Hanohano Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hanohano Hale
Building Overview
Hanohano Hale in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (1973) with pool and assigned parking.
About Hanohano Hale
Hanohano Hale is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1973. The building is of concrete construction and is served by two elevators. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views as noted in the MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, assigned, with guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company information is listed as unknown. This description is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages or descriptive phrases like majority owner occupied, but none were present. Without explicit remark evidence, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
The public remarks directly confirm the building has two elevators. This matches the current building context, and there is no contradictory evidence in the listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common area electricity is moderate, not explicit. 14 of 20 current listings check OTCOEX, while the remarks mostly describe staffing, cleaning, and building upkeep rather than naming electric service. This looks more like MLS checkbox data than repeated agent confirmation, so confidence is medium.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One public remark explicitly says, “Maintenance fees include water, sewer and hot water,” which is direct confirmation that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data also shows 11/20 listings with HOTWAT, reinforcing that this is a building feature. A small number of listings show WTRHTR, but the explicit wording about hot water included is stronger and should be trusted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported. 17 of 20 current listings include SEWER, and the remarks directly confirm it with the phrase "Maintenance fees include water, sewer and hot water." This appears consistent across listings and is not just a one-off checkbox.
Water inclusion is very strongly confirmed. 19 of 20 current listings include WATER, and the remarks explicitly state "Maintenance fees include water, sewer and hot water." The evidence is repeated and consistent, suggesting this is a genuine building-level fee inclusion rather than a copy-paste error.
BBQ/grilling facilities are very well supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area," "barbecue areas," or a "pool & BBQ area," and the references appear across many different remarks rather than a single copied description. Historical MLS data is also strong at 17/20 listings showing BBQ in amenities, so this should be treated as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of listings comprehensively enumerate building amenities without ever referencing a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area, even when highlighting smaller features. Given that only 1/20 MLS entries shows CRWSH checked and there is no textual support in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer a car wash facility. This is best treated as a data-correction against an isolated checkbox mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building mention a lanai or balcony-style outdoor space, often described as 'private lanai,' 'expansive private lanai,' or 'massive lanai.' In the current set, well over a dozen remarks reference this feature, which strongly supports that the building offers patio/deck/lanai amenities for buyers. The consistency across many listings suggests a real building-level feature rather than an MLS copy-paste error.
Across a large number of listings, amenities are repeatedly listed as pool, BBQ area, beach/sandy beach access, community laundry, secured entry, and guest parking, with no mention of a designated jogging or walking path. Given the sparse and inconsistent MLS checkbox use (3/20) and complete absence from narrative remarks, this appears to be agent checkbox error rather than a real building jogging/walking path amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings consistently describe a common outdoor space combining the pool, BBQ area, picnic area, and outdoor showers, functioning as a recreation/amenity area even if not labeled that way. With several MLS entries checking RECARE plus detailed descriptions of this shared leisure zone, there is moderate but credible evidence the building has a recreation area/deck. Some phrasing is reused, but multiple distinct agents still describe the same amenity setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit surfboard or beach-gear storage language such as surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage. The remarks mention surfing and beach gear, but no dedicated storage facility is identified.
No analysis available
Limited evidence for a trash chute: only about 2 of 20 current MLS listings list a trash-chute/TRA CHU amenity flag, and none of the aggregated public remarks explicitly say "trash chute" or "garbage chute." Given prior high-confidence records and a few MLS checkboxes still indicating it, the feature is included but with moderate confidence; the public remarks mainly mention "twice weekly trash pick up" rather than a chute, suggesting inconsistent agent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed by the remarks and historical MLS data. Roughly 20 listings mention it directly, with repeated phrases such as "pool and BBQ area," "private pool," "swimming pool," and "large oceanfront pool." The evidence appears consistent across many listings and agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater, salt pool, saline pool, and similar wording. The only explicit pool-water description found was freshwater, so this is not a saltwater pool.
No analysis available
There is overwhelming evidence that Hanohano Hale has shared/community laundry facilities. Across many current listings, multiple agents independently mention it with specific wording such as 'community laundry,' 'coin operated laundry,' 'community washer and dryer facilities,' and 'two community laundry rooms,' which strongly supports the MLS amenity checkbox rather than a copy-paste error.
I searched for coin-op, quarters, card-operated, and similar paid-laundry wording. The remarks directly confirm coin-operated laundry, so this feature is present.
I looked for explicit language like "laundry on every floor," "each floor," or floor-by-floor laundry access. The public remarks only identify laundry on specific floors or as shared building facilities, which does not support this feature.
Parking is strongly confirmed at the building level. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention it, such as "one dedicated parking stall," "one reserved parking stall," "on-site parking spot," and "one assigned parking stall." The repeated references across multiple listings and agents make this a clear building feature.
