Ka Makana at Hoakalei
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ka Makana at Hoakalei
Building Overview
Ka Makana at Hoakalei in Ewa — built 2010; features a pool and fitness center, with central air.
About Ka Makana at Hoakalei
Ka Makana at Hoakalei is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2010. According to available records, the building is constructed with a steel frame. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, a fitness center, and a BBQ area. The building has central air conditioning.
Additional details from MLS show covered parking and guest parking are available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided records. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy clues such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not mention ownership mix or occupancy percentages, so there is no basis to estimate a number from the listings. With no current value provided, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevator access," "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators." None of the listings mention elevators, so there is no public-remark evidence to confirm the number of elevators in the building. Because this is a numeric field and no current value was provided, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that cable is included: MLS records show 15 of 20 listings flag CABTV and many agent remarks state phrases like "basic cable/internet" or "Spectrum cable". Multiple different listings explicitly say "maintenance fee includes... cable TV" or "HOA includes cable," indicating consistent confirmation rather than a single copy/paste instance.
Strong historical evidence supports common area electricity being included: 13 of 20 MLS records have OTCOEX. Current remarks consistently describe monthly fees covering community maintenance and amenities, which aligns with building-level common power being included. The evidence looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS support for hot water inclusion: 0 of 20 listings have HOTWAT. Several listings instead mention WTRHTR or unit-owned solar water heaters, which strongly suggests the building does not provide hot water as an included fee item. Current remarks reinforce this as a unit feature, not an association-paid utility.
Internet inclusion is strongly confirmed: 17 of 20 MLS records include INTSER. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'Spectrum Internet,' 'basic cable/Wi-Fi,' or that HOA fees cover internet, showing consistent building-level inclusion. The evidence is repeated across many listings and agents.
No analysis available
Sewer is very well supported by the MLS and the remarks: 15 of 20 listings include SEWER, and several descriptions explicitly say 'sewer' or 'water/sewer' is covered by the fees. The repeated wording across different listings indicates a stable building-level expense inclusion.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed by the listing data: 16 of 20 MLS records include WATER. Remarks repeatedly say fees cover 'water' or 'water/sewer,' matching the MLS pattern and suggesting a building-wide standard rather than agent copy-paste noise. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
There is broad support for BBQ/grilling facilities. Current MLS data shows 13/20 listings with BBQ checked, and multiple remarks explicitly mention "BBQ areas," "BBQs," "gas grills," and "grilles," indicating this is a shared community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Somewhat consistent evidence: about 8 listings refer to a "Swim Club community center" or similar community center/clubhouse language. References are modest in number and often in conjunction with other amenities, so inclusion is supported but with implied-level confidence.
No analysis available
Dog park is consistently supported across the listings. Current MLS data shows 12/20 listings with the dog-park amenity, and many remarks explicitly mention "dog park," "community dog park," and "steps away from the community dog park," making this a clear building/community feature.
No analysis available
Strong evidence for an exercise amenity: current MLS data shows 16/20 listings with the exercise amenity, and remarks repeatedly say "gym," "fitness center," and "exercise room." This appears consistently across many listings, not as a one-off copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Meeting-room evidence is limited but not absent. Current MLS data shows 4/20 listings with the amenity, and one public remark mentions a "rec room," which may indicate a shared community room even though direct "meeting room" wording is rare.
Strong evidence across many listings: well over 15 remarks explicitly mention patio/lanai/deck features, including "covered lanai," "private covered lanai," "upper patio," "back patio with a gazebo," and "private outdoor patio." The consistency across multiple agents and repeated language confirms the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space.
The path/jogging feature is well supported. Current MLS data shows 12/20 listings with the walking/jogging-path amenity, and remarks repeatedly describe a "walking/jogging path" as well as "bike/walking paths," confirming shared access to paths for exercise.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across many listings: well over 16 remarks explicitly mention private yard features, including "secure private yard," "enclosed private yard," "private fenced backyard," and "fully fenced grassy yard." The repeated mentions from multiple listings and agents make this a clear building-level feature.
No analysis available
Moderate support: about 9/20 MLS listings reference recreation-area style amenities and several remarks mention community recreation spaces or the nearby Wai Kai recreation/lifestyle venue. Evidence indicates community recreation areas exist, though descriptions vary and are sometimes conflated with nearby venues.
Moderate evidence: RECROO appears in ~3/20 MLS listings and agent remarks include phrases like "rec room" or "recreation room" in a small number of listings. This suggests a shared recreation room exists but the evidence is not widespread across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak/negative evidence: sauna appears in only ~1/20 MLS listings and there are no agent remarks referencing "sauna" or "steam room" across the provided public remarks. This suggests a sauna is unlikely to be a building-level amenity, though one listing may have checked the box or a rare/isolated facility could exist.
Storage is explicitly referenced in multiple current listings, including "extra storage in hallway attic & garage too," "bonus storage," "two car garage with ample overhead storage," and "additional storage." This is consistent with the prior high-confidence history and appears across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste remark.
The remarks frequently reference nearby surf-related amenities such as the Wai Kai surf wave and lagoon, but there is no indication of dedicated surfboard storage facilities in the building or community. I searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike and surfboard storage and found no relevant mentions. Based on this absence, surfboard storage is assumed to not be provided.
Very strong evidence: many listings (current MLS ~16/20) and repeated agent remarks explicitly cite "tennis courts" or "tennis/pickleball courts" as community amenities, indicating tennis facilities are a consistent shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings (~7) directly mention a hot tub/spa/jacuzzi (phrases such as "hot tub", "jacuzzi", "spa") as part of the community amenities around the Swim Club, providing strong evidence the amenity exists.
