Kahe Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahe Kai
Building Overview
Kahe Kai in Nanakuli-Maili — built 1975; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed, per MLS data.
About Kahe Kai
Kahe Kai is located in the Nanakuli-Maili neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available MLS records, specific details such as building size, unit mix, and construction type are not provided in the listing data.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list on-site amenities or common-area features for this building. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking availability, maintenance fees, homeowner association rules, and utility arrangements — are not specified in the MLS information provided. Buyers should verify all material facts with the listing agent, property manager, or official documents before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for numeric owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No owner-occupancy information was provided, so the percentage remains unknown.
The remarks directly deny the presence of elevators and also describe the complex as a third-floor or top-floor walk-up. This strongly confirms the current value of zero elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fourteen of 20 current MLS records identify OTCOEX, indicating that common-area electricity is generally included in the maintenance fee. No public remarks explicitly say “common area electricity” or “common electric,” so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and remains less certain than the sewer and water features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas is strongly confirmed at the building level. Across many listings, remarks repeatedly state the maintenance fee includes gas, and the current MLS data also shows gas in 15/20 records. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than an agent copy/paste anomaly.
Hot water is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks and supported by current MLS data. Multiple listings use the exact phrase that the maintenance fee includes hot water, and one record also notes 'central hot water,' which reinforces the feature. Evidence is strong across several agents and not limited to a single listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least five listings explicitly state “maintenance fee includes gas, hot water, sewer and water,” while the current MLS data shows SEWER in 18 of 20 records. The repeated wording across multiple listings and strong MLS consistency provide high-confidence building-level confirmation.
At least five listings explicitly state “maintenance fee includes gas, hot water, sewer and water” or equivalent wording, and WATER appears in 18 of 20 current MLS records. The agreement between repeated public remarks and the MLS data strongly confirms that water is included.
0 listings mention BBQ or grilling facilities in their remarks. With only 1/20 listings checking the MLS amenity and no supporting descriptions from multiple agents, there is no reliable evidence that Kahe Kai offers this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is supported by many current listings for this building. At least 4+ remarks explicitly mention a 'recreation area,' 'rec area,' or access to a 'park and rec area,' often alongside playground references. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and looks like a real shared amenity, not a one-off MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage. Although the remarks frequently discuss nearby beaches and surfing, no building storage facility for surfboards is identified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for pool, saltwater pool, salt water pool, saline pool, and salt pool references. Nothing was found, and the current building context lists no pool, so there is no evidence of a salt-water pool.
In-unit laundry appears in only 1 of 20 current MLS listings and is not corroborated by the public remarks. Most remarks instead say “community coin laundry on site,” “shared laundry room,” or “laundry facilities,” suggesting the in-unit checkbox may be a one-off or copy/paste entry. Confidence is limited because the evidence is sparse and not consistently described by agents.
At least 15 listings explicitly mention shared laundry or a laundry facility, with phrases such as “community laundry onsite,” “community coin laundry on site,” “shared laundry facilities,” and “laundry facilities are conveniently located near the unit.” The evidence is strong across multiple listing descriptions and includes specific operational details, so this is not merely unsupported checkbox copy-paste.
The remarks explicitly confirm that the community laundry is paid. Coin-operated equipment and specific wash/dryer charges are directly described.
I searched for wording such as laundry on each floor, every floor, every level, or floor-by-floor laundry. The remarks confirm shared or community laundry facilities in the complex, but there is no explicit evidence that facilities are located on every floor.
Parking is explicitly mentioned in well over 20 listings, with phrases such as "1 open, assigned parking," "two parking stalls," "parking in front of unit," and "ample parking." The evidence is strong across numerous listings and agents, confirming that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is explicitly mentioned in well over 15 listings, including "1 assigned parking stall," "TWO RESERVED parking stalls," "two separate assigned parking stalls," and "one designated parking stall." The repeated confirmation across multiple listing periods and agents, together with 17/20 ASSIGN MLS entries, strongly supports assigned parking as a building feature.
No analysis available
The remarks confirm that units receive assigned or reserved parking stalls, but they do not describe those stalls as deeded. Because deeded parking language is absent and the available descriptions indicate assigned parking, this is treated as false.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly mention assigned, reserved, and open parking stalls, as well as parking passes, but do not state a monthly parking cost. The parking fee is therefore unknown based on public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned, reserved, tandem, and open parking stalls and reference a required parking pass. No evidence of a building parking waitlist system was found.
