focus on a site/resident manager without concierge-like duties strongly supports that there is no concierge service.

Several remarks explicitly note 'PET FRIENDLY' rules but stop at that, with no on-site pet exercise area described. Given the detailed amenity descriptions, the absence of any dog-park reference suggests such a facility does not exist.

All listings that discuss staffing refer only to a site/resident manager and do not mention any door or lobby attendant. In a small boutique Waikiki building, the lack of any doorman reference across 17 listings makes it highly likely this feature does not exist.

Across all remarks, amenities are consistently described as pool, BBQ, deck, storage, and laundry, with no reference to any gym or fitness facility. MLS amenity data also shows no agents checking an exercise room, so buyers should not expect a fitness center in this building.

Listings emphasize walkability and nearby bus routes rather than chauffeured services. The complete lack of any car or limo service language confirms this amenity is not offered.

I found no evidence of a meeting room or conference room in the remarks. The amenity language focuses on pool, BBQ, storage, laundry, and a wet bar room, which does not support a true meeting-room feature.

Patio/deck amenities are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks mention shared outdoor spaces including a "beautifully maintained pool deck," "patio seating," "patio & entertaining area," and "pool and deck," confirming the building offers resident-accessible outdoor amenity space. The evidence is repeated across several listings and aligns with the historical high-confidence MLS data.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki streets, beaches, and the Ala Wai Canal but never note a designated jogging or fitness path on the property. This suggests buyers can run nearby but there is no dedicated jogging path as a building amenity.

Agents thoroughly list family-relevant features but never reference any kids' play structure or playground. This, along with the MLS amenity data, indicates there is no playground at this building.

All listings describe lanais and common pool/BBQ/patio areas, but none reference any private or fenced yard space for units or the building. Given the high-rise, boutique Waikiki condo context and absence of any yard terminology, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas. This corrects any assumption that might arise from generic MLS checkboxes with no supporting remarks.

Marketing focuses on urban Waikiki living with pool/BBQ amenities, not golf-related facilities. The complete absence of putting-green references in remarks and MLS supports that this amenity is not present.

Around 7 listings highlight common outdoor recreation spaces, using phrases such as 'pool and BBQ deck', 'patio & entertaining area', 'amenities area', and 'pool and deck to relax with guests'. These consistent references show the building offers a shared recreation/amenity deck for residents.

At least 3 listings reference interior amenity spaces like a 'shared kitchenette', 'kitchenette area', and 'community wet bar room' associated with the pool/BBQ zone. These descriptions match a multi-purpose recreation/entertainment room available to residents.

Phrases like 'located near restaurants' and 'minutes from...top-rated restaurants' always refer to neighborhood options, not an in-building dining facility. The consistent language and MLS data confirm there is no restaurant within the building itself.

Agents repeatedly refer to 'Ground Floor' recreational amenities, poolside relaxation, and patios without any rooftop references. This consistent pattern strongly indicates there are no rooftop amenities for residents.

Agents give detailed amenity lists without any reference to sauna or steam facilities. The consistent absence of this term suggests the building does not have a sauna.

At least 5–6 recent listings mention dedicated secured or extra storage areas in the building, using phrases like “extra storage for surfboards and bicycles,” “Additional secured surfboard storage,” and “Secured storage area for surf board and bike.” Although only 3/17 MLS records check a storage-related amenity box, the consistent, detailed remarks across multiple agents strongly support that Kaiolu Sunrise offers shared storage areas for residents.

The remarks repeatedly confirm surfboard storage facilities in the building. The wording is explicit and repeated across multiple listings, so this feature is strongly supported.

Agents repeatedly detail the limited amenity set (pool, BBQ, deck, storage, laundry) without ever mentioning tennis. Combined with the absence of the tennis-court checkbox in MLS, this indicates there is no tennis court at this property.

At least two remarks explicitly mention trash chute facilities, including 'trash chutes — designed for relaxed island life' and 'trash chute on each floor.' Combined with strong historical MLS support, this is a clear building-level amenity.

Parking is repeatedly characterized as secure, deeded or covered stalls and a gated garage, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. In a small 'boutique' Waikiki condo, valet would be a notable selling point yet is never mentioned. Combined with MLS data showing no VALET amenity, this strongly indicates there is no valet service at the building.

