Hawaiian Crown

MLS property data is consistent across all 10 listings with year_built=1966. Since no remarks indicate a different build year or a full reconstruction, 1966 is accepted as the building’s construction year.

Remarks in one listing state that 'the Hawaiian Crown is a convenient, nine-floor building.' No remarks contradict this, and observed unit floors up to 7 fit within a 9-story building, so 9 floors is adopted as the building total.

No listing remarks mention how many units Hawaiian Crown has (e.g., 'xx-unit building'), and the MLS property data did not provide a unit_total value. Because there is no explicit or reliable indirect evidence, the total unit count is left unknown.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." No such statements were found, so the verified current value of 36.00 is retained with low confidence.

The remarks repeatedly confirm that the building has an elevator, including "secured entry, elevator" and "community laundry, elevator, heated pool." Because the references are singular and no higher count is stated, the current value of 1 is supported.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Multiple remarks describe the units as cooled by trade winds and do not mention any central air system. With 0/10 MLS listings indicating central AC in the fee, it is very likely that there is no central AC cost included in the maintenance fees.

At least three remarks explicitly say fees include cable, including “premium cable” and “cable & 300 mb internet package included.” The repeated language across listings, together with CABTV appearing in 9/15 MLS records, strongly supports inclusion.

No public remark specifically mentions common-area electricity or building power. However, 12/15 listings identify OTCOEX as included, making this more likely a building-level fee inclusion than an isolated agent error.

The building is explicitly marketed as Fee Simple, not a cooperative. With no MLS indication of cooperative taxes being included, there is effectively no chance that co-op taxes are part of the maintenance fee.

No listing remarks mention electricity being included, while the current MLS data shows ELECTR in only 1/15 listings. The isolated checkbox appears inconsistent with the strong historical pattern and is likely an agent data error.

There are no public remarks describing gas as an included utility or indicating a building gas service. GAS appears in only 1/15 MLS records, so the isolated checkbox is insufficient to establish this feature.

Remarks specifically mention unit-level water heaters, including “tankless water heater” and “new water heater.” Combined with WTRHTR in 4/15 listings and HOTWAT in only 1/15, the evidence strongly supports excluding included hot water.

At least three remarks explicitly confirm internet inclusion, with phrases such as “premium cable with internet” and “cable & 300 mb internet package included.” The remarks come from multiple listing descriptions and align with INTSER appearing in 7/15 records.

The building is presented as a landlocked Waikiki condo with a pool and city/beach proximity, not as a marina community. With no MLS or remark references to marina access or fees, marina costs are not part of the maintenance fees.

Remarks state that fees include “water, sewer” and “water, sewage, trash removal services.” The explicit confirmations, together with SEWER appearing in 14/15 listings, provide strong building-level evidence.

Several listings directly say “Maintenance fees include water” or that HOA fees include “water, sewage, trash removal services.” The remarks and 14/15 MLS prevalence strongly establish water as an included fee item.

Remarks highlight a pool, picnic area, lounge area, and convenience store, but none of the 9 descriptive listings reference BBQs or grills. With 1/10 MLS BBQ checks and no text support, the single checkbox is likely an agent error.

The most detailed remark states there is 'parking for mopeds, scooters, bicycles & surfboard storage', implying dedicated on-site bicycle parking/storage for residents. Although only one listing mentions bikes explicitly, its specificity and context (alongside consistent surfboard storage mentions) provide strong evidence that bicycle storage/parking is offered at the building.

Remarks emphasize walking distance to Waikiki Beach and parks but do not reference direct waterfront dock access or moorings. This urban location and lack of mention make it virtually certain there is no boat dock.

Amenities described include parking for mopeds/scooters/bicycles and a reserved parking stall, but nothing about a vehicle wash area or car wash station. This makes it very likely there is no car wash amenity.

Across all listings, common areas are limited to the pool, picnic/lounge area, laundry, surfboard storage, and convenience store. The absence of any 'clubhouse' or similar facility in both text and checkboxes strongly indicates there is no clubhouse.

The building is repeatedly described as a boutique property with a resident manager and on-site/nearby convenience store but never a concierge or staffed front desk. With no MLS records indicating concierge service, it is almost certain that no concierge is provided.

Several listings note the building is 'pet friendly' but stop at that, listing no dedicated pet facilities. The lack of any 'dog park' or 'dog run' reference across multiple agents indicates no such amenity exists.

