Hokulani In Kailua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hokulani In Kailua
Building Overview
Hokulani in Kailua — built 1989; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, management company unknown.
About Hokulani In Kailua
Based on MLS data, Hokulani in Kailua is a condominium building constructed in 1989 located in the Kailua neighborhood. Specific details on building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building has a no-pets policy and short-term rentals are not allowed. No other amenities or on-site features are listed in the MLS data provided.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, common area fees, and the managing company are listed as unknown in the MLS information. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptors across the remarks and found none. Since this is a numeric field and there is no evidence, the percentage remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any direct reference to elevators or lift access and found none. Because there is no explicit evidence in the listings, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention 'cable' or 'cable TV included.' Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings have CABTV checked in association_fee_includes, indicating sparse checkbox usage across agents and little corroborating evidence in agent remarks.
13 of 20 current MLS listings have OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (agents checked 'common area electric'). No public remarks mention 'common area electricity' explicitly. The MLS checkbox prevalence (13/20) implies the maintenance fee often includes common electric, but lack of confirming remarks suggests moderate confidence and possible agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings (0/20) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and 14 of 20 listings include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions. None of the public remarks say 'hot water included'—instead many mention in-unit washer/dryer and unit features. This strongly indicates hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and is not included in HOA maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes. Although public remarks rarely say 'sewer included,' the unanimous MLS checkbox presence and previous high-confidence data support that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All 20 current MLS listings show WATER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks reference reasonable maintenance fees and common utilities generically but don’t contradict water being included; the unanimous MLS checkbox and prior high confidence indicate water is included in HOA fees.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the complex provides shared BBQ facilities. Public remarks explicitly mention 'barbeque area', 'BBQ areas', 'BBQ grills', and 'outside BBQ grill' in numerous listing texts (appearing in at least several different agent write-ups), matching the prior MLS amenity checks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No supporting evidence in any of the provided public remarks for a building car wash (zero mentions of 'car wash'/'auto wash'). Although many MLS records currently have the CRWSH checkbox checked, the absence of any remark-based corroboration and prior low confidence indicate the car wash amenity is likely incorrect in MLS, but there is insufficient definitive evidence (e.g., an MLS checkbox correction or explicit agent note) to assert this with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly mention private lanais and covered patios—phrases include 'covered lanai', 'private lanai', 'covered patio with patio closet', and 'opens onto your own covered patio'. Although the MLS amenity checkbox appears in only 2/20 current listings, at least a dozen separate remark sections describe a lanai/patio, indicating the building does offer patio/deck spaces for buyers searching for outdoor unit amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence for a recreation area: several listing remarks mention a "Playground for children", "grassy area with BBQ grills and picnic tables", and a "gazebo", indicating shared outdoor recreation space (mentioned across multiple listings). MLS also indicates RECARE on some units (9/20), and the remarks corroborate that the property includes common recreation amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and agent remarks indicate storage is offered: 11 of 20 listings include STORAG at the unit level and 3 of 20 list building-level storage in amenities. Remarks explicitly state features like a 'bonus storage closet on the lanai', 'outdoor storage closet on the lanai', 'patio closet', and 'additional storage space', showing storage is regularly included with units (evidence across multiple agents, not isolated to a single copy/paste entry).
I searched for surfboard-specific storage terms and found no evidence of that amenity. Several listings mention general storage closets on the lanai or outdoor storage, but nothing that explicitly supports surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a pool and specifically saltwater/salt pool wording, but found none. The building context also indicates there is no pool, so a saltwater pool is not supported.
All 20 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions and multiple public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry. Representative quotes include 'Full size washer and dryer in unit', 'in-unit washer and dryer', and 'stackable washer/dryer'. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings (likely some agent copy/paste but corroborated by many remarks), so the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating a paid shared laundry setup, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines, and found no references. The repeated in-unit washer/dryer mentions suggest owners rely on private laundry rather than a paid community facility.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording, but found nothing. The listings instead repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support a community laundry amenity.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 16 of 20 current MLS entries flag ASSIGN and numerous remarks say things like 'one assigned covered parking stall', 'designated stall', and 'TWO assigned parking stalls'. Mentions come from multiple listings/agents (not limited to a single copy-paste), supporting a high-confidence building-level feature.
