Hokulani In Kailua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hokulani In Kailua
Building Overview
Hokulani in Kailua — built 1989; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, management company unknown.
About Hokulani In Kailua
Based on MLS data, Hokulani in Kailua is a condominium building constructed in 1989 located in the Kailua neighborhood. Specific details on building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building has a no-pets policy and short-term rentals are not allowed. No other amenities or on-site features are listed in the MLS data provided.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, common area fees, and the managing company are listed as unknown in the MLS information. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptors such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," and found no matches. The remarks describe the building as well-maintained and pet-friendly, but they do not provide any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative ownership balance.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," "lift," or descriptions like "multiple elevators" and found none. The listings discuss ground-floor and second-floor units, parking, renovations, and community amenities, but do not indicate how many elevators the building has.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention 'cable' or 'cable TV included.' Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings have CABTV checked in association_fee_includes, indicating sparse checkbox usage across agents and little corroborating evidence in agent remarks.
Fourteen of 20 current listings include OTCOEX, so common-area electricity appears to be included for at least some of the building’s listings. None of the public remarks explicitly call it out, so the evidence is moderate rather than unanimous and may reflect copy/paste MLS checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings show HOTWAT, and many units instead list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks across the listings are silent on any building-supplied hot water, and several mention in-unit water heaters or updated plumbing/appliances instead. This is consistent across the dataset and does not look like a copy-paste inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, which is a high-confidence building-level feature. The public remarks do not explicitly mention sewer, but the unanimous MLS data makes this a very strong inclusion.
All 20 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, making this a high-confidence included fee item. No remarks explicitly state "water included," but the MLS unanimity is strong enough to trust.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported at Hokulani in Kailua. Across the remarks, at least several listings explicitly reference a 'BBQ area,' 'barbeque area,' 'BBQ grills,' or an 'outside BBQ grill,' and the pattern appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copied description. Current MLS data also shows 19/20 listings including BBQ, reinforcing this as a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash service/facilities are not mentioned in the public remarks provided, so there is no direct remark-based confirmation. However, the current MLS data shows CRWSH in 16/20 listings, which suggests the amenity may be a building-level feature even though the remarks look copy-pasted and do not describe it. Confidence is therefore moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Across many listings, agents repeatedly mention 'covered lanai,' 'private lanai,' 'covered patio,' and 'covered patio with patio closet,' indicating this is a real and recurring feature for the building. The remarks are consistent across multiple listings and agents, so the feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence supports a building recreation area/amenity space. Several listings reference a "Playground for children," a "grassy area with BBQ grills and picnic tables," and a "park-like setting" with gazebo, which matches a shared recreation area more than a unit-specific feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is well supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention a storage closet or additional storage, including "bonus storage closet on the lanai," "sizeable storage closet out back," and "outdoor storage closet on the lanai." This appears in several independent listings rather than a single copy-paste remark, aligning with the existing MLS pattern that many units offer storage at the unit level and some listings also show building-level storage/additional storage.
I searched for surfboard storage or related board-storage wording and found no evidence. Some listings mention general storage closets on the lanai, but that is not the same as dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a pool and specifically saltwater/salt pool wording, but found none. Since the current building context says there is no pool, this is strongly supported as false.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building. At least 8+ current listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in unit or stackable/full-size washer and dryer, while the MLS data shows 20/20 listings with washer/dryer included. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be genuine, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
I looked for references to paid laundry such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees and found none. The remarks consistently reference in-unit washer/dryer setups instead of shared paid laundry facilities.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording, but found nothing. The listings mention in-unit washers/dryers and storage closets, which does not indicate community laundry on each floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks mention 'two assigned parking stalls,' 'assigned parking with ample street parking,' 'designated stall,' and 'one assigned covered parking stall,' which is consistent with the MLS history showing ASSIGN in many entries. The evidence appears broad and repeated across different listings rather than a single agent's copy-paste.
