Harbor View Plaza

All 20 listings consistently report the building’s year built as 1968 in the MLS data. No remarks contradict this, so 1968 is accepted as the construction year with high confidence.

Across 20 listings, the highest reported unit floor is 13, and no remarks indicate penthouse, top floor, or a taller tower. Following the guidance to use the maximum observed floor when no explicit building height is stated, the building is treated as 13 stories.

No listing remarks describe the building as having a specific number of units (e.g., '109-unit building'), and the MLS unit-count field is uniformly 0, suggesting missing data rather than an actual size. The true total unit count is effectively unknown based on current evidence.

I searched for a numeric owner-occupancy percentage such as '80% owner occupied' or similar, but found none. The remarks do suggest 'high owner occupancy,' yet that does not provide a precise percentage, so I kept the current value of 37.0 with low confidence.

I searched the public remarks for elevator-related language, including singular/plural references and phrases like 'multiple elevators,' but found nothing. Per the current building context, I am keeping the existing value of 2 with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks describe split A/C and individual air conditioning units within condos, implying unit-level systems rather than building-supplied central A/C. With no MLS indications that central A/C is included in fees, it is very likely not a fee-covered building service.

Strong, consistent evidence that the association fee includes cable/internet. Public remarks repeatedly state phrases like "Cable and Internet" and "Hawaiian Telcom bulk cable/internet," and the MLS checkbox is present in 20 of 20 current listings, indicating broad agreement across agents.

Evidence for common-area electricity is weak but present in the MLS: 12 of 20 listings have OTCOEX checked. None of the public remarks explicitly say common electric or building power is included, so this appears to rely on MLS data rather than agent remarks.

The building is consistently presented as a fee-simple condominium, not a cooperative, and no listing mentions co-op or cooperative taxes. With no MLS flags for COOTAX, it is safe to conclude cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Several listings explicitly enumerate included utilities as cable, internet, water, and sewer, without mentioning electricity. Combined with all MLS records leaving ELECTR unchecked, this strongly indicates that individual unit electric bills are not included in the maintenance fee.

None of the public remarks mention gas service, and no MLS records indicate gas as an included fee item. This makes it highly likely that gas (if present at all) is not a utility covered by the maintenance fee.

Public remarks repeatedly mention in-unit water heaters such as 'tankless water heater' and 'on-demand hot-water heater,' which is strong evidence against building-supplied hot water being included. The MLS also shows HOTWAT unchecked across all listings, reinforcing that this feature should be false.

This feature is well supported across multiple listings and agents. Remarks explicitly say 'maintenance fees cover internet' and 'Hawaiian Telcom bulk cable/internet,' so internet inclusion should remain true.

Listings frequently mention marina and harbor views, but never describe marina access, boat slips, or related fees as part of the HOA. With no MLS markers for MARINA, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fee.

Sewer inclusion is strongly and consistently supported. Several remarks explicitly state 'sewer' is covered in the maintenance fee, and the MLS shows 20/20 listings with sewer included.

Water inclusion is clearly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'water' or 'water included,' and the MLS shows 20/20 listings with WATER included.

BBQ facilities are strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings mention "bbq area," "BBQ," and "picnic area" as building amenities, which is consistent across different agents and not just a single copied description. This appears to be a stable shared building amenity.

Public remarks from multiple agents note on-site bicycle storage, using phrases like 'surfboard/bicycle racks', 'bike/surfboard storage', and 'Surfboard/Bicycle Racks are available on property'. These consistent, specific references across different listings indicate that the building has shared bicycle storage facilities, even though the MLS bike storage checkbox is not being used. Given the strength and repetition of these remarks, bike storage should be considered an established building amenity.

Listings describe 'beautiful Ocean, Marina overlooking the boat harbor' and views of Ala Wai Harbor, indicating visual proximity rather than dedicated docking facilities. Without explicit boat dock or marina language, it is very likely the building lacks its own boat dock.

Car wash facilities are confirmed by repeated public remarks. At least several listings list "car wash" among the building amenities, suggesting a real shared feature rather than a one-off error. The repeated mention across different remarks supports inclusion.

Where agents would typically highlight a clubhouse, they instead focus on pool, BBQ, picnic area, and storage. The lack of any clubhouse terminology across many remarks and MLS supports that no clubhouse amenity exists.

