Hale Moani

Property data is unanimous that the building was constructed in 1973, with 12 out of 12 listings reporting this year. No listing remarks contradict or qualify this date.

Listings include units on floors up to at least the 15th floor, and no remarks specify a different total number of stories. Following the rule to use the highest observed floor number when no explicit building count is given, the building is treated as having 15 floors.

A remark notes there are 'only five units per floor,' and property data shows at least 15 floors with residential units, implying about 75 units in the building. Because no listing explicitly states the total number of units, this is an informed estimate rather than a directly confirmed figure.

I searched for numeric ownership language like "80% owner occupied" as well as qualitative phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not mention owner occupancy at all, so the current value of 48.00 is kept by default with low confidence.

I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "2 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording. The remarks only confirm elevator access, which supports the current value of 1 but does not justify changing it. Given the building context and lack of contrary evidence, the current value is retained at low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Where agents list what the maintenance covers, they consistently mention electricity, water, sewer, cable, internet, and hot water but never central A/C. With ACCEN unchecked across all MLS records, it is very likely central air conditioning is not included in the fees.

Strong, repeated evidence that cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. Across the remarks, agents repeatedly mention 'basic cable TV' and 'cable TV' alongside other utilities, matching the MLS checkbox pattern in nearly all listings.

There is moderate building-level evidence from MLS coding that common area electricity is included, with 12 of 14 listings marked OTCOEX. The remarks are mostly silent on this specific item, so this is supported more by the MLS pattern than by explicit agent descriptions.

None of the MLS records indicate cooperative taxes are included, and the building is marketed as fee simple rather than a co-op. This makes it virtually certain that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Very strong evidence that electricity is included. Multiple listings say 'maintenance fee covers electricity' or 'includes electricity,' and the MLS checkbox is present in nearly every record.

Agents repeatedly list what the fees cover but never reference gas service, and the GAS checkbox is unset on all MLS records. This strongly indicates gas is not included in the association fees (and likely not a significant building utility).

Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee for this building. The remarks explicitly say 'hot water' is covered in multiple listings, and the MLS data shows HOTWAT checked in most records.

Internet is supported by both MLS data and repeated agent remarks. Several listings say 'internet' is included, often grouped with electricity, cable TV, water, and sewer.

While the building fronts the Ala Wai Canal, none of the listings describe marina access or boat slips, and the MARINA inclusion flag is never used. This provides strong evidence that marina access or fees are not part of the association dues.

Extremely strong evidence that sewer is included. Every current MLS record has SEWER checked, and the remarks repeatedly list sewer as part of the maintenance fee.

Extremely strong evidence that water is included. All current MLS listings show WATER checked, and agent remarks consistently confirm water is part of the maintenance fee.

BBQ facilities are consistently supported by the public remarks and MLS data. At least 6 separate listing remarks mention phrases like 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grill,' and 'BBQ deck,' which suggests this is a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly. Combined with the current MLS hit rate (12/14), confidence is very high.

At least one listing explicitly lists a 'bike rack' among building amenities, indicating residents have a place to store bicycles on-site. Other listings are consistent with this and do not contradict it, supporting that the building offers bike storage as a shared amenity.

Views of the Ala Wai Canal are a selling point, but there is no suggestion of docking or boating facilities. MLS data supports the conclusion that there is no boat dock or marina amenity.

Parking is discussed (covered stalls, location), but no mention is made of car wash facilities. MLS data is consistent with there being no car wash amenity.

Amenities are consistently limited to pool, BBQ, community laundry, and bike rack; no clubhouse is ever referenced. The MLS data is fully consistent with the absence of a clubhouse.

Remarks focus on location, views, utilities-included maintenance fees, pool/BBQ, and security via video/fob, but there is no reference to any concierge or front-desk services. With 0/12 MLS indications and no textual evidence, it is highly likely there is no concierge at this building.

While the building allows pets ('PET-FRIENDLY'), there is no indication of a specific on-site dog park or run. MLS amenity data aligns with the absence of this feature.

Multiple agents emphasize 'secured' entry via video/fob and other amenities like pool, BBQ, and community laundry, but there is no mention of a staffed doorman or lobby attendant in any listing. This consistent omission alongside 0/12 DOORMA entries makes it very likely the building has no doorman service.

