Kahala Beach
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahala Beach
Building Overview
Kahala Beach in Waialae-Kahala (1966); concrete construction with ocean and sunset views, pool and fitness center.
About Kahala Beach
Kahala Beach is a residential building located in the Waialae‑Kahala neighborhood, built in 1966. The structure is concrete construction. Size and unit mix details were not provided in the available MLS data.
Building amenities include an on-site pool, a fitness center, a resident manager and a security guard. Units have central air conditioning and the building offers ocean and sunset views according to the MLS records.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company was listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, fees, rules and current management directly with listing agents or building representatives.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit ownership data such as a percentage figure or phrases like "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." The remarks only discuss individual unit occupancy, furnishings, and leasehold status, so the building-wide owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count, since this field should only be set from direct evidence. The listings confirm the building has at least one elevator, but they do not state how many elevators there are, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning appears to be a standard included expense in this building. Current remarks repeatedly mention "central AC" and even describe units as "centrally air-conditioned," matching the strong MLS history. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. Multiple remarks explicitly state cable is included, including phrasing like "basic cable TV" and "all utilities... cable." The repetition across listings suggests this is standard for the building rather than a one-off agent note.
There is no explicit remark evidence that maintenance fees cover common-area electricity such as hallway or elevator power. Although MLS history shows moderate support, the current descriptions only mention unit-level utilities. Given the mixed history and lack of explicit confirmation, this feature should not be assumed included.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is one of the clearest building-level features. Multiple listings say the maintenance fee includes "electricity" or "elec.," reinforcing the MLS pattern. The evidence is strong and consistent across remarks.
No analysis available
Hot water remains strongly supported by the MLS history for this building. While the current remarks do not frequently name hot water directly, the historical record is very consistent and there is no conflicting evidence in the remarks. No strong indicator suggests this should be removed.
Internet service is clearly part of the maintenance fee for this building. Several remarks explicitly state "internet" or "fiber internet" is included, aligning with the MLS history. The pattern appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Sewer is a unanimous included expense for this building. Current remarks repeatedly reference "water/sewer" in the HOA fee, which matches the MLS data perfectly. This is one of the most reliable building-level inclusions in the dataset.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both the remarks and the MLS history. Multiple listings explicitly mention water or water/sewer as included, and the historical record shows this in a large majority of entries. This appears to be a genuine shared building expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The exercise room/fitness center appears to be a confirmed shared amenity at Kahala Beach Apartments. Across the supplied remarks, multiple listings describe it directly as an "exercise room," "gym," or "fitness center," including phrases like "exercise room with a view" and "exercise gym." The consistency across many listings supports strong building-level availability rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
Inconsistent evidence: MEEROO appears on some MLS checkboxes (a minority of listings) but public remarks do not mention meeting or conference rooms. Due to lack of corroborating remarks and prior low confidence, the building is unlikely to offer a formal meeting/conference room as a notable shared amenity.
Patio/deck amenities are clearly supported by the remarks: many listings mention a "lanai," "covered lanai," "open lanai," or "wide-open patio." This appears across a large share of the listings and is reinforced by the current MLS amenities checkboxes (2/20).
Moderate evidence that the property offers walking/jogging paths: 7 of 20 current listings have the WAJOPA checkbox checked and multiple remarks reference "walking paths" (example: "koi ponds along the walking paths"). Mentions are present but not as pervasive as the exercise-room references, so confidence is moderate and may reflect partial site paths or copy-paste across some listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks in the supplied listings reference a recreation room, rec room, game room, or similar multi-purpose space. With only 4 of 20 listings currently checking RECROO and no supporting remark evidence, the feature does not appear reliably supported at the building level. The available evidence is too thin to treat it as a confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage access appears to be a real feature at Kahala Beach Apartments, not just agent boilerplate. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention storage-related amenities or unit features, including "additional storage adjacent to your parking space," "extra storage," "small storage included," and built-in storage. Combined with the strong MLS history (18/20 amenities, 10/20 unit features), confidence is very high that storage/locker availability exists in the building.
I searched for surfboard-storage wording like "surfboard storage," "board storage," and similar amenity descriptions. The remarks mention general storage, storage by parking stalls, and extra storage, but nothing specifically for surfboards.
No analysis available
There is solid evidence that the building has a trash chute system. Although most remarks do not mention it, the explicit reference to being near "parking stalls, and trash chute" corroborates the MLS amenity data. Combined with the high rate of current TRACHU checkmarks, this supports a building-level trash chute amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is extremely strong and consistent across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention shared building amenities such as a "heated pool," "oceanfront pool," and "sparkling pool," showing this is a building-level feature rather than a unit-specific claim. The pool appears in remarks from many different listings/agents, so this looks like confirmed amenity data rather than copy-paste noise.
The pool-heated feature is strongly confirmed. Roughly 15+ listings mention it directly with phrases like 'heated pool,' 'heated, salt water pool,' 'heated tiled pool,' and 'ocean side heated pool,' while other listings simply reference the pool without repeating the temperature detail. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real shared amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
At least one listing directly states the pool is a salt water pool, which is strong public-remark evidence. Other remarks reference the oceanfront/heated pool, consistent with the same amenity.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for Kahala Beach Apartments. Multiple listings explicitly mention "NEW LG side-by-side Washer/Dryer" or "washer/dryer in unit," and the MLS history is 20/20 for washer/dryer inclusions. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and appears to reflect a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for public references to paid community laundry such as coin-op, coin laundry, card-operated, or quarters. The remarks instead mention in-unit washer/dryer or general amenities, with nothing indicating a paid shared laundry room.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer in some units, not a building-wide laundry facility on each floor.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports assigned parking. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'one assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned covered parking stalls,' and 'two covered, assigned parking stalls,' indicating this is not a one-off copy-paste artifact. The feature appears consistently across many listings.
