Governor Cleghorn

The MLS property data consistently shows 1966 as the year built for every listing reviewed. No remarks indicate major reconstruction that would alter the original construction year, so 1966 is accepted with high confidence.

Across the available listings, the highest unit floor explicitly or implicitly referenced is the 9th floor (e.g., one unit is stated to be on the 8th floor and property data shows a unit on the 9th). In the absence of remarks specifying a taller structure or a higher 'top floor,' the building is assumed to have at least 9 floors, which is used as the best estimate.

No listing remarks reference the total unit count in the building. Without explicit statements or corroborating MLS fields, the total number of units cannot be determined.

Remarks confirm that a majority of units are owner-occupied, aligning with the current 52% value. Since no listing gives a specific numeric percentage, the existing figure is kept and moderately supported by the "over half" statement.

Listings confirm the presence of an elevator but never state the total number serving the building. With no explicit elevator count in the remarks, the existing value of 2 elevators is retained, but the exact number remains weakly supported.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence that central air conditioning costs are included in the maintenance fee. Absence across all listings suggests this is not a covered item.

One detailed remark clearly says, "The low maintenance fee includes cable TV, sewer, and water," directly confirming cable is included. This matches the MLS data where CABTV is checked on all 7 listings. Evidence is consistent across agents and time, so cable inclusion is very reliable.

A majority of MLS entries (3/5) list common area electricity as included in association fees. While remarks do not spell this out, the repeated MLS checkbox use suggests common electricity is included.

No MLS entries indicate cooperative taxes are included, and the building is marketed as a condominium rather than a co-op. There is no sign that co-op taxes apply or are part of the fees.

Electricity is billed separately to occupants, as directly stated in the remarks, and is not checked in any MLS association_fee_includes fields. This is strong evidence that electricity is not part of the fee.

There is no MLS checkbox or remark evidence that gas is included in the maintenance fee. This consistent absence across listings indicates gas is not covered.

The remarks that itemize included utilities mention only cable TV, sewer, and water, with no reference to hot water. MLS data shows a mix of HOTWAT and explicit in-unit water heaters (WTRHTR), strongly suggesting hot water is generated in individual units rather than provided by the building. Prior high-confidence assessment that hot water is not included remains consistent with current evidence.

Listings that clearly list what the maintenance fee covers never mention internet or Wi‑Fi, even when highlighting low fees as a selling point. With only partial MLS checkbox usage and no textual support, it is very likely that internet is not included in the HOA fees. This aligns with the previous high-confidence assessment that internet service is not part of the maintenance fee.

There is no suggestion in MLS data or remarks that the building includes marina access or marina fees in the HOA. The location and marketing focus confirm that marina-related costs are not part of the fees.

One unit description states, "The low maintenance fee includes cable TV, sewer, and water," directly confirming sewer is included. This is reinforced by the SEWER checkbox appearing on all 7 MLS listings. Consistent textual and MLS evidence from multiple agents supports sewer inclusion with high confidence.

A detailed listing clearly notes that the low maintenance fee includes "cable TV, sewer, and water," directly confirming water is covered. This matches the universal WATER checkbox in the current MLS data. Evidence across listings and agents strongly supports that water is included in the HOA fees.

None of the listings mention BBQ grills or an outdoor grilling area. The MLS amenities consistently omit BBQ, indicating the building likely has no dedicated BBQ facilities.

No listing remarks mention bicycle storage, bike rooms, or racks, and 0 of 5 MLS records list bike storage as an amenity. This uniform lack of evidence across multiple agents and listings supports the conclusion that the building does not offer bike storage.

Remarks emphasize walking distance to Waikiki Beach, not direct waterfront or docking facilities. With no mention of a marina or boat slips and no MLS support, a boat dock can be ruled out.

Across five listings, not a single remark highlights a car wash station, which would typically be noted if present. With only a minority of MLS entries checking this box and no descriptive support, it is more likely the building does not offer a car wash amenity.

None of the listings describe a clubhouse or community center. The clubhouse amenity is unchecked in all MLS records, indicating the building does not provide this feature.

Concierge or staffed front-desk services are not referenced anywhere in the remarks, which instead focus on location, interior upgrades, and the pool. With 0/5 MLS entries marking a concierge feature, it is very likely the building does not offer concierge service.

