Hale O Naia

The MLS property data is fully consistent, with 7 out of 7 listings reporting the building as built in 1966. No listing remarks contradict this, so 1966 is accepted as the construction year with high confidence.

Across 7 listings for this building, the highest reported unit floor is 8, and no remarks mention a taller or top-floor unit. In the absence of explicit building-height comments, the building is treated as having at least 8 floors based on the highest observed unit floor.

No listing remarks mention the total number of units (e.g., 'XX-unit building'), and the available MLS data does not provide a reliable unit count. As a result, the building’s total unit count cannot be determined from the current information.

Searched remarks for numeric or descriptive owner-occupancy statements. None were present; per rules do not guess a percentage without explicit data, so owner-occupancy is unknown.

Remarks confirm at least one elevator exists ('Key Elevator for Security') but do not provide a numeric count. Per rules, do not guess a number without an explicit statement, so the numeric value is unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks describe a window AC unit and cooling via cross-breeze, with no mention of central air. With 0 of 7 MLS records indicating central AC in the fee, it is very unlikely that central AC is a building amenity or fee-included service.

Most MLS entries do not list cable TV as part of the maintenance fee (1/7 checked). Remarks focus on location and low fees without noting cable included, suggesting this is not a standard included utility. The single positive entry is likely an agent checkbox error rather than a building-wide feature.

Five of eight current MLS listings (5/8) include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, giving a moderate indication that common area electricity is covered. Remarks do not explicitly state 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', so evidence is implied across multiple agent listings and may reflect copy/paste; confidence is moderate (0.75).

All available MLS data omit cooperative taxes from the fee, and the building is presented as a condo rather than a co-op. This makes it effectively certain that coop taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

No MLS records show electricity included in the maintenance fee. Given the emphasis on low fees and absence of any mention of power being included, building-wide electric inclusion is very unlikely.

Gas appears in association_fee_includes on a minority of listings (2/7) with no supporting remarks. This pattern and the focus on low maintenance fees indicate gas is probably not included in the HOA dues.

Remarks explicitly list 'Two Water Heaters' and MLS data shows multiple listings include WTRHTR (3/8) while only one lists HOTWAT. This strongly indicates hot water is not a building‑supplied/HOA‑included utility; confidence is high (0.90).

Internet service is never listed as part of the association fee in the MLS data. The absence of any remark about included internet strongly suggests it is not covered by the maintenance fees.

There is no indication in MLS data or remarks that the building has marina facilities or that marina costs are included in fees. Given the inland canal-side location and silence on boating amenities, marina inclusion can be ruled out.

Seven of eight current MLS entries (7/8) include SEWER in association_fee_includes and historical confidence was High, with no remarks disputing it. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings, so sewer being fee-included is very likely (0.92).

Seven of eight MLS records (7/8) indicate water is included in the association fees, matching prior high confidence and with no contradictory public remarks. The evidence is consistent across listings, so water being fee-included is very likely (0.92).

Agent remarks across all 7 listings focus on location and interior upgrades with no mention of BBQ grills or an outdoor cooking area. The MLS amenities section for every listing leaves BBQ unchecked, indicating this feature is not present.

Current listings (0/7) do not show bike storage in amenities, and remarks only mention that the lanai has "plenty of storage for bikes and surboards," indicating use of private outdoor space rather than a shared bike room or racks. With no evidence of a dedicated bicycle storage facility across multiple agents’ descriptions, the building is very likely to lack formal bike storage.

Although the building is near the Ala Wai Canal and Waikiki Beach, no agent claims marina access, boat slips, or a dock. The MLS amenity data also does not list a marina or boat dock, indicating the building lacks this feature.

Parking is mentioned (including rented stalls), but there is no reference to any vehicle wash facility. MLS amenity fields consistently omit a car wash feature, so the building likely does not provide one.

Multiple agents marketing different units never reference a clubhouse or community center, which would be a key selling point if present. MLS amenity checkboxes uniformly exclude a clubhouse for this property.

There is no mention or checkbox indication of concierge service in any listing. Since concierge is usually a key marketing point when available, its complete absence across all current remarks and amenities implies the building does not offer concierge services.

