Highlands at Waikele
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Highlands at Waikele
Building Overview
Highlands at Waikele in Waipahu (built 1994) — condo community; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.
About Highlands at Waikele
Based on MLS data, Highlands at Waikele is a condominium community located in the Waipahu neighborhood. The property was built in 1994. Size (number of units) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the community explicitly does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The listing data does not provide specific onsite amenities or common-area features; no management company is listed in the MLS information provided.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and other homeowner association rules are not detailed in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building, parking, fee, and policy details with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly mention a 70% owner occupancy rate, so I use that value. This is clear, direct language in the listing remarks, so confidence is high.
I searched all remarks for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators' and found no references. Because there is no explicit number in the remarks and no current numeric value to preserve, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 11 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is included. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included' (agents generally reference amenities but not fee inclusions), so evidence comes almost entirely from repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 11 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes suggesting sewer fees are covered by the association. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly mention 'sewer included' (no agents describe fee inclusions), so the conclusion is driven by repeated MLS checkbox entries rather than remark confirmation.
10 of 11 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes indicating water is included in association fees. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'water included' (the only related remark: 'Water manifold was replaced in 2019'), so the determination is primarily from repeated MLS checkbox entries rather than explicit agent statements.
Although 1/11 MLS entries have the BBQ amenity checked, none of the 11 public remarks mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area. Multiple listings describe community parks, walking paths, and yard space but no shared BBQ facilities; given the lack of any remark evidence and the low/absent historical confidence, the BBQ checkbox appears to be an agent error and is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe outdoor spaces: at least six remark blocks mention 'private courtyard', 'covered lanai', 'private balcony', or 'fully fenced private yard' (quotes include 'private courtyard', 'covered lanai', 'private balcony', 'fully fenced private yard'). While MLS checkboxes show 4/11, the consistent, specific language across several agents suggests the building offers unit-level patios/decks/lanai amenities, so include patio_deck=true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (several of the 11) explicitly mention shared recreational amenities — phrases include 'community parks', 'walking/jogging path', and 'dog park' (e.g., 'community parks', 'walking/jogging paths' and 'car wash, dog park, private yard and walking/jogging path'). These consistent remarks from different listings indicate the building offers common recreation areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions and several agent remarks explicitly note in-unit laundry — examples include "washer and dryer upgraded in 2023" and "washer/ dryer combination appliance." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Every listing mentions parking (11/11). Remarks include phrases like '2 Pkg', 'two parking stalls', and '2Prkg', and MLS parking_features contain parking codes for all current listings, so there is strong, consistent evidence the building has parking.
Assigned parking is indicated in the MLS for 8 of 11 listings and at least three public remarks explicitly state 'assigned' (examples: 'one covered and one open assigned parking stalls', 'Two assigned parking stalls'), so it is very likely the building offers assigned/reserved stalls.
Covered parking is strongly supported by MLS (9/11) and multiple remarks quote covered stalls such as 'two covered side-by-side parking stalls', 'one covered and one open assigned parking stalls', and 'both covered', indicating covered parking is a building feature.
Multiple listings refer to 'assigned' or 'assigned/covered/side-by-side parking stalls', which indicates parking is assigned to units rather than deeded. No remarks state parking is deeded or included in the deed.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar terms. Listings only describe assigned/covered stalls and guest parking; no parking fee amount or rental terms were provided.
MLS shows guest parking checked in 7 of 11 listings; remarks explicitly mention 'extra guest parking for your visitors' in one listing. While many agent remarks omit the term, the MLS prevalence and at least one explicit remark make it likely the building provides guest parking (moderate confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and related phrasing. Remarks describe assigned stalls and guest parking but contain no reference to a waitlist, so treat as not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least some units in the building have split (ductless/mini-split) systems: 3 of 11 current MLS listings have ACSPL checked and one remark explicitly says 'The unit has a dual-zone split AC.' Other remarks note 'brand-new air conditioners' while another mentions 'two window AC units,' showing variation across units but clear evidence that split ACs exist in the building.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 11 listings) mention concrete construction or reinforced concrete. Although 4/11 MLS records list CONCRE, the marketing copy focuses on interior upgrades, flooring, yards, and unit locations (ground/second floor) with no structural material descriptions — suggesting the CONCRE checks are likely copy/paste errors rather than true building-level concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 11 listings) state the building is wood-frame or reference wood-frame construction. Although 6/11 MLS records list WOOFRA, all listings focus on unit upgrades, yards, parking, and floor location; there is no consistent agent language describing wood-frame structural construction, indicating the WOOFRA entries are probably inaccurate.
No public remarks (0 of 11 listings) describe the building as 'above ground' in construction terms; references are to unit level (ground floor/second floor) rather than construction method. Despite 3/11 MLS entries showing ABOGRO, the lack of explicit structural description across multiple agents suggests the ABOGRO checkbox entries are likely incorrect.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', and similar terms. Listings do not address STR policy, so STR allowance is not supported by the remarks and is set to false with medium-low confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', 'managed by hotel', and brand hotel references. None found; because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is set to false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. No such language appears; therefore mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and specific years (e.g., 20xx). No leasehold/lease-expiry language was found, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Previous data indicates VA approval. The current public remarks contain no mention of 'VA approved' or 'VA financing', so kept as true but with low confidence (no corroborating language found in these remarks).
I searched for explicit insurance wording (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') across all remarks and found no statements indicating the HOA provides full/walls‑in coverage. With no evidence, I mark this as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit language such as 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection', and related phrases and found nothing. In the absence of any mention and no current positive indicator, I conservatively mark this as false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 of the 11 current listings explicitly mention mountain views, with phrases such as "Wonderful mountain view," "stunning sunset and mountain views," and "sunsets over the mountains." Although a few listings' view fields show NONE, multiple agents' public remarks independently describe mountain views, so the building should be listed as offering mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 11 public remarks mention a resident/on-site/live-in manager. The MLS checkbox RESMAN is set on only 2 of 11 current listings, suggesting isolated agent checkbox entries rather than a true building feature. Given the absence of any remarks and lack of historical confirmation, the evidence indicates there is not a building resident manager (agents likely copy/pasted the amenity).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.