None of the agents reference a dog park, dog run, or pet exercise area. Combined with the absence of this amenity in MLS, the building almost certainly lacks a dedicated dog park.

Doorman service is a major amenity and would almost certainly appear in remarks or MLS checkboxes. The complete absence of references across all current listings strongly indicates there is no doorman or lobby attendant at this building.

Across five listings, none reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. MLS amenities for this building also never list an exercise room, suggesting the building does not offer this feature.

Listings for this modest Waikiki condo focus on features like parking and a pool, not concierge-style transportation. The absence of limo or house car service in both remarks and MLS strongly indicates it is not offered.

The building is presented as a residential condo without shared meeting or conference facilities. MLS amenities corroborate this by never listing a meeting room.

3 of 5 listings reference a lanai, including phrases like “relax on the lanai of your charming oasis” and “Spacious End/Corner unit with Lanai” and “There is a large lanai with storage closet.” These repeated references across different units and agents strongly indicate the building offers lanai/patio-style outdoor spaces.

Although the building is near Waikiki beach and attractions, there is no indication of a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. MLS data also does not list such a feature.

There are no references to a children's playground or tot lot in any listing. MLS data also omits this amenity, indicating the building does not provide a playground.

Across all 5 listings, outdoor space is only described as a “lanai” or balcony, with no mention of yards, fenced areas, or private ground-level outdoor spaces. Given the high-rise Waikiki condo context and lack of yard-related language, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas.

None of the listings mention a putting green or golf practice area. With all MLS records lacking this checkbox, it is almost certain the building does not have a putting green.

The only common-area amenity explicitly mentioned is a pool. With no references to a recreation deck or amenity area and no MLS checkboxes for this feature, a dedicated recreation area is unlikely.

Remarks describe a pool but do not mention any rec room, game room, or multi-purpose room. MLS amenities also never list a recreation room, so it is very likely absent.

Remarks describe proximity to Waikiki shops and restaurants, not an on-site dining facility. The restaurant amenity is never checked in MLS, so the building likely has no internal restaurant.

Remarks focus on unit lanais and city/mountain views but do not mention a rooftop deck or rooftop amenities. The MLS consistently leaves rooftop features unchecked, so shared rooftop access is unlikely.

All remarks are silent on any sauna or steam facilities. Combined with the lack of a sauna checkbox in MLS, this strongly suggests the building does not include a sauna.

In 5 listings, there are no remarks about building-provided storage lockers or extra storage areas; storage is only mentioned as a lanai storage closet and in-unit storage. With just 2 of 5 MLS records loosely tagging storage and no descriptive support, it appears the building does not have dedicated storage units for residents.

The remarks were searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and none were found. Only general or in-unit storage is mentioned, with no indication of a dedicated building facility for surfboards. Based on this absence, it is moderately likely the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.

There are no references to tennis courts in any of the remarks. MLS data for all listings also omits tennis courts, so the building almost certainly does not have them.

Across all available data, every listing (7/7 current and prior) consistently selects the trash chute amenity in MLS. Although the public remarks do not mention a trash chute explicitly, the uniform checkbox data over time from multiple agents strongly indicates that the building has a shared trash chute system.

Listings describe “1 assigned parking stall downstairs near the elevator” and “one covered parking stall,” indicating standard self-parking. No remarks among the 5 listings use terms like “valet” or “valet parking,” making it very unlikely that valet service is offered.

Remarks emphasize walkability to Waikiki attractions and do not reference any gated or enclosed community access. Combined with the lack of any gated/wall/fence amenity in the MLS data, this strongly suggests the building is not surrounded by a security wall or fence.

One listing notes a "nice swimming pool" and another says "Building has Pool for residence" without any reference to a hot tub, jacuzzi, or spa. MLS data also omits whirlpool amenities, so the building likely has only a standard pool.

Multiple recent listings for Governor Cleghorn confirm a shared pool: 4 of 7 current remarks explicitly reference a building pool with phrases like 'building's refreshing swimming pool' and 'Building has Pool for residence.' Combined with 6/7 MLS records checking pool-related amenities and prior high-confidence data, there is strong evidence that the building offers a common swimming pool to residents.

Across all provided listings, the pool is mentioned but never described as heated, and 0/5 MLS entries mark any heated-pool options. Given that agents highlight the pool itself yet omit any 'heated' language or checkbox, it is highly likely the building does not have a heated pool.

