Gateway Peninsula
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Gateway Peninsula
Building Overview
Gateway Peninsula in Hawaii Kai, built 1972; pets allowed and short‑term rentals are not permitted.
About Gateway Peninsula
Gateway Peninsula is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, originally built in 1972. According to available records, specific details on building size (number of units/floors) and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
No amenity list or common-area features are specified in the MLS information supplied. Buyers should be aware that the MLS-derived data for this property does not include descriptions of on-site facilities, interior features, or recent renovations.
Based on MLS data, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Information about parking, maintenance fees, and other association policies is not provided here; prospective buyers should verify those details with the listing agent or association and confirm all facts independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in the maintenance fees for at least some units, based on CABTV being checked in 6 of 10 current listings. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'cable included,' so this is driven mostly by MLS data rather than marketing copy.
Common area electricity is supported by MLS inclusions in 8 of 10 current listings, which is fairly consistent across the building. Public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the repeated MLS checkbox usage suggests this is a real building expense covered by fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water appears not to be included in the maintenance fee. The strongest signal is that 8 of 10 listings include WTRHTR, which عادة indicates the units heat their own water, while only 2 of 10 list HOTWAT and no remarks mention building-supplied hot water.
Internet inclusion shows up in a minority of current MLS entries, with INTSER checked in 4 of 10 listings. No public remarks explicitly confirm it, so this looks like MLS-entered building data rather than agent-described amenity text.
Marina access is very strongly supported across many listings and remarks. Multiple agents describe 'direct marina access,' 'assigned boat slip,' 'OWN PRIVATE BOAT DOCK,' and 'deeded private dock,' making this one of the most reliable features for the building.
Sewer inclusion appears in a minority of current MLS listings, with SEWER checked in 4 of 10. Public remarks do not mention sewer directly, so this remains a moderate-confidence MLS-based feature.
Water is shown as included in most current MLS listings, with WATER checked in 7 of 10. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'water included,' but the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is likely part of the association fees.
No listings (0/6) mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or a grilling area and current MLS amenities show BBQ unchecked across all listings. Public remarks repeatedly describe marina, lanais, pool, clubhouse, dock and outdoor shower but contain no reference to BBQ facilities. Given both the historical assessment (high confidence) and the current absence of any mention across multiple agent remarks, there is no evidence the building offers BBQ amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is good evidence the building includes car wash facilities. One listing directly mentions a "car wash area," and the MLS data is also strongly supportive with 8/10 amenity checkboxes indicating CRWSH, so this appears to be a genuine shared feature.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a clubhouse/community center. Multiple listings explicitly say "clubhouse," "community clubhouse," and "clubhouse area," and the historical MLS data is already highly consistent (9/10 checked).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence: 4 of 7 current MLS listings include the meeting room amenity (MEEROO) and at least one listing remark explicitly states 'meeting room' ('Community amenities include... a meeting room'). While historical data was absent, the direct mention in remarks plus multiple MLS checkboxes supports including meeting_room (confidence set to 0.85).
This feature is strongly supported across many listings: roughly 8+ remarks explicitly describe lanais, decks, or outdoor living areas. The language is consistent across multiple agents and reads like genuine feature description rather than checkbox-only copy-paste. The building clearly offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces for buyers searching for them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks from multiple listings repeatedly describe community amenities such as a pool, clubhouse, boat docks and meeting room, but do not use terms like 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation deck' or 'amenity deck'. Only 2 of 9 MLS amenity checkboxes show RECARE, which conflicts with the absence in agent remarks and suggests checkbox inconsistencies rather than a true building-wide recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Consistent evidence that the building offers storage: historical data noted storage in multiple listings (high confidence), and current public remarks across several listings explicitly mention ‘built-in cabinetry,’ ‘exterior storage,’ ‘outdoor storage sheds,’ and ‘gigantic attic storage area.’ At least 5–6 of the listings’ remarks reference storage features, indicating the building provides storage/lockers or equivalent unit-level and exterior storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A whirlpool-type amenity is supported by explicit remark language: one listing describes an outdoor "jacuzzi". While current MLS checkbox support is limited (1/10), the direct mention is specific enough to treat this as a real building/unit amenity available to buyers.
