Kahe Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahe Kai
Building Overview
Kahe Kai in Nanakuli-Maili — built 1975; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed, per MLS data.
About Kahe Kai
Kahe Kai is located in the Nanakuli-Maili neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available MLS records, specific details such as building size, unit mix, and construction type are not provided in the listing data.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list on-site amenities or common-area features for this building. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking availability, maintenance fees, homeowner association rules, and utility arrangements — are not specified in the MLS information provided. Buyers should verify all material facts with the listing agent, property manager, or official documents before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy references such as percentages (e.g., 80% owner occupied) or qualitative descriptions like majority or highly owner occupied. No such language appears in the remarks, so the percentage cannot be reliably inferred from the provided text.
Multiple remarks describe Kahe Kai as a walk-up building and explicitly state there are no elevators. This is strong direct evidence, so the building is treated as having 0 elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears in 16 of 20 current MLS records via OTCOEX, but the public remarks are silent on this item. Because the remarks repeatedly discuss other fee inclusions and amenities without mentioning common electric, this is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas is one of the strongest-confirmed features here: 15 of 20 current MLS records include GAS, and many public remarks explicitly say 'maintenance fee includes gas' or 'low maintenance fees include gas.' The wording repeats across multiple listings and agents, so this looks consistent rather than copy-paste error.
Hot water is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, especially in phrases like 'maintenance fee includes gas, hot water, sewer and water' appearing across multiple listings. Although only 11 of 20 MLS records currently list HOTWAT, the explicit remarks make this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is effectively confirmed at the building level. Current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings with SEWER, and multiple public remarks explicitly list sewer among the included maintenance fees, making this highly reliable.
Water is consistently confirmed across the listing set. Current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings include WATER, and many remarks explicitly repeat that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, and similar amenity descriptions. The remarks mention surfing nearby, but they do not describe any surfboard storage facility in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a pool, especially a saltwater or saline pool. The remarks do not reference a pool at all, so there is no evidence for a salt water pool.
In-unit laundry appears in only 1 of 20 current MLS listings and is not corroborated by the public remarks. Most remarks instead say “community coin laundry on site,” “shared laundry room,” or “laundry facilities,” suggesting the in-unit checkbox may be a one-off or copy/paste entry. Confidence is limited because the evidence is sparse and not consistently described by agents.
Community/shared laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Roughly 15 of 20 current listings include the amenity, and multiple agent remarks independently describe it as “community coin laundry on site,” “shared laundry room,” “laundry facilities,” and similar phrasing. The repeated, specific references make this a clear building amenity rather than a copied checkbox.
The remarks clearly state that the laundry is coin-operated and give the wash/dryer cost. That is strong evidence that community laundry requires payment.
I looked for language such as laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry on every level. The remarks only confirm shared/community laundry on site, so there is no evidence for laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Well over a dozen listings mention parking, often specifying "2 assigned parking stalls," "reserved parking stalls," or a designated stall, while only a few use more general language like "ample parking" or "open parking." The evidence is consistent across many agents and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well documented in the public remarks. At least 15-20 listings explicitly mention assigned, reserved, or designated stalls, including multiple notes about two assigned stalls and tandem assigned stalls. This is strong cross-listing confirmation rather than agent checkbox noise.
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed and found none. The listings consistently describe the parking as assigned or reserved instead, which does not indicate deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to parking rent, monthly parking charges, or added parking cost and found nothing. The remarks only describe parking stalls and access/passes, not a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or parking waiting list and found none. The listings consistently indicate assigned or reserved stalls are included, which suggests no waitlist is being advertised.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms like keycard entry, fob access, or electronic access systems. The remarks do not mention any card-based security, so this feature is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks directly describe scheduled security shifts and dedicated night security service. That is strong evidence that the building has security patrol or similar ongoing security coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is explicit evidence that some units in this building have window air conditioning: at least 2 listings mention it directly, including phrases like "window A/C units in every room" and "Air conditioning in the living room and both bedrooms." This is strong enough to include as a building-level feature, though it appears only in a minority of listings and may not be universal across all units.
The building should still be treated as concrete construction. While the public remarks do not mention construction materials, the MLS data remains supportive with 12 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE, consistent with the prior high-confidence history. This looks more like routine copy/paste variance in remarks than a real change in the building.
