Hikino 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hikino 2
Building Overview
Hikino 2 in Waipahu, built 1985, wood-frame building with assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Hikino 2
Based on MLS data, Hikino 2 is a wood-frame condominium building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1985. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features reported in MLS include assigned parking availability. The MLS notes that pets are not allowed in the building and that short-term rentals are prohibited. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional specifics such as monthly maintenance fees, utility arrangements, or on-site amenities are not included in the MLS information provided. Buyers should verify parking assignments, policies, fees, and management details with the listing agent or property management. This description is based on MLS data and available records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit percentage statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied') or qualitative phrases ('majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') but found none. With no current numeric value provided and no remarks referencing owner-occupancy, the percentage is unknown and cannot be estimated.
I searched the provided public remarks for explicit references to elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'lift access') but found none. Because no current numeric value was provided in the input and remarks contain no elevator information, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 listings show an 'other common expenses' HOA inclusion and one listing explicitly says 'Management fees include ... common area management.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and unlikely to be a single-agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) indicate hot water is included; 5 of 7 explicitly list WTRHTR (unit water heaters), and no remarks state 'hot water included.' Strong and consistent evidence supports correcting/confirming hot water is not included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most MLS entries (7 of 8) indicate sewer is included in association fees and the listing remarks explicitly state "Management fees include water, sewer, common area management." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent entries and matches prior high-confidence assessments, so sewer-in-fees is retained.
All MLS entries (8 of 8) indicate water is included in association fees and a listing remark explicitly confirms "Management fees include water, sewer, common area management." The consistent checkbox data across listings and the direct remark provide strong evidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building describe unit-level outdoor areas such as a 'private fenced outdoor space,' 'fenced-in yard,' 'Large, low maintenance lanai area with storage,' 'enclosed lanai,' and 'private lanai.' Although only 2/6 listings checked the patio/deck amenity in MLS, the narrative remarks across at least 4 units strongly confirm that lanai/patio-style spaces are available in this complex. This is likely an under-checked MLS amenity rather than an absence of patios/decks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: at least 6 of the current public remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry (phrases include 'full-size washer and dryer', 'full-size side-by-side washer and dryer', and 'in-unit washer/dryer'). These mentions appear across multiple listings/agents (with some repeated text), so the building offers in-unit laundry and buyers searching for this feature should find relevant units here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings include parking features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/ASSIGN etc.) and none list NONE. Remarks across listings reference parking repeatedly (e.g., 'one parking stall', 'plenty of guest and street parking'), indicating the building offers parking and this is consistent across multiple agents/listings.
Five of seven MLS records include ASSIGN in parking_features and several remarks explicitly state assigned/dedicated stalls (notably 'two assigned parking stalls' and other listings noting one or two parking stalls). Evidence comes from both MLS flags and multiple agents' remarks, indicating assigned parking is offered for units in the building.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed'. Listings reference assigned/assigned stalls and two parking stalls in some units, but no statement that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or similar terms; listings only reference assigned or guest parking with no fee amounts or mention of paid parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'join waitlist', or similar language. Listings describe assigned and guest parking and street parking availability, with no indication of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listings’ remarks mention split or ductless A/C systems, despite several describing full or recent renovations where such a feature would typically be advertised. Only one listing has the ACSPL checkbox selected in MLS data, with no corroborating description, suggesting a likely checkbox error rather than a true building amenity. Based on this, split A/C does not appear to be a characteristic feature of units in this building.
Four out of seven current listings list ACWIUN in inclusions (e.g., checkbox checked), but none of the public remarks mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or similar phrases. This is moderate evidence that some units may have window air conditioners (buyers searching for window AC should consider this building), but the absence of remarks across listings suggests the checkboxes could be copy/paste rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
Unanimous recent MLS checkbox data (7/7) indicate double-wall construction and historical data rated this feature High confidence. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, the consistent checkbox usage across all listings provides strong evidence the building has double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most recent MLS checkbox data show 5 of 7 listings selecting wood frame (WOOFRA) and historical assessments rated this feature High confidence. Public remarks for the current listings contain no construction-contradicting language; while agents sometimes copy/paste, the consistency across multiple listings supports inclusion.
Six of seven current MLS listings check above-ground construction and historical confidence was High. Public remarks describe ground-floor townhome-style units and contain no references to below-grade elements, supporting inclusion of above-ground construction as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', or 30-day minimum wording. None of the public remarks indicate STRs are permitted, so STRs are not identified as allowed.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed language. Nothing in the remarks ties the building to a hotel rental pool; because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is also false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. Listings include no such language; since STR is not indicated as allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in' or explicit years; none of the listings mention leasehold tenure or an expiration year.
Several listings explicitly state the complex is VA-approved, indicating VA financing is accepted for units in this building.
The public remarks explicitly describe the complex as 'fully insured,' which indicates comprehensive HOA/building insurance (walls-in) in common MLS language. Because this is an explicit statement in the remarks, the value is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire inspection', or 'life safety compliant' and found no references. In the absence of any explicit statement or current value, the safest assignment is false with medium confidence per the rules.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) mention sunset or western exposure and two listings explicitly list View=NONE. None of the provided public remarks reference sunset views, evening sun, or western-facing views, so there is consistent evidence across multiple agents/listings that the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.