Hillside Terrace 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hillside Terrace 2
Building Overview
Hillside Terrace 2 in Aiea (built 1973); pets and short-term rentals not allowed; management company unknown.
About Hillside Terrace 2
Based on MLS data, Hillside Terrace 2 is a residential building located in Aiea that was built in 1973. The MLS records available do not specify the building's total size (number of units or square footage) or the construction type, so those details should be confirmed with the listing broker or management.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenities, common-area features, or on-site services are specified in the provided MLS information.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association details, and other policies are not included in the MLS data reviewed. Buyers should verify parking, fees, rules, and any other material details with the listing agent or property management. This description is based solely on MLS data and does not constitute an inspection or definitive statement of condition.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings have OTCOEX checked in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is included. None of the public remarks mention building-paid electricity (no explicit phrases like 'common area electricity' or 'building power included'), suggesting agents may be relying on MLS checkboxes. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings but lacks agent remarks or user verification, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/5) show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes while 4 of 5 listings include WTRHTR in unit inclusions, a strong indicator units have their own water heaters. Public remarks do not state 'hot water included.' Multiple listings consistently point to unit water heaters, so hot water being included in fees is very unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes indicating sewer is included in maintenance fees. The public remarks do not reference sewer explicitly, so the evidence relies on multiple MLS entries rather than agent remarks or owner verification. Consistent checkbox usage across listings yields moderate confidence.
4 of 5 listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, indicating water is included in the association fees. Public remarks do not mention 'water included' or similar phrasing, so confirmation is based on multiple MLS entries rather than agent remarks or owner verification. Evidence is consistent but not independently corroborated, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five listings have the clubhouse amenity checked and multiple remarks explicitly reference 'Newtown Rec Center' and 'recreation center that offers classes activities, has swimming pools.' This direct, repeated language across listings provides strong evidence that a clubhouse/community recreation center is available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe outdoor spaces: 4 of 5 public remarks mention decks/patios/lanai (quotes: 'Spacious deck on the ocean side', 'Two usable lanais', 'decks right outside of the primary bedroom', 'rear Trex lanai deck'). Evidence comes from multiple agents across listings and aligns with MLS amenity checkboxes, indicating the building offers patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Majority of listings (4/5) have the recreation-area amenity checked and remarks reference Newtown rec center access and community amenities. While remarks don't explicitly describe an on-site 'recreation area' (e.g., recreation deck), the MLS majority plus references to community amenities support including recreation_area with moderate confidence.
All 5 listings have the RECROO amenity checked in MLS, but none of the public remarks mention a recreation/rec/game room. Evidence relies on MLS checkbox majority (5/5) rather than agent remarks, so inclusion is tentative pending direct confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of five listings explicitly mentions a "storage closet" in the den, and MLS unit_features show STORAG in 1/5 listings while building-level storage amenity is unchecked in all five. This points to limited, unit-level extra storage rather than dedicated building lockers; evidence is modest and comes from a single listing/agent, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is checked in only 1 of 5 listings and no public remarks reference a trash/garbage/refuse chute. Given the lack of corroborating language across multiple agent remarks and the sparse MLS indication, the evidence indicates the building likely does not have a trash chute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list a pool in amenities, but the public remarks contain no explicit statement that the building itself has an on-site pool. One remark only notes the Newtown Rec Center “has swimming pools,” which may indicate community access rather than a building-owned pool. Given the unanimous MLS checkbox but lack of confirming remarks, pool is included with moderate confidence (implied, possible agent copy/paste).
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list "WASHER/DRYER" in the inclusions, indicating in-unit laundry is offered. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer or "in-unit laundry," so the evidence is primarily from the MLS inclusions (consistent across multiple agents) and could reflect agent copy/paste, but the unanimous MLS data gives strong support that some units have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five listings indicate parking in the MLS and every public remark references parking: '1 garage parking and 1 assigned open stall', 'single enclosed garage and another open stall', 'attached garage', 'two-car garage', and '1 car enclosed garage with unit access'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so parking is present for the building.
MLS flags show assigned parking in 3 of 5 listings and remarks corroborate: listings state '1 assigned open stall' and 'one assigned parking space located directly across the unit'. Multiple listings and MLS data consistently indicate assigned/reserved stalls.
All five MLS entries include covered/garage parking and remarks confirm: '1 garage parking', 'single enclosed garage', 'attached garage', 'two-car garage', and '1 car enclosed garage'. Covered parking is clearly available in the building.
There is consistent evidence of assigned/enclosed garage stalls but no explicit statement that parking is deeded/owned with the unit. Therefore set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks describe assigned parking and garage stalls but do not state any parking fee amount or rental; parking fee is unknown (null).
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing and the MLS indicate a tandem stall: remark notes a 'Bonus 3rd parking stall tandem, in front of garage.' This confirms tandem parking exists in at least some units, but it's only referenced once so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No evidence of a parking waitlist system in the public remarks; set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 5 current listings list ACWIUN in the inclusions, indicating some units may have window air conditioners. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'—remarks reference cross-breezes and good ventilation instead—so the evidence is not explicit and may reflect agent checkbox usage or partial-unit features, but is sufficient to include the feature for buyers (confidence moderate).
No analysis available
None of the 5 public remarks mention double-wall construction (no phrases like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction'). Despite 5/5 MLS checkbox entries for DOUWAL, the lack of any remark corroboration and absence of prior confidence indicates the feature is unverified and is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 5 public remarks mention wood frame construction (no phrases like 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction'). Although 4/5 MLS listings currently list WOOFRA, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no historical confidence, so the checklist entries appear to be unverified and the feature is omitted.
None of the 5 public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or similar language. Although 4/5 MLS listings currently include ABOGRO, the absence of any supporting remarks and no historical confidence suggests the MLS checkbox entries are unverified, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not reference short-term rental allowance or rental program; set to false with medium confidence per absence of evidence.
There is no indication the building participates in a hotel rental pool; false and tied to str_allowed being false.
No evidence that any rental program is mandatory; field set to false and contingent on STR not being allowed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks do not indicate this is a leasehold nor provide any lease expiry year. Field is unknown (null) due to no evidence.
Public remarks make no reference to VA loan approval or VA financing. Based on absence of any VA language in the remarks, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly mentions "Pearl Harbor/ocean view" and a "Spacious deck on the ocean side," indicating the building offers ocean-view units. Evidence comes from agent remarks (1/5 listings) describing ocean-facing decks rather than checkbox data, so include the feature for buyers seeking ocean views.
At least one remark explicitly describes a "great mountain" view and mentions an "enclosed patio on the mountain side," supporting that some units have mountain (mauka) views. This is direct agent remark evidence despite absence in checkbox data, so include mountain view.
No analysis available
None of the five remark blocks mention "city," "cityscape," or "downtown" views, and MLS view_descriptions contain no CITY entries. Given the lack of any supporting language across listings, exclude city view for the building.
No analysis available
Two listings reference "landscaped greenbelt" and "beautiful green landscape," providing clear evidence that some units overlook landscaped/garden areas. Despite absence in checkbox data, agent remarks consistently describe greenbelt/courtyard views, so include garden view for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.