Across 12 listings, none reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. Combined with 0/12 MLS amenity checkboxes, this is strong evidence the building lacks an exercise facility.

Despite being a selling point in luxury buildings, no courtesy car or limo service is advertised here. Combined with MLS data, this strongly indicates no such service.

None of the 12 listings highlight any meeting or conference facilities, which would typically be marketed if available. MLS checkboxes also omit this feature.

Patio/deck amenities are strongly supported for this building. Across the provided listings, multiple agents mention a 'wrap-around lanai,' 'private lanai,' and even a 'BBQ deck' on the same floor, indicating outdoor living space is a recurring building feature. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing 8/14 listings marked PATDEC/COVPAT, so confidence is very high.

Any walking or jogging is implied to be off-site along the Ala Wai area, not a controlled building feature. MLS data does not mark a jogging path amenity.

Across all 12 listings, family-oriented play amenities are never mentioned, which would be highly marketable if present. MLS data uniformly shows no playground amenity.

Across 12 listings, there are no references to a private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed ground-level outdoor space—only lanais, decks, and pool/BBQ areas typical of a high-rise. This strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard areas for units.

Although some listings mention golf course views, none claim an on-site putting green. The MLS data corroborates that no such amenity exists at this building.

Multiple agents independently reference a pool/BBQ area or deck, indicating a dedicated shared recreation deck rather than just a small grill space. With consistent MLS tagging, this supports a building-level recreation area.

Across all listings, amenities are described as pool, BBQ, community laundry, and bike rack, with no recreation or game room mentioned. MLS data also does not show a rec room, indicating it likely does not exist.

The building is marketed for its location near many restaurants, not for in-building dining. Absence of any direct claim and MLS omission indicate no on-site restaurant.

Views and outdoor space are consistently described in terms of private lanais and the pool/BBQ deck, not a rooftop. The complete absence in MLS data further indicates no shared rooftop amenity.

For a sauna, agents typically highlight it alongside pool/gym amenities, but it is never mentioned. MLS amenity fields agree that no sauna is present.

None of the 12 listings for this building mention storage lockers or extra building storage, and MLS amenities never include any storage options. The only 'storage' comments are about in-unit kitchen cabinets, suggesting there are no dedicated storage units available to residents. Based on consistent omission across all agents, this is treated as a non-existent building amenity.

I looked for 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' 'surf storage,' and 'bike and surfboard storage.' The remarks only mention a bike rack, with no evidence of surfboard storage facilities.

None of the 12 listings reference tennis courts or related facilities, and MLS data uniformly omits this amenity. This strongly indicates the building does not offer tennis courts.

Trash chute appears to be a building amenity based on the current MLS records, which list it in all 14/14 listings. The public remarks do not explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, but the perfect MLS consistency makes this a strong building-level feature despite the lack of narrative confirmation. There is no evidence suggesting the MLS entries are being corrected or that the feature was removed.

All references to parking are to individual stalls rather than a managed service, and no listing mentions 'valet' or similar services. The combination of remarks and MLS checkbox data strongly supports that the building does not offer valet service.

Across 12 listings, agents highlight pool, BBQ, parking, and secure entry but never mention perimeter walls, fencing, or gates. The complete absence of 'gated' or 'fenced' language and 0/12 MLS flags strongly indicate there is no enclosing wall or fence system for the property.

Amenity descriptions consistently limit water features to a standard pool. The lack of any hot tub or spa reference plus MLS data indicates no whirlpool facility.

Pool is clearly a building amenity at Hale Moani. At least 9 listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention a pool, including phrases like "building amenities include pool," "pool after a day out," and "on-site pool." The repeated references across different listings/agents strongly support that this is a real, shared feature and not just copy-paste noise.

While many listings confirm the presence of a shared pool, none of the 12 current MLS entries mark it as heated and no remarks use terms like 'heated pool' or 'heated swimming pool'. The consistent lack of any 'heated' description across agents and remarks indicates the building’s pool is not heated.

I looked for 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' and 'saline pool.' The remarks repeatedly confirm a pool exists, but they do not describe it as saltwater.

