
Holiday Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Holiday Manor
Building Overview
Holiday Manor in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1966) with ocean and Diamond Head views; pool and resident manager.

About Holiday Manor
Holiday Manor is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1966 and is constructed of concrete. Specific unit counts and floorplan sizes are not provided in the MLS data available.
Based on MLS data, the building’s reported amenities include a pool and a resident manager. Units are noted to have ocean and Diamond Head views. No additional amenities or common area details are listed in the provided records.
Additional details from the MLS indicate parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions, as this summary is based solely on the MLS information provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy percentages such as '80% owner occupied' or descriptive phrases like 'majority owner occupied' and 'highly owner occupied.' The only related language is the First Look initiative, which distinguishes owner-occupant vs investor offers and does not indicate actual occupancy levels. No usable percentage was provided.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as '1 elevator,' '4 elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' The remarks only confirm that at least one elevator exists, but they do not provide a reliable number. Per numeric-field rules, I am not guessing a count from that wording.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows 4 of 20 listings list CABTV in association_fee_includes, but public remarks rarely mention cable being included and one remark explicitly notes 'Cable is separate.' Because a minority of listings claim cable is included, the building should be listed as offering cable-inclusive units, but the evidence is inconsistent across agents and likely reflects unit-level or sporadic inclusion.
About 10 of 20 listings include OTCOEX, suggesting common-area electricity is likely covered in the maintenance fee. No remarks explicitly spell out 'common electric' or 'building power included,' so the evidence is moderate and may reflect MLS checkbox usage rather than repeated agent description.
No analysis available
Electricity is consistently supported by both MLS data and remarks: 18 of 20 listings include ELECTR, and several descriptions say 'all utilities included,' 'maintenance fee includes electricity,' or 'includes electricity & water.' The evidence is strong and recurring across multiple agents, not a one-off mention.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included based on 13 of 20 MLS records and several clear remarks such as 'includes electricity, hot water, sewer & water' and 'includes electricity and hot water.' While one listing shows WTRHTR, the overall evidence still strongly supports hot water being included building-wide.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very strongly supported: 18 of 20 MLS listings include SEWER, and multiple remarks explicitly list 'sewer' as included in the maintenance fee. The wording is repeated across different listings, indicating this is not just copy-paste noise.
Water is supported by every MLS record reviewed (20/20) and reinforced by repeated public remarks like 'includes electricity & water' and 'all utilities included.' This is extremely strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are zero explicit mentions of car wash facilities. The repeated focus on pool, community laundry, security, and rentable parking, combined with only 3 of 20 MLS listings showing CRWSH, suggests the amenity is not substantiated by building-level evidence and is likely a copy/paste or checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention outdoor space amenities for Holiday Manor, including 'small lanai,' 'open lanai,' 'private patio,' 'patio space to unwind,' and a 'very spacious lanai area.' The evidence appears across many remarks from different listings, which strongly supports that the building offers patio/lanai/deck-type outdoor space for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based support for a recreation room across the listings. Only 1 of 20 MLS entries includes RECROO, and the remarks repeatedly describe pool, laundry, security, and parking but never a rec room or game room, suggesting this amenity is not actually present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for surfboard-specific storage facilities and found no mention of them. With no evidence in the listings, this feature is set to false.
No analysis available
11 out of 20 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity checkbox, however none of the listings' public remarks mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. The checkbox presence across multiple listings suggests the building might offer a trash chute, but the complete absence in remarks (and potential agent copy/paste) makes this uncertain—recommend owner/manager or site verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that Holiday Manor has a pool. Across many listings, agents repeatedly mention "pool," "swimming pool," "sparkling pool," and even "private pool," while the MLS amenities are also overwhelmingly consistent (18/20 recent listings). The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real shared amenity, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for any explicit reference to a saltwater or saline pool and found none. Since the building has a pool but the type is never identified as salt, the feature is set to false based on lack of evidence.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms the building has shared/community laundry facilities. Roughly 15+ listings explicitly mention it, using consistent phrases such as "community laundry," "coin-operated laundry room," and "laundry on the ground floor." This appears to be a genuine building amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
The public remarks clearly describe the community laundry as paid, including "coin operated laundry" and "coin laundry." This is direct evidence that the laundry facility requires payment.
