
Hikino 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hikino 2
Building Overview
Hikino 2 in Waipahu, built 1985, wood-frame building with assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.

About Hikino 2
Based on MLS data, Hikino 2 is a wood-frame condominium building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1985. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features reported in MLS include assigned parking availability. The MLS notes that pets are not allowed in the building and that short-term rentals are prohibited. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional specifics such as monthly maintenance fees, utility arrangements, or on-site amenities are not included in the MLS information provided. Buyers should verify parking assignments, policies, fees, and management details with the listing agent or property management. This description is based on MLS data and available records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Remarks reference suitability for first-time homebuyers and investors but do not quantify or characterize the share of owner occupants versus renters. Without a specific percentage or clear descriptor, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these remarks.
The remarks describe unit upgrades, parking, and neighborhood amenities but never reference elevators or lift access. Without explicit statements, the number of elevators in the building cannot be determined from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 6 listings show an 'other common expenses' checkbox in the HOA inclusions, and one remark notes that fees include 'common area management.' While electricity is not named explicitly, the consistent inclusion of common expenses across all listings strongly implies that common-area utilities, including electricity for shared spaces, are paid from the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 6 listings show 'hot water' as an included association fee item, and most explicitly note water heaters (WTRHTR) as unit features, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not centrally provided or included in HOA dues. No remarks across the provided listings claim that hot water is covered by the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water is checked as an association-fee inclusion in every one of the 6 MLS entries, and one listing specifically says 'Management fees include water.' This repeated MLS data plus an explicit remark provide strong, multi-agent evidence that water is included in the building’s maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building describe unit-level outdoor areas such as a 'private fenced outdoor space,' 'fenced-in yard,' 'Large, low maintenance lanai area with storage,' 'enclosed lanai,' and 'private lanai.' Although only 2/6 listings checked the patio/deck amenity in MLS, the narrative remarks across at least 4 units strongly confirm that lanai/patio-style spaces are available in this complex. This is likely an under-checked MLS amenity rather than an absence of patios/decks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry: 6 of 6 listings have washer/dryer in the inclusions, and at least four remarks clearly mention in-unit machines (e.g., 'full-size side-by-side washer and dryer,' 'full-size washer and dryer,' 'FULL WASHER/DRYER,' and 'in-unit washer/dryer'). While a couple of listings don’t restate it in remarks, the consistent MLS inclusions and multiple detailed descriptions from different agents indicate that in-unit laundry is a genuine, building-appropriate feature buyers can expect in some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe dedicated parking for the units, such as 'one parking stall' and 'TWO PARKING', and there is no indication of units without any parking. Remarks also mention 'ample guest parking' and nearby street parking, suggesting robust parking options. With 6/6 MLS entries indicating parking and consistent language across agents, building parking is very well supported.
At least one listing explicitly states 'two assigned parking stalls', and others specify an exact number of stalls per unit (e.g., 'One parking stall', 'TWO PARKING'), which implies designated spaces. With ASSIGN marked in most MLS records plus corroborating phrasing in the remarks, it is clear that the building offers assigned parking for some units. Buyers seeking units with deeded or reserved stalls would find such options in this building.
No analysis available
Parking is described as assigned stalls, but there is no indication that parking is deeded or owned as part of the unit’s title. In the absence of explicit 'deeded/owned' language, parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The listings do not specify any additional monthly cost or rental fee for parking stalls. Since no explicit parking fee amount is provided, this field is left as null.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is described in terms of assigned and guest stalls, with no mention of a waiting list system. The absence of such language suggests there is likely no formal parking waitlist, so this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listings’ remarks mention split or ductless A/C systems, despite several describing full or recent renovations where such a feature would typically be advertised. Only one listing has the ACSPL checkbox selected in MLS data, with no corroborating description, suggesting a likely checkbox error rather than a true building amenity. Based on this, split A/C does not appear to be a characteristic feature of units in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 6 listings report double wall construction with no conflicting descriptions in the remarks. The unanimity across all recent listings provides strong evidence that the building is double-wall constructed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 6 current MLS listings select wood frame construction, with no remarks suggesting any alternative structural type. Given the 1985 townhome construction era and consistency across multiple agents, this is likely a true building characteristic rather than random copy‑paste.
5 of 6 listings mark above ground construction, and remarks describe typical townhome-style units without any below-grade elements. This consistent MLS pattern indicates the building uses above-ground construction materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nothing in the remarks indicates that legal short-term or vacation rentals are specifically allowed, nor is there condo-hotel style wording. With no explicit evidence of STR permissions, str_allowed is set to false by default with medium confidence.
There is no indication that this building operates as or with a hotel or that units participate in a hotel rental program. Given the residential context and lack of STR indications, hotel pool participation is marked false with high confidence.
The remarks do not describe any obligation for owners to join a rental or hotel pool program. With no evidence of such a requirement and no hotel pool present, mandatory pool participation is set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not reference leasehold tenure, ground lease terms, or any expiration/renewal years. Without explicit information, the lease expiry year cannot be determined and is set to null.
Multiple listings clearly state that the building is VA-approved, indicating VA financing is accepted. This is direct evidence from the public remarks, so the status is marked true with high confidence.
The complex is directly described as "fully insured," which typically refers to comprehensive building/HOA coverage. This clear language strongly supports that the building is fully insured by the HOA as of the time of that listing.
No analysis available
Listings do not mention any fire/life safety evaluations, inspections, or compliance certifications. In the absence of explicit remarks, we assume this information is not being promoted and mark it as likely not confirmed/passed from the data available here.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across six recent listings, none mention sunset views or western exposure, and two explicitly have view=NONE in the MLS view field. Public remarks focus on location, parking, and interior upgrades without any reference to views, indicating the building is not known for sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.