Hale Kaloapau
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale Kaloapau
Building Overview
Hale Kaloapau in Mililani-Waipio, built 1972 — pets and short-term rentals not allowed per available MLS data.
About Hale Kaloapau
Based on MLS data, Hale Kaloapau is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1972. Specific details about building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies and amenities noted in the MLS records include a no-pets policy and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No additional amenity lists (such as pools, fitness centers, or common areas) are specified in the provided data.
Information about parking, maintenance fees, homeowners association details, and other charges is not included in the MLS extract. Buyers should verify parking, fees, management, and any other material details with the listing agent or current managing entity, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Owner-occupancy percentage is not provided in the remarks. I searched for explicit phrases and numeric percentages and found none; therefore the percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
No explicit mention of any elevators in the public remarks. I searched the remarks for phrases like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators' and found none. Without explicit wording, cannot infer a numeric elevator count, so value is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes indicate common area electricity is included in 8 of 9 listings ('OTCOEX' present). No public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', suggesting the MLS checkbox is the primary evidence and that agent copy/paste cannot be ruled out.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are 0 mentions of 'hot water included' (HOTWAT) in MLS checkbox data and 8 of 9 listings include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions—strong evidence that hot water is unit-supplied and not included in the HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes indicate sewer is included in 8 of 9 listings ('SEWER' present). No public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA', so the MLS flags are the primary evidence but lack corroborating agent remarks.
MLS checkbox data shows water included in 8 of 9 listings ('WATER' present). Public remarks do not mention 'water included' or 'water in HOA', so inclusion is supported mainly by MLS entries and may reflect agent checkbox usage rather than detailed remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of the listing remark blocks explicitly mention private fenced/enclosed outdoor space (quotes include 'fully fenced and cemented private patio', 'enclosed fenced yard', and 'private, fenced-in back patio and yard'). This aligns with MLS checkbox data showing PRIYAR in 8/9 current listings. The repeated, detailed remarks across multiple listings provide strong evidence the building offers private yard/private patio space for units.
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly reference access to MTA amenities and nearby Rec Center 3 ("7 recreation centers", "Rec 3 is conveniently located just across the street", "nearby recreation center offers a pool, tennis/pickleball court"). Although only 3/9 listings have the RECARE checkbox, consistent agent remarks across listings indicate building residents use shared recreation facilities, so the building should be marked as having a recreation area available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (and MLS checkboxes on 4/9) mention access to MTA community pools and Rec Center 3 'just across the street' or 'offers a pool'. Remarks repeatedly state 'community pools', 'rec center offers a pool', and 'access to the Mililani Town Association ... pools', indicating the property offers pool access through association amenities rather than an exclusive in-building pool. Evidence is consistent across several agents but primarily describes shared/community pools.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current listings indicate washer/dryer inclusions and multiple agent remarks explicitly describe in-unit laundry — phrases include 'brand-new stacked Washer/Dryer', 'convenient washer and dryer are located in-unit', and 'new washer/dryer'. Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All listings (9/9) and the public remarks consistently state the unit comes with two assigned/reserved parking stalls — key phrases include "2 assigned parking stalls", "two side-by-side parking stalls", and "2 reserved parking stalls." MLS checkbox data also indicates parking on every listing, and multiple agents repeat the same assigned-stall language, indicating strong, corroborated evidence that the building provides parking.
No analysis available
Although 3 of 9 MLS records have a covered/garage flag, none of the public remarks (across multiple agent listings) mention covered or enclosed parking — they only refer to "parking stalls", "reserved/assigned parking stalls", or street parking. This suggests covered parking is likely not a building-wide feature; evidence is indirect and mixed (MLS flags vs. consistent remarks), so confidence is moderate and further verification is recommended.
Listings repeatedly mention assigned/reserved parking stalls which indicates parking is provided, but there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded. Because 'deeded' is not mentioned, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rent' and found none. There is no evidence about a parking fee, so the value is unknown (null).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found no references. In absence of any mention and no prior data, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 9 current MLS listings list double wall (DOUWAL) in construction_materials, yet none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' The signal comes from MLS checkbox prevalence but lacks corroborating remarks and may be agent-provided rather than observed, so confidence remains low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 9 current MLS listings list SLAB in construction_materials. Remarks reference a 'fully fenced and cemented private patio' but do not explicitly state the building is on a concrete slab or has a 'concrete slab foundation.' Because the patio wording does not confirm foundation type and MLS checks are the only source, confidence is very low.
No analysis available
7 of 9 current MLS listings list wood frame (WOOFRA) in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' Evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and may reflect agent copy/paste; remarks do not confirm construction type, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements permitting or describing short-term/vacation rentals and found none. With no evidence one way or the other and no prior data, set to false with medium confidence. Per rules, related STR pool fields are set false as well.
I looked for terms such as 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or mention of being managed by a hotel. No such language appears. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, this must be false.
I searched for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found none. Since STR is not indicated as allowed and no rental program is mentioned, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or a 4-digit expiry year. There is no reference to leasehold tenure or any lease expiry date, so the expiry year is unknown (null).
Remarks explicitly state VA assumable financing is available. This is direct language indicating VA financing/assumability, so set to true with high confidence.
The public remarks do not state that the HOA provides full/walls-in insurance. Because there is no explicit insurance wording, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence = likely not stated).
No analysis available
There is no statement in the public remarks that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Absence of any FLSE-related language leads to a default false with medium confidence per rules (no explicit mention).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 9 current MLS listings include GARDEN in their view_descriptions and 3 of 9 list NONE. The public remarks for this unit describe a private fenced patio, 'open green space behind', and planted papaya/lime/orange/avocado trees, which imply garden/courtyard views for at least some units. Evidence is moderate — present in MLS view flags for a minority of listings and supported by unit remarks rather than uniform agent statements, so include the feature for buyers seeking garden-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the nine provided public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (0/9). The MLS amenity RESMAN appears in only 1 of 9 listings, and there is no prior confidence/history for this feature, so the evidence points to an agent checkbox mistake rather than a true building feature. Given the lack of any explicit mention across multiple agents, the building is unlikely to have a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.