Highlands at Waikele
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Highlands at Waikele
Building Overview
Highlands at Waikele in Waipahu (built 1994) — condo community; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.
About Highlands at Waikele
Based on MLS data, Highlands at Waikele is a condominium community located in the Waipahu neighborhood. The property was built in 1994. Size (number of units) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the community explicitly does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The listing data does not provide specific onsite amenities or common-area features; no management company is listed in the MLS information provided.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and other homeowner association rules are not detailed in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building, parking, fee, and policy details with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly state the complex 'boasts a 70% owner occupancy rate.' This is direct language in the listing remarks, so the numeric value is used and held with high confidence.
I searched all public remarks for any reference to elevators (singular/plural and spelled-out numbers). There are no references to elevators in the remarks, and no existing numeric value was provided, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 12 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is included. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included,' suggesting the evidence is primarily the repeated MLS checkbox (possible agent copy/paste) rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 12 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes implying sewer is covered by the association. No public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or similar; the support comes from repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings rather than agent remark confirmation.
11 of 12 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes indicating water is included in association fees. Public remarks lack explicit 'water in HOA' language (one remark mentions 'water manifold was replaced in 2019' but not fee inclusion), so the conclusion is primarily based on consistent MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent remarks.
No public remarks (0 listings) mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area, but 2 of 12 current MLS listings have the BBQ checkbox selected. This appears to be agent-entered checkbox data without corroborating remark text, so the feature is possible but not confirmed across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe private outdoor spaces: remarks include phrases like "private courtyard", "fully fenced private yard", "covered lanai", "private balcony", and "back yard". At least 8–10 remark blocks reference a courtyard/lanai/balcony/backyard across different agent listings, indicating building units commonly include patios/decks rather than isolated or erroneous checkbox entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 6 mention recreation-related amenities) explicitly reference shared recreational amenities — phrases include "walking/jogging path", "community parks", "dog park" and "jogging/walking paths" — indicating the building/community offers recreation areas. Mentions come from different listings/agents and consistently describe common-area recreation features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence that the building offers in-unit laundry: MLS inclusions show 12/12 listings list washer/dryer and several agent remarks explicitly state "washer and dryer upgraded in 2023," "newer ... washer, and dryer," and "washer/ dryer combination appliance." Mentions appear across multiple listings and align with historical MLS checkbox data, indicating this is a real feature rather than isolated copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building has parking: nearly every listing mentions two parking stalls (phrases include '2 parking', '2 Pkg', 'two parking stalls'). MLS parking_features consistently indicate parking (OPEN/CO/GARAGE), and remarks across multiple agents confirm stalls in front of/adjacent to units.
Assigned parking is commonly noted: several remarks explicitly say 'two assigned parking stalls', '2 assigned parking spots', and MLS shows ASSIGN checked in the majority of listings. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS data.
Covered parking is well-supported: multiple listings state 'covered side-by-side parking stalls', 'one covered and one open', and 'both covered' for side-by-side stalls. MLS checkbox data also largely indicates covered/garage parking.
Multiple listings mention 'assigned' or 'assigned/covered/side-by-side parking stalls', which implies assigned parking but does not explicitly say parking is deeded. Because 'deeded' is not stated, deeded parking is set to false with low-to-moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking charge', or similar phrases. Listings describe assigned/covered stalls and guest parking but contain no reference to any monthly parking fee amount.
Guest parking appears to be available but less consistently called out: MLS guest-parking is checked on many listings and at least one remark says 'extra guest parking for your visitors'. The support is moderate—present in MLS and mentioned by some agents, but not universally described in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', 'join waitlist' and similar terms. Remarks only reference assigned stalls and guest parking; no waitlist system is mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox history indicates ACSPL was selected on 4 of 12 current listings. Current public remarks explicitly state "The unit has a dual-zone split AC" in one listing and other remarks reference new air conditioners, supporting that some units have split/ductless systems. Evidence combines prior MLS inclusions across agents with an explicit remark confirming the feature, so the building offers split AC in at least some units.
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0 of 12) mention concrete or reinforced concrete. While 5/12 MLS records list CONCRE, the marketing copy provides no corroborating language and strongly suggests agents copied MLS checkbox data rather than describing a concrete building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0 of 12) reference wood-frame construction. Despite 7/12 MLS entries marking WOOFRA, the marketing text does not describe wood-frame construction and evidence points to inconsistent MLS checkbox usage by agents.
None of the public remarks (0 of 12) describe 'above ground' construction—mentions like 'ground-floor unit' refer to unit location, not construction type. The 4/12 MLS ABOGRO checks lack corroborating remarks and appear to be agent checkbox inconsistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', 'NUC', 'transient' etc. Nothing in the public remarks addresses STR policy, so STR allowance is set to false with low-to-moderate confidence (absence of evidence).
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', 'managed by hotel' and brand hotel references. No such language appears; since STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', 'must be in rental program'. No listings mention any rental program or a requirement to participate, and because STR is not indicated as allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', 'lease expiry year', and specific years (e.g., 20xx). No mention of leasehold or lease expiry year was found in the public remarks, so the lease expiry is unknown.
Prior records indicated the building was VA-approved. Current public remarks contain no phrases like 'VA approved' or 'VA financing', so the previous true value is kept with low confidence per the rule to retain existing values when remarks are silent.
I searched all public remarks for explicit insurance wording indicating HOA provides walls-in or full building insurance and found none. With no mention and no prior verification, this is set to false with medium confidence (lack of mention suggests it is unlikely but not proven).
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certifications. There are no mentions, so absent evidence we mark this as false with medium confidence (absence of mention makes it likely but not certain).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listing remarks (4 of ~12) explicitly reference mountain views with phrases such as "serene mountain views," "Wonderful mountain view," "stunning sunset and mountain views," and "sunsets over the mountains." This language appears across several different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste instance, reinforcing that the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data gave high confidence that the building has a resident/on-site manager and 3 of 12 current MLS listings still have the RESMAN amenity checked. However, 0 of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a resident/on-site/live-in manager, suggesting the checkbox may be copy-pasted by agents. Include the feature (buyers may expect a resident manager) but with moderate confidence pending owner/property-manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.