Kaikea at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaikea at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kaikea at Hoopili in Ewa (built 2022) with pool and sunset views.
About Kaikea at Hoopili
Kaikea at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2022. According to available records, specific unit sizes and construction details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. Units feature split air conditioning, and the property is noted for sunset views. The MLS indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as available with guest parking provided. The management company is not identified in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy clues such as a percentage, majority owner occupied wording, or community-level occupancy descriptions. No such language was found in any of the listings, so the owner-occupancy percentage cannot be determined from the remarks.
The remarks consistently confirm that Kaikea has an elevator. No explicit elevator count beyond one was provided in the listings, so the current value of 1 is retained.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence indicates the maintenance fee includes common area electricity. Current MLS data shows 15 of 20 listings with OTCOEX, while the remarks are mostly amenity descriptions and do not contradict it. Because this appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note, it should be treated as a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS listings include HOTWAT, while 17 of 20 list WTRHTR, which is a strong counter-signal for building-supplied hot water. No public remarks suggest a recent change, so this should remain false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 current MLS entries include SEWER in association fee includes and none of the public remarks (0/20) mention 'sewer included' or similar language. With prior high confidence that sewer isn't described in remarks, the evidence supports that sewer is not generally included in maintenance fees.
Just 3 of 20 current MLS records list WATER as an association fee inclusion and none of the public remarks mention 'water included' (0/20). Given prior high confidence and lack of corroborating remarks, the evidence indicates water is not generally included in the HOA/maintenance fees.
BBQ facilities are strongly and repeatedly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks mention 'grilling stations,' 'BBQ grills,' 'BBQ areas,' and 'barbeque grills,' which appears consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error. The current MLS pattern and public remarks align very closely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all provided public remarks, there are no references to any car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station, even when agents extensively list pools, parks, courts, and other amenities. Given that only a small minority of MLS entries mark car wash and there is zero textual support, it's very likely that the community does not offer a dedicated car wash facility. This is treated as a correction of likely MLS checkbox mistakes.
Although the MLS checkbox is relatively sparse, the remarks consistently point to a shared clubhouse-style facility: “community center,” “SoHo Community Center,” and “recreation center” appear in multiple listings. The repetition across agents makes this a solid building/community amenity.
No analysis available
Dog park access is one of the most consistently confirmed amenities in the dataset. Many remarks explicitly say 'dog park' or 'dog parks,' and several also reference 'pet park' or named dog-park areas, indicating this is a real shared community amenity. The evidence is overwhelming and consistent across listings.
No analysis available
There is no remark-level evidence that Kaikea/Ho'opili has a shared exercise room or fitness center. With only 1 of 20 listings showing the MLS amenity, this appears to be either a copy/paste checkbox or a very weak signal rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Multiple listings state that Ho‘opili/SoHo provides 'rec rooms', 'party venues', and a pavilion associated with the recreation center. These enclosed, reservable spaces are effectively community or meeting rooms that residents can use for gatherings and events. Although labeled as rec/party rooms rather than 'meeting rooms', they satisfy the meeting-room amenity buyers would search for.
Public remarks strongly support patio/deck amenities for this building. At least a dozen listings mention outdoor areas such as "covered lanai," "private lanai," "private balcony," "spacious lanai," and "large balcony," often describing them as a meaningful part of the unit. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history.
Path/jogging evidence is present but more indirect than the other features. Several remarks mention “walking paths,” “walk,” and walkable community access, which supports a shared path feature, but the language is less explicit about a dedicated jogging path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area language appears across many listings, with multiple agents referencing 'recreation center,' 'recreation spaces,' and 'party venues.' This is consistent with a shared amenity area rather than a unit-specific feature. The repeated references across listings support a strong true value.
Recreation room evidence is present but less frequent than BBQ or dog park. Several remarks explicitly use 'rec rooms,' 'recreation spaces,' and similar community gathering language, suggesting the building/community offers shared indoor amenity space. The evidence is moderate but consistent enough to keep true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently mentioned across listings: at least a dozen public remarks reference dedicated storage/lockers (quotes include “dedicated exterior storage labeled ‘021’”, “RARE DEEDED STORAGE (approx. 6x8...)”, and “private large ground-floor storage”). Historical data showed high confidence (≥8/20) and current remarks from multiple agents repeatedly mention storage rather than appearing to be a one-off checkbox error, so the building should be marked as offering storage units/lockers.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or similar dedicated facilities. One remark says a garage is suitable for surfboards, but that is not the same as an explicit building amenity, and another mentions bike storage only.
I found no explicit mention of a tennis court in the remarks, despite the MLS checkbox appearing in some listings. The court references that do appear are for basketball and pickleball, which are not enough to confirm tennis facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is very strongly supported across the listings: well over a dozen remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, often tied to the SoHo/Ho'opili community amenities. Phrases like 'community pool,' 'SoHo community center and pool,' and 'recreation center with pool' appear repeatedly across multiple agents, indicating this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a consistent building/community feature.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit saltwater-pool wording such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool." The listings mention a pool and community pool multiple times, but no remark identifies it as salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence shows Kaikea at Ho‘opili offers in-unit laundry. Across many listings, agents explicitly state phrases like 'full-size washer/dryer,' 'in-unit laundry,' 'washer and dryer in the unit,' and 'Whirlpool Smart Washer and Dryer,' which aligns with the historical MLS inclusion data (20/20 listings). The evidence is repeated by multiple listings and appears highly reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating coin-op, card-operated, quarters, laundry fees, or other paid community laundry terms. The remarks instead describe in-unit washer/dryer or laundry rooms, with no evidence of paid shared laundry.
