Harbor View Plaza

All 20 listings consistently report the building’s year built as 1968 in the MLS data. No remarks contradict this, so 1968 is accepted as the construction year with high confidence.

Across 20 listings, the highest reported unit floor is 13, and no remarks indicate penthouse, top floor, or a taller tower. Following the guidance to use the maximum observed floor when no explicit building height is stated, the building is treated as 13 stories.

No listing remarks describe the building as having a specific number of units (e.g., '109-unit building'), and the MLS unit-count field is uniformly 0, suggesting missing data rather than an actual size. The true total unit count is effectively unknown based on current evidence.

I searched for a precise owner-occupancy figure such as "80% owner occupied" or another stated percentage, but found none. One remark does describe "high owner occupancy," which suggests stronger owner-occupancy than a generic investor-heavy building, but it is not enough to replace the current numeric value.

I searched the public remarks for references such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a stated number of elevators, but found none. Per the rules, the current value is kept because there is no remark-level evidence to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks describe split A/C and individual air conditioning units within condos, implying unit-level systems rather than building-supplied central A/C. With no MLS indications that central A/C is included in fees, it is very likely not a fee-covered building service.

Cable is strongly supported across many listings and appears to be a consistent building-wide fee inclusion. At least 3 separate remarks explicitly reference cable, often bundled with internet, sewer, and water, suggesting repeat confirmation rather than a one-off agent note.

Evidence for common-area electricity is weak. Only 12/20 MLS records show OTCOEX, and the public remarks repeatedly mention internet, water, and sewer but not common electric or hallway/elevator power. This looks like partial MLS checkbox usage rather than a consistently verified building expense.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium, not a cooperative, and no listing mentions co-op or cooperative taxes. With no MLS flags for COOTAX, it is safe to conclude cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Several listings explicitly enumerate included utilities as cable, internet, water, and sewer, without mentioning electricity. Combined with all MLS records leaving ELECTR unchecked, this strongly indicates that individual unit electric bills are not included in the maintenance fee.

None of the public remarks mention gas service, and no MLS records indicate gas as an included fee item. This makes it highly likely that gas (if present at all) is not a utility covered by the maintenance fee.

Hot water is strongly contradicted. The MLS shows 0/20 listings with HOTWAT and many with WTRHTR, while remarks explicitly say things like “tankless water heater,” “on-demand hot-water heater,” and “water heater (2022).” This is consistent across multiple listings and strongly indicates hot water is not included in maintenance fees.

Internet inclusion is well supported. The MLS shows 13/20 listings with INTSER, and remarks repeatedly say “Cable and Internet” and “maintenance fee includes Hawaiian Telcom bulk cable/internet.” The repeated phrasing across multiple listings suggests this is a real building-wide inclusion rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

Listings frequently mention marina and harbor views, but never describe marina access, boat slips, or related fees as part of the HOA. With no MLS markers for MARINA, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

Sewer inclusion is consistently confirmed. The MLS shows 20/20 listings with SEWER, and remarks repeatedly mention “water, sewer” and “maintenance fees that cover internet, cable, sewer, and water.” This is uniform across the building and appears highly reliable.

Water inclusion is clearly established. The MLS shows 20/20 listings with WATER, and the public remarks repeatedly say fees cover “water” alongside sewer and internet. The consistency across listings and agents makes this a very high-confidence building feature.

BBQ is strongly supported by both MLS data and many public remarks. Multiple listings mention "BBQ," "BBQ area," or "Amenities include... BBQ," indicating a shared building amenity across the property. The evidence is consistent across many agents, not just a one-off mention.

Public remarks from multiple agents note on-site bicycle storage, using phrases like 'surfboard/bicycle racks', 'bike/surfboard storage', and 'Surfboard/Bicycle Racks are available on property'. These consistent, specific references across different listings indicate that the building has shared bicycle storage facilities, even though the MLS bike storage checkbox is not being used. Given the strength and repetition of these remarks, bike storage should be considered an established building amenity.

Listings describe 'beautiful Ocean, Marina overlooking the boat harbor' and views of Ala Wai Harbor, indicating visual proximity rather than dedicated docking facilities. Without explicit boat dock or marina language, it is very likely the building lacks its own boat dock.

