Hidden Valley Ests
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hidden Valley Ests
Building Overview
Hidden Valley Ests in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village — built 1986; assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Hidden Valley Ests
Based on MLS data, Hidden Valley Ests is located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood and was built in 1986. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the property offers assigned parking. No additional building amenities are listed in the MLS data provided. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed at this property per the available MLS information.
Management company and information about monthly fees or maintenance assessments are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, rules, fees, and management details with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks quantify or clearly describe the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no current value to retain, owner_occupancy remains unknown and is left null.
No public remarks reference elevators. Because there is no explicit numeric statement in the remarks and no current numeric value provided, we cannot determine the number of elevators and will not guess.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current listings mark 'other common expenses' (OTCOEX) in the HOA inclusions, which commonly covers common-area electricity. No public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar, so evidence relies mainly on MLS checkbox frequency across multiple listings and may be subject to agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 listings include WTRHTR (units have water heaters) and only 3 of 20 list HOTWAT. No remarks say 'hot water included' or 'hot water in HOA.' The preponderance of WTRHTR entries across listings and absence of remarks indicate hot water is not included in the HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current listings list SEWER as included in association fees, and several public remarks explicitly say 'HOA fees include water and sewer' (e.g., 'Reasonable HOA fees include water and sewer,' 'Affordable HOA fees include water and sewer'). Evidence is consistent and strong across multiple agents.
All 20 listings indicate WATER is included in the HOA fees, and public remarks repeatedly note 'HOA fees include water and sewer.' The consistent checkbox usage and explicit agent remarks provide strong, corroborating evidence.
Across all collected listings, agents consistently describe picnic tables, playgrounds, and grassy areas but never mention BBQs, grills, or a barbecue area. Given that only 3/20 MLS records check a BBQ amenity and one agent stresses there are 'no costly amenities,' the evidence points to the building not having dedicated BBQ facilities and the checked boxes likely being inaccurate MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe the project’s amenities as basic—picnic tables, playgrounds, and grassy areas—with no reference to any car wash or wash station. Combined with an explicit statement that there are 'no costly amenities' and only 3/20 MLS entries checking CRWSH, the evidence strongly supports that the building does not have car wash facilities and that the MLS flags are likely copy-paste mistakes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that the building offers patios/decks: at least 9 separate remarks explicitly reference private outdoor spaces (e.g., "private enclosed patio", "cute small fenced in patio", "44 sqft lanai", "small enclosed balcony", "custom deck extends over the lanai"). Historical MLS checkbox data also previously indicated PATDEC/COVPAT across multiple listings, and current remarks from multiple agents consistently describe patios/lanai rather than a single isolated mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although only 2/20 listings have STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities and 3/20 list STORAG in unit_features, at least 6 separate public remarks explicitly reference storage on the unit or lanai (quotes: "small outside patio area with storage", "44 sqft lanai with additional storage", "storage closet", "courtyard area/storage"). Evidence comes from multiple listing remarks rather than a single agent copying checkboxes, so the building should be considered to offer storage units/lockers or in-unit/lanai storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listings (approximately 15 of 20) explicitly mention in-unit laundry with phrases like 'washer and dryer', 'in-unit washer & space for a dryer', and 'washer/dryer in the unit'. This aligns with prior high-confidence MLS data and appears consistently across different agent remarks rather than being isolated to a single listing, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong consistent evidence across MLS and remarks that Hidden Valley Estates provides on-site parking. MLS checkbox data shows 20/20 listings with parking features (open/covered/garage/assigned, etc.), and numerous listing remarks state '2 open parking stalls', 'two assigned parking stalls', or '2 parking stalls' across multiple agent remarks, indicating building-level parking is reliably available.
Multiple agents consistently state units include assigned/reserved stalls (MLS: 15/20 listings with ASSIGN). Public remarks frequently quote '2 assigned parking stalls', 'reserved parking stalls', or 'deeded parking stalls', showing assigned parking is a building feature offered for units.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe parking as assigned/deeded/reserved (including the phrase 'deeded parking stalls' in at least one remark), so parking is marked deeded with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rent' and similar terms but found none. Because parking is consistently described as assigned/deeded, there's no evidence of a monthly parking fee; value set to null (unknown) with low-medium confidence.
There is good evidence that guest/visitor parking is available: MLS shows 14/20 listings with GUEST and many remarks reference 'guest parking', 'ample guest parking', or 'nearby guest stalls'. Multiple agents mention guest stalls near units, suggesting guest parking is a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', etc., and found no references. With no evidence of a waitlist system, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate MLS-level evidence: 11/20 recent listings have the DOUWAL checkbox checked and historical confidence was previously Medium. No public remarks explicitly reference 'double wall' or similar phrasing, suggesting the indication comes primarily from agent-entered MLS fields (possible copy/paste), so include as a building feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 recent MLS listings for this project explicitly flag SLAB in the construction_materials field, and none mention a different foundation type. Remarks describe ground-floor, single-level units and single-story buildings, which aligns with slab-on-grade construction, though agents do not describe the foundation directly. With no conflicting user or remark evidence, the partial but consistent MLS data supports a slab foundation for the complex.
No analysis available
Strong MLS-level evidence: 18/20 recent listings list WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly describe wall or structural materials (no copy of a contradicting material), so the high prevalence of the MLS checkbox across many agent entries supports including wood-frame construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU/NUC') and found none. Therefore marked STRs as not allowed with medium confidence.
No evidence of hotel rental pool participation in the remarks; since STRs are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is set to false with medium confidence.
No remarks indicate any mandatory hotel/rental-pool requirement; with no STR allowance noted, mandatory pool participation is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly state the lease/lease rent expires in 2040 (including a specific 12/31/2040). Using 2040 as the lease expiry year with high confidence.
I searched all public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. With no mentions, set to false with medium confidence.
One listing explicitly states '100% hurricane insurance with reasonable monthly fees,' which indicates the HOA/building carries comprehensive/walls-in style coverage; this supports marking the building as fully insured with high confidence.
No analysis available
There is no statement in the public remarks indicating the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of any FLSE-related language, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention is interpreted as likely not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 16 of the public remarks explicitly describe garden or park-like views, with phrases such as "all rooms overlook the lush gardens," "lush garden setting," and "view of the large grassy area right outside your front door." Multiple listings reference park-like/landscaped grounds, picnic areas, playgrounds, and units overlooking lush greenery, indicating strong, consistent evidence across different agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
17 of 20 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, but none of the combined public remarks contain phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. This is a strong signal from MLS checkbox data but lacks corroborating language in agent remarks, so inclusion is based on MLS entries with moderate confidence and may reflect checkbox copy/paste rather than confirmed onsite staffing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.