None of the unit descriptions refer to any on-site dog park or designated pet area. Combined with the absence of this amenity in MLS data, this suggests the building does not offer a dedicated dog park.

All available listings omit any doorman amenity, and no public remarks describe a staffed lobby or door attendant. For a feature that is typically highlighted when present, this consistent absence across multiple agents indicates the building does not have a doorman.

None of the 7 unit remarks reference an exercise room, gym, or fitness center. MLS amenities for this building also consistently omit any exercise-related facility, suggesting the building does not offer this shared amenity.

Remarks focus on the unit features and walkable Waikiki location without referencing any chauffeur, limousine, or courtesy car service. This, plus the lack of an MLS checkbox for such service, indicates the building does not offer limo service.

Across all available listings, there is no indication of a shared meeting or conference room. The MLS amenities also do not list any such facility for the building.

Two listings for this building describe a lanai, including a 'large lanai' and lanai used for storage or relaxation, which functions as patio/deck space. Even though agents did not check the patio/deck amenity box, these repeated lanai references confirm that at least some units offer this outdoor feature, so buyers searching for buildings with balconies/patios would be interested.

Agents emphasize location near beaches, parks, and Ala Wai but do not claim any on-site jogging or walking path. MLS amenities for the property do not list a jogging path, suggesting no dedicated building path exists.

The remarks, even when describing location and nearby amenities, make no reference to a children's playground within the building. The MLS amenities consistently omit a playground, indicating this feature is not available on-site.

Across all seven sets of remarks there is no reference to a yard, fenced yard, or private ground-level outdoor space—only above-ground lanais are mentioned. Combined with the absence of the PRIYAR amenity in the MLS, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard areas to units.

Listings note proximity to Ala Wai Golf Course but do not describe any building putting green or golf practice area. The MLS amenity section for each listing also omits a putting green, so this appears to be an off-site, not building, amenity.

Remarks emphasize proximity to beaches, parks, and Ala Wai Golf Course but do not mention an on-site recreation deck or amenity area. Consistent omission from the MLS amenity list further supports that there is no shared recreation area in the building.

Across 7 separate listings, there is no mention of any shared recreation or game room. The absence of this amenity in both remarks and the MLS checkbox data indicates the building does not have a recreation room.

All remarks frame restaurants as nearby neighborhood amenities rather than on-site services. The MLS amenity list does not include any restaurant or café in the building, indicating there is no in-house dining facility.

Agent remarks highlight views from units but do not mention any common rooftop deck or rooftop access. MLS amenity fields for every listing omit rooftop features, indicating the building likely lacks shared rooftop amenities.

Across multiple agents and time frames, no remarks promote a sauna or steam room, which would be notable in marketing. The MLS amenity checkboxes for the building uniformly leave SAUNA unmarked.

No listings (0/7) indicate storage units or lockers in the amenities, and the remarks never reference a dedicated storage room or locker system. Mentions of "plenty of storage" are tied to the unit’s own lanai space, not a building-level storage amenity. Given the consistent absence of this feature across all data, it is very likely the building does not offer dedicated storage units.

The public remarks explicitly indicate available surfboard storage on the lanai in multiple places. This is direct evidence that surfboard storage is available in the unit/building context.

None of the listings describe tennis courts or similar sports facilities, which would normally be highlighted if available. The MLS amenities data also consistently omits tennis courts for this building.

Even though many Honolulu condos have trash chutes, these listings do not reference one, and the amenity is never checked in MLS for this building. In the absence of any direct mention or MLS indication, it is safest to treat a trash chute as not confirmed for this property.

The remarks discuss standard parking (including a rented stall) but never mention valet or assisted parking services. With no MLS valet amenity flagged and no textual references, it is very likely this building does not offer valet service.

MLS amenities do not indicate a gated or walled/fenced property on any listing, and agents do not describe the building as gated or enclosed. The consistent omission suggests the property does not have notable perimeter walls or fencing marketed as a security or privacy feature.

