Kaiolu Sunrise

The dominant MLS value is 1961 (16 of 17 listings), with a lone outlier at 1963 that is likely a data entry error. Remarks consistently describe the building as renovated/converted in 2006, not newly built then, which supports an early-1960s original construction date; therefore 1961 is the best-supported year built.

Remarks call the building a high-rise and one listing notes it is 'just 1 floor below the penthouse,' while MLS unit floor data shows units up to floor 11. Together this strongly indicates an 11-story building, with the penthouse level on the 11th floor. No evidence suggests additional higher floors.

Across all provided Kaiolu Sunrise listings, no agent mentions the building’s total unit count, referring instead only to it as a 'boutique building.' Because the MLS unit-total field is unusable here and there are no corroborating remarks, the actual number of units remains unknown.

Listings describe various use cases (owner occupant, vacation home, investment, 30-day rentals) but never provide a numeric owner-occupancy rate or phrases like 'majority owner occupied.' With no direct evidence, the prior 23% figure is kept.

The remarks reference amenities like pool, BBQ, storage, and laundry on each floor but never mention elevators. With no confirming or contradicting evidence, the prior value of 2 elevators is kept as-is.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly describe window AC units and never mention central AC, and the MLS fee-includes data never checks central AC. This strongly indicates there is no central AC cost included in the maintenance fees.

Across 17 listings for this building, just one lists cable TV in the association fee and none of the remarks note cable as an included utility. This strong skew and lack of narrative support suggest cable is not a standard inclusion in the maintenance fee.

The vast majority of listings (15/17) explicitly flag common area electricity as included in the association fee. Remarks about the fee covering 'amenities' are consistent with common-area power being included.

All remarks and data portray Kaiolu Sunrise as a fee-simple condo with no cooperative structure. With 0/17 listings including co-op taxes and no narrative support, co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

MLS data uniformly omits electricity from the fee-includes field, and remarks only highlight water and sewer as included utilities. This supports that individual unit electricity is billed separately, not through the maintenance fee.

There is no MLS or narrative evidence that gas is included in the maintenance fee. The consistent absence of GAS in fee-includes across all listings strongly indicates gas is not included.

Most listings (11/17) explicitly indicate hot water is included in the association fee, and no units advertise individual water heaters. This pattern strongly suggests central hot water is a building service covered by the maintenance fee.

Across all reviewed listings, internet is never marked as included and is never promoted in the remarks. This strongly indicates internet service is not part of the maintenance fee for the building.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of any marina or boat-slip amenity, and no fees related to a marina are ever mentioned. Marina costs are therefore not included in the maintenance fee.

Sewer is uniformly marked as included in the association fee in every listing, and the public remarks explicitly confirm sewer coverage. This is a well-documented, building-wide inclusion.

Water is consistently flagged as included in the maintenance fee on every listing, and the remarks explicitly state water is covered. This is a firmly established building feature.

At least 9 listings describe on-site BBQ amenities, including phrases like 'pool and BBQ deck', 'BBQ area', and 'community BBQ', often paired with the pool and patio. This is consistently presented as a shared building amenity, strongly confirming common BBQ/grilling facilities.

Multiple listings (at least 5–6) clearly describe building bike storage, including phrases like “surfboard and bike storage,” “3 surfboard storage areas, bike storage,” and “Secured storage area for surf board and bike.” Despite the BSTORAG checkbox being unchecked in all 17 MLS entries, the consistent, specific wording from different agents makes it highly certain that Kaiolu Sunrise offers dedicated bicycle storage areas.

Remarks focus on walking distance to beaches rather than direct waterfront or boating access. Given the location and MLS data, there is no boat dock or marina amenity associated with this building.

Even in units that come with parking, agents do not promote any car wash amenity. Given how thoroughly other building features are described, this strongly indicates there is no car wash facility on-site.

While there is a small amenity/wet bar room, agents never describe a larger clubhouse or community center. The MLS data and repeated remarks both support that there is no formal clubhouse at this property.

Despite detailed descriptions of amenities and staffing, none of the listings use terms like 'concierge' or 'front desk service.' The consistent focus on a site/resident manager without concierge-like duties strongly supports that there is no concierge service.

Several remarks explicitly note 'PET FRIENDLY' rules but stop at that, with no on-site pet exercise area described. Given the detailed amenity descriptions, the absence of any dog-park reference suggests such a facility does not exist.

