Haloa at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Haloa at Hoopili
Building Overview
Haloa at Hoopili in Ewa — wood-frame building (2017) with on-site pool and split air conditioning.
About Haloa at Hoopili
Haloa at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2017 and is constructed with a wood frame. Size and unit count are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool. Units feature split air conditioning. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the available records.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with additional guest parking. Management company information is unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS-derived information; buyers should confirm current details, fees, rules, and availability with listing agents or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' No owner-occupancy information appears in the remarks, so the percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' None of the listings mention elevators, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence suggests common-area electricity is included. The current MLS pattern is 13/15 listings with OTCOEX, and nothing in the remarks indicates this was removed or changed. This looks like a stable association fee inclusion rather than a copy-paste outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that hot water is not included. The MLS pattern is clear: 0/15 HOTWAT and 13/15 WTRHTR, and the remarks contain no contrary statement about hot water being part of the maintenance fee. This is consistent across the building and not just a single-agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks point away from sewer being included in the maintenance fee. Several listings say water/sewer are separately metered or that the other fee is a submetering fee, which is inconsistent with sewer inclusion. The MLS checkbox frequency is low at 5/15, supporting a false value.
The remarks repeatedly indicate water is billed separately rather than included in HOA dues. Examples include 'Water & Sewer separately metered for each unit' and 'Other fee is a submetering fee for water.' With only 5/15 MLS listings checking WATER, the evidence favors false.
BBQ is mentioned directly in the public remarks (e.g., 'community pool, BBQ area, & recreation room') and the MLS checkbox is set in roughly half the listings (7/14). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with current MLS data, indicating shared BBQ/grilling facilities in the community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The feature is strongly supported across many listings: several remarks explicitly mention the "SoHo Community Center," "community center," "rec center," "recreation room," and "party rooms." This aligns with the historical high-confidence data and appears consistently in multiple agent remarks, not just a single copy-paste reference.
No analysis available
Dog park is repeatedly mentioned across many listings ('gated dog park', 'dog park', 'pet relief area') and prior data showed high confidence. The consistency across agent remarks and MLS checkboxes provides very strong evidence that a shared dog park/pet area exists in the community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks include direct references to meeting/conference-type spaces (e.g., 'party rooms', 'meeting room'), and multiple MLS entries check the meeting-room amenity. The explicit phrasing across listings yields high confidence that meeting/party rooms are part of the community amenities.
There are several listings that directly reference patio/deck-type outdoor areas, with phrases like 'outdoor deck,' 'spacious lanai,' and 'a patio.' Current MLS data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT in 7 of 15 listings, so this appears to be a real amenity available in some units rather than an isolated agent error.
There is solid building/community-level evidence for jogging/walking paths: multiple remarks describe "wide pathways," "pedestrian pathways," and Ho‘opili's walkable street layout. The current data still reflects the same amenity pattern seen historically, so this looks like a real community feature rather than a checkbox error.
No analysis available
Private yard space is mentioned repeatedly across many listings, often with very specific language such as 'private front & back yards,' 'fenced courtyard,' 'enclosed yard,' and 'fenced yards.' The pattern is consistent across multiple agents and is reinforced by current MLS data showing PRIYAR in 11 of 15 listings, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
The remarks frequently reference parks, community pool and recreation centers (e.g., 'Walking distance to parks and Community Pool and Rec.', 'Ho'Opili Community has a lot to offer such as a community center, community pool, parks...'), supporting that shared recreation areas/amenity decks exist. Mentions are somewhat generalized, so confidence is moderate-high.
Several listings mention community recreation facilities explicitly (phrases like 'Community Pool and Rec.' and 'recreation room for endless entertainment'). Although fewer MLS checkboxes are checked (2/14), the direct textual mentions in multiple remarks provide strong evidence the building/community offers a recreation room.
Although a few MLS listings have the RESTAU checkbox (3/14), the combined public remarks mention nearby restaurants and coffee shops but never an on-site or in-building restaurant/café. The absence of explicit on-site dining descriptions across agent remarks suggests the RESTAU checkbox is likely an MLS checkbox error or reflects nearby retail rather than a building amenity; evidence is insufficient to assert an on-site restaurant.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is weakly supported by the MLS data, with 4 of 15 listings flagging some form of storage/additional storage, but no remarks describe it directly. Because the remarks across multiple listings focus on parking, yards, and split A/C rather than storage, this looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than strong building-wide confirmation.
Public remarks for multiple listings in this building were reviewed for any indication of surfboard storage (terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or 'surf storage'). None of the descriptions reference any dedicated surfboard storage amenity. In the absence of explicit mentions, it is assumed the building likely does not offer surfboard storage, but this is not certain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings: roughly 10+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention a community pool or pool amenities. The references are consistent across multiple agents and often appear alongside related recreational features like rec centers, BBQ areas, and party rooms, indicating this is a real shared building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference multiple community and recreation pools but never describe them as saltwater or saline. I specifically searched for terms indicating a saltwater system and found none. In the absence of explicit evidence, the pool is assumed not to be saltwater.
