Hawaiian Monarch
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hawaiian Monarch
Building Overview
Hawaiian Monarch in Waikiki — concrete 1979 building with pool and ocean/mountain views, short-term rentals allowed.
About Hawaiian Monarch
Based on MLS data, Hawaiian Monarch is a concrete high-rise located in Waikiki that was built in 1979. Size details (number of units or floors) are not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views and includes on-site amenities such as a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property is served by six elevators and units use window air conditioning.
Additional MLS-derived details indicate parking is available, pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all information, including unit size, fees, policies, and management details, with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy statements and descriptive phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only include a unit-specific note that the owner occupies one unit part-time, which does not establish the building's overall owner-occupancy percentage. No building-wide owner-occupancy evidence was found.
The remarks directly confirm the building has six elevators, which matches the current building context. This is repeated in multiple listing remarks, so confidence is very high.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox CABTV is present on 11 of 20 current listings and multiple remarks explicitly state either "free Cable and internet" or refer to a TV/Internet line-item (e.g., "Monthly cable fee (TV/Internet) is $36.62"). Several agents mention "basic cable and internet" or "free Cable and internet," though a few listings reference a separate monthly cable/TV line-item, indicating inconsistent reporting across agents.
Multiple listings (repeatedly across different agents) explicitly state that electricity/common area power is included in maintenance fees (e.g., "Electricity is included in the maintenance fees"), supporting inclusion. This appears consistently in remarks and aligns with the MLS checkbox usage, indicating strong building-level practice.
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly state "Electricity included in maintenance fees (subject to usage)" across several listings, providing strong and repeated confirmation from different agents that electricity is included in the maintenance fee.
No public remarks mention gas included, and only 2 of 20 MLS entries flag GAS in association_fee_includes. Given the lack of supporting remarks and low MLS prevalence, there is little evidence the maintenance fee routinely covers gas.
HOTWAT appears in 9 of 20 MLS records, but the remarks in this dataset do not directly confirm hot water is included in maintenance fees. There are no WTRHTR indications suggesting unit water heaters, so the MLS checkbox may still be correct, but the evidence is only moderate and somewhat thin from remarks alone.
Internet inclusion is well supported: several remarks explicitly reference cable/internet fees or even free internet, and one listing states "low maintenance fee include basic cable and internet." Although only 7 of 20 MLS records currently check INTSER, the repeated direct remarks across multiple listings make this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data is fairly consistent, with 16 of 20 listings marking sewer as included in association fees. Public remarks rarely reference sewer explicitly, so this is driven primarily by the MLS pattern rather than repeated agent wording. No strong evidence suggests the feature changed.
MLS records commonly show water included, with 15 of 20 listings checking WATER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks largely focus on electricity being included or on general low maintenance fees, so water is not often spelled out in comments. Even so, the checkbox pattern is strong enough to support inclusion.
BBQ is strongly supported across the listing remarks for Hawaiian Monarch. Many listings explicitly mention "BBQ area," "BBQ grills," "barbecue area," "BBQ deck," and "outdoor BBQ's," often alongside other shared building amenities, indicating this is a common building-level feature rather than a one-off unit amenity. The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to be repeated copy-paste, but it is repeated so frequently that the feature is well validated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listings supports an exercise room/fitness center in the building. Roughly 16 of 20 current MLS listings include the amenity, and many remarks explicitly say 'fitness center,' 'exercise room,' or 'gym.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference building outdoor spaces and decks — examples include "giant pool deck", "BBQ deck", "outdoor seating deck", and "sun deck". MLS checkbox data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT checked on 11 of 20 listings, and remarks across many agents consistently mention pool decks and BBQ/picnic deck areas, indicating strong building-level patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid, though less universal, evidence for a recreation area/recreation deck in the building. About 7 of 20 current MLS listings include recreation amenities, and remarks describe a 'pool recreation area,' 'recreation deck,' and 'giant pool deck.' The feature appears to be a shared building amenity rather than a unit-specific perk.
Remarks mention a 'pool recreation deck' and 'recreation area' but never a distinct 'recreation room' despite extensive amenity lists; MLS shows RECROO in only 5/20 entries, suggesting checkbox confusion with the deck.
The building very clearly offers on-site dining or restaurant-related convenience. About 12 of 20 current MLS listings include the amenity, and remarks repeatedly mention 'restaurants in the lobby,' 'on-site restaurants,' 'cafe,' and 'coffee shop.' The consistency across many listings suggests this is a genuine building feature, not a checkbox error.
