Kaahumanu Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaahumanu Plaza
Building Overview
Kaahumanu Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1973) with a pool and window AC units.
About Kaahumanu Plaza
Kaahumanu Plaza is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
The building offers a pool as an amenity and units are served by window air conditioning. Pets are allowed at Kaahumanu Plaza, and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS information.
Parking is available at the property and is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is not identified in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, management, and any HOA fees or other details with listing agents or association documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements or percentages (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Because owner-occupancy is a numeric percent and there is no explicit figure in the remarks, I cannot infer or guess a percentage.
I searched all public remarks for 'elevator', 'elevators', numeric mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators'), and related phrases but found no references. Because there is no explicit statement in the remarks and no reliable numeric current value available, I cannot determine the number of elevators and will not guess.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: 7 of 8 current MLS records have OTCOEX checked and multiple agent remarks state building/common electricity is included (phrases like 'Maintenance fees conveniently include all utilities'). Evidence is repeated across different agents and listings, indicating this is a true building-level feature.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence: all 8 listings have the ELECTR checkbox and numerous agent remarks explicitly state 'Maintenance fees include electricity' or 'includes Electric,' confirming electricity is included in the HOA fees.
Clear, consistent evidence across listings: 8 of 8 current MLS records list GAS and many remarks explicitly mention 'gas' being included, indicating gas is part of the maintenance fee.
Strong evidence that hot water is included: 7 of 8 MLS records include HOTWAT and multiple agent remarks explicitly list 'hot water' as part of the maintenance fees; absence of WTRHTR supports building-supplied hot water rather than unit water heaters.
Agents repeatedly enumerate included utilities (electricity, gas, water, hot water, sewer, basic cable TV) yet never mention internet service. Historical analysis already indicated internet was not included despite occasional MLS checkbox use, suggesting those checks are likely copy/paste errors. Given the detailed utility descriptions omitting internet, it is very likely not part of the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Very strong and consistent evidence: all 8 listings have the SEWER checkbox and multiple agent remarks explicitly mention sewer being included in the maintenance fee.
Clear, consistent evidence across the board: all 8 MLS records include WATER and many agent remarks explicitly state water is included in the HOA fees, confirming water is covered by maintenance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (3 of 8 in the MLS snapshot) have the patio/deck checkbox checked and at least one remark explicitly says the unit "offers a private lanai." Remarks also reference lanai/outdoor space and covered patios in agent copy, so there is strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck amenities for some units rather than being a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings check the recreation-area (RECARE) box. Remarks repeatedly mention shared amenities like a 'community pool' and a 'garden plot/community garden' for residents, indicating common recreation space even if not labeled explicitly as a 'recreation area.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings for the building list the TRACHU (trash chute) amenity. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute', but the consistent, unanimous amenity checkbox across multiple listings/agents provides strong evidence the building offers a trash chute. While agents sometimes copy/paste, the cross-listing consistency suggests this is a genuine building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool: MLS amenities have POOL checked on all 8/8 current listings and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'swimming pool', 'community pool', or 'pool' (appears across several agent remark blocks). Evidence is consistent across agents and listings, indicating a building-level amenity rather than isolated unit features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: 8 of 8 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity and the public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' and 'shared laundry' in multiple places (e.g., 'community laundry and 1 assigned...' and 'community laundry'). Mentions appear across different remarks/agents and align with historical MLS checkbox data, indicating a consistent, building-level shared laundry facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All eight listings and the MLS parking checkboxes indicate parking is provided. Multiple remarks explicitly state parking: 'one open parking stall,' '1 assigned parking stall,' and 'large, covered parking stall,' showing consistent confirmation across listings rather than a single outlier.
Assigned parking is consistently documented: 4 of 7 listing remarks explicitly mention assigned parking ('1 assigned, covered parking stall', 'assigned parking space', '1 assigned parking stall'). Combined with prior MLS checkbox consistency (high confidence), evidence is strong across multiple agents and listings.
Covered parking is supported by 4 of 7 listing remarks explicitly advertising covered stalls ('1 assigned, covered parking stall', '1 covered parking', 'Large, covered parking stall'—appearing in several agent remarks). This aligns with historical MLS entries showing covered parking in multiple listings, so confidence is high.
The listings repeatedly reference an 'assigned' or 'covered' parking stall ('1 assigned parking stall', 'one open parking stall', 'large, covered parking stall'), but none explicitly call parking 'deeded' or 'owned with the unit'. Therefore there is no evidence parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'additional parking cost' and found no numeric or descriptive parking fee information. Listings describe assigned parking but do not state a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist (e.g., 'parking waitlist', 'join waitlist for parking') and found none. The remarks consistently describe an assigned/covered stall without mentioning a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units use window air conditioners: MLS inclusions show ACWIUN in 5 of 8 listings, and the public remarks repeatedly state 'window A/C', 'Other fee: window A/C appliance charge', and note a $50 surcharge for A/C that can be removed by removing the A/C. Multiple agents' remarks consistently mention window units rather than a single copy/paste instance.
All 8 current MLS listings for the building list construction_materials as CONCRE (concrete). Public remarks across the listings make no contradictory statements (no mentions of wood-frame or other materials), so evidence is consistent and strong across multiple agent listings rather than appearing corrected or disputed.
Double-wall construction is weakly supported, appearing in only 1 of 6 listings and never mentioned in remarks, while all listings agree on concrete construction. The pattern strongly suggests a one-off checkbox mistake rather than actual double-wall construction for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings market the unit to investors and note it can be rented or furnished, but they do not explicitly state that short-term rentals or vacation rentals are allowed. In the absence of explicit STR permission language, I mark STR as not allowed based on the remarks.
I looked for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or management by a hotel brand and found none. Because there is no evidence of STR allowance and no mention of a hotel rental pool, this is set to false with high confidence.
There is no indication of a required or mandatory hotel/rental pool in the remarks. Given the absence of any rental-pool language and that STR is not confirmed, mandatory pool participation is set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'lease expires 20xx', 'land lease to', or any 4-digit lease expiry year and found no mentions. Because there is no indication the property is leasehold or a lease expiry year, the expiry year is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan language such as 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No evidence in the provided remarks indicates the building is VA-approved.
I searched for terms like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no mentions in the public remarks. With no explicit statement that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance, this is marked false with medium confidence (absence of claim in remarks).
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety', 'life safety', and similar language and found no references. In the absence of any explicit statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, the feature is marked false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it is not claimed).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/5) advertise mountain views, and 4/5 MLS entries explicitly state the view as 'None'. Remarks focus on location and amenities without any mountain or Koolau view references, suggesting this building is not marketed for mountain views.
No analysis available
At least one listing (the high-floor 1-bed) explicitly says the unit is 'overlooking downtown and sunset views,' and several remarks emphasize 'city living' and proximity to downtown. While MLS view_descriptions checkboxes may be inconsistent, the explicit remark confirms the building has city-view units; evidence appears across agent remarks (possible copy/paste) but aligns with prior high-confidence data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one public remark explicitly says 'on-site resident manager' and the MLS RESMAN checkbox is set in 3 of 8 current listings. Historical confidence was Medium; while some agents may copy/paste amenities, the explicit remark plus multiple listings checking RESMAN provides reasonable evidence the building has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.