The public remarks reference a swimming pool but do not specify that it is salt water. Searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found none. Based on the absence of any such mentions, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.

All 7 recent listings for this building explicitly mention an in‑unit washer/dryer with clear phrases like “In-unit washer/dryer,” “washer and dryer with 1 assigned parking stall,” and “The Botch washer and dryer are located in the bathroom.” Multiple different units and remarks confirm that at least some (and likely most) units have their own washer/dryer, so buyers searching for in‑unit laundry should consider this building.

None of the 5 listings reference shared or community laundry, and the community-laundry amenity is unchecked in all current MLS entries. Given the consistent emphasis on in-unit washers/dryers and lack of any mention of a laundry room, it is very likely this building does not offer separate community laundry facilities.

Searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'card-operated', or 'laundry fee' and found none. Given the consistent emphasis on in-unit laundry and no reference to paid common machines, it is moderately likely that there is no paid community laundry setup.

Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'community laundry'. All listings instead highlight in-unit laundry, with no indication of floor-by-floor shared facilities. Based on this absence, it is moderately likely that there is no community laundry on every floor.

All 5 current MLS listings indicate some type of parking, and remarks reference parking directly (e.g., 'that coveted parking stall'). This is consistent across multiple units and agents, so the building clearly offers parking for residents.

Multiple listings describe a dedicated stall, including one that clearly says '1 assigned parking stall downstairs near the elevator.' With 6 of 7 current MLS records checking ASSIGN, assigned/reserved parking is a well-established building feature rather than an agent error.

At least two different listings from different agents advertise a 'secure covered parking stall' and 'one covered parking stall.' Combined with 5 of 7 MLS records marking covered/garage parking, the evidence strongly supports covered parking as a standard building feature.

All listings clearly state that units include assigned or covered parking stalls, but none state that the parking is deeded or owned as part of the unit’s title. Searched specifically for phrases like 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed' and found none. In the absence of explicit language, deeded parking is treated as not confirmed/likely not applicable.

Across all reviewed listings, there is no MLS checkbox for EV charging and no textual reference to EV or Tesla charging. Given that such a feature is typically highlighted when present, the evidence strongly suggests the building does not offer EV charging stations.

Reviewed all remarks for terms such as 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or a dollar amount tied specifically to parking and found no references. Parking is mentioned as a stall that comes with the unit, without any extra monthly cost indicated. With no explicit information, a separate parking fee cannot be determined.

Agents emphasize other parking advantages (assigned, covered, good stall location) but never mention guest or visitor parking. The consistent absence of any MLS or remark reference makes it unlikely that the building has dedicated guest parking.

Parking is marketed as a 'secure covered parking stall' in at least one unit, indicating controlled-access parking rather than open, unsecured stalls. With 3 of 7 current MLS entries checking SECENT and consistent historical data, secured-entry parking is very likely present in the building.

Tandem parking is usually called out specifically because it affects usability, yet neither the MLS fields nor remarks mention it across any listings. This strongly suggests there are no tandem parking stalls in the building.

None of the listings reference valet or attended parking in either checkboxes or public remarks. Given that valet service is a premium amenity that agents nearly always advertise, the evidence strongly indicates the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched for phrases like 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or instructions to apply or wait for a parking stall and found none. Listings instead describe specific assigned/covered stalls that come with the unit. This absence suggests the building does not operate a formal parking waitlist system.

Elevator access is discussed only in terms of convenience to parking, with no language about secured or restricted access. With 0/5 listings indicating any elevator security feature, it is very likely the elevators are standard, non-keyed access.

Public remarks describe location, interior upgrades, amenities like pool and parking, but do not reference any card or fob-based access system. Searched for terms such as key card, keycard, fob, electronic access, and card reader and found no evidence that such a system exists.

Across 5 listings, there are zero mentions of a security guard or staffed security and the SECGUA amenity is never selected. In a Waikiki condo this would be a notable selling point and is likely to appear in remarks if available. Evidence strongly suggests the building does not offer security guard service.

Remarks focus on unit features, building amenities, and proximity to Waikiki, without indicating any security patrol or roving security service. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, patrol service, and patrolled and found no evidence of patrol services.

None of the 5 listings mention security cameras or video surveillance, and the MLS security-system checkbox is never used. Given that agents highlight safety features when present, the absence of any such references indicates the building likely does not have a notable video security system.