Across all available remarks, there is no mention of a doorman or lobby attendant, only a resident manager and secure/locked access. Combined with the doorman amenity being unchecked in all 10 MLS records, the building almost certainly does not have a doorman service.

Across all provided listings, amenities repeatedly include pool, community/on-site laundry, surfboard storage, picnic/lounge areas, and a convenience store, but never an exercise room or gym. Given the small boutique nature of the building and 0/10 MLS entries with EXEROO, it is very likely no exercise room exists.

Listings describe a modest, boutique building rather than a luxury high-rise with concierge-style services. The complete lack of any limo or car service references makes it virtually certain this amenity is not offered.

The building is consistently described as a small boutique property with basic amenities but no mention of any dedicated meeting or conference space. This strongly suggests there is no meeting room amenity.

At least 6 listings explicitly mention a lanai, including private, covered, and spacious lanais, while other remarks describe a community lanai area or picnic area. The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly confirm that Hawaiian Crown offers patio/deck-style outdoor space; this is consistent with the 10/15 current MLS amenity entries.

Remarks emphasize nearby parks and beaches rather than internal trails, and the building appears to occupy a compact urban lot. This strongly suggests there is no dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity.

Agents consistently list the pool, picnic area, and proximity to the Honolulu Zoo and Kapiolani Park but never an on-site playground. This makes it very likely the building does not offer a children's play area.

Across all remarks, outdoor references are limited to lanais, pool, surfboard storage, and a picnic area, with no mention of any kind of private yard or enclosed yard space. Given the high-rise boutique nature of the building and 0/10 MLS entries for PRIYAR, it is very unlikely that any units have private yard areas.

All remarks focus on urban Waikiki conveniences and basic building amenities, with no hint of any golf practice or putting facilities. It is virtually certain there is no putting green.

Several remarks refer to a 'picnic area' and 'lounge area' in conjunction with the pool, indicating a common outdoor recreation space. While the words 'recreation deck' or 'recreation area' are not used explicitly, this combination is consistent with a building recreation area.

Amenities are consistently listed as pool, community/on-site laundry, surfboard storage, picnic area, and a convenience store. The lone 'lounge area' reference is vague and not clearly a recreation room, so a true dedicated rec room is unlikely.

Agents repeatedly highlight a convenience store downstairs and nearby 'restaurants, bars, nightclubs' in the neighborhood. The absence of any mention of an in-building restaurant indicates no such amenity exists.

Listings highlight a ground-level or pool-front orientation and do not reference rooftop access or a roof deck. Given repeated detailed amenity descriptions, it is very likely there is no shared rooftop feature.

Agents detail even relatively minor features like outdoor showers and surfboard storage but never a sauna. The consistent omission indicates there is no sauna facility in the building.

At least 4 listings explicitly mention storage lockers or external storage, including a "private storage locker" and "external storage locker," while several others reference a building storage area. The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agreement with the historically high-confidence MLS data strongly support that storage units or lockers are available in the building.

Surfboard storage is strongly supported by repeated remarks, including “surfboard storage,” “surfboard racks,” and “surf rack storage.” One listing also notes a small monthly fee for the storage.

All listings focus on a pool, laundry facilities, surfboard storage, and proximity to Waikiki and Kapiolani Park, with no indication of on-site tennis facilities. Given the small footprint of this boutique Waikiki building, it is almost certain there is no tennis court.

Listings talk about community/on-site laundry, storage, and a convenience store but do not mention trash chutes, which some agents will highlight when present. With most MLS entries not checking TRACHU and no textual support, it is somewhat likely the building lacks a trash chute system.

Multiple listings describe conventional parking (“1 assigned parking stall,” “ground-floor parking stall,” “on street parking”) but never mention valet, which would typically be advertised. With no VALET MLS flags and no textual evidence, the building appears not to offer valet service.

One listing notes entry 'through the back gate' to reach the unit and shared amenities, suggesting a fenced or gated boundary around parts of the property. With 3 of 10 MLS listings also marking a gated/wall/fence amenity, there is moderate, multi-agent evidence that the building has some perimeter fencing or gating.

Multiple listings enthusiastically promote the pool and pool-front units but never mention a separate hot tub or spa. This strongly suggests there is only a standard pool and no whirlpool amenity.

The pool is strongly confirmed across multiple listings and agents: at least 12 current remarks explicitly mention a pool, including "heated swimming pool," "heated pool," "pool-front unit," and "take a dip in the pool." This corroborates the historical high-confidence record and current MLS amenity data, with evidence far beyond a likely copied checkbox.