No analysis available
Across very extensive amenity descriptions, no listing mentions a sauna or steam room, while they consistently list pool, hot tub/jacuzzi, BBQ, gym, laundry, and restaurants; only 4/20 MLS entries show SAUNA, likely erroneous.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to surfboard storage or related storage amenities. Nothing in the listings indicates dedicated surfboard storage, so there is no evidence this feature exists.
No analysis available
No public remarks across the many listings mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute despite numerous other shared amenities being listed; given prior low historical confidence and lack of any mention now, it is likely that the trash chute checkbox was incorrectly applied and the building should not be listed as having a trash chute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that the building has a whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenity. Roughly 11 of 20 listings include WHIRLP, and multiple public remarks explicitly say 'hot tub,' 'jacuzzi,' or '2 whirlpools.' The repeated mentions across listings make this a reliable shared-building amenity.
Pool is confirmed by the current remarks in well over 50 listings, with repeated phrases like "outdoor pool," "swimming pool," "large pool," "resort-style pool," and "pool deck." This is reinforced by the MLS amenities data showing 19/20 listings with pool-related codes, so the evidence is extremely strong and appears consistent across many different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for salt water, saltwater, salt pool, and saline pool references. The remarks explicitly state that the building has a salt water swimming pool, which is direct evidence. No ambiguity here.
Very little evidence that any units have in-unit washer/dryer: only 1 of 20 MLS listings lists WASHER/DRYER in inclusions and none of the public remarks (across ~40 remark blocks) mention 'in-unit washer/dryer' or 'in-unit laundry'. Remarks consistently describe shared/coin laundry instead, suggesting the single MLS inclusion is an outlier or agent error.
Community laundry is clearly present in the building. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention 'community laundry,' 'laundry facilities,' 'laundry area,' or 'coin-operated laundromat,' which is consistent with the historical MLS pattern of 19 out of 20 listings showing COMLAU. This appears to be a stable building amenity rather than agent copy-paste noise.
The remarks clearly show that laundry is paid rather than free. I found multiple direct references to coin-operated and card-paid laundry, which is strong evidence for this feature. This is consistent across several listings.
I searched for explicit wording like laundry on each floor, every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. The listings consistently confirm community/on-site laundry, and one listing specifically says the laundry is on the 6th floor, which argues against every-floor laundry.
Parking is clearly available in the building, with many listings mentioning it in different forms. Remarks repeatedly say 'parking is available for a fee,' 'paid daily parking,' 'nightly parking,' and 'parking garage access available,' across numerous agents and listings. Even though current MLS checkbox data is mostly NONE, the remarks provide strong, repeated evidence that the building offers parking.
Across the listings, parking is described as available for a fee, nightly, or through an on-site garage, but not as assigned or reserved to a unit. Multiple remarks explicitly say there are no designated residential or guest-only stalls, which strongly argues against assigned parking. The single ASSIGN checkbox appears to be copy-paste MLS noise rather than a real building feature.
Multiple listings (at least 8) explicitly mention a parking garage or garage access and paid daily/nightly parking; one listing includes a management note describing the individually owned parking garage and hourly/24-hour rates. The repeated, agent-written remarks point to covered/garage parking being available (paid), so parking_covered is included with high confidence.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned parking included with the unit, or parking stall included. The remarks instead describe parking as individually owned/managed and fee-based, which does not support deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for monthly parking charge, parking rental, additional parking cost, and any recurring parking amount. I found only short-term parking references and no evidence of a monthly parking fee. Because the listings consistently describe daily or overnight parking instead, the monthly parking fee remains unknown from public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking queue. Nothing in the remarks indicates that this building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks provide clear evidence of card-based access. I found language about distinct key cards for the units and keyed elevators, which strongly supports this feature. This aligns with the building’s secure-access setup.
Strong building-level evidence supports security guard service at Hawaiian Monarch. Across many recent listings, agents consistently mention "24-hour security" or similar wording, and the repeated references across multiple remarks suggest this is not a one-off copy-paste error. Based on both historical MLS data and current remarks, security guard service should be included.
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, and patrolled-building language across the remarks. The building appears secure, but the public remarks only support staffed/security-controlled access, not a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be a consistent building feature: current MLS data shows 20/20 listings with ACWIUN included. One remark explicitly says the unit has a "new window A/C," which confirms the feature in the public remarks rather than just the checkbox data. The evidence is very strong and appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 15 of 20 current listings list CONCRE, with historically similar coverage. No remarks contradict the material, and the repeated building-wide listings look like consistent MLS data rather than a one-off agent note.
Very limited MLS checkbox signal (only 1 of 20 current listings checked 'DOUWAL') and no public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar. Given lack of historical support and absence in remarks, the single checkbox likely reflects an agent error/copy-paste rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
3 of 20 current MLS records list construction as 'MASSTU', but none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. Historical confidence was Low and the limited MLS checkbox entries may reflect inconsistent agent input rather than clear building-level construction confirmation.
