Hanohano Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hanohano Hale
Building Overview
Hanohano Hale in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (1973) with pool and assigned parking.
About Hanohano Hale
Hanohano Hale is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1973. The building is of concrete construction and is served by two elevators. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views as noted in the MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, assigned, with guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company information is listed as unknown. This description is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar wording, but the remarks do not provide any ownership-occupancy information. Since no percentage is stated anywhere in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks directly confirm the building has two elevators, which matches the current value. I found an explicit mention in the listing amenities section, so this is high-confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate but not explicit. Fourteen of 20 current listings include OTCOEX, while the remarks mostly describe general building upkeep such as 'common area cleaning personnel' and maintenance staff rather than clearly stating common-area electricity. This looks somewhat like repeated MLS copy/paste behavior, so the feature is supported but not strongly confirmed by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One public remark explicitly says, “Maintenance fees include water, sewer and hot water,” which is direct confirmation that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data also shows 11/20 listings with HOTWAT, reinforcing that this is a building feature. A small number of listings show WTRHTR, but the explicit wording about hot water included is stronger and should be trusted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported. Seventeen of 20 current listings include SEWER, and at least one remark explicitly states 'Maintenance fees include water, sewer and hot water.' The combination of high current MLS frequency and direct wording makes this feature highly reliable.
Water inclusion is very strongly confirmed. Nineteen of 20 current listings include WATER, and the remarks directly state 'Maintenance fees include water, sewer and hot water.' This is a high-confidence building feature with both MLS and narrative evidence pointing the same way.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area," "barbecue area," or "pool & BBQ area," appearing consistently across different remarks and agents. The pattern looks like a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste error, and it is reinforced by the high historical MLS confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of listings comprehensively enumerate building amenities without ever referencing a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area, even when highlighting smaller features. Given that only 1/20 MLS entries shows CRWSH checked and there is no textual support in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer a car wash facility. This is best treated as a data-correction against an isolated checkbox mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building mention a lanai or balcony-style outdoor space, often described as 'private lanai,' 'expansive private lanai,' or 'massive lanai.' In the current set, well over a dozen remarks reference this feature, which strongly supports that the building offers patio/deck/lanai amenities for buyers. The consistency across many listings suggests a real building-level feature rather than an MLS copy-paste error.
Across a large number of listings, amenities are repeatedly listed as pool, BBQ area, beach/sandy beach access, community laundry, secured entry, and guest parking, with no mention of a designated jogging or walking path. Given the sparse and inconsistent MLS checkbox use (3/20) and complete absence from narrative remarks, this appears to be agent checkbox error rather than a real building jogging/walking path amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings consistently describe a common outdoor space combining the pool, BBQ area, picnic area, and outdoor showers, functioning as a recreation/amenity area even if not labeled that way. With several MLS entries checking RECARE plus detailed descriptions of this shared leisure zone, there is moderate but credible evidence the building has a recreation area/deck. Some phrasing is reused, but multiple distinct agents still describe the same amenity setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit amenity language like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike and surfboard storage. The remarks discuss surfing and beach gear, but I found no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Limited evidence for a trash chute: only about 2 of 20 current MLS listings list a trash-chute/TRA CHU amenity flag, and none of the aggregated public remarks explicitly say "trash chute" or "garbage chute." Given prior high-confidence records and a few MLS checkboxes still indicating it, the feature is included but with moderate confidence; the public remarks mainly mention "twice weekly trash pick up" rather than a chute, suggesting inconsistent agent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is very strongly supported: roughly 20 listings mention it directly, with phrases like “pool and BBQ area,” “private pool,” “swimming pool,” and “oceanfront pool.” The remarks are consistent across multiple agents and listing types, so this does not look like a copy-paste anomaly but a real shared building amenity.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool language. The only explicit pool-water description found was “freshwater swimming pool,” so the pool is not salt water.
No analysis available
There is overwhelming evidence that the building has shared/community laundry facilities. Across many current listings, multiple agents explicitly mention it with consistent wording such as "community laundry," "coin operated laundry," "community washer and dryer facilities," and "two community laundry rooms." This looks like a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error, and it is confirmed in remarks across numerous listings.
I searched for coin-op, coin operated, quarters, card-operated, and other paid-laundry terms. Multiple remarks explicitly state the laundry is coin operated, which confirms paid community laundry.
I looked for language indicating laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry on every floor. The public remarks instead describe laundry on specific floors only, such as “located on the same floor as the unit” and “community laundry room is located on the 4th floor.” This supports false.
Parking is strongly confirmed at the building level. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention parking, including "one dedicated parking stall," "one reserved parking stall," "one assigned parking stall," and "guest parking," showing this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off unit detail. The evidence appears repeated across multiple agents and listings.