No listing remarks reference in-unit washers or dryers, even for upgraded and penthouse units, and 0/12 MLS inclusion checkboxes indicate a washer/dryer. Multiple agents instead emphasize shared/community laundry, suggesting laundry is provided communally rather than in individual units.

Very strong evidence the building has shared laundry facilities. The MLS amenities checkbox is set on all 14 current listings, and several independent remarks explicitly mention "community laundry," "laundry," or similar building-level shared laundry access. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a one-off copy-paste mention.

I looked for explicit payment language such as 'coin laundry,' 'coin-op,' 'quarters,' 'card operated,' or a laundry fee. The listings only say 'community laundry,' so there is no public-remarks evidence that it is paid laundry.

I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and 'floor-by-floor laundry.' The remarks only mention community laundry as a building amenity, with no indication that laundry facilities exist on every floor.

Every recent listing indicates the presence of at least one parking stall, with remarks such as "WITH PARKING" and "1 bed, 1 bath, 1 parking unit." MLS parking_features show that all 12 of 12 listings have a parking type selected and none indicate no parking. This strongly supports that the building offers on-site parking for residents.

Strong evidence that Hale Moani offers assigned/reserved parking. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention assigned-style parking language such as "reserved parking stall," "one designed parking stall," and a parking stall included with the unit, which matches the current MLS pattern (11/14 listings marked ASSIGN).

There is very strong evidence that the building has covered parking. The current MLS data is consistent (11/14 listings show covered/garage-type parking), and multiple agent remarks explicitly say "1 covered parking stall included," "comes with covered parking," and "1 covered parking spot."

I looked for deeded/owned-parking wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks describe parking as included, reserved, covered, or designated, but do not state that it is deeded with the unit.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to EV charging, charging stations, or similar amenities. MLS parking_features for 12 of 12 listings omit the EVCHRG checkbox. Given this consistent absence, it is highly likely the building does not offer dedicated EV charging stations.

I searched for language like parking fee, monthly parking charge, rental fee, or additional parking cost. The listings consistently describe parking as included, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee in the public remarks.

None of the listing remarks mention "guest parking" or "visitor parking," despite detailing other amenities such as pool, BBQ, and bike rack. Additionally, no MLS records for the 12 listings check the GUEST parking feature. This strongly suggests that formal guest parking is not available at this building.

Remarks describe a "secured building with fob entry" but do not specifically state that the parking area itself is gated or access-controlled. MLS parking_features never mark SECENT for any of the 12 listings. This pattern indicates that, while the building is secure, the parking is not clearly marketed as separately secured entry parking.

Listing remarks talk about a "large parking stall that potentially fits a car plus a motorcycle or moped" but never use terms like "tandem" or "back-to-back." The TANDEM option is unchecked in all 12 MLS entries. This makes it very likely that tandem parking is not a standard or advertised configuration in this building.

The building is described as a conventional Waikiki condo with self-use parking, and no listing mentions valet or attended parking services. MLS data also show that none of the 12 listings select the VALET option. Together, this provides very strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking.

I searched for phrases such as parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a queue for parking. Nothing in the public remarks indicates a waitlist system for parking.

Security is described as '24/7 video and key fob security' and 'fob entry,' but agents never say the elevator itself is keyed or requires a fob. Combined with 0/12 MLS ELEVAT checkboxes, the evidence suggests there is secure building entry but not a keyed/fob-access elevator system.

This is strongly supported by the remarks. Multiple listings mention key fob/fob entry and video security, which matches card/fob access security.

Agents repeatedly describe Hale Moani as a 'secured' or 'secure, well-managed' building but never mention a guard or on-site security personnel. With 0/12 MLS checkboxes for SECGUA and no guard-related language across remarks, this strongly indicates there is no security guard service.

I searched for any indication of on-site patrol or roving security. The remarks support secured access with '24/7 key fob and video security' and 'secured building,' but they do not mention patrol service.

At least 1/12 listings clearly mentions '24/7 video ... security,' providing explicit evidence of video surveillance at the building. Other remarks refer to a 'secured' or 'secure, well-managed' building, supporting the presence of a building-wide video security system despite MLS checkboxes being left blank.

