Harbor View Plaza

All 20 listings consistently report the building’s year built as 1968 in the MLS data. No remarks contradict this, so 1968 is accepted as the construction year with high confidence.

County parcel records and the state registration both report 16 floors. Listings reach only floor 13 and have no penthouse listings, so they do not establish the top residential floor.

The county parcel record and the state registration each report 140 residential units for this single-building record.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 101. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks were searched for explicit references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none were found. Because the current value is 2 and there is no contradictory evidence, it is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks describe split A/C and individual air conditioning units within condos, implying unit-level systems rather than building-supplied central A/C. With no MLS indications that central A/C is included in fees, it is very likely not a fee-covered building service.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention cable or bulk cable/internet being included in the maintenance fee. The repeated wording appears across multiple listings and agents, and the 18/20 MLS prevalence strongly confirms cable inclusion.

No listing remarks directly state that common-area electricity or building power is included. However, OTCOEX appears in 12 of 20 current MLS records, which moderately supports inclusion but may reflect checkbox carryover or inconsistent agent data.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium, not a cooperative, and no listing mentions co-op or cooperative taxes. With no MLS flags for COOTAX, it is safe to conclude cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Several listings explicitly enumerate included utilities as cable, internet, water, and sewer, without mentioning electricity. Combined with all MLS records leaving ELECTR unchecked, this strongly indicates that individual unit electric bills are not included in the maintenance fee.

None of the public remarks mention gas service, and no MLS records indicate gas as an included fee item. This makes it highly likely that gas (if present at all) is not a utility covered by the maintenance fee.

Only 2 of 20 current listings identify hot water as included, and the provided remarks do not explicitly say that building hot water is included. Conversely, at least 6 remarks mention individual or tankless water heaters, creating substantial conflict; the feature is retained because the historical determination was high confidence and HOTWAT remains present in current MLS data.

Internet inclusion is supported by 15 of 20 current MLS listings and repeated remarks such as "maintenance fees that cover internet, cable, sewer, and water" and "Cable and Internet." Although some language is repeated across listings, the current checkbox prevalence and multiple explicit confirmations provide strong evidence.

Listings frequently mention marina and harbor views, but never describe marina access, boat slips, or related fees as part of the HOA. With no MLS markers for MARINA, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention sewer as included in the maintenance fee. The remarks repeat this across multiple listing versions and agents, while unanimous MLS coding provides exceptionally strong confirmation.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention water being included in the maintenance fee. The repeated statements across multiple listings and agents, together with 20/20 MLS support, make water inclusion highly reliable.

At least 10 current remarks explicitly mention a building BBQ, BBQ area, or BBQ amenities, often alongside the pool and picnic area. The language appears across multiple listings and agents, with some repeated copy, but the repeated independent confirmations and 18/20 MLS amenity entries strongly support that the building offers BBQ facilities.

Public remarks from multiple agents note on-site bicycle storage, using phrases like 'surfboard/bicycle racks', 'bike/surfboard storage', and 'Surfboard/Bicycle Racks are available on property'. These consistent, specific references across different listings indicate that the building has shared bicycle storage facilities, even though the MLS bike storage checkbox is not being used. Given the strength and repetition of these remarks, bike storage should be considered an established building amenity.

Listings describe 'beautiful Ocean, Marina overlooking the boat harbor' and views of Ala Wai Harbor, indicating visual proximity rather than dedicated docking facilities. Without explicit boat dock or marina language, it is very likely the building lacks its own boat dock.

At least 6 supplied remarks explicitly identify a building car wash or car wash amenity, with repeated wording across multiple listings: 'car wash' and 'Amenities include ... car wash.' The remarks corroborate the 4/20 current MLS records and support the prior high-confidence conclusion.

Where agents would typically highlight a clubhouse, they instead focus on pool, BBQ, picnic area, and storage. The lack of any clubhouse terminology across many remarks and MLS supports that no clubhouse amenity exists.

Across many differently worded listings, there is no suggestion of concierge or front-desk services, and the corresponding MLS amenity is never used. This consistent absence in both narrative and checkbox data makes it very likely that the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently describe pet rules (1 dog or 1 cat, 25 lbs max) but never a dedicated pet exercise area. This strongly suggests pet ownership is allowed without any on-site dog park facility.

