Holiday Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Holiday Manor
Building Overview
Holiday Manor in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1966) with ocean and Diamond Head views; pool and resident manager.
About Holiday Manor
Holiday Manor is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1966 and is constructed of concrete. Specific unit counts and floorplan sizes are not provided in the MLS data available.
Based on MLS data, the building’s reported amenities include a pool and a resident manager. Units are noted to have ocean and Diamond Head views. No additional amenities or common area details are listed in the provided records.
Additional details from the MLS indicate parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions, as this summary is based solely on the MLS information provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage such as '80% owner occupied' or a qualitative description like 'majority owner occupied,' but the remarks do not provide one. The 'First Look' and owner-occupant investor language appears to be about offer timing, not the building's occupancy mix.
I searched the remarks for any direct statement about elevator count, such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a numbered elevator reference, but found none. The building is described as a high-rise, yet no listing text confirms how many elevators it has.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows 4 of 20 listings list CABTV in association_fee_includes, but public remarks rarely mention cable being included and one remark explicitly notes 'Cable is separate.' Because a minority of listings claim cable is included, the building should be listed as offering cable-inclusive units, but the evidence is inconsistent across agents and likely reflects unit-level or sporadic inclusion.
About 10 of 20 listings include OTCOEX in the association fee inclusions, suggesting common-area electricity is likely covered. The public remarks are consistent with broad utility-included language, but they do not explicitly name hall/elevator/common-area electric. This is moderate evidence and may reflect copy-paste MLS checkbox data rather than direct agent verification.
No analysis available
Electricity is strongly and repeatedly confirmed across the MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings checked for ELECTR. The remarks reinforce this with phrases like 'includes electricity,' 'all utilities included,' and 'Low Maintenance Fee includes Electricity.' This is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
Hot water is supported by both the MLS history and numerous remarks, including direct statements such as 'includes electricity, hot water, sewer & water' and 'also include electricity and hot water.' While one listing has WTRHTR, the overall evidence still strongly favors hot water being included for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is consistently shown in the MLS data, with 19 of 20 listings checking SEWER. Several remarks explicitly list sewer among the included utilities, matching the historical pattern. This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings and agents.
Water is supported by every MLS record reviewed, with 20 of 20 listings including WATER. The remarks repeatedly confirm it, often alongside electricity, hot water, and sewer. This is the strongest possible evidence and appears stable across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are zero explicit mentions of car wash facilities in the remarks across the listings provided. The repeated amenity pattern centers on pool, community laundry, security, and parking rentals, so the car wash checkbox looks unsupported and likely entered in error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck amenities are strongly supported for Holiday Manor. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention a "small lanai," "open lanai," "private patio," and a "very spacious lanai area," indicating the building offers outdoor space in some units. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are zero explicit mentions of a recreation room or equivalent amenity. Multiple listings consistently describe pool, community laundry, security, and parking, which suggests the RECROO checkbox is likely copy-paste rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage language such as "surfboard storage," "board storage," or "bike and surfboard storage," but found nothing. The remarks discuss laundry, pool, parking, and security, but not surf-related storage facilities.
No analysis available
11 out of 20 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity checkbox, however none of the listings' public remarks mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. The checkbox presence across multiple listings suggests the building might offer a trash chute, but the complete absence in remarks (and potential agent copy/paste) makes this uncertain—recommend owner/manager or site verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is very strong and consistent across the listings. Multiple independent remarks explicitly mention a 'swimming pool,' 'sparkling pool,' or 'private pool,' and the historical MLS data already showed 18/20 listings with pool amenity flags. This is high-confidence building-level amenity evidence, not just a single-unit feature.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit saltwater pool wording such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool," and found none. The building clearly has a pool, but the remarks do not specify the water type.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms Holiday Manor has shared/community laundry facilities. At least 17 of 20 listings include the MLS laundry amenity, and multiple remarks explicitly describe it as 'community laundry,' 'coin operated laundry,' or 'laundry room' on the ground/ lobby level. This looks consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
There is direct public-remark evidence that the laundry is paid. Multiple listings say coin-operated or coin laundry, which clearly indicates a fee-based community laundry setup.
I looked for language such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-specific wording, but found none. The remarks only mention community laundry in general, plus specific locations like the lobby or ground floor.
