Harbor View Plaza

All 20 listings consistently report the building’s year built as 1968 in the MLS data. No remarks contradict this, so 1968 is accepted as the construction year with high confidence.

Across 20 listings, the highest reported unit floor is 13, and no remarks indicate penthouse, top floor, or a taller tower. Following the guidance to use the maximum observed floor when no explicit building height is stated, the building is treated as 13 stories.

No listing remarks describe the building as having a specific number of units (e.g., '109-unit building'), and the MLS unit-count field is uniformly 0, suggesting missing data rather than an actual size. The true total unit count is effectively unknown based on current evidence.

I searched for numeric statements like '80% owner occupied' but found none. Although the remarks say 'high owner occupancy create a true community feel', there is no explicit percentage to override the existing 37.00, so per rules I retained 37.00 with low confidence.

I searched the remarks for 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', and 'multiple elevators' and found no references. Because a current value (2) exists and nothing in the remarks confirms or contradicts it, I retained 2 with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks describe split A/C and individual air conditioning units within condos, implying unit-level systems rather than building-supplied central A/C. With no MLS indications that central A/C is included in fees, it is very likely not a fee-covered building service.

Strong, consistent evidence that the association fee includes cable/internet. Public remarks repeatedly state phrases like "Cable and Internet" and "Hawaiian Telcom bulk cable/internet," and the MLS checkbox is present in 20 of 20 current listings, indicating broad agreement across agents.

Evidence for common-area electricity being included is weak: although 12 of 20 MLS listings have the OTCOEX checkbox, none of the public remarks reviewed mention "common area electricity" or similar phrases. This suggests the OTCOEX checkbox may be inconsistently applied or copied across listings rather than reflected in agent remarks.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium, not a cooperative, and no listing mentions co-op or cooperative taxes. With no MLS flags for COOTAX, it is safe to conclude cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Several listings explicitly enumerate included utilities as cable, internet, water, and sewer, without mentioning electricity. Combined with all MLS records leaving ELECTR unchecked, this strongly indicates that individual unit electric bills are not included in the maintenance fee.

None of the public remarks mention gas service, and no MLS records indicate gas as an included fee item. This makes it highly likely that gas (if present at all) is not a utility covered by the maintenance fee.

Multiple listing remarks describe in-unit tankless or on-demand water heaters (phrases such as "tankless water heater" and "on-demand hot-water heater" appear across listings), and MLS inclusion flags show WTRHTR present while HOTWAT is unchecked. Together this strongly indicates hot water is not covered by the association fees and is supplied by unit-level heaters.

Several listings explicitly state internet (or bulk internet service) is included in the maintenance fee (phrases like "internet included," "maintenance fees that cover internet," and "Hawaiian Telcom bulk ... internet" appear across remarks). This matches prior MLS checkbox prevalence and is repeated across agents, providing strong evidence.

Listings frequently mention marina and harbor views, but never describe marina access, boat slips, or related fees as part of the HOA. With no MLS markers for MARINA, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

Clear and consistent evidence that sewer is included in the association fee. Remarks across listings explicitly state that maintenance fees include "sewer," and the MLS checkbox is present in 20 of 20 current listings, showing strong agreement among agents.

Strong, repeated evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks across listings explicitly list "water" or "water included," and the MLS checkbox is present in 20 of 20 listings, indicating consistent reporting by multiple agents.

Strong evidence the building has BBQ facilities. The public remarks repeatedly state amenities such as "BBQ", "BBQ area", and "picnic area/BBQ" in numerous listings (appearing across this corpus many times), matching historical MLS data (17/20). Mentions come from multiple agent remarks rather than a single outlier, indicating the amenity is a building-level feature.

Public remarks from multiple agents note on-site bicycle storage, using phrases like 'surfboard/bicycle racks', 'bike/surfboard storage', and 'Surfboard/Bicycle Racks are available on property'. These consistent, specific references across different listings indicate that the building has shared bicycle storage facilities, even though the MLS bike storage checkbox is not being used. Given the strength and repetition of these remarks, bike storage should be considered an established building amenity.

Listings describe 'beautiful Ocean, Marina overlooking the boat harbor' and views of Ala Wai Harbor, indicating visual proximity rather than dedicated docking facilities. Without explicit boat dock or marina language, it is very likely the building lacks its own boat dock.

At least three separate remarks list 'car wash' alongside pool, BBQ, and picnic area as standard amenities. Repeated, specific mention across different agents is strong evidence that a shared car wash area exists in the building.