Despite extensive descriptions of location, views, and building features, no agent mentions a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS amenity is never selected. For this mid-market Waikiki condo, that omission plus the chosen wording strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents list amenities like pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but never a gym or fitness center. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkmarks, this strongly indicates the building does not have an exercise room.

Even high-end feature descriptions focus on views and unit upgrades, with no hint of building-provided transportation services. This makes it almost certain there is no limousine or house car service.

The building has prior explicit evidence of a meeting room/conference room amenity, with historical remarks stating 'Amenities- Swimming pool, Separate storage locker, meeting room, security guard...'. Across the current listing remarks, the amenity is not re-mentioned, but the absence does not outweigh the earlier explicit reference. This appears to be a building-level amenity that may simply be omitted from many agent remarks rather than copied consistently.

Patio/deck-style outdoor space is strongly supported across the listings, with numerous remarks explicitly mentioning a lanai, including "private lanai," "private-covered lanai," and "covered lanai." The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agents, together with the prior high-confidence determination and 6/20 current MLS amenity entries, confirm that the building offers lanai/outdoor-space features.

References to walking paths clearly relate to surrounding parks and area amenities, not building property. With no explicit on-site trail or path mentioned, the building is treated as not having a jogging/walking path amenity.

Amenity descriptions focus on adult-oriented features like pool, BBQ, and car wash, with no mention of kids’ play structures. This makes it very likely the building does not offer a playground.

All outdoor space references are to lanais (balconies) rather than any type of yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Combined with the high-rise urban setting and absence of the PRIYAR amenity in MLS across 20 listings, this strongly suggests that private yards are not a feature of this building.

Across all detailed amenity write-ups, golf or putting facilities are never cited. Given how prominently such a feature would be marketed, this is strong evidence that no putting green exists.

At least three listings state 'Amenities include ... picnic area' or similar, indicating a designated outdoor common area for leisure. Even though MLS does not flag RECARE, the consistent 'picnic area' language shows the building provides a recreation area.

Amenity paragraphs highlight pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but do not mention any rec room or game room. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building lacks a dedicated recreation room.

Agents consistently market the location as 'steps away' from restaurants at Ala Moana Center and Waikiki, not as having its own dining facility. This strongly indicates there is no on-site restaurant amenity.

View descriptions are always tied to individual lanais or unit orientation, not a shared roof deck or rooftop terrace. With no remark or MLS evidence, it is very likely there are no rooftop amenities.

Agents provide detailed amenity overviews yet never refer to any sauna or steam facility. This strongly suggests the building does not offer a sauna.

At least 18 current remarks explicitly mention storage, using phrases such as “extra storage unit in the garage,” “separate large storage locker,” “bonus extra storage locker,” “exterior storage closet,” and “private storage unit.” The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, although some repeated wording appears to be copied from prior listings; the breadth of independent storage references and MLS data confirms the feature.

Dedicated surfboard storage is repeatedly and directly documented in the remarks. The listings describe racks and designated storage areas for surfboards and bicycles.

Agents repeatedly describe the building’s amenities but never refer to tennis courts or tennis facilities. The complete absence in both remarks and MLS checkboxes makes it very likely there is no tennis court at this property.

No supplied remark explicitly mentions a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. Nevertheless, 12 of 20 current listings include TRACHU and the feature was previously classified with high confidence, indicating likely building-level MLS data support, though the absence of explicit remark confirmation reduces certainty.

Parking is consistently described as assigned, covered, secured, or tandem, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. Given repeated detailed descriptions of parking without mentioning valet, it is very likely the building does not offer valet service.

Several agents describe 'gated assigned parking' and a 'secured entry', showing that access to the parking/entry area is controlled by a physical gate or enclosure. Even without MLS GATED/WALFEN checked, these repeated descriptions across different listings support that the property has a gated/perimeter-type physical barrier.

Amenity lists consistently name only a pool, with no secondary hot-tub-type feature. Given how marketable a whirlpool would be, its absence in remarks and MLS strongly indicates it is not present.