Assigned parking is clearly present in the building. Multiple listings mention "one assigned parking stall," "one reserved parking stall," "one dedicated parking stall," and a specific stall number like "stall #45." This is consistent across remarks and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for wording like "deeded parking," "owned parking," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks only mention assigned, reserved, dedicated, or one parking stall, which do not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rental, monthly parking charge, or any additional parking cost and found nothing. The listings mention assigned/reserved/dedicated stalls and guest parking, but no separate parking fee.
Guest parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least several listings state "guest parking" or "plenty of guest parking," and one remark gives directions to "Park in Guest marked parking spots only." The evidence is strong enough to confirm this as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or waiting for a stall and found none. Instead, the remarks repeatedly describe units as having assigned, reserved, or dedicated parking.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic access terms. The listings repeatedly confirm FOB-secured entry, so card/fob access security is present.
Across the provided listings, 0 listings explicitly mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel in guard form. Multiple remarks instead describe secured building access, FOB entry, security cameras, resident manager, site manager, and maintenance staff, which supports general security but not guard service. The MLS checkbox seems inconsistently applied and is not backed by explicit remark evidence.
I looked for references to patrol service, roving security, or a patrolled building. The remarks mention secured entry, cameras, and on-site management, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the current MLS pattern, with 19 of 20 listings showing CONCRE. The public remarks across many agents are consistent with the same building and do not provide evidence against concrete construction.
Double-wall construction is rarely indicated for this building, with just 3 of 20 listings checking the MLS box and no remarks referencing double-wall or similar terms. The structure appears to be a concrete mid/high-rise oceanfront condo, making double-wall framing unlikely. Given the strong majority of listings omitting it and the building type, double-wall construction is treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in a majority of current MLS entries, with 13 of 20 listings showing ABOGRO. The remarks do not explicitly discuss construction method, so this is supported mainly by the MLS pattern rather than direct agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the listings for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or other vacation-rental language and found no explicit permission. Because the remarks do not document STR approval, I am treating it as not evidenced/likely not allowed from the public remarks.
I looked for hotel-pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or any managed hotel rental program and found none. Since the remarks do not describe a hotel rental pool, this feature is false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel rental pool or mandatory participation and found nothing. The remarks also do not mention any optional rental program, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The clearest lease-expiry language in the remarks points to 2023. Multiple listings reference the sandwich lease ending in December 2023, which is the most specific expiry date mentioned.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. The listings discuss fees, parking, and leasehold/fee-simple status, but do not state VA eligibility.
I looked for insurance wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but the remarks do not address it. Since there is no public remark evidence, this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. Because this feature is only determined from public remarks, it remains unknown.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly supported for this building. Across the listing remarks, many units explicitly mention "oceanfront," "direct ocean views," "ocean and mountain views," "Pacific Ocean," and "makai side (oceanside)," confirming that ocean-view units are a consistent building feature rather than a one-off amenity. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and appears to reflect genuine building-level offering, not copy-paste error.
Mountain views are clearly supported by multiple listings. Remarks mention "stunning mountain and ocean views," "Ko'olau Mountain Range," and "direct views to both the... Mountain range," indicating this is a recurring building feature rather than an isolated unit-only anomaly. The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are supported by multiple remarks, though less uniformly than ocean views. Listings describe "breathtaking coastline drives," "stunning coastal scenery," and "coastal beachfront living," which aligns with the MLS coastline view data. The evidence is consistent enough to include the feature for buyers searching for coastline views.
Garden views are the weakest of the five features, but there is some support from the current remarks, including a ground-floor unit overlooking a 'green landscaped area.' With only a few MLS listings showing GARDEN, this appears to be a real but limited building-level view option rather than a universally advertised feature.
No analysis available
All listings consistently describe a sandy beach, open ocean, and mountain backdrop, but never mention a marina, harbor, or canal. Given the building’s rural beachfront location and the complete absence of marina‑related terms in many independent remarks and MLS data, marina views are not a building feature.
Sunrise exposure is directly supported by multiple listings, with phrases such as 'morning coffee at sunrise,' 'stunning sunrises,' and 'private sunrise.' The evidence is consistent and appears across multiple remarks rather than a single agent’s copy.
Multiple independent listings highlight sunset-oriented views from the building, using phrases like 'enjoy every sunset from the comfort of your own private sanctuary,' 'soaking in sunset skies,' and 'breathtaking sunset views.' Other remarks mention relaxing or unwinding 'at sunset' on the lanai. This consistent marketing emphasis indicates buyers can find units here with sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or seeing fireworks from the unit. Nothing in the public remarks indicates the building has fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports a resident manager on-site at this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it across different agents and time periods, including phrases such as "resident manager on site," "on-site manager," and "site manager." This does not look like a one-off copy-paste error because the same amenity appears consistently in both MLS amenities and public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.