No listings (0/12) indicate central AC in MLS checkboxes, and no remarks mention 'central air', 'HVAC', or similar terms. Given how prominently a building-wide system is typically marketed, this consistent absence across multiple agents and listings strongly suggests the building does not have central air conditioning.

Across 12 listings, no MLS checkbox entries (ACSPL) or remarks mention split, ductless, or mini-split AC systems. Given the number of listings and that recent upgrades are otherwise well-documented, this strongly indicates that units in the building do not have split AC systems.

Window A/C appears on 5 of 14 current MLS listings (ACWIUN), suggesting some units offer it. However, the public remarks across the listings do not explicitly mention window air conditioners or wall units, so this looks like moderate MLS-driven evidence rather than strong remark confirmation. I would treat this as available in some units, but not clearly described by multiple agents.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: all 14 current listings include CONCRE. The remarks describe a multi-story Waikiki condo building with common amenities and no indication of any different construction type, so this appears to be a stable building-level fact.

None of the 12 listings indicate double-wall construction, and the structure is repeatedly characterized as a concrete Waikiki condo tower. In Hawaii, double-wall refers mainly to wood-framed homes, which this is not. The consistent absence of this checkbox supports a negative conclusion.

All listings omit hollow tile in the construction materials, while unanimously selecting concrete instead. Remarks never mention hollow tile walls or similar. This pattern across many agents suggests hollow tile is not a defining construction type for this building.

Masonry/stucco is not well supported: only 2 of 14 listings carry MASSTU, and none of the public remarks describe masonry or stucco construction. The repeated copy-paste style remarks focus on views, parking, pool, and laundry, which suggests the construction checkbox is likely inconsistent or inaccurate.

No listings select steel frame in the construction materials, while all instead select concrete. Remarks emphasize a standard Waikiki condo tower with nothing suggesting a steel-frame structure. Combined MLS and market norms make steel-frame construction unlikely here.

Slab construction appears in a minority of current listings, 5 out of 14. The public remarks do not explicitly confirm a concrete slab foundation, so this is supported mainly by the MLS checkbox data rather than by descriptive text. That makes it a reasonable but not high-confidence building feature.

No analysis available

0/12 listings mark wood frame, and remarks repeatedly describe a secure, elevator-served high-rise building (penthouses, high floors, multiple units per level). Given the building type and local construction norms, wood-frame construction is highly unlikely. The absence of this checkbox across all agents supports this conclusion.

Half of the listings explicitly mark above-ground construction, and none contradict it; remarks describe high-floor and penthouse units, confirming a raised multi-story structure. While some agents do not check this box (likely omission), the combination of MLS data and building form makes above-ground construction likely applicable.

None of the listings mention or check brick construction, and the building is presented as a typical concrete Waikiki condo tower. Given local practices and the lack of any brick-related language, brick construction can be safely ruled out. Multiple independent agents omitting this box reinforces that it is not a brick building.

All listings omit single-wall construction and instead mark concrete, and the remarks describe a secure elevator building with penthouse and high-floor units. This is incompatible with traditional single-wall construction. The consistent data across many agents makes single-wall construction effectively certain to be absent.

I looked for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal short-term rental, NUC/TVU, vacation rental language, or minimum-night rules. None were mentioned in the listings, so there is no public-remarks evidence that STRs are allowed.

I searched for hotel pool references such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or branded pool participation. There are no such remarks, and because STR is not evidenced as allowed, this must be false. High confidence due to the prerequisite rule.

I looked for wording like "mandatory pool," "must participate," "cannot opt out," or similar required-rental language. None was found in the public remarks. Since STR is not indicated as allowed, mandatory pool participation cannot apply and is false.

At least one listing clearly states the unit is 'fee simple,' establishing that fee simple ownership exists in this building. No other listing mentions leasehold or land lease terms, suggesting fee simple is common here.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to leasehold or lease terms, and one unit is explicitly marketed as 'fee simple.' Given leasehold status is typically emphasized in this market, the evidence points to this being an all–fee simple building with no leasehold units noted.

I looked for any ground-lease or leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or a 4-digit expiry year, but found none. The public remarks instead indicate fee simple ownership, so there is no lease expiry to report.