Current MLS shows 14/20 listings with DOUWAL checked, but across the numerous public remarks provided there are zero mentions of 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction'. With no historical verification and consistent silence in agent remarks, the DOUWAL checkbox appears to be a likely copy/paste error and the building is reported as not having double-wall construction.
No analysis available
Although one MLS listing is flagged MASSTU, none of the public remarks across the collected listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The remarks consistently omit structural material details while focusing on renovations, parking, and location—suggesting the MASSTU checkbox is uncorroborated and likely an agent entry rather than verified building information.
MLS has 5/20 listings flagged STEFRA, yet the provided public remarks (dozens of listings) contain no mention of 'steel frame' or steel construction. Agent remarks consistently discuss unit updates, views, parking, and amenities but not structural materials, indicating the steel-frame checkbox is uncorroborated and likely a copy/paste entry.
No public remarks (0 of ~40 combined remarks) mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'. The MLS shows SLAB checked in 2 of 20 listings but the feature is otherwise absent from agent remarks, suggesting possible checkbox copy/paste; insufficient corroborating evidence to mark the building as slab-founded with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nine of 20 recent MLS listings list 'ABOGRO' in construction materials, suggesting some agents marked the building as above-ground construction. However, none of the public remarks across the listings explicitly state 'above ground' or describe above-ground materials; evidence is inconsistent across agents and may reflect copy/paste rather than uniform confirmation. Confidence is moderate (0.70) based on the MLS checkbox presence but lack of corroborating descriptive remarks or owner/site verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental signals such as STR permitted, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style stays and found none. The only rental-related language points to long-term rentals, so the building should be treated as not allowing STR based on these remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel program, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool, this remains false.
I searched for language indicating a required rental program or mandatory pool participation and found none. There is also no hotel-pool evidence at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly identify the building as leasehold with an expiry year of 2034. A few newer listings mention different remaining-lease phrasing (for example, about 7 or 10 years remaining), but the explicit year 2034 is the most reliable and repeated date to use.
The public remarks directly confirm VA loan eligibility. This appears consistently across multiple listings, so confidence is very high.
The remarks explicitly state the building is "100% insured for replacement value," which aligns with fully insured walls-in/comprehensive coverage. This is direct evidence, so the feature is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the provided remarks confirms this feature, so it remains unverified and is set to false with low confidence per the no-mention rule.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Approximately 18–22 listings' remarks reference ocean or ocean views (quotes include "***OCEAN VIEW!***", "Top-Floor Condo with Ocean Views", "ocean view from the living room", "walk across to sandy beaches"). Evidence is strong and repeated across many agent remarks, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.
Multiple listings explicitly mention mountain views, not just one agent remark: examples include "gorgeous mountain view," "views of the Waianae mountain range," "mountain views," and "a mountain view in the bedrooms." In several cases the mountain-view language appears alongside ocean-view descriptions, suggesting these are legitimate unit-level view differences rather than copy-paste noise. Despite some current MLS entries showing NONE, the repeated remarks across different listings support view_mountain = true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although MLS view_descriptions contain no GARDEN entries (0/20), at least two listings' public remarks explicitly reference landscaped/garden views: 'Curated landscaping just outside the living room window' and 'garden setting as your view.' Evidence is limited to a few listings (likely unit-specific) rather than widespread across agents, so inclusion is warranted but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence that the building offers sunset views: 2 of 20 current listings explicitly list SUNSET in view_descriptions and at least two public remarks state phrases like 'enjoy... beautiful sunsets.' Many other remarks note ocean views or west-side location, but the mentions are limited and may reflect selective units or agent copy/paste rather than building-wide confirmation.
No analysis available
I searched for references to fireworks views from lanais, bedrooms, or other unit vantage points. The remarks discuss ocean, mountain, beach, and sunset views, but nothing indicates fireworks can be seen from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong: the MLS RESMAN checkbox appears set on roughly 12 of 20 current listings and at least 4 separate public remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager (e.g., "Resident Manager" and "a resident manager"). Additional remarks reference property management and security shifts, supporting that this building has an on-site manager rather than isolated agent copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.