Kaimuki Jade
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaimuki Jade
Building Overview
Kaimuki Jade in Kaimuki (built 1967) — concrete construction with ocean and mountain views and a resident manager.
About Kaimuki Jade
Kaimuki Jade is a residential building located in the Kaimuki neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1967 and is of concrete construction. Units in the building report ocean and mountain views.
Key features include an on-site resident manager. No other common-area amenities are listed in the provided data. The building’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking is noted as available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS-derived data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify these details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures or wording such as "80% owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. Because this is a numeric field and the remarks provide no percentage or qualifying language, the value remains unknown.
The listings directly confirm that the building has two elevators, so the current value is supported by the remarks. I did not infer from building size or unit count because the remarks provide an explicit count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The strongest evidence is the current MLS association_fee_includes field: 10 of 18 listings include OTCOEX, indicating common area electricity is part of maintenance fees. The public remarks do not explicitly say “common area electricity,” but they do consistently reference shared building infrastructure (elevators, laundry on every floor), which fits the building-level fee structure. Overall this looks like a repeated MLS data point across listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current MLS support for hot water being included in maintenance fees: 0 of 17 listings mark HOTWAT. Several listings instead note water heaters (WTRHTR), which points away from HOA-provided hot water and toward unit-level equipment.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is one of the clearest building-level inclusions in the dataset. All 17 current listings mark sewer as included, and the public remarks are consistent with that longstanding MLS pattern.
Water inclusion is confirmed across the board in the current MLS data, with 17 of 17 listings checked. The public remarks contain no contrary evidence, so this appears to be a stable building-wide HOA inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many listings for Kaimuki Jade. At least 7-10+ remarks mention it in some form, with phrases like "assigned storage on each floor," "storage locker same as unit number," and "dedicated storage locker for each unit," suggesting this is a shared building feature rather than a one-off unit perk. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS storage checkboxes.
I looked for surfboard-specific storage terms such as surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage. The remarks only mention general storage lockers and cabinets, which do not confirm surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building feature based on MLS data: 11 of 17 current listings include the TRACHU amenity. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, but there is also no evidence contradicting it, so this looks more like an unremarked building amenity than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a swimming pool, including saltwater or saline pool wording, and found none. Given the current building context indicates there is no pool, this feature is best marked false.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms the building has shared/community laundry. Across many listings, agents consistently describe it as laundry on every floor, community laundry, or coin-operated laundry, and the MLS amenity data is also high confidence with 15/18 listings showing COMLAU. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The remarks explicitly identify the laundry as coin-operated, meaning residents must pay to use it. I searched for coin-op, coin laundry, quarters, and similar wording and found clear confirmation.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm that the building has community laundry on every floor. I looked for floor-by-floor laundry language and found it stated directly in several listings, so this feature is strongly supported.
Parking is strongly and consistently supported across the building. Every current MLS listing has a parking feature checked, and multiple independent remarks explicitly mention parking stalls, open parking, or unassigned parking. The evidence appears robust rather than copy-paste noise because it is repeated across many listings and unit types.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe parking as unassigned, open, or first-come-first-served rather than owned with the unit. That is strong evidence the parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, rental costs, or any separate parking assessment and found none. The remarks instead suggest parking is included with the unit, so no fee is indicated in the public text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found none. The remarks point to open or first-come-first-served parking, which is inconsistent with a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as key card access, fob entry, or electronic card readers. The listings only mention general secure entry, so there is no public-remarks evidence for card-based security.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related security wording and found nothing. The building is described as secure-entry, but that is not the same as an active security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be the building standard for Kaimuki Jade. Across the remarks, there are no contradictions and one listing explicitly references 'sleek concrete floors,' while the MLS history shows 17 of 18 listings marked CONCRE. This is strong building-level evidence and looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste issue.
Double wall construction is not supported by the listing remarks. Only 1 of 18 current listings carries the DOUWAL checkbox, and no agent remarks mention double-wall construction or any equivalent wording. This looks like an unverified MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
There is no meaningful public-remark support for hollow tile construction. With only 1 of 18 current listings checking HOLTIL and no remarks using phrases like 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction,' this feature looks like a likely copy-paste or data-entry mistake rather than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for above-ground construction is mostly implied by the architecture descriptions rather than directly stated. Multiple remarks describe Kaimuki Jade as a '16 floor round high-rise' with a 'central open-air atrium' and 'puka in the middle,' suggesting an above-ground building design, though the MLS checkbox is not widely used across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related language such as short-term rental allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-night rules and found nothing. Because there is no public-remarks support for STR permission, this is treated as not indicated.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed either, a hotel pool is not supported by the remarks.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required enrollment, or cannot opt out and found none. There is also no evidence of any STR program at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for land tenure terms such as leasehold, ground lease, lease expires, or a 4-digit expiry year, but none were provided. Since no specific expiration year appears anywhere in the remarks, the lease expiry remains unknown.
I searched the listings for explicit phrases like VA approved, VA financing, or VA loans accepted and found none. With no supporting mention in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated by the public text.
I looked for phrases indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance at all. Without an explicit statement, this feature remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for language such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," and similar terms, but found nothing. With no explicit evidence in the public remarks, I cannot mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Building offers ocean views: CURRENT MLS data lists OCEAN in 2/16 view_descriptions and several listing remarks explicitly mention 'ocean' or 'ocean & Waikiki' (quotes include 'panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains' and 'views of Diamond Head, Ocean and Waikiki'). Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across listings; while MLS checkbox counts are modest, the repeated explicit phrasing indicates some units have ocean views.
Multiple listings clearly mention mountain views, including "stunning panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains," "majestic mountains & picturesque valley," and "views of Diamond Head, Ocean and Waikiki" alongside mountain references. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and appears to be genuine, not just copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly describe city views, including "stunning panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains," "the glittering night lights of Kaimuki and the city beyond," and an "overlooking Kaimuki town" remark. This is strong multi-listing confirmation from different remarks, not just a single copied description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by several listings and remarks, not just MLS checkbox data. At least 3 listings explicitly reference sunset-related views or evening light, including phrases like "Sunsets never get old here" and "cotton candy-colored clouds at sunset." This looks like genuine building-level availability for some units rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to fireworks views, such as seeing fireworks from a lanai, unit, or building, and found none. The remarks mention city, ocean, mountain, and valley views, but not fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No public remarks across the 16 listings mention a 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. While 4 of 16 MLS records have the RESMAN checkbox checked, the absence of any remarks and lack of prior confirmation indicate the amenity is likely mischecked by some agents; evidence is moderate (implied) rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.