If present, a hot tub or spa would typically be highlighted alongside other amenities, but none of the 7 listings mention it. The MLS amenities section likewise omits whirlpool or spa facilities, suggesting none exist in the building.

Across 7 listings for this building, no agent checked pool-related MLS amenities and no remarks reference a pool, lap pool, or any shared swimming facility. The descriptions focus on location, views, interior upgrades, and parking, with no implied access to a pool. This consistent omission across multiple agents and listings indicates the building likely has no pool.

No listings for this building reference a heated pool in either MLS checkboxes or remarks, and there is no evidence of even a standard pool. Given the complete absence of any mention across 7 listings, it is highly unlikely that a heated pool exists at this property.

There are no references to any pool—saltwater or otherwise—in the public remarks. The building context lists pool=False; therefore 'salt pool' is kept false with low confidence due to absence of any pool-related mentions.

Two of seven MLS listings for this building check washer/dryer in the inclusions, indicating those particular units likely have in-unit laundry. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention in-unit washer/dryer, but there is no text stating that laundry is only communal or absent. Given that buyers care if any units offer this, the building is treated as offering some in-unit laundry options, with moderate confidence.

Five of seven recent MLS listings mark community laundry in the amenities, indicating a shared laundry facility in the building. The public remarks do not discuss laundry, but this is typical for standard laundry rooms, and the consistent checkbox data across most listings supports including community_laundry with high confidence.

Searched the public remarks for indicators of paid community laundry (coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, 'quarters', etc.). The remarks do not reference any community laundry or payment terms; they note a washer/dryer hookup in-unit.

Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'laundry on every level'. The remarks mention in-unit washer/dryer hookups but contain no indication of community laundry facilities on each floor.

At least two listings explicitly note one included parking stall, while MLS data show 4 of 7 listings with some type of parking and 3 of 7 with NONE. This pattern suggests the building offers a limited number of parking stalls that are available with some units but not others. Buyers interested in buildings with any on-site parking should consider that this building does have parking for some units.

At least 4 separate listing remarks reference a dedicated stall: 'One Assigned Covered Parking Stall', 'one parking stall included', 'rented parking stall is $140/mo', and a 'one parking' mention. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers assigned/reserved parking stalls.

MLS parking_features include covered/garage codes on 4 of 8 listings, and one remark explicitly says 'One Assigned Covered Parking Stall'. Three other remarks mention parking stalls without specifying covered. The evidence implies the building has covered parking stalls, but confirmation in remarks is limited across listings.

Listings reference assigned and rented stalls (including one assigned covered stall and a rented stall), with no language indicating parking is deeded. Absence of 'deeded' wording suggests parking is not owned with the unit.

Across all available listings there are no remarks or MLS flags for EV charging or stations. Given that EV charging is usually a marketed feature when present, this consistent omission suggests the building does not offer EV charging facilities. Buyers needing on-site EV charging should not expect it here.

There is a clear mention of a monthly parking rental fee of $140 for a rented stall in the public remarks.

No listing remarks mention guest or visitor parking, and the MLS GUEST checkbox is never used for this building. Because agents typically highlight guest stalls when available, this indicates the building lacks dedicated guest parking. Visitors likely must rely on street or off-site parking options.

There are no references in remarks to gated, card-access, or secured parking, and SECENT is not checked in any MLS entries. Given that such security is usually promoted, the consistent lack of mention suggests the building’s parking does not have a secured entry system. Buyers should not assume gated or controlled-access parking here.

No listings flag tandem parking in MLS features or mention it in narrative remarks. Because tandem stalls significantly affect usability and are usually called out, the lack of any reference points to standard (non-tandem) parking arrangements. Buyers should not expect tandem-style stalls in this building.

Across all reviewed listings, there is no indication of valet or attended parking services. Given how prominently valet is usually marketed when present, this strongly suggests the building does not provide valet parking. Residents should expect to park their own vehicles without valet assistance.

Searched remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found no references. No evidence of a formal parking waitlist system.

MLS data does not show an elevator amenity in any listing, and none of the remarks mention elevators or keyed/fob elevator access. This strongly suggests the building does not have a secure keyed elevator system to advertise to buyers.