Across 5 listings, zero indicate central air in the MLS data and no remarks reference central AC, HVAC, or a building-wide cooling system. The consistent absence of any central AC mentions, combined with multiple listings showing window units instead, strongly suggests the building does not have central air.

The MLS data for all 5 listings shows no split AC inclusions and no remarks reference mini-split, ductless, or individual split systems. Given the repeated indication of window AC instead, it is very likely the building does not offer split AC systems in its units.

MLS inclusions for this building consistently list ACWIUN (window air conditioning) on 6 of 7 current listings, reinforcing prior data that also showed frequent window A/C indications. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention air conditioning, the repeated checkbox usage across multiple listings strongly suggests that at least some units have window A/C. This pattern across different units and agents indicates the building offers/permits window air conditioning rather than this being an isolated or erroneous entry.

All recent MLS listings for this building (7/7 currently, plus 5/5 in prior data) flag concrete in the construction_materials field, indicating a concrete-constructed building. None of the public remarks contradict this or describe a different primary building material. Given consistent MLS data across multiple listings and time, the building is treated as concrete construction with very high confidence.

Double-wall is not consistently reported; just one listing checks it and offers no narrative support in the remarks. For a concrete Waikiki condo building, MLS usually would not emphasize double-wall as a primary construction type. The inconsistent, unsupported MLS use makes double-wall construction unlikely as a defining feature.

None of the public remarks or MLS checkboxes point to hollow tile construction. Agents consistently label the building as concrete only, which is typical for this area and era. The lack of any hollow-tile indicators across multiple listings suggests hollow-tile construction is not a defining feature here.

Across five listings, there are no mentions of stucco or masonry construction, and agents do not check the masonry/stucco option in MLS. The building is consistently characterized simply as concrete. This pattern indicates masonry-stucco is not a primary construction descriptor for this property.

One listing shows steel frame checked, but all five show concrete construction and none describe a steel structural system in the remarks. Given Waikiki’s typical reinforced-concrete condo towers and the lack of corroborating text, this isolated MLS entry is likely incorrect. The building is best characterized as concrete, not steel frame.

There are no references in remarks to a slab foundation (e.g., “concrete slab,” “slab-on-grade”), and agents do not mark the SLAB construction option in any of the five listings. Given how MLS is usually used in Honolulu, this suggests slab construction is not a defining or reported characteristic for this building. The building is instead consistently characterized simply as concrete construction.

No analysis available

Zero listings (0/5) mark wood frame construction, while all consistently mark concrete, which is standard for this type of Waikiki condo building. The remarks focus on interior upgrades and never mention wood-frame structure. This combination makes wood-frame construction highly unlikely here.

Most listings (4/5) do not mark above-ground construction, and none of the remarks describe an above-ground or post-and-pier structure. Instead, the building is presented as a standard concrete condominium with a parking structure and pool. The lone ABOGRO checkbox appears inconsistent with the building type and is likely erroneous.

There are no mentions of brick in any of the five listing remarks, and the MLS data never flags brick construction. In Honolulu, brick high-rise condo buildings are rare compared to reinforced concrete. This consistent absence across agents makes brick construction very unlikely for this building.

No listing flags single-wall construction or uses phrases like “single wall” or “old Hawaiian style,” which are normally called out when present. Instead, every listing identifies the building as concrete construction. Given the building type and location, single-wall construction can be confidently ruled out.

Remarks reference investment potential and rentals but do not indicate that short-term or vacation rentals are legally permitted. Looked for terms like 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', or 'legal daily rentals' and found none. Given the marketing style and absence of STR-specific language, short-term rentals are assumed not to be an allowed feature of the building.

Searched for references to a hotel rental pool or program, such as 'hotel rental pool', 'condotel', or management by a hotel brand, and found none. Listings describe a residential-style condo building rather than a hotel-condo operation. Since short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed, participation in a hotel rental pool is effectively ruled out.

Mandatory rental pool requirements are typically stated explicitly but are absent here, and the building is not described as operating under a hotel pool. Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar phrases with no results.

Across all reviewed listings, the tenure field is never coded as Fee Simple and no remarks use fee-simple terminology. Given the complete absence of FS indicators, we treat Fee Simple availability as not evidenced for this building based on current data.

None of the listings identify the units as leasehold or mention any land lease details. With no LH codes or lease-related remarks, Leasehold availability is not supported by the present data.

