Hokulani In Kailua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hokulani In Kailua
Building Overview
Hokulani in Kailua — built 1989; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, management company unknown.
About Hokulani In Kailua
Based on MLS data, Hokulani in Kailua is a condominium building constructed in 1989 located in the Kailua neighborhood. Specific details on building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building has a no-pets policy and short-term rentals are not allowed. No other amenities or on-site features are listed in the MLS data provided.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, common area fees, and the managing company are listed as unknown in the MLS information. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptors like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied,' but none were provided. The note that one unit was sold by the original owner does not describe overall building occupancy, so the percentage remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any explicit elevator references such as 'elevators,' 'lift,' or 'multiple elevators,' and found none. The listings describe ground-floor, second-floor, and stair-free access, but that is not evidence of building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention 'cable' or 'cable TV included.' Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings have CABTV checked in association_fee_includes, indicating sparse checkbox usage across agents and little corroborating evidence in agent remarks.
14 of 20 current MLS listings include OTCOEX/common area electricity, but none of the public remarks explicitly call out common electric or building power included. The pattern suggests this is likely a real building-level fee component, though the evidence appears driven more by MLS checkboxes than by descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings (0/20) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and 14 of 20 listings include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions. None of the public remarks say 'hot water included'—instead many mention in-unit washer/dryer and unit features. This strongly indicates hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and is not included in HOA maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings show SEWER checked in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not explicitly say “sewer included,” but the unanimous MLS data makes this a very high-confidence building feature.
All 20 current MLS listings show WATER included in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not explicitly say “water included,” but the unanimous MLS pattern is strong and consistent across listings.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings that Hokulani in Kailua has shared BBQ/grilling amenities. At least 6+ remarks explicitly mention BBQ-related facilities, including phrases like "barbeque area," "BBQ areas," "community BBQ area," and "outside BBQ grill." This appears to be a real common-area amenity, not a copy-paste MLS checkbox issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No supporting evidence in any of the provided public remarks for a building car wash (zero mentions of 'car wash'/'auto wash'). Although many MLS records currently have the CRWSH checkbox checked, the absence of any remark-based corroboration and prior low confidence indicate the car wash amenity is likely incorrect in MLS, but there is insufficient definitive evidence (e.g., an MLS checkbox correction or explicit agent note) to assert this with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly mention private lanais and covered patios—phrases include 'covered lanai', 'private lanai', 'covered patio with patio closet', and 'opens onto your own covered patio'. Although the MLS amenity checkbox appears in only 2/20 current listings, at least a dozen separate remark sections describe a lanai/patio, indicating the building does offer patio/deck spaces for buyers searching for outdoor unit amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence supports a building recreation area/amenity space. Several listings reference a "Playground for children," a "grassy area with BBQ grills and picnic tables," and a "park-like setting" with gazebo, which matches a shared recreation area more than a unit-specific feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and agent remarks indicate storage is offered: 11 of 20 listings include STORAG at the unit level and 3 of 20 list building-level storage in amenities. Remarks explicitly state features like a 'bonus storage closet on the lanai', 'outdoor storage closet on the lanai', 'patio closet', and 'additional storage space', showing storage is regularly included with units (evidence across multiple agents, not isolated to a single copy/paste entry).
I looked for surfboard-specific storage terms like surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage and found no evidence. Some listings mention general storage closets on the lanai, but that is not the same as dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a pool and specifically saltwater/salt pool wording, but found none. Since the current building context says there is no pool, this is strongly supported as false.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or stacked/stackable washer and dryer, and the MLS data currently shows WASHER/DRYER in inclusions for 20/20 listings. The evidence is consistent across many agents and does not appear to be a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated laundry, or laundry fees, and found no references. The public remarks describe private in-unit laundry appliances rather than a paid community laundry facility.