At least two separate remarks clearly describe a "heated pool" among the building amenities, not just a generic pool. This matches the MLS data where 2/13 listings have the heated-pool amenity code, while no remarks contradict or specify an unheated pool. Given prior high confidence and consistent recent mentions, it is very likely the building’s shared pool is heated.

I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, and saline pool. The listings confirm a pool exists, but provide no evidence that it is saltwater.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to in-unit washers/dryers (no 'in-unit laundry', 'washer/dryer in unit', or similar phrases). Instead, agents repeatedly describe shared facilities such as 'community laundry', 'laundry room', and 'on-site laundry', and 11/12 MLS entries are aligned with shared laundry only. Given the strong, consistent emphasis on common-area laundry and the isolated, unsupported MLS checkbox, in-unit laundry is very unlikely to be a building feature.

At least 9 current listings explicitly mention shared laundry, including 'community laundry,' 'community laundry facility,' 'laundry room,' and 'on-site laundry.' This aligns with the strong MLS evidence (13/15 listings) and historical high confidence, indicating the building offers community laundry rather than in-unit laundry.

I searched for coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, laundry fees, and quarters. No payment requirement was mentioned in the remarks.

I searched for references to laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. None were found; the listings only confirm shared community laundry facilities.

At least 8 listings explicitly mention parking, including “one parking space,” “1 assigned parking stall,” “one sought-after RESERVED parking stall,” and “assigned parking.” Other remarks describe complimentary moped parking or nearby rented spaces, so the evidence across multiple listings supports that the building offers parking, even though availability and ownership vary by unit.

Multiple listings clearly describe assigned or reserved stalls, including '1 assigned parking stall' and 'one sought-after RESERVED parking stall.' Another unit references a specific 'parking space' rented long-term and 'not deeded with the unit,' consistent with designated but separately controlled stalls. This repeated, detailed language across different listings confirms that the building offers assigned/reserved parking spaces.

When parking is mentioned, it is described only as a “ground-floor parking stall” without any reference to being covered, enclosed, or in a garage. MLS checkbox data for all 10 listings shows no covered or garage parking features selected. Given how often agents emphasize covered parking when present, the consistent absence implies the building does not offer covered car parking.

The remarks directly deny deeded parking for the referenced parking space. Although other listings mention an assigned or reserved stall, the explicit statement that the space is not deeded is the strongest evidence.

Across all listings, there is no mention of electric vehicle charging or charging stations, even in detailed amenity descriptions. MLS data also never marks EV charging for this building. This consistent lack of reference supports that the building does not provide EV charging facilities.

The most specific parking description reports a monthly rental fee of $225. A separate listing cites $180/month for parking one block away, indicating that fees may vary by space or arrangement; $225 is the clearest unit-associated figure.

Agents do not advertise guest or visitor parking anywhere, which would normally be highlighted as a strong selling point in Waikiki if available. Instead, remarks mention “Some residents have rented parking in nearby buildings” and “Plenty of on street parking,” indicating on-site stalls are limited and not set aside for guests. Combined with MLS data, this strongly suggests there is no dedicated guest parking.

Security is repeatedly referenced for the building itself (e.g., “Secured entry to building,” “secured, pet-friendly building”) but not for the parking area. No agent claims gated or controlled-access parking, which would typically be promoted. The absence of such mentions and of SECENT in MLS data indicates the parking area itself does not have separate secured entry.

Parking, when mentioned, is described only as a single “ground-floor parking stall” or “RESERVED parking stall,” with no indication of back-to-back or tandem arrangements. MLS checkbox data never marks TANDEM for this building. This consistent pattern supports that tandem parking is not a feature here.

The building is repeatedly described as a “boutique” property with modest amenities like a pool, community laundry, and a convenience store, but never valet or attended parking. MLS data also does not indicate valet service. Given the building type and complete lack of mentions, valet parking is effectively ruled out.

The remarks discuss rented, assigned, reserved, moped, and nearby parking, but do not mention a parking waitlist. Therefore, a waitlist system is not supported by the available public remarks.

Listings mention an elevator but never describe it as keyed, fob-access, or otherwise restricted. With 0/10 MLS listings indicating elevator security and no textual support, a secure keyed elevator system is very unlikely.

I searched for card, fob, keycard, card-reader, and electronic-access language. General security wording is present, but no card-based system is specified.

Across 9 listings, none mention a security guard or 24/7 security; agents instead highlight a resident manager and secured/locked entry. With 0/10 MLS entries marking a guard amenity, the evidence strongly indicates there is no dedicated security guard service at this building.