Across many differently worded listings, there is no suggestion of concierge or front-desk services, and the corresponding MLS amenity is never used. This consistent absence in both narrative and checkbox data makes it very likely that the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently describe pet rules (1 dog or 1 cat, 25 lbs max) but never a dedicated pet exercise area. This strongly suggests pet ownership is allowed without any on-site dog park facility.

Despite extensive descriptions of location, views, and building features, no agent mentions a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS amenity is never selected. For this mid-market Waikiki condo, that omission plus the chosen wording strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents list amenities like pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but never a gym or fitness center. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkmarks, this strongly indicates the building does not have an exercise room.

Even high-end feature descriptions focus on views and unit upgrades, with no hint of building-provided transportation services. This makes it almost certain there is no limousine or house car service.

Detailed amenity lists omit any meeting or conference room despite covering multiple smaller features like storage lockers and surfboard racks. The single MLS checkmark is likely a data error, so the building is treated as not having a meeting room.

Strong evidence that Harbor View Plaza offers patio/deck-style amenities. Well over a dozen listings mention a "private lanai," "covered lanai," or simply "lanai," often alongside phrases like "enjoy breathtaking sunsets from the lanai" and "off your private lanai." This is consistent across many different remarks, making the feature highly credible.

References to walking paths clearly relate to surrounding parks and area amenities, not building property. With no explicit on-site trail or path mentioned, the building is treated as not having a jogging/walking path amenity.

Amenity descriptions focus on adult-oriented features like pool, BBQ, and car wash, with no mention of kids’ play structures. This makes it very likely the building does not offer a playground.

All outdoor space references are to lanais (balconies) rather than any type of yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Combined with the high-rise urban setting and absence of the PRIYAR amenity in MLS across 20 listings, this strongly suggests that private yards are not a feature of this building.

Across all detailed amenity write-ups, golf or putting facilities are never cited. Given how prominently such a feature would be marketed, this is strong evidence that no putting green exists.

At least three listings state 'Amenities include ... picnic area' or similar, indicating a designated outdoor common area for leisure. Even though MLS does not flag RECARE, the consistent 'picnic area' language shows the building provides a recreation area.

Amenity paragraphs highlight pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, storage, and security, but do not mention any rec room or game room. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building lacks a dedicated recreation room.

Agents consistently market the location as 'steps away' from restaurants at Ala Moana Center and Waikiki, not as having its own dining facility. This strongly indicates there is no on-site restaurant amenity.

View descriptions are always tied to individual lanais or unit orientation, not a shared roof deck or rooftop terrace. With no remark or MLS evidence, it is very likely there are no rooftop amenities.

Agents provide detailed amenity overviews yet never refer to any sauna or steam facility. This strongly suggests the building does not offer a sauna.

Strong, repeated evidence that Harbor View Plaza offers storage units/lockers. Across the provided remarks, roughly 10+ listings explicitly mention storage access in forms such as 'extra storage unit in the garage,' 'private storage in the parking garage,' 'storage locker,' and 'onsite storage locker,' which is consistent with the historical MLS amenities and unit features. The mentions come from multiple listings/agents and are not isolated, so this appears to be a real building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.

Surfboard storage is directly and repeatedly referenced in the remarks, including racks and dedicated storage areas. This is strong, explicit evidence that the building offers surfboard storage.

Agents repeatedly describe the building’s amenities but never refer to tennis courts or tennis facilities. The complete absence in both remarks and MLS checkboxes makes it very likely there is no tennis court at this property.

Trash chute is supported by current MLS checkbox data and at least one explicit public remark listing "trash chute" with other amenities. While the public-remarks evidence is thinner than for BBQ and car wash, the MLS frequency is substantial enough to treat it as a building feature. This looks like a legitimate amenity rather than a copy-paste artifact.

Parking is consistently described as assigned, covered, secured, or tandem, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. Given repeated detailed descriptions of parking without mentioning valet, it is very likely the building does not offer valet service.

Several agents describe 'gated assigned parking' and a 'secured entry', showing that access to the parking/entry area is controlled by a physical gate or enclosure. Even without MLS GATED/WALFEN checked, these repeated descriptions across different listings support that the property has a gated/perimeter-type physical barrier.

Amenity lists consistently name only a pool, with no secondary hot-tub-type feature. Given how marketable a whirlpool would be, its absence in remarks and MLS strongly indicates it is not present.

Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool. Across the provided remarks, roughly 10+ listings explicitly mention "pool" or "swimming pool," including phrases like "private pool," "Amenities include swimming pool," and "don't forget the pool to cool off." The high consistency in both current MLS amenities and agent remarks supports this as a true building amenity.

Across all provided remarks, the pool is never described as heated and is only referred to generically as a 'swimming pool' or 'pool to cool off.' MLS data for 20 listings also shows no heated-pool indicators, so there is no support for a heated pool feature at this building.

I searched for salt water pool, saltwater, saline pool, and similar terms, but found none. The remarks confirm a pool exists, yet give no indication that it is salt-based.

Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms in-unit laundry for Harbor View Plaza. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "In-unit washer/dryer," "full size W/D in unit," and a "washer/dryer combo recently installed," indicating this is not just a copy-paste checkbox but a real building feature available in many units.

None of the MLS records for this building mark community laundry as an amenity, and no remarks mention a shared laundry room or coin laundry. Amenities lists instead focus on pool, BBQ, car wash, storage, and bike/surfboard racks, while stressing in-unit washer/dryers, indicating there is likely no community laundry facility.

I searched for coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, and laundry fees, but found no evidence. The public remarks do not indicate that any community laundry requires payment.

I looked for phrases like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry, but found none. The remarks mainly describe in-unit washer/dryer or general laundry references, which do not indicate community laundry on every floor.

Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention a "dedicated parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," "covered parking," "secured/covered garage parking," and "two covered tandem parking," which is consistent with the high-confidence MLS data showing parking features on all current listings.

Assigned parking is well supported by the remarks and MLS checkboxes. Several listings explicitly state "one assigned covered parking stall," "gated assigned parking," and similar language, indicating reserved/unit-specific parking rather than only general parking access.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides covered parking: at least a dozen (≈15+) listings explicitly reference covered or secured parking (quotes include "assigned covered parking stall", "1 covered corner parking stall", "covered, secured parking", "covered tandem parking"). These references are widespread among different listings/agents, indicating the feature is building-wide.

I searched for wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found no explicit match. The remarks only support assigned or covered parking, so deeded parking is not confirmed.

None of the 20 current MLS entries check any EV charging feature, and no agent remarks mention EV chargers, Tesla stations, or similar amenities. Given how consistently other amenities are advertised, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer EV charging stations.

I looked for references to parking fees, monthly charges, or parking rental costs and found nothing. The listings describe parking stalls, but not any separate parking payment.

No listings mark guest parking in MLS, and the only guest-related reference is to public street parking, not on-site guest stalls. The absence of any mention of dedicated guest parking across many remarks makes it very likely the building does not provide its own guest parking area.

Moderately strong evidence: at least 8 listings mention secure or gated access (examples: 'Secure entry', 'secured building', 'secure gated assigned covered parking space', 'covered parking that has secure access to residents'). Multiple agents reference building security and gated/secure parking rather than a single isolated claim, supporting inclusion.

At least one listing specifically advertises “two covered tandem parking on the first floor,” and a couple of MLS entries are coded TANDEM. This shows that some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls, making tandem parking an available building feature.

Across all provided remarks, agents highlight many amenities but never mention valet or attended parking, and no MLS entry checks a valet feature. This consistent omission is strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking service.

I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or joining a parking list and found no references. Nothing in the remarks indicates a formal parking waitlist system.

Listings highlight a 'secured building', 'secured entry', and gated parking but are completely silent about keyed or fob-access elevators. Combined with the absence of any MLS checkbox usage for this feature, it is very likely the elevators are not access-controlled in this way.

I looked for key card access, fob access, card readers, and electronic entry language. The remarks indicate the building is secured, but not that it uses a card/fob security system.

Security guard service appears to be a real building feature. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings reference the building as “secured,” “secure entry,” “secured access,” and even list “security” among amenities; this is consistent with the historical MLS checkbox showing SECGUA in 14/20 listings. The evidence is repeated across multiple agents and reads like an established building amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

I searched for patrol-related wording such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building, but found nothing. The remarks mention security in general, but not patrol service.

Across all supplied remarks, there are no references to cameras, CCTV, or video surveillance, and the MLS security-system checkbox is never used. Given that agents do emphasize other security features, the absence of any mention of video monitoring indicates this feature is very likely not present.