At least 12 listings explicitly mention the building pool, with multiple independent remarks describing it as a shared/community amenity. Key phrases include 'Amenities include swimming pool,' 'community swimming pool,' 'HVP also provides generous amenities including... private pool,' and 'including a swimming pool,' so the evidence is strong and consistent across agents rather than relying only on copied MLS checkbox data.

Across all provided remarks, the pool is never described as heated and is only referred to generically as a 'swimming pool' or 'pool to cool off.' MLS data for 20 listings also shows no heated-pool indicators, so there is no support for a heated pool feature at this building.

A swimming pool is repeatedly documented as a building amenity. The remarks do not establish that the pool is salt water.

In-unit laundry is strongly validated across the building: 18/20 current listings include WASHER/DRYER, and numerous remarks explicitly mention “in-unit washer/dryer,” “full size W/D in unit,” or a “washer/dryer combo.” The repeated confirmations across multiple units and listing agents support that this is a legitimate building-level feature rather than a single copy-pasted claim.

None of the MLS records for this building mark community laundry as an amenity, and no remarks mention a shared laundry room or coin laundry. Amenities lists instead focus on pool, BBQ, car wash, storage, and bike/surfboard racks, while stressing in-unit washer/dryers, indicating there is likely no community laundry facility.

The listings focus on in-unit laundry and do not identify community laundry facilities. There is no evidence that any shared laundry requires payment.

The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washers and dryers, but do not describe shared laundry facilities. No evidence indicates that laundry is available on every floor.

Parking is clearly present across the building with very strong, repeated support. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention parking in forms like "assigned open parking," "dedicated parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," "covered parking," and "gated assigned parking." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

At least 10 listings explicitly mention assigned, designated, or reserved parking, including assigned covered stalls, an assigned open stall, and gated assigned parking. The evidence appears across multiple distinct listings and agents, strongly confirming that the building offers assigned parking.

At least 10 listings explicitly mention covered, garage, or secured covered parking, including assigned covered stalls, covered garage parking, and two covered tandem spaces. The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agents provide strong building-level evidence that covered parking is available.

Multiple listings confirm that units have assigned or covered parking stalls. However, the remarks do not establish that the parking is deeded or owned with the unit, so deeded status remains unsupported.

None of the 20 current MLS entries check any EV charging feature, and no agent remarks mention EV chargers, Tesla stations, or similar amenities. Given how consistently other amenities are advertised, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer EV charging stations.

The remarks describe assigned, covered, secured, open, and tandem parking arrangements but provide no parking fee amount. Searches for monthly parking charges and additional parking costs found no evidence.

No listings mark guest parking in MLS, and the only guest-related reference is to public street parking, not on-site guest stalls. The absence of any mention of dedicated guest parking across many remarks makes it very likely the building does not provide its own guest parking area.

Secure parking or secured access is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, with at least 8 listings mentioning secure entry, a secured building, gated parking, or resident-only secure parking access. The evidence is broader than the two MLS checkbox records, indicating the checkbox data likely understates this building feature.

At least one listing specifically advertises “two covered tandem parking on the first floor,” and a couple of MLS entries are coded TANDEM. This shows that some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls, making tandem parking an available building feature.

Across all provided remarks, agents highlight many amenities but never mention valet or attended parking, and no MLS entry checks a valet feature. This consistent omission is strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking service.

Listings generally describe parking as assigned or included with individual units, with some units having covered or tandem stalls. No evidence of a building parking waitlist system was found.

Listings highlight a 'secured building', 'secured entry', and gated parking but are completely silent about keyed or fob-access elevators. Combined with the absence of any MLS checkbox usage for this feature, it is very likely the elevators are not access-controlled in this way.

The building is repeatedly described as secure or having secured entry. However, no listing specifies a card- or fob-based security system.

Security guard service is strongly supported by current MLS data, with SECGUA selected in 16 of 20 listings. At least four remarks explicitly mention security amenities, including “security guard” and “Resident Manager, security,” although some “secured building” language may be copied boilerplate; the combination of the high historical confidence and widespread checkbox presence is compelling.

The remarks mention building security and, in one listing, a security guard. They do not state that the property provides a security patrol service.

Across all supplied remarks, there are no references to cameras, CCTV, or video surveillance, and the MLS security-system checkbox is never used. Given that agents do emphasize other security features, the absence of any mention of video monitoring indicates this feature is very likely not present.