Multiple agents note a 'gated parking garage' and secured parking, suggesting the property includes gated or fenced components around the parking area. This consistent description across separate listings supports treating the building as having a gated/walled perimeter feature relevant to buyers seeking gated access.

One listing notes a 'heated pool', but no unit mentions a hot tub or whirlpool feature alongside it. This pattern, plus MLS data, indicates there is only a pool and no whirlpool/spa amenity.

The pool amenity is strongly supported: all 18/18 current MLS listings include the pool checkbox, and many public remarks explicitly mention it. Roughly 10+ listings describe a shared building pool or pool deck, often alongside BBQ and recreation areas, indicating a consistent building-wide amenity rather than agent copy-paste error.

Among 17 current listings, 2 mark a heated-pool amenity and one agent’s remarks clearly state the building has a 'heated pool' as part of its common amenities. No remarks contradict this, and the feature is described as a shared building pool, not a unit-specific upgrade. Given the explicit wording and supporting MLS checkboxes, it is likely the building’s pool is heated.

The building clearly has a pool, but I found no public mention that it is saltwater or saline. I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, and related phrases and found nothing.

Across all provided remarks, no listing claims an in-unit washer/dryer, even for highly upgraded and fully renovated units where such a feature would normally be emphasized. Multiple listings instead highlight shared or coin-operated laundry on each floor, suggesting the building relies on common laundry facilities and likely does not offer in-unit laundry in its units.

Community/shared laundry is strongly supported across many listings, with roughly 10+ remarks explicitly mentioning it. Multiple agents describe the same amenity in different ways—"laundry on each floor," "shared washer and dryer on every floor," "coin-operated Laundry," and "on-site laundry"—which makes this look consistent rather than a copy-paste error.

The public remarks directly identify the laundry as coin-operated, which means it is paid community laundry. I looked for coin-op, quarters, card-operated, and laundry fee language, and found explicit coin-operated wording.

The listings repeatedly confirm community laundry on every floor, including phrasing like "a laundry room on every floor" and "shared washer and dryer on every floor." This is strong, repeated public-remarks evidence, so the feature is clearly present.

On-site parking is clearly present in the building: several listings reference included or rentable stalls (e.g., “Dedicated parking is included,” “Parking is available to rent after a short wait on the list”). Although some units have no stall, buyers can obtain parking in the building, so it should be treated as a building feature. The MLS pattern (only some units with parking checked) is consistent with limited but existing parking inventory.

Multiple listings independently confirm assigned/reserved parking at Kaiolu Sunrise. Remarks include "Dedicated parking is included," "1 secure, deeded parking stall," and "one secured assigned parking stall," showing this is a real building feature rather than a copied checkbox. Evidence is strong across multiple agents and consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern.

Several listings confirm that Kaiolu Sunrise offers covered parking, not just assigned stalls. Remarks mention "covered, secured parking," "covered parking space," and "gated parking garage," indicating the building has covered/garage parking available to some units. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the prior MLS history.

There is strong direct evidence that parking is deeded/owned with the unit. Multiple listings say the stall is dedicated or deeded, which supports a high-confidence true value.

Across all provided listings, there is no reference to EV charging, and MLS data never flags EVCHRG. Given how consistently agents market other amenities, this absence strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging stations.

I looked for monthly parking charges, rental rates, or a specific parking fee, but none was provided. One remark says parking can be rented after a short wait on the list, but it does not state the cost.

Listings emphasize the scarcity and value of regular stalls but never mention any guest or visitor parking, and MLS data is consistent with that. This pattern suggests the building does not offer formal guest parking stalls. Buyers should not expect on-site guest parking here.

Agents repeatedly highlight that the building’s parking is secure and accessed via a gated garage. These consistent descriptions across several different listings show that stalls are behind controlled, secured entry. Buyers can expect parking to be within a secure, restricted-access area.

Across all listings, parking is described as deeded, covered, or secure, but never as tandem. The MLS data similarly does not show any tandem designation. This makes it very likely that tandem stalls are not a notable or common feature in this building.

The building is marketed as secure and well-managed but never as offering valet or attended parking. Both remarks and MLS checkbox data consistently omit any reference to valet service. This strongly indicates that valet parking is not available at this property.

The remarks clearly indicate a parking waitlist system for rental stalls. That direct language supports a high-confidence true value.

