Hikino 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hikino 3
Building Overview
Hikino 3 in Waipahu (built 1986) — wood-frame building with window AC and on-site resident manager; assigned parking available.
About Hikino 3
Hikino 3 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1986 and uses wood-frame construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Key features noted in MLS data include a resident manager on site and window air-conditioning units. The records list the management company as unknown; buyers should confirm who currently manages the property if that is important for their decision.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available and assigned, pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted. No information about maintenance fees or other assessments is provided in the data. This description is based on MLS data and buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') across the public remarks and found none. Because this is a numeric percentage and there is no explicit evidence in the remarks or an existing current value, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'lift') and found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no explicit statement in the remarks or a prior current value to preserve, I cannot infer a number and leave the value unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 10 current MLS listings include OTCOEX ("common area electricity"), but none of the public remarks mention it. This is moderate, mixed evidence across multiple agents and could be agent copy/paste; include as possible (buyers may expect common electric in some units) with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings include HOTWAT in the association_fee_includes field, and 5 of 9 specifically include WTRHTR (unit water heaters), strongly suggesting hot water is not a HOA-provided utility. Remarks emphasize low fees and insurance/VA approval but never mention hot water being included despite multiple different agents and listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes and prior reviews showed high confidence for sewer being included. Public remarks do not contradict this. Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, so mark sewer as included with high confidence.
All 10 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes and prior data indicated high confidence that water is included. Public remarks focus on low fees but do not contradict inclusion. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings, so mark water as included with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is offered in this building: 6 of 10 current listings have STORAG in unit_features and 1 of 10 list storage in building amenities. Public remarks explicitly mention "additional storage," and historical MLS entries also frequently flagged storage (previously 5/9 unit_features), indicating consistent evidence across multiple listings rather than a single agent copy/paste.
The remarks reference additional storage and private patios/lanai areas but do not specify any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks reference a swimming pool at a nearby park but do not describe any pool within the Hikino 3 complex itself, and never mention salt water. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches. Based on this, it is most likely that the building does not have a salt water pool.
Multiple listing remarks (appearing across at least 8–10 remark sections) explicitly state in-unit laundry with phrases like "side-by-side washer/dryer," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "new front-loading washer and dryer." The evidence is consistent across several agent write-ups (likely copy-pasted between listings) and aligns with historical MLS checkbox data showing washer/dryer included in all current listings, providing strong confidence that some units have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Listings do not reference any paid or coin/card-operated laundry, instead emphasizing in-unit washer/dryer. Searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', 'paid laundry', and 'laundry fee' with no matches. In the absence of evidence, treated as no paid community laundry facilities.
Remarks reference in-unit washers and dryers but do not mention any shared or community laundry on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'community laundry' and found none. Based on this absence, it is likely there is no community laundry on every floor.
All 10 current MLS listings indicate a parking type and multiple remarks mention on-site parking such as 'parking is conveniently located right in front of the unit' and '1 car assigned uncovered parking stall.' Evidence is strong across multiple agents and listings, confirming the building provides on-site parking.
Assigned parking is documented in 9 of 10 MLS parking_features and appears in multiple remarks: 'one assigned parking stall', '1 car assigned uncovered parking stall', and 'one dedicated parking stall.' This is consistent across listings and agents, supporting that assigned parking is provided.
No analysis available
Remarks consistently reference an assigned/dedicated parking stall and ample guest/nearby street parking, but there is no explicit language indicating the stall is deeded (owned with the unit). Based on the absence of 'deeded' phrasing, parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', and similar; none were found. The remarks mention assigned stalls and guest/ street parking but do not state any paid parking fee.
Multiple remarks across listings mention guest/visitor parking — 'ample guest parking', 'plenty of guest parking', and 'visitor parking stalls' — and 5 of 10 MLS entries list GUEST in parking_features. The evidence implies guest parking is available, though it's somewhat less consistently indicated than assigned parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist' language in the remarks. None found, and the text instead emphasizes assigned stalls and ample guest/street parking, so a waitlist is unlikely based on available remarks.
No analysis available
The public remarks were reviewed for any references to key card access, fob entry, card readers, or electronic access control and none were found. Mentions of a 'security screen door' describe a physical door feature, not a building-wide card/fob system. In the absence of explicit evidence, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for terms such as security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled building and none appeared. There is also no indirect suggestion of an active patrol service. Given this lack of evidence, security patrol is considered not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units have window air conditioning: 9/10 current listings include the ACWIUN inclusion and at least one public remark explicitly states "window AC" (noting it as new in that unit). Multiple agents/ listings consistently list the ACWIUN checkbox and remarks confirm installation, so confidence is high that some units have window AC units.
No analysis available
Historic MLS checkbox data strongly indicates double-wall construction (9 of 10 listings include DOUWAL). None of the current public remarks mention wall construction or any recent structural change that would alter that designation. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and no remarks suggest a correction, so include double-wall construction with high confidence.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in just 2/9 MLS construction-material entries, with no supporting mentions in any of the listing remarks. Given the low frequency and lack of textual confirmation, the weight of evidence suggests the building is not primarily masonry and stucco and those few entries are likely agent mis-selections.
No analysis available
Three of ten current MLS construction_materials entries include SLAB, but there is no mention of 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' in any public remarks across the listings. Given the lack of confirming remarks and absent historical confirmation, the slab designation appears inconsistent and is omitted (low–moderate confidence).
No analysis available
MLS construction materials indicate wood frame on 8/9 current listings, suggesting this is the primary construction type for the project. No public remarks describe any alternative structural system or conflict with wood-frame construction, so the evidence points strongly to building-wide wood frame construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', 'owner-occupant only', and similar phrases. None were present in the public remarks, so STR is assumed not allowed (or at least not advertised) with medium confidence.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', or mentions of hotel brands; none found. Because STR is not indicated, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or notes that owners must enroll in a rental program; nothing was found. With no evidence of a rental program or STR allowance, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', and any four-digit year references for lease extension or expiry. No explicit year or leasehold language was found, so the lease expiry is unknown from these remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly state VA approval and VA-assumable financing, so the building is confirmed VA loan approved. High confidence based on repeated explicit mentions.
Multiple public remarks explicitly state the community is fully insured (e.g., '...BEST of all... FULLY insured!' and repeated mentions of 'fully insured'), supporting a high-confidence true.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements about a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified') and found no references. With no mention and no existing current value, absence of any statement suggests it is not reported—so marked false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 6 of the 10 remark sections) describe a lanai/patio or fenced outdoor lanai and at least 2 listings explicitly use the word "courtyard" (e.g., "cozy private courtyard" and "private patio"). While the MLS view_descriptions field shows 0/10 with GARDEN, the consistent agent remarks indicate the building offers courtyard/garden-style views for some units, so view_garden is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 9 current listings, none mention sunset views or related terms, and 2 explicitly list the view as NONE in MLS data. Public remarks reference a “morning sunrise” with mountain views and, separately, views of Pearl Harbor and the Pacific Ocean, but never sunsets or western exposure. This consistent absence strongly suggests the building is not marketed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. While there are Pearl Harbor/ocean views, there is no explicit statement that fireworks can be seen from the building, so this is set to false in the absence of evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of ten current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity (previously 6 of 9), indicating agents have commonly checked that a resident/on-site manager exists. None of the public remarks across listings mention a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager'), so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based and may reflect copy/paste; moderate confidence (0.70).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.