Strong building/community-level evidence that a pool is available. The remarks mention it in many listings—roughly 20+ references—with phrases like 'Ka Makana Swim Club pool,' 'community pool,' 'swimming pool,' and 'resort-style pool.' The repeated descriptions across multiple agents align with the high-confidence MLS amenity data, so pool should be included.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for indications of a salt water system, including phrases like "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and "saline pool," but found none. All references describe standard community or resort-style pools without specifying salt water, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available information.
Strong evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Roughly 19 of 20 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions, and multiple remarks explicitly describe it with details such as “washer and dryer located upstairs,” “separate laundry room,” and “front loading laundry upstairs.” The consistency across many listings and agents makes this a high-confidence feature.
No analysis available
Looked for terms like 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or similar indicating payment for shared laundry and found none. All laundry mentions relate to private in-unit appliances, so there is no indication that any community laundry, if present, is paid.
Searched for any references to community or shared laundry on each floor (e.g., 'laundry on every floor', 'community laundry room on each floor') and found none. All laundry references are to in-unit washers/dryers or private laundry rooms, so there is no evidence of community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for assigned parking: 2 of 20 current listings have the assigned parking checkbox, while the remarks mostly discuss garages, guest parking, and a "rare visitor stall." Because the language is not consistently explicit about reserved or deeded stalls, this looks like a feature that may apply to only some units rather than the whole building.
Covered parking is clearly and consistently present in this building. Across the provided listings, nearly every remark references a garage or enclosed garage, and the MLS parking features show 20 of 20 listings with covered/garage indicators. The evidence is strong and repetitive, not just copy-paste noise.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or similar ownership language. The remarks describe garages and guest parking, but they do not explicitly say the parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or separate garage costs and found none. The public remarks discuss garages and visitor parking, but do not mention any additional parking fee.
Moderately strong evidence guest parking is available: 11 of 20 MLS listings historically had the GUEST flag, and the remarks repeatedly note "guest parking nearby", "visitor stall is conveniently located next to the garage", and "plenty of visitor parking", appearing across multiple agent listings (not isolated to a single ad).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or limited parking allocation. Nothing in the remarks suggests a waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
The remarks reference security cameras and a general security system for individual homes, but nothing about a shared card or fob access system for the building or community entries. Searched for terms like key card, fob, electronic access, and card reader and found no matches, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.
No analysis available
The marketing remarks focus heavily on amenities (pool, gym, dog park, etc.) and security-related items like cameras and security systems at the unit level, but do not mention any roving or on-site security patrol service. Searched explicitly for terms such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled with no results, so this is treated as not present given current data.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported by both historical MLS metadata and current listing remarks. At least 15+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention "central AC" or equivalent language, and several note recent replacements or upgrades like "new AC," "replaced the air conditioning unit," and "brand new Trane central AC system." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is strongly supported at the building level. Current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with DOUWAL, matching the prior high-confidence signal. The public remarks do not explicitly discuss construction, but there is no evidence of a change or correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction appears to be a genuine building feature. The MLS data shows 17 of 20 current listings checking STEFRA, which is a strong building-level pattern even though the remarks themselves do not explicitly repeat it. This looks like consistent listing data rather than a one-off agent entry.
Concrete slab foundation is moderately supported by the MLS data. Current listings show 9 of 20 with SLAB, while the remarks are silent on foundation type. This is enough to include as a possible building feature, but the evidence is not as strong as the steel-frame or double-wall signals.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is not supported by the available evidence. Across the current remarks, there are no explicit references to wood framing, while the MLS data shows only 2 of 20 listings with WOOFRA. This appears to be an outlier rather than a reliable building characteristic.
Limited MLS support: 7 of 20 current listings mark 'above ground' construction. Public remarks do not mention above-ground materials or construction details. This is modest, MLS-driven evidence (possible agent checkbox use) so confidence is moderate but not strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental permission language such as STR allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC/TVU, or minimum-stay exceptions and found no affirmative mention. The references to a vacation retreat describe owner use, not permission for short-term rentals, so there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool or managed rental-program references and found none. Also, because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation must be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory participation, must rent, cannot opt out, or required pool membership and found nothing. Since there is no hotel pool program mentioned and no STR evidence, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the listings for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, lease extended, or renewal dates and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence here to identify a lease expiry year, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing and VA loan options across several listings. This is strong public evidence that the building is VA loan approved or at least marketed as VA-eligible for buyers.
Multiple remarks state that monthly HOA or maintenance fees include master insurance, which is the clearest signal of full building insurance / walls-in coverage. This is consistent across the listings and is strong public evidence for the feature. I therefore keep this as true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. None of the remarks include FLSE or fire/life safety pass language, so there is no evidence to mark this as true. In the absence of any current verified value, I am treating it as not confirmed from remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings (at least 3–4 of the 20 concatenated remarks) explicitly reference courtyard or garden areas—quotes include “private courtyard garden with accent garden lighting” and “landscaped indoor garden in the courtyard between the unit and garage.” MLS view_descriptions show 1/20 marked GARDEN, suggesting garden/courtyard views exist for some units rather than being a site-wide feature across all listings; evidence is moderate and appears across multiple agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks are silent on sunset views across the listing set, with no agent descriptions mentioning 'sunset,' 'western exposure,' or similar wording. Although 2/20 current MLS view fields list SUNSET, 13/20 list NONE and the remarks do not corroborate it, suggesting this is likely inconsistent MLS entry rather than a reliable building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar, and none were found. In the absence of any such marketing, it is likely there is no notable fireworks view from this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox appears in 3 of ~20 current listings, but zero public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager' found). Given the feature is new in MLS data and there is no corroborating language across multiple agents' remarks, the evidence suggests the building likely does not offer a resident manager; the checkbox entries appear to be copy/paste mistakes rather than confirmed amenity updates.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.