Fairway House
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Fairway House
Building Overview
Fairway House in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building (1981); pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Fairway House
Based on MLS data, Fairway House is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1981 and is of concrete construction. Building size and unit counts are not specified in the available MLS records.
Key features noted in the MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No specific onsite amenities (such as a pool, gym, or recreational areas) are listed in the provided records.
Additional details from the MLS indicate the management company is unknown in available listings. Information on parking, maintenance fees, assessments, or other building policies is not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or building management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks mention tenant occupancy in one listing and a resident manager on site, but they do not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or similar language. The only reference was singular and incidental, which is not enough to determine the number of elevators with confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included based on current MLS data in 13 of 20 listings. There are no public remarks explicitly confirming or denying it, so the evidence is moderate and may reflect repeated MLS entry rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by MLS data: 16 of 20 listings include HOTWAT and none show WTRHTR. Public remarks do not mention fee inclusions, but there is no contrary evidence, so this is a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fees according to 18 of 20 current listings. This is very strong MLS-based evidence, and the remarks contain no contradiction.
Water is included in the maintenance fees in 17 of 20 listings. The evidence is strong across the current MLS dataset, and nothing in the public remarks suggests a correction is needed.
BBQ/grilling amenities are mentioned across many listings, including phrases like "BBQ area," "BBQ with picnic area," and "newly added community grill." The current MLS signal is strong and consistent, and the remarks appear to be repeated by multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings call out a 'car wash area' or 'car washing station' and MLS data shows 11/19. The consistent explicit mentions across remarks support including a building-level car wash facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog-park features are consistently referenced across listings, including "dog park," "private dog park," "designated dog park," and "new Dog Park." The repetition across multiple agents and the strong MLS match make this a high-confidence building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid evidence of a shared recreation/amenity space, with remarks citing "recreation area," "rooftop lounge/viewing area," "rooftop entertainment area," and picnic/common gathering areas. The feature appears in multiple listings, suggesting a genuine building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the remarks, there are no clear references to building storage units or lockers. One listing mentions 'additional storage cabinets' in the lanai, but that is unit-level storage, not a shared building amenity. With only 1/20 MLS amenity checks and no corroborating remarks, this looks like agent copy/paste noise rather than a verified building feature.
I searched for surfboard storage-related wording in the remarks and found nothing. The listings mention amenities like parking, car wash, and rooftop deck, but no surfboard storage facility.
Tennis court access is referenced in several listings with phrases like "tennis court," "pickleball/tennis court," and "tennis and pickleball courts." The repeated mentions across different remarks support this as a real building amenity, not just MLS checkbox noise.
MLS checkbox data strongly indicates a trash chute (14/19 listings), however none of the public remarks mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. With no owner/site-visit verification and absence from remarks, the feature is provisionally included based on MLS data but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a pool. At least 15+ of the current listings mention it directly, with remarks such as 'swimming pool,' 'pool/Jacuzzi,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'take a dip in the shimmering pool.' The consistency across multiple listings and agents makes this a high-confidence shared amenity.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a saltwater or saline pool and found none. The amenities only mention a pool, jacuzzi, whirlpool, spa, and similar features, without indicating the pool type.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the listings: well over a dozen remarks explicitly mention an in-unit washer/dryer, and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 19 of 20 listings. The wording is consistent across multiple agents, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that community laundry is paid or coin-operated, but the remarks do not mention shared laundry at all. The only laundry references are to in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for references to laundry rooms on each floor or floor-by-floor laundry access, but found none. The listings only mention in-unit washer and dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
All 19 listings show parking features in MLS checkboxes and public remarks frequently mention parking (e.g., '1 parking stall', '2 dedicated parking stalls', 'assigned parking', 'guest parking'). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and the MLS data, indicating the building provides parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the current listings. At least 10+ remarks explicitly mention it with phrases like 'assigned parking stall,' 'reserved, covered parking space,' 'designated parking stall,' and 'two dedicated parking stalls,' while MLS data shows ASSIGN in 16/20 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
18 of 19 MLS listings include covered/garage parking features and many remarks explicitly state covered parking (quotes: '1 Covered Pkg', '2-covered parking stalls', 'assigned, covered parking space', 'partially covered'). The consistency between MLS data and multiple agent remarks supports high confidence that the building offers covered parking.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, parking included in deed, owned stall, or parking included with title. The remarks only mention assigned, reserved, covered, secure, and dedicated parking stalls, which does not prove deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for any monthly parking charge, parking fee, rental, or additional cost and found none. The listings describe parking stalls and guest parking, but do not state a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found nothing. The remarks instead describe assigned, reserved, covered, and guest parking, but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks describe the building as secure and mention secured entry, but they do not specify a card or fob access system. I found no public remark evidence of card-based security.
