Kahala Beach
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahala Beach
Building Overview
Kahala Beach in Waialae-Kahala (1966); concrete construction with ocean and sunset views, pool and fitness center.
About Kahala Beach
Kahala Beach is a residential building located in the Waialae‑Kahala neighborhood, built in 1966. The structure is concrete construction. Size and unit mix details were not provided in the available MLS data.
Building amenities include an on-site pool, a fitness center, a resident manager and a security guard. Units have central air conditioning and the building offers ocean and sunset views according to the MLS records.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company was listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, fees, rules and current management directly with listing agents or building representatives.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric ownership data and descriptive phrases like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied,' but the remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy rate. One listing mentions buyer occupancy timing, but that is not the same as owner-occupancy percentage.
I looked for explicit counts such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a written number, but the remarks never provide one. The listings only reference elevator access in general, so there is not enough evidence to determine the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning appears to be a standard included expense for this building. Several remarks explicitly mention 'central AC' or 'centrally air-conditioned unit,' and the MLS data is consistently positive across most listings. Evidence is strong and repetitive across different remarks.
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings state 'basic cable TV' or 'cable' is included, and the MLS history is highly consistent at 18 of 20 records. This looks like a real building-level amenity rather than agent copy-paste noise.
There is no explicit remark evidence that maintenance fees cover common-area electricity such as hallway or elevator power. Although MLS history shows moderate support, the current descriptions only mention unit-level utilities. Given the mixed history and lack of explicit confirmation, this feature should not be assumed included.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is one of the clearest building-level features. Numerous listings explicitly list electricity among the included utilities, and MLS history is nearly unanimous at 19 of 20 records. This is high-confidence and consistent across many remarks.
No analysis available
Hot water is strongly supported by MLS history and is not contradicted by the remarks. While current remarks do not always name hot water directly, multiple listings describe 'all utilities' being included, which is consistent with the historical pattern. There is no evidence here of a unit-level water heater that would negate this feature.
Internet service is clearly part of the maintenance fee for this building. Several listings explicitly call out internet or fiber internet, and the MLS data supports this in most records. The evidence is strong and repeated.
No analysis available
Sewer is a unanimous building-level included expense. Remarks repeatedly state 'water/sewer' or similar wording, and every MLS record in the dataset includes sewer. This is the strongest possible level of support.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both the remarks and the MLS history. Multiple listings explicitly mention water or water/sewer as included, and the historical record shows this in a large majority of entries. This appears to be a genuine shared building expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports an exercise room/fitness center. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly say "exercise room," "gym," or "fitness center," including phrases like "amenities include pool, exercise room and library" and "oceanfront exercise room." This appears consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the 20/20 MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
Inconsistent evidence: MEEROO appears on some MLS checkboxes (a minority of listings) but public remarks do not mention meeting or conference rooms. Due to lack of corroborating remarks and prior low confidence, the building is unlikely to offer a formal meeting/conference room as a notable shared amenity.
Patio/deck amenities are clearly supported by the remarks: many listings mention a "lanai," "covered lanai," "open lanai," or "wide-open patio." This appears across a large share of the listings and is reinforced by the current MLS amenities checkboxes (2/20).
Moderate evidence that the property offers walking/jogging paths: 7 of 20 current listings have the WAJOPA checkbox checked and multiple remarks reference "walking paths" (example: "koi ponds along the walking paths"). Mentions are present but not as pervasive as the exercise-room references, so confidence is moderate and may reflect partial site paths or copy-paste across some listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak/limited evidence: only 3 of 20 MLS listings currently check RECROO and the public remarks supplied contain no mentions of a recreation/rec/game room. This pattern suggests the few checked boxes are likely agent copy/paste rather than a genuine, building-wide amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage/locker access appears to be a real building feature, not just isolated agent copy, because multiple listings across different remarks mention it. Current remarks specifically say "additional storage adjacent to your parking space," "extra storage," and "covered parking and storage at your stall," reinforcing the historical MLS storage indicators.
I searched for surfboard-specific storage references such as "surfboard storage," "board storage," and similar wording. The listings mention storage in general at some units, but nothing indicates dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
There is good building-level evidence for a trash chute system. While most remarks do not mention it, one listing explicitly references "parking stalls, and trash chute," which supports the MLS amenity checkbox. The current MLS data still shows it in 15 of 20 listings, so this is best treated as a real shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is extremely strong and consistent across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention shared building amenities such as a "heated pool," "oceanfront pool," and "sparkling pool," showing this is a building-level feature rather than a unit-specific claim. The pool appears in remarks from many different listings/agents, so this looks like confirmed amenity data rather than copy-paste noise.
Moderately high confidence that the pool is heated: roughly 8–9 listings and several public remarks explicitly state 'heated pool' or variants ('ocean side heated, salt water pool', 'heated oceanfront tiled pool'), and the HEAPOO amenity flag appears in a subset of MLS entries. While not every listing's pool_features checkbox shows 'HEATED', the repeated explicit remarks across multiple agents support including pool_heated.
Several remarks directly state that the pool is salt water, including wording like "salt water pool" and "ocean side heated, salt water pool." This is clear public-remarks evidence for a saltwater pool.
