Kaikea at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaikea at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kaikea at Hoopili in Ewa (built 2022) with pool and sunset views.
About Kaikea at Hoopili
Kaikea at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2022. According to available records, specific unit sizes and construction details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. Units feature split air conditioning, and the property is noted for sunset views. The MLS indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as available with guest parking provided. The management company is not identified in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No such information appears in the remarks, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I found clear references to elevator access in the public remarks, including secured elevator entry. However, I did not find any explicit statement like "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators," so the number of elevators cannot be determined from the remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. MLS data shows 15 of 20 current listings with OTCOEX, while the public remarks mostly describe amenities and finishes without explicitly naming the utility. The repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not indicated as an association-fee inclusion for this building. None of the 20 current MLS listings list HOTWAT, and 17 of 20 list WTRHTR, which is a strong sign that units have their own water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. Public remarks do not contradict this and mostly support unit-level hot water equipment rather than HOA-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 current MLS entries include SEWER in association fee includes and none of the public remarks (0/20) mention 'sewer included' or similar language. With prior high confidence that sewer isn't described in remarks, the evidence supports that sewer is not generally included in maintenance fees.
Just 3 of 20 current MLS records list WATER as an association fee inclusion and none of the public remarks mention 'water included' (0/20). Given prior high confidence and lack of corroborating remarks, the evidence indicates water is not generally included in the HOA/maintenance fees.
BBQ facilities are mentioned across many listings, often in nearly identical language, suggesting a shared building/community amenity. Phrases like “BBQ areas,” “BBQ grills,” and “barbeque grills” appear repeatedly, so this is strong confirmation rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all provided public remarks, there are no references to any car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station, even when agents extensively list pools, parks, courts, and other amenities. Given that only a small minority of MLS entries mark car wash and there is zero textual support, it's very likely that the community does not offer a dedicated car wash facility. This is treated as a correction of likely MLS checkbox mistakes.
Although the MLS checkbox is relatively sparse, the remarks consistently point to a shared clubhouse-style facility: “community center,” “SoHo Community Center,” and “recreation center” appear in multiple listings. The repetition across agents makes this a solid building/community amenity.
No analysis available
Dog-park language appears throughout the remarks, often with the exact phrase “dog park” or “dog parks.” The consistency across many listings strongly confirms this is a community amenity buyers can rely on.
No analysis available
There is no remark-level evidence that Kaikea/Ho'opili has a shared exercise room or fitness center. With only 1 of 20 listings showing the MLS amenity, this appears to be either a copy/paste checkbox or a very weak signal rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Multiple listings state that Ho‘opili/SoHo provides 'rec rooms', 'party venues', and a pavilion associated with the recreation center. These enclosed, reservable spaces are effectively community or meeting rooms that residents can use for gatherings and events. Although labeled as rec/party rooms rather than 'meeting rooms', they satisfy the meeting-room amenity buyers would search for.
Evidence from the public remarks is strong: at least a dozen listings mention outdoor spaces such as "private lanai", "private balcony", "lanai flows seamlessly", and "huge covered lanai." MLS amenities also list PATDEC/COVPAT on 6 of 20 listings, and multiple agents describe lanais/balconies explicitly, indicating the building offers patio/deck/lanai-type amenities.
Direct evidence is limited, but at least one remark explicitly mentions “walking paths,” and others describe wide sidewalks and a walkable neighborhood. This is enough to support a jogging/walking-path style amenity at moderate confidence, though the language is less direct than for BBQ or dog parks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe shared amenity zones and recreation-oriented common spaces, including “recreation spaces,” “recreation center,” and “common areas with BBQ grills and places to gathering.” This is strong cross-listing evidence that the building/community offers a recreation area or similar amenity space.
Several listings describe community spaces in ways that map to recreation rooms, including the phrase “rec rooms” and references to party venues and gathering spaces. This is consistent across multiple remarks and not limited to a single agent description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently mentioned across listings: at least a dozen public remarks reference dedicated storage/lockers (quotes include “dedicated exterior storage labeled ‘021’”, “RARE DEEDED STORAGE (approx. 6x8...)”, and “private large ground-floor storage”). Historical data showed high confidence (≥8/20) and current remarks from multiple agents repeatedly mention storage rather than appearing to be a one-off checkbox error, so the building should be marked as offering storage units/lockers.
I looked for explicit surfboard storage or board storage facilities and did not find any. A garage being suitable for surfboards is not the same as a dedicated surfboard storage amenity, so this is not supported by the remarks.
I found no explicit mention of a tennis court in the remarks, despite the MLS checkbox appearing in some listings. The court references that do appear are for basketball and pickleball, which are not enough to confirm tennis facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across the listings that Ho‘opili/Kaikea offers a shared pool amenity. The remarks mention it in many listings—phrases like 'pool,' 'community swimming pool,' 'SoHo community pool,' and 'recreation center with Pool' appear repeatedly across multiple agents, suggesting reliable copy-paste of a real community feature rather than an unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater-specific pool language and found none. The listings mention community pools and resort-style pools, but they do not specify that the pool is saltwater.
Strong, consistent evidence that Kaikea at Ho‘opili units offer in-unit laundry. Multiple remarks across many listings explicitly say "full-size washer/dryer," "in-unit laundry," and "washer and dryer in the unit," with no contradictory remarks. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and matches the historical 20/20 MLS inclusion data.
No analysis available
I looked for signs of paid community laundry such as coin-op, card-operated, or quarters-only laundry and found nothing. The remarks consistently describe in-unit washer/dryer setups, so there is no evidence of paid shared laundry.