Across all provided remarks there are no mentions of 'central AC' or centralized HVAC; instead, units are described with their own A/C or split AC systems. Current MLS data shows just 1 of 20 listings flagged for central AC, which strongly suggests that was an agent error rather than a true building-wide system. Given the consistent pattern of individual systems, the building is very unlikely to have central air conditioning.

At least 5 listings explicitly mention split AC, including "Split A/C," "brand-new split AC," and "this unit features a split AC." The evidence appears across multiple unit descriptions and is consistent with the prior High-confidence determination, supporting that split AC is available in some units at the building.

Approximately 8-10 listings mention air conditioning or cooling, including “Split A/C,” “brand-new split AC,” “whisper quiet AC,” and “A/C.” Combined with ACWIUN appearing in 12 of 20 current listings, the evidence supports that the building offers air-conditioning units, although the remarks do not consistently identify them specifically as window units.

Concrete construction is supported by 18 of 20 current listings using the MLS code "CONCRE," consistent with the prior high-confidence determination. No public remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, but the evidence is strong across the listing set and does not indicate a change.

Double-wall construction is indicated by 11 of 20 current MLS listings using the code "DOUWAL," matching the prior medium-confidence evidence. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction, so this appears to be MLS field evidence without independent narrative confirmation.

No listing identifies hollow tile construction or mentions it in narrative remarks. With universal selection of concrete and no evidence of hollow tile, this construction type is unlikely for the primary structure.

Masonry/stucco is rarely selected in MLS (2 of 20) and never appears in the public remarks, whereas concrete is universally indicated. Given the low and inconsistent signal and lack of descriptive support, we treat masonry/stucco construction as not a defining building feature.

No listings mark steel frame construction and all agree on concrete, with no narrative references to steel framing. For this vintage and location, a reinforced concrete tower without primary steel framing is the most plausible configuration.

Three of 20 current listings mark “SLAB,” compared with the previously noted four of 20. Public remarks do not mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation, so the feature remains only weakly supported by inconsistent MLS checkbox data.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings mark wood-frame construction and all identify concrete, matching the profile of a Waikiki concrete condo tower. Given the building type and market norms, it is very unlikely that the structure is wood frame.

Only three of 20 listings identify “ABOGRO,” down from the previously noted four of 20. None of the supplied remarks mentions above-ground construction or above-ground materials, so support is limited and may reflect inconsistent MLS data rather than independently verified building information.

There are no MLS checkbox selections or remarks referring to brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the building’s clear identification as a concrete high-rise, brick construction can be safely ruled out.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of single-wall construction, which would also be structurally incompatible with the described high-rise concrete building type. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not present.

Short-term rentals are expressly prohibited in the remarks. This direct restriction is high-confidence evidence that STRs are not allowed in the building.

Because short-term rentals are not allowed, participation in a hotel rental pool cannot apply under the stated rules. The remarks also contain no evidence of a hotel rental program.

Mandatory hotel-pool participation cannot apply when short-term rentals are prohibited. No listing mentions required participation in a rental pool or any comparable mandatory program.

Multiple listings are silent on tenure, but one clearly advertises the unit as 'Fee Simple,' and none use leasehold-related language. Thus, the building definitely has fee simple units; among the sampled 20 listings, at least 1 is confirmed FS and 0 are explicitly LH.

None of the listings mention leasehold or lease rent, and no MLS entries are tagged as LH, while at least one listing is clearly Fee Simple. This consistent absence of leasehold indicators across many listings makes it very likely the building has no leasehold units.

The property is identified as fee simple, so a leasehold expiration year is not applicable. Searches for lease expiry, land lease, ground lease, and renewal language found no specific year.

The building is repeatedly marketed as offering VA assumable loans for eligible or qualified buyers. The repeated explicit references across listings provide overwhelming evidence that VA financing is available.

Several listings explicitly describe full master insurance coverage for 100% of the building's replacement value. These repeated statements provide strong, consistent evidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.

Amenity lists in remarks repeatedly call out features like swimming pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, and storage, but never fire sprinklers, and the MLS checkbox for sprinklers is unchecked in all 20 listings. This pattern indicates the building does not have a fire sprinkler system as a notable amenity.

