Kaimuki Jade
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaimuki Jade
Building Overview
Kaimuki Jade in Kaimuki (built 1967) — concrete construction with ocean and mountain views and a resident manager.
About Kaimuki Jade
Kaimuki Jade is a residential building located in the Kaimuki neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1967 and is of concrete construction. Units in the building report ocean and mountain views.
Key features include an on-site resident manager. No other common-area amenities are listed in the provided data. The building’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking is noted as available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS-derived data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify these details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures or wording such as "80% owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the percentage cannot be determined from the available text.
The remarks provide a clear explicit count of the building's elevators. I did not rely on inference from the building size or layout because the listing directly states the number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The strongest evidence is the current MLS association_fee_includes field: 10 of 18 listings include OTCOEX, indicating common area electricity is part of maintenance fees. The public remarks do not explicitly say “common area electricity,” but they do consistently reference shared building infrastructure (elevators, laundry on every floor), which fits the building-level fee structure. Overall this looks like a repeated MLS data point across listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current MLS support for hot water being included in maintenance fees: 0 of 17 listings mark HOTWAT. Several listings instead note water heaters (WTRHTR), which points away from HOA-provided hot water and toward unit-level equipment.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is one of the clearest building-level inclusions in the dataset. All 17 current listings mark sewer as included, and the public remarks are consistent with that longstanding MLS pattern.
Water inclusion is confirmed across the board in the current MLS data, with 17 of 17 listings checked. The public remarks contain no contrary evidence, so this appears to be a stable building-wide HOA inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many listings for Kaimuki Jade. At least 7-10+ remarks mention it in some form, with phrases like "assigned storage on each floor," "storage locker same as unit number," and "dedicated storage locker for each unit," suggesting this is a shared building feature rather than a one-off unit perk. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS storage checkboxes.
I searched for surfboard-storage-related phrases and only found general storage lockers and cabinets. The remarks do not specifically mention surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building feature based on MLS data: 11 of 17 current listings include the TRACHU amenity. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, but there is also no evidence contradicting it, so this looks more like an unremarked building amenity than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence of any swimming pool in the public remarks, and the current building context says the property has no pool. Without a pool, there is no basis to mark it as saltwater.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms the building has shared/community laundry. Across many listings, agents consistently describe it as laundry on every floor, community laundry, or coin-operated laundry, and the MLS amenity data is also high confidence with 15/18 listings showing COMLAU. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The listings explicitly identify the laundry as coin-operated, which means users must pay to use it. This is clear and repeated enough to support a high-confidence true value.
The remarks consistently confirm community laundry facilities on every floor of the building. This is directly stated multiple times in the listings, making it a very strong match.
Parking is strongly and consistently supported across the building. Every current MLS listing has a parking feature checked, and multiple independent remarks explicitly mention parking stalls, open parking, or unassigned parking. The evidence appears robust rather than copy-paste noise because it is repeated across many listings and unit types.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe parking as unassigned/open rather than owned with the unit. That is strong evidence the parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking charges, monthly parking fees, or rental costs, but none were stated. Because the remarks do not specify any fee, this remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list system and found none. The remarks instead point to open, first-come-first-served parking, which argues against a waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit card-based access terms such as key card, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry. The remarks only mention secure key entry, which is not enough to confirm a card/fob system.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to patrol service or roving security and found nothing. The building may be secured, but the public remarks do not indicate that it has a security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be the building standard for Kaimuki Jade. Across the remarks, there are no contradictions and one listing explicitly references 'sleek concrete floors,' while the MLS history shows 17 of 18 listings marked CONCRE. This is strong building-level evidence and looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste issue.
Double wall construction is not supported by the listing remarks. Only 1 of 18 current listings carries the DOUWAL checkbox, and no agent remarks mention double-wall construction or any equivalent wording. This looks like an unverified MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
There is no meaningful public-remark support for hollow tile construction. With only 1 of 18 current listings checking HOLTIL and no remarks using phrases like 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction,' this feature looks like a likely copy-paste or data-entry mistake rather than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for above-ground construction is mostly implied by the architecture descriptions rather than directly stated. Multiple remarks describe Kaimuki Jade as a '16 floor round high-rise' with a 'central open-air atrium' and 'puka in the middle,' suggesting an above-ground building design, though the MLS checkbox is not widely used across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-night rules, and found no support for STR permission. With no evidence of STR allowance in the public remarks, the building is treated as not allowing it.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar language, and found none. Since STR allowance is not evidenced either, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for signs that participation in a rental pool is mandatory, such as required enrollment or inability to opt out, and found nothing. There is also no evidence that any STR or hotel pool exists here, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for land tenure language such as leasehold, ground lease, lease expires, or a 4-digit expiry year, but found nothing. Since no lease expiration year is stated in the public remarks, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any VA-specific financing language and found none. With no explicit VA approval mention across the listings, this is treated as not indicated in the remarks.
I looked for phrases like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," and other indications that the HOA carries complete building coverage. The remarks only mention special assessments being paid, not insurance coverage, so there is no evidence supporting this feature.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for language such as "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "passed fire inspection," and similar fire/life safety compliance wording. Nothing in the provided remarks confirms that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Building offers ocean views: CURRENT MLS data lists OCEAN in 2/16 view_descriptions and several listing remarks explicitly mention 'ocean' or 'ocean & Waikiki' (quotes include 'panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains' and 'views of Diamond Head, Ocean and Waikiki'). Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across listings; while MLS checkbox counts are modest, the repeated explicit phrasing indicates some units have ocean views.
Multiple listings clearly mention mountain views, including "stunning panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains," "majestic mountains & picturesque valley," and "views of Diamond Head, Ocean and Waikiki" alongside mountain references. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and appears to be genuine, not just copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly describe city views, including "stunning panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains," "the glittering night lights of Kaimuki and the city beyond," and an "overlooking Kaimuki town" remark. This is strong multi-listing confirmation from different remarks, not just a single copied description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by several listings and remarks, not just MLS checkbox data. At least 3 listings explicitly reference sunset-related views or evening light, including phrases like "Sunsets never get old here" and "cotton candy-colored clouds at sunset." This looks like genuine building-level availability for some units rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to fireworks views, such as watching fireworks from the lanai or from the unit, and found none. The remarks mention city, ocean, mountain, and valley views, but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
No public remarks across the 16 listings mention a 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. While 4 of 16 MLS records have the RESMAN checkbox checked, the absence of any remarks and lack of prior confirmation indicate the amenity is likely mischecked by some agents; evidence is moderate (implied) rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.