Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd
Building Overview
Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd in Waikiki: 1959 concrete building with 28 units, resident manager and assigned parking.
About Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd
Hawaiian Prince Apts Ltd is located in Central Waikiki and was built in 1959. The building has five floors, a total of 28 units, and is constructed of concrete. According to available records, the property is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd.
Key features include a resident manager on site, one elevator serving the building, and on-site assigned parking. Units are equipped with split and window air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS data.
Additional details from the MLS indicate assigned parking is available. Potential buyers should verify all information, including fees, specific unit features, and current management policies, as this summary is based on MLS data and may not reflect recent changes.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings reference specific units as owner-occupied, but no remark gives a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage. Per the rules, the existing value (15.00) is retained but with low confidence because there is no explicit percentage stated in the remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly reference an elevator in the building. They do not state a numeric count beyond the singular term, but the repeated mentions support the current value of 1 elevator.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (MLS shows CABTV checked on 18/20) and the public remarks explicitly state 'monthly maintenance fee of $413.23 covers ... cable TV,' showing consistent agent language that cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. Evidence appears across agents and is directly stated in the remarks.
Remarks explicitly state the monthly maintenance fee 'covers ... common area maintenance' and several listings/MLS checkboxes reference common area inclusion. The statement is explicit in the public remarks and appears consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference in-unit water heaters or tankless units (several occurrences across the remarks), while HOTWAT is almost never checked in MLS (2/20). Given the recurring in-unit water heater language and low HOTWAT checks, evidence supports that hot water is not included in the HOA fees.
The public remarks explicitly list 'internet' as covered by the monthly maintenance fee and MLS checkboxes frequently include INTSER (14/20). This direct statement in the remarks across listings supports inclusion of internet in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
High consistency between MLS checkboxes (18/20) and explicit remark language 'monthly maintenance fee ... covers water, sewer, garbage' indicates sewer service is included in the HOA fee. Evidence is explicit and consistent across listings.
The public remarks directly state 'monthly maintenance fee ... covers water,' and MLS checkbox frequency (19/20) corroborates this. Despite in-unit water heaters being noted for hot water, the building-level water (meter/service) is consistently described as included in the HOA fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings repeatedly reference lanai/outdoor space—phrases include "open lanai", "Private lanai", and "brand-new lanai and sliding glass doors." Although only 6/20 checkboxes currently indicate PATDEC/COVPAT, the consistent, agent-authored remarks across many listings provide strong evidence the building offers patios/decks (lanais) on some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several public remarks explicitly mention surfboard storage (and bike storage) as a building amenity. This direct language supports marking surfboard storage as present with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'pool', 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', and similar terms and found no references. The building context also indicates no pool, so 'salt pool' is not supported by the remarks.
Every recent MLS listing for this building lists washer/dryer in the inclusions (20/20) and numerous public remarks explicitly say "in-unit stacked washer and dryer", "stackable washer/dryer", or "washer/dryer in unit." The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents (likely some copy/paste), providing strong support that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'card operated', 'quarters', and 'paid laundry' and found none. All laundry references describe in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. Multiple listings repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer instead, indicating no evidence of community laundry on each floor.
Multiple listings (many agent remarks) explicitly state "parking is available to rent from the co-op board on a first-come, first-served basis," "onsite parking (waitlist)," or similar, with several noting ~$75/month. While MLS parking checkboxes are often unchecked (likely copy/paste errors), the repeated remarks from different listings provide strong evidence the building provides parking via the co-op board/waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All public remarks describe parking as rented/managed by the co-op board on a first-come, first-served/waitlist basis rather than being deeded. No listings indicate parking is included in the deed.
No analysis available
Public remarks consistently cite approximately $75/month for co-op board rented parking. This monthly fee is explicitly mentioned in several listings.
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS entries list SECENT for parking. Multiple agent remarks describe a "secured building," "keyed entry," and "secured entrance" and mention on-site management and cameras, but no remarks explicitly state gated or card-access parking. The evidence suggests some form of controlled access related to the building and possibly parking (hence included), but it is implied rather than clearly documented across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe a waitlist/first-come, first-served system managed by the co-op board for onsite parking. The presence of a waitlist is explicitly mentioned.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card access', and 'card reader' and found none. The building is described as having keyed entry and surveillance cameras, which does not confirm card/fob access.