Where agents would typically highlight a clubhouse, they instead focus on pool, BBQ, picnic area, and storage. The lack of any clubhouse terminology across many remarks and MLS supports that no clubhouse amenity exists.

Across many differently worded listings, there is no suggestion of concierge or front-desk services, and the corresponding MLS amenity is never used. This consistent absence in both narrative and checkbox data makes it very likely that the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently describe pet rules (1 dog or 1 cat, 25 lbs max) but never a dedicated pet exercise area. This strongly suggests pet ownership is allowed without any on-site dog park facility.

Despite extensive descriptions of location, views, and building features, no agent mentions a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS amenity is never selected. For this mid-market Waikiki condo, that omission plus the chosen wording strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents list amenities like pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but never a gym or fitness center. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkmarks, this strongly indicates the building does not have an exercise room.

Even high-end feature descriptions focus on views and unit upgrades, with no hint of building-provided transportation services. This makes it almost certain there is no limousine or house car service.

Detailed amenity lists omit any meeting or conference room despite covering multiple smaller features like storage lockers and surfboard racks. The single MLS checkmark is likely a data error, so the building is treated as not having a meeting room.

Strong evidence that the building offers patios/decks: well over a dozen listing remarks reference a lanai or covered lanai (quotes include "private lanai", "covered lanai", and "covered lanai w/ hurricane shutters"). Historical data previously rated High (10+ listings) and the current remarks from multiple agents consistently mention lanais, indicating this is a genuine building feature rather than a copy/paste error.

References to walking paths clearly relate to surrounding parks and area amenities, not building property. With no explicit on-site trail or path mentioned, the building is treated as not having a jogging/walking path amenity.

Amenity descriptions focus on adult-oriented features like pool, BBQ, and car wash, with no mention of kids’ play structures. This makes it very likely the building does not offer a playground.

All outdoor space references are to lanais (balconies) rather than any type of yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Combined with the high-rise urban setting and absence of the PRIYAR amenity in MLS across 20 listings, this strongly suggests that private yards are not a feature of this building.

Across all detailed amenity write-ups, golf or putting facilities are never cited. Given how prominently such a feature would be marketed, this is strong evidence that no putting green exists.

At least three listings state 'Amenities include ... picnic area' or similar, indicating a designated outdoor common area for leisure. Even though MLS does not flag RECARE, the consistent 'picnic area' language shows the building provides a recreation area.

Amenity paragraphs highlight pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but do not mention any rec room or game room. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building lacks a dedicated recreation room.

Agents consistently market the location as 'steps away' from restaurants at Ala Moana Center and Waikiki, not as having its own dining facility. This strongly indicates there is no on-site restaurant amenity.

View descriptions are always tied to individual lanais or unit orientation, not a shared roof deck or rooftop terrace. With no remark or MLS evidence, it is very likely there are no rooftop amenities.

Agents provide detailed amenity overviews yet never refer to any sauna or steam facility. This strongly suggests the building does not offer a sauna.

Strong evidence the building provides storage units/lockers. Historical MLS checkboxes indicated storage in ~17 of 20 listings, and current remarks across many listings (approximately 12–15 separate remarks) explicitly state 'extra storage unit in the garage', 'private storage in the parking garage', 'storage locker', or 'exterior storage closet'. The consistency across multiple agents and listings supports a high-confidence inclusion of this building-level amenity.

Public remarks consistently and explicitly mention surfboard storage/racks and a dedicated surfboard storage area across multiple listings, indicating this amenity is available on the property.

Agents repeatedly describe the building’s amenities but never refer to tennis courts or tennis facilities. The complete absence in both remarks and MLS checkboxes makes it very likely there is no tennis court at this property.

No public remarks in this corpus mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute despite some MLS checkbox entries (current MLS shows 11/20). Given the absence of any remark across multiple listings and prior low confidence, it's likely the chute is not a reliably advertised amenity, though MLS checkbox data still suggests some agents may have checked it.

Parking is consistently described as assigned, covered, secured, or tandem, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. Given repeated detailed descriptions of parking without mentioning valet, it is very likely the building does not offer valet service.

Several agents describe 'gated assigned parking' and a 'secured entry', showing that access to the parking/entry area is controlled by a physical gate or enclosure. Even without MLS GATED/WALFEN checked, these repeated descriptions across different listings support that the property has a gated/perimeter-type physical barrier.

Amenity lists consistently name only a pool, with no secondary hot-tub-type feature. Given how marketable a whirlpool would be, its absence in remarks and MLS strongly indicates it is not present.

