Kaahumanu Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaahumanu Plaza
Building Overview
Kaahumanu Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1973) with a pool and window AC units.
About Kaahumanu Plaza
Kaahumanu Plaza is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
The building offers a pool as an amenity and units are served by window air conditioning. Pets are allowed at Kaahumanu Plaza, and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS information.
Parking is available at the property and is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is not identified in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, management, and any HOA fees or other details with listing agents or association documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupied', 'X% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied' and similar phrases. There are no statements about owner-occupancy percentage, and no current numeric value was provided, so owner_occupancy is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for 'elevator', 'elevators', '4 elevators', 'four elevators' and related terms. There are no statements about the number of elevators, and no current numeric value was provided, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS listings include the OTCOEX checkbox historically, and agent remarks across listings repeatedly state maintenance fees include electricity and broadly cover utilities. While remarks rarely say 'common area electricity' verbatim, the consistent, multi-agent language about utilities strongly indicates common-area electric is included.
No analysis available
All 7 listings explicitly or repeatedly note electricity is included in the maintenance fee (phrases like 'Maintenance fee includes Electric' and 'Maintenance fees cover electricity'), and MLS checkbox data (ELECTR) is present on all current listings, providing strong, consistent evidence.
All 7 listings and agent remarks explicitly list gas as part of the maintenance fee (examples: 'Maintenance fees include ... gas' and 'Electric, water, gas'), so there is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings and agents.
6 of 7 current MLS listings include HOTWAT and several public remarks explicitly state maintenance fees include hot water (e.g., 'Maintenance fees include water, sewer, electricity, hot water, & gas'). The absence of a unit water-heater indicator (WTRHTR) supports that hot water is building-supplied and included.
Agents repeatedly enumerate included utilities (electricity, gas, water, hot water, sewer, basic cable TV) yet never mention internet service. Historical analysis already indicated internet was not included despite occasional MLS checkbox use, suggesting those checks are likely copy/paste errors. Given the detailed utility descriptions omitting internet, it is very likely not part of the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
All 7 listings and several agent remarks explicitly indicate sewer is included in the maintenance fee (phrases like 'water, hot water, and sewer' and 'covers ... sewer'), providing strong corroboration across listings.
All 7 listings and multiple public remarks explicitly list water as included in the maintenance fee (e.g., 'Maintenance fees include water' and 'covering ... water'), giving consistent, high-confidence evidence that water is covered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one remark explicitly states the unit “offers a private lanai,” and 2 of 7 current MLS listings have the patio/deck checkbox (PATDEC/COVPAT) selected. Evidence is limited to a minority of listings and may reflect some agent-level variation or copy/paste, but the explicit mention plus MLS checkboxes indicates the building does offer patio/deck (lanai) amenities for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings check the recreation-area (RECARE) box. Remarks repeatedly mention shared amenities like a 'community pool' and a 'garden plot/community garden' for residents, indicating common recreation space even if not labeled explicitly as a 'recreation area.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings list the TRACHU (trash chute) amenity. Public remarks do not explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, but the consistent checklist across multiple listings and prior high-confidence historical data indicate the building has a trash chute. While agents sometimes copy/paste amenities, the uniform presence across all listings suggests the feature is real.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool: MLS amenities show pool checked on all listings and 6 out of 7 current public remarks explicitly reference it (phrases include "swimming pool", "community pool", "cool off at the pool", and "take a dip in the pool"). Multiple agents independently mention the pool, matching prior high-confidence data, so inclusion is well-supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings include COMLAU in amenities and public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' (e.g., 'community laundry and 1 assigned parking stall'). Evidence is strong and consistent across listings rather than a single isolated mention, so the building is reported to have shared/community laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five listings explicitly describe a parking stall, including phrases like 'large, covered parking stall' and '1 assigned parking stall,' and MLS parking features are present on all 5 listings with no 'NONE' indications. The consistency across multiple listings and different agents indicates building parking is reliably available. Even the one listing that doesn’t mention it in remarks is supported by MLS checkbox data.
Assigned parking is consistently documented: 4 of 7 listing remarks explicitly mention assigned parking ('1 assigned, covered parking stall', 'assigned parking space', '1 assigned parking stall'). Combined with prior MLS checkbox consistency (high confidence), evidence is strong across multiple agents and listings.
Covered parking is supported by 4 of 7 listing remarks explicitly advertising covered stalls ('1 assigned, covered parking stall', '1 covered parking', 'Large, covered parking stall'—appearing in several agent remarks). This aligns with historical MLS entries showing covered parking in multiple listings, so confidence is high.
The listings repeatedly note an assigned/covered parking stall with the unit, but never use deeded/owned language. Without explicit 'deeded' wording, we cannot mark parking as deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'additional parking cost' and found none. There is no information to report a numeric monthly parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar language and found no references. The remarks instead describe an assigned parking stall with the unit, implying no waitlist is mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly notes the unit has 'window A/C' and references an 'Other fee: window A/C appliance charge.' Two other listings describe a $50 maintenance surcharge for A.C. that goes away if the A/C is removed, implying removable unit-level ACs like window units. With 4/6 current MLS entries checking ACWIUN and several remarks aligning, there is strong evidence that some units in this building use window air conditioners.
All 7 current MLS listings for this building indicate concrete construction (CONCRE). Public remarks across the listings do not contradict this (no mentions of alternate construction) and the feature was previously recorded with high confidence, so the consistent MLS checkbox across multiple listings supports keeping construction_concrete = true.
Double-wall construction is weakly supported, appearing in only 1 of 6 listings and never mentioned in remarks, while all listings agree on concrete construction. The pattern strongly suggests a one-off checkbox mistake rather than actual double-wall construction for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings market the unit to investors and note it can be rented or furnished for immediate occupancy, but they do not explicitly state that short-term or vacation rentals are permitted. Absence of explicit STR wording means STR_allowed is set to false.
There is no language indicating the building participates in a hotel rental pool or is managed as part of a hotel program. Because short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation cannot apply.
The remarks contain no indication that owners are required to participate in any rental pool; no mandatory program language appears. With no STR allowance noted, a mandatory hotel pool is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or a 4-digit lease expiry year and found no references. No leasehold/ground lease information is present to extract an expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. There is no evidence the building is VA approved in these remarks.
I searched the remarks for 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance' and similar phrases. The remarks describe included utilities and maintenance fees but do not state the HOA provides full/walls-in insurance, so this is marked false by absence with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE', 'fire safety', 'passed fire inspection', and similar phrases. The public remarks contain no statements indicating the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this field is marked false by absence with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/5) advertise mountain views, and 4/5 MLS entries explicitly state the view as 'None'. Remarks focus on location and amenities without any mountain or Koolau view references, suggesting this building is not marketed for mountain views.
No analysis available
At least one listing (a high-floor 1-bed) explicitly states the unit is 'overlooking downtown and sunset views,' indicating the building offers city/downtown views. 1 of the provided 7 public-remarks mentions city/downtown views; other remarks reference central Honolulu location but not views. Evidence is explicit in agent remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence history, though many listings' view checkbox is unset (possible copy/paste or MLS omission).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox RESMAN appears in 2 of 7 current listings and one public remark explicitly notes an 'on-site resident manager' ("other property perks include on-site resident manager"). Because historical data is absent and only a minority of listings mention it, there is moderate but not definitive support for the building having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.