Across all provided remarks there are no mentions of 'central AC' or centralized HVAC; instead, units are described with their own A/C or split AC systems. Current MLS data shows just 1 of 20 listings flagged for central AC, which strongly suggests that was an agent error rather than a true building-wide system. Given the consistent pattern of individual systems, the building is very unlikely to have central air conditioning.

At least 5 of 20 MLS inclusions list ACSPL and multiple current public remarks (≈6 listings) explicitly state 'split AC' or 'brand-new split AC' (e.g., "brand-new split AC", "This unit features a split AC"). Mentions appear across different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting that some units in the building have ductless mini-split systems.

Evidence is moderate rather than explicit: 11 of 20 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and multiple remarks mention AC in some form, including "brand-new split AC" and "whisper quiet AC." The remarks do not clearly say "window AC" or "wall AC," so this looks more like a copy-forward MLS indicator than a strongly described feature.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the current MLS data: all 20 of 20 listings mark the building as CONCRE. Public remarks do not explicitly mention construction, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the unanimous MLS pattern suggests this is a stable building attribute.

Double-wall construction appears in 11 of 20 current MLS listings, which is meaningful but not unanimous. None of the provided public remarks explicitly say 'double wall' or describe two-wall construction, so this looks like a MLS-data feature that is present in some listing records rather than something repeatedly advertised in agent remarks.

No listing identifies hollow tile construction or mentions it in narrative remarks. With universal selection of concrete and no evidence of hollow tile, this construction type is unlikely for the primary structure.

Masonry/stucco is rarely selected in MLS (2 of 20) and never appears in the public remarks, whereas concrete is universally indicated. Given the low and inconsistent signal and lack of descriptive support, we treat masonry/stucco construction as not a defining building feature.

No listings mark steel frame construction and all agree on concrete, with no narrative references to steel framing. For this vintage and location, a reinforced concrete tower without primary steel framing is the most plausible configuration.

Multiple listings (3/20) identify a slab foundation, and none suggest an alternative like post-and-pier. Given the building’s concrete high-rise form and typical local construction practices, a concrete slab foundation is very likely even when not consistently noted by all agents.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings mark wood-frame construction and all identify concrete, matching the profile of a Waikiki concrete condo tower. Given the building type and market norms, it is very unlikely that the structure is wood frame.

The above-ground construction code is rarely used (3/20) and not supported by any narrative description, while the building clearly functions as a standard high-rise concrete tower. The sparse and inconsistent checkbox usage suggests these are likely agent input errors rather than a true building attribute.

There are no MLS checkbox selections or remarks referring to brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the building’s clear identification as a concrete high-rise, brick construction can be safely ruled out.

There is zero MLS or narrative indication of single-wall construction, which would also be structurally incompatible with the described high-rise concrete building type. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not present.

The public remarks directly prohibit short-term rentals, which is strong evidence STRs are not allowed in this building. Because this is explicitly stated, confidence is very high.

I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, hotel-managed units, and similar terms, but found none. Since short-term rentals are explicitly not allowed, a hotel rental pool is not applicable.

I looked for mandatory participation language such as required rental programs, cannot opt out, or hotel pool obligations and found nothing. With STRs prohibited and no rental-pool references, mandatory pool participation is not supported.

Multiple listings are silent on tenure, but one clearly advertises the unit as 'Fee Simple,' and none use leasehold-related language. Thus, the building definitely has fee simple units; among the sampled 20 listings, at least 1 is confirmed FS and 0 are explicitly LH.

None of the listings mention leasehold or lease rent, and no MLS entries are tagged as LH, while at least one listing is clearly Fee Simple. This consistent absence of leasehold indicators across many listings makes it very likely the building has no leasehold units.

I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end, renewal, or extension dates and found none. The explicit "Fee Simple" remark indicates land-tenure lease expiry does not apply.

Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA financing and assumable VA loans, which is direct evidence the building supports VA-related financing marketing. This is strong, repeated mention across listings.

The remarks repeatedly describe a full master insurance policy covering 100% of the building's replacement value, which is consistent with full walls-in coverage. This is strong, direct evidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.

Amenity lists in remarks repeatedly call out features like swimming pool, BBQ, picnic area, car wash, and storage, but never fire sprinklers, and the MLS checkbox for sprinklers is unchecked in all 20 listings. This pattern indicates the building does not have a fire sprinkler system as a notable amenity.