I searched for explicit patrol-related language. The listings mention a resident manager and secured entry, but do not support the presence of security patrol service.

None of the 9 public remarks mention cameras or video surveillance, focusing only on secured entry and a secure lobby. Given that 0/10 MLS listings mark a security system and such a feature is typically marketed when present, building-wide video security is very unlikely.

Across all available listings for Hawaiian Crown, no MLS checkboxes or remarks indicate central air conditioning, and 0/10 listings carry any central AC-related codes. Multiple agents instead emphasize natural cooling like 'pleasant ocean breezes' and 'tradewind breezes flow through this home,' suggesting the building relies on passive airflow and window units rather than a central HVAC system. In this context, central AC is very unlikely to be present in any units.

None of the reviewed listings for this building mention or checkbox split, ductless, or mini-split AC, despite multiple detailed renovation descriptions that would normally call out that upgrade. Given 0/10 MLS inclusions for split AC and repeated emphasis on natural breezes and older-building characteristics, the evidence points to units not being equipped with split AC systems. It is therefore highly likely that split AC is not currently a feature offered in this building’s units.

No public remarks explicitly mention window AC, window units, or wall AC. However, ACWIUN appears in 8 of 15 current listings and 11 of 21 combined listings, which is consistent with some units offering window air conditioning, though the evidence is primarily checkbox-based rather than narrative confirmation.

Current MLS data identifies concrete construction in 12 of 15 listings, and historical data was also consistently high for concrete. Public remarks do not directly say "concrete," but references to "thick stone walls and floors" support the presence of substantial masonry construction; the checkbox evidence is strong across listings.

A minority (3 of 10) of MLS records report double-wall construction, with no contrary indicators. This pattern suggests that some building components or units use double-wall construction, though it may not be consistently reported by all agents.

Hollow tile is not mentioned in any of the supplied public remarks. The feature appears in only 2 of 15 current MLS records and has historically been absent, so there is no strong evidence that the building uses hollow tile construction.

Masonry/stucco is reported in just 1 of 10 MLS records, versus a strong majority reporting concrete construction. With no remarks mentioning masonry or stucco, the balance of evidence suggests the building is not classified as masonry/stucco construction in practice.

None of the MLS entries identify steel frame construction. The strong consensus on concrete construction, combined with local building norms, makes a primary steel frame structure unlikely.

Only one MLS entry explicitly reports slab construction, but the building’s scale and concrete structure make a concrete slab foundation highly likely. In the absence of any conflicting information, it is reasonable to treat slab construction as present.

No analysis available

No listings report wood frame construction, and nearly all instead report concrete. Given the building’s size and location, a wood-frame structural system would be atypical, so this is very likely not a wood-frame building.

Six of 15 current listings mark ABOGRO, consistent with prior high-confidence MLS history. The remarks do not explicitly say "above ground," but descriptions of the nine-floor building and facilities at ground level provide supporting context; evidence is moderate-to-strong but largely checkbox-based.

No MLS records describe the building as brick construction, and brick mid/high-rise condos are atypical in this market. The evidence strongly indicates the building is not brick-constructed.

No MLS entries indicate single-wall construction, and the building type (multi-story concrete condo) is inconsistent with traditional single-wall methods. This strongly supports that the building is not single-wall construction.

Multiple listings explicitly permit rentals of 30 days or more and reference Airbnb/VRBO. Under the stated rule, this confirms that short-term rental use is allowed.

The remarks were searched for hotel-pool and rental-program language, including managed hotel operations and branded pools. None was found, so participation in a hotel rental pool is not supported.

The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a rental program, cannot opt out, or are required to place units in a hotel pool. Because hotel-pool participation is not identified and STR pool participation is not evidenced, mandatory participation is false.

At least 2 of the 10 listings explicitly state the units are 'fee simple' (e.g., 'Fee Simple value in Waikiki,' 'One Bedroom fee simple unit'), and none mention leasehold or lease rent. Although the MLS tenure checkboxes are blank (0/10 marked FS), the repeated explicit 'fee simple' language from different listings indicates the building has Fee Simple units and is likely entirely Fee Simple (FS: at least 2 of 10; LH: 0 of 10).

Across all 10 listings, there are no references to 'leasehold,' 'lease rent,' or lease expiry dates, and none of the tenure fields are marked LH. In contrast, multiple listings highlight 'fee simple' status, so it is concluded with high confidence that the building does not offer leasehold units (LH: 0 of 10 vs FS mentions in at least 2 of 10).