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. The current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions on 15/15 listings, and several remarks independently confirm it with phrases like 'full-sized laundry on 2nd floor' and 'washer and dryer' as an upgrade. This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Listings describe private in-unit laundry and never indicate any paid or coin/card-operated communal laundry facilities. Searched for indications of paid laundry such as 'coin', 'card', 'laundry fee', and 'coin-op' but found no evidence that community laundry requires payment.
Remarks consistently emphasize in-unit laundry locations and convenience, and never reference shared laundry facilities on any floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry', and 'laundry room on every floor' but found none, so community laundry on every floor is unlikely.
Parking is strongly supported across the building. All current MLS records include a parking feature, and the remarks consistently reference garages, stalls, driveway parking, and parking pads. This appears to be a stable building-level feature confirmed by many listings rather than a one-off agent entry.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported. At least 11 of 15 MLS records indicate assigned parking, and multiple remarks independently describe assigned, dedicated, or designated stalls/spaces. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. Nearly all current MLS records show covered/garage parking, and the public remarks repeatedly mention garages and garage parking. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, making this a high-confidence feature.
Multiple listings mention garages and assigned or dedicated parking. None explicitly says the parking is deeded, included in the deed, or owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking-related fees and monthly charges. No parking fee information was found, so the amount is unknown.
Guest parking appears to be available at the building level. Six MLS records include guest parking, and several remarks clearly reference guest/visitor stalls or guest parking nearby. While not universal in every listing, the repeated mentions across different remarks support including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss assigned stalls, garages, guest parking, and street parking but contain no indication of a parking waitlist. Based on the available remarks, no waitlist is evidenced.
No analysis available
The public remarks describe layouts, parking, community pools, parks, dog parks (including a gated dog park), and other amenities, but do not reference any type of key card, fob, or electronic access control for the building or units. I specifically searched for terms like key card, keycard, fob, card reader, controlled access, and electronic entry and found none. In the absence of any mention, card/fob access is assumed not to be present.
No listing remarks (0/14) mention security guards or 24/7 security. MLS checkbox appears on only 1 of 14 listings, indicating low/absent historical support and likely copy/paste error by an agent. Because one listing still shows the amenity checked, there is some remaining uncertainty and the confidence is moderate rather than high.
The remarks focus on home features, parking, community centers, parks, pools, and neighborhood conveniences, but provide no indication of any on-site or roving security patrol service. I looked for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled community/building and did not find them. With no explicit evidence of patrol services, this feature is treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for split AC: roughly 10+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention split A/C or split system units, including phrases like 'split A/C units,' 'split ACs in each bedroom,' and 'BRAND NEW ... Split System.' The consistency across multiple listings and agents suggests this is a real, established feature rather than copy-paste error. Historical MLS data also supports it, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a consistent building-level trait across the majority of listings. 13 of 15 current MLS entries mark DOUWAL, which strongly suggests this is not a one-off agent checkbox error. No remarks explicitly mention it, but the MLS pattern is strong and persistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS construction data indicates wood frame construction on 5 of 13 listings in this Haloa at Ho'opili building. Since these are townhomes in the same DR Horton development and no listings describe a different structural system, it is reasonably likely the building is wood frame, though the evidence is moderate rather than overwhelming.
Above-ground construction is only weakly supported at this time. Four of 15 current listings check ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground or mention related construction details. This looks like tentative MLS-only evidence rather than a confirmed building-wide characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term-rental indicators and prohibitive terms such as a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant restriction. No qualifying STR language was found, so STR permission is not evidenced.
The remarks describe community pools and recreation amenities only, not a hotel rental pool. Because STR permission is not evidenced, this feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
I searched for language requiring participation in a hotel rental program or preventing owners from opting out. No such language was found, and the prerequisites for a mandatory rental pool are absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold terminology and specific expiration or extension years. No applicable land-lease information was found, so the expiry year is unknown.
The public remarks directly reference an assumable VA loan available to qualified veterans. This is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted for the property/building.
I searched for HOA insurance language such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'comprehensive building insurance,' and 'walls-in coverage.' None of the public remarks address building insurance coverage, so this remains false with low-to-medium confidence.
No listings' public remarks (0/14) mention fire sprinklers, 'sprinkler', 'sprinkler system' or 'fire suppression'. Only 1 of 14 MLS listings has the FIRSPR amenity checked, indicating that the checkbox is likely an agent error or was undone in most listings. Given the lack of any explicit remarks describing installed sprinklers and the low/absent historical signal, we conclude the building does not offer a fire sprinkler system.
I searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' 'life safety compliant,' and 'passed fire inspection.' No such statements or explicit denials appear in the remarks, so this remains false with low-to-medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one current MLS listing (1 of 14) explicitly tags the view as 'CITY'. None of the public remarks emphasize 'city', 'downtown', or 'cityscape' (remarks instead mention 'mountain views'), so evidence for city views is limited to the MLS flag on a single listing and appears to be isolated across agents.
No analysis available
Garden-style views are supported by the MLS and by several remarks across listings. At least 4 listings explicitly show GARDEN in the view field, and remarks mention phrases like "landscaped fenced courtyard in front and in the back," "beautifully landscaped private front and back yards," and "landscaped pet relief area." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks were reviewed for phrases like "fireworks view", "watch fireworks from lanai", or similar, but none were found. In the absence of any mention of fireworks views, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.