Kaahumanu Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaahumanu Plaza
Building Overview
Kaahumanu Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1973) with a pool and window AC units.
About Kaahumanu Plaza
Kaahumanu Plaza is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
The building offers a pool as an amenity and units are served by window air conditioning. Pets are allowed at Kaahumanu Plaza, and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS information.
Parking is available at the property and is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is not identified in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, management, and any HOA fees or other details with listing agents or association documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or qualitative descriptions such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks contain no owner-occupancy information, so the percentage cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the public remarks for elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators'), plural wording, or phrases like 'multiple elevators.' None were found in any of the listings, so the number of elevators cannot be confirmed from remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that common-area electricity is included. Across the listings, agents repeatedly describe the HOA/maintenance as covering electric/common electric, and the current MLS data shows OTCOEX checked in 8 of 9 records. This looks consistent across multiple remarks rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Electricity is clearly included. All 9 current MLS records have ELECTR checked, and multiple remarks explicitly state “Maintenance fee includes Electric” or “maintenance fees cover electricity.” This is consistent across the dataset and strongly reliable.
Gas is consistently included in the building’s maintenance fees. Every current MLS record lists GAS, and several agent remarks state that HOA fees include gas or that maintenance covers gas. The evidence is broad and consistent.
Hot water appears to be included in the HOA/maintenance fees. The current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 8 of 9 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly list hot water among included utilities. There is no counter-signal from WTRHTR inclusions.
Internet service is not supported by the remarks or the stronger historical pattern. Agents repeatedly list electricity, gas, water, hot water, and sewer, but never internet, while only 3 of 9 current MLS records include INTSER. That is weak evidence compared with the other utility inclusions.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included. Every current MLS record has SEWER checked, and multiple remarks explicitly mention sewer as part of the HOA/maintenance coverage. This is one of the most consistent features in the dataset.
Water is consistently included in maintenance fees. The current MLS data shows WATER in all 9 listings, and several remarks explicitly state that HOA fees include water. The evidence is strong and uniform across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (3 of 8 in the MLS snapshot) have the patio/deck checkbox checked and at least one remark explicitly says the unit "offers a private lanai." Remarks also reference lanai/outdoor space and covered patios in agent copy, so there is strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck amenities for some units rather than being a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings check the recreation-area (RECARE) box. Remarks repeatedly mention shared amenities like a 'community pool' and a 'garden plot/community garden' for residents, indicating common recreation space even if not labeled explicitly as a 'recreation area.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by the MLS amenity data across all 9 current listings, with every listing showing TRACHU. The public remarks do not mention it directly, but there is no contrary evidence, and the consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a stable building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that Kaahumanu Plaza has a shared swimming pool. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "swimming pool," "community pool," or "refreshing pool," and the MLS amenity data already shows POOL checked across all current listings. This looks like a stable building amenity, reinforced by repeated remarks from multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Kaahumanu Plaza has shared laundry facilities. At least 2 listings explicitly say "community laundry" / "laundry," including one listing that also describes the building as having "secured building access, community laundry." This matches the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data (COMLAU in 9/9 listings).
No analysis available
No analysis available
All eight listings and the MLS parking checkboxes indicate parking is provided. Multiple remarks explicitly state parking: 'one open parking stall,' '1 assigned parking stall,' and 'large, covered parking stall,' showing consistent confirmation across listings rather than a single outlier.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by the listing remarks. Multiple remarks explicitly say "1 assigned, covered parking stall" and "1 assigned parking stall," with one additional listing referencing a reserved/assigned stall by implication. The evidence appears consistent across several agents and is not just a copied checkbox.
Covered parking is well documented in the remarks. At least four listings explicitly mention covered parking, including phrases like "1 covered parking," "1 assigned, covered parking stall," and "Large, covered parking stall." This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple remarks and supports the building-level feature.
The listings consistently mention assigned/covered parking, which indicates parking exists, but they do not state that it is deeded or owned with the unit. I found no deeded-parking language in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any stated monthly parking cost or additional parking charge and found none. The remarks only describe the parking stall type, not any fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'parking waiting list,' or similar wording and found nothing. The remarks instead suggest the unit comes with a parking stall.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings supports window AC. Remarks explicitly mention 'window A/C,' 'window A/C appliance charge,' and a maintenance fee surcharge tied to the A/C, with no sign of a legitimate change away from this feature. This looks consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported for Kaahumanu Plaza: 9 out of 9 current MLS listings list construction_materials as CONCRE. None of the public remarks contradict this, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than agent copy-paste.
Double-wall construction is not well supported for this building. It appears in only 2 of 9 current listings, and no public remarks mention 'double wall,' 'double-wall construction,' or 'two walls.' This looks inconsistent and unsupported compared with the concrete evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators, including NUC/TVU language, vacation-rental references, and 30-day minimum rules, but found none. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel-pool references such as hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed rental language and found none. Since the remarks do not establish STR allowance, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I searched for 'mandatory pool,' 'required to participate,' 'must be in rental program,' or similar wording and found nothing. There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool, let alone a mandatory one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'lease expires 20xx,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' or any renewal/extension year. None of the remarks mention lease tenure or an expiry date.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan language and found none. The listings talk about financing incentives and buyer closing-cost credits, but nothing that confirms VA approval.
I searched for insurance-related language including 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or other comprehensive building insurance references. No such language appears in the remarks, so full HOA insurance coverage is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or similar compliance statements. The remarks only mention the building is secured and has a resident manager, but nothing about fire/life safety evaluation status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/5) advertise mountain views, and 4/5 MLS entries explicitly state the view as 'None'. Remarks focus on location and amenities without any mountain or Koolau view references, suggesting this building is not marketed for mountain views.
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported for this building. At least 2 listings explicitly mention "overlooking downtown and sunset views," and the feature is consistent with the prior high-confidence note that some units have city-facing outlooks. This appears to be real building-level variation rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one public remark explicitly says 'on-site resident manager' and the MLS RESMAN checkbox is set in 3 of 8 current listings. Historical confidence was Medium; while some agents may copy/paste amenities, the explicit remark plus multiple listings checking RESMAN provides reasonable evidence the building has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.