Ilikai Marina
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ilikai Marina
Building Overview
Ilikai Marina in Waikiki — 1968 concrete high-rise with 256 units, pool, central AC and ocean/Diamond Head views.
About Ilikai Marina
Ilikai Marina is a Waikiki high-rise located in the Hobron-Ena district. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1968, has 18 floors, and contains 256 total units built of concrete.
Based on MLS data, on-site features include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building offers central air conditioning and four elevators. Reported views from the property include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and sunset aspects.
Additional details from MLS show covered parking is available. Pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are permitted. Management is listed as Hawaiian Properties, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details and current policies with the management or listing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy wording such as a percentage, majority owner occupied, or similar descriptions, but found none. Because there is no contrary evidence in the remarks, the current 10% owner-occupancy value should be kept.
The public remarks directly confirm that the building has four elevators. This matches the current value and is strong, explicit evidence from the listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is clearly a building-level feature associated with the maintenance fee for many listings. Remarks mention "central A/C," "central AC is big plus," and fee language covering AC work or submetered AC charges. Evidence is explicit across multiple listings and supports inclusion.
Cable TV appears to be included in the maintenance/HOA structure for many units. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "cable TV/internet" or say the "maintenance fee covers cable and internet," although a few listings note separate charges, suggesting some inconsistency in agent remarks or billing presentation. Overall evidence is strong enough to include the feature.
The building appears to include common-area electricity in the maintenance structure, but the public remarks do not explicitly spell it out. Historical MLS data is fairly supportive (15/20 listings with OTCOEX), yet most remarks mention only unit electric and submetered A/C, which suggests agents may be copying fee details without elaboration.
No analysis available
About 8–12 listings mention electricity as included or note it's billed/invoiced along with the maintenance fee (examples: 'Maintenance fee includes central AC, electricity, hot water, cable and internet', 'Electricity and A/C are sub-metered and invoice every month with maintenance fee'). The evidence is fairly consistent in public remarks but some agent wording about sub-metering introduces ambiguity, so confidence is moderate-high.
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely included in the maintenance fee. Several listings explicitly state that fees cover "hot water," and the MLS history is highly consistent with HOTWAT appearing in most listings. No strong contrary evidence appears in the remarks.
Internet service appears to be included for at least many units in the building. Remarks mention "cable TV/internet" and several listings say the maintenance fee covers internet, though some agents also describe it as separately charged. This is moderately to strongly supported overall.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly say the maintenance fee includes “sewer,” often alongside water, hot water, cable, and internet, and the MLS history is nearly unanimous at 19/20 listings.
Water is included in the building’s maintenance fee. The MLS data is highly consistent at 19/20, and public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like “includes ... water” and “water ... charged with maintenance fee,” making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the Ilikai Marina building offers patios/decks. Dozens of current listing remarks explicitly mention lanais/balconies—phrases include "private lanai", "Juliet lanai", "two lanais", and "covered lanai"—and multiple units note an outdoor lanai off living room and/or bedroom. Historical MLS amenity checks (3/20) plus the pervasive remarks across many agents support a high-confidence conclusion that the building provides patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings include the RECARE amenity flag, and none of the public remarks mention a recreation area (no phrases like 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'amenity deck', or 'recreation space' are present). Given the very sparse MLS flagging and absence in remarks, the evidence for a building recreation area is weak and may be due to agents copying checklist items.
No public remarks across the provided sample mention a recreation/rec/game/multi-purpose room, while only 1 of 20 current MLS listings has the RECROO amenity checked. Evidence indicates the RECROO checkbox is likely erroneous or copy/paste; no corroborating agent remarks were found.
Restaurant evidence is very strong across many listings and appears consistent rather than one-off agent copy. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "two on-site restaurants," "three restaurants downstairs," and dining venues at the base of the building or right downstairs. This strongly supports that Ilikai Marina has on-site restaurant/dining facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current listings checks a building storage/extra storage amenity (STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG). None of the public remarks mention storage lockers, and most remarks only reference closets/cabinets or in-unit storage. Evidence is sparse and appears to be a single-agent checkbox rather than consistent confirmation across listings.
I searched the remarks for any amenity language indicating dedicated surfboard storage. While there are many references to surf spots and beach access, none mention storage for boards. With no evidence found, this is set to false at low confidence.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building amenity based on the current MLS pattern: 16 of 20 listings include TRACHU. Public remarks do not confirm it directly, so this rests primarily on the strong MLS checkbox signal rather than narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched specifically for salt-water pool language such as saltwater, saline, or salt pool. The remarks discuss the building pool only in general terms and do not identify it as salt water. With no supporting evidence, this is set to false at low confidence.
