Kahe Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahe Kai
Building Overview
Kahe Kai in Nanakuli-Maili — built 1975; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed, per MLS data.
About Kahe Kai
Kahe Kai is located in the Nanakuli-Maili neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available MLS records, specific details such as building size, unit mix, and construction type are not provided in the listing data.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list on-site amenities or common-area features for this building. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking availability, maintenance fees, homeowner association rules, and utility arrangements — are not specified in the MLS information provided. Buyers should verify all material facts with the listing agent, property manager, or official documents before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for direct owner-occupancy references such as percentages, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none appeared in the listings. The remarks discuss investor and first-time buyer appeal, tenant occupancy, and rentals, but they do not quantify or clearly describe the owner-occupied share.
Strong direct evidence indicates there are no elevators in the building. Multiple remarks use walk-up language and one explicitly states there are no elevators, so the current value is well supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears in 16 of 20 current MLS records via OTCOEX, but the public remarks are silent on this item. Because the remarks repeatedly discuss other fee inclusions and amenities without mentioning common electric, this is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas is strongly confirmed at the building level. Across many listings, remarks repeatedly state the maintenance fee includes gas, and the current MLS data also shows gas in 15/20 records. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than an agent copy/paste anomaly.
Hot water is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks and supported by current MLS data. Multiple listings use the exact phrase that the maintenance fee includes hot water, and one record also notes 'central hot water,' which reinforces the feature. Evidence is strong across several agents and not limited to a single listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is effectively confirmed at the building level. The current MLS data shows sewer included in 19 of 20 listings, and many public remarks repeat that the maintenance fee includes sewer. This is very strong, repeated evidence across the listing set.
Water is consistently confirmed across the listing set. Current MLS data shows water included in 19 of 20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly say the maintenance fee includes water. The evidence is highly consistent and clearly building-level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is supported by many current listings for this building. At least 4+ remarks explicitly mention a 'recreation area,' 'rec area,' or access to a 'park and rec area,' often alongside playground references. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and looks like a real shared amenity, not a one-off MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage or related amenity descriptions such as board storage or surf storage. The remarks mention nearby surfing and beaches, but not any dedicated surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a pool, especially saltwater/saline wording. There were no pool references in the public remarks, so there is no evidence for a saltwater pool.
In-unit laundry appears in only 1 of 20 current MLS listings and is not corroborated by the public remarks. Most remarks instead say “community coin laundry on site,” “shared laundry room,” or “laundry facilities,” suggesting the in-unit checkbox may be a one-off or copy/paste entry. Confidence is limited because the evidence is sparse and not consistently described by agents.
Community laundry is strongly confirmed for this building. Roughly 10+ current public remarks explicitly mention it with phrases like 'community laundry onsite,' 'community coin laundry on site,' 'shared laundry room,' and 'laundry facilities,' aligning with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data (15/20 listings). This appears to be a real shared building feature, consistently referenced across multiple listings rather than simple copy-paste noise.
I searched for coin-op, card-operated, quarter-operated, or fee-based laundry language. The remarks clearly state the laundry is paid, so this feature is strongly supported.
I looked for wording like laundry on each floor, every level, or floor-by-floor laundry. The public remarks only confirm a shared/community laundry facility onsite or near the unit, which points to a common laundry area rather than laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. The current remarks mention parking in many listings, including phrases like "one assigned parking stall," "2 parking stalls," "1 open parking," and "parking in front of unit." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well documented in the building. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall," "2 assigned parking stalls," "TWO RESERVED parking stalls," and "designated parking stall," showing consistent evidence across many listings. The pattern is broad and repeated, not isolated to a single listing.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included with the deed and found none. The remarks consistently describe assigned/reserved parking stalls instead.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, and parking rental, but found none. The listings repeatedly mention assigned parking stalls, which suggests parking is included rather than separately priced in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join the list for parking, but found nothing. The public remarks only discuss assigned stalls and parking passes, with no indication that residents must wait for parking.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access terms such as keycard entry, fob access, or card reader systems. The remarks do not mention any card-based security access, so this feature is unsupported.
