Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd
Building Overview
Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd in Waikiki: 1959 concrete building with 28 units, resident manager and assigned parking.
About Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd
Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd is located in Central Waikiki and was built in 1959. The building has five floors, a total of 28 units, and is constructed of concrete. According to available records, the property is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd.
Key features include a resident manager on site, one elevator serving the building, and on-site assigned parking. Units are equipped with split and window air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS data.
Additional details from the MLS indicate assigned parking is available. Potential buyers should verify all information, including fees, specific unit features, and current management policies, as this summary is based on MLS data and may not reflect recent changes.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
MLS listings reach floor 5, with strong floor-field and unit-number agreement, and include penthouse unit 501. The county max_floors of 4 is set aside because it can lag the numbered top residential floor.
The county's reconciled_units and residential CPR both report 56 units, supporting the stored value. The county dwell_sum of 52 is a differing county measure and is set aside because reconciled_units is the preferred figure.
The public remarks contain unit-specific occupancy statements but do not state a percentage or building-wide owner-occupancy rate. The current value of 15% is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.
Public remarks consistently confirm that the building has an elevator, but none state a different number or mention multiple elevators. The current value of 1 is therefore supported with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (MLS shows CABTV checked on 18/20) and the public remarks explicitly state 'monthly maintenance fee of $413.23 covers ... cable TV,' showing consistent agent language that cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. Evidence appears across agents and is directly stated in the remarks.
Remarks explicitly state the monthly maintenance fee 'covers ... common area maintenance' and several listings/MLS checkboxes reference common area inclusion. The statement is explicit in the public remarks and appears consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not consistently supported: only 3 of 20 current listings check HOTWAT, while 7 of 20 identify an in-unit water heater. Remarks include “a tankless water heater” and “water heater,” confirming that at least some units have their own heaters rather than building-supplied hot water included in fees.
The public remarks explicitly list 'internet' as covered by the monthly maintenance fee and MLS checkboxes frequently include INTSER (14/20). This direct statement in the remarks across listings supports inclusion of internet in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the building, with 17 of 20 current listings listing SEWER in the association fee inclusions. The detailed fee statement explicitly says the monthly maintenance fee “covers water, sewer, garbage,” providing direct confirmation beyond checkbox data.
Water inclusion is very strongly supported, appearing in 18 of 20 current MLS records. The explicit remark that the maintenance fee “covers water, sewer, garbage” confirms the checkbox data and indicates this is a building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention a car wash facility, and the feature appears in only 1 of 20 MLS amenity records. Because the single checkbox is not supported by remarks or repeated across multiple agents, it is likely a copy/paste or data-entry error; the building should not be identified as offering a car wash.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings repeatedly reference lanai/outdoor space—phrases include "open lanai", "Private lanai", and "brand-new lanai and sliding glass doors." Although only 6/20 checkboxes currently indicate PATDEC/COVPAT, the consistent, agent-authored remarks across many listings provide strong evidence the building offers patios/decks (lanais) on some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Repeated listings directly identify surfboard storage as a building amenity. The explicit and repeated references provide strong evidence that this feature is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not describe any pool amenity or saltwater pool. The current building context specifies pool=false, and nothing in the remarks contradicts that.
At least 15 current or recent listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including "stackable washer/dryer," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "washer and dryer placed in the unit." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, and it is consistent with the historical 20/20 MLS inclusion record rather than appearing to be a checkbox-only or copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
The listings describe private in-unit laundry rather than shared laundry facilities. References to paid nearby parking do not indicate paid laundry.
The remarks consistently describe in-unit washers and dryers, including a "stackable washer/dryer" and "washer/dryer in unit." No public remark identifies community laundry facilities on every floor.
At least 9 listings explicitly mention parking, including phrases such as "parking is available to rent from the co-op board on a first-come, first-served basis," "onsite parking (waitlist)," and "Parking is rented ... for $75/month." Although 17 of 20 current MLS records show NONE, the repeated building-level remarks across multiple listings strongly establish that parking exists, subject to availability or a waitlist; some wording appears copied across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is not deeded or included with the unit. Available spaces are board-managed rental spaces, and some units have no included parking.
No analysis available
The recurring parking rental fee is approximately $75 per month. Parking is separate from the unit and rented through the co-op board.
