Kaholo Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaholo Hale
Building Overview
Kaholo Hale in Mililani-Waipio — built 1974; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About Kaholo Hale
Kaholo Hale is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and, according to available records, was built in 1974. MLS data provided does not specify the building’s total size, number of units, or construction type.
Key policies indicated in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No additional building amenities or features (such as a pool, laundry facilities, or common areas) are listed in the available MLS records.
The MLS listing shows the management company as unknown and does not include information about parking, maintenance fees, or other assessments. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify building size, construction details, amenity availability, management, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
None of the listings give any percentage or qualitative description of owner-occupancy in the Kaholo Hale complex (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied'). Because no explicit data is provided, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown rather than estimated.
None of the public remarks for these Kaholo Hale townhomes reference any elevators in the complex. Because numeric values cannot be guessed without explicit statements, the number of elevators is left unknown rather than assumed to be zero.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the association fee. Current MLS data shows 15/20 listings with OTCOEX, and the public remarks do not contradict this. The signal is fairly strong but appears to come mainly from repeated MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS listings show HOTWAT, many list WTRHTR, and one remark explicitly mentions a "water heater," which is a strong indicator that the building is not supplying hot water through the HOA fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the association fee. Current MLS data shows 17/20 listings with SEWER, and the public remarks do not provide any contrary evidence. This is strong building-level evidence and appears consistent across multiple listings.
Water is very likely included in the maintenance/association fee. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with WATER, which is a very strong building-level pattern. The remarks are silent on the issue, but the MLS consistency is overwhelming.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the current remarks supports patio/deck amenities. Many listings mention outdoor spaces by name—'half covered back lanai,' 'front patio,' 'private enclosed courtyard/lanai,' 'private lanai,' and 'enclosed patio/lanai'—showing this is a common building feature rather than a one-off. The language appears across multiple listings/agents, reinforcing the high-confidence MLS history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly confirm private yard access or fenced yard space, with several listings describing 'private yard,' 'large fenced side yard,' 'large enclosed front yard,' and 'fenced front and back yards.' This is repeated across different remarks and agents, suggesting the feature is genuinely present in the building and not just copied MLS boilerplate. The evidence strongly supports keeping private_yard enabled.
No analysis available
The building/community appears to offer a recreation area via the Mililani Town Association amenity network. At least several listings mention recreation centers, and one explicitly says "Rec Center 2 with heated lap pool and rec area." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is well supported across the listings, with many remarks describing 'extra space,' 'extra storage space,' or an 'exterior storage closet.' Historical MLS data also shows strong support, with 6/20 listings marking storage in amenities and 14/20 in unit features. This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The remarks reference various types of storage such as carport storage, lanai storage, and an exterior storage closet, but none are identified as surfboard-specific. I searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and combined bike/surfboard storage and found no matches. Based on the absence of any explicit mention, surfboard storage is assumed not to be a dedicated building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks mention MTA amenities with "pools," including specific references to "6 pools," a "community pool," and "Rec Center 2 with heated lap pool." The evidence appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
All remarks were checked for any indication that the pool is salt water, including phrases like saltwater, saline, or salt pool. Only standard and heated community pools are mentioned, with no reference to salt water, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention it across many agents, including "nearby laundry area," "separate laundry room," and direct appliance mentions like "washer/dryer" or "washer, dryer." This appears consistent rather than a copy-paste anomaly, and it aligns with the current MLS inclusions showing washer/dryer in 19 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
I looked for indications of paid laundry such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'laundry fee', or needing quarters, and none appeared in any of the remarks. Since laundry is consistently described as inside the units, the community likely does not have a paid shared laundry system.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or any reference to shared/common laundry areas and found none. All mentions of laundry are in-unit, so the building likely does not have community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention phrases like “1 car carport and an additional uncovered parking stall,” “two assigned parking stalls,” “one covered stall and one open stall,” and “one open parking space.” The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be legitimate, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported. At least several listings explicitly say the unit includes “two assigned parking stalls” or “two reserved parking stalls directly in front of the unit,” which is strong building-level evidence. The repeated wording across listings suggests this is a real and commonly advertised feature.