Covered parking is very strongly supported across many listings and multiple agents, not just MLS checkboxes. Remarks repeatedly mention "1-covered parking," "covered parking stall," "one covered parking," and even "two rare covered assigned parking stalls," confirming this as a consistent building feature.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking wording such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The listings consistently describe assigned/covered parking, but not deeded ownership of the stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a monthly parking charge, parking rental, or extra parking cost. The remarks only say parking is included, assigned, covered, or available, with no fee disclosed.
Guest parking is well supported by both the MLS data and the listing remarks. Many listings explicitly say "ampl[e] guest parking," "guest parking is also available," or note "guest and street parking," indicating this is a recurring building amenity rather than a one-off agent claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a list for parking. The remarks discuss ample guest parking, street parking, and multiple assigned stalls, but nothing about a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for card/fob access language and found nothing. The only security-adjacent mention is a resident manager, which does not confirm a card-access system.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of patrol service or roving security and found none. The remarks mention a resident manager and maintenance, but not a security patrol program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in several listings, not just implied by the MLS checkbox. I found multiple remarks such as 'cool down with your window AC unit,' 'The window AC keeps you cool,' and 'window A/Cs,' indicating this feature is available in some units in the building. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be genuine rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is very strongly supported for Hokulani in Kailua. The MLS data shows 18 of 20 current listings with DOUWAL, making this the clearest construction feature in the dataset. No remarks suggest a different construction method, so this appears to be a stable building-level attribute.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in a small minority of current MLS records (3 of 20) and was previously recorded with medium confidence. None of the public remarks explicitly mention masonry or stucco, so this looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox data than strong remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list slab foundation (SLAB). No public remarks explicitly say 'concrete slab' or similar, so the evidence is primarily the MLS checkbox majority across listings; confidence is moderate because remarks lack direct confirmation and agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is strongly supported for Hokulani in Kailua. The current MLS data shows 15 of 20 listings with WOOFRA, and none of the public remarks contradict that or suggest a different construction type. This looks like a building-level characteristic rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Above-ground construction is not well supported for Hokulani in Kailua. Only 5 of 20 current listings check ABOGRO, and none of the public remarks mention the building being above ground or use related language. This weak, uneven pattern looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indicators that short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel rental wording. The remarks do not mention any STR permission, so this is not supported by the public remarks.
I searched for any hotel rental pool references or hotel-managed program language and found none. Since the remarks also do not support short-term rental approval, hotel-pool participation must be false.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required rental program participation, or cannot opt out, and found none. Because the listings do not support STR generally and do not mention any rental-pool requirement, this must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for a 4-digit lease expiration year, ground lease end date, or any renewal/extension language. The remarks only say the property is 'leasehold' and that the 'Fee is available for purchase,' so there is no specific expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing accepted,' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Based on the absence of any such mention in the listings, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not supported by the remarks.
I searched for HOA insurance wording like "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," "full insurance," or similar phrases and found nothing. The remarks mention maintenance fees and community upkeep, but do not state that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for language about passing a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, or being life-safety compliant, and found no such wording. The public remarks focus on unit upgrades, maintenance, windows, and resident management, but do not mention fire/life safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports garden/greenery views for this building. Multiple remarks reference 'treetop views,' 'surrounded by greenery,' 'park like setting,' 'gardens,' and 'just privacy and greenery,' which suggests this is a genuine building-level characteristic rather than a one-off agent description. The repeated wording across different listings points to consistent copy/paste of a real feature, not a recent change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no convincing building-level evidence for sunset views. Across the provided remarks, there are no explicit unit descriptions of sunset-facing views or western exposure; the few sunset mentions are generic references to enjoying sunsets at the beach. The MLS view data also reinforces this, with 0/20 listings showing SUNSET and several showing NONE.
No analysis available
I searched for wording showing residents can watch fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building, but found no such mention. The only fireworks reference is to being near local Fourth of July events, which is not the same as having a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Across the listing set, at least 3 public remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'Onsite management' and 'fast-responding Resident Manager,' which is consistent with the MLS RESMAN amenity flag appearing in 16/20 listings. The evidence is strong across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.