All listings that discuss staffing refer only to a site/resident manager and do not mention any door or lobby attendant. In a small boutique Waikiki building, the lack of any doorman reference across 17 listings makes it highly likely this feature does not exist.

Across all remarks, amenities are consistently described as pool, BBQ, deck, storage, and laundry, with no reference to any gym or fitness facility. MLS amenity data also shows no agents checking an exercise room, so buyers should not expect a fitness center in this building.

Listings emphasize walkability and nearby bus routes rather than chauffeured services. The complete lack of any car or limo service language confirms this amenity is not offered.

Listings focus on social/entertainment amenities rather than business or meeting facilities, and none use language like 'meeting room' or 'conference room'. The few MLS meeting-room checkboxes are likely copy/paste errors rather than evidence of a dedicated meeting room.

Numerous listings mention shared outdoor areas including a 'BBQ deck', 'patio seating', 'patio & entertaining area', and 'pool and deck', confirming building-level patio/deck amenities. Many units also feature a large or covered lanai, reinforcing that this building offers patio/deck-style outdoor living. The consistency of these terms across several separate listings suggests this is a long-standing, accurate amenity description rather than copy-paste error.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki streets, beaches, and the Ala Wai Canal but never note a designated jogging or fitness path on the property. This suggests buyers can run nearby but there is no dedicated jogging path as a building amenity.

Agents thoroughly list family-relevant features but never reference any kids' play structure or playground. This, along with the MLS amenity data, indicates there is no playground at this building.

All listings describe lanais and common pool/BBQ/patio areas, but none reference any private or fenced yard space for units or the building. Given the high-rise, boutique Waikiki condo context and absence of any yard terminology, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas. This corrects any assumption that might arise from generic MLS checkboxes with no supporting remarks.

Marketing focuses on urban Waikiki living with pool/BBQ amenities, not golf-related facilities. The complete absence of putting-green references in remarks and MLS supports that this amenity is not present.

Around 7 listings highlight common outdoor recreation spaces, using phrases such as 'pool and BBQ deck', 'patio & entertaining area', 'amenities area', and 'pool and deck to relax with guests'. These consistent references show the building offers a shared recreation/amenity deck for residents.

At least 3 listings reference interior amenity spaces like a 'shared kitchenette', 'kitchenette area', and 'community wet bar room' associated with the pool/BBQ zone. These descriptions match a multi-purpose recreation/entertainment room available to residents.

Phrases like 'located near restaurants' and 'minutes from...top-rated restaurants' always refer to neighborhood options, not an in-building dining facility. The consistent language and MLS data confirm there is no restaurant within the building itself.

Agents repeatedly refer to 'Ground Floor' recreational amenities, poolside relaxation, and patios without any rooftop references. This consistent pattern strongly indicates there are no rooftop amenities for residents.

Agents give detailed amenity lists without any reference to sauna or steam facilities. The consistent absence of this term suggests the building does not have a sauna.

At least 5–6 recent listings mention dedicated secured or extra storage areas in the building, using phrases like “extra storage for surfboards and bicycles,” “Additional secured surfboard storage,” and “Secured storage area for surf board and bike.” Although only 3/17 MLS records check a storage-related amenity box, the consistent, detailed remarks across multiple agents strongly support that Kaiolu Sunrise offers shared storage areas for residents.

Public remarks for several units in this building consistently mention surfboard storage, including multiple dedicated surfboard storage areas and secured surfboard storage. These repeated, explicit references provide strong evidence that the building offers surfboard storage facilities. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'surf board', and 'surf storage' and found numerous confirmations.

Agents repeatedly detail the limited amenity set (pool, BBQ, deck, storage, laundry) without ever mentioning tennis. Combined with the absence of the tennis-court checkbox in MLS, this indicates there is no tennis court at this property.

At least 3 listings clearly mention trash chutes, including 'trash chutes — designed for relaxed island life' and 'trash chute on each floor'. Combined with the majority of MLS entries checking this amenity, this confirms a building-wide trash chute system.

Parking is repeatedly characterized as secure, deeded or covered stalls and a gated garage, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. In a small 'boutique' Waikiki condo, valet would be a notable selling point yet is never mentioned. Combined with MLS data showing no VALET amenity, this strongly indicates there is no valet service at the building.

Multiple agents note a 'gated parking garage' and secured parking, suggesting the property includes gated or fenced components around the parking area. This consistent description across separate listings supports treating the building as having a gated/walled perimeter feature relevant to buyers seeking gated access.