Strong evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. The MLS history is 20/20 for washer/dryer inclusions, and several current public remarks explicitly mention it, including "Washer/dryer included" and "NEW LG side by side Washer/Dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be reinforced rather than just copy-pasted checkbox data.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin laundry, paid laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks instead reference in-unit washer/dryer in some listings, with no evidence of a shared paid laundry setup.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry on every floor," and similar wording. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, but nothing indicates community laundry facilities on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for assigned parking. Historical MLS data shows ASSIGN in 20/20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly mention assigned stalls, reserved stalls, and side-by-side assigned parking. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Very strong evidence that the building offers covered parking. The historical MLS data is unanimous, and current remarks across many listings consistently describe covered stalls and garage access. This is not isolated language; it appears repeatedly in multiple remarks.
I looked for terms like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and did not find them. The listings consistently describe assigned/covered stalls, which indicates parking is present but not explicitly deeded in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as "monthly parking charge," "parking rental," or an additional parking cost and found nothing. The remarks discuss stalls being included or assigned, but do not identify any separate parking fee.
Guest parking is supported by both historical data and current remarks. While not every listing mentions it, the MLS history shows GUEST in 15/20 entries, and at least one remark explicitly states 'ample guest spaces.' The evidence is strong enough to retain this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The listings instead refer to assigned, included, or guest parking.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms such as key card entry, fob access, card reader, and keycard security. The remarks mention a keyed lobby and security presence, but nothing explicitly indicates a card-based access system.
Security guard service appears to be a true building-wide amenity. Multiple listings explicitly mention "24-hour security," "24-hour security guards," and "security patrol," showing consistent confirmation across different agents and listings rather than a one-off copy-paste note. The historical MLS record was also uniformly positive (20/20 with SECGUA), so confidence is very high.
The public remarks repeatedly reference active security service, including direct phrases like "Includes security patrol" and "24 hour security." That is strong evidence that the building has security patrol service.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported by both the historical MLS data and current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention "central AC," "centrally air-conditioned unit," and HOA utilities including "central AC," indicating this is a building-wide amenity available to buyers. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and does not appear to be an isolated or accidental checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. One listing explicitly says the unit was taken down to the 'bare concrete shell,' and the MLS data is even stronger with 20 of 20 listings marking CONCRE. This looks like a consistent building characteristic rather than copy-paste noise.
Double-wall construction is not supported by the public remarks reviewed. Only 3 of 20 MLS listings currently carry DOUWAL, and none of the agent remarks describe double-wall construction or related details. Based on the available evidence, this feature should not be treated as confirmed for the building.
No analysis available
There is no public-remark support for masonry or stucco across the listings reviewed. With only 5 of 20 MLS records checking MASSTU and no explicit language from agents, the evidence leans against treating this as a confirmed building feature. This appears to be weak, likely copy-paste MLS data rather than verified construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited evidence for 'above ground' construction: only 7 of 20 current listings check ABOGRO in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' or related phrasing. Given the low historical confidence and absence of corroborating remarks, this feature is likely an inconsistent MLS checkbox entry rather than a true, building-level attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or similar phrases and found none. Because the remarks do not explicitly authorize short-term rentals, this is marked as not allowed based on public remarks.
I looked for hotel-pool terminology like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or references to a branded rental program and found nothing. Since STR is not established in the remarks, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
I searched for wording such as "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out" and found no such references. With no evidence of any hotel rental program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The lease expiration is consistently and repeatedly mentioned across the remarks. The most specific date given is July 15, 2027, so that is the best extracted expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA loans accepted," or similar phrases and found none. With no evidence in the listings, VA financing cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
I looked for insurance language such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or similar HOA coverage statements. The remarks do not mention any of these, so full building insurance is not established from the listings.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'FLSE passed,' 'life safety compliant,' 'fire safety certified,' and 'passed fire inspection,' but found nothing. With no explicit public-remark evidence, this feature cannot be confirmed as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed across the building. Roughly 20+ remarks mention them, including phrases like "Pacific Ocean," "oceanfront," "direct, unobstructed ocean views," and "peek-a-boo ocean views." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers garden views: 15 of 20 current listings include garden in their view descriptions and many remarks explicitly say things like 'Each room is light filled with garden views', 'lanai ... overlooking the garden greenery', and 'cool breezes and garden/tree top views'. These phrases appear across multiple listings and agents (some reuse language), indicating a consistent building feature rather than a single erroneous listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views appear to be available in at least a few units, but evidence is moderate rather than pervasive. One remark explicitly says "Wake up to a beautiful sunrise," while the MLS data shows 2/20 listings with sunrise-related view descriptions. This suggests sunrise exposure exists in some units, though it is not described as a building-wide universal feature.
Confidence 90%: Remarks mention a unit that 'faces almost directly West' and another where 'Sunset over Diamond Head will become a highlight of each day,' as well as 'spectacular sunsets.'
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as "watch fireworks from the lanai" or "see fireworks from the unit." The remarks describe ocean, sunset, Diamond Head, and golf views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by MLS amenity reporting: 16 of 20 current listings include RESMAN, with prior history also around 15/20. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, but there is no evidence suggesting the feature was removed, so this appears to be consistent agent reporting rather than a one-off checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.