Very strong evidence the building has covered parking: 19 of 20 MLS records indicate covered parking and many public remarks explicitly note 'one covered parking stall', 'covered assigned parking stall', or similar phrasing across multiple listings, confirming the previously high-confidence assessment.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The remarks only describe assigned, covered, designated, or dedicated stalls, which is not enough to पुष्टि deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit monthly parking cost or rental language. The listings discuss assigned parking and guest parking, but they do not state any separate parking fee.
Clear evidence guest parking exists: 14 of 20 MLS entries include guest parking and many public remarks state 'guest parking is also available', 'ample guest parking', or 'visitor parking', with these comments appearing across several different listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, join-waitlist language, or parking allocation delays. None of the listings mention a waitlist process, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks describing card/fob entry or other electronic access systems and found nothing. The only security-related reference is Sentrilock for showings, which is not the same as resident security access.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any mention of patrol service or roving security and found none. The building is described as well-managed with a resident manager, but that does not indicate security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A strong majority of MLS listings (19 of 20) list double-wall construction (DOUWAL), so the building is very likely double-wall. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'double wall', but the consistent checkbox usage across many listings (likely by multiple agents) provides strong evidence to include this feature.
No analysis available
Historically this building was recorded as masonry/stucco. Currently 2 of 20 MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, but none of the provided public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The evidence is limited to a small number of MLS checkboxes and lacks corroborating agent remarks, so inclusion is retained with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list slab foundation (SLAB). No public remarks explicitly say 'concrete slab' or similar, so the evidence is primarily the MLS checkbox majority across listings; confidence is moderate because remarks lack direct confirmation and agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
17 of 20 current MLS listings list wood-frame construction (WOOFRA). No public remarks explicitly describe building construction (no phrases like 'wood frame construction'), so evidence comes primarily from multiple agents' MLS checkbox entries rather than explicit textual confirmation; this appears consistent across listings but may reflect copy/paste checkbox use.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as 'STR allowed,' 'vacation rental,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU,' as well as restrictive language like '30-day minimum' or 'owner-occupant only.' The public remarks provide no evidence either way, so STR allowance is not supported.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel program,' or branded pool participation. The remarks do not reference any such program, and there is no basis to mark this as true.
I searched for terms like 'mandatory hotel pool,' 'must participate,' or 'cannot opt out.' The listings do not mention any required rental pool arrangement, so this is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease expiration wording such as 'lease expires YEAR,' 'ground lease ends,' or renewal/extension dates. The listings confirm leasehold status, but none provide a specific expiry year, so the expiration remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA loan approval or acceptance language and found none. Because there is no positive evidence in the listings, this is treated as not supported by the remarks.
I searched the remarks for statements about HOA insurance coverage, including walls-in or fully insured language, and found no matches. The listings do not provide enough information to confirm full insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar inspection-related certification and found nothing. With no public remark evidence, this feature cannot be confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (10+ references in current remarks) explicitly describe garden/park-like common areas and greenery — phrases include "Gardens, playground, gazebo and park like setting", "grassy area with BBQ grills and picnic tables", and "privacy and greenery". This evidence appears across many agent listings (not just one), matching prior MLS GARDEN flags and supporting inclusion of view_garden = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language like "see fireworks from unit," "watch fireworks from lanai," or similar view-based descriptions. The remarks only reference nearby fireworks events, which is not enough to confirm a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS amenities field lists RESMAN on 17 of 20 current listings, and at least four separate public remarks explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager ('fast-responding Resident Manager', 'Onsite management', 'resident manager'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so we conclude the building has a resident manager with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.