One listing notes a 'heated pool', but no unit mentions a hot tub or whirlpool feature alongside it. This pattern, plus MLS data, indicates there is only a pool and no whirlpool/spa amenity.

All 17 current MLS listings indicate a pool amenity, and at least 10 public remarks explicitly mention a shared building pool, often alongside BBQ and deck areas. Phrases like 'Recreational amenities on Ground Floor include pool, barbecue and kitchenette area' and 'relax by the pool and amenities area' confirm a common pool available to residents. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating a stable building feature.

Among 17 current listings, 2 mark a heated-pool amenity and one agent’s remarks clearly state the building has a 'heated pool' as part of its common amenities. No remarks contradict this, and the feature is described as a shared building pool, not a unit-specific upgrade. Given the explicit wording and supporting MLS checkboxes, it is likely the building’s pool is heated.

All remarks were scanned for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and similar terms. While the building clearly has a pool, there is no indication that it is a saltwater pool, so it is assumed to be non-saltwater in the absence of any explicit evidence.

Across all provided remarks, no listing claims an in-unit washer/dryer, even for highly upgraded and fully renovated units where such a feature would normally be emphasized. Multiple listings instead highlight shared or coin-operated laundry on each floor, suggesting the building relies on common laundry facilities and likely does not offer in-unit laundry in its units.

Community/shared laundry is mentioned in roughly ten different listings with phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'shared washer and dryer on every floor,' 'community laundry on every floor,' and 'Coin-operated Laundry... on each floor.' Combined with 15/17 MLS entries checking community laundry, this provides very strong, building-wide evidence that Kaiolu Sunrise has shared laundry facilities on every floor.

The mention of 'Coin-operated Laundry' clearly indicates that the community laundry requires payment (e.g., coins or similar). No remarks suggest that the laundry is free, so it is classified as paid.

Public remarks consistently describe laundry facilities on every floor, using phrases like 'laundry on each floor' and 'laundry room on every floor.' This strongly supports that community laundry is available on every floor of the building.

On-site parking is clearly present in the building: several listings reference included or rentable stalls (e.g., “Dedicated parking is included,” “Parking is available to rent after a short wait on the list”). Although some units have no stall, buyers can obtain parking in the building, so it should be treated as a building feature. The MLS pattern (only some units with parking checked) is consistent with limited but existing parking inventory.

Multiple agents independently describe stalls as deeded, dedicated, or assigned, indicating reserved parking is part of the building’s offering. Not all units include a stall, but those that do have clearly designated stalls. Buyers seeking assigned parking can find units with this feature in the building.

Several listings describe the parking as covered or part of a gated garage, confirming that the building offers covered stalls. While not every unit has a stall, covered parking is clearly available for some owners. This makes covered parking a relevant feature for the building as a whole.

Remarks explicitly mention deeded parking stalls for some units, so the building offers deeded/owned parking. Not all units have parking, but where present it can be deeded.

Across all provided listings, there is no reference to EV charging, and MLS data never flags EVCHRG. Given how consistently agents market other amenities, this absence strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging stations.

No listing specifies any monthly parking fee or charge, only that some parking is rented. The actual parking fee amount cannot be determined from the available remarks.

Listings emphasize the scarcity and value of regular stalls but never mention any guest or visitor parking, and MLS data is consistent with that. This pattern suggests the building does not offer formal guest parking stalls. Buyers should not expect on-site guest parking here.

Agents repeatedly highlight that the building’s parking is secure and accessed via a gated garage. These consistent descriptions across several different listings show that stalls are behind controlled, secured entry. Buyers can expect parking to be within a secure, restricted-access area.

Across all listings, parking is described as deeded, covered, or secure, but never as tandem. The MLS data similarly does not show any tandem designation. This makes it very likely that tandem stalls are not a notable or common feature in this building.

The building is marketed as secure and well-managed but never as offering valet or attended parking. Both remarks and MLS checkbox data consistently omit any reference to valet service. This strongly indicates that valet parking is not available at this property.

The building uses a waitlist for rental parking stalls, as explicitly described in the remarks. This indicates an organized parking waiting list system is in place.

Remarks reference secure entry at the building level but never mention a keyed or fob-access elevator. Given the complete absence of this feature in marketing and MLS checkboxes, a secure/keyed elevator system is very unlikely.