Covered parking is strongly established for this building. Listings frequently describe a “1 car carport,” “covered 1 car carport,” or “one covered stall,” indicating covered parking is available to buyers. This is supported by both MLS data and multiple public remarks across listings.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stalls, or parking included in deed and found none. The listings only mention assigned/reserved stalls and carport parking, which is not enough to call parking deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charges or rental costs and found nothing. The remarks mention parking stalls but do not indicate any separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building. While it is mentioned less often than standard parking, one listing explicitly notes “nearby guest parking,” and the MLS data supports this in a majority of listings. The evidence is good enough to include, though slightly less direct than the other parking features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found none. The listings instead describe available assigned or reserved stalls.
No analysis available
The public remarks describe unit upgrades, parking, yards, and nearby recreation centers but do not reference any key card, fob, or electronic access system for the building or complex. Searched for terms like 'key card access', 'fob entry', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' with no results, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
Across all supplied listings, there is no indication of a security patrol service for the building or complex. Looked for phrases such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrolled building' but none were mentioned, so this feature is assumed absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are 2 distinct remarks explicitly describing split AC/mini-split systems, and current MLS inclusions show ACSPL in 4 of 19 listings. Evidence is positive but limited, so this reads as a feature present in some units rather than uniformly across the building.
Window AC is well supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, at least 2 listings explicitly describe window A/C, while the MLS checkbox appears in 15 of 20 current listings, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, so buyers should consider window AC available here.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls." The evidence remains negative across many agent remarks, so the building does not appear to have reliable support for this feature in the public descriptions.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0/0 listings) mention masonry or stucco; although 4 of 17 current MLS records have MASSTU checked, the marketing copy across many agents never references 'masonry' or 'stucco', implying the checkbox may be copy/paste error. Because there is no supporting descriptive evidence from listings or owner verification, we omit this feature for now.
No analysis available
Concrete slab construction is shown in 10 of 19 current listings, so the feature appears present in the building record but with less consistency than wood frame. The remarks do not mention the foundation type, suggesting this comes from MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent verification.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in the current MLS data for 11 of 19 listings, giving moderate evidence that Kaholo Hale is a wood-frame building. None of the public remarks explicitly mention the construction type, so this is inferred mainly from the recurring MLS material field rather than agent narrative.
There are no public-remark mentions of above-ground construction, above-ground building, or above-ground materials across the listings provided. Because the feature appears in only 1 of 20 MLS records and is not supported by the remarks, confidence is high that it should not be treated as a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, vacation rental allowed, or minimum-stay rules and found none. Based on the absence of any supportive language in the public remarks, STR appears not to be allowed here.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as branded hotel programs, managed rental pools, or hotel-operated unit programs and found none. Since the remarks do not support STR in the first place, hotel pool participation must be false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel pool or mandatory rental program, such as must participate or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, or renewal/extension terms and found none. There is no public remark evidence to extract a specific expiration year.
The public remarks repeatedly support VA financing eligibility. The strongest direct evidence is the explicit phrase "VA approved complex," reinforced by several mentions of VA assumable loans.
The remarks do not describe the HOA as providing full or walls-in building insurance coverage. In the absence of any such language across multiple listings, this feature is assumed not to be provided, though this is not directly disproven in the text.
No analysis available
The listings do not indicate that the building has passed any fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification. Given the complete absence of such references, this is treated as not present, though this is based only on lack of mention, not on contrary evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence that this building offers garden or courtyard views in some units. 3 of 20 current MLS listings explicitly include GARDEN in the view field, and several remarks mention "courtyard/lanai," "plants and herbs," and other green outdoor areas. The pattern suggests this is a real but not universal building feature rather than a copy-paste claim across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks mention sunset views; instead, the remarks focus on mountain views, natural light, breezes, yards, and amenities. The MLS view fields also show 0/18 listings tagged SUNSET and 11/18 explicitly marked NONE, which strongly supports that this building does not offer sunset views as a feature buyers can rely on.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for terms like fireworks, "watch fireworks from lanai," or similar view descriptions and found none. Given the detailed marketing language used and the inland Mililani location, it is unlikely the building is promoted for fireworks views. Therefore, fireworks_view is set to false in the absence of any supporting evidence.
No analysis available
Resident manager is only weakly supported: 3/19 listings have the RESMAN amenity checked, but the remarks across the sampled listings do not mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. Because the evidence is limited to MLS checkbox data and appears unconfirmed in remarks, confidence is below moderate and should be revisited if future listings explicitly describe on-site management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.