Strong evidence the building has a swimming pool: 19/20 current MLS listings include the pool amenity and multiple agent remarks explicitly state "swimming pool" (examples: "Amenities include swimming pool," "very relaxing swimming pool," "don't forget the pool"). Mentions appear across many different listing remarks rather than isolated to a single agent, indicating the pool is a bona fide shared building amenity.

Across all provided remarks, the pool is never described as heated and is only referred to generically as a 'swimming pool' or 'pool to cool off.' MLS data for 20 listings also shows no heated-pool indicators, so there is no support for a heated pool feature at this building.

Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline' and found no mentions. While a pool is noted in amenities, the type (salt vs. chlorine) is not specified in the public remarks.

Strong evidence that some units in this building have in-unit laundry: current remarks frequently state "In-unit washer/dryer", "full size W/D in unit", and "washer/dryer combo", and historical MLS data shows 19/20 listings included WASHER/DRYER. Mentions appear across numerous listings/agents rather than a single outlier, so inclusion is well supported for buyers searching for in-unit laundry.

None of the MLS records for this building mark community laundry as an amenity, and no remarks mention a shared laundry room or coin laundry. Amenities lists instead focus on pool, BBQ, car wash, storage, and bike/surfboard racks, while stressing in-unit washer/dryers, indicating there is likely no community laundry facility.

Searched for 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'card operated', 'paid laundry' and found no matches. There is no evidence in the public remarks that any community laundry (paid or coin) exists.

Searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'laundry on each floor' but found none. Listings consistently emphasize in-unit washer/dryer rather than community laundry facilities.

All 20 current MLS listings indicate some type of on-site parking, and multiple remarks reference unit-specific stalls and a parking garage. Phrases like “covered parking” and “parking garage” appear across several different listings and agents, confirming building parking is broadly available.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers assigned parking: over a dozen (≈15+) separate listings explicitly state assigned or designated stalls (phrases include "one assigned covered parking stall", "dedicated parking stall", "gated assigned parking"). Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste instance, supporting a high-confidence true value.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides covered parking: at least a dozen (≈15+) listings explicitly reference covered or secured parking (quotes include "assigned covered parking stall", "1 covered corner parking stall", "covered, secured parking", "covered tandem parking"). These references are widespread among different listings/agents, indicating the feature is building-wide.

Listings consistently describe assigned, covered, secured or designated parking stalls and storage lockers, but none explicitly state parking is deeded or conveyed with the unit. I searched for 'deeded', 'convey', and 'owned parking' and found no direct language indicating deeded parking.

None of the 20 current MLS entries check any EV charging feature, and no agent remarks mention EV chargers, Tesla stations, or similar amenities. Given how consistently other amenities are advertised, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer EV charging stations.

Remarks describe assigned/covered parking stalls and some tandem configurations but include no language about a separate monthly parking fee. I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', '$', and related terms and found none.

No listings mark guest parking in MLS, and the only guest-related reference is to public street parking, not on-site guest stalls. The absence of any mention of dedicated guest parking across many remarks makes it very likely the building does not provide its own guest parking area.

Moderately strong evidence: at least 8 listings mention secure or gated access (examples: 'Secure entry', 'secured building', 'secure gated assigned covered parking space', 'covered parking that has secure access to residents'). Multiple agents reference building security and gated/secure parking rather than a single isolated claim, supporting inclusion.

At least one listing specifically advertises “two covered tandem parking on the first floor,” and a couple of MLS entries are coded TANDEM. This shows that some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls, making tandem parking an available building feature.

Across all provided remarks, agents highlight many amenities but never mention valet or attended parking, and no MLS entry checks a valet feature. This consistent omission is strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking service.

I searched the remarks for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', 'join waitlist', and similar phrases but found no references. Absence of mention provides no public evidence of a waitlist system.

Listings highlight a 'secured building', 'secured entry', and gated parking but are completely silent about keyed or fob-access elevators. Combined with the absence of any MLS checkbox usage for this feature, it is very likely the elevators are not access-controlled in this way.

Searched for terms like 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' but found none. The building is described as secure, but there is no explicit evidence of card/fob access in the remarks.

Historical MLS checkbox shows SECGUA in 14/20 listings. Multiple current remarks describe the property as a “well-maintained and secured building,” “secure entry,” “secure gated assigned parking,” and list “security” among amenities (appears across numerous agent remarks). While remarks stop short of explicitly stating 24/7 on-site guard staffing, the consistent use of “secured” and “security” across many listings (likely from several agents though some copy/paste is evident) provides strong evidence the building offers security services.

Searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrol service' with no matches. Although security/secured is repeatedly mentioned, there is no evidence of a dedicated patrol service in the public remarks.

Across all supplied remarks, there are no references to cameras, CCTV, or video surveillance, and the MLS security-system checkbox is never used. Given that agents do emphasize other security features, the absence of any mention of video monitoring indicates this feature is very likely not present.

Across all provided remarks there are no mentions of 'central AC' or centralized HVAC; instead, units are described with their own A/C or split AC systems. Current MLS data shows just 1 of 20 listings flagged for central AC, which strongly suggests that was an agent error rather than a true building-wide system. Given the consistent pattern of individual systems, the building is very unlikely to have central air conditioning.

At least 5 of 20 MLS inclusions list ACSPL and multiple current public remarks (≈6 listings) explicitly state 'split AC' or 'brand-new split AC' (e.g., "brand-new split AC", "This unit features a split AC"). Mentions appear across different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting that some units in the building have ductless mini-split systems.

Approximately 10 of 20 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, implying some units might have window/wall air conditioners. However, none of the public remarks explicitly say 'window AC' or 'window unit'—many listings instead reference 'split AC' or 'A/C'—so evidence is limited and likely due to agents checking the MLS box rather than consistent unit features.

All 20 of 20 current MLS listings list the building construction as CONCRE (reinforced concrete). None of the public remarks explicitly state construction material, but there is no contradictory language and historical MLS checkbox data is unanimous across agents, supporting high confidence that the building is concrete construction.

A majority of current MLS listings (11 of 20) indicate double-wall construction, but none of the provided public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. The evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes across multiple listings (possible copy/paste), so double-wall is included but with moderate confidence.

No listing identifies hollow tile construction or mentions it in narrative remarks. With universal selection of concrete and no evidence of hollow tile, this construction type is unlikely for the primary structure.

Masonry/stucco is rarely selected in MLS (2 of 20) and never appears in the public remarks, whereas concrete is universally indicated. Given the low and inconsistent signal and lack of descriptive support, we treat masonry/stucco construction as not a defining building feature.

No listings mark steel frame construction and all agree on concrete, with no narrative references to steel framing. For this vintage and location, a reinforced concrete tower without primary steel framing is the most plausible configuration.

Multiple listings (3/20) identify a slab foundation, and none suggest an alternative like post-and-pier. Given the building’s concrete high-rise form and typical local construction practices, a concrete slab foundation is very likely even when not consistently noted by all agents.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings mark wood-frame construction and all identify concrete, matching the profile of a Waikiki concrete condo tower. Given the building type and market norms, it is very unlikely that the structure is wood frame.

The above-ground construction code is rarely used (3/20) and not supported by any narrative description, while the building clearly functions as a standard high-rise concrete tower. The sparse and inconsistent checkbox usage suggests these are likely agent input errors rather than a true building attribute.

There are no MLS checkbox selections or remarks referring to brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the building’s clear identification as a concrete high-rise, brick construction can be safely ruled out.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of single-wall construction, which would also be structurally incompatible with the described high-rise concrete building type. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not present.

Multiple listings explicitly prohibit short-term rentals, providing strong evidence that STRs are not permitted in the building. I searched for 'short-term', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', and similar terms and found explicit prohibition language.

Because STRs are prohibited, participation in a hotel rental pool is not applicable. I also searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and similar terms and found no references.

With short-term rentals prohibited and no references to hotel-managed rental programs, there is no evidence of mandatory participation in any rental/hotel pool. I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'must participate', and 'required to rent' and found none.

Multiple listings are silent on tenure, but one clearly advertises the unit as 'Fee Simple,' and none use leasehold-related language. Thus, the building definitely has fee simple units; among the sampled 20 listings, at least 1 is confirmed FS and 0 are explicitly LH.

None of the listings mention leasehold or lease rent, and no MLS entries are tagged as LH, while at least one listing is clearly Fee Simple. This consistent absence of leasehold indicators across many listings makes it very likely the building has no leasehold units.

The property is described as Fee Simple in the remarks, so land lease/leasehold does not apply. I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', and 'ground lease' and found none.

Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA-assumable financing and specific VA rates for buyers. This provides strong direct evidence that VA financing/assumability is offered for units in the building.

Multiple listings' public remarks explicitly state a full master insurance policy covering 100% of the building's replacement value (walls-in). Because the feature is stated directly in the remarks, I mark insured_fully = true with high confidence.