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS entries list SECENT for parking. Multiple agent remarks describe a "secured building," "keyed entry," and "secured entrance" and mention on-site management and cameras, but no remarks explicitly state gated or card-access parking. The evidence suggests some form of controlled access related to the building and possibly parking (hence included), but it is implied rather than clearly documented across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has a waitlist for onsite parking managed by the site manager or co-op board. Parking is generally allocated on a first-come, first-served basis, with nearby paid alternatives also mentioned.
No analysis available
The building appears to have controlled or secured entry, but the remarks do not establish a card- or fob-based security system. Camera and surveillance references are not evidence of card access.
No analysis available
The remarks mention an on-site manager, cameras, surveillance, and a secured building. None describe a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window or wall air conditioning is clearly available in the building. Approximately 9 current remarks explicitly mention the feature, including “bedroom A/C,” “BrandNew AC unit wall,” “A/C window unit,” and “window air conditioner in the bedroom”; this aligns with both historical and current MLS checkbox data across many listings, making the evidence strong and not limited to a single copy-pasted remark.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by MLS data: 18 of 20 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials field, consistent with the previously high-confidence determination. Public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete, but the repeated reporting across many listings indicates the feature applies to the building.
Low representation in MLS (4/20) and no remarks explicitly state double-wall construction; multiple listings reference double-pane windows but not double-wall. Given the weak MLS signal and absence in the public remarks, the building is reported here as not having double-wall construction.
Five of 20 current listings identify HOLTIL, but no public remarks mention hollow tile construction. Given the prior low confidence and lack of corroboration across listing remarks, hollow tile should be omitted rather than treated as a validated building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sparse MLS indication (5/20) and no public remarks referring to 'above ground' construction. With no supporting descriptive evidence across agent remarks, the feature is omitted as not present for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The repeated 30-day minimum rental restriction indicates that short-term rentals are not allowed. Although some remarks describe investment or vacation-use potential, none establishes permission for rentals shorter than 30 days.
There is no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because short-term rentals are not allowed, this feature must be false.
The listings provide no evidence of a mandatory rental pool or required hotel program. The 30-day minimum rental restriction and absence of any hotel-pool language support a false value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is repeatedly identified as a leasehold co-op with the ground lease expiring in 2040. No later renewal or extension year is mentioned.
The listings consistently indicate that financing is unavailable, so VA financing is not supported. No listing mentions VA approval or VA loans being accepted.
The remarks were searched for building insurance and walls-in coverage terminology. Nothing indicates that the HOA provides full insurance, so the feature is recorded as false with low-to-medium confidence based on absence of evidence.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, certification, compliance, and fire inspection language. No supporting or opposing evidence was found, so this feature is recorded as false with low-to-medium confidence based on absence of mention.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 20 listings explicitly mentions a "partial mountain view." Additionally, 5 of 20 current MLS listings contain MOUNTA in their view descriptions, though 11 list NONE, indicating the view is unit-specific rather than universal. The direct remark provides legitimate confirmation despite limited mention across listings.
No analysis available
Six of 20 current MLS listings (6/20) indicate a city view, but the consolidated public remarks for the building do not explicitly state 'city view' or 'downtown view.' Multiple listings checking the box suggests some units may offer city vistas, but the evidence is inconsistent and likely includes agent copy/paste, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
One listing (1/20) in the current MLS dataset lists a garden view, but none of the public remarks mention garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. With only a single MLS flag and no corroborating remarks, garden view availability is possible but uncertain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 20 listings mention sunset views, evening sun, western exposure, or Friday night fireworks. The repeated remarks appear focused on Waikiki proximity and unit features, with no evidence from multiple agents that the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
The remarks mention Waikiki, beach proximity, lanai spaces, and mountain views, but do not describe a Friday night fireworks view from the property. Location near Waikiki is not sufficient evidence of a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager: at least 8 separate remark blocks explicitly state phrases like 'on-site manager', 'building includes an on-site manager', or 'secured building with cameras and on-site manager'. This is consistent with MLS checkbox data (RESMAN checked on 14/20 listings) and appears repeatedly across listings (some likely copy/paste), indicating the building offers an on-site manager.
No analysis available
The building is consistently described as a cooperative leasehold property across numerous listings, with at least 8 explicit remarks using terms such as 'co-op property,' 'co-op/Leasehold,' and 'cooperative LEASEHOLD building.' This strongly confirms the historical high-confidence classification and is supported by the current COOTAX indicator in 12 of 20 listings.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.