No analysis available
I searched for security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building language. The public remarks directly describe scheduled security shifts and dedicated night security, which is strong evidence of security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is clearly supported for this building. At least 3 listings mention it directly, including phrases like "2 window AC's," "window A/C units in every room," and another listing describing "A/C units in the living room and both bedrooms." The evidence is explicit and repeated across multiple remarks, so this is high confidence rather than copy-paste noise.
Concrete construction remains the strongest-supported structural feature for this building. MLS checkbox data is consistent enough across recent listings (12 of 20) to treat it as true, even though the public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete.
Double-wall construction appears in a majority of the recent MLS records (11 of 20). The public remarks do not mention it, so this looks like an MLS-level building characteristic rather than something agents describe in marketing copy.
No analysis available
Although one MLS listing is flagged MASSTU, none of the public remarks across the collected listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The remarks consistently omit structural material details while focusing on renovations, parking, and location—suggesting the MASSTU checkbox is uncorroborated and likely an agent entry rather than verified building information.
MLS has 5/20 listings flagged STEFRA, yet the provided public remarks (dozens of listings) contain no mention of 'steel frame' or steel construction. Agent remarks consistently discuss unit updates, views, parking, and amenities but not structural materials, indicating the steel-frame checkbox is uncorroborated and likely a copy/paste entry.
Slab foundation is weakly supported at best, with only 3 of 20 MLS listings checked and no remark-level confirmation anywhere in the provided descriptions. This looks more like occasional MLS marking noise than a clearly documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction has partial support from MLS data only, with 7 of 20 listings marked ABOGRO. None of the public remarks explicitly reference above-ground materials or construction, so confidence stays moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental signals such as vacation rental, STR permitted, legal short-term rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language, and found none. One listing explicitly says the unit is "Approved as a long-term rental," which strongly points away from short-term rental allowance.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, managed-by-hotel language, or similar programs and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of STR being allowed, this is also forced false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out and found none. There is no hotel-pool evidence in the remarks, so mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as leasehold, with several expiry references including 2034 and a later remark saying the lease is good through 2048. Using the latest/extended date, the lease expiry year is 2048.
Multiple listings directly confirm VA loan eligibility, including explicit "VA approved" language. This is consistent across the remarks, so confidence is very high.
The listings directly state the building is 100% insured for replacement value, which is strong evidence of full building insurance / walls-in style coverage. This is consistent across the relevant remarks and supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language and found none. The listings mention resident manager, security, VA/FHA/USDA approval, and maintenance items, but nothing that confirms a passed FLSE or equivalent fire/life safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention them, including quotes such as "***OCEAN VIEW!***," "Top-Floor Condo with Ocean Views," "Nice Ocean Views from the living and primary bedroom," and "ocean view in the living room." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste claim.
Multiple listings explicitly mention mountain views, not just one agent remark: examples include "gorgeous mountain view," "views of the Waianae mountain range," "mountain views," and "a mountain view in the bedrooms." In several cases the mountain-view language appears alongside ocean-view descriptions, suggesting these are legitimate unit-level view differences rather than copy-paste noise. Despite some current MLS entries showing NONE, the repeated remarks across different listings support view_mountain = true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although MLS view_descriptions contain no GARDEN entries (0/20), at least two listings' public remarks explicitly reference landscaped/garden views: 'Curated landscaping just outside the living room window' and 'garden setting as your view.' Evidence is limited to a few listings (likely unit-specific) rather than widespread across agents, so inclusion is warranted but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence that the building offers sunset views: 2 of 20 current listings explicitly list SUNSET in view_descriptions and at least two public remarks state phrases like 'enjoy... beautiful sunsets.' Many other remarks note ocean views or west-side location, but the mentions are limited and may reflect selective units or agent copy/paste rather than building-wide confirmation.
No analysis available
I looked for any references to seeing fireworks from the building or from unit lanais/windows. The remarks discuss ocean, mountain, beach, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a resident manager on-site. At least 2 current public remarks explicitly say "resident manager," and another mentions a "property manager," while the MLS amenity checkbox is set in 11 of 20 current listings. The repeated presence across multiple listings suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.