Car wash facilities are directly mentioned in several listings, including amenity lists that say "BBQ, car wash" or "Amenities include... car wash." The repetition across listings suggests this is a real shared building amenity, even if not checked in every MLS record.

Where agents would typically highlight a clubhouse, they instead focus on pool, BBQ, picnic area, and storage. The lack of any clubhouse terminology across many remarks and MLS supports that no clubhouse amenity exists.

Across many differently worded listings, there is no suggestion of concierge or front-desk services, and the corresponding MLS amenity is never used. This consistent absence in both narrative and checkbox data makes it very likely that the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently describe pet rules (1 dog or 1 cat, 25 lbs max) but never a dedicated pet exercise area. This strongly suggests pet ownership is allowed without any on-site dog park facility.

Despite extensive descriptions of location, views, and building features, no agent mentions a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS amenity is never selected. For this mid-market Waikiki condo, that omission plus the chosen wording strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents list amenities like pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but never a gym or fitness center. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkmarks, this strongly indicates the building does not have an exercise room.

Even high-end feature descriptions focus on views and unit upgrades, with no hint of building-provided transportation services. This makes it almost certain there is no limousine or house car service.

The building has prior explicit evidence of a meeting room/conference room amenity, with historical remarks stating 'Amenities- Swimming pool, Separate storage locker, meeting room, security guard...'. Across the current listing remarks, the amenity is not re-mentioned, but the absence does not outweigh the earlier explicit reference. This appears to be a building-level amenity that may simply be omitted from many agent remarks rather than copied consistently.

Strong evidence that Harbor View Plaza offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Well over a dozen listings mention a 'private lanai,' 'covered lanai,' or simply 'lanai,' with several also describing enjoying sunsets, fireworks, and breezes from that space. The consistency across many listings and agents makes this a high-confidence feature for the building.

References to walking paths clearly relate to surrounding parks and area amenities, not building property. With no explicit on-site trail or path mentioned, the building is treated as not having a jogging/walking path amenity.

Amenity descriptions focus on adult-oriented features like pool, BBQ, and car wash, with no mention of kids’ play structures. This makes it very likely the building does not offer a playground.

All outdoor space references are to lanais (balconies) rather than any type of yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Combined with the high-rise urban setting and absence of the PRIYAR amenity in MLS across 20 listings, this strongly suggests that private yards are not a feature of this building.

Across all detailed amenity write-ups, golf or putting facilities are never cited. Given how prominently such a feature would be marketed, this is strong evidence that no putting green exists.

At least three listings state 'Amenities include ... picnic area' or similar, indicating a designated outdoor common area for leisure. Even though MLS does not flag RECARE, the consistent 'picnic area' language shows the building provides a recreation area.

Amenity paragraphs highlight pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but do not mention any rec room or game room. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building lacks a dedicated recreation room.

Agents consistently market the location as 'steps away' from restaurants at Ala Moana Center and Waikiki, not as having its own dining facility. This strongly indicates there is no on-site restaurant amenity.

View descriptions are always tied to individual lanais or unit orientation, not a shared roof deck or rooftop terrace. With no remark or MLS evidence, it is very likely there are no rooftop amenities.

Agents provide detailed amenity overviews yet never refer to any sauna or steam facility. This strongly suggests the building does not offer a sauna.

Storage units/lockers are strongly supported for Harbor View Plaza. Multiple current listings explicitly mention storage in different forms, including "storage locker," "extra storage unit in the garage," "private storage unit," and "additional storage" or "extra storage space," indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The repeated mentions across many listings align with the high historical MLS signal.

Surfboard storage is directly supported by multiple listings. The remarks mention dedicated surfboard storage areas, surfboard/bicycle racks, and similar storage for water-sport equipment.

Agents repeatedly describe the building’s amenities but never refer to tennis courts or tennis facilities. The complete absence in both remarks and MLS checkboxes makes it very likely there is no tennis court at this property.

Trash chute is supported by both MLS data and public remarks. One listing explicitly states the building has "trash chute," while the MLS shows it in 13/20 listings, suggesting it is a real shared building feature. The evidence is strong enough to include confidently.

Parking is consistently described as assigned, covered, secured, or tandem, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. Given repeated detailed descriptions of parking without mentioning valet, it is very likely the building does not offer valet service.