No analysis available
I searched for 'security patrol', 'patrol service', and similar phrases and found no mentions. Listings repeatedly cite an on-site manager and surveillance cameras but do not indicate a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both historical MLS checkbox data (16/20 listings with ACWIUN) and current remarks support that units in this building have window/wall air conditioning. At least 10 distinct remark sections explicitly mention terms like “A/C window unit,” “window air conditioner in the bedroom,” or “bedroom A/C,” appearing across multiple agent listings rather than a single copy/paste source, so evidence is strong that some units offer window AC.
Strong MLS consensus: 19 of 20 current listings indicate concrete construction. Public remarks do not explicitly state construction material but also do not contradict concrete; evidence is strong across multiple listings (likely accurate MLS checkbox data).
Low representation in MLS (4/20) and no remarks explicitly state double-wall construction; multiple listings reference double-pane windows but not double-wall. Given the weak MLS signal and absence in the public remarks, the building is reported here as not having double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sparse MLS indication (5/20) and no public remarks referring to 'above ground' construction. With no supporting descriptive evidence across agent remarks, the feature is omitted as not present for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings consistently specify a 30-day minimum rental period, which precludes short-term (nightly) rentals. No remarks indicate short-term/vacation rentals or an STR policy allowing nightly stays.
There is no indication of participation in any hotel rental pool program in the public remarks. Because short-term rentals are not allowed (30-day minimum), hotel pool participation would not be applicable.
No public remarks indicate mandatory participation in a hotel or centralized rental program, and with STRs prohibited by the 30-day minimum, mandatory pool participation is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference the ground lease ending on March 31, 2040. Use the explicit expiry date mentioned in the public remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly state cash purchase only and that fee/financing is not available, and there are no public remarks indicating VA approval or acceptance of VA loans. Based on these explicit financing restrictions, VA financing is not supported.
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating HOA/building walls-in or full insurance coverage and found none. Because the public remarks do not state that the building is fully insured, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE', 'fire inspection', and 'life safety' and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks and no existing field value, the feature is marked false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing in the current MLS dataset (1/20) flags a mountain (MOUNTA) view, but none of the public remarks for this building explicitly mention mountain or mauka views. Evidence is sparse and inconsistent across agents, so mountain view units may exist but the claim is tentative.
No analysis available
Six of 20 current MLS listings (6/20) indicate a city view, but the consolidated public remarks for the building do not explicitly state 'city view' or 'downtown view.' Multiple listings checking the box suggests some units may offer city vistas, but the evidence is inconsistent and likely includes agent copy/paste, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
One listing (1/20) in the current MLS dataset lists a garden view, but none of the public remarks mention garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. With only a single MLS flag and no corroborating remarks, garden view availability is possible but uncertain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views or western exposure (0 of 20 listings include 'SUNSET' in view descriptions) and 3 listings explicitly state the view is 'NONE'. Public remarks across multiple agents reference proximity to Waikiki Beach, the International Marketplace, lanai and Ala Wai Canal but never cite sunset or western-facing views, so evidence strongly indicates the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found no mentions. Listings describe proximity to Waikiki Beach and attractions but do not state views of fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager: at least 8 separate remark blocks explicitly state phrases like 'on-site manager', 'building includes an on-site manager', or 'secured building with cameras and on-site manager'. This is consistent with MLS checkbox data (RESMAN checked on 14/20 listings) and appears repeatedly across listings (some likely copy/paste), indicating the building offers an on-site manager.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated language across listings states this is a cooperative/leasehold (quotes: "Leasehold co-op requiring board approval", "Hawaiian Prince Apts is a cooperative LEASEHOLD building", "Parking is rented from the Co-op board"). Combined with COOTAX appearing in 11/20 MLS entries, the evidence is clear and consistent that the building is a co-op.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.