Ewa Villa Ests
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ewa Villa Ests
Building Overview
Ewa Villa Ests in Ewa — concrete construction from 1972; assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ewa Villa Ests
Ewa Villa Ests is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, originally built in 1972. The building is constructed of concrete, and records identify it by its year of construction and location.
Key features and amenities listed include assigned parking and guest parking. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to available records. Management company information is not provided in the MLS data.
Additional details from MLS data: parking is assigned with guest parking available; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company is listed as unknown. This summary is based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with official sources and the managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The county assessor, state registration, and listings all support 2 floors. No contrary residential-floor evidence is present.
The Hawaii state registration lists 84 units for this single-building registration, supporting 84. The county reconciled count is 81, so it is treated as conflicting rather than controlling.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 376. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator information, including references to multiple elevators or a specific number such as four. No elevator details were found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of nine current listings indicate OTCOEX in the association fee inclusions, consistent with the prior high-confidence conclusion that common-area electricity is included. None of the nine public remarks explicitly quotes 'common area electricity' or 'building power included,' so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data rather than independent agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 5 current listings mark HOTWAT as an included association fee item, and two listings list WTRHTR (water heater) as an in-unit feature, which strongly suggests hot water is not centrally supplied by the building. Remarks mention that water and sewer are submetered, reinforcing that utilities are individually metered and paid. With no textual references to hot water being covered by HOA dues and consistent MLS data, building-provided hot water should be treated as not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer does not appear to be included in the maintenance fees. The strongest remark says 'Water and sewer are submetered,' which contradicts inclusion, and the sparse 1/7 MLS checkbox looks like likely copy-paste noise rather than building policy.
Water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fees. Multiple remarks point to submetered utilities, and the lone 1/7 checkbox appears inconsistent with the listing text, suggesting agent data entry error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Outdoor space is repeatedly confirmed across the listings: remarks describe a “280 square foot fenced outdoor lanai,” “spacious lanai,” “private lanai/courtyard,” “private outdoor space,” and a “private fenced in lanai area.” The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, and the strong MLS checkbox support confirms that patio/deck or lanai amenities are available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly mention on-site recreation: phrases include 'playground', 'small play area nearby for residents', 'basketball hoop', and 'basketball court' found in at least 4 of the provided listing remarks. MLS checkbox RECARE is present in 3 of 6 current listings, and the consistent, agent-written remarks across listings support that the building offers a common recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the combined public remarks (0/6) mention storage units or lockers. MLS checkbox data is sparse (1/6 listings include STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities; 2/6 include STORAG in unit_features) and there is no prior confidence; given the absence of any remarks across multiple listings, the checkbox entries appear to be copy-paste errors, so storage_unit is marked false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: 9 of 9 current listings identify washer/dryer in the inclusions, and one listing explicitly states, 'The brand new washer and dryer are conveniently located in the unit.' The consistent MLS data and direct remark confirmation indicate this feature is available in the building, rather than being an isolated or unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: 8 of 9 remarks mention it, with phrases such as "parking is conveniently located right outside your front door," "dedicated parking stall," and "assigned parking stall." This aligns with all 9 MLS records showing parking features and no NONE entries.
Assigned parking is consistently supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings state "one assigned parking stall," "two assigned parking stalls," "dedicated parking stall," or "assigned parking stall located right in front of the unit," confirming this is a building-level offering.
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention one or two assigned stalls, including stalls located in front of the units. Assigned or dedicated parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly identify a $75 monthly rental charge for a second parking stall. Other listings mention assigned and guest parking but do not provide a different parking fee.
Guest parking is well confirmed across multiple listings, with remarks citing "guest parking also available," "three nearby guest parking stalls," "guest parking," and "many guest stalls nearby." The strong MLS support and repeated descriptions across listings indicate the building offers guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned stalls, guest parking, and street parking. They do not indicate that residents must join or use a waitlist to obtain parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be present in some units based on MLS inclusions (5/7 listings checked ACWIUN). None of the public remarks explicitly say “window AC,” “window unit,” or similar, so the evidence is moderate and may reflect agent copy-paste rather than independently verified remarks. Still, because buyers searching for this feature would want to know it may be available in the building, it is reasonable to retain as a likely building-level option.
None of the 9 public remarks mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or concrete construction. Although 4 of 9 current MLS records include CONCRE, the feature lacks supporting remarks and has only Medium historical confidence, so it is omitted as an unreliable checkbox entry.
3 of 6 current MLS listings include DOUWAL (double wall) in construction_materials, yet none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' The evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across listings and may reflect agent copy/paste; included with low-moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 9 public remarks explicitly mention wood-frame construction or wood framing. However, 6 of 9 current MLS records include WOOFRA, which supports wood-frame construction at moderate confidence, though the checkbox data is not independently confirmed by multiple agent remarks.
There is limited evidence for above-ground construction: 1 of 7 current MLS records includes ABOGRO in construction_materials. None of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground or mention construction materials, so this looks more like sparse MLS checkbox data than confirmed narrative evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on residential ownership, community amenities, and proximity to the beach. They do not state that short-term rentals are permitted, so STR is not supported by the public remarks.
The listings contain no indication of a hotel-managed rental program or rental pool. Because STR permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is also false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks do not describe any required rental-pool arrangement or mandatory participation by owners. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fee-simple ownership indicates that the listings are not describing a leasehold interest. No lease expiration, ground lease end date, renewal date, or four-digit lease year was found.
The remarks mention lender approval for a buyer credit but do not state that the building is VA approved or accepts VA financing. No direct VA-related language was found.
The remarks were searched for full HOA insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No insurance details were mentioned, so full insurance is not established.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passage, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection. No such statements were found; there is no current verified value.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS checkboxes show 0/6 listings with GARDEN and 2/6 with NONE. Public remarks repeatedly mention 'private lanai/courtyard' and 'private fenced in lanai area' but do not explicitly say 'garden view', 'courtyard view' as a building view, or 'landscaped view.' Evidence is limited to unit-level outdoor spaces and appears more like unit descriptions than confirmation that the building offers garden views across units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 9 listings mention sunset views, and 8 explicitly state NONE in the view descriptions. Remarks focus on beach access, ocean proximity, tradewinds, and lanai enjoyment, with no sunset or western-exposure claims across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 9 listing remarks mention a resident or on-site manager. RESMAN appears in only 3 of 9 MLS records, with no corroborating descriptions across agents, so the feature is not supported by the available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.