Hawaiian Princess
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hawaiian Princess
Building Overview
Hawaiian Princess in Downtown-Chinatown with pool and ocean/mountain views, built 1980.
About Hawaiian Princess
Hawaiian Princess is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1980. The building is constructed of concrete with a steel frame. Specific information on building size, unit count, or floor count is not provided in the available records.
Key features include on-site amenities such as a pool, a BBQ area, and a security guard. Units report views of the ocean, mountains, and sunsets. Short-term rentals are listed as allowed in the provided data.
Parking is available and guest parking is provided. The property does not allow pets. The management company is not specified in the records supplied. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for a percentage or building-level language such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks provide only unit-specific occupancy information, so the overall owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched for phrases such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators," but none appeared. No numeric elevator value can be determined from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Remarks emphasize 'cooling island breezes,' ceiling fans, and individual 'cooling systems,' implying unit-level, not centrally provided, AC. With only a single MLS checkbox entry and no textual confirmation, central AC being covered by the HOA is very unlikely and that lone checkbox is likely an input error.
Very strong evidence the building includes cable in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings with CABTV checked, and at least one agent remark directly states 'HOA fees include cable.' This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Moderate-to-strong MLS evidence supports common area electricity being included in the fee. 17 of 20 current listings mark OTCOEX, though the public remarks do not explicitly spell out 'common area electricity.' This appears to be a broadly repeated MLS checkbox pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
When agents describe the HOA inclusions in detail, they do not list gas among the covered utilities, even while naming others explicitly. Combined with the fact that most MLS entries leave the gas-included box unchecked, the balance of evidence indicates gas is not included in the maintenance fees and the few checked entries are likely copy/paste or data-entry mistakes.
Evidence strongly points to hot water not being included in the maintenance fee. No current listings mark HOTWAT, and many list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator against building-supplied hot water. No public remarks contradict that pattern.
Internet inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. 18 of 20 current listings mark INTSER, and one remark explicitly names Internet as part of the HOA fees. The repetition suggests this is not just agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Sewer is very clearly included. Current MLS records show 19 of 20 listings with SEWER checked, and the public remarks directly confirm it. This is strong building-level evidence across multiple listings.
Water is very strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings with WATER checked, and multiple remarks explicitly reference HOA fees including water. The evidence is consistent and high confidence.
Strong building-level evidence for BBQ facilities. Current remarks explicitly mention "BBQ area" and "BBQ grills," and the MLS data shows unanimous support at 20/20 listings. This looks like a reliable shared amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although the MLS checkbox history suggests a car wash may have been marked, none of the remarks explicitly mention such a facility. With no public evidence across multiple listings, this looks like a likely checkbox artifact rather than a verified amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found no public mention of a meeting or conference room in the remarks provided. Since the historical MLS signal is relatively weak and the remarks are silent, this feature is not supported by the available evidence.
At least 6–7 listings explicitly reference unit outdoor spaces with terms like “private lanai,” “wraparound lanai,” “balcony,” and “patio,” indicating that lanais/decks are a normal part of this building’s units. One listing notes “nice tile on the lanai,” and another says you can watch turtles and whales “right from your patio,” reinforcing that usable patio/deck areas are present. The consistency across many different units and agents supports treating patio/deck as a building feature buyers can expect here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across these listings, 0 mention a private yard or fenced/enclosed yard, while several explicitly reference private lanais, balconies, or beach access instead. The evidence is weak for a building-level private_yard feature and appears more consistent with MLS checkbox copy/paste than verified amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to have shared recreation amenities, but the wording is somewhat indirect. Several remarks reference "recreation areas" and ping pong, and the MLS data shows 17/20 listings with RECROO. This supports inclusion, though with slightly lower confidence than the more explicitly named amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Across the listings, MLS data frequently shows storage in both amenities and unit features, and one remark explicitly mentions 'your own storage unit for your convenience.' The pattern looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
One listing mentions a generic storage unit, but it does not identify the space as surfboard or board storage. No qualifying surfboard-storage language appears in the remarks.
Tennis facilities are clearly supported by both remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings mention a "tennis court" or "tennis/pickle ball," which aligns with the strong historical pattern. This is a credible shared amenity for the building.
There is no explicit mention of a trash chute in the public remarks. Given the absence of supporting language across the remarks and the fact that this feature is often checkbox-driven in MLS data, it is not verified here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are supported by explicit public remarks. Listings refer to "hot tub" and "Jacuzzi," and the MLS history is consistent enough to confirm the feature. This is a shared amenity buyers could reasonably expect.
Pool is strongly supported across the listing set. At least 3+ current remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, including one listing that says the building "offers pool, hot tub, tennis/pickle ball, BBQ area" and another that lists "swimming pool" among amenities. Combined with the prior MLS checkbox pattern (19/20), this looks like consistent building-level amenity data rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The remarks reference a swimming pool, pool, and hot tub, but do not identify the pool's water type. No saltwater-related wording was found.
Strong evidence the building offers in-unit laundry. Historical MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 18 of 20 listings, and multiple current remarks explicitly say "in-unit washer/dryer" or list "washer, dryer" among upgrades. This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for payment-related laundry terms and shared laundry references. No such evidence was found, while multiple listings mention in-unit washer/dryer appliances.