Searched for terms like 'leasehold', 'land lease', 'lease expires', or specific expiration years and found no references. Without any explicit leasehold or expiration information, the lease expiry year cannot be determined. The field is left unknown (null).

Reviewed all public remarks for references to VA approval or VA financing and found none. Buildings that support VA loans are often explicitly advertised as such. In the absence of any mention across several listings, VA approval is presumed not to be a feature of this building.

The text was checked for explicit statements that the HOA provides full or walls-in building insurance and none were present. Because this information is only determined from remarks, the field is set to false by default due to lack of evidence.

No listing remarks reference fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and the corresponding MLS amenity checkbox is unchecked in every case. This consistent absence across multiple listings indicates the building is unlikely to have a noted fire sprinkler system.

The remarks were reviewed for terms like "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or similar phrases and none appeared. In the absence of any reference, this is treated as not documented/passed in remarks and set to false by default.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least one unit description mentions 'a crack at the ocean,' confirming partial ocean views from the building. MLS data (1/5 listings with OCEAN checked) is consistent with this, suggesting some units enjoy ocean exposure even if limited.

At least one listing’s remarks explicitly advertise 'Skyline and Mountain Views' for a corner unit, and 2/7 current MLS records include MOUNTA in the view field. This aligns with prior high-confidence data, indicating some units in the building offer mountain views. Evidence appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a single copy-paste error.

Across five listings, views are described as city, ocean, and mountain, but Diamond Head is never mentioned. MLS view data also shows no Diamond Head checkbox usage, making it unlikely that any units feature this view.

Multiple listings confirm city views, including phrases like 'Skyline and Mountain Views' and 'a nice view of the city and a crack at the ocean.' Current MLS view data shows CITY checked on 4 of 7 listings and none marked as having no view. Evidence is consistent across time and different units, indicating that at least some units in the building offer city views.

The only water-related description is a 'crack at the ocean,' not an expansive coastline or shoreline vista. Given the lack of coastline-specific language in remarks and MLS data, coastline views are unlikely for this building.

Even when detailing views, agents mention skyline, mountain, and ocean but not gardens or courtyards. The lack of any garden-view references in remarks or MLS strongly indicates the building does not offer garden views.

View descriptions focus on skyline, mountain, city, and some ocean, with no hint of golf course vistas. MLS data similarly has no golf-course view checkboxes, so golf course views are very unlikely for this building.

Listings near Waikiki often highlight marina or harbor views if present, but these five only mention city, mountain, and partial ocean views. The absence of any marina/harbor terms in remarks and MLS fields suggests the building lacks marina views.

Agents do not call out sunrise or morning/east exposure in any of the five listings. Since other view types are described in detail, this absence suggests sunrise views are not a notable selling point here.

While the neighborhood is associated with beach sunsets, the unit remarks do not state that sunsets are visible from the building itself. With no MLS or remark evidence of sunset views, this appears not to be a defined view feature of the property.

Across all available listings, there is no reference—positive or negative—to a cemetery view. Combined with zero cemetery view checkboxes in MLS, this strongly indicates the building does not overlook a cemetery.

View descriptions are limited to skyline, mountain, city, and a 'crack at the ocean'. I searched for any mention of watching or seeing Friday night fireworks from the unit or lanai and found none, so a fireworks view is unlikely based on current remarks.

No analysis available

There are no explicit references to pets, dogs, or cats in the public remarks, but also no statements like “no pets allowed.” MLS data shows 0/5 listings with a NOPET restriction, which, combined with the absence of prohibitive language, suggests the building permits pets with some confidence.

All 7 current MLS listings for this building have the RESMAN amenity flag, indicating a resident/on-site manager, and this pattern is consistent across multiple agents. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, but there is also no indication that the feature has been removed. Given the uniform MLS data and prior high confidence, the building is still treated as having a resident manager on-site.

One listing notes “over half of the building is owner occupied” and calls it perfect for a buyer seeking a mortgage, which is atypical for condotels. No remarks mention hotel programs, front desk, nightly rentals, or the term “condotel,” and 0/5 MLS entries use a CONDOT architectural style code, strongly indicating it is not a condotel.

Across all 5 listings the property is described as a “condo” with conventional association fees, and there is no mention of shares, proprietary leases, or cooperative ownership. MLS data shows 0/5 listings with COOTAX in association_fee_includes, so it is very likely not a co-op building.