Kaimuki Jade
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaimuki Jade
Building Overview
Kaimuki Jade in Kaimuki (built 1967) — concrete construction with ocean and mountain views and a resident manager.
About Kaimuki Jade
Kaimuki Jade is a residential building located in the Kaimuki neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1967 and is of concrete construction. Units in the building report ocean and mountain views.
Key features include an on-site resident manager. No other common-area amenities are listed in the provided data. The building’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking is noted as available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS-derived data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify these details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit percentages or descriptors of owner-occupancy and found none. Because there is no numeric value in the remarks and no prior verified numeric value to retain, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple listings mention an elevator (e.g., 'Secured Building. Elevator.' and references to high-rise floors), confirming presence of at least one elevator. No remark gives a numeric count (e.g., '2 elevators' or 'four elevators'), and numeric elevator counts must not be guessed from context alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Association operations for this multi-story elevator building almost certainly include common area electricity, and 8 of 15 current MLS listings mark an 'other common expenses' inclusion that typically covers such power costs. No listings contradict this, suggesting agents who omitted the checkbox likely did so inconsistently rather than indicating a different fee structure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all 15 current listings, agents never mark hot water as included in the HOA fee, and several explicitly reference unit water heaters (WTRHTR). This pattern supports that hot water is not a building-supplied utility covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 16 current MLS listings (16/16) have 'sewer' listed in association_fee_includes, indicating maintenance fees include sewer. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly mention sewer, but the uniform checkbox across multiple agents and previous High confidence support including this feature.
All 16 current MLS listings (16/16) have 'water' listed in association_fee_includes, indicating maintenance fees include water. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention water, the consistent checkbox data across multiple listings and prior High confidence support including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 7) explicitly reference building storage: phrases include "community laundry and assigned storage on each floor," "Storage locker same as unit number," "extra storage locker too," and "dedicated storage locker for each unit." Evidence is consistent across different listings/agents and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data (9/16 listings flagged storage), supporting a high-confidence true value.
There are multiple mentions of storage lockers and assigned storage per unit/floor, but no explicit mention of surfboard or board storage; I searched for 'surfboard', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found none.
No analysis available
10 of 16 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, and historical data previously marked this feature with high confidence. However, none of the ~15 public remarks mention a "trash chute", "garbage chute", or "refuse chute", suggesting some agent copy/paste; because most MLS entries still list it, the building is retained as having a trash chute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to any pool in the public remarks; combined with the building context (pool = False), a saltwater pool is effectively ruled out.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building has shared laundry: 13 of 16 current MLS listings list community laundry (COMLAU) and numerous public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry on every floor', 'coin-op laundry on every floor', or 'laundry room on every floor'. Mentions appear across multiple agents and listings, so the building-level shared laundry is well-supported.
Listings repeatedly describe the laundry as coin-operated (coin-op), indicating the community laundry requires payment.
Multiple remarks explicitly state there is a community/shared laundry on every floor (including 'Coin-Op laundry on every floor' and 'Laundry Room on every floor'), so this feature is confirmed.
Parking is strongly supported: 16 of 16 current MLS entries list a parking feature and numerous listings explicitly state 'one unassigned parking stall', 'open parking', or 'UNLIMITED unassigned first come first serve parking'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks (not isolated), indicating the building offers parking (including unassigned/open stalls and moped parking).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings consistently describe unassigned/open, first-come-first-serve parking and state 'Included is one unassigned parking stall' or '1 open parking stall', which indicates parking is not deeded to units.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found none. With no parking-fee information in the remarks, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist' or similar phrasing and found none; instead, parking is described as unassigned and first-come-first-serve, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Although the building is described as 'Secured Building', listings do not specify card/fob/keycard access. I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' and found no explicit evidence.
No analysis available
Listings were searched for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrol service' and none were found, so there is no evidence of a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong MLS evidence: 15 of 16 current listings list construction_materials as CONCRE, indicating broad agreement among listing agents. Remarks reference a "16 floor round high-rise" and one unit mentions "sleek concrete floors," and there is no contradictory owner/site-verified information — overall evidence across multiple listings is consistent with a concrete building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as a “16 floor round high-rise building” and “iconic circular building” with a central open-air atrium, which by nature is above ground. Even though only 2 of 15 MLS listings check the ABOGRO box, the consistent high-rise descriptions across many agents’ remarks provide strong evidence that the residential structure is entirely above ground. No remarks suggest any below-grade or partially subterranean construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed remarks for STR language (allowed, permitted, TVU/NUC, or minimum night rules). None of the listings mention STR permissions or hotel rental programs; absence of such wording suggests STRs are not represented as allowed in the public remarks.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or brand-managed rental references and found none. Because STR allowance was not indicated, hotel pool participation is not present in the remarks.
Looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'must participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found none. With no rental pool or STR program referenced, there is no evidence of mandatory pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 4-digit lease expiry years and leasehold language (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'ground lease ends'). Found no explicit lease expiry year; since no leasehold year is provided, return null.
Searched all remarks for VA language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. Absence of any VA-specific wording in the listings suggests the building is not represented as VA-approved in the public remarks.
I reviewed the public remarks for language indicating HOA-provided full/walls-in building insurance and found none. Since there is no explicit statement that the building is fully insured by the HOA, this field is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for terms indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection') and found no matches. With no explicit statement and no current value to retain, absence in remarks suggests the building has not been documented as having passed—set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Building offers ocean views: CURRENT MLS data lists OCEAN in 2/16 view_descriptions and several listing remarks explicitly mention 'ocean' or 'ocean & Waikiki' (quotes include 'panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains' and 'views of Diamond Head, Ocean and Waikiki'). Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across listings; while MLS checkbox counts are modest, the repeated explicit phrasing indicates some units have ocean views.
Building offers mountain views: historical data was High confidence and CURRENT MLS lists MOUNTA in 3/16 view_descriptions; multiple public remarks explicitly reference 'majestic mountains', 'Koʻolau Mountains', and 'Palolo Valley', demonstrating consistent confirmation across several listings and agents.
No analysis available
Building offers city views: historical data was High confidence and CURRENT MLS lists CITY in 6/16 view_descriptions. Multiple listing remarks include phrases like 'panoramic views of the city, ocean, and mountains' and 'glittering night lights of Kaimuki and the city beyond', showing consistent, explicit confirmation across several agents' remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe panoramic city, ocean, Diamond Head and sunset views but contain no statement about viewing fireworks from the building. I searched for phrases like 'fireworks', 'watch fireworks', and 'fireworks view' and found none.
No analysis available
No public remarks across the 16 listings mention a 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. While 4 of 16 MLS records have the RESMAN checkbox checked, the absence of any remarks and lack of prior confirmation indicate the amenity is likely mischecked by some agents; evidence is moderate (implied) rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.