Remarks reference secure entry at the building level but never mention a keyed or fob-access elevator. Given the complete absence of this feature in marketing and MLS checkboxes, a secure/keyed elevator system is very unlikely.

I looked for keycard, fob, card reader, and electronic access wording, but the remarks only describe the building as secure or having secured entry. That is not enough to confirm a card-based access system.

No remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or security personnel, even in detailed amenity descriptions. Listings consistently highlight a resident/site manager and 'secure entry' but never staffed security, suggesting no guard service is provided.

I searched for any indication of patrol service, such as security patrol or roving security, and found none. The remarks mention a resident/site manager and secure entry, but not patrol services.

Agent remarks omit any reference to cameras or video monitoring, focusing instead on secure entry and a resident/site manager. With no explicit or implied mention of video surveillance across many listings, it is very likely the building does not have a dedicated video security system.

Across 17 listings, no remarks describe central air or HVAC and the central AC checkbox is never selected. Multiple listings instead highlight room/window AC in the bedroom, indicating cooling is provided by individual units rather than a central system.

Remarks across all listings avoid any mention of split or ductless AC, and the MLS split AC checkbox is never used. Instead, agents repeatedly describe window AC or generic room AC in the bedroom, supporting the conclusion that split AC is not present.

Window air conditioning is clearly present in the building, with many listings explicitly saying "window AC," "window AC unit," or "new window AC." The evidence appears across multiple agents and listings, not just copied checkbox data, and it is reinforced by related mentions like "AC in the bedroom."

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS checkbox data, with 17 of 18 listings indicating CONCRE. None of the remarks dispute this, and several listings describe the building as a high-rise/secure condo tower, which is consistent with concrete construction. This looks like a stable building-level attribute rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

Double-wall construction is not discussed in any remarks and appears in MLS data only once out of 17 listings. Given the dominant concrete designation, double-wall construction is unlikely to be a defining building characteristic.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of hollow tile construction, and agents uniformly identify concrete as the construction material. This makes hollow tile construction very unlikely for this building.

Masonry/stucco construction is almost never mentioned in remarks, and just 1 of 17 listings marks this field, versus near-universal selection of concrete. This suggests masonry/stucco is not a primary reported construction type for the building.

None of the listings identify steel frame construction, and agents instead consistently designate the building as concrete. This pattern makes a steel-frame structure unlikely for this property.

No listing reports slab construction or mentions a slab foundation in the remarks. Given this total absence in the MLS data, slab construction is unlikely to be a specifically recognized feature for this building.

No analysis available

No listings report wood frame construction, and all available MLS data instead identifies concrete. Given the building’s high-rise form and location, it is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

The ‘above ground’ field is inconsistently used across listings (5 of 17) and never mentioned in narrative remarks. In contrast, concrete is consistently reported, so ‘above ground’ is not treated as a confirmed construction type here.

No listing mentions brick construction or checks the brick field in MLS. The building’s style and market norms strongly indicate it is not a brick-constructed structure.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and the building is a multi-story concrete tower converted to condos in 2006. This combination effectively rules out traditional single-wall construction.

The building is clearly described as allowing rentals with a 30-day minimum, which means short-term hotel-style STR is not the typical unrestricted form but rentals are allowed at that minimum. Based on the provided definition, this supports str_allowed as true.

I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel-operated, rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool references, and found none. Since STR is allowed only as monthly/30-day rentals and no hotel program is described, this is false.

I looked for wording indicating a required rental program, mandatory participation, or inability to opt out, but found none. The remarks instead imply flexible owner occupancy and rental use, so this is false.

At least 3 of the 17 listings clearly describe their tenure as 'fee-simple' or 'FS,' while none mention leasehold, lease rent, or a land lease. This strongly indicates that Kaiolu Sunrise has fee simple units; based on the provided data, 3 of 17 observed listings are explicitly Fee Simple and 0 are Leasehold.

Across all provided remarks, agents repeatedly emphasize 'fee-simple' ownership and 'FS' pricing, but never mention leasehold terms or any lease end date. With 0 of 17 listings indicating LH while multiple stress FS, the evidence strongly suggests there are no Leasehold units in the current data set.

I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, renewal years, or similar phrasing, but found none. The remarks instead refer to the property as fee-simple in at least one listing, so there is no basis to extract a lease expiry year.

Public remarks repeatedly and clearly support VA financing eligibility for Kaiolu Sunrise. I found explicit VA approval language in several listings, so this is high-confidence true.