No analysis available
I searched for key-card entry, fob access, card readers, electronic access, and keycard entry. The remarks describe security personnel or security shifts, but do not identify a card-based building access system.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly describe scheduled security coverage every day and dedicated night security. This supports the presence of a security patrol or security service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is clearly supported for this building. At least 3 listings mention it directly, including phrases like "2 window AC's," "window A/C units in every room," and another listing describing "A/C units in the living room and both bedrooms." The evidence is explicit and repeated across multiple remarks, so this is high confidence rather than copy-paste noise.
Concrete construction remains the strongest-supported structural feature for this building. MLS checkbox data is consistent enough across recent listings (12 of 20) to treat it as true, even though the public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete.
None of the provided public remarks mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls." However, DOUWAL appears in 10 of 20 current listings and was previously observed in 11 of 20 records, providing moderate, repeated MLS support despite the lack of textual confirmation.
No analysis available
Although one MLS listing is flagged MASSTU, none of the public remarks across the collected listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The remarks consistently omit structural material details while focusing on renovations, parking, and location—suggesting the MASSTU checkbox is uncorroborated and likely an agent entry rather than verified building information.
MLS has 5/20 listings flagged STEFRA, yet the provided public remarks (dozens of listings) contain no mention of 'steel frame' or steel construction. Agent remarks consistently discuss unit updates, views, parking, and amenities but not structural materials, indicating the steel-frame checkbox is uncorroborated and likely a copy/paste entry.
No public remarks mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation across the provided listings. Slab appears in only 4 of 20 current MLS records, a limited checkbox signal consistent with possible agent copy/paste rather than verified building-level evidence.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks mention "wood frame" or "wood frame construction." Although 5 of 20 MLS records include WOOFRA, this appears to be limited checkbox data without corroboration from listing descriptions, so the feature is not included.
Above-ground construction has partial support from MLS data only, with 7 of 20 listings marked ABOGRO. None of the public remarks explicitly reference above-ground materials or construction, so confidence stays moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks provide no affirmative evidence that short-term rentals are allowed. Rental references consistently concern investors, rental potential, tenants, or long-term rentals, so STR permission is treated as false.
The remarks contain no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature must also be false.
There is no public-remarks evidence of any hotel pool, much less mandatory participation. Since short-term rental permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as leasehold. Although older remarks mention 2034, the most recent specific extension/reference states the lease is good through 2048, so the latest stated expiry year is used.
The building is repeatedly identified as VA approved across multiple listings. This is direct and consistent public-remarks evidence supporting VA financing eligibility.
The remarks explicitly state that Kahe Kai is 100% insured for replacement value. This is strong evidence that the building has comprehensive or fully covered HOA insurance.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. None of these statements appeared, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention them, including quotes such as "***OCEAN VIEW!***," "Top-Floor Condo with Ocean Views," "Nice Ocean Views from the living and primary bedroom," and "ocean view in the living room." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste claim.
Multiple listings explicitly mention mountain views, not just one agent remark: examples include "gorgeous mountain view," "views of the Waianae mountain range," "mountain views," and "a mountain view in the bedrooms." In several cases the mountain-view language appears alongside ocean-view descriptions, suggesting these are legitimate unit-level view differences rather than copy-paste noise. Despite some current MLS entries showing NONE, the repeated remarks across different listings support view_mountain = true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention ocean or coastal views, including ocean views from living rooms, bedrooms, and top-floor units; at least 10 remarks contain clear view language. The evidence is repeated across different listings and is not merely inferred from proximity to the beach, so the building should be marked as offering coastline-view units despite inconsistent MLS checkbox data.
Although MLS view_descriptions contain no GARDEN entries (0/20), at least two listings' public remarks explicitly reference landscaped/garden views: 'Curated landscaping just outside the living room window' and 'garden setting as your view.' Evidence is limited to a few listings (likely unit-specific) rather than widespread across agents, so inclusion is warranted but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 current remarks explicitly mention sunsets, including “beautiful sunsets” and “West Side sunsets,” and several additional listings describe ocean views or west-side coastal exposure. Evidence is not uniform across the building and MLS entries are inconsistent, but the repeated sunset references support that some units offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for fireworks views from units, lanais, windows, or the building. No qualifying fireworks-view language was found; references to coastal views do not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least three current listings explicitly mention a "Resident Manager" or "resident manager," and another describes a property manager serving the community. This aligns with the strong historical MLS evidence, where 11 of 20 listings include RESMAN, indicating the building has on-site management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.