Gardenia Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Gardenia Manor
Building Overview
Gardenia Manor in Kailua — concrete/wood-frame building with pool and resident manager.
About Gardenia Manor
Gardenia Manor is located in the Kailua neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and wood frame. MLS data does not provide unit count or floor information, so buyers should verify building size and layout with the listing agent or management.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted per the available records. No further amenity details (such as clubhouse hours or pool rules) are listed in the MLS information provided.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned, with guest parking available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; prospective buyers should confirm fees, rules, and current management details with the seller or condominium association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptions such as "mostly owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but none appeared in the remarks. Since this is not stated anywhere in the listing remarks, the share of owner-occupied units remains unknown. There is no basis to infer a number.
The public remarks repeatedly reference elevator access, including being near "the elevators" and having "an elevator." No listing states an exact elevator count beyond that, so the current value of 1 is supported but not precisely contradicted. This is consistent with the building context and the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is highly consistent, with 18 of 20 recent listings checking OTCOEX, which is strong building-level evidence rather than a one-off agent entry. The remarks describe a well-maintained, amenity-rich building, but do not specifically mention this item.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee. Only 1 of 20 recent listings includes HOTWAT, and many explicitly note a water heater (WTRHTR/new water heater), which is a strong indicator that hot water is unit-level rather than building-provided. The remarks repeatedly mention new or replaced water heaters, reinforcing that interpretation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is nearly unanimous, with 19 of 20 recent listings checking SEWER, which is very strong and consistent across multiple agents. The remarks do not suggest any change or exception.
Water is very likely included in the maintenance fee. MLS data shows 19 of 20 recent listings include WATER, making this a strong building-level feature. The public remarks are consistent with a shared-maintenance condo and do not provide contrary evidence.
BBQ is very strongly supported across the building. It appears in 20 of 20 current MLS listings, and several remarks explicitly mention 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grill,' or even '2 BBQ areas,' which looks consistent rather than agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are strongly supported. With 18 of 20 MLS listings checking the box and several remarks explicitly saying 'car wash area,' this appears to be a real shared building amenity rather than a mistaken checkbox.
Evidence for a clubhouse/community center is moderate rather than strong. The remarks include at least one explicit reference to a "community center" and one to a "party area," which are consistent with a shared clubhouse-style amenity, but most listings do not mention it directly. The MLS history also shows only 11/20 listings checked, so this appears plausible but not universally confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Gardenia Manor offers patio/deck-style amenities. Roughly 13+ listings mention features like “private lanai,” “large lanai,” “covered patio,” “wrap-around lanai,” and “outdoor living space,” with several remarks describing multiple lanais or expansive outdoor areas. This is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the MLS amenities data, so patio/deck should remain included.
There is no direct building-level support for a jogging or walking path. The few MLS checkboxes are sparse at 3 of 20, and the remarks only reference nearby bike paths or outdoor recreation, which reads as location marketing rather than an on-site amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area has moderate-to-strong support. About 11 of 20 MLS listings currently check it, and multiple remarks refer to 'recreation space' or 'recreation areas,' suggesting this is a shared amenity even if phrasing varies by agent.
Multiple public remarks explicitly mention "recreation space", "recreation areas", or "party area" as part of the complex amenities (several agent descriptions across the provided listings), which constitutes direct confirmation that the building offers a shared recreation room/space. Given the explicit mentions across listings, the feature is included despite low prior MLS checkbox prevalence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for Gardenia Manor across many listings and agents. Remarks mention it in multiple forms—"dedicated storage unit," "storage locker," "private storage locker," "additional storage," and "extra storage space"—showing this is not a one-off copy-paste artifact. The feature appears both at the building level and in specific unit descriptions, so buyers can confidently expect storage availability in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported as a shared building amenity. Roughly 15+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'community pool,' 'sparkling pool,' 'swimming pool,' and 'take a refreshing dip in the pool.' The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and appears consistent rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports laundry_in_unit. At least 8 separate remarks explicitly reference washer/dryer in the unit or stacked/full-size in-unit laundry, and the MLS inclusions are already showing this in 18/20 listings. The repeated mentions across different listings and agents suggest this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that parking is assigned/reserved. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention "assigned side by side parking stalls," "assigned 2-parking stalls," or similar wording, and the MLS data is still largely consistent (17/20).
Very strong evidence that the building offers covered parking. Numerous remarks explicitly mention "covered parking stalls," "2 covered parking stalls," and "side-by-side covered parking," with the MLS parking features checked on all 20/20 listings. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a stable building feature rather than copy-paste error.
I looked for deeded-parking language such as deeded, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking stall included with the unit and found no explicit match. The listings consistently describe assigned or covered stalls, which does not prove deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, additional cost, rental parking, or stall fee and found nothing. The listings describe parking as included/assigned, but do not state any separate monthly parking expense.
Strong evidence that guest parking is available at the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'ample guest parking,' 'guest parking for visitors,' and 'guest parking area,' supporting the MLS guest-parking flag. The references appear across several listings and are not isolated to one agent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or joining a parking queue and found none. The remarks instead emphasize assigned stalls and guest parking, but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 20 current MLS listings list CONCRE (concrete) as a construction material, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or related terms. The repeated MLS checkbox suggests the building may be concrete, but absence of any explicit remark across listings implies the evidence is implied and may reflect agent copy/paste.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with 17 of 20 listings showing DOUWAL. The public remarks do not explicitly say "double wall" or "two walls," but the MLS pattern is consistent across many listings, suggesting this is a true building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco construction appears to be a common building-level material in this complex, with 16 of 20 current MLS listings marked MASSTU. None of the public remarks explicitly say "masonry," "stucco," or "masonry and stucco," so this is supported mainly by repeated MLS data rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data indicates wood frame construction in 11 of 20 current listings; public remarks contain 0 mentions of 'wood frame' or related phrases. Evidence comes solely from MLS checkboxes and appears to be agent-entered data (possible copy/paste); confidence is moderate (0.75) because remarks do not confirm.
Above-ground construction appears only in 5 of 20 MLS listings and is not mentioned in the public remarks. The evidence is weak and may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than a clearly documented building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC/TVU, legal short-term rental, or minimum-stay rules and found no evidence. Because there is no public remark supporting STR use, this is treated as not allowed from the available data.
I looked for hotel pool language such as managed by hotel, rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar references and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature must also be false.
I searched for mandatory hotel-pool language such as required participation, must-rent rules, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel rental program or STR allowance, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, or expiry dates and found none. One remark says "FS unit" (fee simple), which points away from a leasehold, but there is still no explicit lease-expiry year to extract.
The public remarks directly support VA loan availability for this building. Several listings reference assumable VA loans, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted here.
I looked for HOA insurance language indicating full or walls-in coverage, but the public remarks do not mention insurance status at all. With no explicit support, this cannot be verified from the listings. The value is therefore left false with low confidence based on absence of evidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE, life safety compliance, fire safety certified, or passed inspection, and found nothing. Because there is no affirmative evidence in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false with low confidence. The absence of mention is not strong proof either way.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are strongly supported across the building, with 15 of 20 current MLS listings showing GARDEN in the view field and only 1 listing showing NONE. Multiple remarks from different listings describe a "lush courtyard," "lush landscaping," and "beautiful grounds," indicating this is not just copy-paste data. The evidence is consistent across agents and listings, so view_garden should be treated as a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported across the building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention an on-site resident manager or resident manager living on property, and the MLS amenities data shows 19/20 listings with RESMAN checked. This appears to be a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.