Security-related language appears in multiple current listings, but only 5 of 20 MLS records are checked for SECGUA and most remarks describe the building as 'secure' rather than explicitly naming a guard. One listing specifically mentions 'nightly security patrol' and another says the building has 'security in a secured building,' which suggests on-site security service, but the evidence is not strong enough for high confidence.
The public remarks directly state that the building has nightly security patrol service. This is strong evidence and overrides any lower-confidence prior assumption.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 19 of 20 current listings showing CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention the construction material, but the listing pattern is consistent across many agents rather than a one-off entry.
Limited MLS indication: 5 of 19 listings mark double-wall construction (DOUWAL). No public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar, and the low number of checklist hits suggests the feature may apply only to some units or be a data-entry inconsistency. Included because some listings indicate it, but confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in only 3 of 20 current listings, with no supporting language in the public remarks. Because the remarks are silent and the MLS signal is sparse, this looks like low-confidence, possibly inconsistent agent-entered data rather than a clearly documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-night rule language and found no references. Since there is no public remark evidence that STR is allowed, I set this to false.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar program language and found none. Because the remarks do not indicate that short-term rentals are allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or similar wording and found nothing. There is also no evidence that STR is allowed, so mandatory pool participation cannot be true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly state the leasehold ends in 2054, so that is the lease expiry year. This is a clear, high-confidence extraction from the listing text.
I searched the public remarks for 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. With no explicit VA-language in any listing, I cannot confirm VA eligibility from the remarks.
I searched the remarks for indicators of full HOA insurance coverage, including 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' and 'walls-in coverage.' Nothing in the listings confirms comprehensive building insurance, so this cannot be verified from the remarks.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported for this building. Across many current listings, multiple agents explicitly mention them in different wording, including 'Sprinklers are in the unit,' 'fire sprinklers in every room,' and 'Property has fire sprinklers,' which confirms the MLS amenity data rather than suggesting a copy-paste error. The historical MLS record was already high confidence, and the new remarks reinforce that this is a real building feature.
I looked for phrases indicating the building passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection. The remarks reference fire sprinklers, security, and a secured building, but do not state that the building passed an FLSE or equivalent evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks confirm ocean views, including phrases like "some ocean," "ocean views," "Waikiki and ocean views," and "the Pacific Ocean." While only 3/20 current MLS listings flag ocean in the view field, the remarks consistently show this is a real building-level offering for some units rather than a copy-paste error.
Most evidence is MLS-backed, with 9/20 current listings including mountain and a remark describing "garden, golf course and mountain views." The frequency suggests some units in the building do offer mountain views, even though it is not as consistently mentioned as Diamond Head or golf course.
This is one of the strongest features in the dataset: 19/20 current MLS listings include DIAHEA, and many remarks explicitly say "Diamond Head view," "views of Diamond Head," or "Majestic Diamond Head." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a genuine building-wide selling point for many units.
City views are strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks, with 16/20 current listings marked CITY. Several descriptions specifically call out the "Waikiki Skyline," which is a clear city-view indicator, suggesting this is a common view type in the building.
No analysis available
Garden views appear on a smaller subset of units, but they are explicitly mentioned in the remarks and supported by the MLS data. One listing states "garden, golf course and mountain views," which is enough to confirm that some units in the building offer garden views.
Golf course views are extremely well supported, with 19/20 current listings showing GOLCOU and many remarks stating "Ala Wai Golf Course," "golf course view," or "overlooking the golf course." The consistency across multiple listings indicates this is a major and genuine building feature for many units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by both MLS and remarks, with 10/20 current listings marked SUNSET. One listing specifically says the roof deck is for "watching Sunsets and Fireworks," which strongly supports sunset-oriented views or common viewing areas in the building.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly confirm fireworks views from the building/unit, including a private Friday firework show over Waikiki. This is direct evidence of fireworks being visible from the property, not merely being nearby.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS checkbox for a resident/on-site manager is set on most listings (16/19), and several remarks explicitly state 'Resident manager is on site' or 'site manager.' While the evidence is positive, fewer listings include this language compared with sprinklers, so confidence is moderate that a resident manager is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.