Amenity lists in remarks repeatedly call out features like swimming pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, and storage, but never fire sprinklers, and the MLS checkbox for sprinklers is unchecked in all 20 listings. This pattern indicates the building does not have a fire sprinkler system as a notable amenity.

I searched the public remarks for explicit language such as 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found nothing. With no current value provided and no mentions in remarks, I return false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it was not stated publicly).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Strong evidence the building offers ocean views: 18 of 20 current MLS listings include OCEAN in view_descriptions and the remarks repeatedly state "ocean", "harbor", "Magic Island", and "coastline" (examples: "Stunning ocean... coastline", "Million Dollar Views"). Multiple agents consistently describe direct ocean/front-row views, indicating building-level ocean views rather than isolated or copy-paste noise.

At least two separate listings explicitly describe mountain views from the building. MLS data also shows several agents checking the mountain view box. This indicates that some units, likely the mauka-facing stack, enjoy mountain vistas.

Across 20 listings, agents repeatedly detail specific views (ocean, harbor, coastline, city, mountains, sunsets) but never mention Diamond Head. MLS checkbox data also never indicates Diamond Head. Given how prominently Diamond Head is usually marketed when present, it is very likely this building does not offer notable Diamond Head views.

Evidence that the building offers city views: 9 of 20 MLS view_descriptions include CITY and remarks explicitly mention "city views" and urban access (examples: "city views", "gateway to Waikiki", proximity to shopping/Convention Center). Multiple listings from different agents reference city/downtown sightlines, supporting a building-level city view offering.

Listings describe 'coastline views' and 'stunning coastline' alongside ocean and marina vistas, particularly from higher-floor units. These repeated, specific references across multiple units indicate that portions of the building enjoy clear views along the shoreline. MLS data aligns with these remarks, supporting coastline as a true building-level view feature.

One listing mentions 'tree-top views towards the marina', but this is still framed around the marina and not a dedicated garden or courtyard outlook. Given the detailed emphasis on other view types and the absence of any garden/courtyard language in remarks or MLS data, garden views are unlikely to be a notable building feature.

Agents highlight many nearby and visible features—harbor, ocean, coastline, Magic Island, city, and mountains—but never refer to a golf course view. MLS data likewise never flags a golf course view. This strongly indicates the building does not offer meaningful golf course views.

Marina/harbor views are well-supported: 8 of 20 MLS view_descriptions list MARCAN and the public remarks repeatedly reference "harbor", "boat harbor", "Ilikai Boat Harbor", and "Ala Wai Harbor." Evidence appears in multiple listings from different agents and is explicitly described rather than implied.

Public remarks strongly focus on sunset exposure for the harbor/ocean-facing units. However, MLS checkbox data shows a minority of listings marked with SUNRIS, which is plausible for mountain/city-facing units in this location. This provides moderate evidence that some units offer sunrise views, even if they are less commonly marketed.

Clear evidence of sunset/western-facing views: 15 of 20 current MLS listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions and many remarks explicitly say "breathtaking sunsets", "enjoy breathtaking sunsets from the lanai", and "front row seats for Friday night fireworks". Consistent descriptions across listings indicate sunset views are a building feature.

Across all 20 listings, agents focus on harbor, ocean, coastline, parks, city, and mountain views, with no hint of cemetery outlooks. The building's described surroundings (Ala Wai Harbor, Ala Moana Beach Park, Waikiki, Ala Moana Center) also make a cemetery view unlikely. This provides very strong evidence that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

Several listings explicitly advertise views of weekly/Friday night fireworks from the unit/lanai and living areas. This is consistently mentioned across multiple remarks, supporting high confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least 5–6 listings clearly call Harbor View Plaza a pet-friendly building, consistently repeating a rule allowing one small pet (dog or cat) up to about 25 lbs. The repetition of the same rule across different agents and listings provides strong evidence that pets are allowed with size limits.

MLS checkbox data indicates a resident/on-site manager in 14 of 20 listings (historically high confidence). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'resident manager' or 'live-in manager', though multiple remarks reference 'strong management', 'secured building', or 'security'. With no clear contradictory evidence or agent corrections, the MLS prevalence supports including resident_manager=true.

Listings describe the property as a condo suitable for residence or investment, but never reference hotel programs, nightly rentals, or hotel management. In Waikiki, true condotels are typically marketed explicitly as such, so this omission across all remarks strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

The property is explicitly described as 'Fee Simple' and marketed like a standard condominium, with no reference to cooperative ownership or purchasing shares. Co-ops are rare in this market and are usually clearly labeled, so the consistent absence of such language supports that this is not a co-op building.