The remarks were searched for explicit references to community laundry facilities on every floor. None were found; mentions instead include in-unit washers and dryers.
Parking is clearly present for this building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention it directly with phrases like 'one secured parking stall,' '1-parking,' and 'one parking space is unassigned and gated.' The MLS data is also consistent, with 20/20 current listings carrying a parking designation and no listings marked NONE.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings reference parking availability, including “one secured parking stall” and “1-parking,” but provide no language indicating deeded or owned parking. Because deeded status is not explicitly confirmed, it is treated as false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, and additional parking costs. None was found; the monetary amounts mentioned relate to special assessments, not parking.
Current MLS data shows 4/20 listings with GUEST in ParkingFeatures, and no remarks contradict the presence of guest parking. While no public remarks explicitly say 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking,' the repeated MLS checkbox usage across several listings implies the building offers guest parking stalls. Confidence is moderate since evidence comes only from MLS features, not narrative remarks.
Several listings describe secured or gated parking, including phrases like 'one secured parking stall' and 'One parking space is unassigned and gated.' MLS data (SECENT on 9/20 listings) and repeated references to a gated, secured complex indicate that at least some building parking is accessed through secured entry. This makes the building relevant to buyers specifically seeking secured parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned, unassigned, secured, and gated parking but do not describe a waitlist system. There is no public evidence that owners must join a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
The listings support general gated or secured-building access. They do not provide the specific card/fob access evidence required for this feature.
Security-guard service is supported by the MLS checkbox data in 16 of 20 current listings, but the remarks themselves mostly use general terms like 'secured building' and 'gated oceanfront community' rather than explicitly mentioning guards. Because there are no strong remark-based confirmations, this looks like a moderate-confidence building amenity that may be coming from agent-entered MLS data rather than repeated descriptive evidence.
The remarks mention a gated or secured building but do not describe patrol personnel or patrol services. General security language was not treated as evidence of security patrol.
No analysis available
Across 20 recent listings for this building, 0 explicitly mention central air or HVAC in the remarks, and marketing language instead highlights natural breezes and ceiling fans. Only 4/20 MLS entries check a central A/C-related box, which is outweighed by the majority that do not, so this is best interpreted as agents inconsistently checking a feature the building does not have as a true central system.
Evidence for split AC is weak but present: 1 of 20 recent listings includes ACSPL, and one agent noted that the unit's "cooling systems" were recently replaced. No listing explicitly says "split AC" or "mini-split," so this looks more like partial, unit-level evidence than a strongly confirmed building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with CONCRE, and remarks repeatedly mention concrete-associated maintenance like 'spalling' and 'post tension cables.' This looks like consistent MLS reporting rather than a one-off agent note.
There is moderate MLS support for double-wall construction, with 13 of 20 current listings marked DOUWAL. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'double wall' or 'two walls,' so confidence is based on the recurring MLS data rather than direct textual confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence supports steel-frame construction: 15 of 20 current MLS records check STEFRA. There are no direct remark quotes confirming it, so this is driven mainly by the repeated MLS checkbox pattern rather than text descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Short-term rentals are permitted for at least some units in the building, based on multiple listings describing legal NUCs and active legal vacation rentals. Other listings state that units without a NUC are subject to 30-day rental rules, indicating that eligibility may depend on the specific unit or certificate.
The remarks confirm legal vacation rentals for some units but do not describe a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Therefore, public remarks do not support participation in a hotel pool.
The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a rental program or cannot opt out. References to second homes, owner occupancy, and units that were never rentals indicate that hotel-pool participation is not mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly identified as leasehold, with listings stating “lease expiring in 2036” and “Lease expires in 2036.” No later extension or alternate lease-end year was mentioned.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA financing language, including “VA approved,” “VA financing,” and “VA loans accepted.” None was found, so there is no public evidence that the building is VA approved.
I searched for explicit wording such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." One listing mentions "building insurance," but this does not establish full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. The remarks contain no evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple listings explicitly say 'ocean-view condo,' 'unobstructed view of the beach and ocean,' and 'facing the ocean,' and the MLS data shows 20/20 current listings tagged OCEAN. This appears consistent across different agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Mountain views are clearly supported by both remarks and MLS data. The most direct confirmation is the phrase 'mountain views are all around you,' reinforced by the location description at the base of the Waianae Mountain Range. Evidence is strong and appears building-wide for at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are well supported by explicit remarks and MLS tagging. The phrase 'sweeping views of the Waianae coastline' is direct and specific, and multiple listings describe broad beachfront or shoreline outlooks. Evidence is strong across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are explicitly mentioned in at least one listing and supported by MLS tags. The building has enough directional exposure that some units can enjoy morning light or sunrise vistas. Evidence is moderate-to-strong and not limited to a single isolated feature note.
Sunset views are strongly confirmed across many remarks and nearly all current MLS entries. Several agents independently describe sunsets in vivid terms, suggesting this is a consistent and well-known building feature. This is high-confidence evidence.
No analysis available
The remarks describe ocean, beach, sunset, mountain, and coastline views, but do not mention fireworks views. Because the required view-from-the-building language is absent, this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.