Kahala Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahala Towers
Building Overview
Kahala Towers in Waialae-Kahala — concrete building (1968) with ocean and Diamond Head views; pool and resident manager on site.
About Kahala Towers
Kahala Towers is a residential building located in the Waialae-Kahala neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1968 and is constructed of concrete. Units report views that include ocean, mountain, and Diamond Head.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units are served by window air conditioning.
Additional details from MLS indicate parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also provided. Pets are allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information and current conditions with listing agents or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit ownership-occupancy information such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar wording. The remarks describe the building as pet-friendly and well maintained, but provide no owner-occupancy percentage or comparable indicator. Without a stated figure, the level of owner occupancy is unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The listings only mention elevators in passing, such as being near the elevator, not the number of elevators. Because no count is stated, the exact number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Evidence is strong and consistent across the building. The MLS currently has CABTV checked in 12 of 20 listings, and at least one remark explicitly says the maintenance fee includes "cable tv." This looks like a true building-level inclusion rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The main evidence is the current MLS checkbox pattern: 13 of 20 listings have OTCOEX checked. There are no clear public-remark confirmations, so this is moderately strong but still somewhat dependent on agent-entered MLS data that could be copied forward.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This appears to be a correction to a mistaken MLS feature. No current listings check HOTWAT, and many units list a water heater in the unit/inclusions; remarks specifically mention "tankless water heater" and similar in-unit setups. That combination strongly argues against building-supplied hot water being included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is very strong evidence for sewer inclusion. The MLS is nearly unanimous at 19 of 20 listings, and the public remark directly confirms sewer is included in the maintenance fee. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Nineteen of 20 current listings include WATER, and one listing explicitly says the maintenance fee includes water. This is consistent building-level information, not a one-off agent note.
Strong evidence: many listings reference building BBQ facilities (examples: "pool and BBQ," "BBQ area," "BBQ areas"). At least a dozen separate remarks explicitly mention a BBQ or BBQ area across multiple agents, consistent with prior high-confidence MLS data indicating the BBQ amenity is widely offered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1/20 MLS listings indicate a putting green and there are no mentions of "putting green" or similar in the public remarks. The MLS presence appears isolated and uncorroborated by agent remarks, so evidence for a building putting green is weak.
Evidence is moderate rather than overwhelming. Only 5 of 20 current MLS listings explicitly include RECARE, but multiple remarks point to shared amenity space, especially the listing describing "entertainment spaces" plus pools and walking paths. This looks like a real building amenity, but the remarks also suggest some copy-paste reuse rather than consistent explicit verification across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage-related terms such as 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' or 'surf storage.' The public remarks discuss parking, pool, management, and laundry, but nothing indicates surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute has very strong support. The MLS checkbox is present in 18 of 20 listings, and at least one remark explicitly references being "convenient to trash chute and elevators." The evidence is consistent across listings and aligns with the historical high-confidence data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence for a building pool is extremely strong. Across the provided remarks, well over 15 listings explicitly mention a pool, including phrases such as 'a pool,' 'swimming pool,' 'pool and BBQ area,' 'salt water pool,' and 'adult and children's swimming pools.' This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be reliable building-level amenity data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
One listing directly states "salt water pool," which is clear evidence that the pool is saltwater. This is strong, explicit public-remarks evidence.
Strong evidence that Kahala Towers offers in-unit laundry in at least some units. Across the provided listings, many agents explicitly mention "in-unit washer/dryer," "new washer/dryer," "washer and dryer is original," and "full-size washer and dryer," indicating this is not a one-off copy-paste error. The current MLS pattern of 19/20 listings including washer/dryer aligns with the remarks and supports high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, or quarters. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and a hall laundry area, so there is no evidence the community laundry is paid.
I searched the public remarks for language like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or 'floor-by-floor laundry.' The only laundry references were to in-unit washer/dryer and a 'hall laundry area,' which does not confirm laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available in this building. Multiple listings mention “one assigned parking stall,” “two parking stalls, one covered & one open,” “guest parking,” and even specific stall numbers. Evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be repeated by different agents, not a one-off copy-paste.
Assigned parking is supported by both the MLS checkbox data and the listing remarks. Many units specifically say “one assigned parking stall,” “assigned open parking,” or “assigned covered parking,” indicating reserved stalls are commonly offered in the building. The evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agents/listings.
Moderate-to-strong evidence that the building offers covered parking: 6 of 20 MLS records check covered/garage, and multiple public remarks explicitly state covered stalls such as "one covered & one open" and "1 assigned covered parking stall," indicating covered parking is available in the building.