I searched the public remarks for references to community laundry on each floor and found none. The listings instead mention in-unit washers and dryers, which does not support shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: MLS data shows parking features in 20/20 listings, with remarks referencing “two parking stalls,” “one assigned parking stall,” “2-car garage,” and “uncovered parking stall.” Evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect building-level availability rather than a one-off unit feature.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 17 of 20 listings show assigned parking, and multiple agents describe it directly as “assigned parking stall,” “2 assigned parking stalls,” or “one assigned parking stall,” making this a reliable building feature.
There is consistent evidence that the building offers covered parking: at least several listings mention garages or covered stalls (quotes: "private, detached 1-car garage," "enclosed one-car garage," "two that are covered in the garage"). Coverage appears across multiple units and agent remarks, supporting inclusion of covered parking for the building.
I looked for explicit terms like 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed' and found none. The listings describe assigned stalls and garages, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking,' or 'parking rental,' but found no references. The remarks only discuss assigned/covered parking and guest parking.
Guest parking is supported by MLS data and repeated public remarks, though less consistently than assigned parking. About 11 of 20 listings show guest parking, and multiple listings mention “guest stalls,” “ample guest parking,” or “lots of street and guest parking,” indicating it is available in the building/community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking waitlist,' 'join the waitlist,' or 'parking waiting list' and found none. Nothing in the public remarks suggests a waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
There is strong evidence of electronic access control in the remarks, including fob access and keyless entry. These references support that the building has a card/fob-based security system.
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly describe security guard service; they only reference secured entry, fob access, call boxes, and video cameras. The current MLS data shows SECGUA in just 2/20 listings, which looks like sparse, possibly copy-pasted checkbox use rather than verified on-site guard service.
I searched for patrol-related language such as security patrol or roving security and found none. The building is described as secure, but the remarks do not indicate an on-site patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that Kaikea at Ho‘opili units offer split AC/mini-split systems. In the current remarks, split AC is explicitly mentioned in many listings—phrases like 'split AC,' 'split A/C units in every room,' and 'energy-efficient split A/C' appear repeatedly, suggesting this is a standard building feature rather than a one-off agent error. The historical MLS pattern (19 of 20 listings with ACSPL) aligns with the remarks and supports very high confidence.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 9 of 20 listings list CONCRE in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks reference 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete' or similar. There is no historical confidence or user verification and evidence appears to be agent checkbox data without supporting remarks, so concrete construction is not validated by remarks.
Double-wall construction appears to be a building-level feature for Kaikea at Ho'opili. Historical MLS data is strong at 17 of 20 listings, and nothing in the current public remarks suggests a change or correction. The repeated, consistent listing pattern makes this high confidence.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 2 of 20 listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, yet none of the public remarks use 'masonry', 'stucco', or 'masonry and stucco'. The evidence is limited to a small number of MLS checkbox entries without corroborating remarks, so masonry/stucco is not validated by remarks.
No analysis available
There is some MLS support for slab construction, with 8 of 20 listings marked SLAB, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe a concrete slab foundation. Because the remarks are silent and the confidence was previously low, this remains a weaker, MLS-driven signal rather than a well-verified feature.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 4 of 20 listings list WOOFRA in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks include terms like 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction'. With no supporting remarks or verifications, wood-frame construction is not confirmed by the public listing text.
CURRENT MLS: 7 of 20 listings list ABOGRO in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'above ground construction' or similar. Prior confidence was Low and there is no supporting remark or verification, so above-ground construction cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators like 'short-term rental allowed,' 'vacation rental allowed,' 'TVU,' 'NUC,' and similar permissions, but found no supporting language. Some listings mention rental potential or long-term investors, which does not establish that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program and found none. Since STR allowance is not established in the remarks, this must remain false.
I searched for wording such as 'mandatory pool,' 'must participate,' or 'cannot opt out' and found nothing. There is also no evidence of any hotel rental pool program in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' and renewal/extension dates, but found nothing. There is no public remark evidence to extract a lease expiry year.
Public remarks repeatedly reference VA financing across different listings, including VA assumable loans and VA-approved status. This is strong, direct evidence that the building/units are VA loan approved.
I looked for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, or fully covered insurance. The remarks do not contain any such language, so there is no evidence the building is fully insured by the HOA.
Fire sprinklers are supported by both MLS data and public remarks. One listing explicitly states "interior fire sprinklers," and current MLS data shows FIRSPR checked in 13/20 listings. The repeated presence across listings suggests this is a legitimate building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language, fire inspection language, and certification/compliance statements. Nothing was found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 10 listings explicitly mention mountain or mauka views — quotes include "Mauka views", "mountain views", and "views of the Makakilo Mountain range." Historical confidence was high and many independent remarks across different agents confirm mountain views, while some MLS view checkboxes show NONE (likely copy/paste), so evidence strongly indicates the building offers mountain views.
No analysis available
There is at least one listing that explicitly mentions 'city' as part of panoramic views ('ocean, mountain, city and Diamond Head'). MLS checkbox data does not currently show CITY, but the explicit remark indicates some units offer city views, so the feature is included for buyers searching for city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are clearly supported across multiple listings, not just a single agent's copy. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly mention 'sunset views' or similar language, including 'gorgeous views of the Makakilo Mountain range, Sunset' and 'gorgeous mauka and sunset views.' This strongly confirms that some units in the building offer sunset-facing views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as 'watch fireworks from the lanai' or 'see fireworks from unit' and found none. The remarks mention ocean, mountain, sunset, and Diamond Head views, but not fireworks visibility from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the provided remarks that the building has a resident manager on-site. The current MLS data shows RESMAN in only 4/20 listings, which is too weak to trust without any corroborating remarks. This looks more like occasional agent checkbox noise than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.