Hale Anaole Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale Anaole Apartments
Building Overview
Hale Anaole Apartments in Kaneohe — concrete building (1976) with mountain views and on-site BBQ area.
About Hale Anaole Apartments
Hale Anaole Apartments is located in the Kaneohe neighborhood and was built in 1976. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and offers mountain views. MLS data does not specify unit count or square footage.
Key features include a shared BBQ area and a resident manager on site. Based on MLS data, the property presents mountain-facing views as a noted feature.
Additional details from the MLS indicate assigned parking is available along with guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided information. Management company is listed as Unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy information such as a percentage, majority owner-occupied wording, or highly owner-occupied descriptions, but found none. Without direct remarks evidence, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks directly and repeatedly confirm that the building has two elevators. This matches the current value exactly, so no change is needed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is consistently confirmed across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly state “maintenance fees include water, electric, & cable,” “basic cable,” “cable and internet,” and “cable TV,” showing this is not an isolated agent entry. The evidence is strong and repeated across different listings, suggesting a stable building feature.
There is good evidence that association fees cover common area expenses or maintenance. Remarks reference “common expenses,” “common area maintenance,” “manicured common areas,” and similar wording, which aligns with the MLS OTCOEX flag. This appears to be a real building-level fee inclusion, though less universally stated than utilities like water or sewer.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is one of the clearest building features in the dataset. Many listings say “electricity included,” “maintenance fee includes electricity,” or list utilities such as “electric, water, sewer, basic cable,” confirming broad consistency. The pattern is repeated across multiple agents and listing types, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
Hot water is repeatedly described as included in the maintenance fee. Listings say “hot water all included,” “maintenance fee includes hot water,” and utility bundles that include hot water alongside electricity, water, and sewer. There is no meaningful contradictory evidence in the remarks, so this remains high confidence.
Internet inclusion appears consistently in the remarks and is backed by the MLS data. The repeated phrasing across different listings suggests this is a genuine building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is unequivocally supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Several listings explicitly say “sewer included” or bundle it with other included utilities, and the historical data is unanimous. This is a definitive building-level feature.
Water is one of the most certain included utilities in the building. The remarks repeatedly say “water included” or include water in utility bundles alongside electricity, sewer, and cable, matching the unanimous MLS history. Confidence is maximal.
Strong building-level evidence for BBQ/grilling amenities. Multiple listings reference a "BBQ area," "small bbq area," "BBQ/Grill," and even "outdoor grill," across different remarks and agents, which strongly supports that the building offers shared BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Good building-level evidence for a car wash amenity. Current remarks repeatedly cite "car wash area," "car wash station," and "car wash" among the shared amenities, consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is credible building-level evidence for a meeting/conference room, though it is not as widespread as tennis or BBQ. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'Meeting/Conference room' or list a 'meeting room' among amenities, while some others mention a rec room instead. The MLS data supports this as a real but less commonly advertised shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence for a recreation area/room. Several remarks explicitly name a 'recreation area,' 'rec room,' or 'Meeting/Conference room,' suggesting a shared amenity rather than a unit-specific feature. The MLS coverage is not universal (7/20), but the repeated references across listings support inclusion with solid confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Extremely strong evidence that the building has tennis court facilities. Dozens of current remarks mention "tennis court" or "tennis courts," often alongside other shared amenities, indicating this is a building-level feature and not a one-off copy-paste error.
There is credible evidence that the building has a trash chute system. Only one supplied remark explicitly mentions being 'near the elevator and trash chute,' but the current MLS data shows TRACHU in 13/20 listings, which supports a building-level amenity rather than a copy/paste mistake. This is weaker than tennis or BBQ but still sufficient to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across numerous listings confirms in-unit laundry is available in this building. Multiple remarks explicitly say "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer and dryer are located conveniently in your unit," and "stackable washer dryer area," suggesting this is not a one-off copy-paste error but a consistent building feature. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing washer/dryer in the inclusions for 18 of 20 listings.
Multiple current listing remarks explicitly mention building-level laundry facilities — e.g., 'community laundry (in addition to unit's appliances)', 'Common Laundry', and 'community laundry on the grounds.' At least 5–7 separate unit remarks refer to shared laundry or common laundry access, and this corroborates prior MLS checkbox history (6/20 listings with COMLAU) so evidence is strong across multiple agents/listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. The current MLS data shows parking features in 20/20 listings, and the remarks repeatedly reference parking stalls, garages/parking stalls, and guest parking access. This is strong, consistent evidence from multiple listings and agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall," "one assigned parking stall," and even "two assigned parking stalls," matching the high-confidence MLS pattern. This looks consistent across different agents, not a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking appears to be available at the building, though not as universally documented as assigned parking. At least two remarks explicitly mention covered parking, including "one is covered" and "one covered parking stall," while the MLS data shows only 2/20 current records flagging covered/garage parking. Evidence supports that covered stalls exist for some units.