Several agents describe 'gated assigned parking' and a 'secured entry', showing that access to the parking/entry area is controlled by a physical gate or enclosure. Even without MLS GATED/WALFEN checked, these repeated descriptions across different listings support that the property has a gated/perimeter-type physical barrier.

Amenity lists consistently name only a pool, with no secondary hot-tub-type feature. Given how marketable a whirlpool would be, its absence in remarks and MLS strongly indicates it is not present.

Pool is strongly supported across the listing remarks: well over 10 listings explicitly mention a "swimming pool," and one calls out a "private pool." The mentions appear across multiple agents and listing styles, so this looks like a real shared building amenity rather than copied checkbox data.

Across all provided remarks, the pool is never described as heated and is only referred to generically as a 'swimming pool' or 'pool to cool off.' MLS data for 20 listings also shows no heated-pool indicators, so there is no support for a heated pool feature at this building.

I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and similar terms. The listings mention a pool multiple times, but never identify it as salt water, so this cannot be confirmed from the remarks.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported for Harbor View Plaza. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention it, including "In-unit washer/dryer," "full size W/D in unit," "washer and dryer conveniently located in living space," and a recent listing noting a "new washer, dryer" installation. The evidence is consistent across many listings and looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste MLS checkbox artifact.

None of the MLS records for this building mark community laundry as an amenity, and no remarks mention a shared laundry room or coin laundry. Amenities lists instead focus on pool, BBQ, car wash, storage, and bike/surfboard racks, while stressing in-unit washer/dryers, indicating there is likely no community laundry facility.

I looked for coin-op, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, and similar wording. The remarks consistently reference in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public-remarks evidence that community laundry is paid.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The listings instead repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.

Parking is clearly present across the building with very strong, repeated support. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention parking in forms like "assigned open parking," "dedicated parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," "covered parking," and "gated assigned parking." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly use phrases like "assigned open parking," "assigned covered parking stall," "gated assigned parking," and "dedicated parking stall," indicating this is a real building feature. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides covered parking: at least a dozen (≈15+) listings explicitly reference covered or secured parking (quotes include "assigned covered parking stall", "1 covered corner parking stall", "covered, secured parking", "covered tandem parking"). These references are widespread among different listings/agents, indicating the feature is building-wide.

I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like deeded stall, owned parking, or parking included in the deed. The remarks only describe assigned/covered/tandem stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the public text.

None of the 20 current MLS entries check any EV charging feature, and no agent remarks mention EV chargers, Tesla stations, or similar amenities. Given how consistently other amenities are advertised, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer EV charging stations.

I looked for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, rental fee, or additional parking cost. Nothing in the remarks indicates a separate parking fee.

No listings mark guest parking in MLS, and the only guest-related reference is to public street parking, not on-site guest stalls. The absence of any mention of dedicated guest parking across many remarks makes it very likely the building does not provide its own guest parking area.

Moderately strong evidence: at least 8 listings mention secure or gated access (examples: 'Secure entry', 'secured building', 'secure gated assigned covered parking space', 'covered parking that has secure access to residents'). Multiple agents reference building security and gated/secure parking rather than a single isolated claim, supporting inclusion.

At least one listing specifically advertises “two covered tandem parking on the first floor,” and a couple of MLS entries are coded TANDEM. This shows that some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls, making tandem parking an available building feature.

Across all provided remarks, agents highlight many amenities but never mention valet or attended parking, and no MLS entry checks a valet feature. This consistent omission is strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking service.

I searched for parking waitlist terminology and found no references to a waitlist system. The listings simply describe assigned, covered, or tandem parking stalls.

Listings highlight a 'secured building', 'secured entry', and gated parking but are completely silent about keyed or fob-access elevators. Combined with the absence of any MLS checkbox usage for this feature, it is very likely the elevators are not access-controlled in this way.

I looked for key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. The remarks show the building is secured, but they do not explicitly state a card/fob security system.

Security guard service appears to be a genuine building feature. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention "security guard," "security," "secured building," or "secured access," and this aligns with the historical MLS data (16/20 listings with SECGUA). The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, suggesting this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.