Parking is consistently described in the remarks as available for rent from the association or building management. Many listings mention it explicitly, including details such as "parking spaces can be rented from the association," "parking is controlled by the AOAO and can be rented on a monthly basis," and specific pricing for open/covered stalls. The evidence is strong across multiple agents and appears to reflect building-level parking access, even when some units have no assigned stall on deed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for deeded, owned, or included parking language and found the opposite. Multiple remarks state parking is rented through the association and that there is no assigned or conveyed stall.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges and found repeated explicit rental pricing. The most consistent fee mentioned is $125 per month, with some listings noting $150 for covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking waitlist or waiting list and found none. The remarks describe parking as rental-based through the AOAO/association and first-come, first-served rather than waitlist-based.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly describe fob/keycard-style entry and secured access. That is strong evidence that the building has card/fob access security.
Security guard service is supported by multiple listing remarks, with about 5+ listings explicitly mentioning "overnight security," "security guard," or "security patrol." One remark gives detail that a guard is "on duty from the evening till the following morning," which is strong direct evidence. The feature appears in more than one agent's remarks, so this is not just a single copy-paste anomaly.
There is direct evidence of patrol/service presence in the remarks. The overnight patrol language and guard-on-duty descriptions support a security patrol feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is very likely concrete construction. Current MLS data shows CONCRE in construction_materials on 16 of 20 listings, which is a strong and consistent signal across multiple listings. The public remarks do not mention construction material directly or suggest any change, so there is no evidence to override the MLS signal.
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS listings list HOLTIL in construction materials, but none of the public remarks across the listings mention 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction'. The limited MLS checkbox frequency suggests a possibility that some units/building portions use hollow tile, but lack of corroborating agent remarks means the evidence is weak and may be copy/paste.
There is no supporting language in the remarks for masonry/stucco construction, and the MLS checkbox appears in only 3 of 20 listings. This looks like isolated or copy-pasted MLS data rather than a reliable building-level feature, so it should be treated as not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some MLS support for above-ground construction, with 7 of 20 listings marked ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground. This appears to be weaker, checkbox-only evidence rather than a clearly confirmed feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for public-remark evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, including NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or hotel-rental language, and found none. There is also no indication of a 30-day minimum rule or other explicit STR allowance language.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program and found none in the remarks. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating required participation in a rental pool, such as mandatory hotel pool or must-rent arrangements, and found none. Since there is no evidence of an STR program, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, or renewal language and found none. The remarks instead repeatedly identify the property as fee simple, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. With no direct evidence, this remains unsupported from the listings.
I searched for insurance coverage wording like 'fully insured,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' and found nothing. The remarks discuss maintenance fees, security, and sprinklers, but not HOA insurance status.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported across many listings. At least 8+ remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinklers,' 'new sprinkler system,' or a 'sprinkler retrofit,' and the language appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copied phrase. This is strong building-level evidence that Holiday Manor has a fire sprinkler system.
I looked for FLSE-specific language such as 'fire/life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' or 'passed fire inspection,' but the remarks do not say that. They do mention fire sprinkler installation, retrofit completion, and a sprinkler-protected building, which indicates safety upgrades but not a documented evaluation pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported for Holiday Manor. Current remarks include phrases like "beautiful mountain views," "windows looking up at Mount Tantalus," "Go Mauka (mtn)," and "breeze coming from mountain" across multiple listings, while MLS data also shows 5/20 current listings with MOUNTA in the view field. This does not look like a one-off copy/paste issue; it appears to be a real view option for some units.
At least 3–4 separate listings' public remarks explicitly reference Diamond Head (phrases include "nice views of Diamond Head", "partial view of Diamond Head", and directions to "walk toward Diamond Head"). Mentions appear in multiple unit listings (including the penthouse), so evidence is explicit across different remarks rather than a single isolated copy/paste; therefore the building is reported as offering Diamond Head views.
City views are strongly supported across the building. MLS data shows 15/20 current listings with CITY in the view descriptions, and remarks explicitly mention "views of the city," "Ala Moana skyline," and similar urban outlooks. The evidence is broad and consistent across many listings, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
Garden views are not well supported by the public remarks. Although 2/20 current MLS listings include GARDEN in the view field, none of the remarks describe garden, courtyard, or landscaped views, which makes the signal weak and possibly copy-pasted MLS data. Based on the available remarks, this feature should not be treated as reliably present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit view language such as seeing fireworks from a lanai, unit, or the building, but found none. The remarks only reference fireworks as a nearby attraction, not as a view amenity.
No analysis available
Resident manager is consistently confirmed in the remarks. Multiple listings mention 'resident manager,' 'on-site residential manager,' or reference the building's 'on-site management office,' which is strong building-level evidence. The repeated mentions across separate listings indicate this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.