Pool is strongly supported for this building. The current MLS shows 10/10 listings with pool-related amenities, and several remarks explicitly say "community pool," "pool and clubhouse," or "community amenities include a pool." The repeated mentions across multiple listings suggest this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the current listings: MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER in 10/10 records, and remarks in multiple listings explicitly describe a laundry area/center inside the home. This looks consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, so in-unit laundry should be treated as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention dedicated parking, including 'two covered side-by-side parking stalls' and 'two parking stalls.' While some remarks are copy-paste style, the consistency across several listings strongly supports assigned/reserved parking being available for this building.
Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least two listings explicitly say 'two covered parking stalls' / 'two covered side-by-side parking stalls,' matching the previously high-confidence pattern across the building.
I searched for wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only describe the number and type of stalls, so deeded parking is not established from the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a monthly parking fee or parking rental cost. The remarks mention parking stalls and guest parking, but give no indication of any separate parking charge.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in several remarks, often in the amenities section: 'Community amenities include a pool, clubhouse, guest parking, and resident manager.' With prior high-confidence MLS support, this is a well-established building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language like "parking waitlist" or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. The public remarks describe available parking without any indication that a waitlist system exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 listings and MLS checkbox data indicate central A/C is present in some units (CURRENT MLS: 2/7 with ACCEN/CENAC). Public remarks explicitly state "central A/C" (e.g., "offers approximately 1,850 sq ft with central A/C"), suggesting some units in the building have central air; evidence is moderate but consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS fields.
At least 1 current listing explicitly mentions "energy-efficient split A/C throughout," which is strong direct evidence. The rest of the remarks mostly focus on waterfront features and do not contradict this, so split AC should remain included with very high confidence.
No current remark references "window AC," "window units," or similar language; the only HVAC mentions are split A/C and central A/C. With 0 listings explicitly supporting window AC and the prior confidence low, the checkbox looks likely to be copy-paste noise rather than a verified feature of the building.
No analysis available
Double wall construction appears in 7 of 10 current MLS records, indicating it is commonly associated with this building. The public remarks are silent on construction, so this is supported primarily by the MLS pattern rather than direct descriptive text.
No analysis available
Construction is listed as masonry and stucco in 9 of 10 current MLS records, which is a strong building-level pattern. None of the public remarks explicitly contradict this, and there is no sign of a manual correction, so this feature should be retained with high confidence.
No analysis available
Four of six listings (4/6) indicate SLAB in construction materials. Public remarks do not reference a concrete slab or "solid concrete foundation," so the feature is included based on MLS entries but lacks explicit confirmation in the listings' narrative text.
No analysis available
3 of 9 current MLS listings include WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks mention construction type. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across a minority of listings and could reflect unit-level variation or agent checkbox use; confidence is moderate (implied from MLS entries, not from agent remarks).
Three of eight current MLS listings (3/8) mark 'ABOGRO' in construction materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'above ground' construction or above-ground materials. The evidence is weak and inconsistent across multiple agent entries, suggesting possible checkbox variability rather than a clearly stated building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," "TVU," or minimum-stay rules. None are mentioned, so STR permission is not supported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel pool terminology such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand pool references. There is no such language in the listings, so a hotel rental pool is not evidenced.
I searched for phrases like "mandatory hotel pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out." The remarks do not mention any rental program, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to leasehold status, ground lease, lease expiry, or renewal years such as "expires 2050" or "renewed through 2075." Nothing in the remarks provides a lease expiration date, so the year remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted" and found none. With no evidence in the listings, this is best treated as not indicated from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings, with multiple agents describing the unit or building as having ocean, Pacific Ocean, or Maunalua Bay views. The evidence appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise, and several remarks pair ocean views with marina/front waterfront living.
Mountain views are well supported, mainly through repeated references to Koko Head, which is the clearest mountain-view cue in the remarks. Multiple listings mention Koko Head from the primary suite, back lanai, or as part of the overall view set.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are not clearly supported by the public remarks. While the building is repeatedly described as waterfront with ocean and marina views, none of the listings explicitly mention coastline, shoreline, or coastal views, so this appears to be an MLS data artifact rather than a verified feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are the most consistently documented feature in the remarks, with nearly every listing framed as marina-front or direct waterfront. The language is highly repetitive across agents, but it aligns with the building's core identity and is clearly not just a copied checkbox.
Sunrise views are explicitly confirmed in at least two remarks, including one that says residents can "enjoy beautiful sunrises" and another that highlights "stunning sunrises over Koko Head." This is moderate-to-strong support for sunrise exposure/viewing in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listing remarks supports this feature. At least 4 separate remarks explicitly mention a "resident manager" or "on-site resident manager," alongside other shared amenities like pool and clubhouse. This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.