Steel frame construction is not supported by the remarks, and the current MLS evidence is extremely thin at 1 of 20 listings. Because there is no explicit building-wide confirmation and no sign of a recent structural change, the checkbox appears unreliable and the feature is treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings include 'ABOGRO' and there is no historical evidence or any public remarks describing 'above ground' construction or a recent change. Given the sparse checkbox occurrence and lack of corroborating remarks across many agents, this appears to be an inconsistent/errant entry and the building is not treated as 'above ground' construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly and consistently state that short-term rentals are allowed in the building. This is strong direct evidence that STR is permitted.
I looked for hotel rental pool or hotel program language, and found direct mention of an optional hotel pool rental program. Since STR is allowed and the remarks reference a hotel pool, this feature is supported.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, such as required rental-program membership or no opt-out. The remarks instead show the pool program is optional, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state the lease end date as 08/01/2054. Using the stated expiration date, the lease expiry year is 2054.
I searched the public remarks for VA-specific language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. Based on the available remarks, there is no evidence that this building is VA loan approved.
I looked for insurance-related phrases that would indicate the HOA provides full walls-in or comprehensive building coverage. There were no clear mentions of being fully insured or fully covered in the public remarks. This remains unsupported by the listing text.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows 15/20 current listings with FIRSPR, and at least one recent remark explicitly confirms the building has a fire sprinkler system in both the units and common areas. The evidence is consistent across many listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The only related safety reference was to a fire sprinkler system, which does not confirm a passed evaluation. Based on the remarks, there is no evidence that this feature is true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many remark blocks: dozens of listings explicitly state 'ocean view', 'partial ocean', 'Pacific Ocean', or 'sparkling ocean views' (examples: 'Wake up to sparkling ocean views', 'partial ocean', 'Pacific Ocean'). This appears in multiple agents' remarks and across many unit descriptions and floor levels, indicating the building does offer ocean-view units.
Strong building-level evidence supports mountain views. Dozens of remarks mention mountain-related wording, including explicit phrases like "mountains," "mountain views," "Diamond Head and mountain views," and "cool mountain and Ala Wai views," across multiple agents and stacks. This looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
Clear evidence the building offers Diamond Head views: many listings explicitly state 'Diamond Head views' or 'framed Diamond Head' (e.g., 'stunning Mountain, City, and Diamond Head views', 'Panoramic View of Diamond Head'). These references are consistent across numerous listings and agents.
City views are clearly supported across the building. Roughly 18 of 20 current listings reference 'city skyline,' 'cityscape,' 'city lights at night,' or similar urban views, and none indicate NONE in the view field. The evidence is consistent across many remark blocks, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a data artifact.
While 'coastline' is a newer feature with no prior history, numerous listings use coastline-type phrasing such as 'sparkling coastline', 'near Waikiki Beach', 'shoreline', and 'beaches', and several units describe panoramic ocean/shoreline vistas. The repeated use of coastline/shoreline language across multiple remark blocks implies some units do offer coastline views, though most mentions are phrased as partial or nearby shoreline references rather than formal 'coastline' checkbox language.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference the Ala Wai Golf Course or 'golf course' views (multiple remarks across listings). The references are repeated across agents and listings, indicating that some units in the building offer golf course views and warrant inclusion.
Strong building-level evidence supports marina/canal-type views. Many listings mention "Ala Wai Canal," "marina," or "canal" views, often alongside ocean or city views, and the wording appears across multiple listings and agents. The consistency suggests this is a real building feature, not a checkbox error.
Multiple remarks explicitly reference 'sunrise views,' 'beautiful sunrise view,' 'Wake up watching the beautiful sunrise to start your day,' and 'your daily Waikiki sunrise,' indicating eastern exposures in some stacks.
Several listings explicitly mention 'beautiful sunset views', 'sunset views facing the canal', or evening sights like 'Friday night fireworks', indicating that some units have western/sunset exposure. While MLS checkbox counts show 0/20 for SUNSET, repeated remark mentions across listings support including view_sunset for the building.
No analysis available
I looked specifically for views of fireworks from the units, not just proximity to fireworks events. The remarks directly confirm that fireworks can be seen from the unit/window. This is strong and unambiguous evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is consistent evidence across listings: several remarks reference an on-site manager or general manager (examples include "on-site manager" and "General Manager on site"), and MLS amenity data marks RESMAN on many units (10 of 20). The combination of historical MLS data and multiple agent remarks supports including resident_manager=true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.