One of 20 current MLS listings includes 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, suggesting at least some units may have in-unit laundry. None of the public remarks explicitly advertise 'washer/dryer in unit' or 'in-unit laundry'; most remarks reference shared facilities. Evidence is therefore limited to a single listing inclusion and appears implied rather than broadly confirmed across agents.
Evidence is overwhelming that Ilikai Marina has shared/community laundry facilities. Multiple listings mention it directly across different remarks, including "common washer/dryer," "laundry room on the 8th floor," and "Washer and dryers are located on the eighth floor," confirming this is a building amenity rather than an in-unit feature. The consistency across many listings suggests this is real, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
I searched the remarks for any indication that the community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. I found references to community laundry and a laundry room, but nothing that confirms it is paid. So this remains unconfirmed and is set to false with low confidence.
I looked for wording like laundry on each floor, every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. The public remarks consistently point to a single community laundry location on the 8th floor instead. That supports false for laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly offered at Ilikai Marina. Across many current listings, multiple agents mention parking in the garage or available for rent, including phrases like "covered parking is available," "parking available for a fee," and "onsite parking garage." The evidence is consistent across listings and appears to be repeated by multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
Out of ~20 listings, only 1 listing's checkbox indicates 'ASSIGN' but ZERO public remarks explicitly say 'assigned', 'deeded' or 'designated stall'. Multiple listings consistently describe 'parking available for rent', '$150/month', 'covered parking', or 'parking services'—language that implies monthly paid parking rather than reserved/deeded stalls. The evidence across many agent remarks points to rental parking (not assigned), though the single MLS ASSIGN flag creates some uncertainty.
Multiple listings explicitly reference covered/garage parking (e.g., "parking is available in the building garage for a fee", "covered parking is available for $150 per month", "monthly, daily and hourly paid parking in the adjacent covered garage"). Several agents independently note garage/covered options, supporting that covered parking is offered in the building.
I looked for language indicating deeded, owned, or included parking, and found the opposite throughout the listings. Parking is repeatedly described as rental parking or paid garage parking, which strongly indicates it is not deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I found repeated, explicit references to a monthly parking charge of $150. This is consistent across multiple listings and is the best-supported parking fee from the remarks.
No listings or public remarks mention dedicated guest/visitor parking. While multiple ads confirm paid resident/garage parking and public parking options, there are zero remarks stating 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking'. Given the absence in remarks and isolated MLS checkbox presence (1/20), guest parking is considered not present.
Evidence for secured parking comes from remarks such as “parking is available in the building’s secure garage for an additional fee,” which indicates controlled/secured access to the garage rather than open, unsecured parking. Additional references to 24-hour security and security patrols, plus one MLS entry with SECENT, point to a pattern of secured parking being part of the building’s offering. While not all agents check the SECENT box, the explicit ‘secure garage’ language provides strong support for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The public remarks consistently say parking is available in the building garage or for rent, which suggests availability rather than a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to card/fob-based access security, including keycard entry and electronic access. The remarks only mention general security and 24-hour security/patrol, not card access. So this remains unconfirmed and is set to false with low confidence.
Security guard service appears to be a real, shared building amenity at Ilikai Marina. Across many listings, agents explicitly mention “24-hour security,” “24/7 security,” “security patrols,” or describe the building as a secure building, which strongly confirms the amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
The remarks clearly and repeatedly reference patrol-based security service. This is separate from the security guard already in the building context and is directly supported by listing language. Confidence is very high.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many current listings confirms Ilikai Marina has central air conditioning. At least a dozen-plus remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases such as "central A/C," "central AC," "central air conditioning," and "maintenance fee includes central AC." This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. The current MLS data is nearly unanimous at 19 of 20 listings showing CONCRE, while the public remarks are silent on material type but consistent with a single building-level profile. This appears to be reliable MLS data rather than copy-paste variation.
Mixed evidence: 5 of 20 current MLS entries list 'DOUWAL' but none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction. Given the partial MLS support but lack of corroborating remarks or owner verification, the feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Limited direct evidence in current listings (only 1 of 20 list 'MASSTU') and no public-remark mentions of masonry or stucco. Because historical confidence was High, the feature is retained but with reduced confidence pending stronger current confirmation or an owner/site verification.
0 of the public remarks mention steel frame construction. CURRENT MLS: 1/20 listings check STEFRA. No historical data confirms steel framing and no agents’ remarks describe steel frame; the lone checkbox appears to be copy/paste/error, so the building is not indicated to have steel-frame construction.