Very strong evidence shows the building offers covered parking. Numerous listings mention 'covered parking stalls,' '2 covered parking stalls,' 'covered parking and storage,' and even 'easy garage access,' confirming the amenity across multiple agents and listing types. This is consistent with the historical MLS pattern.
I looked for language like deeded parking, owned stalls, or parking included in the deed and found none. The remarks instead consistently describe included, assigned, or covered stalls, which suggests parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a separate parking charge, monthly parking rental, or additional parking cost, and found none. The listings repeatedly describe parking as included with the unit, but they do not state any monthly parking fee, so the fee remains unknown from the remarks.
Guest parking is supported by both the MLS history and current remarks. At least a few listings explicitly mention 'guest parking' or 'ample guest spaces,' and the feature also appears in the historical MLS parking fields, making this a credible building-level amenity rather than an isolated claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found none. The remarks instead suggest parking is available with individual units or as assigned stalls.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic doors. The remarks mention 24-hour security, security patrol, and a keyed lobby, but do not describe a card-based access system.
Security guard service appears to be a true building-wide amenity at Kahala Beach Apartments. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, with several using the exact phrases "24-hour security," "24-hour security guards," and "security patrol," across different agents and unit types. This is consistent with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 listings had the SECGUA amenity checked.
The remarks clearly support active security service, including a direct 'security patrol' mention in one listing. Additional listings reference 24-hour security and security guards, reinforcing that patrol service is present.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is clearly present in this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in remarks, including phrases like “central AC,” “centrally air-conditioned unit,” and “all utilities include ... central AC,” which aligns with the historical MLS checkbox data. The evidence is strong across many listings and appears consistently supported rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for concrete construction is very strong and consistent. One listing explicitly states the unit was taken down to the 'bare concrete shell,' and the current MLS data shows CONCRE in 20/20 listings. This appears to be reliable building-level information rather than copy-paste noise.
Double-wall construction is not supported by the public remarks reviewed. Only 3 of 20 MLS listings currently carry DOUWAL, and none of the agent remarks describe double-wall construction or related details. Based on the available evidence, this feature should not be treated as confirmed for the building.
No analysis available
There is no public-remark support for masonry or stucco across the listings reviewed. With only 5 of 20 MLS records checking MASSTU and no explicit language from agents, the evidence leans against treating this as a confirmed building feature. This appears to be weak, likely copy-paste MLS data rather than verified construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for above-ground construction: 8 of 20 current listings check ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks explicitly explain or confirm the feature. This looks more like checkbox-level MLS data than remark-backed verification, so confidence is only moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental wording such as "STR allowed," "vacation rental allowed," NUC/TVU references, or other legal short-term rental language, and found none. The remarks mention "vacation home" and "vacation destination," but those are marketing terms and do not establish that short-term rentals are permitted.
I looked for hotel-pool terms such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded rental program references and found nothing. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool and found none. There are no remarks suggesting a required hotel program, and with no evidence STR is allowed, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The lease expiry is repeated consistently across the listings, almost always as July 15, 2027. This is the clearest and most recent lease termination year mentioned, so 2027 is the correct expiration year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA loans accepted," and similar phrases, but found nothing. Because there is no supporting evidence in the listings, this is treated as not indicated in the remarks.
I looked for HOA insurance wording that would indicate the building is fully insured with walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage status at all, so there is no evidence to support this feature being true.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar inspection language. Nothing in the remarks references FLSE, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed across the building. Roughly 20+ remarks mention them, including phrases like "Pacific Ocean," "oceanfront," "direct, unobstructed ocean views," and "peek-a-boo ocean views." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a single copy-paste error.
There is limited but explicit evidence for mountain views: 1 of 20 current listings includes MOUNTA in the view description, and one remark directly mentions "mountain views." This looks like a real building/unit view option, but the signal is much weaker than for garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are strongly supported across the current listings, with 16 of 20 including GARDEN in the view description. Multiple remarks reinforce this with phrases like "garden views," "lush landscaping," "gardens for your enjoyment," and "garden/tree top views," suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views appear to be available in at least a few units, but evidence is moderate rather than pervasive. One remark explicitly says "Wake up to a beautiful sunrise," while the MLS data shows 2/20 listings with sunrise-related view descriptions. This suggests sunrise exposure exists in some units, though it is not described as a building-wide universal feature.
Confidence 90%: Remarks mention a unit that 'faces almost directly West' and another where 'Sunset over Diamond Head will become a highlight of each day,' as well as 'spectacular sunsets.'
No analysis available
I searched for direct claims like "watch fireworks from the lanai" or "fireworks view from the unit." The remarks talk about ocean, sunset, Diamond Head, and beach views, but do not state that fireworks are visible from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by the MLS history, with 16 of 20 current listings showing RESMAN in amenities. None of the provided remarks explicitly confirm or contradict it, which suggests the amenity is being carried in the MLS consistently rather than being a copy-paste error. This is sufficient to keep resident_manager=true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.