I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE and fire inspection references, and found none. With no current value provided, the safest interpretation is false, but only at medium confidence because absence of mention is not definitive.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are clearly supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly say “ocean view,” “stunning ocean,” “direct ocean view,” and “Pacific Ocean,” and the current MLS data shows OCEAN in 18 of 20 view descriptions with no NONE entries. This looks like consistent building-level marketing rather than a one-off agent error.

At least two separate listings explicitly describe mountain views from the building. MLS data also shows several agents checking the mountain view box. This indicates that some units, likely the mauka-facing stack, enjoy mountain vistas.

Across 20 listings, agents repeatedly detail specific views (ocean, harbor, coastline, city, mountains, sunsets) but never mention Diamond Head. MLS checkbox data also never indicates Diamond Head. Given how prominently Diamond Head is usually marketed when present, it is very likely this building does not offer notable Diamond Head views.

Evidence that the building offers city views: 9 of 20 MLS view_descriptions include CITY and remarks explicitly mention "city views" and urban access (examples: "city views", "gateway to Waikiki", proximity to shopping/Convention Center). Multiple listings from different agents reference city/downtown sightlines, supporting a building-level city view offering.

Listings describe 'coastline views' and 'stunning coastline' alongside ocean and marina vistas, particularly from higher-floor units. These repeated, specific references across multiple units indicate that portions of the building enjoy clear views along the shoreline. MLS data aligns with these remarks, supporting coastline as a true building-level view feature.

One listing mentions 'tree-top views towards the marina', but this is still framed around the marina and not a dedicated garden or courtyard outlook. Given the detailed emphasis on other view types and the absence of any garden/courtyard language in remarks or MLS data, garden views are unlikely to be a notable building feature.

Agents highlight many nearby and visible features—harbor, ocean, coastline, Magic Island, city, and mountains—but never refer to a golf course view. MLS data likewise never flags a golf course view. This strongly indicates the building does not offer meaningful golf course views.

Marina/harbor views are well-supported for this building. Remarks mention “Ala Wai Harbor,” “boat harbor,” “marina,” “harbor views,” and even canal-adjacent views, matching the MLS pattern where 15 of 20 listings include MARCAN and none show NONE. The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real, recurring feature of the building's units.

Public remarks strongly focus on sunset exposure for the harbor/ocean-facing units. However, MLS checkbox data shows a minority of listings marked with SUNRIS, which is plausible for mountain/city-facing units in this location. This provides moderate evidence that some units offer sunrise views, even if they are less commonly marketed.

Sunset views are strongly confirmed. Public remarks repeatedly say “sunset views,” “breathtaking sunsets,” “golden sunsets,” and “nightly sunset views,” and several listings also tie the view to Friday night fireworks and western-facing lanai exposure. With SUNSET appearing in 15 of 20 MLS view descriptions and no NONE entries, this appears to be a genuine building-level offering.

Across all 20 listings, agents focus on harbor, ocean, coastline, parks, city, and mountain views, with no hint of cemetery outlooks. The building's described surroundings (Ala Wai Harbor, Ala Moana Beach Park, Waikiki, Ala Moana Center) also make a cemetery view unlikely. This provides very strong evidence that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

Multiple listings clearly advertise fireworks views from the unit or lanai, not just proximity to fireworks. This is repeated across remarks and is strong direct evidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least 5–6 listings clearly call Harbor View Plaza a pet-friendly building, consistently repeating a rule allowing one small pet (dog or cat) up to about 25 lbs. The repetition of the same rule across different agents and listings provides strong evidence that pets are allowed with size limits.

The feature is strongly supported. Historical MLS data shows 15/20 listings with RESMAN in amenities, and at least one current public remark explicitly states HVP provides a "Resident Manager." The repeated remarks across many agents mostly copy similar amenity language, but the manager reference aligns with the high-confidence MLS pattern.

Listings describe the property as a condo suitable for residence or investment, but never reference hotel programs, nightly rentals, or hotel management. In Waikiki, true condotels are typically marketed explicitly as such, so this omission across all remarks strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

The property is explicitly described as 'Fee Simple' and marketed like a standard condominium, with no reference to cooperative ownership or purchasing shares. Co-ops are rare in this market and are usually clearly labeled, so the consistent absence of such language supports that this is not a co-op building.