Limited but real MLS support exists for a concrete slab foundation, with 4 of 20 listings showing SLAB. No public remarks explicitly mention a slab or solid concrete foundation, so the evidence is weaker than for construction material and may reflect incomplete MLS entry rather than broad agent confirmation. Still, because foundation is a building-level feature buyers may search for, it remains included at moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited and ambiguous evidence for 'above ground' construction: 8 of 20 MLS entries include 'ABOGRO' while public remarks (many listings) do not explicitly mention above-ground construction. This suggests some units/listings are tagged as above-ground but the signal is inconsistent across agents and could be due to checkbox variability; included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks very clearly and repeatedly state that short-term rentals are allowed. The language includes legal vacation rental, short-term permitted, and resort-zoned references, leaving little doubt.
I searched for hotel rental pool terminology and found none. Since the building allows STR but no hotel pool program is described in the public remarks, this feature should be false.
I looked for words like mandatory, required, cannot opt out, or must participate, and found none. The remarks instead emphasize flexibility and owner use, which is inconsistent with a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or expiry language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or "renewed through" and found none. The remarks instead describe the property as fee simple, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-approval language and found none. Because this feature is determined only from public remarks, I am leaving it as false with low confidence due to lack of evidence.
I looked for wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but nothing in the remarks references insurance coverage. With no evidence either way, this remains unconfirmed from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety approval language such as FLSE passed, fire inspection passed, or life safety compliant, but found none. The only fire-related reference is to future fire safety enhancements, which indicates planned work rather than a completed pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly and consistently supported across the remarks. Numerous listings explicitly describe 'Pacific Ocean views,' 'ocean views,' 'oceanfront,' and 'front-row ocean views,' often paired with marina or harbor views. This looks like broad building-level truth, not a one-off agent copy.
Strong evidence supports mountain views in this building. Current remarks include multiple explicit mentions such as "beautiful mountain view," "partial mountain views," "Koolau mountains," and "mountain and city views." The pattern appears across several agents/listings, not just a single copied remark, so this is reliable building-level evidence.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports city views in this building. Current remarks include phrases like "city lights view that truly shines at night," "peaceful city & mountain views," and "dynamic city... views," showing repeated, explicit confirmation across multiple listings. This looks consistent across different agents and units rather than a one-off MLS copy-paste error.
Moderately strong evidence for coastline views: historical MLS data lists 7 of 20 with COASTL, and current remarks frequently reference coastal landmarks—'Magic Island', 'Ala Moana Beach Park', 'Hilton Hawaiian Village lagoon', 'watch the surf'—indicating views of coastline/shoreline areas. While agents more often say 'ocean' or 'marina', repeated references to these coastal features across listings provide sufficient, consistent evidence to include view_coastline.
Very limited/no explicit evidence for garden/courtyard/landscaped views in the current remarks (only incidental references to 'tropical greenery' of nearby Magic Island, not explicit 'garden view'). Given historical low occurrence and lack of explicit mentions across listings, the building is not characterized as offering garden views.
No analysis available
Marina/harbor views are overwhelmingly confirmed across the listing remarks. Many agents independently use phrases like 'marina views,' 'overlooking Ala Wai Yacht Harbor,' 'boat harbor views,' and 'marina-front,' which strongly supports the feature at the building level. The evidence is broad and consistent rather than isolated copy-paste.
No evidence supports sunrise/eastern exposure in the current remarks. Across the provided listings there are many references to sunsets, ocean, marina, mountain, and city views but zero mentions of "sunrise", "morning sun", or "eastern exposure". Combined with 0/20 MLS SUNRIS checkboxes, confidence is high that the building does not advertise sunrise views.
Sunset views are repeatedly and explicitly described in the public remarks. Listings mention 'sunset vistas,' 'spectacular sunsets,' 'enjoy the sunsets,' and 'front-row sunsets,' often alongside fireworks and western-facing harbor/ocean views. This is strong, recurring evidence from multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
There are repeated direct mentions of fireworks views from units and lanais throughout the remarks. This is strong evidence that the building offers fireworks views from residences, not merely proximity to fireworks. Confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, the building is described multiple times with management language, including "a dedicated site manager" and "site manager." While most listings do not mention management at all, the explicit mention in at least one recent remark aligns with the historical RESMAN flag showing up in 12 of 20 MLS records. Overall this supports that Ilikai Marina has an on-site resident/site manager, even if agents do not consistently mention it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.