Hanalei Colony Resort
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hanalei Colony Resort
Building Overview
Hanalei Colony Resort (neighborhood unknown) — ocean views, pool and BBQ area; short-term rentals allowed.
About Hanalei Colony Resort
Hanalei Colony Resort is a condominium complex listed as built in 1981. The neighborhood and unit sizes/construction type are not provided in the available MLS data, so those details should be confirmed by buyers or their agents.
According to available records, the property offers ocean views and on-site amenities that include a pool and a BBQ area. Short-term rentals are allowed at this property, and pets are not permitted.
Parking is noted as available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS information; prospective buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, 1/2 MLS entries mark common area electricity included (OTCOEX), but no remarks mention building or common-area power being part of the maintenance fee. Given the lack of textual confirmation and inconsistent agent input, this feature is likely not a true building-wide inclusion and is treated as absent.
No analysis available
Half of the current listings check electricity included (ELECTR), but the public remarks never state that electricity or power is covered by HOA fees. Because agents usually advertise included utilities and here they do not, the MLS checkbox is likely inaccurate and electricity-in-fee is treated as not present.
No analysis available
The MLS data are conflicting: 1/2 listings claim HOTWAT in the fee, but another 1/2 list an individual water heater (WTRHTR), which typically means hot water is not a shared building utility. With no remarks describing hot water as an included utility, building-supplied hot water in the fees is very unlikely and is marked as not included.
Although 1/2 listings mark internet service (INTSER) as included, neither set of remarks says that internet or Wi-Fi is covered by the HOA. Given that such a perk is typically highlighted, the checked box is likely an error and internet-in-fee is treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only half of the current listings indicate water included (WATER), and no marketing remarks mention water being covered by HOA fees. Because the MLS inputs are inconsistent and unsupported by text, water-in-fee is not considered a confirmed building feature and is set to not included.
1 of 2 listings checks BBQ in amenities, yet no remarks mention grills or BBQ areas. Evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data and could be agent copy‑paste, so the building likely has shared BBQs but this is not firmly documented in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both available listings mention lanai spaces, including a "covered lanai" and a unit with a "separate entrance and lanai" plus a "back lanai" opening to green space. Even though only one MLS checkbox marks PATDEC/COVPAT, the consistent lanai descriptions across both listings indicate the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor areas for its units.
2 of 2 listings list a walking/jogging path in their amenities, with no remarks contradicting it. Although not described in prose, the consistent MLS data suggests the building or its grounds provide an accessible walking/jogging path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 listings flags a recreation area in amenities, and another explicitly describes a large designated green space used for activities like yoga, Frisbee, and soccer. This strongly suggests a shared recreation area or amenity lawn for residents/guests.
No analysis available
1 of 2 listings explicitly mentions an 'on-site ... restaurant' and also checks the restaurant amenity in the MLS. Even though the second listing does not mention it, the direct description confirms the building offers an on-site restaurant accessible to residents/guests.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for specific surfboard storage terms and none were found. This indicates that dedicated surfboard storage is probably not an advertised amenity at this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 listings notes an on-site 'spa' alongside a pool and restaurant, and the MLS amenities for that listing include WHIRLP. Together this strongly indicates the property offers a shared whirlpool/hot tub as part of its resort-style amenities.
Both available listings explicitly mention a pool: one notes an "on-site pool" as part of the resort amenities, and the other describes access to the "largest pool in Princeville" just off the lanai. With 2/2 current listings and detailed narrative confirmation, evidence is strong that the building offers a shared swimming pool for residents/guests. No historical data contradicts this, so the pool feature is validated with high confidence.
No analysis available
The pool is noted only as 'on-site' and 'largest pool in Princeville' with no indication of water type. Without explicit mention of saltwater, the pool is assumed not to be saltwater for now.
No analysis available
Out of 2 recent listings, 1 has the MLS community-laundry checkbox (COMLAU), while the remarks for both listings do not mention laundry facilities at all. This provides weak, checkbox-only evidence that the building offers shared laundry, with no supporting narrative confirmation. Because MLS checkboxes can be copied or unchecked inconsistently, this amenity is included but with low confidence.
The text was searched for indicators of paid laundry such as 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', or 'laundry fee' without any results. In the absence of such clues, paid community laundry is assumed not to be a feature, though this is not certain.
The remarks were checked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' and none were present. This suggests the building likely does not offer community laundry on every floor, but it is not definitively ruled out.
All 2 of 2 current MLS listings for this building have a parking type specified in parking_features and none list parking as 'NONE', which strongly indicates that parking is available at the property. While the public remarks for these units do not explicitly mention parking, they also do not contradict the MLS checkbox data. Given the consistency across all current listings, parking is treated as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', 'parking included in deed', and found no references. In the absence of any mention, deeded parking is assumed not to be a defined feature in the remarks.
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', 'additional parking cost', or similar phrases and found none. The presence or amount of any parking fee cannot be determined from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar language and found nothing. There is no evidence in the remarks that a parking waitlist system exists.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for card/fob access terminology but none appeared. This suggests the building may not use card-based security access, though it cannot be conclusively ruled out from these remarks alone.
No analysis available
Descriptions of building services and amenities do not include any form of security patrol. Given this absence, a security patrol is considered unlikely but not definitively excluded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 out of 2 current listings mark double wall (DOUWAL) in construction materials, and no remarks contradict this. The consistency across all available listings suggests the building is double-wall construction with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 2 current listings for this building, only 1 lists wood frame (WOOFRA) in construction materials and 0 remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction. Given the mixed MLS data and lack of remark support, the evidence is insufficient to confidently say the building is wood frame, so it is treated as not verified/false for now.
Out of 2 current listings, just 1 lists above-ground construction (ABOGRO) and none of the remarks reference above-ground building methods. Because the evidence is weak and inconsistent, this feature is not considered verified and is set to false for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly market the properties for hotel pool participation and Airbnb-style income generation. This strongly indicates that short-term rentals are allowed in this building/complex context.
There is clear reference to participation in a hotel pool program associated with the resort. This confirms the existence of a hotel rental pool option for units in this context.
The remarks only state that the unit is part of the hotel pool program, without specifying that all owners must participate. In the absence of explicit mandatory language, hotel pool participation is assumed not to be mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for statements such as 'lease expires 20XX', 'land lease to 20XX', or 'ground lease ends' and found nothing. Without a specific year, the lease expiry is unknown.
Searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found none. There is no evidence in the public remarks that this building is VA loan approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
1/2 listings clearly and repeatedly describe ocean views (e.g., 'Upgraded Ocean-View Unit', 'awe-inspiring ocean views from multiple areas of the unit'). This is strong, explicit evidence that the building offers ocean-view units despite the MLS view_descriptions not including OCEAN.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0/2 listings mention coastline, shoreline, or coastal views, and MLS view data also lacks any COASTL-related descriptors. Given that ocean views are explicitly highlighted while no coastline view language appears, current evidence supports treating coastline views as not a documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were reviewed for any reference to watching fireworks from the property or its lanais and none were found. This makes it likely that a fireworks view is not a marketed feature here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 2 recent listings, only 1 shows the RESMAN amenity checked while the other does not, and neither remark set mentions a resident or on-site manager. The Hanalei Colony Resort listing highlights multiple resort amenities ("on-site pool, spa, restaurant, and coffee shop") but omits any reference to on-site or resident management. Because the amenity checkbox is inconsistent and there are no textual confirmations, this appears to be a copied or mistaken MLS checkbox rather than a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.