Kaikoi at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaikoi at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kaikoi at Hoopili in Ewa — built 2021, concrete construction with pool and BBQ area, split AC and sunset views.
About Kaikoi at Hoopili
Based on MLS data, Kaikoi at Hoopili is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 2021. The MLS does not provide specific unit size ranges in the supplied data. Construction is listed as concrete.
According to available records, building amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. Units are noted to have split air conditioning and some listings mention sunset views.
Parking is available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and any fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for references like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar owner-occupancy statements and found none. The remarks do mention affordable housing restrictions and buyer approval requirements, but that does not provide an owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the remarks for any elevator references such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a specific count like "4 elevators" and found none. Since this is a low-rise/ground-floor oriented community, the remarks still do not provide enough evidence to confirm a building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports this feature. 19 of 20 current MLS listings include OTCOEX, and the remarks consistently reference shared common areas and amenities rather than a one-off agent claim. The pattern looks building-level and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points strongly to no hot water being included. Across the listings, 0 of 20 mark HOTWAT, and many remarks explicitly mention an in-unit or exterior water heater, such as 'electric water heater' and 'water heater located outside in a separate storage room.' This is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current MLS listings list SEWER as included in association fees, though none of the public remarks explicitly state "sewer included." This is moderate, checkbox-based evidence across multiple listings and could be agent-entered; confidence is moderate (implied by MLS data but not corroborated in remarks).
Eight of 20 MLS listings indicate WATER is included in association fees, but none of the public remarks explicitly state "water included," and many remarks note unit water heaters. The MLS checkbox data implies water may be included for some units, but lack of corroborating remarks reduces confidence to a moderate level.
Strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings and agents supports BBQ as a building/community amenity. Several remarks explicitly mention BBQ facilities or a BBQ area, and the historical MLS data shows BBQ in 19 of 20 listings, suggesting this is a consistent shared feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very limited MLS checkbox presence (1/17) with zero supporting public-remark evidence: no listing text mentions 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. Given the lack of corroborating remarks across multiple agents, the single MLS check appears erroneous; confidence is high that a building-level car wash is not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park is consistently and explicitly referenced across the remarks, with multiple listings naming a dog park and one mentioning the "Bark-and-Ride Park." Combined with historical MLS data showing DGPRK in 17 of 20 listings, this is high-confidence evidence of a true shared pet amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak/absent evidence: although ~7 MLS checkboxes previously indicated meeting_room (per CURRENT MLS data), 0 listings explicitly say 'meeting room' or 'conference room' in the remarks—only 'event spaces', 'party rooms', and 'community center/event spaces' are mentioned. This suggests agents may be using generic event/party wording rather than a formal meeting/conference room.
Several listings for this building explicitly mention outdoor living areas, including “two lanai's,” a “private lanai overlooking the future Hoopili garden,” an “open lanai area,” and a “private deck.” Combined with 4 of 15 MLS records checking the patio/deck amenities box, this strongly suggests that multiple units in the building offer patio/lanai/deck spaces. Buyers seeking homes with patios or lanais would reasonably consider this building as offering that feature.
Moderate evidence: ~3-5 listings explicitly reference "walking paths" or "walking paths among the community amenities" and many listings mention access to parks and open green spaces. Combined with MLS checks (8/18), this implies shared walking/jogging paths are available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence for a recreation area is moderately strong: several remarks describe common/recreation spaces, open green areas, and amenity areas tied to the pool and community center. While wording varies by listing, the repeated references across multiple remarks support that the building/community offers shared recreation space.
Multiple listings reference a recreation room/recreation rooms, including phrases like "The Kaikoi community offers recreation rooms" and "access to a recreation room." With historical MLS support across many listings, this appears to be a real shared amenity, not just an agent checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 separate listings explicitly reference an 'exterior storage area' or 'separate storage room' (e.g., 'electric water heater is conveniently located in the exterior storage area' and 'water heater located outside in a separate storage room'), and MLS checkboxes show 4/20 listings listing storage. Although historical remarks previously did not mention lockers, current explicit mentions across multiple agents support including storage units/lockers for the building.