Searched for terms indicating electronic card/fob access (key card, fob, card reader). The remarks mention 'Key Elevator for Security' but do not explicitly describe a card/fob access system, so no evidence of a security card system was found.

0 of 7 current MLS listings indicate security guard service, and no remarks mention a guard, 24/7 security, or any staffed security presence. Multiple different listings focus on location, views, and unit condition but never reference building security staff, suggesting the building does not offer this service.

Searched the remarks for references to patrolled security services. The remarks reference security via a 'Key Elevator' and note a resident manager, but there is no mention of a security patrol or roving security service.

None of the listings check a security system amenity, and no agent remarks reference security cameras or video surveillance anywhere on the property. Given multiple independent descriptions without mention of such systems, it is unlikely the building features notable video security marketed to buyers.

0 of 7 current listings have any central AC-related checkbox selected and no remarks reference central air, HVAC, or forced air. One listing specifically highlights natural cross-breeze plus a window AC in the bedroom rather than a central system, suggesting the building does not offer central AC.

0 of 7 listings indicate split or ductless AC in the MLS data, and no remarks describe mini-splits or ductless systems. The only detailed AC mention is a bedroom window AC, supporting the conclusion that split AC is not a building feature.

Most listings (5/7) mark window AC in the MLS inclusions, and one agent explicitly notes a bedroom window AC. This combination of checkbox data and specific descriptive text indicates that window AC units are present in the building’s units.

All 8 of 8 current MLS listings list concrete (CONCRE) as the construction material and historical records consistently identified the building as concrete. Public remarks do not explicitly state construction materials, but the unanimous MLS checkbox across multiple agents provides strong corroboration.

Across 7 listings, double wall construction is never selected or described. Given the consistent concrete designation and lack of any wood frame references, double wall construction is very unlikely.

Across all 7 listings, hollow tile is never selected or mentioned. This consistent absence strongly suggests the building is not classified as hollow tile construction in MLS.

All 7 listings omit masonry/stucco in the construction checkboxes and none describe a masonry-stucco structure in remarks. Given the consistent concrete designation, it is unlikely the building is classified as masonry/stucco in MLS data.

Across 7 listings, agents never select steel frame construction and no remarks reference a steel structural system. This consistent omission alongside concrete being selected indicates the building is not steel frame.

Although only 1/7 listings explicitly checks the slab field, that listing identifies a slab foundation and the building is consistently tagged as concrete, matching common local practice. The combination of this MLS entry and typical construction patterns supports treating a concrete slab foundation as present.

No analysis available

None of the 7 listings select wood frame construction, while all consistently select concrete. Given typical Waikiki midrise construction and the absence of any wood-frame mentions, wood frame construction can be confidently ruled out.

Only 2 of 8 current MLS listings include the ABOGRO checkbox and no public remarks reference above-ground construction. This is weak/implied evidence (possibly copy/paste inconsistency), so the feature is included with moderate confidence pending further verification from owners or site documentation.

None of the 7 listings indicate brick in the construction fields or in the remarks. The building is consistently represented as concrete, so brick construction is very unlikely.

None of the 7 listings indicate single wall construction and the building is consistently tagged as concrete. This pattern and building type make traditional single wall construction effectively ruled out.

The public remarks specifically reference approval for 30-day rentals. Per the feature definitions, a 30-day minimum indicates short-term (under 30-day) rentals are not permitted, so str_allowed is false.

No evidence in the remarks of a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. Additionally, because short-term rentals are not allowed (30-day minimum), hotel-rental-pool participation is not applicable.

No remarks indicate a mandatory rental pool or required participation, and with short-term rentals disallowed (30-day minimum), a mandatory hotel pool is not applicable.

None of the available remarks reference fee simple ownership, and the tenure field is not affirmatively populated as Fee Simple on any listing. Because missing or unchecked MLS tenure fields are common, the presence or absence of Fee Simple units in this building cannot be determined from current data.

No listings are positively tagged as Leasehold in the provided data, and the remarks do not discuss any land lease or lease expiration. With no explicit evidence either way, it is not possible to confirm whether the building has leasehold units.

Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and explicit years. No leasehold or lease expiry year is present in the public remarks, so the expiry year is unknown.

The remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved. This indicates VA financing is accepted for units in this building.

I looked for explicit statements about HOA/building being fully insured (walls-in coverage or similar). The public remarks do not mention building insurance coverage, so set to false with medium confidence based on no evidence.

None of the listings check the fire-sprinkler amenity or mention sprinklers in the remarks. Given that amenity checkboxes are often incomplete and there is no explicit statement about fire sprinklers, the presence or absence of a sprinkler system cannot be reliably determined.

I searched the public remarks for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified'). There are no references to such certification, so set to false with medium confidence due to absence of evidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No public remarks or MLS view fields indicate ocean or water views (CURRENT: 0 of 8 listings list OCEAN). Listings focus on Diamond Head, city, and mountain views but do not claim ocean or Pacific views, so the building does not present ocean-view units in the available listing data.

At least one public remark explicitly advertises a 'mountain view unit' and MLS view fields include MOUNTA on 2 of 8 listings, indicating some units offer mountain/Koolau (mauka) views. Evidence comes from multiple listings and MLS flags, so the building offers mountain-view units.

Several listing remarks highlight 'Diamond Head' views (e.g., 'Awesome Diamond Head' and 'unobstructed views of Diamond Head'), supported by MLS entries marking Diamond Head views. This is strong evidence that some units in the building have Diamond Head views.

Listing remarks include explicit references to 'captivating city views' and MLS view fields include CITY on multiple listings, demonstrating that some units offer city/downtown views. The evidence is consistent across remarks and MLS data.

Listings emphasize mountain, Diamond Head, and city views but never coastline views, and the MLS view fields omit any coastline tag. This indicates that coastline views are not a feature of this building’s units.

MLS data shows a garden view checked on one listing, with no contrary remarks indicating this is incorrect. This implies that some units likely face a garden or landscaped area, even though most listings do not highlight it.

The golf course is cited only as a nearby amenity, not as a view, and there are no MLS entries tagging golf course view. This indicates that units in this building do not have meaningful golf course views.

Location remarks reference being on the Ala Wai canal but never describe a canal, marina, or harbor view, and MLS data shows no listings marked with marina/canal view. This suggests that, despite proximity, the building does not offer recognized marina/canal view units.

At least one listing explicitly advertises 'Sunrise' views and MLS tags include SUNRIS on one listing, indicating some units have eastern exposure and morning sun. While limited to a subset of listings, the explicit remark supports including sunrise views.

One or more public remarks explicitly claim 'Sunset' views (the main listing notes 'Sunrise and Sunset Views'), which suggests some units on the property enjoy western/evening views. Although historical MLS fields previously did not mark SUNSET, the explicit current remark supports including sunset-view units.

Neither agent remarks nor MLS view data indicate any cemetery view. This is strong evidence that cemetery views are not a relevant factor for this building.

Searched the remarks for explicit statements such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit'. The remarks describe Diamond Head, sunrise/sunset and canal views but do not mention fireworks views from the building or units.

No analysis available

None of the listing remarks mention pets or pet restrictions, and importantly, no current MLS entries flag a 'no pets' restriction. While not definitively advertised as pet-friendly, the lack of any 'no pets' indications supports treating the building as allowing pets with moderate confidence.

Three out of seven listings explicitly mark a resident manager/RESMAN amenity, while the others are silent rather than contradictory. This repeated selection across multiple listings provides reasonably strong evidence that the building has an on-site or resident manager.

The building is marketed simply as a condominium, including references to VA approval and standard ownership, with no mention of hotel management or a rental pool. The only short-term rental language is a 30-day minimum, which is common for non-hotel condos and does not indicate condotel status.

All listings call these properties 'condominiums' and discuss them in typical condo terms (VA approved, individual units, parking stalls) with no mention of shares or cooperative ownership. With no COOTAX indicator and no textual evidence of a co-op structure, the building is almost certainly not a cooperative.