I searched for security patrol language such as "patrol service," "roving security," or "patrolled building." The remarks only mention security, security guard, and secure entry, which are not the same as patrol service.

Across all supplied remarks, there are no references to cameras, CCTV, or video surveillance, and the MLS security-system checkbox is never used. Given that agents do emphasize other security features, the absence of any mention of video monitoring indicates this feature is very likely not present.

Across all provided remarks there are no mentions of 'central AC' or centralized HVAC; instead, units are described with their own A/C or split AC systems. Current MLS data shows just 1 of 20 listings flagged for central AC, which strongly suggests that was an agent error rather than a true building-wide system. Given the consistent pattern of individual systems, the building is very unlikely to have central air conditioning.

There are several explicit mentions of split AC across the remarks, with at least 4–5 listings referencing it directly. The strongest phrases include "brand-new split AC," "split AC," and "the breezy unit has a split AC," which indicates this is a real building-level feature available in some units rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Evidence is moderate rather than explicit: 12 of 20 current MLS listings include ACWIUN, and multiple remarks mention cooling such as “A/C,” “whisper quiet AC,” and “brand-new split AC.” The remarks are not consistent on AC type, so this looks like building-level AC availability with some agent copy-paste noise rather than a fully explicit window-unit confirmation.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern: 20 of 20 current listings use CONCRE. This is consistent across multiple listings/agents and looks like a building-level fact rather than a one-off checkbox entry.

Double-wall construction appears in 11 of 20 current MLS listings, which suggests it may be a real building feature but not one that every agent notes. No public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar wording, so this is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than remark confirmation.

No listing identifies hollow tile construction or mentions it in narrative remarks. With universal selection of concrete and no evidence of hollow tile, this construction type is unlikely for the primary structure.

Masonry/stucco is rarely selected in MLS (2 of 20) and never appears in the public remarks, whereas concrete is universally indicated. Given the low and inconsistent signal and lack of descriptive support, we treat masonry/stucco construction as not a defining building feature.

No listings mark steel frame construction and all agree on concrete, with no narrative references to steel framing. For this vintage and location, a reinforced concrete tower without primary steel framing is the most plausible configuration.

Slab foundation is supported by a subset of current listings, with 4 of 20 marking SLAB. Public remarks do not explicitly mention the foundation, but there is also no contrary evidence such as post-and-pier or another foundation type. This is a building-level feature buyers may still want to know about, though the evidence is not unanimous.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings mark wood-frame construction and all identify concrete, matching the profile of a Waikiki concrete condo tower. Given the building type and market norms, it is very unlikely that the structure is wood frame.

Above-ground construction is weakly supported by the MLS data, with 4 of 20 listings carrying ABOGRO. The remarks are silent on this feature, so this appears to be a low-frequency MLS designation rather than a broadly described amenity, but there is not enough evidence to mark it false.

There are no MLS checkbox selections or remarks referring to brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the building’s clear identification as a concrete high-rise, brick construction can be safely ruled out.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of single-wall construction, which would also be structurally incompatible with the described high-rise concrete building type. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not present.

The public remarks directly deny short-term rentals in the building. That is strong evidence that STRs are not allowed.

I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed, or similar rental-program language and found none. Because the remarks explicitly say short-term rentals are not allowed, a hotel pool cannot apply.

I looked for language about required participation, cannot opt out, or mandatory rental programs and found none. Since STRs are explicitly prohibited, mandatory pool participation is also false.

Multiple listings are silent on tenure, but one clearly advertises the unit as 'Fee Simple,' and none use leasehold-related language. Thus, the building definitely has fee simple units; among the sampled 20 listings, at least 1 is confirmed FS and 0 are explicitly LH.

None of the listings mention leasehold or lease rent, and no MLS entries are tagged as LH, while at least one listing is clearly Fee Simple. This consistent absence of leasehold indicators across many listings makes it very likely the building has no leasehold units.

I looked for leasehold terms such as lease expiry year, ground lease end date, renewal, or extension language and found none. The public remarks instead describe the property as fee simple, so there is no lease expiration year to extract.

The listings repeatedly advertise VA assumable loans and VA-qualified buyer financing. This is direct, repeated public evidence that VA financing is supported for this building.