Multiple listings explicitly reference VA buyers, which is strong public-remarks evidence that the building accepts VA financing. No contrary remarks were found. This is a high-confidence true.

Multiple remarks directly state that the building has full hurricane coverage and is fully insured. That is strong evidence of walls-in/full building insurance, so this feature is marked true with high confidence.

No listing remarks mention fire sprinklers, and the MLS amenity for sprinklers is unchecked on all 12 listings. This consistent absence strongly suggests the building does not have a marketed fire sprinkler system.

I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the listings indicates the building has passed such an evaluation. Because there is no current value provided, this remains unknown.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least one listing's public remarks explicitly state 'breathtaking OCEAN...views', and historical data previously indicated strong evidence for ocean views. While the structured MLS view_descriptions currently show 0/13 with OCEAN (possible checkbox omission), agent remarks across listings still reference ocean views, so the building offers ocean-view units.

This feature is strongly supported across the listings: mountain views are mentioned in the majority of remarks, often alongside Ala Wai Canal or city views. Key phrases include 'Ko'olau Mountains,' 'mountain views,' 'island mountain View,' and 'mauka views,' suggesting this is a consistent building-level offering rather than a one-off unit trait.

A high-floor corner listing explicitly mentions 'Diamond Head views' and again lists 'Diamond Head with sunrise' among its view corridors. This, along with one MLS Diamond Head tag, confirms that some units in the building do enjoy Diamond Head views.

City views are repeatedly mentioned in remarks (e.g., 'City, mountain, and canal views', 'sparkling city lights'), and 2/13 current MLS view_descriptions include CITY. Multiple agents describe city views, indicating the building offers units with city vistas.

Agents describe an 'OCEAN' view in one case but never characterize it as a 'coastline' or 'shoreline' view, and no MLS entries use a coastline tag. This suggests the building offers ocean glimpses rather than expansive coastline views as a defining feature.

Listings consistently promote canal, mountain, city, ocean, golf course, and Diamond Head views but never mention garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Given the building’s urban/canal frontage and complete absence of such remarks, units with true garden views are unlikely.

Golf course views are explicitly confirmed in the remarks, with one listing directly stating unobstructed views of the 'golf course.' While fewer listings mention it than mountain or canal views, the evidence is direct and consistent with the MLS pattern.

The building clearly offers canal/marina-type views in many units. Across multiple remarks, agents repeatedly advertise 'Ala Wai Canal,' 'canal views,' and 'Ala Wai Canal with Diamond Head views,' showing consistent support rather than copy-paste noise.

Sunrise views are supported by at least one explicit remark and the current MLS trend. The strongest phrase is 'Diamond Head with sunrise,' which aligns with the building’s east-facing outlook and morning light exposure.

Despite extensive marketing of views (mountain, canal, city lights, ocean, golf course, Diamond Head with sunrise), there are no references to sunsets or evening western exposure. This persistent omission suggests sunset views are not a selling feature for this building’s units.

There are zero references to any cemetery view despite very detailed view marketing in the remarks and no MLS cemetery view tags. Considering the known urban/canal surroundings, it's safe to conclude the building does not offer cemetery views.

I searched for explicit references like 'watch fireworks from the lanai,' 'fireworks view from unit,' or 'see fireworks from building.' The remarks mention canal, mountain, ocean, city, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about fireworks views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple independent agents describe the building as 'PET-FRIENDLY' and 'pet-friendly', and there are no contrary restrictions mentioned. This provides strong evidence that the building allows pets, likely with standard condo rules rather than a blanket prohibition.

Resident manager is supported by current MLS amenities data rather than the agent remarks: 9 of 14 listings include RESMAN. None of the provided public remarks explicitly say “resident manager” or “on-site manager,” so this appears to be an MLS-inherited building feature rather than repeated copy in descriptions, but the consistency is strong enough to keep it as present.

Listings market the property as a conventional Waikiki condominium suitable for primary residents and long-term investors, with no hotel branding or front-desk/rental-pool language. The absence of any condotel terminology across many listings indicates it is not operated as a condotel.

The building is repeatedly referred to as a fee simple condominium without any mention of cooperative structure or share-based ownership. Both the wording in remarks and the MLS fee coding support that this is not a co-op building.