I searched for terms like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings consistently describe assigned parking stalls, covered/open stalls, and stall locations, but they do not state that the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking rental charge, monthly parking fee, or additional parking cost. The remarks discuss assigned parking, guest parking, and availability, but no listing states a separate parking fee.
Evidence that guest parking is available: 6 of 20 MLS checkbox entries list guest parking and several agent remarks explicitly mention "guest parking" or "guest parking and street parking," so the building offers guest parking though it appears less ubiquitous than assigned stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar queue-related language. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob-based access terms such as 'key card access,' 'fob access,' 'card reader,' or 'electronic access.' The remarks mention secure entry, security guard, and security cameras, but do not specify card or fob access.
This feature is strongly supported by the historical MLS checkbox data and reinforced by current remarks. Multiple listings mention security-related amenities such as "secure entry," "security," "security cameras," and "24/7 security," indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. The evidence appears consistent across several agents/listings.
I searched for explicit patrol language like 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' or 'patrolled building.' The remarks reference security, security guards, 24/7 security, and secure entry, but do not confirm a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building feature based on current MLS checkbox data: 17 of 20 listings mark construction_materials as concrete. None of the public remarks explicitly call it out, which suggests agents may be copying MLS building data rather than describing it in remarks, but the repeated checkbox pattern still provides strong evidence.
4 of 20 current MLS listings check 'DOUWAL' for double-wall construction, but none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction. Included because some listings indicate it, but confidence is low due to lack of remark corroboration (0.40).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings checks 'SLAB' and there are zero mentions of 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' in the public remarks. Due to the single checkbox and no corroborating remarks, the feature is included with low confidence (0.25).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 7 of 20 current MLS listings have 'ABOGRO' checked, and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or related details. With no historical verification and no explicit remarks, the checkbox usage appears inconsistent and likely copy/paste; therefore this feature is omitted as a verified building-level attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental indicators such as "STR permitted," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU," as well as restrictive phrases like "30-day minimum" or "owner-occupant only." None appear in the remarks, so short-term rental allowance is not supported by the listings.
I searched for references to hotel rental pools or hotel-managed programs such as Hilton, Trump, or Ritz-style pools. The remarks do not mention any hotel rental pool participation, and there is no evidence that STR is allowed.
I looked for language indicating required participation in a rental program, such as "mandatory hotel pool" or "must be in rental program." No such wording appears in the remarks, and there is no evidence of an STR program at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease, leasehold, lease expiration, or renewal language such as "lease expires 2050" or "renewed through 2075." The remarks do not mention a leasehold expiry year, so the expiration date remains unknown from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted." Nothing in the listings indicates VA eligibility, so this cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
I searched the public remarks for HOA insurance language like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. The listings discuss HOA fees, special assessments, and building amenities, but do not mention insurance coverage. There is no evidence here to confirm the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks mention asbestos remediation, re-piping, security, and new elevators, but nothing about a fire/life safety evaluation passing. With no explicit confirmation, this remains unsupported.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers ocean views: 14 of 20 current MLS listings list OCEAN in view_descriptions, and multiple public remarks explicitly state "ocean views", "panoramic ocean", "ocean and Diamond Head views", and "coastline". Mentions appear across numerous agent postings rather than a single copy/paste, supporting high confidence that buyers can find units with ocean views in this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference Diamond Head views (e.g., "Diamond Head views", "Diamond Head directly from your living room", "sweeping... views stretching from Diamond Head to Koko Head"). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks, indicating the building offers Diamond Head-view units.
Across the listings, 10 of 20 MLS entries mark CITY in the view field, but the public remarks themselves consistently describe ocean, Diamond Head, coastline, golf course, treetop, and neighborhood views instead of city views. This looks more like checkbox-level MLS data than agent-verified wording, so the evidence for city views is moderate and somewhat inconsistent.
Several listings explicitly reference coastline/shoreline views (e.g., "panoramic coastline & tree-top ocean view", "view of the ocean/coastline"). Multiple agent remarks corroborate the MLS entries, supporting that the building offers coastline-view units.
No analysis available
Some listings explicitly mention golf course or Waialae Country Club views (for example, "view of the ocean/coastline and Golf Course", "Waialae Country Club"). This is not as widespread as ocean or Diamond Head claims, but multiple agent remarks indicate the building does offer golf-course-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to watching Friday night fireworks from a lanai or from the unit/building. The remarks mention ocean, Diamond Head, golf course, and coastline views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "on-site management," "on-site manager & office," "resident manager," and "onsite manager," matching the historical MLS RESMAN checkbox pattern (17 of 20 listings). The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.