I looked for language such as "laundry on each floor," "every floor," or "floor-by-floor laundry" and found none. Instead, multiple remarks consistently identify the community laundry as being on the ground floor or near the lobby, which supports false.
Parking is consistently described across many remarks as available for rent through the AOAO/association or management. Several listings specify rates like "$125 uncovered / $150 covered" and note it is first-come, first-served, while others say "no parking conveyed" but stalls can be rented. The evidence is strong and repeated across many independent listings, suggesting the MLS checkbox variation is mostly a copy-paste/checkbox inconsistency rather than a lack of parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe parking as rental-based through the AOAO/association rather than owned with the unit. That is strong evidence the parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I found several explicit parking rental prices in the remarks. The most common listed monthly fee is $125, with some listings noting $150 for covered stalls and $110 for open stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "waitlist," "waiting list," and similar phrasing and found none. The remarks instead say parking is available on a first-come, first-served basis or upon availability.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly reference fob/keycard-style access and secured entry. That is strong public-remark evidence that the building has card/fob access security.
No analysis available
I looked for references to patrol, roving security, or a building patrol service. The remarks clearly support active overnight security presence, which fits security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is very likely concrete construction. Current MLS data shows CONCRE in 16 of 20 listings, and there are no public remarks suggesting otherwise. This looks like consistent building-level MLS data rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS listings list HOLTIL in construction materials, but none of the public remarks across the listings mention 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction'. The limited MLS checkbox frequency suggests a possibility that some units/building portions use hollow tile, but lack of corroborating agent remarks means the evidence is weak and may be copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some MLS support for above-ground construction, with 7 of 20 listings marked ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground. This appears to be weaker, checkbox-only evidence rather than a clearly confirmed feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental approval language such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU, and found nothing. There are also no remarks indicating this building operates as a short-term rental property, so STR is not supported by the public remarks.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed rental, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pool references, and found none. Since STR is not supported in the remarks, this must also be false.
I searched for language like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR being allowed and no hotel program references, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly identify the property as fee simple, which means no leasehold expiration year applies. I looked for any leasehold or ground-lease expiration language and found none.
I searched the listings for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. Without any public remark confirming VA eligibility, this remains unsupported.
I searched the public remarks for explicit insurance coverage statements, including full insurance, walls-in coverage, and comprehensive building insurance. Nothing in the listings indicates that the HOA fully insures the building. In the absence of direct language, this is treated as not evidenced in remarks.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings say the building has been 'retrofitted with fire sprinklers,' 'new sprinkler system,' 'newly installed fire sprinklers,' and 'sprinkler retrofit system,' including references to the system being in every unit. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
I searched for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. The listings consistently discuss sprinkler installation and retrofit work, but that is not the same as an explicit passing result. Without a direct remark confirming the evaluation passed, this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3–4 separate listings' public remarks explicitly reference Diamond Head (phrases include "nice views of Diamond Head", "partial view of Diamond Head", and directions to "walk toward Diamond Head"). Mentions appear in multiple unit listings (including the penthouse), so evidence is explicit across different remarks rather than a single isolated copy/paste; therefore the building is reported as offering Diamond Head views.
City views are well supported across the building. Historical MLS data already showed 14 of 20 listings with CITY views, and current remarks continue to confirm this with multiple explicit mentions such as "city views," "the City," and "Ala Moana skyline." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that fireworks can be seen from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks only reference fireworks as a nearby local attraction, not a view from the property, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
Resident manager is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, with phrases like 'on-site residential manager,' 'resident manager,' and references to the association's on-site management office. Combined with current MLS data showing 13 of 20 listings checked, this is strong evidence the building has an on-site/resident manager. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.