Hokuahi Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hokuahi Apartments
Building Overview
Hokuahi Apartments in Mililani-Waipio (built 1977) with assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Hokuahi Apartments
Based on MLS data, Hokuahi Apartments is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1977. Specific information on the number of units, building size, and construction type is not provided in the available records.
According to available records, key building policies include a prohibition on pets and short-term rentals. Parking is available and assigned to residents. No on-site amenities or additional facilities are documented in the MLS information provided.
Management company and any association fees or maintenance cost details are not listed in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, management contacts, fee schedules, and all building policies with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County records and the state registration both report 4 floors, and listing floor fields and unit numbers reach floor 4 with 24/25 agreement.
The county parcel record and Hawaii state registration independently report 118 residential units; the listing data provides no conflicting unit total.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 850. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator references, including explicit counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No elevator information was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong MLS evidence supports common-area electricity inclusion: 14 of 20 current listings mark OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly mention common electric, but the repeated MLS pattern across multiple listings suggests this is a real building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 20 current listings identify hot water as included, and 16 mention WTRHTR or an individual water heater. Remarks specifically reference a "brand new water heater" and "tankless water heater," supporting correction of any prior assumption that hot water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eighteen of 20 current listings include SEWER in the association fee data, a highly consistent pattern across listings. The remarks contain no contrary statements, so sewer inclusion remains strongly supported even though the feature is not usually quoted explicitly.
Eighteen of 20 current listings identify WATER as included in the association fees, providing strong and consistent evidence across multiple listings. The remarks do not explicitly itemize water fees, but they contain no contradiction to the repeated MLS inclusion data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 20 listing remarks explicitly mentions an on-site recreation room, rec room, game room, entertainment room, or multi-purpose room. Several listings mention access to Mililani Town Association recreation centers, pools, or community programs, but these are broader neighborhood amenities rather than a building feature, so the lone RECROO checkbox appears unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building/community-level evidence for pool access. Multiple listings explicitly mention "7 recreation centers and pools," "community pools," "6 pools," and "swimming pools"—well over 8 separate remarks across different agents. This looks consistent and not like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is overwhelming across the building: at least 10 current remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including full-size washer/dryer and personal washer/dryer in the unit. The repeated confirmations across multiple listings and agents align with the current MLS data showing 17/20 listings with washer/dryer inclusions, supporting a building-level true value rather than a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building, with all 20 current listings containing parking-related MLS features and numerous remarks explicitly describing parking. Multiple agents mention assigned stalls, parking in front of the unit, or one-parking-unit arrangements, so this is not dependent on a single copied remark.
Assigned parking is consistently supported by both MLS data and public remarks, appearing explicitly in approximately 14 listings. Repeated descriptions across different units include "one assigned parking stall," "one assigned parking space," and stalls located near or in front of the unit.
No analysis available
The remarks consistently mention assigned parking, generally one stall per unit, but do not provide evidence of deeded ownership. Because deeded parking is not explicitly stated, this is treated as false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss assigned parking, guest stalls, and street parking. No separate parking fee was found, so there is no evidence of a parking charge.
Guest parking is confirmed by both current MLS data and repeated remarks from multiple listings, with approximately 8 listings explicitly mentioning it. Specific statements such as "15 guest stalls" and "plenty of guest parking spaces" provide strong building-level evidence that visitors have parking available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly describe assigned parking and available guest or street parking. No waitlist language was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 out of 20 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, which suggests some units in the building may have window air conditioning. However, the public remarks do not mention window AC, wall AC, or window units in any listing, so the evidence is only moderate and could reflect checkbox carryover rather than verified building features.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the remarks and prior MLS history. At least one listing explicitly says 'Solid cement Block construction,' which is consistent with the building being concrete/block built. This does not appear to be a one-off copy-paste issue because it aligns with the established historical confidence.
I found no remarks indicating double wall construction across the listings reviewed. The current MLS checkbox activity alone is not enough to establish this feature, so it should not be treated as verified from the public remarks.
None of the 20 listings mention hollow tile. The only explicit construction description is "Solid cement Block construction," suggesting the HOLTIL checkbox may be copied or inaccurate despite appearing in 7/20 MLS records.
One listing explicitly identifies "Solid cement Block construction," while 5/20 MLS records use the MASSTU masonry-and-stucco tag. The evidence supports masonry construction across the building, but the stucco component is primarily supported by MLS data rather than multiple independent remarks.
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence that this building is on a concrete slab foundation. Although some current MLS records have the slab checkbox, the public descriptions do not corroborate it, so this feature is not verified from remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 20 listing remarks mention above-ground construction. With only 3/20 MLS records tagged ABOGRO and no corroborating agent descriptions, the evidence is insufficient to include this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on residential ownership, assigned parking, amenities, and neighborhood access. No evidence supports short-term rental permission, so STR is treated as false.
The property is described as Hokuahi Apartments, a residential community, with no hotel operations or rental-pool references. Because STR is not supported, the hotel-pool feature must also be false.
The remarks contain no indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since there is no evidence of STR or any hotel pool, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for lease expiry dates, land-lease terms, leasehold language, and renewal information. No specific year was found, so the expiry year remains unknown.
Multiple remarks explicitly support VA financing availability for the building. The assumable VA loan and direct VA eligibility statements provide strong evidence.
The remarks were searched for references to full HOA insurance, comprehensive building insurance, fully insured status, or walls-in coverage. No relevant mentions were found.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, was FLSE passed, fire-safety certified, or life-safety compliant. No such statements or denials were found.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden or landscaped views are explicitly mentioned in approximately 9 of 20 listings, including phrases such as "grassy courtyard," "great views of the garden area," "overlook a large green area," and "well-maintained green grass views." Although only 7/20 current MLS records mark GARDEN and 11/20 mark NONE, the repeated detailed remarks from multiple listings and the previously high-confidence history strongly support that the building offers garden/courtyard views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the current listings, sunset views are not supported by the remarks: multiple agents mention grassy courtyard, garden, mountain, or natural-light views, but none explicitly reference sunset, western exposure, or evening-sun exposure. With 11 of 20 MLS view descriptions set to NONE and only one SUNSET tag, the evidence points to this not being a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.