The listings describe parking as assigned, covered, or included with the unit, but not deeded. I looked for explicit deeded/owned stall language and found none.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly charges or rental costs for stalls, but found no such mention. The remarks only describe assigned parking and guest parking.
Guest parking is clearly available at the building. Many remarks independently mention it, including "ample guest parking," "guest parking for visitors," "6 guest parking stalls," and "9 guest parking stalls." The frequency and consistency across listings make this a very strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a parking waitlist system and found none. The listings instead note assigned parking, guest parking, and street parking availability.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a real building feature based on current MLS data, with 15 of 20 listings coded CONCRE. No remarks explicitly discuss the structure, but the consistent checkbox data across many listings suggests this is not just a one-off agent entry.
Double wall construction is only weakly supported: 9 of 20 current MLS records carry the DOUWAL code, but none of the public remarks describe 'double wall,' 'double-wall construction,' or 'two walls.' This looks more like checkbox-level evidence than confirmed narrative evidence.
Hollow tile construction appears in the current MLS data for 3 of 20 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "hollow tile" or describe hollow tile construction. This is moderate evidence at the building level, but the lack of supporting remarks suggests it may still be a copied MLS entry rather than independently verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided remarks mention above ground construction in any explicit or implied way. While 6/20 current MLS records show ABOGRO, the lack of supporting listing comments across the dataset makes this look like weak, possibly copied MLS data rather than verified construction information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, but found none. With no STR-related language in the public remarks, the safest reading is that STR is not allowed or at least not supported by the listings.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed operations or branded pool participation and found nothing. Because STR is not supported in the remarks, this must also be false.
I searched for any language suggesting mandatory participation in a rental pool and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR or a hotel program, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end, or renewal dates, but found nothing. Since no 4-digit lease end year is provided, this remains unknown.
The remarks directly support VA financing approval for this building. Multiple listings mention VA assumable loans and one explicitly says the building is VA approved, which is strong public evidence.
There is repeated explicit evidence that the building is fully insured, at least for hurricane coverage. The wording is strong and consistent across multiple listings, so this feature is high confidence true.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. Secure building, VA approved, and hurricane coverage references do not confirm this specific feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least nine separate listing remarks mention ocean or Kaneohe Bay views (examples: 'Fabulous unobstructed ocean view of Kaneohe Bay', 'city and ocean views', 'Pacific Ocean'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and buildings/units, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers mountain-view units. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention Koolau/Ko'olau mountain views, mauka/mountain views, or views of the mountain range from lanais, front doors, living rooms, and picture windows. The repeated wording across multiple agents suggests this is a real and recurring feature of the building, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
There are several explicit references to city views across the remarks, including 'Beautiful city and sunrise views!' and 'stunning city and ocean views.' The current MLS data also supports this with CITY appearing in 7 of 20 listings, suggesting this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Coastline-specific language appears in at least one listing remark ('Views of the Windward Coast from living') and one MLS listing coded COASTL, indicating some units provide coastline/shoreline views. Mentions are limited compared with ocean/mountain notes, so confidence is moderate.
Garden/landscaped views are strongly supported across the current listings. At least 4 listings explicitly mention garden-related views or greenery, including phrases like “peaceful greenbelt views,” “view of the Koolau Mountain and Garden,” and “lush view ... and gardens from lanai.” This aligns with the prior high-confidence signal and does not appear to be a one-off or accidental MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are directly mentioned in the remarks, most clearly in 'Beautiful city and sunrise views!' and in east-facing language that implies morning light. The current MLS data shows SUNRIS in 4 of 20 listings, which supports that some units in the building do have this feature.
At least 2 current public remarks explicitly mention sunsets: "Relax and enjoy the sunset on your private lanai overlooking..." and "enjoy peaceful sunsets and the natural beauty...". Historical data was High confidence that the building offers sunset views, and multiple agent remarks across listings continue to reference sunsets rather than appearing as a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager presence is strongly supported across the listing set: at least 14 of 20 listings show RESMAN, and multiple remarks explicitly say the building has an “on-site resident manager” or a manager “living on property.” The evidence is consistent across different agents and time periods, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.