The remarks were searched for terms such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection," but none were found. References to fireworks do not constitute fire/life safety certification evidence, so the feature is set to false with moderate-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly confirmed across the building, with 16 of 20 current listings mentioning OCEAN. Remarks include “stunning ocean,” “direct ocean view,” “ocean & harbor views,” and “panoramic views...across the Pacific Ocean,” appearing across multiple listings and agents.

At least two separate listings explicitly describe mountain views from the building. MLS data also shows several agents checking the mountain view box. This indicates that some units, likely the mauka-facing stack, enjoy mountain vistas.

Across 20 listings, agents repeatedly detail specific views (ocean, harbor, coastline, city, mountains, sunsets) but never mention Diamond Head. MLS checkbox data also never indicates Diamond Head. Given how prominently Diamond Head is usually marketed when present, it is very likely this building does not offer notable Diamond Head views.

City views are confirmed in 10 of 20 current listings, including explicit phrases such as “skyline of urban Kakaako,” “city views,” and “ocean, city and mountain views.” Although less frequently mentioned than ocean views, the feature is supported by multiple detailed remarks across the building.

Coastline views are confirmed in 3 of 20 listings, particularly for higher-floor units. Key remarks include "ocean, boat harbor... coastline" views and "stunning coastline" views, providing explicit support despite the feature appearing less often than the other views.

One listing mentions 'tree-top views towards the marina', but this is still framed around the marina and not a dedicated garden or courtyard outlook. Given the detailed emphasis on other view types and the absence of any garden/courtyard language in remarks or MLS data, garden views are unlikely to be a notable building feature.

Agents highlight many nearby and visible features—harbor, ocean, coastline, Magic Island, city, and mountains—but never refer to a golf course view. MLS data likewise never flags a golf course view. This strongly indicates the building does not offer meaningful golf course views.

Marina or harbor views are strongly established across the building, with 15 of 20 current MLS listings carrying the MARCAN designation and numerous independent remarks explicitly mentioning marina, boat harbor, yacht harbor, or Ala Wai Harbor views. The repeated detailed descriptions across multiple units and agents confirm this is a legitimate building-level feature rather than a single copied remark.

Public remarks strongly focus on sunset exposure for the harbor/ocean-facing units. However, MLS checkbox data shows a minority of listings marked with SUNRIS, which is plausible for mountain/city-facing units in this location. This provides moderate evidence that some units offer sunrise views, even if they are less commonly marketed.

Sunset views are strongly confirmed, with 16 of 20 current listings mentioning SUNSET. Key remarks include “breathtaking sunsets from the lanai,” “spectacular sunsets nightly,” “golden sunsets looking out across the Pacific Ocean,” and “gorgeous sunset view right from your lanai,” demonstrating broad support across listings.

Across all 20 listings, agents focus on harbor, ocean, coastline, parks, city, and mountain views, with no hint of cemetery outlooks. The building's described surroundings (Ala Wai Harbor, Ala Moana Beach Park, Waikiki, Ala Moana Center) also make a cemetery view unlikely. This provides very strong evidence that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

The listings repeatedly confirm that fireworks are visible from inside units and private lanais. This is direct, consistent evidence of a building fireworks view.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least 5–6 listings clearly call Harbor View Plaza a pet-friendly building, consistently repeating a rule allowing one small pet (dog or cat) up to about 25 lbs. The repetition of the same rule across different agents and listings provides strong evidence that pets are allowed with size limits.

At least 2 current listings explicitly mention the feature, including "Resident Manager" and "on-site management." The MLS amenity is checked in 13 of 20 listings, and the remarks support that this is a genuine building-level amenity rather than an isolated copy-paste error.

Listings describe the property as a condo suitable for residence or investment, but never reference hotel programs, nightly rentals, or hotel management. In Waikiki, true condotels are typically marketed explicitly as such, so this omission across all remarks strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

The property is explicitly described as 'Fee Simple' and marketed like a standard condominium, with no reference to cooperative ownership or purchasing shares. Co-ops are rare in this market and are usually clearly labeled, so the consistent absence of such language supports that this is not a co-op building.