Kahaluu Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahaluu Gardens
Building Overview
Kahaluu Gardens in Kahaluu — concrete building (1976) with mountain views and pets allowed.
About Kahaluu Gardens
Kahaluu Gardens is a residential building located in the Kahaluu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1976 and is of concrete construction. Mountain views are listed as a feature for the property.
Based on MLS data, unit amenities and property features include window air conditioning and a pet-friendly policy. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided information. The management company is not specified in the MLS data.
Parking is listed as available with assigned stalls. Other details such as maintenance fees, exact unit sizes, and on-site amenities are not provided in the MLS summary; buyers should verify all information and current policies with the listing agent or management and consult official documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found no such statements. The remarks do not provide a percentage or even a qualitative indication of owner occupancy.
I looked for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "multiple elevators," or a specific count like "4 elevators," but found none in the public remarks. There is no evidence in the listing text to confirm whether the building has elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 out of 7 recent listings mark OTCOEX in the association fee includes, indicating common area electricity is covered by the HOA. No public remarks describe utilities in detail or contradict this, so the majority MLS pattern is treated as credible rather than a single-agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/8) list HOTWAT as included in association fees while all 8/8 listings include 'WTRHTR' in inclusions, strongly implying each unit has its own water heater. Public remarks do not mention building-supplied hot water. Given consistent MLS checkbox absence plus universal 'WTRHTR' inclusions, hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance/association fees. The current MLS data shows 8 of 9 listings with SEWER checked, which aligns with prior high-confidence history. No remarks indicate any change, so this looks like a stable building-level feature.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance/association fees. Current MLS data shows WATER in 8 of 9 listings, consistent with historical high-confidence evidence. The repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is a building-level feature rather than isolated copy-paste noise.
BBQ is supported by the MLS amenity data in 5/9 current listings, with one listing remark specifically referencing "the bbq area." Evidence is moderate rather than overwhelming because most public remarks do not mention it, but the repeated MLS checkbox suggests a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data lists car wash (CRWSH) on 5 of 8 current listings, but zero public remarks mention a car wash, suggesting checkbox propagation without agent remark confirmation. Given the MLS prevalence but lack of corroborating remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence (0.70).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. At least 2 current remarks explicitly mention a storage locker, and another listing notes "storage" among the included features, matching the historical MLS pattern where 6 of 9 listings marked storage-related amenities/unit features. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set: current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 9/9 listings, and several remarks explicitly confirm it. Examples include 'full-size washer and dryer,' 'in-unit washer/dryer,' and 'washer/dryer' in renovated move-in-ready units, indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the listings: remarks mention '2 parking spaces,' 'two parking stalls,' '1 parking space,' '1 parking stall,' 'ample street parking,' and 'close access to your parking stall.' The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and agents, so parking appears to be a stable building feature.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported by both the MLS checkbox data and the remarks. Multiple listings refer to a specific stall or assigned parking, including phrases like 'an assigned storage locker' alongside parking stall references and 'close access to your parking stall,' indicating this is not just generic street parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only describe assigned or included stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as monthly parking fee, rental fee, or additional parking charge. The remarks only discuss the number of stalls and street parking, with no fee information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking. None was found, so there is no evidence that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the building. One listing explicitly says "window AC," and another says there are "AC's in both bedrooms," while current MLS inclusions show ACWIUN in all 9 listings. This looks consistent across multiple remarks and MLS entries, so buyers looking for window AC should consider this building.
Concrete construction appears supported by the MLS pattern rather than the remarks: 6 of 9 current listings mark CONCRE, with prior history also at Medium confidence. No public remarks explicitly say "concrete," so this looks like a repeated MLS-level building characteristic rather than a copy-paste remark claim.
Double wall construction has very weak support: just 2 of 9 current listings check the box, and none of the remarks describe "double wall" or "two walls." This looks like an unverified MLS entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
Hollow tile is not supported by the public remarks, and the MLS checkbox appears inconsistent at only 4 of 9 current listings. With low prior confidence and no explicit mention of "hollow tile" or similar wording, this does not rise above a probable MLS copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Just 2 of 7 MLS listings check ABOGRO in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks mention above-ground construction or similar language. The inconsistent and sparse use of this checkbox across agents, combined with no textual corroboration, indicates the building is not reliably characterized as 'above ground' construction for listing purposes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental approval language such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or hotel-style rental terms. Nothing in the public remarks indicates STRs are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references, management-by-hotel language, or brand pool participation and found none. Because there is no evidence of STR allowance, this must also be false.
I searched for phrases like mandatory rental pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, but found nothing. With no evidence of any hotel/STR pool, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to leasehold, ground lease, land lease, and phrases like 'expires' or a specific year, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence here to extract a lease expiry date.
There is direct evidence in the remarks that VA financing is accepted for this building. I found explicit language referencing VA approval/loan approval, which is strong enough to mark this feature true.
I looked for insurance-related phrases like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA insurance language, but none appeared. The public remarks do not confirm full building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety wording such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection," and found nothing. The remarks do not provide any evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported across the remarks: at least 4 listings reference Ko'olau/Koolau or mountain views, including a very explicit 'just outside both bedroom windows' description. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copied note, so this feature should remain true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found no explicit garden-view language in the supplied remarks. Mentions of Ho'omaluhia Botanical Garden are about nearby attractions, not views from the units, so the evidence does not support a true building-level garden view feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the current 8 listings list SUNSET in the view descriptions (0/8) and three list NONE. Public remarks repeatedly mention Koolau mountain views, trade winds, and nearby amenities but include no phrases like 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun,' so there is no evidence the building offers sunset views across listings.
No remarks reference a cemetery view, and none of the descriptions suggest the building overlooks a cemetery. Because the feature is unsupported by the public remarks, it should not be treated as a confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.