Assigned parking is clearly a building feature. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall," "reserved parking stall," or "one dedicated parking stall," and the current MLS checkbox data is overwhelmingly consistent with ASSIGN. This is strong cross-listing evidence rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating deeded or owned parking, such as "deeded parking" or "parking included in the deed," and found none. The listings consistently say assigned, reserved, or dedicated stall, which does not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly parking rentals, or additional parking charges and found nothing. The remarks mention assigned/dedicated stalls and guest parking, but no separate parking cost.
Guest parking is present: 12 of 20 listings include GUEST in parking_features and remarks include phrases like 'Guest Parking', 'plenty of guest parking', and specific directions for guest stalls. Multiple agent remarks corroborate availability of guest/visitor parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist system, including "join waitlist" or "parking waiting list," and found none. The listings instead describe assigned, dedicated, or reserved stalls and guest parking.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access terms. The remarks repeatedly reference FOB-secured entry/building access, which is strong evidence of a card/fob security system.
Across the provided listings, 0 listings explicitly mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel in guard form. Multiple remarks instead describe secured building access, FOB entry, security cameras, resident manager, site manager, and maintenance staff, which supports general security but not guard service. The MLS checkbox seems inconsistently applied and is not backed by explicit remark evidence.
I looked for terms such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building. The remarks mention security cameras, secured entry, and an on-site manager, but nothing indicating an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the current MLS pattern: 19 of 20 listings show CONCRE. The public remarks across many agents are consistent with the same building and do not indicate any change away from concrete, so this appears to be a stable building-level fact rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Double-wall construction is rarely indicated for this building, with just 3 of 20 listings checking the MLS box and no remarks referencing double-wall or similar terms. The structure appears to be a concrete mid/high-rise oceanfront condo, making double-wall framing unlikely. Given the strong majority of listings omitting it and the building type, double-wall construction is treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in a majority of current MLS entries, with 13 of 20 listings showing ABOGRO. The remarks do not explicitly discuss this feature, but the recurring building-level MLS pattern across multiple listings suggests it is likely correct and not just a one-off agent checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct evidence of short-term rental allowance such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU and found none. The remarks do mention investment property and vacation-style use, but that is not enough to confirm STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel-pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or hotel-managed rental programs and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for words like mandatory, must rent, cannot opt out, or required rental participation and found none. The remarks frame the units as primary homes, second homes, or personal getaways, which is inconsistent with a mandatory pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The lease expiry year is explicitly mentioned in multiple remarks as 2023. I used the most specific and recent end-date language available, which points to December 2023.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings discuss fee simple/leasehold status, parking, pool, and amenities, but do not reference VA eligibility.
I looked for HOA insurance wording indicating the building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage, but there were no such references. Because the remarks are silent on insurance status, this is treated as false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. With no current verified value provided and no supporting mention, the safest interpretation is false.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly supported across the listing set. Many remarks explicitly say "direct ocean views," "oceanfront," "wake up to the sound of the ocean," and "view of the ocean," appearing across many different listings rather than a single copied remark. This is strong building-level evidence that the building offers ocean-view units.
Mountain views are clearly supported by multiple listings. Remarks mention "stunning mountain and ocean views," "Ko'olau Mountain Range," and "direct views to both the... Mountain range," indicating this is a recurring building feature rather than an isolated unit-only anomaly. The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are supported by multiple remarks, though less uniformly than ocean views. Listings describe "breathtaking coastline drives," "stunning coastal scenery," and "coastal beachfront living," which aligns with the MLS coastline view data. The evidence is consistent enough to include the feature for buyers searching for coastline views.
Garden views are the weakest of the five features, but there is some support from the current remarks, including a ground-floor unit overlooking a 'green landscaped area.' With only a few MLS listings showing GARDEN, this appears to be a real but limited building-level view option rather than a universally advertised feature.
No analysis available
All listings consistently describe a sandy beach, open ocean, and mountain backdrop, but never mention a marina, harbor, or canal. Given the building’s rural beachfront location and the complete absence of marina‑related terms in many independent remarks and MLS data, marina views are not a building feature.
Sunrise exposure is directly supported by multiple listings, with phrases such as 'morning coffee at sunrise,' 'stunning sunrises,' and 'private sunrise.' The evidence is consistent and appears across multiple remarks rather than a single agent’s copy.
Multiple independent listings highlight sunset-oriented views from the building, using phrases like 'enjoy every sunset from the comfort of your own private sanctuary,' 'soaking in sunset skies,' and 'breathtaking sunset views.' Other remarks mention relaxing or unwinding 'at sunset' on the lanai. This consistent marketing emphasis indicates buyers can find units here with sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit phrases like fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see fireworks from the unit. The remarks talk about ocean, mountain, beach, sunrise, and whale views, but nothing about fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports a resident manager on-site at this building. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'resident manager on site,' 'on sight management,' and 'maintenance fees include a site manager.' The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.