No analysis available
No supporting remarks: 0 listings mention a tennis court. Several listings reference "pickleball and basketball courts" but none say "tennis court". Given only 1/18 MLS checkboxes and consistent absence in agent remarks, tennis court is likely not a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly reference "a pool," "community amenities including a pool," and the "SoHo Community Center & Pool" or "SoHo Community Center, which includes a pool." The evidence appears consistent and repeated across many listings, not just a single agent copy-paste, and it aligns with the current MLS amenity checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is very well supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "full-size washer & dryer," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "washer and dryer included," and one remark notes a dedicated "laundry area." This aligns with the MLS inclusions history showing 20/20 current listings include washer/dryer, suggesting consistent data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at the building. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 tandem uncovered parking stalls," "2 assigned tandem parking stalls," "1 reserved parking stall," and "2 side by side assigned parking spaces," indicating consistent building-level parking availability rather than a one-off unit feature.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly state "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 assigned tandem parking stalls," and "1 reserved parking stall," which is consistent across different remarks and not limited to a single agent write-up.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The listings consistently describe assigned/reserved stalls, which indicates parking exists but not that it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, monthly parking rental, or additional parking cost and found none. The remarks only discuss assigned, reserved, or tandem stalls without stating a separate fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building/community. The remarks consistently reference "ample guest stalls" and "plenty of guest parking," reinforcing the MLS checkbox data and suggesting this is a recurring amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is clearly offered. Several listings specifically mention tandem stalls, including "2 tandem uncovered parking stalls" and "2 assigned tandem parking stalls," which aligns well with the current MLS data and confirms the feature at the building level.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "waitlist," "waiting list," and "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. The listings emphasize that parking is already assigned or reserved, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is confirmed across many current listings: multiple remarks explicitly say 'split A/C,' 'split-system air conditioning,' 'split A/C system,' and 'split air conditioning in every room.' This appears repeatedly across numerous listings and agents, not as a one-off copy-paste error, and it matches the historical MLS pattern of 20/20 listings including ACSPL.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a building-wide feature based on 19 of 20 current MLS listings using the DOUWAL code. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, which suggests the MLS data is likely being copied consistently rather than independently described, but the prevalence is strong enough to include.
No analysis available
7 of 17 MLS unit entries list MASSTU, yet in the 17 public remarks reviewed there are no mentions of 'masonry', 'stucco', or similar construction descriptions. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and absent historical confidence, the masonry/stucco designation is not supported by available agent-written descriptions.
Five of 20 current MLS listings include the STEFRA construction material flag; however, none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar phrasing. Evidence relies on multiple agent-entered MLS checkboxes (possible copy/paste), so confidence is moderate.
Eight of 20 current MLS listings include the SLAB foundation flag and historical data showed medium confidence for slab foundation. No public remarks explicitly reference a concrete slab, so the conclusion is primarily driven by MLS checkbox data with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
12 of 18 recent MLS unit listings include the WOOFRA (wood frame) construction code, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction'. Evidence is moderate and may reflect repeated agent checkbox use/copy-paste rather than explicit descriptions in remarks, so include as possible but with only moderate confidence.
Above-ground construction is present in a minority of current MLS listings (8 of 20) and was previously only Medium confidence. No remarks explicitly mention 'above ground construction' or similar wording, so the evidence is mixed, but it is still likely a valid building feature available in some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental permission language such as "STR allowed," "vacation rental," "TVU," or similar and found none. The remarks do not show that short-term rentals are permitted, so this is treated as false.
I searched for hotel pool language such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," "Hilton pool," or similar and found nothing. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this also cannot be true.
I looked for phrases like "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out" and found none. There is also no evidence of any hotel rental program, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit lease expiry references such as "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension wording and found nothing. The remarks do not indicate a leasehold expiry year, so the value is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-specific language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no evidence in the listings, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false based on absence of support.
I searched for language indicating full HOA/building insurance coverage such as "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," or "comprehensive building insurance" and found none. The remarks do not address insurance coverage, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
One listing explicitly states 'Rest easy with the security of an installed fire sprinkler system,' and 8 of 20 current MLS listings have the FIRSPR amenity checked. Evidence is present across multiple listings/agents (checkboxes) and at least one remark directly mentions an installed sprinkler system, indicating the building offers fire sprinklers.
I looked for phrases like "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "passed fire inspection," or "fire safety certified" and found nothing. The mention of a fire sprinkler system is positive for safety, but it is not the same as a documented fire/life safety evaluation pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but real evidence that some units in the building have mountain-type views. One remark explicitly says "gorgeous Diamond Head views," and current MLS data shows 2 of 20 listings with MOUNTA in the view field, while 15 of 20 list NONE. This looks like a feature available only in some units, not a building-wide standard, and the wording is not consistent enough to suggest a broad copy-paste pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing (1 of ~20 public remarks) explicitly mentions enjoying "an evening sunset" from a private deck/lanai, while 16 of 20 listings list View = NONE in current MLS descriptions. The sunset reference appears in one unit's public remarks and may describe that unit's exposure rather than a building-wide feature, so inclusion is cautious (confidence 0.72).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks across the provided listings mention a 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager,' while only 4 of 20 MLS listings have RESMAN checked. Given the absence of any explicit remarks and the low, inconsistent checkbox presence (likely copy/paste), there is strong evidence the building does not have a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.