I searched the remarks for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording, but found nothing. The listings instead mention in-unit washer/dryer or stackable washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 16 of 20 current MLS entries flag ASSIGN and numerous remarks say things like 'one assigned covered parking stall', 'designated stall', and 'TWO assigned parking stalls'. Mentions come from multiple listings/agents (not limited to a single copy-paste), supporting a high-confidence building-level feature.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least 20+ remarks explicitly mention covered parking, covered stalls, or a parking cover renovation, and several agents repeat this detail in different ways, suggesting it is a true building feature rather than a checkbox error. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and time periods, so confidence is very high.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks consistently describe the parking as assigned, covered, or designated, which does not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit parking cost language like "parking fee," "monthly parking charge," or "parking rental." The listings mention covered, assigned, and guest parking, but they do not state any separate monthly parking fee.
Clear evidence guest parking exists: 14 of 20 MLS entries include guest parking and many public remarks state 'guest parking is also available', 'ample guest parking', or 'visitor parking', with these comments appearing across several different listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a list for parking. The listings mention multiple parking stalls and guest parking, but nothing about a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks describing card/fob entry, keycard access, or other electronic access systems and found nothing. The only security-related detail in the remarks is a resident manager, which does not indicate card access.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for patrol-related language such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building, and found none. The property is described as well-managed with a resident manager, but not as having patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in several listings, not just implied by the MLS checkbox. I found multiple remarks such as 'cool down with your window AC unit,' 'The window AC keeps you cool,' and 'window A/Cs,' indicating this feature is available in some units in the building. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be genuine rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
A strong majority of MLS listings (19 of 20) list double-wall construction (DOUWAL), so the building is very likely double-wall. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'double wall', but the consistent checkbox usage across many listings (likely by multiple agents) provides strong evidence to include this feature.
No analysis available
Historically this building was recorded as masonry/stucco. Currently 2 of 20 MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, but none of the provided public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The evidence is limited to a small number of MLS checkboxes and lacks corroborating agent remarks, so inclusion is retained with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list slab foundation (SLAB). No public remarks explicitly say 'concrete slab' or similar, so the evidence is primarily the MLS checkbox majority across listings; confidence is moderate because remarks lack direct confirmation and agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears to be the dominant building construction for Hokulani, with 16 of 20 current MLS listings checking WOOFRA. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'wood frame,' but there is no contradictory evidence and the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is not just copy-paste noise.
Above-ground construction is present in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 20), but no public remarks mention 'above ground construction,' 'above ground building,' or similar phrasing. The evidence is therefore limited and may reflect agent-entered MLS data more than confirmed building facts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indicators that short-term rentals are allowed, including "STR permitted," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU." The remarks do not mention any short-term rental approval, so there is no positive evidence that STRs are allowed.
I searched for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program such as Hilton, Trump, or Ritz pool participation. Nothing in the remarks suggests this building participates in a hotel pool.
I looked for language indicating required participation in a rental pool, such as "mandatory," "must participate," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no such statements, and there is no evidence of any hotel pool program at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease-end wording like "lease expires YEAR," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension date. The remarks only say the unit is leasehold and that the fee is available for purchase, but they do not give a specific expiration year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted" and found none. The listings discuss leasehold status, parking, and renovations, but do not provide any financing approval information.
I searched for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, and found no matches. The remarks focus on unit upgrades, parking, and community amenities, but do not mention insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, or similar certification, and found nothing. The remarks mention renovations, resident manager, and maintenance, but no FLSE or fire-safety compliance statements.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (10+ references in current remarks) explicitly describe garden/park-like common areas and greenery — phrases include "Gardens, playground, gazebo and park like setting", "grassy area with BBQ grills and picnic tables", and "privacy and greenery". This evidence appears across many agent listings (not just one), matching prior MLS GARDEN flags and supporting inclusion of view_garden = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no convincing building-level evidence for sunset views. Across the provided remarks, no listing explicitly describes a sunset-facing unit or western exposure; the only sunset references are generic mentions of enjoying sunsets at nearby beaches or in the neighborhood. MLS view data also does not show SUNSET in any listing, which suggests this is not a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit view language like "watch fireworks from the lanai" or "see fireworks from the unit," but found none. The only fireworks reference is to nearby events, which is not enough to confirm a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported. Two public remarks explicitly say the building has a "Resident Manager" and another notes "Onsite management," while the MLS amenities field currently shows RESMAN in 16 of 20 listings. This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a real building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.