I searched the public remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar community-laundry references. The listings mention in-unit laundry, laundry closets, and washer/dryer in-unit, but nothing indicates shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. MLS data shows parking features in 20/20 listings, and the remarks repeatedly reference “assigned parking,” “1-car garage,” “2 parking total,” “2 assigned parking stalls,” and “enclosed one-car garage.”
Assigned parking is very well supported. Across the remarks, many listings mention “one assigned parking stall,” “2 assigned parking stalls,” “a nearby assigned stall,” and “dedicated” or “deeded” parking, indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Covered parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. Several listings explicitly mention a garage or covered parking, such as “rare 1-car garage,” “detached 1-car garage,” and “two that are covered in the garage,” confirming that covered parking is available in the building.
I looked for public-remarks wording like 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The listings consistently describe assigned stalls and garages, which suggests parking is allocated rather than explicitly deeded, but there is no direct deeded-parking statement.
No analysis available
I searched for references to parking fees, monthly parking costs, or rental charges. The remarks discuss assigned parking, garages, and guest parking, but never mention any separate parking fee.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and listing remarks. Multiple listings call out “lots of guest parking,” “ample guest parking,” and “nearby guest stalls,” which appears repeatedly across different agents and unit types.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'parking waitlist,' 'parking waiting list,' or instructions to join a parking list. The listings mention assigned stalls and guest parking, but nothing about a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The listings strongly support card/fob-style access security. Public remarks repeatedly reference fob access, keyless entry, secured entry, call boxes, and secured elevator access, which is clear evidence of an electronic access system.
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly describe security guard service; they only reference secured entry, fob access, call boxes, and video cameras. The current MLS data shows SECGUA in just 2/20 listings, which looks like sparse, possibly copy-pasted checkbox use rather than verified on-site guard service.
I searched for terms like security patrol, roving security, patrolled building, or similar service language. The remarks mention secured entry, call boxes, cameras, and elevator access, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is very strongly supported for Kaikea at Ho'opili. Dozens of remarks from different listings explicitly mention "split AC," "split A/C," "split air conditioning," or "split AC units in every room," which aligns with the MLS inclusion data showing ACSPL on all current listings. This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 9 of 20 listings list CONCRE in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks reference 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete' or similar. There is no historical confidence or user verification and evidence appears to be agent checkbox data without supporting remarks, so concrete construction is not validated by remarks.
Double-wall construction appears to be a building-level characteristic for Kaikea at Ho'opili. Current MLS data is very consistent at 18 of 20 listings, and the remarks do not conflict with that established feature.
No analysis available
No listing remarks cite masonry or stucco construction, despite a small number of MLS checkboxes showing MASSTU. The evidence reads like inconsistent MLS data rather than a confirmed building feature.
There is no public-remarks support for steel frame construction across the listings provided. Even though 8 of 20 MLS entries currently carry STEFRA, the absence of any agent remarks describing steel-frame construction makes this unsupported for building-level verification.
There is some MLS support for slab construction, with 8 of 20 listings marked SLAB, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe a concrete slab foundation. Because the remarks are silent and the confidence was previously low, this remains a weaker, MLS-driven signal rather than a well-verified feature.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 4 of 20 listings list WOOFRA in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks include terms like 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction'. With no supporting remarks or verifications, wood-frame construction is not confirmed by the public listing text.
The public remarks do not confirm above-ground construction, even though 7 of 20 MLS records currently list ABOGRO. This appears unverified and likely reflects MLS checkbox inconsistency rather than a confirmed building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators like 'short-term rental allowed,' 'vacation rental allowed,' 'NUC,' 'TVU,' or similar terms. The remarks do not provide any clear permission for STRs, and the rental-related wording points more toward standard long-term use.
I looked for hotel-rental-pool references like Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style programs or hotel-managed operations. There is no evidence of any hotel pool participation in the remarks, and STR is not supported either.
I searched for terms like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no rental-pool language at all, so there is no basis for a mandatory program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' and any 4-digit expiry year. Nothing in the listings indicates this is a leasehold property or provides a lease expiration date.
The public remarks repeatedly reference VA financing and assumable VA loans at different rates. This is strong, direct evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language indicating walls-in coverage or full building insurance. Nothing in the listings confirms that the HOA is fully insured. Based on the available remarks, this remains unverified and is treated as absent.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported. At least one remark explicitly says "interior fire sprinklers," and the current MLS data shows 13/20 listings with FIRSPR, which is consistent with a real building feature rather than a copy-paste artifact.
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. The only related text found was a mention of interior fire sprinklers, which does not confirm an FLSE pass. Based on the remarks, this feature is not verified.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listing history and current remarks. At least 10 of 20 current listings reference mountain/mauka views in MLS data, and multiple agents explicitly describe them in the remarks, including phrases like 'beautiful mountain views,' 'Mauka views,' and 'stunning views of the Makakilo Mountain range.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
There is at least one listing that explicitly mentions 'city' as part of panoramic views ('ocean, mountain, city and Diamond Head'). MLS checkbox data does not currently show CITY, but the explicit remark indicates some units offer city views, so the feature is included for buyers searching for city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by several independent listing remarks, not just one agent’s copy. At least 4 listings explicitly mention sunset views or sunset-facing views, with phrases like "gorgeous mauka and sunset views" and "gorgeous views of the Makakilo Mountain range, Sunset." Even though current MLS view_descriptions show no SUNSET entries and many NONE entries, the repeated remarks provide strong evidence that some units in the building do offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that units or lanais have views of Friday night fireworks. The remarks mention mountain, ocean, city, Diamond Head, sunset, and other scenic views, but nothing about fireworks visibility from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager appears in a minority of current MLS listings (5/20), but none of the public remarks mention a resident manager, live-in manager, or building manager on property. That makes the current evidence weak and suggests the checkbox may be inconsistently used, so this is only a tentative include based on historical confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.