Listings consistently describe the building as secure and mention a secured entrance and gated parking, but never specify card or fob-based access. Searched for terms like key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access and found none. Based on the lack of explicit evidence, card/fob access is assumed not present.

No remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or security personnel, even in detailed amenity descriptions. Listings consistently highlight a resident/site manager and 'secure entry' but never staffed security, suggesting no guard service is provided.

The remarks reference a resident/site manager and generally secure/secured entry but do not mention any form of security patrol. Searched for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building and found no matches. In the absence of evidence, a patrol service is considered unlikely.

Agent remarks omit any reference to cameras or video monitoring, focusing instead on secure entry and a resident/site manager. With no explicit or implied mention of video surveillance across many listings, it is very likely the building does not have a dedicated video security system.

Across 17 listings, no remarks describe central air or HVAC and the central AC checkbox is never selected. Multiple listings instead highlight room/window AC in the bedroom, indicating cooling is provided by individual units rather than a central system.

Remarks across all listings avoid any mention of split or ductless AC, and the MLS split AC checkbox is never used. Instead, agents repeatedly describe window AC or generic room AC in the bedroom, supporting the conclusion that split AC is not present.

Several listings clearly state features like 'window AC', 'window AC unit', and 'AC in the bedroom', and 13 of 17 MLS entries check the window AC inclusion. This consistent pattern across different units and agents strongly supports that the building offers/permits window or wall AC units.

MLS construction data is highly consistent: 16 of 17 listings mark the building as concrete construction. Combined with the building’s high-rise form in Waikiki, this strongly supports reinforced concrete as the primary construction type rather than wood, steel, or brick.

Double-wall construction is not discussed in any remarks and appears in MLS data only once out of 17 listings. Given the dominant concrete designation, double-wall construction is unlikely to be a defining building characteristic.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of hollow tile construction, and agents uniformly identify concrete as the construction material. This makes hollow tile construction very unlikely for this building.

Masonry/stucco construction is almost never mentioned in remarks, and just 1 of 17 listings marks this field, versus near-universal selection of concrete. This suggests masonry/stucco is not a primary reported construction type for the building.

None of the listings identify steel frame construction, and agents instead consistently designate the building as concrete. This pattern makes a steel-frame structure unlikely for this property.

No listing reports slab construction or mentions a slab foundation in the remarks. Given this total absence in the MLS data, slab construction is unlikely to be a specifically recognized feature for this building.

No analysis available

No listings report wood frame construction, and all available MLS data instead identifies concrete. Given the building’s high-rise form and location, it is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

The ‘above ground’ field is inconsistently used across listings (5 of 17) and never mentioned in narrative remarks. In contrast, concrete is consistently reported, so ‘above ground’ is not treated as a confirmed construction type here.

No listing mentions brick construction or checks the brick field in MLS. The building’s style and market norms strongly indicate it is not a brick-constructed structure.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and the building is a multi-story concrete tower converted to condos in 2006. This combination effectively rules out traditional single-wall construction.

Public remarks consistently describe Kaiolu Sunrise as a 30-day minimum rental building, suitable for monthly rentals, snowbirds, and standard investment use. No listings mention legal daily/weekly STR, NUC, TVU, or hotel-type transient use, so short-term rentals are considered not allowed.

Remarks describe a boutique condo with standard amenities (pool, BBQ, resident/site manager) and 30-day minimum rentals, not a hotel-operated property. There are no references to any hotel rental pool or branded hotel program, so a hotel pool is considered not present.

No remarks suggest any requirement to join a rental or hotel pool, and units are marketed for owner-occupants, part-time users, or standard rentals. Since there is no evidence of a hotel pool at all, mandatory participation cannot apply.

At least 3 of the 17 listings clearly describe their tenure as 'fee-simple' or 'FS,' while none mention leasehold, lease rent, or a land lease. This strongly indicates that Kaiolu Sunrise has fee simple units; based on the provided data, 3 of 17 observed listings are explicitly Fee Simple and 0 are Leasehold.

Across all provided remarks, agents repeatedly emphasize 'fee-simple' ownership and 'FS' pricing, but never mention leasehold terms or any lease end date. With 0 of 17 listings indicating LH while multiple stress FS, the evidence strongly suggests there are no Leasehold units in the current data set.

Because the units advertised are fee-simple and there is no discussion of leasehold conditions or expiration years, there is no basis to identify any lease expiry date for this building. If any portion of the building is leasehold, the expiration year is not disclosed in these remarks.