The remarks repeatedly and explicitly indicate full building coverage, including language that the master policy covers 100% of replacement value. That is strong evidence the HOA/building is fully insured by walls-in/full master coverage.

Amenity lists in remarks repeatedly call out features like swimming pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, and storage, but never fire sprinklers, and the MLS checkbox for sprinklers is unchecked in all 20 listings. This pattern indicates the building does not have a fire sprinkler system as a notable amenity.

I looked for terms like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but none appeared in the remarks. With no public-remarks evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false/absent.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "ocean view," "direct ocean view," "ocean & harbor views," and "views of the Pacific Ocean," indicating this is not a copy-paste artifact but a recurring building-level feature.

At least two separate listings explicitly describe mountain views from the building. MLS data also shows several agents checking the mountain view box. This indicates that some units, likely the mauka-facing stack, enjoy mountain vistas.

Across 20 listings, agents repeatedly detail specific views (ocean, harbor, coastline, city, mountains, sunsets) but never mention Diamond Head. MLS checkbox data also never indicates Diamond Head. Given how prominently Diamond Head is usually marketed when present, it is very likely this building does not offer notable Diamond Head views.

City views are supported by both MLS history and current remarks. Several listings reference "city views," "urban Kakaako," "the lively city of Honolulu," and mixed views including city/harbor/ocean, showing that some units clearly offer urban skyline outlooks.

Listings describe 'coastline views' and 'stunning coastline' alongside ocean and marina vistas, particularly from higher-floor units. These repeated, specific references across multiple units indicate that portions of the building enjoy clear views along the shoreline. MLS data aligns with these remarks, supporting coastline as a true building-level view feature.

One listing mentions 'tree-top views towards the marina', but this is still framed around the marina and not a dedicated garden or courtyard outlook. Given the detailed emphasis on other view types and the absence of any garden/courtyard language in remarks or MLS data, garden views are unlikely to be a notable building feature.

Agents highlight many nearby and visible features—harbor, ocean, coastline, Magic Island, city, and mountains—but never refer to a golf course view. MLS data likewise never flags a golf course view. This strongly indicates the building does not offer meaningful golf course views.

Marina/harbor views are very strongly confirmed. Numerous remarks cite "Ala Wai Harbor," "boat harbor," "yacht harbor," "marina overlooking the boat harbor," and similar phrases, making this a recurring and reliable building feature.

Public remarks strongly focus on sunset exposure for the harbor/ocean-facing units. However, MLS checkbox data shows a minority of listings marked with SUNRIS, which is plausible for mountain/city-facing units in this location. This provides moderate evidence that some units offer sunrise views, even if they are less commonly marketed.

Sunset views are well supported across many listings. Remarks frequently use explicit phrases like "sunset views," "breathtaking sunsets," "golden sunsets," and "watch gorgeous sunset view right from your lanai," indicating strong and repeated marketing of this feature.

Across all 20 listings, agents focus on harbor, ocean, coastline, parks, city, and mountain views, with no hint of cemetery outlooks. The building's described surroundings (Ala Wai Harbor, Ala Moana Beach Park, Waikiki, Ala Moana Center) also make a cemetery view unlikely. This provides very strong evidence that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

The remarks repeatedly and clearly confirm fireworks views from units, not just proximity to fireworks. Multiple listings say you can see or enjoy Friday night fireworks from the lanai or living room.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least 5–6 listings clearly call Harbor View Plaza a pet-friendly building, consistently repeating a rule allowing one small pet (dog or cat) up to about 25 lbs. The repetition of the same rule across different agents and listings provides strong evidence that pets are allowed with size limits.

This feature is strongly supported. Historical MLS data showed 15/20 listings with RESMAN in amenities, and the current remarks include an explicit mention of "Resident Manager" in Harbor View Plaza. The evidence appears consistent with the building’s amenity set rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Listings describe the property as a condo suitable for residence or investment, but never reference hotel programs, nightly rentals, or hotel management. In Waikiki, true condotels are typically marketed explicitly as such, so this omission across all remarks strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

The property is explicitly described as 'Fee Simple' and marketed like a standard condominium, with no reference to cooperative ownership or purchasing shares. Co-ops are rare in this market and are usually clearly labeled, so the consistent absence of such language supports that this is not a co-op building.