No specific ground-lease, leasehold, renewal, or expiration year was found in the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly call the property “fee simple,” so there is no applicable lease-expiry year to report.

The public remarks were searched for explicit VA-related terms, including “VA approved,” “VA financing,” and “VA loans accepted.” No such language was found, so VA approval cannot be confirmed.

The public remarks directly and repeatedly state "FULLY INSURED BUILDING." This matches the definition of full HOA building insurance or walls-in coverage and provides strong evidence for true.

No listings mention 'fire sprinklers' or similar terms, and the FIRSPR amenity is unchecked in all 10 MLS entries. This suggests the building likely does not have a documented fire sprinkler system, but the conclusion is made with only moderate confidence due to common under-reporting of this feature.

I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, FLSE, fire inspection passage, safety certification, and life-safety compliance. None of these were mentioned, so there is no evidence that the building has passed an FLSE; the value is set to false with medium-low confidence under the no-mention rule.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

One of ten recent listings explicitly checked OCEAN in the MLS view description, and the building is described multiple times as being only a block from Waikiki Beach. Even though remarks focus on proximity rather than ‘ocean view,’ the combination of height and location makes it credible that some units have ocean views.

Two of ten listings have the mountain view checkbox selected in MLS data, indicating at least some units face the mountains. Although the public remarks do not spell out ‘mountain view,’ the view data and building height strongly support that some units enjoy mountain views.

Across all provided remarks, Diamond Head is mentioned only as a place you can easily access, not something visible from the units. With 0/10 MLS view descriptions checking Diamond Head, it is very likely this building is not marketed as having Diamond Head views.

MLS data shows 4 of 14 listings flag CITY in the view_descriptions while 2 of 14 list NONE. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a 'city view', 'downtown view', or 'cityscape', so the evidence is mixed — several listings indicate city views across agents, but remarks do not confirm, giving moderate overall confidence that some units offer city views.

Listings repeatedly stress proximity to Waikiki Beach but never claim a coastline or shoreline view, and the MLS view checkboxes are consistently negative for this attribute. This strongly indicates that coastline views are not a feature of the building.

The building is portrayed as a compact, pool-front, urban condo with community amenities but not as a garden or courtyard setting. With 0/10 MLS view entries indicating garden and no textual references, it is unlikely that garden views are a recognized feature here.

Although Ala Wai Golf Course exists in the broader area, no listing remarks or MLS view selections refer to a golf course view for this building. This consistent absence across all listings makes it very likely that no units have notable golf course views.

The building is described as central Waikiki, near beach, zoo, parks, and shopping, but never in relation to a marina or harbor. With 0/10 listings marking a marina-type view, it is very likely that no units in this building are marketed as having marina or harbor views.

Agents emphasize breezes, pool, and central location but never highlight sunrise or morning sun views. The complete lack of both MLS and narrative references suggests sunrise views are not a marketed feature of this building.

None of the 15 listings mention sunset views or related phrases such as evening sun or western exposure. Four listings explicitly report no view, and the consistent absence across multiple agents supports that the building does not offer a verified sunset-view feature.

Neither MLS data nor agent remarks mention any cemetery nearby or in the view, and the building’s central Waikiki location makes such a view very unlikely. It is therefore almost certain that no units in this building have cemetery views.

I searched for explicit references to Friday night fireworks views from a unit, lanai, or the building. The listings discuss beach proximity and Waikiki attractions but do not establish a fireworks view.

No analysis available

At least 5 listings clearly describe the building as pet friendly, including specific language like “Pet friendly (30 lbs or less)” and “secured pet-friendly building.” The absence of any NOPET restriction codes in MLS further supports that pets are allowed in this building, likely with weight limits.

Six of the 15 current listings explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager, including multiple detailed statements that the "resident manager lives on site." This confirms the historically high-confidence feature across multiple listings and agents rather than relying only on copied MLS checkbox data.

Listings describe the property as a fee-simple condominium with 30-day minimum rentals and do not reference any hotel management, front desk, or rental pool. The lack of CONDOT coding and any “condotel” or “condo-hotel” language indicates it does not operate as a condotel.

Multiple listings use condominium and fee-simple terminology such as “FEE SIMPLE VALUE IN WAIKIKI” and “fee simple unit,” and none mention co-op or share-based ownership. Combined with the absence of COOTAX indicators, this strongly supports that the building is a condo, not a cooperative.