Public remarks repeatedly and clearly describe Kaiolu Sunrise as VA-approved. This indicates the building qualifies for VA financing, not just an individual assumable VA loan on a single unit. Given the consistency across several listings, this is very likely accurate.

Phrases like '100% insured' strongly indicate full building insurance coverage by the HOA. Given these explicit statements across listings, the building is marked as fully insured with high confidence.

Agents consistently promote upgrades to the fire alarm system yet make no reference to fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, which would typically be advertised if present. Combined with all 17 MLS entries leaving the fire-sprinkler amenity unchecked, this is strong evidence that the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

Searched for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'life safety compliant', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. In the absence of explicit confirmation, this is treated as not verified/passed per rules.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No listing remarks reference an ocean, water, or Pacific view, and 0/17 MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN. Multiple agents instead stress being "blocks" or "2.5 blocks" to the beach, indicating access rather than view, so it is very unlikely that any stack in this building offers a true ocean view.

While no remarks explicitly mention mountains, 1 of 17 MLS entries checked a mountain-related view, suggesting at least some exposure toward the Ko'olau or mauka side. Given the building’s Waikiki location and this MLS indication, it is plausible that some units have a mountain view.

Across all provided listings, there are zero references to Diamond Head views in either the MLS view field or narrative remarks. Because Diamond Head views are a strong selling point that agents almost always market, this strongly suggests the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

Several agents checked CITY in the MLS view field, indicating urban skyline or Waikiki city views from part of the building. Even though remarks do not explicitly say "city view," the combination of the MLS data and dense urban location supports including city views as a building feature.

Listings repeatedly emphasize being a short walk to the beach rather than showcasing any coastal or shoreline vistas. The absence of coastline language in both MLS view data and remarks indicates the building does not offer coastline views.

Agents describe looking out over palm trees and relaxing pool/BBQ areas, and one MLS entry explicitly notes a garden view. This supports that some units enjoy a garden or landscaped courtyard view within the project.

No narrative remarks or MLS view fields refer to a golf course or Ala Wai course outlook from this building. Given how marketable golf course views are, their complete absence across many listings strongly supports that there is no golf course view from any stack here.

Remarks note being near the Ala Wai Canal but never describe a canal, harbor, or marina view, and the MLS view fields are entirely absent for marina-type views. This pattern indicates the building does not provide meaningful marina or canal views.

Although the building name includes "Sunrise," no listing remarks or MLS view entries reference actual sunrise or morning-sun views. The consistent omission across many listings indicates sunrise views are not a notable feature here.

An agent specifically markets "sunset views" from a spacious lanai in a unit in this building. This explicit description shows that some units in Kaiolu Sunrise offer sunset or west-facing views worth highlighting.

All marketing focuses on beaches, shopping, and urban Waikiki amenities, with no mention of nearby cemeteries or cemetery views. Given this context and the complete lack of cemetery-related MLS flags, it is virtually certain there are no cemetery views from this building.

Remarks reference the Waikiki lifestyle, beaches, and nearby entertainment but never mention views of Friday night fireworks or watching fireworks from the lanai or unit. Given this absence across many listings, it is moderately likely the building does not specifically feature a fireworks view.

No analysis available

At least six listings call Kaiolu Sunrise 'pet-friendly', 'PET FRIENDLY, boutique building', or explicitly say 'PETS ALLOWED', with no contradicting 'no pets' language. This repetition across multiple agents and listings strongly confirms that pets are allowed in the building. Buyers seeking pet-friendly properties would reliably find this building suitable.

Multiple independent listings describe Kaiolu Sunrise as having an on-site or full-time site/resident manager, emphasizing that the building is 'well managed' with a 'dedicated' manager. With both the remarks and MLS amenities agreeing (RESMAN checked on most listings), there is very strong evidence of an on-site resident manager.

Listings frame the property as a fee-simple condominium with 30-day minimum or monthly rentals, not as a hotel-operated building. No remarks reference a hotel front desk, hotel management, or a condotel program, which would be standard language if it operated as a condotel. Combined with MLS data showing no CONDOT style, this strongly supports that it is not a condotel.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium project, not a cooperative; phrases like 'fee-simple unit' and 'converted to condos' are used, and financing discussions (VA approval, seller financing) align with condo, not co-op, structures. The complete absence of co-op language across many listings makes it highly certain that this is not a cooperative building.