The public remarks provide direct evidence of full building insurance coverage. The phrase '100% insured' is explicit and strongly supports a true value for fully insured walls-in/HOA coverage.

Agents consistently promote upgrades to the fire alarm system yet make no reference to fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, which would typically be advertised if present. Combined with all 17 MLS entries leaving the fire-sprinkler amenity unchecked, this is strong evidence that the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

I looked for phrases like FLSE passed, fire/life safety compliant, fire inspection passed, or fire safety certified and did not find them. The fire alarm system is mentioned, but that is not enough to conclude the building passed the required evaluation, so this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false from the remarks.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No listing remarks reference an ocean, water, or Pacific view, and 0/17 MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN. Multiple agents instead stress being "blocks" or "2.5 blocks" to the beach, indicating access rather than view, so it is very unlikely that any stack in this building offers a true ocean view.

While no remarks explicitly mention mountains, 1 of 17 MLS entries checked a mountain-related view, suggesting at least some exposure toward the Ko'olau or mauka side. Given the building’s Waikiki location and this MLS indication, it is plausible that some units have a mountain view.

Across all provided listings, there are zero references to Diamond Head views in either the MLS view field or narrative remarks. Because Diamond Head views are a strong selling point that agents almost always market, this strongly suggests the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

Several agents checked CITY in the MLS view field, indicating urban skyline or Waikiki city views from part of the building. Even though remarks do not explicitly say "city view," the combination of the MLS data and dense urban location supports including city views as a building feature.

Listings repeatedly emphasize being a short walk to the beach rather than showcasing any coastal or shoreline vistas. The absence of coastline language in both MLS view data and remarks indicates the building does not offer coastline views.

Agents describe looking out over palm trees and relaxing pool/BBQ areas, and one MLS entry explicitly notes a garden view. This supports that some units enjoy a garden or landscaped courtyard view within the project.

No public remarks describe golf course views from Kaiolu Sunrise, and there are no consistent references to fairway, greens, or Ala Wai outlooks. The MLS view fields do not support the feature either, with only 1 of 18 listings tagged GOLCOU and 6 explicitly marked NONE, which looks more like an outlier than a building characteristic.

Remarks note being near the Ala Wai Canal but never describe a canal, harbor, or marina view, and the MLS view fields are entirely absent for marina-type views. This pattern indicates the building does not provide meaningful marina or canal views.

Although the building name includes "Sunrise," no listing remarks or MLS view entries reference actual sunrise or morning-sun views. The consistent omission across many listings indicates sunrise views are not a notable feature here.

An agent specifically markets "sunset views" from a spacious lanai in a unit in this building. This explicit description shows that some units in Kaiolu Sunrise offer sunset or west-facing views worth highlighting.

All marketing focuses on beaches, shopping, and urban Waikiki amenities, with no mention of nearby cemeteries or cemetery views. Given this context and the complete lack of cemetery-related MLS flags, it is virtually certain there are no cemetery views from this building.

I searched for direct references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the building, such as from a lanai or unit, but found none. The remarks mention beaches, sunsets, and lanai use, but not fireworks views.

No analysis available

At least six listings call Kaiolu Sunrise 'pet-friendly', 'PET FRIENDLY, boutique building', or explicitly say 'PETS ALLOWED', with no contradicting 'no pets' language. This repetition across multiple agents and listings strongly confirms that pets are allowed in the building. Buyers seeking pet-friendly properties would reliably find this building suitable.

Resident manager is confirmed across multiple listings and agents. At least 6+ remarks explicitly mention 'on-site resident manager,' 'resident manager on-site,' 'site manager,' or 'full-time site manager,' which is consistent with the historical MLS RESMAN flag appearing in 11/18 listings. The evidence looks strong and repeated rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Listings frame the property as a fee-simple condominium with 30-day minimum or monthly rentals, not as a hotel-operated building. No remarks reference a hotel front desk, hotel management, or a condotel program, which would be standard language if it operated as a condotel. Combined with MLS data showing no CONDOT style, this strongly supports that it is not a condotel.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium project, not a cooperative; phrases like 'fee-simple unit' and 'converted to condos' are used, and financing discussions (VA approval, seller financing) align with condo, not co-op, structures. The complete absence of co-op language across many listings makes it highly certain that this is not a cooperative building.